CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 27 September 2016

Sec. Cultural Psychology

Volume 7 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01404

Corrigendum: The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study

  • 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, DC, USA

  • 2. Department of Psychology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland

  • 3. Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA

  • 4. Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw Wroclaw, Poland

  • 5. Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran

  • 6. Department of Psychology, College of Education, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • 7. School of Public Health, University of Ghana Legon, Ghana

  • 8. Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan Milan, Italy

  • 9. Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China

  • 10. Graduate Program in Morphological Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • 11. Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience Unit, D'Or Institute for Research and Education Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • 12. Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia

  • 13. Laboratory of Evolution of Human Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil

  • 14. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Languages History and Geography, Ankara University Ankara, Turkey

  • 15. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra Coimbra, Portugal

  • 16. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca Cluj-Napoca, Romania

  • 17. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • 18. Department of Psychology, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • 19. Department of Psychology, Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

  • 20. Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Izmir University of Economics Izmir, Turkey

  • 21. Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's University Halifax, NS, Canada

  • 22. Department of Psychology, Akdeniz University Antalya, Turkey

  • 23. Department of Anthropology, Cumhuriyet University Sivas, Turkey

  • 24. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland

  • 25. Department of Public Health, Medical School, Federal University of Uberlândia Uberlândia, Brazil

  • 26. Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb Zagreb, Croatia

  • 27. Department of Clinical Services, Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital Benin-City, Nigeria

  • 28. Department of Organization and Human Resources Management, Central University of Finance and Economics Beijing, China

  • 29. Department of Psychology, University of Nairobi Nairobi, Kenya

  • 30. Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC, Canada

  • 31. Department of Anatomy, Baskent University Ankara, Turkey

  • 32. Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada Granada, Spain

  • 33. Institute of Psychology, University of Pécs Pécs, Hungary

  • 34. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Razi University Kermanshah, Iran

  • 35. Institute of Psychology, University of Science and Culture Tehran, Iran

  • 36. Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • 37. Faculty of Computing and Management Science, Makerere University Business School Kampala, Uganda

  • 38. Department of Pure & Applied Psychology, Adekunle Ajasin University Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria

  • 39. School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia Sintok, Malaysia

  • 40. Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria

  • 41. Department of Anthropology, Istanbul University Istanbul, Turkey

  • 42. Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Madeira Funchal, Portugal

  • 43. Institute of Clinical Psychology, University of Karachi Karachi, Pakistan

  • 44. Department of Psychological Sciences, Constantine The Philosopher University in Nitra Nitra, Slovakia

  • 45. Department of Social Psychology, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • 46. Department of Psychology, South-West University “Neofit Rilski” Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

  • 47. Department of Psychology, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

  • 48. Faculty of Sports and Health Education, Indonesia University of Education Bandung, Indonesia

  • 49. Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia

  • 50. Institute of Psychology, University of the State of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • 51. Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore Bangalore, India

  • 52. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Guwahati, India

  • 53. Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University Ramat-Gan, Israel

  • 54. Department of Education for Students, Guangdong Construction Polytechnic Guangdong, China

  • 55. Department of Child & Family Studies, Kyung Hee University Seoul, South Korea

Due to an oversight, the name of the author “Ahmad M. Alghraibeh” was incorrectly spelled as “Ahmad M. Aghraibeh.” The correct version is shown above. The authors apologize for this oversight. This error does not affect the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

The original article has been updated.

Statements

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Summary

Keywords

dyadic coping, relationship satisfaction, culture, multilevel modeling, gender differences

Citation

Hilpert P, Randall AK, Sorokowski P, Atkins DC, Sorokowska A, Ahmadi K, Alghraibeh AM, Aryeetey R, Bertoni A, Bettache K, Błażejewska M, Bodenmann G, Borders J, Bortolini TS, Butovskaya M, Castro FN, Cetinkaya H, Cunha D, David OA, DeLongis A, Dileym FA, Domínguez Espinosa ADC, Donato S, Dronova D, Dural S, Fisher M, Frackowiak T, Gulbetekin E, Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya A, Hansen K, Hattori WT, Hromatko I, Iafrate R, James BO, Jiang F, Kimamo CO, King DB, Koç F, Laar A, Lopes FDA, Martinez R, Mesko N, Molodovskaya N, Moradi K, Motahari Z, Natividade JC, Ntayi J, Ojedokun O, Omar-Fauzee MSB, Onyishi IE, Özener B, Paluszak A, Portugal A, Relvas AP, Rizwan M, Salkičević S, Sarmány-Schuller I, Stamkou E, Stoyanova S, Šukolová D, Sutresna N, Tadinac M, Teras A, Tinoco Ponciano EL, Tripathi R, Tripathi N, Tripathi M, Vilchinsky N, Xu F, Yamamoto ME and Yoo G (2016) Corrigendum: The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study. Front. Psychol. 7:1404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01404

Received

26 August 2016

Accepted

01 September 2016

Published

27 September 2016

Volume

7 - 2016

Edited and reviewed by

Keiko Ishii, Kobe University, Japan

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Peter Hilpert

This article was submitted to Cultural Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics