EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol., 09 June 2022

Sec. Performance Science

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923452

Editorial: Cognition and Music Performance

  • 1. Education Department, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain

  • 2. Sibelius Academy, Helsinki, Finland

  • 3. Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression Department, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

  • 4. Conservatorium of Music, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

Article metrics

View details

3,3k

Views

858

Downloads

Because it involves a host of different perceptions, concepts and practices that are linked to particular social considerations, research in music is multifaceted and varied (Cross, 2001). The understanding of music cognition requires the contributions of psychological, neuropsychological, social, cultural, and educational perspectives to provide a full approximation to the phenomenon.

Psychological and neuropsychological studies have reported valuable insights regarding both musical perception and music performance. The cognitive and emotional mechanisms underlying the perception of music and how pitch, time, meter, and harmony are processed are of particular concern to researchers (Justus and Bharucha, 2002), as are how music expectations are produced (Pearce and Wiggins, 2012), how musical imagery is related to music perception (Brodsky et al., 2008; Martin et al., 2018), or how performers can regulate their emotional and motivational processes when preparing for concerts (López-Íñiguez and McPherson, 2020, 2021).

Music performance research has reported on evidence related to motor (Meyer and Palmer, 2003), auditory (Zatorre et al., 2007), cognitive (Jaschke et al., 2018; Herrero and Carriedo, 2019, 2020), and expressive (Canazza et al., 2013) processes during the interpretation of rehearsed or unrehearsed repertoire. In addition, the skills of playing from memory, playing by ear, sight reading and improvising, together with performing rehearsed repertoire are considered the five basic types of solo and group performance (McPherson, 1995a,b).

Whereas music education studies have mainly focused on teaching methodologies (e.g., Pozo et al., 2022), or perceptions about learning (López-Íñiguez and Pozo, 2014; García-Gil et al., 2021), social and cultural research has provided an extension of music considerations by exploring the benefits of music therapy (Gómez-Romero et al., 2017; Shi and Zhang, 2020), analyzing different cross-cultural approximations to music (Cross, 2001), and suppo rting the role of music as a social activity in musicians (Volpe et al., 2016), across the general population (D'Ausilio et al., 2015).

As none of the above-mentioned perspectives work in isolation, the current Research Topic presents a broad approach to music research by encouraging additional novel and diverse contributions.

Thus, musical experiences are addressed from the point of view of performance analysis through physiological and psychological measures focused on whether internal and external parameters are related to performance efficiency. Bojner et al. explore togetherness performance in string quartet by analyzing individual and group “flow” experienced by the musicians. By combining heart rate variability (HRV) and qualitative data, the study shows an interplay of synchronized social interactions among players associated with a feeling of group state flow. Papageorgi explores music performance anxiety (MPA) of adolescent musician learners in order to analyze whether it is interpreted and responded in different situations. The results suggest the existence of three different profiles (low, moderately, and highly anxious students) which are discussed in order to its clinical and educational implications. On their behalf, Orejudo et al. also analyze students of different ages and how the role of social support regarding self-efficacy in learning and performance may be considered as a potential predictor of long-term careers in music. This study shows how as age of performers increases the external social agents related with self-efficacy perceptions is varying. A different approximation performance based on communication is provided by Li et al. who study timbrical expressions and perceptions from the perspective of performers and listeners. Specifically, this study reports whether the timbral intentions of pianists provide visual cues that influence the perceived timbre of listeners. Music performance is also the focus of Tomezzoli et al. who investigate how bow mechanical characteristics influence violinists' preferences. This study shows that both camber and mass impact not only on the appreciations of violinists but also on the evaluations of the experts. Finally, the review of Godøy focuses on the practical applications in performance, improvisation, and composition of the our understanding of generative processes in music through the analysis of the crucial role of the sound-motion objects.

This Research Topic also contributes to increase the evidences in the analysis of educational music performance across cultural contexts. Yaghmour et al. report relevant neuropsychological cues to understand improvisation in a cross-cultural context. Through the analysis of EEG correlates, this study provides the first observations of the tonal-spatial system charactaristic of Middle Eastern music. A different cultural context is explored by Casas-Mas et al.. The authors provide a qualitative-descriptive approach to Flamenco music through the analysis of discourse and practice of two flamenco guitarists in their natural contexts by pointing out the embodied mind as a result of instrumental learning.

Beyond cross-cultural approximations, different social implications of music cognition and performance are also explored in this Research Topic. Neuropsychological evidences using diffusion MRI are reported in the study of Mehrabinejad et al. which reveals that microstructures with functional connection with motor and somatosensory areas as well as language processing area have significant correlation with music engagement and training and that this associations differ by sex. Li et al. contributes to social implications of music performance though the consideration of music to improve the quality of life of people by presenting an extensive bibliographical review about the contributions of music therapy.

