Abstract
Infertility is a prevalent worldwide health issue and is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global health problem. Considering the importance of the psychological dimensions of infertility, various measurement tools have been used to measure the variables involved in infertility, of which the most widely used are the following: the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL90), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form (STAI), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). Therefore, given the problems of infertile people in terms of psychological dimensions, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the psychological assessment score in infertility. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, we applied an online database with no time restriction. Data were gathered using a random-effect model to estimate the standard mean difference (SMD) for the evaluation of the strength of association analyses. Our data demonstrated a significant higher SCL90 score (CISCL90: 0.96, 0.34–1.57, heterogeneity: 94%, pheterogeneity < 0.001), and a non-significant higher DASS score (CIAnxiety: 0.82, -0.14 to 1.79; CIDepression: 0.8, -0.28 to 1.87; and CIStress: 0.82, -0.24 to 1.88). It is essential to seek for strategies to help infertile patients overcome their infertility-related psychological problems.
Introduction
Infertility is a widespread, serious health problem that is defined as a global public health problem by the World Health Organization (WHO) (Agarwal et al., 2015; Cong et al., 2016). Infertility is considered as the failed achievement of a viable pregnancy following 1 year of unprotected intercourse, and it is estimated that more than 186 million people suffer from it worldwide (Inhorn and Patrizio, 2015). This period for women over 35 years of age, however, has been considered 6 months (Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2013). The overall estimated burden of subfertility/infertility is announced to be high. Based on the WHO reports, infertility affects over 10% of women (Boivin et al., 2011; Kalkhoran et al., 2011; Direkvand Moghaddam et al., 2016; Sarkar and Gupta, 2016) and 7% of men (Krausz and Riera-Escamilla, 2018). Indeed, the prevalence of secondary infertility is reported to be about 4.9% (Akhondi et al., 2019).
The reasons for infertility might be categorized into four major groups: (1) male factors, (2) female factors, (3) both male and female factors, and (4) unknown etiology (Speroff and Fritz, 2005; Blundell, 2007; Krausz, 2011). Currently, three major therapeutic strategies, such as surgical therapy (especially endoscopic techniques), pharmacological therapy, and assisted reproductive technology (ART), are available to treat male infertility. ART encompasses all interventional measures, including in vitro handling of both human sperm and oocytes and of embryos for reproduction issues. ART includes in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer, gamete and embryo cryopreservation, embryo biopsy, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and preimplantation genetic testing (Dyer et al., 2016).
Infertility affects different life aspects, such as social, mental, and physical ones (Tanha et al., 2014). It also can lead to the development of stigma, shame, depression, anxiety, guilt (Figure 1), and low self-esteem (2019). It is one of the personal and social issues affecting the whole couple’s life and family function, leading to the development of psychological stress and or psychiatric disorders (Boivin, 2003). Infertility can also be considered as one of the most stressful life events. Infertility is believed to be associated with health issues, feeling of grievance, stressful experiences, depression, lack of self-confidence, disappointment, threat, sin, and marital problems (Noorbala et al., 2008). Infertility can generate stress in the family (Dyer et al., 2005; Ozkan and Baysal, 2006; Sadeghian et al., 2006; Peyvandi et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2017). It is speculated that psychological factors rather than biological ones might be the primary cause of infertility. This can be an important field of interest for psychologists (Podolska, 2011).
FIGURE 1
Infertility is a real challenge as a couple disorder and sexual dysfunction is an emerging paradigm. A couple-centered approach for the treatment for infertility is mandatory requiring a multidisciplinary team for the comprehensive management of ISS including the whole sexual, rational, and emotional aspects of infertile couples. ART assisted reproductive technology, ED erectile dysfunction, HSDD hypoactive sexual desire disorder, and ISS Inferto-Sex Syndrome. This figure is adapted from Luca et al. (2021).
