Corrigendum: Museomics Unveil the Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Neglected Juan Fernandez Archipelago Megalachne and Podophorus Endemic Grasses and Their Connection With Relict Pampean-Ventanian Fescues

A Corrigendum on
Museomics Unveil the Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Neglected Juan Fernandez Archipelago Megalachne and Podophorus Endemic Grasses and Their Connection With Relict Pampean-Ventanian Fescues

by Moreno-Aguilar, M. F., Arnelas, I., Sánchez-Rodríguez, A., Viruel, J., and Catalán, P. (2020). Front. Plant Sci. 11:819. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00819

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1, Figures 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B and 5, Supplementary Figures 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2C and 3, and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2A as published. The name and authorship of Festuca fontqueri St-Yves were misspelled as Festuca fontqueriana (St-Yves) Romo.

TABLE 1

Table 1. List of taxa included in the phylogenomic study of the Fernandezian and other Loliinae grasses.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Maximum likelihood full plastome (A) and reduced plastome (B) trees constructed with IQTREE showing the relationships among the studied Fernandezian and Loliinae grasses. Oryza sativa was used to root the trees. Numbers indicate branches with UltraFast Bootstrap supports (BS) <100%; the remaining branches have 100% BS value.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Maximum likelihood nuclear rDNA cistron (A) and ITS (B) trees constructed with IQTREE showing the relationships among the studied Fernandezian and Loliinae grasses. Oryza sativa was used to root the trees. Numbers indicate branches with UltraFast Bootstrap supports (BS) <100%; the remaining branches have 100% BS value.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Estimated ancestral ranges and biogeographical events of the Fernandezian and other Loliinae grasses inferred from LAGRANGE under the stratified DEC models mapped on the BEAST2 maximum clade credibility tree with outgroups pruned from it. (A) Loliinae DEC model; (B) American-Vulpia-Pampas DEC model. The vertical dashed lines separate the four time slices (TSI-TSIV) used in the Lagrange analyses. The maps on the left represent the palaeogeographical configuration of the world in these four time periods and the arrows represent the dispersals between areas that reflect change in continental connectivity over time. The pie charts at the nodes indicate the relative probabilities for alternative ancestral ranges (with their color legends indicated at the respective inset charts). The inferred biogeographic events are indicated at the nodes (X/Y vicariance; X/Y peripheral isolation) and branches (X->Y dispersal; X^* extinction) of the tree. The Operational Areas assigned to the species are indicated to the right of the trees.

In addition, the GenBank accession codes of ITS, trnLF and trnTL DNA sequences of Avena fatua, Oryza sativa, Poa alpina, Secale cereale and Triticum aestivum were wrong in Supplementary Table 1.

The corrected Table 1, Figures 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B and 5 appear below and corrected Supplementary Figures 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 2A, 2B, 2C and 3, and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2A are published.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.