Mistakenly, the trust scores were reported in Euros, whereas the SD and CI were reported in Eurocents.
Please find below a list of corrections made to this article:
– On page 2, right column, under RESULTS—TRUST GAME, the first sentence should read “The dependent measure was the trust score, computed as the amount of money transferred to the trustee (in Eurocents), for each experimental group (Lavender, Peppermint, Control).”
– On page 3, left column, 7th row, the text “M = 3.90” should read “M = 390.”
– On page 3, left column, 8th row, the text “M = 3.23” should read “M = 323.”
– On page 3, left column, 9th row, the text “M = 3.20” should read “M = 320.”
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
interpersonal trust, cognitive-control state, aromas, lavender, peppermint
Citation
Sellaro R, van Dijk WW, Paccani CR, Hommel B and Colzato LS (2015) Corrigendum: A question of scent: lavender aroma promotes interpersonal trust. Front. Psychol. 6:243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00243
Received
15 February 2015
Accepted
17 February 2015
Published
10 March 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited and reviewed by
Mariska Esther Kret, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
Copyright
© 2015 Sellaro, van Dijk, Paccani, Hommel and Colzato.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lorenza S. Colzato colzato@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.