Due to the importance of the psychological dimension of infertility, various psychological treatments for infertility have been used so far (Domar et al., 1992; McQueeney et al., 1997; Hosaka et al., 2002; McNaughton-Cassill et al., 2002; Cousineau et al., 2008; Faramarzi et al., 2008; Lancastle and Boivin, 2008; Panagopoulou et al., 2009; Hämmerli et al., 2010; Hughes and da Silva, 2011; Vizheh et al., 2013; Frederiksen et al., 2015). Due to the importance of the psychological dimensions of infertility, various measurement tools have been used to assess the variables involved in infertility. The most widely used factors are the following: the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL90) (Derogatis et al., 1977), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) (Derogatis and Spencer, 1993), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) (Parkitny and McAuley, 2010a), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form (STAI) (Spielberger, 1983).
Given the importance of psychological issues and problems in the quality of life and the quality of physical therapy for infertile people, paying attention to the psychological dimensions of this problem is strongly required. On the other hand, due to the wide spectrum of mental problems, and in other words, the subjectivity of psychological problems, it is necessary to be able to measure the severity of psychological problems with small tools and break them down into smaller components so that we can study them in the form of scientific problems. One of the important tools to achieve this goal is the use of self-reported psychometric tools, which, despite the problems that this type of measurement has, can partially explain the total dimensions of the problem. Despite the number of studies investigating the association between psychological assessment scores and infertility, there are still some contradictory results. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the association between the psychological assessment score and infertility patients through a meta-analysis approach.
Materials and methods
Search strategy
This study has been done according to the PRISMA protocol (Moher et al., 2009). A systematic search was performed by two independent researchers (SAT and AHM) from the online database to find relevant publications until September 2021. The keywords used in our search strategy were ((”Infertility”) AND (”Psychological assessment” OR “Symptom Checklist-90” OR “SCL90” OR “Brief Symptom Inventory” OR “BSI” OR “Depression Anxiety Stress Scale” OR “DASS” OR “State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form” OR “STAI”)). No restrictions were considered for the time and language of publications.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria include cases defined according to infertility diagnosis; all studies evaluating the SCL90, BSI, DASS, and STAI scores of patients with infertility; studies that reported the SCL90, BSI, DASS, and STAI scores at baseline through clinical trials on infertile patients vs. healthy controls; and those that reported mean ± standard deviation (SD). In the case of the same dataset with more than one publication, only articles with more complete findings were included in our study. On the other hand, comments, short letters, clinical trials without a healthy control group, communications, reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, and animal studies were excluded from the meta-analysis.
Data extraction
Two independent researchers performed data extraction and study selection. The reported mean ± SD for the SCL90, BSI, DASS, and STAI scores were extracted from patients compared with the control group. In addition, we extracted the information from each study (Tables 1–5).
TABLE 1
| Type of research | Infertility type | Infertility treatment | Number of samples | Population | Outcome | References |
| Descriptive | Female | IVF | 43 | Spain | Significant differences were observed between both groups regarding depression | Santa-Cruz et al. (2020) |
| Descriptive | Female | IVF | 355 | Iran | A significant difference in location was observed between two groups. Mental health issues remained stable even after one year since abortion in the RSA group. | Adib-Rad et al. (2019) |
| Descriptive | Female and male | IVF | 256 | Iran | Prevalence of depression, paranoia, anxiety and hypochondriasis were significantly higher in infertile females and spouses of infertile males than husbands of infertile females. | Karimzadeh et al. (2017) |
| Cross-sectional comparative study | Female and male | No treatment | 120 | India | For the variable impact of event, somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, anger hostility, paranoid ideation, global severity, irrational belief significant difference was found between the genders | De et al. (2017) |
| Cross sectional | Female | IVF | 470 | Swedish | Women with previous history of IVF treatment were at increased risk of symptoms of depression, somatization and obsessive-compulsion compared to a reference group. | Vikström et al. (2015) |
| Descriptive | Female | IVF | 247 | Palestine | Statistically significant differences between fertilized wives and infertile wives in the psychopathological symptoms in favor of infertile wives. | Hamdouna (2014) |
| Not mentioned | Female | Not mentioned | 150 | Iran | Results demonstrated that 28.7% (43 women) of fertile and 44% (66 women) of infertile group had psychological disorders, thus significantly higher prevalence of psychological disorders was observed among infertile vs. fertile women. | Abedinia et al. (2013) |
| Descriptive | Female | IVF | 100 | China | Worse mental status of infertile women under treatment with IVF-ET was observed compared to fertile women. | Chen et al. (2008) |
| Descriptive | Female | IVF | 300 | China | Significantly higher scores on all subscales of the SCL-90 was observed in infertile Chinese women who planned to undergo IVF-ICSI. | Wang et al. (2007) |
| Descriptive- analytic study | Female | Not mentioned | 300 | Iran | The highest mean scores were observed for depression, paranoid ideation, and interpersonal sensitivity scales and the lowest scores were attributed to psychoticism and phobic anxiety scales among infertile women. Interpersonal sensitivity, phobic anxiety, depression, paranoid ideas and psychoticism scales were significantly different between fertile and infertile women. | Noorbala et al. (2007) |
| Descriptive | Female | Not mentioned | 120 | South Africa | Significantly higher scores on all sub-scales and global distress indices of the SCL-90-R vs. controls. | Dyer et al. (2005) |
SCL90 assessment studies in infertility.
TABLE 2
| Type of research | Infertility type | Infertility treatment | Number of samples | Population | Outcome | References |
| Retrospective, descriptive and causal study | Female and men | IVF | 278 | Portugal | Somatization, depression, anxiety, phobic anxiety, as well as Global severity index (GSI), total of positive symptoms (TPS) and positive symptoms index (PSI) are always significantly higher for women | Pereira et al. (2020) |
| Prospective, study with consecutive | Female | cIVF or NC-IVF | 119 | Switzerland | Baseline significantly more overall psychological distress BSI GSI and signs of obsession. Infertile women undergoing c IVF treatment displayed a significantly higher level of depression after the treatment in comparison with the NC-IVF patients | Haemmerli Keller et al. (2018) |
| Descriptive | Female | IVF | 203 | Germany | Infertile women and men with reduced levels of depression presented stronger intentions to continue. The anxiety and the somatization didn’t evidence any significant impact in couples’ intention to persist in treatments. | Marques et al. (2017) |
| Correlational methodology | Female | IVF/ICSI | 79 | Iran | the variables of stress, depression, overall severity index, positive symptom distress index, interpersonal sensitivity, and obsessive-compulsive disorder predict this likelihood that the IVF / ICSI treatments will be successful | Aslzaker et al. (2016) |
| Exploratory study | Female and men | ART | 433 | Portugal | Presents direct and indirect associations found between PCC and at least one measure of wellbeing presents direct, indirect and total effects of PCC on depression. Direct effects were found for communication, respect for patients’ values. | Gameiro et al. (2013) |
| Exploratory study | Female and men | IVF | 383 | Portugal | Anxiety and depression, as measured with the screen IVF, were more strongly related with the BSI subscales of anxiety and depression. | Lopes (2012) |
| Prospective, longitudinal design | Female | IVF | 121 | Israel | Pregnant women did not differ from non-pregnant women in any of the psychological symptoms measured at ovulation induction | Zaig et al. (2012) |
| Exploratory study | Female | IVF | 208 | Belgium | There were no clinically significant differences with the published norms | Van den Broeck et al. (2010) |
BSI assessment studies in infertility.
TABLE 3
| Type of research | Infertility type | Infertility treatment | Number of samples | Population | Outcome | References |
| Therapy | Female | IVF | 60 | Iran | Mean score of The post-intervention of depression and stress was significantly lower in the intervention vs. control group. | Rahimi et al. (2021) |
| Therapy | Female | IVF | 144 | Greece | The difference of stress levels between the two groups for each scale as well as in total was also significant | Koumparou et al. (2021) |
| Cross-sectional study | Female | polycystic ovary syndrome | 120 | Iran | Stress, depression, and anxiety total scores a significant negative correlation was found between each dimension of DASS scale. | Naz et al. (2020) |
| Case control study | Female | 200 | Pakistan | Depression, stress and anxiety were highly prevalent among infertile females vs. control group. | Yusuf (2016) | |
| Correlational methodology | Female | IVF/ICSI | 79 | Iran | Predictors of anxiety, depression, and stress, quality of life, brief symptom, infertility stress and infertilityhe, all of them can explain 25% of the variance of the dependent variable – ICSI / IVF treatment success. | Aslzaker et al. (2016) |
| Prospective cohort study | Female | IUI/IVF | 206 | Korea | There was a significantly higher scores of anxiety, depression and stress among infertile vs. fertile women. | Chi et al. (2016) |
| Cross-sectional study | Female | Polycystic ovary syndrome | 16 | Malaysia | Patients with symptoms of anxiety and depression were more likely to suffer from sexual dysfunction than other. Higher orgasm dysfunction was also observed in cases with stress symptoms than other. | Dashti et al. (2016) |
| Psycho-education | Female | IVF | 64 | Macedonia | Psycho-education resulted in getting lower anxiety and stress scores, while depression scales did not show differences between groups. | Belevska (2015) |
| Pilot study | Female and men | IVF/ICSI | 246 | Malaysia | Depression, stress and anxiety-related difficulties were significantly higher in wives than their husbands | Musa et al. (2014) |
DASS assessment studies in infertility.
TABLE 4
| Type of research | Infertility type | Infertility treatment | Number of samples | Population | Outcome | References |
| Descriptive, correlational study | Female | No treatment | 240 | Romania | Higher scores on the anxiety obtained at the women who were beginning of treatment. | Iordãchescu et al. (2021) |
| Prospective cohort study | Female | IVF | 304 | Kazakhstan | Anxiety scores were significantly lower among pregnant women than not pregnant women. | Aimagambetova et al. (2020) |
| Cross-sectional study | Female | IVF | 161 | Spain | Higher anxiety-state were observed but, no significant differences in depression scores were found among both groups. | Lasheras et al. (2020) |
| Pilot study | Female | IVF | 44 | United States | At all three time points, mean STAI State scores were significantly elevated. | Turner et al. (2013) |
| Prospective study. | Female | IVF | 24 | Brazil | No significant differences among the average values obtained during these 4 phases of major anxiety in women treated with IVF. | Seibel et al. (2003) |
STAI-S assessment studies in infertility.
TABLE 5
| Country | Case | Control | Treatment | Sample size (Ca/Co) | Study design | Age | Gender | Match | Quality assessment | Result | References | |||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Ca | Co | |||||||||
| Iran | 11.67 | 16.9 | 10.63 | 9.63 | IVF | (128/128) | Descriptive analytical | NT | NT | F and M | NT | 4 | ↑ | Karimzadeh et al. (2017) |
| India | 1.53 | 0.29 | 1.02 | 0.02 | IVF | (20/30) | Cross-sectional comparative study | NT | NT | F and M | F and M factor | 5 | ↑ | De et al. (2017) |
| China | 53.16 | 4.14 | 42.1 | 32.3 | IVF | (285/98) | Descriptive | NT | NT | F | Infertility type | 4 | ↑ | Wang et al. (2007) |
| South Africa | 65.9 | 6 | 59.3 | 9.5 | NT | (120/120) | Descriptive | 29.2 | 28 | F | Levels of care | 5 | ↑ | Dyer et al. (2005) |
| Iran | NA | NA | NA | NA | IVF | (26/26) | Randomized controlled trial | 34.4 ± 6 | 32.9 ± 7.4 | F | NT | 4 (J) | ↓ | Rahimi et al. (2021) |
| Pakistan | NA | NA | NA | NA | IVF | (100/100) | Case control study | NT | NT | F | NT | 5 | ↑ | Yusuf (2016) |
| Korea | NA | NA | NA | NA | IVF | (141/65) | Prospective cohort study | 34.3 ± 3.7 | 35.4 ± 4.6 | F | Age | 6 | ↑ | Chi et al. (2016) |
| Kazakhstan | 49.9 | 7.2 | 45.1 | 9.9 | IVF | (48/181) | Prospective cohort study | 34.8 ± 5.6 | 33.8 ± 6.2 | F | NT | 5 | ↑ | Aimagambetova et al. (2020) |
| Israel | 5.4 | 2.32 | 4.99 | 2.23 | IVF | (21/87) | Prospective-longitudinal | 32.71 ± 5.1 | 31.51 ± 5.5 | F | NT | 5 | = | Zaig et al. (2012) |
General characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis.
Ca, case; Co, control; F, female; M, male; NT, not mention; NA, not applicable; J-JADAD checklist.
Quality assessment
A form of the Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) was designed for observational studies and was used to assess the quality of selected studies. The NOS considers a maximum of ten points for each study. The studies that had an NOS score of 5 or more were considered high quality publications (Peterson et al., 2011). We used the JADAD checklist for evaluation of the quality of interventional studies (Jadad et al., 1996). Two independent reviewers filled out the scores for each eligible study.
Statistical analysis
For both the infertility and control groups, the SCL90, BSI, DASS, and STAI scores were reported using mean ± SD and 95% confidence interval (CI). The overall mean ± SD data were calculated using a random-effect model and/or a fixed-effect model. The SMD and CI were considered the overall if there was true heterogeneity between included studies, we employed a random-effect model; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used. To assess between-study heterogeneity, Cochran’s Q-test and I2 were used. A random-effect model was used if pheterogeneity was less than 0.1 (Higgins et al., 2011). Statistical analyses were carried out using review manager software (STATA version 14, StataCorp).
Result
We identified 32 studies in our systematic review. The last remaining nine articles were included in the meta-analysis, and the characteristics of these studies are illustrated in Figure 2. The results of the overall and stratified analyses are summarized in Figure 3. Regarding SCL90 and DASS, there was a statistically significant association between higher SCL90 scores and infertility. However, there was no significant difference between the case and control groups regarding the higher score of DASS. Indeed, true heterogeneities were observed across studies for the two abovementioned parameters.
FIGURE 2
PRISMA flow diagram. SCL90 Symptom Checklist 90, BSI Brief Symptom Inventory, STAI State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form, and DASS Depression Anxiety Stress Scale.
FIGURE 3
Forest plot mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the meta-analysis on psychological assessment score and association with infertility: Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) (A–C) (Anxiety, Depression, and Stress respectively); Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL90) (D). Horizontal lines represent 95% CI.
Discussion
In our meta-analysis, we found a statistically significant higher score of SCL90 but there was not a statistically significant association between a higher score of DASS and infertility. Only one study was performed regarding the relationship between BSI and STAI in association with infertility. Therefore, further study is needed to investigate the association between infertility and BSI and STAI. In line with our findings, Petersen et al. in gynecologic cancer (Petersen et al., 2005), Shi et al. in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) (Shi et al., 2011), and Pan et al. (2013) in breast cancer reported higher SCL90 scores in subjects compared with the control group. Similar investigations were also performed. Barber and Steadman demonstrated a non-significantly different DASS score in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women (Barber and Steadman, 2018). In contrast, Rothemund et al. observed no significant difference regarding the SCL90 score in women at high risk for breast cancer (Rothemund et al., 2001). Furthermore, Ali et al., Jamshidian-QalehShahi et al., and Ho et al. reported higher DASS scores in subjects with infertility (Ali et al., 2011; Jamshidian-QalehShahi et al., 2017; Ho et al., 2020).
In comparison with the DASS, the SCL90 is used to measure more general psychological symptoms (Eivors et al., 2008). Additionally, it examines more general and complete psychological distress among people compared with the DASS score (Modabernia et al., 2010). Indeed, the physicalization and obsessive-compulsive scales, which are higher in infertile cases, are included in the SCL90 while they are not measured by the DASS score (Conrad et al., 2003; Burns, 2007). One of the scales which is examined more completely in the SCL90 test than the DASS score and is also observed in infertile people is interpersonal sensitivity, i.e., infertile people usually have a higher score on this scale due to the psychological nature of infertility (Noorbala et al., 2009). Furthermore, one of the scales that exists meaningfully in infertile people and is measured by the SCL90 test is paranoid ideations due to the psychological burden of bereavement in infertility (Sadeghian et al., 2006). In general, the SCL90 test examines the psychological symptoms caused by infertility in a wider way than the DASS test, and it is a more reliable scale for measuring the overall symptoms. However, the DASS test, which is applied for the measurement of depression, stress, and anxiety, is more specialized than the SCL90 since it examines these three scales, and if the goal is only to examine these three scales, the DASS test will be more specialized (Parkitny and McAuley, 2010b).
