In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. The values for the female dominance (index) and dominance ranking from high to low of adults for all group-year points in Mawana were incorrect, apart from in Baie Dankie 2013 where only the ranking of adults was incorrect and in Noha 2011 where all information was correct. The number of females was incorrect in Kubu 2017 and so was the proportion of males; in Noha 2012 the number of males was incorrect and therefore the proportion of males was incorrect. Data on Baie Dankie 2014 were added. Data on Noha 2015 are omitted. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1
| Reserve | Group | Year/ Period | Male# | Female # | Male Pro-portion | Female dominance | Ranking from high to low (*means the adjacent individuals have the same ADI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mawana | Ankhase | 2011 | 2 | 5 | 0.29 | 0 | M, M, F, F, F, F, F |
| Mawana | Ankhase | 2012 | 6 | 6 | 0.5 | 0.58 | M, F, F, M, F, F, M, M, F, F*, M*, M* |
| Mawana | Ankhase | 2013 | 4 | 9 | 0.31 | 0.51 | F, M, F, F, M*, F*, F, F, M, F, F, M, F |
| Mawana | Baie Dankie | 2011 | 4 | 8 | 0.33 | 0.25 | M, M, F, F, F, M, F, F, M, F*, F*, F* |
| Mawana | Baie Dankie | 2012 | 4 | 12 | 0.25 | 0.46 | F, M, F, M, F, F, F, F, F*, F*, F, M, F, M, F, F, |
| Mawana | Baie Dankie | 2013 | 4 | 11 | 0.27 | 0.43 | M, F, F, F, F*, M*, F*, F, F, M*, F*, M*, F, F*, F* |
| Mawana | Baie Dankie | 2014 | 8 | 7 | 0.53 | 0.42 | F, M, M, M*, M*, F, F, M*, F*, M, F, M*, F*, F*, M* |
| Mawana | Baie Dankie | 2015 | 6 | 11 | 0.35 | 0.38 | F, M, F, M*, M*, M, F, F, F, F, F*, F*, M, F, F*, F*, M* |
| Mawana | Baie Dankie | 2016 | 6 | 11 | 0.35 | 0.27 | M, M, M, F, F, F, M* F*, F*, F, F, M, M, F, F, F*, F* |
| Mawana | Baie Dankie | 2017 | 12 | 12 | 0.5 | 0.40 | F, F, M, M, M, M, F, M, M*, F*, M, M, F, F, M, F, F, M, F, M, F, F, F, M |
| Mawana | Kubu | 2017 | 1 | 5 | 0.17 | 0 | M, F, F, F, F, F |
| Mawana | Noha | 2011 | 1 | 9 | 0.1 | 0 | M,F, F, F, F, F, F, F, F, F |
| Mawana | Noha | 2012 | 5 | 10 | 0.33 | 0.52 | F, F, M, F, F, M, M, F, F, M, F, F, F, F, M |
| Mawana | Noha | 2013 | 5 | 11 | 0.31 | 0.45 | F, F, M, F, M, M, F*, F*, F, F, M, F, F, F, M, F |
| Mawana | Noha | 2014 | 7 | 11 | 0.39 | 0.27 | F*, M*, F, M, M, F*, M*, M*, F, F*, F*, M*, M+, F+, F, F*, F*, F* |
| Mawana | Noha | 2016 | 2 | 6 | 0.25 | 0.08 | M, F, M, F, F, F, F, F |
| Samara | PT | 1 | 10 | 9 | 0.53 | 0.28 | M, M, M, F, M, M, F, M, M, F, F, F, M, F, F, M, M, F, F |
| Samara | PT | 2 | 10 | 9 | 0.53 | 0.32 | M, M, F, M, M, F, F, M, M, M, F, M, F, F, F, M, M, F, F |
| Samara | PT | 3 | 7 | 12 | 0.37 | 0.44 | F, M, F, F, M, M, F, F, F, M, F, M, M, F, F, F, M, F, F |
| Samara | PT | 4 | 6 | 11 | 0.35 | 0.52 | F, F, F, F, M, F, M, F, M, M, M, F, M, F, F, F, F |
| Samara | PT | 5 | 6 | 10 | 0.38 | 0.47 | F, F, M, F, M, M, F, M, F, F, M, F, F, F, F, M |
| Samara | PT | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.29 | 0.18 | M, F, F, M, M, F, M, F, F, F, F, F, F, F |
| Samara | RBM | 1 | 13 | 12 | 0.52 | 0.26 | F, F, M, F, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, F, F, M, F, F, F, F, F, F, F |
