AIM
The aim of this article is to investigate the potential impacts implication of caregivers as a resource in care management of patients at risk of suicide.
Suicide Prevention Challenges
Suicide prevention research faces specific challenges related to characteristics of suicide attempts and attempters (Wasserman, 2004). Suicide attempters have been described as poorly adhering to intensive treatment over time, and delivery of interventions in the emergency department can be difficult, where psychiatric staff availability is often limited or absent. The post-discharge period constitutes a critical challenge for emergency and mental health care services both in the short and long terms (Hunt et al., 2009). Given these issues, there has been growing interest in assessing the efficacy of post discharge intervention after a suicide attempt. For example, brief contact interventions (BCIs) are low resources interventions seeking to maintain long-term contact with patients after a suicide attempt (Milner et al., 2015). These interventions intent to reinforce the health care networking around the patient but only rely on mental health and emergency services. Depression, drug misuse, family and social situations are well established suicide risk factors (Zalsman et al., 2016). Recent findings also showed the correlation between sleep disturbances and suicidality from a clinical point of view (Pompili et al., 2013). Including protective factors in suicide risk management might be of great interest. However, prevention strategies often exclude form the preventative procedure an essential preventative component of patients social network: the caregiver (Mann et al., 2005). Indeed, studies showed the potential positive impacts of caregivers in the management of important suicide risk factors as depression (Joling et al., 2012), and social isolation (Chatterjee et al., 2014).
Involving the Caregivers in the Suicide Prevention Process
A caregiver, or carer, is an unpaid or paid member of a person's social network who helps them with activities of daily living. Caregiving is most commonly used to address impairments related to old age, disability, a disease, or a mental disorder (Berk et al., 2013).
Referred to as informal caregivers, caregivers provide a complex array of support tasks that extend across physical, psychological, spiritual, and emotional domains. Studies have shown that caregivers and close contacts are reliable sources of information about patients with psychiatric disorders. Caregivers do not exactly provide medical care, but can be considered as partners in the care as suggested by Fredman and Daly (Fredman and Daly, 1993). Traditional psychiatric assessment, however, does not always include information from caregivers due to time constraints, concerns about confidentiality and the risk of caregiver burden (Adelman et al., 2014). By excluding caregivers from assessments, clinicians may miss an opportunity to obtain additional valuable information about the illness course. Including caregivers in innovative prevention strategies could strongly improve the insight regarding patients' suicide risk situation.
Moreover, the involvement of the caregivers in a patient's assessment may facilitate the implementation of a step-by-step personalized prevention program during care transitions (e.g., hospital to home). This strategy may evolve into an all-embracing, tailored partnership involving healthcare professionals, patients, and their caregiver. Furthermore, the involvement of the caregivers means that they are able to play an important part in providing support and detecting warning signs when indicated. Caregivers are potential allies in the suicide prevention without, however, taking the place of healthcare professionals (Sun and Long, 2008).
Caregiver Involvement: Opportunities and Issues
Despite these promising opportunities, issues are raised regarding the assimilation of caregivers designated by patients at risk of suicide. Support for the patient on the part of his/her network in the vast majority of cases creates opportunities to relieve relatives of the strain of overwork. However, some studies have intended to involve the caregiver in a suicide prevention approach. For example, according to Sun et al., caregivers are able to play an important part in providing support and detecting warning signs and are potential allies in suicide prevention (Sun et al., 2009).
Family caregivers' suicide caring competence is important to prevent their relatives with suicidal tendencies from attempting suicide. Authors stated that clinicians and nurses are typically educated and trained to care for patients with suicidal tendencies, but family caregivers of suicidal individuals do not receive the same level of suicide care education. Family caregivers may lack competence to care for their relatives with suicidal ideations and/or behaviors. In this perspective, Sun et al. proposed an assessment of suicide caring competence which may help clinicians to assess the caring competence of family caregivers and provide proper suicide care education. In this perspective, caregiver could be involved systematically at the time of discharge of patients at suicide risk (Sun et al., 2014).
Caregivers and healthcare professionals should strive to create between themselves and with the suicidal patient a back-and-forth dynamic, wherein the risk of caregiver burden is a constant threat and urges caution on the part of all involved.
Tacitly taken for granted, the role of caregivers is at best reduced to that of auxiliaries, providing little more than emotional or material support to the patient, for whom they may as a last resort act as a spokesperson (Fredman and Daly, 1993). The patient will surely benefit from the implication of his/her caregiver in a preventative approach.
Toward the Involvement of Caregivers in Suicide Prevention Strategies?
Few studies have emphasized the family caregivers of suicidal individuals. No study has explored the relationship between family caregivers' caring stress with suicidal attitudes and suicide care ability. What does the caregiver paper adds to existing knowledge (Chiang et al., 2015)? Caregivers may be the primary interface with the health care system often receive inadequate support from health professionals and frequently feel abandoned and unrecognized by the health care system.
