Abstract
The hornworts are a small group of land plants, consisting of only 11 families and approximately 220 species. Despite their small size as a group, their phylogenetic position and unique biology are of great importance. Hornworts, together with mosses and liverworts, form the monophyletic group of bryophytes that is sister to all other land plants (Tracheophytes). It is only recently that hornworts became amenable to experimental investigation with the establishment of Anthoceros agrestis as a model system. In this perspective, we summarize the recent advances in the development of A. agrestis as an experimental system and compare it with other plant model systems. We also discuss how A. agrestis can help to further research in comparative developmental studies across land plants and to solve key questions of plant biology associated with the colonization of the terrestrial environment. Finally, we explore the significance of A. agrestis in crop improvement and synthetic biology applications in general.
1 Introduction
As indicated by biochemical, morphological and molecular data, land plants evolved from aquatic green algae (Karol, 2001; Lewis and McCourt, 2004; Becker and Marin, 2009) around 500 million years ago. Land plants diverged into seven main groups: liverworts, mosses, hornworts, lycophytes, ferns, gymnosperms and angiosperms (Leebens-Mack et al., 2019). Our efforts to understand key events in the evolution of land plants are hindered by the fact that the majority of tractable land plant experimental systems belong to angiosperms (Szövényi et al., 2021). A few tractable non-seed plant models are available but only four are well-established: the fern Ceratopteris richardii (Plackett et al., 2015), the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha (Bowman et al., 2022), the moss Physcomitrium patens (Rensing et al., 2020) and very recently the hornwort Anthoceros agrestis (Szövényi et al., 2015; Frangedakis et al., 2021b). Liverworts, mosses and hornworts form the monophyletic group of bryophytes, a deeply divergent lineage of plants. The recent development of a hornwort model, A. agrestis, makes comparative studies employing model systems from each of these deeply divergent clades feasible for the first time. This can eventually provide a more accurate insight into major events of land plant evolution (Dolan, 2009; Donoghue et al., 2021; Frangedakis et al., 2021a). Importantly, the development of a transformation technique for A. agrestis, and for three additional species (Waller et al., 2022), paves the way for detailed molecular and genetic studies to elucidate hornwort biology. Furthermore, it opens the way to experimentally study the enigmatic features of hornworts that are absent or rarely occur in other land plants, such as the single algal-like chloroplast per cell or the basal sporophyte meristem (Villarreal and Renzaglia, 2015; Frangedakis et al., 2021a). In this review we first provide an overview of the recently developed tools that enable experimental work on hornworts. We then highlight the key aspects of hornwort biology and their significance for general plant biology, applied plant science and synthetic biology. Finally, we discuss the challenges that need to be tackled in the future.
2 The significance of hornworts in understanding key questions of land plant evolution
Current phylogenetic evidence strongly supports the idea that land plants comprise two major monophyletic clades, the vascular plants (tracheophytes) and the bryophytes (Puttick et al., 2018; Leebens-Mack et al., 2019; Harris et al., 2020; Su et al., 2021; Harris et al., 2022). There is also accumulating evidence that within bryophytes, the hornworts are sister to the monophyletic clade of mosses and liverworts (Setaphytes) with a divergence time of approximately 400 MYA (Harrison and Morris, 2018; Puttick et al., 2018; Harris et al., 2022). This new phylogenetic backbone is in stark contrast to the traditional view that treated bryophytes as a paraphyletic grade of mosses, liverworts and hornworts (Buck et al., 2008). Importantly it has also revolutionized the way we think about character evolution in land plants. Traditional evolutionary hypotheses suggested that the common ancestor of land plants had a simple morphology, probably similar to extant bryophytes (Buck et al., 2008; Gerrienne et al., 2016). However, the discovery of bryophyte monophyly makes statements about the complexity and nature of the land plant common ancestor as well as character evolution in land plants challenging (Puttick et al., 2018; Harris et al., 2022). The monophyly of bryophytes and vascular plants implies that the land plant common ancestor could have had a haploid-dominant, a diploid-dominant, or an isomorphic (haploid and diploid phases with comparable complexity) life cycle. Therefore, the haploid-dominant life cycle and the organizational level of bryophytes may not be the ancestral state and could be the result of a reductive evolutionary process (Bowman et al., 2016; Chater et al., 2016; Harris et al., 2020; Harris et al., 2022). This is supported by recent findings indicating that the evolution of bryophytes might have been accompanied by massive gene losses after the split from the common ancestor of land plants (Clark et al., 2022; Harris et al., 2022). Furthermore, the new phylogenetic backbone of bryophytes combined with both genomic and evo-devo studies also imply that various complex traits could have been gained and lost among the three deeply divergent clades of bryophytes (Li et al., 2020; Rensing, 2020; Clark et al., 2022; Harris et al., 2022). Therefore, it is important to have at least one tractable model species for each major lineage of bryophytes. This will help to recognize and study the evolution of traits shared by most bryophyte groups and vascular plants, identify ancestral traits only retained by a specific group of bryophytes, as well as traits representing bryophyte-specific innovations. Such comparative analyses became increasingly possible with the establishment of the new hornwort model A. agrestis.
3 The hornwort model Anthoceros agrestis
For hornworts, A. agrestis (Figure 1A) has recently emerged as the model experimental system, with two geographic isolates (Oxford and Bonn) being available (Szövényi et al., 2015). Both A. agrestis isolates are derived from a single spore and can be routinely grown axenically. High quality genome assemblies are available (Li et al., 2020) and an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method, using regenerating thallus fragments, has been developed (Frangedakis et al., 2021b; Waller et al., 2022). Up to 100 and 40 stable transgenic lines can be obtained from 0.2 g of tissue for the Oxford and Bonn isolate, respectively. Protoplast isolation and transient transformation protocols are also available (Neubauer et al., 2022). Finally, a new growth medium for A. agrestis has been developed, that yields four times more tissue mass compared to the traditionally used KNOP medium (Gunadi et al., 2022). For cloning, the OpenPlant toolkit (Sauret-Güeto et al., 2020) originally developed for M. polymorpha has been adopted. The OpenPlant kit is a Golden Gate Cloning method, based on Type IIS restriction enzymes, that enables the fast generation of complex DNA circuits from standardized basic DNA parts (e.g., promoters, coding sequences and terminators).
Figure 1
In addition to the widely used CaMV 35S promoter, two native constitutive promoters have been developed for A. agrestis, the promoter regions of the Elongation Factor 1 Alpha (Ef1a) and the Gamma Tonoplast Intrinsic Protein 1;1 (Tip1;1) genes (Frangedakis et al., 2021b; Waller et al., 2022). Hygromycin is used as an antibiotic selection marker and chlorsulfuron as a herbicide selection marker. Four fluorescent proteins (eGFP, mVenus, mTurquoise2 and mScarlet) can be expressed successfully in A. agrestis without toxic effects. A set of targeting peptides for subcellular localization into the chloroplast, mitochondria, Golgi, Endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisomes, nucleus, cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane are also available (Waller et al., 2022). The palette of hornwort species that can be genetically modified was recently expanded by the addition of Anthoceros punctatus, which has been used as a model for plant symbiosis with cyanobacteria, Leiosporoceros dussii, which is the sister to all other hornworts and Phaeoceros carolinianus (Waller et al., 2022).
4 A. agrestis compared to other model plants
A. agrestis like any other bryophyte, has a gametophyte/haploid dominant life cycle (Buck et al., 2008). Axenic tissue propagation is simple and achieved by careful fragmentation of thallus tissue (Szövényi et al., 2015), however, A. agrestis does not tolerate high light intensities (Frangedakis et al., 2021b). The thallus tissue can be stored at 4° C for up to two months. Sporophyte induction is more efficient in the case of the Bonn isolate compared to the Oxford isolate and it takes about 6 weeks for mature sporophytes to develop (Figure 1A). Mature sporophytes can be removed and stored at 4° C for up to six months. In A. agrestis genetic studies are made easier, compared to angiosperms, by its small gene families, lack of redundancy and a dominant haploid phase in its life cycle (Szövényi, 2016; Li et al., 2020). For transformation, thallus fragments are co-cultivated with Agrobacterium and successful transformants are visible within 4-6 weeks after antibiotic/herbicide selection. Finally, A. agrestis provides an accessible platform for live-tissue microscopy where cell division can be easily tracked. CRISPR/cas9 genome editing technology is currently under development.
Model systems have been available for many years for the other two bryophyte groups, liverworts and mosses. For liverworts, M. polymorpha is a well-established model species (Figure 1B). Agrobacterium based transformation techniques are available and stable transformants can be obtained in approximately two weeks (Ishizaki et al., 2008; Kubota et al., 2013). The genome of M. polymorpha is available (Bowman et al., 2017; Diop et al., 2020; Montgomery et al., 2020) including extensive transcriptomic resources that are currently being improved (Kawamura et al., 2022). Homologous recombination is also feasible in M. polymorpha, however, it is not as efficient as in the moss P. patens (Ishizaki et al., 2013). It takes up to 12 weeks for mature sporophytes to develop. CRISPR/cas9 technology for genome editing is also well established (Sugano et al., 2014; Sugano et al., 2018). Transformation protocols are also available for two other liverworts: Marchantia palacea, commonly used for mycorrhizal symbiosis studies (Rich et al., 2021), and Riccia fluitans (Althoff and Zachgo, 2020).
For mosses, P. patens has been established as a model in 1924 by Wettstein (Wettstein, 1924) representing one of the oldest land plant model systems with the most extensive genomic resources among bryophytes (Figure 1C). Effective methods for in vitro propagation, protoplast-based, and Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformations are available (Kammerer and Cove, 1996; Schaefer and Zrÿd, 1997; Cho et al., 1999; Li et al., 2010). Transgenic lines can be obtained in approximately 12 weeks. P. patens is unique for its ability to undergo homologous recombination with an efficiency similar to that of yeast (Schaefer and Zrÿd, 1997). It takes up to 10 weeks for mature sporophytes to develop, which is longer compared to A. agrestis. CRISPR/cas9 technology for genome editing is also available (Mallett et al., 2019; Guyon-Debast et al., 2021).
Other non-seed land plant model systems include lycophytes and ferns (Figure 1D). For lycophytes Selaginella moellendorffii has been proposed as a model and its genome was sequenced in 2011 (Banks et al., 2011). However, the lack of a transformation technique for S. moellendorffii and the length of time needed to complete its life cycle are major hurdles in genetic studies. For ferns, C. richardii was developed as a model system in 1960 (Hickok et al., 1987). C. richardii has a short life cycle under laboratory conditions, biolistic and Agrobacterium based transformation techniques (Plackett et al., 2014; Bui et al., 2015) are available and its genome was sequenced recently (Marchant et al., 2022). No CRISPR/cas9 protocol is available for editing C. richardii`s genome.
For angiosperms Arabidopsis thaliana is the system of choice (Figure 1D). Agrobacterium based transformation techniques are available and a high-quality reference genome is publicly available (http://www.arabidopsisbook.org/ and Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000). Its life cycle can be completed within 6-8 weeks and an extensive set of molecular tools and genome editing techniques have been available for a long time. Several gymnosperm genomes are available (Rigault et al., 2011; Nystedt et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2021), however, their size and the length of their life cycles are major obstacles for laboratory-based experimentation.
Multiple model systems are available for green algae (Figure 1D). The most frequently used system is the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for which a genome assembly (Merchant et al., 2007) and efficient genetic transformation methods are available (Mussgnug, 2015). Chara braunii (Nishiyama et al., 2018) and Spirogloea muscicola (Cheng et al., 2019) have been proposed as multicellular green algae models, however despite their genomes being sequenced, genetic manipulation is still challenging.
Altogether, the hornwort model system performs well in comparison to other plant model (Figure 1D) systems in terms of ease of growth in laboratory conditions, life-cycle length and transformation efficiency. Nevertheless, important molecular tools, routinely used in the other two land plant models, are still under development.
5 The unique biology of hornworts
Hornworts have a handful of unique traits absent from other bryophytes or even any other land plants. The unique traits of hornworts include but are not restricted to (Figures 2, 3A): (i) zygote and sporophyte development, (ii) a single chloroplast per cell, (iii) high-rates of RNA-editing and reverse editing, (iv) a pyrenoid based carbon concentrating mechanism, and (v) symbiotic relationships with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and cyanobacteria.
Figure 2
Figure 3
Hornworts comprise 11 families/genera which include: Leiosporoceros, Anthoceros, Folioceros, Paraphymatoceros, Phaeoceros, Notothylas, Phymatoceros, Phaeomegaceros, Nothoceros, Megaceros and Dendroceros (Figure 3B) (Villarreal and Renner, 2012). Interestingly, some of the unique hornwort characters vary even between different families. For example, the number of chloroplasts per cell or the presence of pyrenoids, stomata and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (Villarreal and Renner, 2012; Desiro et al., 2013; Frangedakis et al., 2021a; MacLeod et al., 2022) (Figure 3B). Thus, comparative studies within hornworts can help identify the genetic mechanisms that control these characters.
5.1 Zygote and sporophyte development
The orientation of the first zygote division in hornworts is longitudinal compared to the longitudinal axis of the archegonium unlike other land plants, with the exception of leptosporangiate ferns (Johnson et al., 2009) (Figures 2A, 3A). The functional significance of this unique hornwort feature is unclear. It is hypothesized that the longitudinal division is a consequence of anatomical and mechanistic constraints (Shaw and Renzaglia, 2004). Unlike in mosses and liverworts where archegonia are superficial, hornwort archegonia and the zygotes are sunken in the gametophyte thallus and surrounded by gametophyte tissues. This mechanical constraint may have led to changing direction of the first division plane in hornworts and have likely independently evolved in leptosporangiate ferns (Johnson et al., 2009). Nevertheless, this hypothesis needs further testing and the genetic networks determining the first division plane must be thoroughly investigated. A potential component of such networks is the A. agrestis single FLORICAULA/LEAFY (FLO/LFY) gene, homologs of which have been shown to be necessary for the first zygotic division in P. patens (Maizel, 2005; Tanahashi et al., 2005).
Hornwort sporophytes are also unique amongst other bryophytes (Figures 4A–C) and land plants in general. A remarkable feature of the hornwort sporophyte is that most of it is formed by a multicellular basal meristem (Ligrone et al., 2012a) (Figures 2A, 3A, 4D). By contrast, the sporophyte of P. patens develops from an apical cell, a transient intercalary meristem, and various secondary meristems (Bower, 1935; Smith, 1955; Wardlaw, 1955; Kato and Akiyama, 2005; Lopez-Obando et al., 2022). Sporophyte tissues of the liverwort M. polymorpha do not contain a well-defined meristematic region (Ligrone et al., 2012a; Szövényi et al., 2019). The hornwort multicellular meristem is located at the base of the sporophyte, just above the foot connecting the sporophyte to the gametophyte, and continuously produces cells upwards that differentiate into the various cell types of the sporophyte (Bartlett, 1928; Ligrone et al., 2012a; Field et al., 2015). More specifically, the internal structure of the basal meristem resembles that of the root apical meristem of vascular plants (Ligrone et al., 2012a; Uchida and Torii, 2019; Dubrovsky and Vissenberg, 2021). Cells derived from the basal meristem are arranged in well-defined rows (Figure 2A, circles in 3D view) that give rise to the various tissue types of the sporophyte: the columella, the sporogenous tissue, the assimilative tissue and the epidermis. Each row consists of basally arranged meristematic cells that continuously differentiate into the major tissue types towards the apex of the sporophyte. Very little is known about the molecular mechanisms governing the development of this meristem and its evolutionary homology to the multicellular meristems of land plants is highly debated (Ligrone et al., 2012a; Ligrone et al., 2012b; Harrison and Morris, 2018; Fouracre and Harrison, 2022). Nevertheless, the continuous differentiation gradient present along the longitudinal axis of the sporophyte provides an excellent model to understand conserved features of cell fate determination across bryophytes and vascular plants, and potentially the origin of multicellular meristems in vascular plants.
Figure 4
The genetic network underlying the establishment and maintenance of the hornwort sporophyte meristem is poorly understood. KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX (KNOX1) genes known to be critical for sporophyte development in P. patens (Sakakibara et al., 2008) and embryo formation in liverworts (Dierschke et al., 2021) are not present in the genome of A. agrestis (Li et al., 2020). While KNOX1 genes are missing from the A. agrestis genome, a single KNOX2 gene is present and preferentially expressed during sporophyte development. It can be speculated that the hornwort KNOX2 gene may be able to compensate for the function of the absent KNOX1 gene, however functional verification is needed to confirm such a hypothesis.
In angiosperms, a negative feedback pathway involving CLAVATA genes and the WUSCHEL transcription factor maintains the stem-cell population in the shoot apical meristem (SAM). In A. thaliana there are three CLAVATA genes, CLV1, CLV2 and CLV3. CLV3 encodes a small secreted protein and is expressed in the L1 and L2 layers of the SAM central zone while CLV1 and CLV2 genes encode receptor-like proteins and are expressed mainly in the L3 (Clark et al., 1997; Jeong et al., 1999). CLV3 interacts with CLV1 and CLV2 (Müller et al., 2008) to limit the WUS expression zone and consequently to limit the size of the stem cell/central zone (Reddy and Meyerowitz, 2005). Finally, WUS positively regulates CLV3 activity, generating a feedback loop that stabilizes stem cell activity in the SAM. CLAVATA3/Embryo Surrounding Region-Related (CLE) peptides have been shown to promote the formation of gametophyte apical cells in M. polymorpha (Hirakawa et al., 2020; Hirakawa, 2022) and to antagonize stem cell formation in P. patens gametophyte (Cammarata et al., 2022). More recently, it has been shown that some CLE peptides (CLE40 in Arabidopsis) also have the capacity to promote meristematic activity in angiosperms (Schlegel et al., 2021), contrary to their canonical role antagonizing the meristem via WUSCHEL repression. Thus, experimental studies of CLE peptide/CLV receptors in hornworts will further clarify whether CLE peptides repressed or promoted meristematic activity in the land plant ancestor.
YABBY transcription factors have been shown to be involved in the regulation of lateral organ development, the proper maintenance of the SAM and initiation of axillary meristems in flowering plants (Bowman and Smyth, 1999; Siegfried et al., 1999; Kumaran et al., 2002; Goldshmidt et al., 2008; Tanaka et al., 2012). A YABBY gene has also been shown to be expressed in the simplex SAM, the microphyll primordia and the sporangium-primordia of the lycophyte Huperzia selago (Evkaikina et al., 2017). While no YABBY genes were found in P. patens or M. polymorpha, a single YABBY gene has been shown to be expressed in a sporophyte specific manner in the hornwort A. agrestis (Li et al., 2020). Investigating the functional role of the single hornwort YABBY gene will give insight into its potential role during basal meristem regulation and thus about the role of YABBY transcription factors during the evolution of land plant body plans in general.
The hornwort sporophyte also bears stomata (Figures 2A, 3A). Stomata also occur in mosses but are absent in liverworts. (Renzaglia et al., 2017; Harrison and Morris, 2018; Clark et al., 2022). Unlike stomata of vascular plants, stomata of hornworts do not respond to environmental cues, they remain open once the stomata pore is formed and eventually collapse, facilitating sporophyte dehiscence and subsequent spore dispersal. In mosses stomata also play a role in sporophyte dehiscence but do respond to environmental cues such as light and abscisic acid (Chater et al., 2011; Lind et al., 2015). While the function and morphological features of moss stomata differ from those of vascular plants, their development is regulated by a set of orthologous genes (Pressel et al., 2014; Chater et al., 2017; Clark et al., 2022). The development, morphology and function of hornwort stomata further differs from those of mosses but shows remarkable similarity to Silurian-Devonian early land plant fossils (Edwards et al., 1998; Renzaglia et al., 2017). Elucidating the function of stomata in hornworts and determining the genetic network driving their development will help to resolve the long-standing debate about the ancestral function of stomata.
Studies of hornwort sporophytes can also help to understand the evolution and developmental biology of some unique features of bryophytes. For instance, both liverwort and hornwort sporophytes contain so-called elaters/pseudoelaters (elaters in liverworts and pseudoelaters in hornworts) aiding spore dispersal, while such structures are absent (likely lost) in all mosses (Ligrone et al., 2012a). Similarly, while most moss sporophytes contain a special opening structure (the annulus) enabling controlled dehiscence and regulated release of spores, most liverwort and all hornwort sporophytes open along two or more preformed slits (Crandall-Stotler and Stotler, 2008; Renzaglia et al., 2009). Additionally, while moss, liverwort and hornwort sporophytes are all nurtured by the gametophyte, nutrient transfer cells occur only in the gametophyte of hornworts while they are present in both the gametophyte and sporophyte tissues of several mosses and liverworts (Alfayate et al., 2000; Buck and Goffinet, 2000; Carafa et al., 2003; Crandall-Stotler and Stotler, 2008; Villarreal and Renzaglia, 2015). Finally, unlike mosses and liverworts, hornworts lack both water- and nutrient-conducting cells (Ligrone et al., 2000), with the evolutionary, physiological, and developmental aspects of this still not understood.
5.2 Chloroplast
5.2.1 Monoplastidy-polyplastidy
Chloroplasts originated from an endosymbiotic event between a cyanobacterium and a eukaryotic cell over one billion years ago (Archibald, 2009). The ancient organism that resulted from the endosymbiotic event evolved into three main groups: 1) the Glaucophyta, 2) the Rhodophyta (red algae) and 3) the Viridiplantae (green algae and land plants), with various secondary endosymbiosis events giving rise to other algal groups such as stramenopiles and haptophytes (Keeling, 2004; de Vries and Gould, 2018). Gene transfers from the genome of the endosymbiotic cyanobacterium to the nuclear genome of the eukaryotic host saw the cyanobacterium progressively losing independence, thus evolving into a plastid (Bock and Timmis, 2008; de Vries et al., 2016; de Vries and Gould, 2018). However, this process remains incomplete: eukaryotic cells cannot produce a plastid de novo and only a plastid can make a new plastid by dividing via binary fission. Therefore, a daughter cell must inherit a plastid from its mother cell, otherwise the daughter cell lineage would be in an aplastidic state (de Vries and Gould, 2018). One solution is to have only one chloroplast per cell (monoplastidy) and to tightly link plastid division to cell division. Plastid division gene expression is coupled to cell cycle gene expression, with the mother cell only dividing once the chloroplast has multiplied so there is one chloroplast ready and available for each daughter cell. Most algal lineages are monoplastidic, including all the unicellular, basal branching groups in the chlorophyte green algae (de Vries and Gould, 2018). Some groups have escaped this bottleneck to evolve into a condition with multiple chloroplasts per cell: polyplastidy. This innovation appears to have evolved several times in photosynthetic eukaryotes, including within the streptophyte lineage that gave rise to the land plants (de Vries et al., 2016). Polyplastidy is suggested to be linked to the transfer of the plastid division minicell genes MinD and MinE from the chloroplast to the nuclear genome (Lopez-Juez and Pyke, 2005; de Vries and Gould, 2018). The increase in the number of plastids per cell coincided with the transition to terrestrial ecosystems and aided the development of macroscopic growth forms with specialized photosynthetic tissues. Multiple chloroplasts per cell allows for better photosynthetic efficiency and adaptation to variable environmental light conditions (Park et al., 1996; Königer et al., 2008; Ogasawara et al., 2013) in ways that are more difficult to achieve with the monoplastidic condition (Vaughn et al., 1992). Polyplastidic cells have a greater degree of back-up in case of damage or deleterious mutations in the chloroplast (Dutta et al., 2017; de Vries and Gould, 2018). The emergence of more complex body plans in vascular plants and seed plants also saw the evolution of new plastid types beyond the chloroplast (de Vries et al., 2016).