Taken together, the papers included in this collection provide a rich insight into current research interested in the relationship between music cognition and performance. Through the use of a wide range of perspectives and methodologies, the articles presented here delve into key issues that allow us to improve our understanding of said relationship as well as its educational and social implications.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the reviewers who contributed to this Research Topic. Particular thanks go to the Board of the Frontiers Publishing team, as well as to the staff of the Frontiers Publishing team, and in particular to Ms. Monika Minaroy for her continuous support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    BrodskyW.KesslerY.RubinsteinB. S.GinsborgJ.HenikA. (2008). The mental representation of music notation: notational audiation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 427. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.427

  • 2

    CanazzaS.De PoliG.RodaA.VidolinA. (2013). “Expressiveness in music performance: analysis, models, mapping, encoding”, in Structuring Music through Markup Language: Designs and Architectures. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. p. 156–186

  • 3

    CrossI. (2001). Music, cognition, culture, and evolution. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.930, 2842. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05723.x

  • 4

    D'AusilioA.NovembreG.FadigaL.KellerP. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 111114. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.005

  • 5

    García-GilD.CasanovaO.Zarza-AlzugarayF. J. (2021). Musical skills in the Spanish Grado university degree in early childhood education. How do Spanish university students view their preparation?Music Educ. Res.23, 7789. 10.1080/14613808.2020.1853084

  • 6

    Gómez-RomeroM.Jiménez-PalomaresM.Rodríguez-MansillaJ.Flores-NietoA.Garrido-ArdilaE. M.González-López-ArzaM. V. (2017). Benefits of music therapy on behaviour disorders in subjects diagnosed with dementia: a systematic review. Neurología (English Edition).32, 253263. 10.1016/j.nrleng.2014.11.003

  • 7

    HerreroL.CarriedoN. (2019). The contributions of updating in working memory sub-processes for sight-reading music beyond age and practice effects. Front. Psychol.10, 1080. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01080

  • 8

    HerreroL.CarriedoN. (2020). The role of cognitive flexibility and inhibition in complex dynamic tasks: the case of sight reading music. Current Psychology.10.1007/s12144-020-00983-y

  • 9

    JaschkeA. C.HoningH.ScherderE. J. (2018). Longitudinal analysis of music education on executive functions in primary school children. Front. Neurosci.12, 103. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00103

  • 10

    JustusT. C.BharuchaJ. J. (2002). “Music perception and cognition”, in Steven's Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Sensation and Perception, Pashler, H. and Yantis, S. (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons. p. 453–492. 10.1002/0471214426.pas0111

  • 11

    López-ÍñiguezG.McPhersonG. E. (2020). Applying self-regulated learning and self-determination theory to optimize the performance of a concert cellist. Front. Psychol.11, 385. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00385

  • 12

    López-ÍñiguezG.McPhersonG. E. (2021). Regulation of emotions to optimise classical music performance: a single-case quasi-experimental study of a cellist-researcher. Front. Psychol.12, 627601. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627601

  • 13

    López-ÍñiguezG.PozoJ. I. (2014). Like teacher, like student? Conceptions of children from traditional and constructive teachers regarding the teaching and learning of string instruments. Cogn. Instr.32, 219252. 10.1080/07370008.2014.918132

  • 14

    MartinS.MikuttaC.LeonardM. K.HungateD.KoelschS.ShammaS.et al. (2018). Neural encoding of auditory features during music perception and imagery. Cerebral Cort.28, 42224233. 10.1093/cercor/bhx277

  • 15

    McPhersonG. E. (1995a). The assessment of musical performance: Development and validation of five new measures. Psychol. Music. 23, 142161. 10.1177/0305735695232003

  • 16

    McPhersonG. E. (1995b). Redefining the teaching of musical performance. Int. J. Music. Educ. 6, 5664.

  • 17

    MeyerR. K.PalmerC. (2003). Temporal and motor transfer in music performance. Music Percept.21, 81104. 10.1525/mp.2003.21.1.81

  • 18

    PearceM. T.WigginsG. A. (2012). Auditory expectation: the information dynamics of music perception and cognition. Top Cogn Sci.4, 625652. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01214.x

  • 19

    PozoJ. I.Pérez-EcheverríaM. P.López-ÍñiguezG.TorradoJ. A. (2022). “Learning and teaching in the music studio”, in A student-centred approach. Landscapes: Arts, Aesthetics. Springer.10.1007/978-981-19-0634-3

  • 20

    ShiE. R.ZhangQ. (2020). A domain-general perspective on the role of the basal ganglia in language and music: benefits of music therapy for the treatment of aphasia. Brain Lang.206, 104811. 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104811

  • 21

    VolpeG.D'AusilioA.BadinoL.CamurriA.FadigaL. (2016). Measuring social interaction in music ensembles. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci.371, 20150377. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0377

  • 22

    ZatorreR. J.ChenJ. L.PenhuneV. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.8, 547558. 10.1038/nrn2152

Summary

Keywords

music research, cognition, education, perception, socio-cultural

Citation

Herrero L, López-Íñiguez G, Casanova O, Zarza-Azulgaray FJ and McPherson GE (2022) Editorial: Cognition and Music Performance. Front. Psychol. 13:923452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923452

Received

19 April 2022

Accepted

02 May 2022

Published

09 June 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited and reviewed by

Andrea Schiavio, University of Graz, Austria

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Laura Herrero

This article was submitted to Performance Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics