In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. The “reward” box in the upper right-hand corner of Panel C erroneously displayed a “1” instead of a “0”. The word “reward” below the “t2” frame in Panel C should have read “no reward.”
Figure 2
Cue-activated reward anticipation and prediction errors and subsequent dopaminergic activity (adapted from Keiflin and Janak, 2015). (A) Before the cue is conditioned, the unexpected reward results in phasic activation of dopamine neurons and a positive reward prediction error. (B) Once a reward is conditioned, the cue (and not the reward) results in a positive reward anticipation and increased dopamine activity. (C) When the cue occurs but is met without the expected award, the result is a negative prediction error and a reduction of dopamine activity below baseline.
The corrected Figure 2 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
The original article has been updated.
Statements
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their thanks to Ana María Ruiz Ruano García and Jorge López Puga for pointing out the typo in Figure 2, and to Johann Pacheco-Veissière for reworking the figure.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
KeiflinR.JanakP. H. (2015). Dopamine prediction errors in reward learning and addiction: from theory to neural circuitry. Neuron88, 247–263. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.037
Summary
Keywords
smartphone addiction, social neuroscience, evolutionary anthropology, predictive-processing, cultural affordances, social rehearsal, hungry ghosts
Citation
Veissière SPL and Stendel M (2018) Corrigendum: Hypernatural Monitoring: A Social Rehearsal Account of Smartphone Addiction. Front. Psychol. 9:1118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01118
Received
08 June 2018
Accepted
11 June 2018
Published
03 July 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited and reviewed by
Maurizio Tirassa, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Veissière and Stendel.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Samuel P. L. Veissière samuel.veissiere@mcgill.ca
This article was submitted to Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.