How polyplastidy evolved is poorly understood, and hornworts represent the ideal system to tackle this question. Most hornwort species, including the fully sequenced Anthoceros species, are monoplastidic (Figures 2B, 3B, 4E), however some groups (e.g., Megaceros) are polyplastidic. Phylogenetic mapping suggests that bryophytes were originally polyplastidic, and within hornworts (Figure 3B) there were multiple independent transitions to monoplastidy (MacLeod et al., 2022). This provides opportunities to study the mono/polyplastidic transition both amongst the hornworts and within the bryophytes, with liverworts (for example the polyplastidic M. polymorpha, Figure 4F) and mosses providing convenient outgroups for comparison. By contrast such transitions are rare in other land plant groups (e.g. the giant plastids of the bizonoplast lycophytes, (Liu et al., 2020)). Furthermore, there are also cases of mono/polyplastidic transitions within one hornwort species, for example during Megaceros meristem regeneration. During the formation of an undifferentiated callus-like stage, the usual polyplastidic condition reverts to monoplastidy via an association between the chloroplast and nucleus that produces asymmetric cell divisions. After the emergence of apical cells and meristematic growth the usual polyplastidic state is restored (Burr, 1969). A similar transition from a polyplastidic to a monoplastidic conditions occurs in liverworts, such as M. polymorpha. Sporocytes (the cells that give rise to spores) have a single chloroplast per cells but during meiosis, they make a transition from a monoplastidic to a polyplastidic state (Renzaglia et al., 1994; Shimamura, 2016). Exploring the mechanism governing such transitions can provide insight into the evolution of polyplastidy.
In land plants, plastid division is largely independent from the cell cycle. However, the two processes cannot be entirely decoupled to avoid mis-segregation between daughter cells and the loss of plastids in one lineage. Birky’s model (Birky, 1983; Birky and Skavaril, 1984; Birky, 2001) suggests a way of controlling for this: if plastids occupy a sufficient percentage of cell volume (50%) or if there are a large enough number of plastids (>6) then the probability of inheritance is such that it is almost certain that each daughter cell will have at least one plastid, and from this can produce new additional plastids. Yet it is still unknown how land plant cells sense the number or size of the plastids they contain, or what the molecular mechanism linking plastid and cell division is. The process of plastid division by binary fission is carried out by the formation of contractile rings that are linked across the plastid inner and outer envelopes. The genes involved in the formation and function of these divisional rings are a combination of those inherited from the cyanobacterial ancestor (e.g. MinD, MinE) and innovations from the eukaryotic host (e.g. Plastid Division (PDV) genes) (Chen F. et al., 2018). Bryophytes also have a more streamlined repertoire of plastid-related genes versus model angiosperm species. This smaller gene repertoire, together with lineage-specific gene losses, provides a useful avenue to investigate their role in polyplastidy evolution. There have also been losses of plastid-related genes specifically within hornworts (MacLeod et al., 2022). Most notable in this regard are the distributions of Accumulation and Replication of Chloroplasts 3 (ARC3) and the Filamentous Temperature Sensitive Z (FtsZ) gene family (FtsZ 1, 2 and 3) in hornworts. All green algae and land plants possess FtsZ genes. Within the bryophytes, mosses such as P. patens have multiple FtsZ genes (two FtsZ1, two FtsZ2 and one FtsZ3), while liverworts (e.g. M. polymorpha) have one copy of each of FtsZ1, FtsZ2 and FtsZ3 (Grosche and Rensing, 2017). ARC3 appeared early in chlorophyte evolution and is found throughout the land plants, with rare exceptions e.g. P. patens (though this may be compensated for by a MinC-like gene) (Miyagishima et al., 2011; Osteryoung and Pyke, 2014). Crucially, all hornworts analyzed thus far only possess a copy of FtsZ1 and FtsZ3, that is, they lack FtsZ2, and have lost ARC3 (MacLeod et al., 2022). ftsZ2 and arc3 mutants in A. thaliana and P. patens have impaired chloroplast division dynamics, displaying extreme phenotypes of large, misshapen chloroplasts (Martin et al., 2009; Schmitz et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2013). The unique hornwort situation has been suggested to be a crucial factor in the evolution of monoplastidy, analogous to the A. thaliana and P. patens ftsZ2 and arc3 mutants. Another interesting observation is that the nucleus in an A. agrestis cell is always next to the plastid (Figure 4G). In addition, A. agrestis lines with the actin fluorescently labeled, reveal a close interaction of the actin-cytoskeleton with the chloroplast (Figure 4H). These observations point towards a potential mechanism that allows the coordination of plastid with cell division potentially via links with the cytoskeleton. Thus, hornworts provide a natural laboratory with simple, accessible systems to study FtsZ protein functions, FtsZ-ARC3 interactions, and the nucleus-plastid coordination.
Hornworts also provide an attractive system to study the least investigated FtsZ gene, FtsZ3, which is found in streptophyte green algae, bryophytes and lycophytes, but has been lost in ferns and seed plants (gymnosperms and angiosperms) (Grosche and Rensing, 2017) FtsZ3 differs from FtsZ1 or 2 in that the protein is localized to both the chloroplast and the cytoplasm in P. patens. PpftsZ3 mutants possess misshapen chloroplasts and impaired phyllid growth, again distinct from phenotypes in ftsz1 or ftsz2 mutants (Martin et al., 2009). The fact that most traditional model plant species lack FtsZ3 has hindered investigation into its function, yet the fact that it is ancestral in land plants makes it important in understanding the evolution of plastids and chloroplast division. One observation is that FtsZ3 is correlated with a peptidoglycan layer between the chloroplast inner and outer envelopes, as is the case in cyanobacterial cell walls (and presumably in the ancestral endosymbiont). The suggestion is that FtsZ3 is somehow involved in forming or coordinating the peptidoglycan layer during plastid division (Grosche and Rensing, 2017), but the details surrounding this remain unclear (Chen C. et al., 2018). Hornworts provide an excellent opportunity to tackle this issue, having large, easily observable chloroplasts, established transgenic protocols and a single FtsZ3 gene.
How polyplastidy evolved and controlled is a question of fundamental interest in plant biology, and the answers hold enormous biotechnological promise. Eventually controlling polyplastidy could facilitate applications such as the engineering of C4 traits in C3 crop species (e.g. to increase the chloroplast compliment in bundle sheath cells (Schuler et al., 2016; Stata et al., 2016)), manipulating plastid type interchange (Jarvis and López-Juez, 2013; Daniell et al., 2016; Solymosi et al., 2018) or producing morphologically-tailored plastids optimized for synthetic biology and protein biosynthesis (Daniell et al., 2016; Frangedakis et al., 2021c). Hornworts therefore represent a key system to study the regulatory mechanisms of chloroplast division, size and segregation, a “rosetta stone” for understanding the evolution of polyplastidy in land plants.
5.2.2 Stromules
Hornworts allow other aspects of chloroplast morphology and function to be explored. One example of this are the numerous, prominent projections that extend from hornwort chloroplasts (see arrows, Figure 4E). These projections have been termed stromules (Frangedakis et al., 2021a), under the assumption that they are homologous and functionally equivalent to stromules in other plant groups (Gray et al., 2001; Natesan, 2005). Stromules are projections from plastids and can form independent of the cytoskeleton, in isolated chloroplasts (Brunkard et al., 2015). Despite a long history of observation (Gray et al., 2001), even in model angiosperm species such as A. thaliana and tomato, stromule biology remains mysterious (Waters et al., 2004; Schattat et al., 2012). There is experimental evidence for stromules having a role in chromoplasts during fruit ripening (Waters et al., 2004) and a role in reactive oxygen signaling during immune responses (Caplan et al., 2015), but other suggested functions in inter-plastid connectivity have been disproven (Schattat et al., 2012). In general, there is an inverse relationship between stromules and plastid density (Waters et al., 2004), including in chloroplast division mutants (Holzinger et al., 2008), and this is also the case for monoplastidic hornworts (Frangedakis et al., 2021a). This points towards stromules being involved in increasing chloroplast surface area, possibly for transfer of substances to/from the cytoplasm. This would be of greater importance for large hornwort chloroplasts, considering their high volume-surface area ratio. The A. agrestis genome has homologs of known stromule-related genes, such as the Chloroplast Outer Envelope Protein 1 (Caplan et al., 2015), a prime target for further study.
5.3 RNA editing
RNA editing refers to the conversion of cytidine (C) to uridine (U) in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts (Maier et al., 1996; Gott and Emeson, 2000) and is found in most land plants including hornworts, but not in green algae (Figure 3A). C-to-U RNA editing is mediated by nuclear encoded proteins called Pentatricopeptide Repeat (PPR) proteins. Hornwort plastid genomes are unique, having one of the highest RNA editing rates amongst land plants executed by over 1400 PPR proteins (Gutmann et al., 2020). Furthermore, RNA editing rates appear to be variable within hornworts, providing a unique opportunity to investigate the relationship between PPR protein diversification and RNA editing rates (Kugita et al., 2003; Juan Carlos Villarreal et al., 2018; Gerke et al., 2020). Hornworts also exhibit a special type of RNA editing, called reverse editing (U-to-C), which is otherwise found only in some lycophytes and ferns (Knie et al., 2016; Knoop, 2022) (Figure 3A). Genetic studies in hornworts can provide valuable insight into the molecular basis and biological significance of this poorly understood phenomenon (Bernath-Levin et al., 2021).
Plant lineages capable of reverse editing, including hornworts, have evolved special types of PPR proteins (Gerke et al., 2020; Gutmann et al., 2020). Reverse RNA editing PPR proteins are of particular interest since they might have applications in chloroplast engineering similar to C-to-U RNA editing PPR proteins (Bernath-Levin et al., 2021; McDowell et al., 2022). For example, it has recently been reported that synthetic PPR proteins can be used to specifically direct C-to-U RNA editing in the chloroplast (Royan et al., 2021) Similarly, hornwort reverse RNA editing PPR proteins have also the potential to be engineered to direct reverse U-to-C editing, offering additional tools for the control of chloroplast transgenes.
5.4 Carbon concentrating mechanisms
To improve photosynthetic efficiency, various organisms have evolved mechanisms to increase intracellular carbon concentration. CO2 fixation is usually limited by the low CO2 attraction (Whitney et al., 2011) and catalytic rate (Bar-Even et al., 2011) of the Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) enzyme, and can be compensated by a mechanism, called carbon concentrating mechanism (CCM), that increases the CO2 concentration in the immediate vicinity of RuBisCO (Tcherkez et al., 2006). While this is achieved by employing complex multicellular structures in C4 and CAM plants, various algae and a single lineage of land pants, the hornworts, carry out biophysical carbon concentration at a single cell level in pyrenoids (Figure 3A) (Li et al., 2017). Pyrenoids are a chloroplast based biophysical CCM that incorporates transporters to actively move into the chloroplast, which is then converted into CO2 and concentrated around RuBisCO (Li et al., 2017; Meyer et al., 2017; Barrett et al., 2021).
To date, information on biophysical CCM and pyrenoid biology is mainly available for the unicellular alga C. reinhardtii and very little is known about hornwort pyrenoids (Barrett et al., 2021). Pyrenoids have repeatedly been gained and lost over the course of hornwort evolution (Figure 3B) enabling comparative analyses of pyrenoid-bearing and pyrenoid-absent species (Villarreal and Renner, 2012). This framework, combined with the currently established transformation techniques, provides an ideal opportunity to answer key questions related to pyrenoids in hornworts as well as to reveal conserved and divergent features with C. reinhardtii (Li et al., 2017; Frangedakis et al., 2021b; Waller et al., 2022). In particular:
(i) Measurements indicate that pyrenoid-bearing hornworts carry out active carbon concentration (Smith E. and Griffiths, 1996; Smith E. C. and Griffiths, 1996; Smith and Griffiths, 2000; Hanson et al., 2002; Meyer et al., 2008). Nevertheless, whether the CCM is inducible or rather constitutive is poorly known. Furthermore, the ultimate factors inducing CCM and their biological significance are unknown. Past and present atmospheric CO2 concentrations and habitat do not seem to correlate with the presence/absence of pyrenoids and CCM in hornworts (Villarreal and Renner, 2012). (ii) Pyrenoids are highly dynamic liquid phase separated structures in C. reinhardtii. By contrast, hornwort pyrenoids appear to be more stable and whether they form liquid phase separated bodies is unclear (Ligrone and Fioretto, 1987). (iii) Pyrenoids in C. reinhardtii consist mainly of RuBisCO scaffolded by a special protein matrix (Mackinder et al., 2016). While RuBisCO is concentrated in the pyrenoid in pyrenoid-bearing hornwort species and dispersed in the stroma in pyrenoid-absent species, the mechanism of pyrenoid assembly and components of the pyrenoid matrix are unknown (Vaughn et al., 1990; Vaughn et al., 1992). Whether pyrenoid assembly in hornworts occurs in an analogous way to C. reinhardtii is unclear (Barrett et al., 2021). (iii) Finally, the overall molecular mechanisms, the various enzymes/channels, and their localization within the hornwort cell and chloroplast are unknown and remain to be investigated.
Currently, there are attempts towards engineering algal pyrenoids into crops. This mainly includes proof of concept application in A. thaliana and tobacco (Adler et al., 2022). For example, engineering a chimeric A. thaliana RuBisCO by replacement of the two surface α-helices of its small subunit (S-subunit) with those of C. reinhardtii, results in a functional RuBisCO (Atkinson et al., 2017). C. reinhardtii RuBisCO S-subunit contains surface α-helices that have been shown to be necessary for the recruitment of RuBisCO into the pyrenoid via the interaction with the essential pyrenoid component 1 (EPYC1) (Engel et al., 2015; Mackinder et al., 2016). Recent evidence shows that co-expression of the chimeric A. thaliana RuBisCO with C. reinhardtii EPYC1 can result in functional pyrenoid-like structures in A. thaliana chloroplast (Atkinson et al., 2020). Given the vast evolutionary time separating chlorophytes from angiosperm crop species it can be hypothesized that it might be an easier endeavor to engineer a hornwort type pyrenoid into crops. Because the amino acid sequence of the hornwort RuBisCO S-subunit α-helices is more similar to that of A. thaliana compared to the C. reinhardtii one, introducing a hornwort EPYC1 analog to crops may induce pyrenoid formation with the native RuBisCO. Furthermore, pyrenoids produced this way may be more stable and have better biochemical properties than those induced using chimeric RuBisCO molecules and scaffolding proteins of algal origin.
5.5 Symbiotic interactions
Hornworts form beneficial (mutualistic) associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and cyanobacteria (Adams and Duggan, 2008; Rimington et al., 2020) (Figures 2C, 3B). In exchange for photosynthetic carbon, the plant gains fixed nitrogen or phosphorus (Enderlin and Meeks, 1983; Desiro et al., 2013). These associations of plants with AM fungi and cyanobacteria played an important role in land plant evolution (Delaux and Schornack, 2021). Supplying the plants with essential nutrients might have enabled the adaptation to a terrestrial life in which organic matter was scarce (Rensing, 2018; Puginier et al., 2022).
5.5.1 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Most hornwort species form a symbiosis with fungal partners (Figure 3B) (Desiro et al., 2013; Hoysted et al., 2017; Rimington et al., 2020). These associations involve two Mucoromycota subphyla, Mucoromycotina (that colonize 69% of hornworts) and Glomeromycotina (that colonize 78% of hornworts) (Rimington et al., 2020). Both the Glomeromycotina and Mucoromycotina are known to have played a key role in the plant adaptation to the land (Puginier et al., 2022). Often these different types of AM fungi occur simultaneously in the same thallus (Desiro et al., 2013). Fungal hyphae penetrate all parts of the thallus and occur inter- and intracellularly. Sometimes, the hyphae even interact with the cyanobacteria colonies (see next section) present in the mucilage cavities. While most hornwort species form a symbiosis with fungal partners, some species have apparently lost these symbioses (Read et al., 2000; Desiro et al., 2013). For example, the sister to all other hornworts L. dussii, has never been recorded in association with a fungus. In contrast, the family of Phymatocerotaceae has only been reported to occur in “a fungal association” (Rimington et al., 2020). Despite the presence of AM fungi in hornworts being well-documented using both morphological and molecular data (Schüßler, 2000; Desiro et al., 2013; Rimington et al., 2020), very little is known about the functional aspects of symbiosis and its underlying regulatory networks. The sequenced Anthoceros genomes contain the full complement (orthologs/homologs) of major common symbiosis pathway genes necessary to regulate the signaling between the host plant and the symbiont (Li et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the conservation of genetic networks governing the initiation, establishment and stabilization of symbiotic interaction has yet to be investigated. Evidence is mounting that the common ancestor of all land plants was capable of establishing symbiosis with AM fungi (Rich et al., 2021). Information about the gene network regulating AM fungal interactions in liverworts is emerging (Radhakrishnan et al., 2020; Rich et al., 2021; Kodama et al., 2022). However, due to the deep divergence between hornworts and liverworts some findings may represent liverwort-specific innovations and cannot be generalized. Therefore, establishing a hornwort system to study AM fungal interactions is of high significance. Revealing conserved regulatory mechanisms shared by hornworts and other land plants will help to reconstruct the ancestral symbiosis molecular tool kit. A hornwort study system will also enable studying the potential three-way interaction between plant host, cyanobacteria, and AM fungi. To do so, research in isolating AM fungi from various hornworts is in progress and initial experiments indicate that the symbiotic interaction can be reconstituted under axenic conditions (Ono et al., 1992).
5.5.2 Cyanobacteria
Hornworts also establish a symbiosis with cyanobacteria providing the host plant with fixed nitrogen in exchange for photosynthates (Figures 2C, 3B, 4I) (Meeks and Elhai, 2002; Adams and Duggan, 2008). Unlike plant interaction with AM fungi, the endophytic interaction between plants and cyanobacteria is rarer and seems to have evolved independently in just a few phylogenetically diverse groups of land plants: in bryophytes (all hornworts and two species of liverworts), ferns (Azolla), gymnosperms (Cycads), and angiosperms (Gunnera and Oryza) (Meeks, 1998; Meeks and Elhai, 2002; Santi et al., 2013; Álvarez et al., 2020).
The cyanobionts hosted by hornworts are usually from the genus Nostoc spp. (Adams and Duggan, 2008) but can be phylogenetically diverse (Nelson et al., 2021; Rahmatpour et al., 2021). Hornworts host the cyanobacteria in mucilage cavities that can be accessed through ventral mucilage clefts, which superficially resemble stomata (Renzaglia et al., 2000; Villarreal A and Renzaglia, 2006). An exception is L. dussii that hosts cyanobacteria in canals that branch and form an integrated network within the thallus (de Vries and de Vries; Meeks, 2003).
Initiation of the cyanobacteria-plant symbiosis requires mobilization and chemical attraction of cyanobacteria. In the majority of plant-cyanobacteria symbioses this is achieved by molecules collectively called hormogonia-inducing factors (HIF) that are produced by the plant host and transform the cyanobacterial cells to hormogonia. Hormogonia are motile cells that can detach from the parent organism and function as dispersal units (Adams and Duggan, 2008; Liu and Rousk, 2022; Rousk, 2022). The hornwort-cyanobacteria symbiosis is relatively easy to reconstruct under axenic conditions, with A. punctatus being used as the model system to study the morphological, functional, molecular, and chemical processes underlying the symbiosis (Enderlin and Meeks, 1983). In A. punctatus (Enderlin and Meeks, 1983), a HIF is released when the hornwort is deprived of fixed nitrogen, enabling the colonization of the cyanobiont (Campbell and Meeks, 1989). Once the mucilage-rich cavities are colonized, the hornwort releases a hormogonia-repressing factor triggering the production of vegetative cyanobacterial filaments enriched with specialized N-fixing cells, the heterocysts (Campbell et al., 1997). While the cyanobacterial genes regulating symbiosis initiation, establishment, and stabilization are relatively well-investigated, very little is known about the host (de Vries and de Vries). It is thought that attraction of the cyanobiont may rely on some mechanisms conserved across the diverse lineages of land plants in which endophytic plant-cyanobacteria symbiosis occur (de Vries and de Vries). A recent RNA sequencing study identified a suite of candidate genes that might mediate the hornwort-cyanobacteria symbiotic relationship (Li et al., 2020; Chatterjee et al., 2022). These include a SWEET transporter, receptor kinases, and transcription factors but many questions remain to be answered.
Experimental tractability of the hornwort-cyanobacteria model system and the ability to genetically transform A. punctatus (Frangedakis et al., 2021b; Waller et al., 2022) will enable detailed exploration of various aspects of the symbiotic interaction in detail. Firstly, one could use this system to clarify how nitrogen starvation preconditions the host plants to attract and establish the initial interaction with the cyanobiont. It was hypothesized that symbiont attraction could have evolved by the extension of a conserved nutrient starvation response mechanism (Isidra-Arellano et al., 2021). Furthermore, forward genetic experiments could be used to identify the genes necessary for the initiation, establishment, and stabilization of the symbiotic interaction. Finally, reverse genetic tools could be employed to functionally verify the effect of candidate genes. Collectively, the hornwort-cyanobacteria system provides a tractable tool to thoroughly explore the origin and evolution of plant-cyanobacteria interactions.
It is expected that this knowledge can be used in the future to engineer crops capable of initiating the mutualistic interaction with cyanobacteria (Liu and Rousk, 2022; Rousk, 2022). This type of interaction has received increasing interest in recent years due to its significant translational potential to boost crop yield without applying additional artificial fertilizer (Alvarenga and Rousk, 2022; Rousk, 2022). Compared to AM fungi, cyanobacteria, especially the members of the genus Nostoc dominantly present in hornworts, are less dependent on the host, do not necessarily require specialized plant structures like arbuscules, and therefore hold a promising translational potential (Adams and Duggan, 2008).
5.6 Photoreceptors and flavonoids
Hornworts have a unique photoreceptor called neochrome, which is a chimeric gene composed of a red/far-red-sensing module from a phytochrome and a blue-sensing phototropin (Li et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015). Apart from hornworts, neochrome is only found in ferns (Figure 3A). Interestingly, it has been proposed that ferns acquired neochrome by horizontal gene transfer from hornworts (Li et al., 2014). It remains to be understood whether the function of neochrome in hornworts is similar to ferns, where it increases light sensitivity by perceiving both red and blue light signals and ultimately mediates phototropism and chloroplast relocation (Kawai et al., 2003; Suetsugu et al., 2005; Li et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015).
Hornworts do not produce flavonoids (Davies et al., 2020) (Figure 3A). Flavonoids are polyphenolic secondary metabolite compounds with approximately 8000 being reported so far in land plants (Andersen and Markham, 2005). Flavonoids play a wide variety of important roles, ranging from UV radiation and pathogen protection to providing color to flowers and fruits to attract pollinators and seed dispersers. It is hypothesized that the evolution of flavonoid biosynthesis pathways coincided with the transition of plants to terrestrial ecosystems and that flavonoid biosynthetic pathways were present in the common ancestor of all land plants. The presence of degenerated sequences of genes encoding enzymes that catalyze the initial steps of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in A. agrestis and A. punctatus genomes suggest that the absence of flavonoids in hornworts likely represents a secondary loss. However, functional analysis is needed to confirm whether or not those genes that are present in hornworts can compensate for homologous genes in other plant groups and still produce functional enzymes.
6 Current challenges and conclusions
While significant advancements have been made in the last ten years in the genetic manipulation of hornworts, many challenges remain to be tackled in the future. Testing and optimization of a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing method is underway but has not yet been reliably established. Genetic editing using transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 components in protoplasts appears feasible, but progress is currently hindered by the low regeneration potential of protoplasts. Preliminary experiments suggest that genetic transformation via homologous recombination may be possible. Nevertheless, further experiments are needed to identify the optimal parameters required. Until now, no inducible promoter systems have been tested in the hornworts. Further progress should be made on the long-term storage of hornwort plants. While spores provide a potential agent for long-term storage, many hornwort species do not develop sporophytes under laboratory conditions. Therefore, conditions necessary for long term storage of gametophyte fragments must be established. It is also necessary to extend the available genomic and transcriptomic resources, and efforts in that direction are currently underway. Finally, functional annotation of the hornwort genes is still in its initial phase. Considerable efforts must be directed towards the functional characterization of genes. This could be partially achieved by applying forward genetic techniques involving mutagenesis. Classical genetic approaches using genetic mapping via crossing of genetically diverse individuals must be also established.
A. agrestis has already been adopted by several groups as an experimental system and appears in literature with increasing frequency. The development of additional tools, especially CRISPR/cas9 technology, will spark further interest in hornworts and will further facilitate research in comparative developmental studies across bryophytes and vascular plants to answer long-standing questions of plant evolution and plant biology in general.
Statements
Author contributions
EF, AOM, MW, AN, SWT, YY, SR, LW, KS and PS collaboratively wrote the manuscript. EF, PS and MW coordinated the writing and finalized the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
JSPS Bridge Fellowship (BR220302) to EF. This project was carried out as part of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) priority program 2237: “MAdLand—Molecular Adaptation to Land: plant evolution to change” (http://madland.science), through which PS received financial support (PSLJ1111/1). Additional funding was received from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant nos. 160004, 184826, and 212509 to PS); project funding through the University Research Priority Program “Evolution in Action” of the University of Zurich to PS and LW; a Georges and Antoine Claraz Foundation grant to AN, YY, SR, LW, MW, and PS; UZH Forschungskredit Candoc grant no. FK-19-089 and an SNSF Doc.Mobility Projekt grant no. P1ZHP3_200030 to MW, and FK-22-098 to SR. AOM was funded by the BBSRC/EPSRC OpenPlant Synthetic Biology Research Centre Grant BB/L014130/1. This work was also supported by a Foundation of German Business (SDW) Scholarship to AN. SWT is funded by the Doris Zimmern HKU-Cambridge Hughes Hall Scholarship. KS was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP22H05177.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dora Huszar (ISEB, University of Zurich, Switzerland) for her help with plant culturing, Celia Baroux and Christof Eichenberger (IPMB, University of Zurich, Switzerland) for their expertise in fluorescence microscopy and providing us with the necessary equipment.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
ÁlvarezC.NavarroJ. A.Molina-HerediaF. P.MariscalV. (2020). Endophytic colonization of rice (Oryza sativa l.) by the symbiotic strain Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.33, 1040–1045. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-20-0015-SC
2
AdamsD. G.DugganP. S. (2008). Cyanobacteria-bryophyte symbioses. J. Exp. Bot.59, 1047–1058. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern005
3
AdlerL.Díaz-RamosA.MaoY.PukaczK. R.FeiC.McCormickA. J. (2022). New horizons for building pyrenoid-based CO2-concentrating mechanisms in plants to improve yields. Plant Physiol.190, 1609–1627. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac373
4
AlfayateC.EstébanezB.RonE. (2000). The sporophyte-gametophyte junction in five species of pleurocarpous mosses. Bryologist103, 467–474. doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0467:TSGJIF]2.0.CO;2
5
AlthoffF.ZachgoS. (2020). Transformation of Riccia fluitans, an amphibious liverwort dynamically responding to environmental changes. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21(15), 5410. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155410
6
AlvarengaD. O.RouskK. (2022). Unraveling host-microbe interactions and ecosystem functions in moss-bacteria symbioses. J. Exp. Bot.73, 4473–4486. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac091
7
AndersenO. M.MarkhamK. R. (Eds.). (2005). Flavonoids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Applications (1st ed.). Boca Raton, CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781420039443
8
Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000). Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature408, 796–815. doi: 10.1038/35048692
9
ArchibaldJ. M. (2009). The puzzle of plastid evolution. Curr. Biol.19, R81–R88. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.067
10
AtkinsonN.LeitãoN.OrrD. J.MeyerM. T.Carmo-SilvaE.GriffithsH.et al. (2017). Rubisco small subunits from the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas complement rubisco-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis. New Phytol.214, 655–667. doi: 10.1111/nph.14414
11
AtkinsonN.MaoY.ChanK. X.McCormickA. J. (2020). Condensation of rubisco into a proto-pyrenoid in higher plant chloroplasts. Nat. Commun.11, 6303. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20132-0
12
BanksJ. A.NishiyamaT.HasebeM.BowmanJ. L.GribskovM.DePamphilisC.et al. (2011). The Selaginella genome identifies genetic changes associated with the evolution of vascular plants. Science332, 960–963. doi: 10.1126/science.1203810
13
Bar-EvenA.NoorE.SavirY.LiebermeisterW.DavidiD.TawfikD. S.et al. (2011). The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry50, 4402–4410. doi: 10.1021/bi2002289
14
BarrettJ.GirrP.MackinderL. C. M. (2021). Pyrenoids: CO2-fixing phase separated liquid organelles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res.1868, 118949. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118949
15
BartlettE. M. (1928). A comparative study of the development of the sporophyte in the anthocerotaceae, with especial reference to the genus Anthoceros. Ann. Bot.42, 409–430. doi: 10.1093/jxb/13.1.161
16
BeckerB.MarinB. (2009). Streptophyte algae and the origin of embryophytes. Ann. Bot.103, 999–1004. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp044
17
Bernath-LevinK.SchmidbergerJ.HonkanenS.GutmannB.SunY. K.PullakhandamA.et al. (2021). Cofactor-independent RNA editing by a synthetic s-type PPR protein. Synth. Biol. (Oxford England)7, ysab034. doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysab034
18
BirkyC. W. (1983). The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division. Int. Rev. Cytol. Suppl.15, 49–89. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-364376-6.50009-0
19
BirkyC. W. (2001). The inheritance of genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts: Laws, mechanisms, and models. Annu. Rev. Genet.35, 125–148. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090231
20
BirkyC. W.SkavarilR. V. (1984). Random partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division: the effect of organelle and cell volume. J. Theor. Biol.106, 441–447. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(84)90001-8
21
BockR.TimmisJ. N. (2008). Reconstructing evolution: Gene transfer from plastids to the nucleus. BioEssays30, 556–566. doi: 10.1002/bies.20761
22
BowerF. O. (1935). Primitive land plants: Also known as the archegoniatae (Macmillan, London).
23
BowmanJ. L.SmythD. R. (1999). CRABS CLAW, a gene that regulates carpel and nectary development in Arabidopsis, encodes a novel protein with zinc finger and helix-loop-helix domains. Development126, 2387–2396. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.11.2387
24
BowmanJ. L.Arteaga-VazquezM.BergerF.BriginshawL. N.CarellaP.Aguilar-CruzA.et al. (2022). The renaissance and enlightenment of Marchantia as a model system. Plant Cell34, 3512–3542. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac219
25
BowmanJ. L.KohchiT.YamatoK. T.JenkinsJ.ShuS.IshizakiK.et al. (2017). Insights into land plant evolution garnered from the Marchantia polymorpha genome. Cell171, 287–304.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.030
26
BowmanJ. L.SakakibaraK.FurumizuC.DierschkeT. (2016). Evolution in the cycles of life. Annu. Rev. Genet.50, 133–154. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035227
27
BrunkardJ. O.RunkelA. M.ZambryskiP. C. (2015). Chloroplasts extend stromules independently and in response to internal redox signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.112, 10044–10049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511570112
28
BuckW.GoffinetB. (2000). “Morphology and classification of mosses,” in Bryophyte biology. Eds. ShawA. J.GoffinetB. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 71–123.
29
BuckW. R.ShawA. J.GoffinetB. (2008). “Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the bryophyta,” in Bryophyte biology. Ed. ShawA. J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 55–138. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511754807.003
30
BuiL. T.CordleA. R.IrishE. E.ChengC.-L. (2015). Transient and stable transformation of Ceratopteris richardii gametophytes. BMC Res. Notes8, 214. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1193-x
31
BurrF. A. (1969). Reduction in chloroplast number during gametophyte regeneration in Megaceros flagellaris. Bryologist72, 200. doi: 10.2307/3241669
32
CammarataJ.Morales FarfanC.ScanlonM. J.RoederA. H. K. (2022). Cytokinin-CLAVATA cross-talk is an ancient mechanism regulating shoot meristem homeostasis in land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.119, e2116860119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116860119
33
CampbellE. L.MeeksJ. C. (1989). Characteristics of hormogonia formation by symbiotic Nostoc spp. in response to the presence of Anthoceros punctatus or its extracellular products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.55, 125–131. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.1.125-131.1989
34
CampbellE. L.CohenM. F.MeeksJ. C. (1997). A polyketide-synthase-like gene is involved in the synthesis of heterocyst glycolipids in Nostoc punctiforme strain ATCC 29133. Arch. Microbiol.167, 251–258. doi: 10.1007/s002030050440
35
CaplanJ. L.KumarA. S.ParkE.PadmanabhanM. S.HobanK.ModlaS.et al. (2015). Chloroplast stromules function during innate immunity. Dev. Cell34, 45–57. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.05.011
36
CarafaA.DuckettJ. G.LigroneR. (2003). The placenta in Monoclea forsteri hook. and Treubia lacunosa (Col.) prosk: insights into placental evolution in liverworts. Ann. Bot.92, 299–307. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg140
37
ChaterC.CaineR. S.FlemingA. J.GrayJ. E. (2017). Origins and evolution of stomatal development. Plant Physiol.174, 183. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00183
38
ChaterC. C.CaineR. S.TomekM.WallaceS.KamisugiY.CumingA. C.et al. (2016). Origin and function of stomata in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Nat. Plants2, 16179. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.179
39
ChaterC.KamisugiY.MovahediM.FlemingA.CumingA. C.GrayJ. E.et al. (2011). Regulatory mechanism controlling stomatal behavior conserved across 400 million years of land plant evolution. Curr. Biol.21, 1025–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.032
40
ChatterjeeP.SchafranP.LiF.-W.MeeksJ. C. (2022). Nostoc talks back: Temporal patterns of differential gene expression during establishment of anthoceros-nostoc symbiosis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.35, 917–932. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-05-22-0101-r
41
ChenC.MacCreadyJ. S.DucatD. C.OsteryoungK. W. (2018). The molecular machinery of chloroplast division. Plant Physiol.176, 138–151. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01272
42
ChenF.DongW.ZhangJ.GuoX.ChenJ.WangZ.et al. (2018). The sequenced angiosperm genomes and genome databases. Front. Plant Sci.9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00418
43
ChengS.XianW.FuY.MarinB.KellerJ.WuT.et al. (2019). Genomes of subaerial Zygnematophyceae provide insights into land plant evolution. Cell179, 1057–1067.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.019
44
ChoS.-h.ChungY.ChoS.-k.RimY.ShinJ. (1999). Particle bombardment mediated transformation and GFP expression in the moss Physcomitrella patens9, 14–19.
45
ClarkJ. W.HarrisB. J.HetheringtonA. J.Hurtado-CastanoN.BrenchR. A.CassonS.et al. (2022). The origin and evolution of stomata. Curr. Biol.32, R539–R553. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.040
46
ClarkS. E.WilliamsR. W.MeyerowitzE. M. (1997). The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell89, 575–585. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80239-1
47
Crandall-StotlerB.StotlerR. E. (2008). “Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta,” in Bryophyte biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 21–70. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139171304.003
48
DaniellH.LinC.-S.YuM.ChangW.-J. (2016). Chloroplast genomes: diversity, evolution, and applications in genetic engineering. Genome Biol.17, 134. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1004-2
49
DaviesK. M.JibranR.ZhouY.AlbertN. W.BrummellD. A.JordanB. R.et al. (2020). The evolution of flavonoid biosynthesis: A bryophyte perspective. Front. Plant Sci.11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00007
50
DelauxP.-M.SchornackS. (2021). Plant evolution driven by interactions with symbiotic and pathogenic microbes. Science371(6531), eaba6605. doi: 10.1126/science.aba6605
51
DesiroA.DuckettJ. G.PresselS.VillarrealJ. C.BidartondoM. I.DesiròA.et al. (2013). Fungal symbioses in hornworts: a chequered history. Proc. R. Soc B-Biological Sci.280, 20130207. doi: 10.1098/Rspb.2013.0207
52
de VriesJ.GouldS. B. (2018). The monoplastidic bottleneck in algae and plant evolution. J. Cell Sci.131, jcs203414. doi: 10.1242/jcs.203414
53
de VriesJ.StantonA.ArchibaldJ. M.GouldS. B. (2016). Streptophyte terrestrialization in light of plastid evolution. Trends Plant Sci.21, 467–476. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.021
54
de VriesS.de VriesJ. (2022). Evolutionary genomic insights into cyanobacterial symbioses in plants. Quant. Plant Biol.3, e16. doi: 10.1017/qpb.2022.3
55
DierschkeT.Flores-SandovalE.Rast-SomssichM. I.AlthoffF.ZachgoS.BowmanJ. L. (2021). Gamete expression of TALE class HD genes activates the diploid sporophyte program in Marchantia polymorpha. Elife10, 1–25. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57088
56
DiopS. I.SuboticO.Giraldo-FonsecaA.WallerM.KirbisA.NeubauerA.et al. (2020). A pseudomolecule-scale genome assembly of the liverwort marchantia polymorpha. Plant J.101, 1378–1396. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14602
57
DolanL. (2009). Body building on land - morphological evolution of land plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.12, 4–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.001
58
DonoghueP. C. J.HarrisonC. J.PapsJ.SchneiderH. (2021). The evolutionary emergence of land plants. Curr. Biol.31, R1281–R1298. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.038
59
DubrovskyJ. G.VissenbergK. (2021). The quiescent centre and root apical meristem: organization and function. J. Exp. Bot.72, 6673–6678. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab405
60
DuttaS.CruzJ. A.ImranS. M.ChenJ.KramerD. M.OsteryoungK. W. (2017). Variations in chloroplast movement and chlorophyll fluorescence among chloroplast division mutants under light stress. J. Exp. Bot.68, 3541–3555. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx203
61
EdwardsD.KerpH.HassH. (1998). Stomata in early land plants: An anatomical and ecophysiological approach. J. Exp. Bot.49, 255–278. doi: 10.1093/jxb/49.special_issue.255
62
EnderlinC. S.MeeksJ. C. (1983). Pure culture and reconstitution of the anthoceros-nostoc symbiotic association. Planta158, 157–165. doi: 10.1007/BF00397709
63
EngelB. D.SchafferM.CuellarL. K.VillaE.PlitzkoJ. M.BaumeisterW. (2015). Native architecture of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast revealed by in situ cryo-electron tomography. Elife2015, 1–29. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04889
64
EvkaikinaA. I.BerkeL.RomanovaM. A.Proux-WéraE.IvanovaA. N.RydinC.et al. (2017). The huperzia selago shoot tip transcriptome sheds new light on the evolution of leaves. Genome Biol. Evol.9, 2444–2460. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx169
65
FieldK. J.DuckettJ. G.CameronD. D.PresselS. (2015). Stomatal density and aperture in non-vascular land plants are non-responsive to above-ambient atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Ann. Bot.115, 915–922. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv021
66
FouracreJ. P.HarrisonC. J. (2022). How was apical growth regulated in the ancestral land plant? insights from the development of non-seed plants. Plant Physiol.190, 100–112. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac313
67
FrangedakisE.Guzman-ChavezF.RebmannM.MarkelK.YuY.PerrakiA.et al. (2021c). Construction of DNA Tools for Hyperexpression in Marchantia Chloroplasts Eftychios. ACS Synth. Biol.10(7), 1651–66. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00637
68
FrangedakisE.ShimamuraM.VillarrealJ. C.LiF.-W.TomaselliM.WallerM.et al. (2021a). The hornworts: morphology, evolution and development. New Phytol.229, 735–754. doi: 10.1111/nph.16874
69
FrangedakisE.WallerM.NishiyamaT.TsukayaH.XuX.YueY.et al. (2021b). An agrobacterium-mediated stable transformation technique for the hornwort model Anthoceros agrestis. New Phytol.232, 1488–1505. doi: 10.1111/nph.17524
70
GerkeP.SzövényiP.NeubauerA.LenzH.GutmannB.McDowellR.et al. (2020). Towards a plant model for enigmatic U-to-C RNA editing: the organelle genomes, transcriptomes, editomes and candidate RNA editing factors in the hornwort Anthoceros agrestis. New Phytol.225, 1974–1992. doi: 10.1111/nph.16297
71
GerrienneP.ServaisT.VecoliM. (2016). Plant evolution and terrestrialization during Palaeozoic times–the phylogenetic context. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.227, 4–18. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2016.01.004
72
GoldshmidtA.AlvarezJ. P.BowmanJ. L.EshedY. (2008). Signals derived from YABBY gene activities in organ primordia regulate growth and partitioning of Arabidopsis shoot apical meristems. Plant Cell20, 1217–1230. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.057877
73
GottJ. M.EmesonR. B. (2000). Functions and mechanisms of RNA editing. Annu. Rev. Genet.34, 499–531. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.499
74
GrayJ. C.SullivanJ. A.HibberdJ. M.HansenM. R. (2001). Stromules: Mobile protrusions and interconnections between plastids. Plant Biol.3, 223–233. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15204
75
GroscheC.RensingS. A. (2017). Three rings for the evolution of plastid shape: a tale of land plant FtsZ. Protoplasma254, 1879–1885. doi: 10.1007/s00709-017-1096-x
76
GunadiA.LiF.-W.Van EckJ. (2022). Accelerating gametophytic growth in the model hornwort Anthoceros agrestis. Appl. Plant Sci.10, e11460. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11460
77
GutmannB.RoyanS.Schallenberg-RüdingerM.LenzH.CastledenI. R.McDowellR.et al. (2020). The expansion and diversification of pentatricopeptide repeat RNA-editing factors in plants. Mol. Plant13, 215–230. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.002
78
Guyon-DebastA.AlboresiA.TerretZ.CharlotF.BerthierF.Vendrell-MirP.et al. (2021). A blueprint for gene function analysis through base editing in the model plant Physcomitrium (Physcomitrella) patens. New Phytol.230, 1258–1272. doi: 10.1111/nph.17171
79
HansonD.AndrewsT. J.BadgerM. R. (2002). Variability of the pyrenoid-based CO2 concentrating mechanism in hornworts (Anthocerotophyta). Funct. Plant Biol.29, 407–416. doi: 10.1071/PP01210
80
HarrisB. J.ClarkJ. W.SchrempfD.SzöllősiG. J.DonoghueP. C. J.HetheringtonA. M.et al. (2022). Divergent evolutionary trajectories of bryophytes and tracheophytes from a complex common ancestor of land plants. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1634–1643. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01885-x
81
HarrisB. J.HarrisonC. J.HetheringtonA. M.WilliamsT. A. (2020). Phylogenomic evidence for the monophyly of bryophytes and the reductive evolution of stomata. Curr. Biol.30, 2001–2012.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.048
82
HarrisonC. J.MorrisJ. L. (2018). The origin and early evolution of vascular plant shoots and leaves. Philos. Trans. R. Soc Lond. B. Biol. Sci.373, 20160496. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0496
83
HickokL. G.WarneT. R.SlocumM. K. (1987). Ceratopteris richardii: Applications for experimental plant biology. Am. J. Bot.74, 1304. doi: 10.2307/2444165
84
HirakawaY. (2022). Evolution of meristem zonation by CLE gene duplication in land plants. Nat. Plants8, 735–740. doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01199-7
85
HirakawaY.FujimotoT.IshidaS.UchidaN.SawaS.KiyosueT.et al. (2020). Induction of multichotomous branching by CLAVATA peptide in Marchantia polymorpha. Curr. Biol.30, 3833–3840.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.016
86
HolzingerA.KwokE. Y.HansonM. R. (2008). Effects of arc3, arc5 and arc6 mutations on plastid morphology and stromule formation in green and nongreen tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. Photochem. Photobiol.84, 1324–1335. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00437.x
87
HoystedG. A.KowalJ.JacobA.RimingtonW. R.DuckettJ. G.PresselS.et al. (2017). A mycorrhizal revolution. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.44, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.12.004
88
IshizakiK.ChiyodaS.YamatoK. T.KohchiT. (2008). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the haploid liverwort Marchantia polymorpha l., an emerging model for plant biology. Plant Cell Physiol.49, 1084–1091. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcn085
89
IshizakiK.Johzuka-HisatomiY.IshidaS.IidaS.KohchiT. (2013). Homologous recombination-mediated gene targeting in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha l. Sci. Rep.3, 1–6. doi: 10.1038/srep01532
90
Isidra-ArellanoM. C.DelauxP. M.Valdés-LópezO. (2021). The phosphate starvation response system: Its role in the regulation of plant–microbe interactions. Plant Cell Physiol.62, 392–400. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcab016
91
JarvisP.López-JuezE. (2013). Biogenesis and homeostasis of chloroplasts and other plastids. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.14, 787–802. doi: 10.1038/nrm3702
92
JeongS.TrotochaudA. E.ClarkS. E. (1999). The Arabidopsis CLAVATA2 gene encodes a receptor-like protein required for the stability of the CLAVATA1 receptor-like kinase. Plant Cell11, 1925–1934. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.10.1925
93
JohnsonG. P.RenzagliaÆ.K.S.LycophyteF.Á.SuspensorÁ.P.Á.TransferÁ. (2009). Evaluating the diversity of pteridophyte embryology in the light of recent phylogenetic analyses leads to new inferences on character evolution. Plant Syst. Evol.283, 149–164. doi: 10.1007/s00606-009-0222-4
94
Juan Carlos VillarrealA.TurmelM.Bourgouin-CoutureM.LarocheJ.AllenN. S.LiF. W.et al. (2018). Genome-wide organellar analyses from the hornwort Leiosporoceros dussii show low frequency of RNA editing. PloS One13, 1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200491
95
KammererW.CoveD. J. (1996). Genetic analysis of the effects of re-transformation of transgenic lines of the moss Physcomitrella patens. Mol. Gen. Genet.250, 380–382. doi: 10.1007/BF02174397
96
KarolK. G. (2001). The closest living relatives of land plants. Science. 294, 2351–2353. doi: 10.1126/science.1065156
97
KatoM.AkiyamaH. (2005). Interpolation hypothesis for origin of the vegetative sporophyte of land plants. Taxon54, 443–450. doi: 10.2307/25065371
98
KawaiH.KanegaeT.ChristensenS.KiyosueT.SatoY.ImaizumiT.et al. (2003). Responses of ferns to red light are mediated by an unconventional photoreceptor. Nature421, 287–290. doi: 10.1038/nature01310
99
KawamuraS.RomaniF.YaguraM.MochizukiT.SakamotoM.YamaokaS.et al. (2022). MarpolBase expression: A web-based, comprehensive platform for visualization and analysis of transcriptomes in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell Physiol. 1. 11, 1745–1755. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcac129
100
KeelingP. J. (2004). Diversity and evolutionary history of plastids and their hosts the tree of eukaryotes. Am. J. Bot.91, 1481–1493. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.10.1481
101
KnieN.GreweF.FischerS.KnoopV. (2016). Reverse U-to-C editing exceeds c-to-U RNA editing in some ferns - a monilophyte-wide comparison of chloroplast and mitochondrial RNA editing suggests independent evolution of the two processes in both organelles. BMC Evol. Biol.16, 134. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0707-z
102
KnoopV. (2022). C-to-U and U-to-C: RNA editing in plant organelles and beyond. J. Exp. Bot. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac488
103
KodamaK.RichM. K.YodaA.ShimazakiS.XieX.AkiyamaK.et al. (2022). An ancestral function of strigolactones as symbiotic rhizosphere signals. Nat. Commun.13, 3974. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31708-3
104
KönigerM.DelamaideJ. A.MarlowE. D.HarrisG. C. (2008). Arabidopsis thaliana leaves with altered chloroplast numbers and chloroplast movement exhibit impaired adjustments to both low and high light. J. Exp. Bot.59, 2285–2297. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern099
105
KubotaA.IshizakiK.HosakaM.KohchiT. (2013). Efficient agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha using regenerating thalli. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.77, 167–172. doi: 10.1271/bbb.120700
106
KugitaM.YamamotoY.FujikawaT.MatsumotoT.YoshinagaK. (2003). RNA Editing in hornwort chloroplasts makes more than half the genes functional. Nucleic Acids Res.31, 2417–2423. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg327
107
KumaranM. K.BowmanJ. L.SundaresanV. (2002). YABBY polarity genes mediate the repression of KNOX homeobox genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell14, 2761–2770. doi: 10.1105/tpc.004911
108
Leebens-MackJ. H.BarkerM. S.CarpenterE. J.DeyholosM. K.GitzendannerM. A.GrahamS. W.et al. (2019). One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants. Nature574, 679–685. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1693-2
109
LewisL. A.McCourtR. M. (2004). Green algae and the origin of land plants. Am. J. Bot.91, 1535–1556. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.10.1535
110
LiF.-W.MelkonianM.RothfelsC. J.VillarrealJ. C.StevensonD. W.GrahamS. W.et al. (2015). Phytochrome diversity in green plants and the origin of canonical plant phytochromes. Nat. Commun.6, 7852. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8852
111
LiF.-W.NishiyamaT.WallerM.FrangedakisE.KellerJ.LiZ.et al. (2020). Anthoceros genomes illuminate the origin of land plants and the unique biology of hornworts. Nat. Plants6, 259–272. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0618-2
112
LiF.-W.VillarrealJ. C.KellyS.RothfelsC. J.MelkonianM.FrangedakisE.et al. (2014). Horizontal transfer of an adaptive chimeric photoreceptor from bryophytes to ferns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.111, 6672–6677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319929111
113
LiF.-W.VillarrealJ. C.SzövényiP. (2017). Hornworts: An overlooked window into carbon-concentrating mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci.22, 275–277. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.02.002
114
LiL.YangJ.QiuH. L.LiuY. Y. (2010). Genetic transformation of Physcomitrella patens mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. African Journal of Biotechnology9, 3719–3725. doi: 10.5897/AJB2010.000-3237
115
LigroneR.DucketJ. G.RenzagliaK. S. (2000). Conducting tissues and phyletic relationships of bryophytes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc Lond. B. Biol. Sci.355, 795–813. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0616
116
LigroneR.DuckettJ. G.RenzagliaK. S. (2012a). The origin of the sporophyte shoot in land plants: a bryological perspective. Ann. Bot.110, 935–941. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs176
117
LigroneR.DuckettJ. G.RenzagliaK. S. (2012b). Major transitions in the evolution of early land plants: a bryological perspective. Ann. Bot.109, 851–871. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs017
118
LigroneR.FiorettoA. (1987). Chloroplast development in light-and dark-grown sporophytes of Phaeoceros laevis (L.) prosk. (Anthocerotophyta). New Phytol.105, 301–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00868.x
119
LindC.DreyerI.López-SanjurjoE. J.Von MeyerK.IshizakiK.KohchiT.et al. (2015). Stomatal guard cells co-opted an ancient ABA-dependent desiccation survival system to regulate stomatal closure. Curr. Biol.25, 928–935. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.067
120
LiuJ.LiS.WuC.ValdespinoI. A.HoJ.WuY.et al. (2020). Gigantic chloroplasts, including bizonoplasts, are common in shade-adapted species of the ancient vascular plant family {Selaginellaceae}. Am. J. Bot.107, 562–576. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1455
121
LiuH.WangX.WangG.CuiP.WuS.AiC.et al. (2021). The nearly complete genome of Ginkgo biloba illuminates gymnosperm evolution. Nat. Plants7, 748–756. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00933-x
122
LiuX.RouskK. (2022). The moss traits that rule cyanobacterial colonization. Ann. Bot.129, 147–160. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab127
123
Lopez-JuezE.PykeK. A. (2005). Plastids unleashed: their development and their integration in plant development. The International Journal of Developmental Biology49, 557–577. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.051997el
124
Lopez-ObandoM.LandbergK.SundbergE.ThelanderM. (2022). Dependence on clade II bHLH transcription factors for nursing of haploid products by tapetal-like cells is conserved between moss sporangia and angiosperm anthers. New Phytol.235, 718–731. doi: 10.1111/nph.17972
125
MackinderL. C. M.MeyerM. T.Mettler-altmannT.ChenV.MadelineC. (2016). A repeat protein links Rubisco to form the eukaryotic carbon concentrating organelle. Pnas. 113, 5958–5963. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522866113
126
MacLeodA. I.RavalP. K.StockhorstS.KnoppM. R.FrangedakisE.GouldS. B. (2022). Loss of plastid developmental genes coincides with a reversion to monoplastidy in hornworts. Front. Plant Sci.13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.863076
127
MaierR. M.ZeltzP.KösselH.BonnardG.GualbertoJ. M.GrienenbergerJ. M. (1996). RNA Editing in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. Plant Mol. Biol.32, 343–365. doi: 10.1007/BF00039390
128
MaizelA. (2005). The floral regulator LEAFY evolves by substitutions in the DNA binding domain. Science. 308, 260–263. doi: 10.1126/science.1108229
129
MallettD. R.ChangM.ChengX.BezanillaM. (2019). Efficient and modular CRISPR-Cas9 vector system for Physcomitrella patens. Plant Direct3, 1–15. doi: 10.1002/pld3.168
130
MarchantD. B.ChenG.CaiS.ChenF.SchafranP.JenkinsJ.et al. (2022). Dynamic genome evolution in a model fern. Nat. Plants8, 1038–1051. doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01226-7
131
MartinA.LangD.HankeS. T.MuellerS. J. X.SarnighausenE.Vervliet-ScheebaumM.et al. (2009). Targeted gene knockouts reveal overlapping functions of the five Physcomitrella patens FtsZ isoforms in chloroplast division, chloroplast shaping, cell patterning, plant development, and gravity sensing. Mol. Plant2, 1359–1372. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp076
132
McDowellR.SmallI.BondC. S. (2022). Synthetic PPR proteins as tools for sequence-specific targeting of RNA. Methods208, 19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.10.003
133
MeeksJ. C. (1998). Symbiosis between nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and plants. Bioscience48, 266–276. doi: 10.2307/1313353
134
MeeksJ. C. (2003). Symbiotic interactions between Nostoc punctiforme, a multicellular cyanobacterium, and the hornwort Anthoceros punctatus. Symbiosis35, 55–71.
135
MeeksJ. C.ElhaiJ. (2002). Regulation of cellular differentiation in filamentous cyanobacteria in free-living and plant-associated symbiotic growth states. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.66, 94–121. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.1.94-121.2002
136
MerchantS. S.ProchnikS. E.VallonO.HarrisE. H.KarpowiczS. J.WitmanG. B.et al. (2007). The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science318, 245–250. doi: 10.1126/science.1143609
137
MeyerM.SeibtU.GriffithsH. (2008). To concentrate or ventilate? carbon acquisition, isotope discrimination and physiological ecology of early land plant life forms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc Lond. B. Biol. Sci.363, 2767–2778. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0039
138
MeyerM. T.WhittakerC.GriffithsH. (2017). The algal pyrenoid: key unanswered questions. J. Exp. Bot.68, 3739–3749. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx178
139
MiyagishimaS.NakanishiH.KabeyaY. (2011). Structure, regulation, and evolution of the plastid division machinery. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol.291, 115–53. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386035-4.00004-5
140
MontgomeryS. A.TanizawaY.GalikB.WangN.ItoT.MochizukiT.et al. (2020). Chromatin organization in early land plants reveals an ancestral association between H3K27me3, transposons, and constitutive heterochromatin. Curr. Biol.30, 573–588.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.015
141
MüllerR.BleckmannA.SimonR. (2008). The receptor kinase CORYNE of Arabidopsis transmits the stem cell-limiting signal CLAVATA3 independently of CLAVATA1. Plant Cell20, 934–946. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.057547
142
MussgnugJ. H. (2015). Genetic tools and techniques for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.99, 5407–5418. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6698-7
143
NatesanS. K. A. (2005). Stromules: a characteristic cell-specific feature of plastid morphology. J. Exp. Bot.56, 787–797. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri088
144
NelsonJ. M.HauserD. A.LiF.-W. (2021). The diversity and community structure of symbiotic cyanobacteria in hornworts inferred from long-read amplicon sequencing. Am. J. Bot.108, 1731–1744. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1729
145
NeubauerA.RuaudS.WallerM.FrangedakisE.LiF.NötzoldS. I.et al. (2022). Step-by-step protocol for the isolation and transient transformation of hornwort protoplasts. Appl. Plant Sci.10, e11456. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11456
146
NishiyamaT.SakayamaH.de VriesJ.BuschmannH.Saint-MarcouxD.UllrichK. K.et al. (2018). The Chara genome: Secondary complexity and implications for plant terrestrialization. Cell. 174, 448–464.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.033
147
NystedtB.StreetN. R.WetterbomA.ZuccoloA.LinY. C.ScofieldD. G.et al. (2013). The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature497, 579–584. doi: 10.1038/nature12211
148
OgasawaraY.IshizakiK.KohchiT.KodamaY. (2013). Cold-induced organelle relocation in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha l. Plant Cell Environ.36, 1520–1528. doi: 10.1111/pce.12085
149
OnoK.IzumiY.TakamiyaM. (1992). Isolation, culture and thallus regeneration of protoplasts from the hornwort Anthoceros punctatus l. Cultured Cells Plant Tissue Cult. Lett.9, 27–31.