| Samara | RBM | 2 | 19 | 13 | 0.59 | 0.26 | M, M, M, F, F, M, F, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, F, M, M, M, F, F, M, F, F, M, F, M, F, F, F, F |
| Samara | RBM | 3 | 15 | 13 | 0.54 | 0.53 | F, F, F, M, F, F, F, F, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, F, M, M, F, F, F, F, F |
| Samara | RBM | 4 | 19 | 13 | 0.59 | 0.68 | M, M, F, F, F, F, M, M, M, F, F, M, F, M, F, F, F, M, F, M, F, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, M, F, M, M |
| Samara | RBM | 5 | 16 | 13 | 0.55 | 0.51 | F, F, M, F, F, M, M, F, M, F, M, M, M, M, M, F, M, M, F, F, M, M, M, M, F, F, M, F, F |
| Samara | RBM | 6 | 13 | 13 | 0.5 | 0.5 | F, F, M, M, M, M, F, M, M, F, M, F, F, M, F, F, F, M, F, F, F, M, F, M, M, M |
| Samara | RST | 1 | 15 | 21 | 0.42 | 0.41 | F, F, M, M, F, F, M, F, F, M, M, F, M, M, M, M, M, M, F, F, F, F, M, F, F, F, F, F, M, F, F, F, M, F, M, F |
| Samara | RST | 2 | 12 | 15 | 0.44 | 0.47 | F, F, M, M, M, F, F, F, M, F, F, M, M, F, M, M, F, F, M, M, M, F, F, F, M, F, F |
| Samara | RST | 3 | 10 | 15 | 0.4 | 0.23 | F, M, M, F, M, M, F, M, F, M, M, F, M, F, M, F, M, F, F, F, F, F, F, F, F |
| Samara | RST | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.43 | 0.53 | M, M, F, F, M, F, F, F, F, F, F, F, M, F, M, M, M, F, M, M, F, M, F, F, M, M, F, M, F, F |
| Samara | RST | 5 | 13 | 16 | 0.45 | 0.45 | F, F, F, M, F, F, M, M, M, M, M, F, M, F, F, F, M, M, M, F, M, F, M, F, M, F, F, F, F |
| Samara | RST | 6 | 14 | 16 | 0.47 | 0.43 | F, M, M, F, F, F, M, F, M, F, M, M, F, M, M, M, F, F, M, M, F, F, M, M, F, M, F, F, F, F |
| Amboseli | 1530 | 2 | 3 | 0.4 | 0.17 | M, F, M, F, F | |
| Amboseli | P | 3 | 4 | 0.43 | 0.38 | M, F*, F*, M*, F, F*, M* |
Information on the reserve, the group-name, number of adults of each sex, male proportion, female dominance, and individual rankings of both sexes per group per year. * means the adjacent individuals have the same average dominance index, ADI.
Although there were six females resident in Kubu in 2017, one did not participate in any conflict was therefore excluded from further analysis.
These individuals had tied values for their dominance index (ADI) with one or more of the adjacent individuals also marked with a *.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Summary
Keywords
the winner-loser effect, dominance hierarchy, fierceness of aggression, female dominance over males, adult sex-ratio, vervet monkeys
Citation
Hemelrijk CK, Wubs M, Gort G, Botting J and van de Waal E (2020) Corrigendum: Dynamics of Intersexual Dominance and Adult Sex- Ratio in Wild Vervet Monkeys. Front. Psychol. 11:598699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598699
Received
25 August 2020
Accepted
18 September 2020
Published
28 October 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited and reviewed by
Sylvia Kaiser, University of Münster, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Hemelrijk, Wubs, Gort, Botting and van de Waal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Charlotte Korinna Hemelrijk c.k.hemelrijk@rug.nl
This article was submitted to Comparative Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
†These authors share last authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.