Impact Factor 5.753 | CiteScore 8.2
More on impact ›

CORRECTION article

Front. Plant Sci., 11 June 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.699371

Corrigendum: Purification and Characterisation of Malate Dehydrogenase From Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: Biochemical Barrier of the Oxidative Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle

Masahiro Takeya, Shoki Ito, Haruna Sukigara and Takashi Osanai*
  • School of Agriculture, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan

In the original article, there were errors in Table 1 and Table S1 as published as a result of the incorrect calculation of kcat. We performed a re-calculation of and kcat values and corrected the kcat and kcat/Km values in Table 1 and Table S1; the corrected versions these tables and updated Table 1 footnote appear below.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Kinetic parameters of SyMDH.

TABLE S1
www.frontiersin.org

Table S1. Kinetic parameters of SyMDH calculated by Michaelis-Menten equation.

The following sentence in the Results sub-section the Measurement of Kinetic Parameters contained an associated error: “SyMDH displayed approximately 1.7-fold (kcat) and 350-fold (kcat/Km) preferences for oxaloacetate reduction over malate oxidation and approximately 4.7-fold (kcat) and 89.5-fold (kcat/Km) preferences for NADH oxidation over NAD+ reduction (Table 1).” This sentence should have read: “SyMDH displayed approximately 1.7-fold (kcat) and 361-fold (kcat/Km) preferences for oxaloacetate reduction over malate oxidation and approximately 4.7-fold (kcat) and 90.5-fold (kcat/Km) preferences for NADH oxidation over NAD+ reduction (Table 1).”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: biochemistry, cyanobacteria, malate dehydrogenase, metabolic enzyme, TCA cycle

Citation: Takeya M, Ito S, Sukigara H and Osanai T (2021) Corrigendum: Purification and Characterisation of Malate Dehydrogenase From Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: Biochemical Barrier of the Oxidative Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle. Front. Plant Sci. 12:699371. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.699371

Received: 23 April 2021; Accepted: 30 April 2021;
Published: 11 June 2021.

Edited and reviewed by: Peer Schenk, The University of Queensland, Australia

Copyright © 2021 Takeya, Ito, Sukigara and Osanai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Takashi Osanai, tosanai@meiji.ac.jp