The components of anxiety and depression exist in infertile patients. Since the nature of infertility is felt by infertile people, such as experiencing grief and experiencing a feeling of deficiency in the body, the intensity of these components will increase psychologically in these people. Generally, some aspects of depression are caused by the feeling of impaired efficiency (Lapane et al., 1995). In addition, biological data indicate decreased serotonin and norepinephrine levels in these people following the emergence of depression problems (Shi et al., 2011). Studies demonstrate the negative impacts of these two factors on fertility treatment (Szkodziak et al., 2020).
A study on a rat sample of depression and menopause illustrated significantly higher levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), Luteinizing hormone (LH), cortisone, and Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) in groups exposed to mild stress factors vs. those without such an exposure. On the other hand, dopamine levels were lower in the stress groups (Gu et al., 2018).
Men and women equally suffer from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that most often develops in early life. Infertile cases with a history of OCD might be focused on contamination obsessions and cleaning rituals associated with infertility treatments due to their assumption regarding sterile techniques associated with injections as a part of various treatments for infertility (Williams and Koran, 1997) that can enhance their exclusive compulsive ritualistic behaviors and or trigger their newly emerged rituals. Treatment compliance can be impaired due to the existing needle and blood injury phobias and their associated unmanageable anxiety state. Caregivers might be required to adapt therapeutic protocols or request psychological or psychiatric care before going on treatment (Williams and Zappert, 2006). Cognitive behavioral therapies and behavioral strategies should also be encouraged (Williams and Zappert, 2006). A close association was observed between hypothalamus-pituitary disorders and psychological scores in PCOS. In the current study, we observed a significant positive correlation between serum concentration of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol and phobic subscale scores of SCL90 in total samples. Hostility subscale scores demonstrated a significant negative correlation with serum concentration of Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid of PCOS cases, however, no significant correlation was observed between other monoamine neurotransmitters and their metabolites and other subscales of the SCL90 score (Shi et al., 2011).
Several lines of research support the positive impacts of harp therapy, group psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and mind-body intervention (Eastern body-mind-spirit, Integrative body-mind-spirit, and mind-body intervention) on the pregnancy rate, anxiety level, or marital function of infertile couples (Ying et al., 2016). A complex intervention should be developed based on sound evidence to target both men and women in infertile couples who have undergone IVF treatment, especially during the stressful interval waiting for the results of pregnancy tests following failed cycles.
This meta-analysis has several limitations. First, the main limitation is the insufficient number of eligible performed studies containing the subgroup analysis. Second, psychological symptoms are non-specific, and they can be affected by various factors. Although some of these factors, such as age and gender, were considered in included studies, not all of them have been considered in the total associated factors. For a better understanding of the association between psychological status and infertility, it is advisable to consider all of the abovementioned factors. Additionally, the included studies derived from different sample sources and diverse applied methodologies, will naturally increase the data heterogeneity. Last, the low number of eligible articles, the moderate quality (mean of 5 in the NOS), and the high heterogeneity of effect sizes among the included studies in each independent meta-analysis are factors that affect reliability and are better avoided. Some other confounding factors, such as disease phase (acute or remission phase), the age of the disease onset, and the presence of concomitant psychopharmacological treatments of patients, were not considered in the meta-analysis.
In conclusion, we found evidence supporting an increased significant SCL90 score and a non-significant higher DASS score in infertility patients. The prevalence of psychological problems in infertile cases seems to be increasing in many countries. These findings suggest that psychological treatment might have some beneficial impacts on infertility cases. Further research is needed to confirm this association.
Statements
Author contributions
SAT, AHM, and AM designed the study. SAT, AHM, and AM collected data. SAT, AHM, AM, and MB wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbediniaN.HamadA. H.AliS. K. (2013). Psychology and Personality Types of Infertile and Fertile Women.Iraqi Nat. J. Nurs. Special.2663–70.