Mental health clinicians could help caregivers become aware of the emotional pain that suicidal people experience and then promote their positive attitudes toward their suicidal relatives. Caregivers could increase their ability to care for their suicidal relatives, which could reduce the numbers of suicides. Caregivers naturally play an essential role in supporting the well-being and care of patient at risk of suicide. Clinicians should identify their patients' caregivers, inquire about their caregiving experience, and benefit from a caregiver assessment. They should engage caregivers as proactive partners in care based on the involvement they can handle and the help they may need. We advocate that, as other preventative interventions, the efficacy of the involvement of caregivers in a suicide prevention strategy should be assessed in further researches.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Funding
This study was funded by the Fondation de l'avenir.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AdelmanR. D.TmanovaL. L.DelgadoD.DionS.LachsM. S. (2014). Caregiver Burden. JAMA311, 1052–1060. 10.1001/jama.2014.304
2
BerkL.BerkM.DoddS.KellyC.CvetkovskiS.JormA. F. (2013). Evaluation of the acceptability and usefulness of an information website for caregivers of people with bipolar disorder. BMC Med. BioMed. Central11:162. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-162
3
ChatterjeeS.NaikS.JohnS.DabholkarH.BalajiM.KoschorkeM.et al. (2014). Effectiveness of a community-based intervention for people with schizophrenia and their caregivers in India (COPSI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet383, 1385–1394. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62629-X
4
ChiangC.-Y.LuC.-Y.LinY.-H.LinH.-Y.SunF.-K. (2015). Caring stress, suicidal attitude and suicide care ability among family caregivers of suicidal individuals: a path analysis. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs.22, 792–800. 10.1111/jpm.12267
5
FredmanL.DalyM. P. (1993). Physicians and family caregivers: a model for partnership. JAMA270, 1426–1427. 10.1001/jama.1993.03510120048027
6
HuntI. M.KapurN.WebbR.RobinsonJ.BurnsJ.ShawJ.et al. (2009). Suicide in recently discharged psychiatric patients: a case-control study. Psychol. Med.39, 443–449. 10.1017/S0033291708003644
7
JolingK. J.van MarwijkH. W. J.SmitF.van der HorstH. E.ScheltensP.van de VenP. M.et al. (2012). Does a family meetings intervention prevent depression and anxiety in family caregivers of dementia patients? a randomized trial. PloS ONE7:e30936. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030936
8
MannJ. J.ApterA.BertoloteJ.BeautraisA.CurrierD.HaasA.et al. (2005). Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. JAMA294, 2064–2074. 10.1001/jama.294.16.2064
9
MilnerA. J.CarterG.PirkisJ.RobinsonJ.SpittalM. J. (2015). Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide. Br. J. Psychiatry206, 184–190. 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147819
10
PompiliM.InnamoratiM.ForteA.LongoL.MazzettaC.ErbutoD.et al. (2013). Insomnia as a predictor of high-lethality suicide attempts. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 67, 1311–1316. 10.1111/ijcp.12211
11
SunF.-K.ChiangC.-Y.ChenW.-J.WangR.-H.HuangH.-M.LinH.-Y. (2014). Development and psychometric testing of the Suicide Caring Competence Scale (SCCS) for family caregivers in Taiwan. Arch. Psychiat. Nurs.28, 284–289. 10.1016/j.apnu.2014.05.001
12
SunF.-K.LongA. (2008). A theory to guide families and carers of people who are at risk of suicide. J. Clin. Nurs. 17, 1939–1948. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02230.x
13
SunF.-K.LongA.HuangX.-Y.ChiangC.-Y. (2009). A grounded theory study of action/interaction strategies used when Taiwanese families provide care for formerly suicidal patients. Public Health Nurs. 26, 543–552. 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00813.x
14
WassermanD. (2004). Evaluating suicide prevention: various approaches needed. World Psychiatry3, 153–154.
15
ZalsmanG.HawtonK.WassermanD.van HeeringenK.ArensmanE.SarchiaponeM.et al. (2016). Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry3, 646–659. 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30030-X
Summary
Keywords
suicide, attempted-caregiver, designated-ethics-responsibility-vulnerability, prevention strategies, ethical issues
Citation
Le Moal V, Lemey C, Walter M and Berrouiguet S (2018) Viewpoint: Toward Involvement of Caregivers in Suicide Prevention Strategies; Ethical Issues and Perspectives. Front. Psychol. 9:2457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02457
Received
15 May 2018
Accepted
20 November 2018
Published
18 December 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Jorge Lopez-Castroman, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, France
Reviewed by
Gianluca Serafini, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze e Organi di Senso, Ospedale San Martino (IRCCS), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Le Moal, Lemey, Walter and Berrouiguet.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Valérie Le Moal valerie.lemoal@chu-brest.fr
This article was submitted to Clinical and Health Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.