150
OsteryoungK. W.PykeK. A. (2014). Division and dynamic morphology of plastids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.65, 443–472. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035748
151
ParkY. I.ChowW. S.AndersonJ. M. (1996). Chloroplast movement in the shade plant Tradescantia albiflora helps protect photosystem II against light stress. Plant Physiol.111, 867–875. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.3.867
152
PlackettA. R. G.Di StilioV. S.LangdaleJ. A. (2015). Ferns: the missing link in shoot evolution and development. Front. Plant Sci.6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00972
153
PlackettA. R. G.HuangL.SandersH. L.LangdaleJ. A. (2014). High-efficiency stable transformation of the model fern species Ceratopteris richardii via microparticle bombardment. Plant Physiol.165, 3–14. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.231357
154
PresselS.GoralT.DuckettJ. G. (2014). Stomatal differentiation and abnormal stomata in hornworts. J. Bryol.36, 87–103. doi: 10.1179/1743282014y.0000000103
155
PuginierC.KellerJ.DelauxP.-M. (2022). Plant-microbe interactions that have impacted plant terrestrializations. Plant Physiol.190, 72–84. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac258
156
PuttickM. N.MorrisJ. L.WilliamsT. A.CoxC. J.EdwardsD.KenrickP.et al. (2018). The interrelationships of land plants and the nature of the ancestral embryophyte. Curr. Biol.28, 733–745.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.063
157
RadhakrishnanG. V.KellerJ.RichM. K.VerniéT.Mbadinga MbadingaD. L.VigneronN.et al. (2020). An ancestral signalling pathway is conserved in intracellular symbioses-forming plant lineages. Nat. Plants6, 280–289. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0613-7
158
RahmatpourN.HauserD. A.NelsonJ. M.ChenP. Y.Villarreal AJ. C.HoM.-Y.et al. (2021). A novel thylakoid-less isolate fills a billion-year gap in the evolution of cyanobacteria. Curr. Biol.31, 2857–2867.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.042
159
ReadD. J.DucketJ. G.FrancisR.LigronR.RussellA. (2000). Symbiotic fungal associations in “lower” land plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc Lond. B. Biol. Sci.355, 815–830; discussion 830-831. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0617
160
ReddyG. V.MeyerowitzE. M. (2005). Stem-cell homeostasis and growth dynamics can be uncoupled in the Arabidopsis shoot apex. Science310, 663–667. doi: 10.1126/science.1116261
161
RensingS. A. (2018). Great moments in evolution: the conquest of land by plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.42, 49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.02.006
162
RensingS. A. (2020). How plants conquered land. Cell181, 964–966. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.011
163
RensingS. A.GoffinetB.MeybergR.WuS. Z.BezanillaM. (2020). The moss Physcomitrium (Physcomitrella) patens: A model organism for non-seed plants. Plant Cell32, 1361–1376. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00828
164
RenzagliaK. S.BrownR. C.LemmonB. E.DuckettJ. G.LigroneR. (1994). Occurrence and phylogenetic significance of monoplastidic meiosis in liverworts. Can. J. Bot.72, 65–72. doi: 10.1139/b94-009
165
RenzagliaK. S.DuffR. J. T.NickrentD. L.GarbaryD. J. (2000). Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc Lond. B. Biol. Sci.355, 769–793. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0615
166
RenzagliaK. S.VillarrealJ. C.DuffJ. R. (2009). “New insights into morphology, anatomy and systematics of hornworts,” in Bryophyte biology. Eds. GoffinetB.ShawA. J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 139–172. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511754807.004
167
RenzagliaK. S.VillarrealJ. C.PiatkowskiB. T.LucasJ. R.MercedA. (2017). Hornwort stomata: Architecture and fate shared with 400 million year old fossil plants without leaves. Plant Physiol.174, 156. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00156
168
RichM. K.VigneronN.LiboureC.KellerJ.XueL.HajheidariM.et al. (2021). Lipid exchanges drove the evolution of mutualism during plant terrestrialization. Science. 372, 864–868. doi: 10.1126/science.abg0929
169
RigaultP.BoyleB.LepageP.CookeJ. E. K.BousquetJ.MacKayJ. J. (2011). A white spruce gene catalog for conifer genome analyses. Plant Physiol.157, 14–28. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.179663
170
RimingtonW. R.DuckettJ. G.FieldK. J.BidartondoM. I.PresselS. (2020). The distribution and evolution of fungal symbioses in ancient lineages of land plants. Mycorrhiza30, 23–49. doi: 10.1007/s00572-020-00938-y
171
RouskK. (2022). Biotic and abiotic controls of nitrogen fixation in cyanobacteria-moss associations. New Phytol.235, 1330–1335. doi: 10.1111/nph.18264
172
RoyanS.GutmannB.Colas des Francs-SmallC.HonkanenS.SchmidbergerJ.SoetA.et al. (2021). A synthetic RNA editing factor edits its target site in chloroplasts and bacteria. Commun. Biol.4, 545. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02062-9
173
SakakibaraK.NishiyamaT.DeguchiH.HasebeM. (2008). Class 1 KNOX genes are not involved in shoot development in the moss Physcomitrella patens but do function in sporophyte development. Evol. Dev.10, 555–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00271.x
174
SantiC.BoguszD.FrancheC. (2013). Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann. Bot.111, 743–767. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct048
175
Sauret-GüetoS.FrangedakisE.SilvestriL.RebmannM.TomaselliM.MarkelK.et al. (2020). Systematic tools for reprogramming plant gene expression in a simple model, Marchantia polymorpha. ACS Synth. Biol.9, 864–882. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00511
176
SchaeferD. G.ZrÿdJ. P. (1997). Efficient gene targeting in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant J.11, 1195–1206. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11061195.x
177
SchattatM. H.GriffithsS.MathurN.BartonK.WoznyM. R.DunnN.et al. (2012). Differential coloring reveals that plastids do not form networks for exchanging macromolecules. Plant Cell24, 1465–1477. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.095398
178
SchlegelJ.DenayG.WinkR.PintoK. G.StahlY.SchmidJ.et al. (2021). Control of Arabidopsis shoot stem cell homeostasis by two antagonistic CLE peptide signalling pathways. Elife10, 1–30. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70934
179
SchmitzA. J.GlynnJ. M.OlsonB. J. S. C.StokesK. D.OsteryoungK. W. (2009). Arabidopsis FtsZ2-1 and FtsZ2-2 are functionally redundant, but FtsZ-based plastid division is not essential for chloroplast partitioning or plant growth and development. Mol. Plant2, 1211–1222. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp077
180
SchüßlerA. (2000). Glomus claroideum forms an arbuscular mycorrhiza-like symbiosis with the hornwort Anthoceros punctatus. Mycorrhiza10, 15–21. doi: 10.1007/s005720050282
181
SchulerM. L.MantegazzaO.WeberA. P. M. (2016). Engineering C4 photosynthesis into C3 chassis in the synthetic biology age. Plant J.87, 51–65. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13155
182
ShawJ.RenzagliaK. (2004). Phylogeny and diversification of bryophytes. Am. J. Bot.91, 1557–1581. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.10.1557
183
ShimamuraM. (2016). Marchantia polymorpha: Taxonomy, phylogeny and morphology of a model system. Plant Cell Physiol.57, 230–256. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv192
184
SiegfriedK. R.EshedY.BaumS. F.OtsugaD.DrewsG. N.BowmanJ. L. (1999). Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development126, 4117–4128. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.18.4117
185
SmithG. M. (1955). Cryptogamic Botany. Vol. II. Bryophytes and Pteridophytes. AIBS Bull.5, 15–15. doi: 10.1093/aibsbulletin/5.2.15-a
186
SmithE.GriffithsH. (1996). A pyrenoid-based carbon-concentrating mechanism is present in terrestrial bryophytes of the class Anthocerotae. Planta200, 203–212. doi: 10.1007/BF00208310
187
SmithE. C.GriffithsH. (1996). The occurrence of the chloroplast pyrenoid is correlated with the activity of a CO2-concentrating mechanism and carbon isotope discrimination in lichens and bryophytes. Planta198, 6–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00197580
188
SmithE. C.GriffithsH. (2000). The role of carbonic anhydrase in photosynthesis and the activity of the carbon-concentrating-mechanism in bryophytes of the class Anthocerotae. New Phytol.145, 29–37. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00559.x
189
SolymosiK.LethinJ.AronssonH. (2018). “Diversity and plasticity of plastids in land plants,”. Ed. MaréchalE. In Plastids: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. (New York, NY: Springer US), 55–72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8654-5_4
190
StataM.SageT. L.HoffmannN.CovshoffS.Ka-Shu WongG.SageR. F. (2016). Mesophyll chloroplast investment in C3 , C4 and C2 species of the genus flaveria. Plant Cell Physiol.57, 904–918. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw015
191
SuD.YangL.ShiX.MaX.ZhouX.HedgesS. B.et al. (2021). Large-Scale phylogenomic analyses reveal the monophyly of bryophytes and neoproterozoic origin of land plants. Mol. Biol. Evol.38, 3332–3344. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab106
192
SuetsuguN.MittmannF.WagnerG.HughesJ.WadaM. (2005). A chimeric photoreceptor gene, NEOCHROME, has arisen twice during plant evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.102, 13705–13709. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504734102
193
SuganoS. S.NishihamaR.ShirakawaM.TakagiJ.MatsudaY.IshidaS.et al. (2018). Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing and its application to conditional genetic analysis in Marchantia polymorpha. PloS One13, e0205117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205117
194
SuganoS. S.ShirakawaM.TakagiJ.MatsudaY.ShimadaT.Hara-NishimuraI.et al. (2014). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha l. Plant Cell Physiol.55, 475–481. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu014
195
SzövényiP. (2016). “The genome of the model species Anthoceros agrestis,” in Advances in botanical research. Ed. RensingS. A. (London: Elsevier), 189–211. doi: 10.1016/bs.abr.2015.12.001
196
SzövényiP.FrangedakisE.RiccaM.QuandtD.WickeS.LangdaleJ. A. (2015). Establishment of Anthoceros agrestis as a model species for studying the biology of hornworts. BMC Plant Biol.15, 98. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0481-x
197
SzövényiP.GunadiA.LiF.-W. (2021). Charting the genomic landscape of seed-free plants. Nat. Plants7, 554–565. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00888-z
198
SzövényiP.WallerM.KirbisA. (2019). Evolution of the plant body plan. Curr. Topics Dev. Biol. 131, 1–34. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.11.005
199
TanahashiT.SumikawaN.KatoM.HasebeM. (2005). Diversification of gene function: homologs of the floral regulator FLO/LFY control the first zygotic cell division in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Development132, 1727–1736. doi: 10.1242/dev.01709
200
TanakaW.ToribaT.OhmoriY.YoshidaA.KawaiA.Mayama-TsuchidaT.et al. (2012). The YABBY gene TONGARI-BOUSHI1 is involved in lateral organ development and maintenance of meristem organization in the rice spikelet. Plant Cell24, 80–95. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.094797
201
TcherkezG. G. B.FarquharG. D.AndrewsT. J. (2006). Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 7246–7251. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600605103
202
UchidaN.ToriiK. U. (2019). Stem cells within the shoot apical meristem: identity, arrangement and communication. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.76, 1067–1080. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2980-z
203
VaughnK. C.CampbellE. O.HasegawaJ.OwenH. A.RenzagliaK. S. (1990). The pyrenoid is the site of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase accumulation in the hornwort (Bryophyta: Anthocerotae) chloroplast. Protoplasma156, 117–129. doi: 10.1007/BF01560650
204
VaughnK. C.LigroneR.OwenH. A.HasegawaJ.CampbellE. O.RenzagliaK. S.et al. (1992). The anthocerote chioroplast: a review. New Phytol.120, 169–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb05653.x
205
Villarreal AJ. C.RenzagliaK. S. (2006). Structure and development of nostoc strands in Leiosporoceros dussii (Anthocerotophyta): a novel symbiosis in land plants. Am. J. Bot.93, 693–705. doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.5.693
206
VillarrealJ. C.RennerS. S. (2012). Hornwort pyrenoids, carbon-concentrating structures, evolved and were lost at least five times during the last 100 million years. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.109, 18873–18878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213498109
207
VillarrealJ. C.RenzagliaK. S. (2015). The hornworts: important advancements in early land plant evolution. J. Bryol.37, 157–170. doi: 10.1179/1743282015Y.0000000016
208
WallerM.FrangedakisE.MarronA.Sauret-guetoS. (2022). An optimised transformation protocol for Anthoceros agrestis and three more hornwort species. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.08.10.503456
209
WardlawC. W. (1955). Embryogenesis in plants (San Diego: Methuen, the University of California).
210
WatersM. T.FrayR. G.PykeK. A. (2004). Stromule formation is dependent upon plastid size, plastid differentiation status and the density of plastids within the cell. Plant J.39, 655–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02164.x
211
WettsteinF. (1924). Morphologie und Physiologie des Formwechsels der Moose auf genetischler Grundlage. I. Zeitschrift für Indukt. Abstammungs-und Vererbungslehre33, 1–236.
212
WhitneyS. M.HoutzR. L.AlonsoH. (2011). Advancing our understanding and capacity to engineer nature’s CO2-sequestering enzyme, rubisco. Plant Physiol.155, 27–35. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.164814
213
ZhangM.SchmitzA. J.Kadirjan-KalbachD. K.TerbushA. D.OsteryoungK. W. (2013). Chloroplast division protein ARC3 regulates chloroplast FtsZ-ring assembly and positioning in Arabidopsis through interaction with FtsZ2. Plant Cell25, 1787–1802. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.111047
Summary
Keywords
terrestrialization of plants, land plants, polyplastidy, pyrenoid, RNA editing, evo-devo, plant-cyanobacteria symbiosis, plant-mycorrhizal symbiosis
Citation
Frangedakis E, Marron AO, Waller M, Neubauer A, Tse SW, Yue Y, Ruaud S, Waser L, Sakakibara K and Szövényi P (2023) What can hornworts teach us?. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1108027. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1108027
Received
25 November 2022
Accepted
13 February 2023
Published
08 March 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Verónica S. Di Stilio, University of Washington, United States
Reviewed by
Eduardo Flores-Sandoval, Monash University, Australia; Jeffrey Graham Duckett, Natural History Museum, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Frangedakis, Marron, Waller, Neubauer, Tse, Yue, Ruaud, Waser, Sakakibara and Szövényi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Eftychios Frangedakis, efragedakis@gmail.com; Péter Szövényi, Peter.szoevenyi@uzh.ch
This article was submitted to Plant Development and EvoDevo, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.