Ayyagari Ramlal
S. K. Lal
Vidyasagar Sathuvalli- 1School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Georgetown, Malaysia
- 2Division of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, India
- 3Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Hermiston, OR, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Advances in breeding for waterlogging tolerance in crops
Plants continuously face and are exposed to environmental stimuli and stressors such as light, temperature, water and nutrients. Plants are sessile and must develop strategies to overcome harsh climatic conditions and stresses. Stress restricts any organism from achieving its full growth and ability. Abiotic stresses including waterlogging, heat, drought, cold and salinity are some of the primary causes of global crop losses. Waterlogging leads to anoxia; soil saturation and hypoxia ultimately resulting in a reduction in production and yield (Ahmed et al., 2013; Fukao et al., 2019; Pan et al., 2021; Mareri et al., 2022; Parrotta et al., 2023). The majority of field crops are vulnerable to water stress at some point during their growth and development. Recent estimates indicate that about 12% of the planet’s arable land is frequently affected by waterlogging, leading to yield reductions of 20%. In the near future, this could increase as a result of climate change (Tian et al., 2021). Subsequent crop failures would become crucial factors threatening the food security of an increasing global population. For instance, soybean is highly prone to waterlogging during the germination, emergence and grain-filling stages (Ploschuk et al., 2022; Rajendran et al., 2022; Rajendran et al., 2023). Staple crops such as wheat, rice, barley, maize and others are highly susceptible to flooding (Tian et al., 2019; Panda and Barik, 2021; De Castro et al., 2022; Pais et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023). Necrosis, stunting, defoliation, poor yield, reduced nutrient availability, and plant death are common expressions of waterlogging (Hasanuzzaman et al., 2017). Identification of crop lines of staple crops susceptible or resistant to waterlogging is crucial for the development of tolerant lines through advanced breeding approaches, with marker-assisted selection and genomic selection for the development of resistant varieties (Devi et al., 2017). Extreme environmental fluctuations challenge desirable plant performance and yield responses. Plant interactions with environmental cues shape their growth and fate. There is an urgent need to develop strategies, methods and tools to identify broad-spectrum tolerance in plants that will support sustainable crop production under hostile environmental conditions. The mechanisms by which plants perceive environmental cues and relay those signals through their molecular networks to regulate their genetic machinery for growth and survival must be elucidated and deciphered.
A review of high-impact articles providing evidence and insights on plant responses to waterlogging stress will contribute to effective approaches to the development of climate-smart food crops and waterlogging-tolerant varieties to meet the food and feed requirements of future generations.
Taxodium ascendens Brongn. (synonym of Taxodium distichum var imbricatum (Nutt.) Croom. [Cupressaceae] is a tree species with high tolerance to flooding, that generates knee roots in wetlands. Qian et al. investigated the number and size of knee roots and subsurface roots, and their anatomical structures, physiology, and biochemical responses at various developmental stages under conditions of soil flooding. They delineated the adaptation mechanisms of T. ascendens to waterlogging stress and the formation of the knee roots. Their study revealed the mechanisms of knee root formation and provided scientific evidence for afforestation and T. ascendens management under waterlogged conditions.
Kitao et al. explored the successful natural regeneration of Betula platyphylla var. japonica (synonym of B. platyphylla subsp. mandshurica (Regel) Kitag.; Japanese white birch) [Betulaceae] and how soil water content modifies its competitiveness against perennial weeds. They took an ecophysiological approach with greenhouse and field experiments and a field survey to investigate the competitiveness of Eupatorium L. [Asteraceae] species. The authors concluded not always humid soils might be favourable to the rate of photosynthesis and permit Japanese white birch to compete favourably against Eupatorium species.
Waterlogging during the early stages of cotton (Gossypium L.) [Malvaceae] growth and development has adverse effects. The improvement of cotton for better yields and quality depends on the establishment of functional relationships between growth parameters and waterlogging duration. Beegum et al. have observed that the physiological and morphological parameters of cotton (height, stem diameter, number of main stem leaves, leaf area etc.) were inversely correlated with the number of days of waterlogging stress. Biochemical factors such as a decrease in macro- and micronutrient availability showed mixed trends as days of waterlogging stress increased. Therefore, this study can serve as a basis for developing cotton models to simulate the impact of waterlogging on cotton.
The development and adoption of anaerobic germination (AG) (or AG percentage; AGP) tolerant rice varieties Oryza sativa L.) [Poaceae] was described by Shanmugam et al. These AG varieties are important during this era of climate change. They explored the wider genetic variation for AG potential associated traits in a panel of 115 rice germplasms and identified Karuthakar (100), Poovan Samba (96.67), Mattaikar (96.67), Edakkal (96.67), Manvilayan (93.33), Mandamaranellu (93.33) and Varappu Kudainchan (93.33) as highly tolerant landraces. Their study also identified AG-tolerant landraces whose seeds are long and strong, with high shoot and root length as well as superior AG percentage and anaerobic vigour index when compared with other grain types.
Plants experience multiple stresses simultaneously, or multifactorial stress combinations (Zandalinas and Mittler, 2022). The work on the development of smart rice for drought-waterlogging stresses by Rahman and Zhang provides useful insights into the significance of multiple stresses on the growth, development, yield and production of rice and can be extrapolated to other crops as well.
From the contributions made to this topic, The key takeaways from a brief review of this topic elucidate waterlogging tolerance mechanisms including genetic, biochemical and physiological aspects of staple crops (rice), cash crops (cotton) and trees (pioneer tree and pod cypress). We hope that this useful knowledge will facilitate new and advanced studies and breeding strategies for crops of agricultural importance experiencing waterlogging. Combined efforts among theoretical research, varietal development and field-related studies are essential if we are to understand waterlogging tolerance in crops. We are grateful for the efforts of the journal editors, peer reviewers, and authors on this topic. This volume would not be possible without their significant contributions. We hope that our readers can identify valuable information from this volume and identify appropriate collaborators to advance work in this important area.
Author contributions
AR: Data curation, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SL: Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. VS: Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
We greatly appreciate the efforts of the journal editors and coordinators, peer reviewers, and authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ahmed, F., Rafii, M. Y., Ismail, M. R., Juraimi, A. S., Rahim, H. A., Asfaliza, R., et al. (2013). Waterlogging tolerance of crops: breeding, mechanism of tolerance, molecular approaches, and future prospects. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013, 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2013/963525
De Castro, J., Hill, R. D., Stasolla, C., Badea, A. (2022). Waterlogging stress physiology in barley. Agronomy 12 (4), 780. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12040780
Devi, E. L., Devi, C. P., Kumar, S., Sharma, S. K., Beemrote, A., Chongtham, S. K., et al. (2017). Marker assisted selection (MAS) towards generating stress tolerant crop plants. Plant Gene 11, 205–218. doi: 10.1016/j.plgene.2017.05.014
Fukao, T., Barrera-Figueroa, B. E., Juntawong, P., Peña-Castro, J. M. (2019). Submergence and waterlogging stress in plants: a review highlighting research opportunities and understudied aspects. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 340. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00340
Hasanuzzaman, M., Al Mahmud, J., Nahar, K., Anee, T. I., Inafuku, M., Oku, H., et al. (2017). “Responses, adaptation, and ROS metabolism in plants exposed to waterlogging stress,” in Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Systems in Plants: Role and Regulation under Abiotic Stress. Eds. Khan, M., Khan, N. (Singapore: Springer), 257–281.
Mareri, L., Parrotta, L., Cai, G. (2022). Environmental stress and plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (10), 5416. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105416
Pais, I. P., Moreira, R., Semedo, J. N., Ramalho, J. C., Lidon, F. C., Coutinho, J., et al. (2022). Wheat crop under waterlogging: potential soil and plant effects. Plants 12 (1), 149. doi: 10.3390/plants12010149
Pan, J., Sharif, R., Xu, X., Chen, X. (2021). Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in plants: Research progress and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 627331. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.627331
Panda, D., Barik, J. (2021). Flooding tolerance in rice: Focus on mechanisms and approaches. Rice Sci. 28 (1), 43–57. doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2020.11.006
Parrotta, L., Mareri, L., Cai, G. (2023). Environmental stress and plants 2.0. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (15), 12413 doi: 10.3390/ijms241512413
Ploschuk, R. A., Miralles, D. J., Striker, G. G. (2022). A quantitative review of soybean responses to waterlogging: agronomical, morpho-physiological and anatomical traits of tolerance. Plant Soil 475 (1-2), 237–252. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05364-x
Rajendran, A., Lal, S. K., Raju, D., Mallikarjun, B. P., Ramlal, A., Sharma, D. (2023). Waterlogging tolerance evaluation methods for soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) at the pregermination stage. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10722-023-01573-0
Rajendran, A., Lal, S. K., Raju, D., Ramlal, A. (2022). Associations of direct and indirect selection for pregermination anaerobic stress tolerance in soybean (Glycine max). Plant Breed. 141 (5), 634–643. doi: 10.1111/pbr.13048
Tian, L., Li, J., Bi, W., Zuo, S., Li, L., Li, W., et al. (2019). Effects of waterlogging stress at different growth stages on the photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 218, 250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.054
Tian, L. X., Zhang, Y. C., Chen, P. L., Zhang, F. F., Li, J., Yan, F., et al. (2021). How does the waterlogging regime affect crop yield? A global meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 634898. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.634898
Zandalinas, S. I., Mittler, R. (2022). Plant responses to multifactorial stress combination. New Phytol. 234 (4), 1161–1167. doi: 10.1111/nph.18087
Keywords: waterlogging, breeding, crops, environmental stress, tolerance
Citation: Ramlal A, Lal SK and Sathuvalli V (2023) Editorial: Advances in breeding for waterlogging tolerance in crops. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1284730. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1284730
Received: 29 August 2023; Accepted: 12 September 2023;
Published: 18 September 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Roger Deal, Emory University, United StatesCopyright © 2023 Ramlal, Lal and Sathuvalli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: S. K. Lal, sklal@iari.res.in; Vidyasagar Sathuvalli, Vidyasagar@oregonstate.edu
‡ORCID: Ayyagari Ramlal, orcid.org/0000-0002-1093-9877