2
Adib-RadH.BasiratZ.FaramarziM.MostafazadehA.BijaniA. (2019). Psychological distress in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion: A case-control study.Turk. J. Obstetr. Gynecol.16:151. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2019.88899
3
AgarwalA.MulgundA.HamadaA.ChyatteM. R. (2015). A unique view on male infertility around the globe.Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol.131–9. 10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
4
AimagambetovaG.IssanovA.TerzicS.BapayevaG.UkybassovaT.BaikoshkarovaS.et al (2020). The effect of psychological distress on IVF outcomes: Reality or speculations?PLoS One15:e0242024. 10.1371/journal.pone.0242024
5
AkhondiM. M.RanjbarF.ShirzadM.ArdakaniZ. B.KamaliK.MohammadK. (2019). Practical difficulties in estimating the prevalence of primary infertility in Iran.Int. J. F. S.13:113.
6
AliS.SabihF.RashidF.JehanS.AnwarM. (2011). Psychological morbidity amongst infertile couples.J. Islamic Intl. Med. College63–7.
7
AslzakerM.PourshahbazA.Bagheri LankaraniN.MohammadkhaniP.GeranmayepourS. (2016). Effects of infertility stress, psychological symptoms, and quality of life on predicting success rate of IVF/ICSI treatment in infertile women.Practice Clin. Psychol.4275–281. 10.18869/acadpub.jpcp.4.4.275
8
BarberC. C.SteadmanJ. (2018). Distress levels in pregnant and matched non-pregnant women.Austr. New Zealand J. Obstetr. Gynaecol.58128–131. 10.1111/ajo.12712
9
BelevskaJ. (2015). The impact of psycho-education on in vitro fertilisation treatment efficiency.Prilozi36211–216. 10.1515/prilozi-2015-0069
10
BlundellR. (2007). Causes of infertility.Int. J. Mol. Med. Adv. Sci.363–65.
11
BoivinJ. (2003). A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility.Soc. Sci. Med.572325–2341. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00138-2
12
BoivinJ.GriffithsE.VenetisC. A. (2011). Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: Meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies.BMJ342:d223. 10.1136/bmj.d223
13
BurnsL. H. (2007). Psychiatric aspects of infertility and infertility treatments.Psychiatr. Clin. North Am.30689–716. 10.1016/j.psc.2007.08.001
14
ChenD.YuJ.WangW.-hHeC.-y (2008). Mental status of infertile women treated with IVF-ET and effects of outcome of their treatment.China J. Modern Med.12.
15
ChiH.-J.ParkI.-H.SunH.-G.KimJ.-W.LeeK.-H. (2016). Psychological distress and fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) in infertile Korean women: The first validation study of Korean FertiQoL.Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med.43:174. 10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.174
16
CongJ.LiP.ZhengL.TanJ. (2016). Prevalence and risk factors of infertility at a rural site of Northern China.PLoS One11:e0155563. 10.1371/journal.pone.0155563
17
ConradR.SchillingG.HagemannT.HaidlG.LiedtkeR. (2003). Somatization and alexithymia in male infertility. A replication study.Hautarzt54530–535. 10.1007/s00105-002-0469-y
18
CousineauT. M.GreenT. C.CorsiniE.SeibringA.ShowstackM. T.ApplegarthL.et al (2008). Online psychoeducational support for infertile women: A randomized controlled trial.Hum. Reprod.23554–566. 10.1093/humrep/dem306
19
DashtiS.LatiffL. A.HamidH. A.SaniS. M.Akhtari-ZavareM.Abu BakarA. S.et al (2016). Sexual dysfunction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome in Malaysia.Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.173747–3751.
20
DeD.RoyP. K.SarkhelS. (2017). A psychological study of male, female related and unexplained infertility in Indian urban couples.J. Reprod. Infant Psychol.35353–364. 10.1080/02646838.2017.1315632
21
DerogatisL. R.SpencerP. (1993). Brief symptom inventory: BSI, Vol. 18. Pearson Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson education.
22
DerogatisL. R.LipmanR.CoviL. (1977). SCL-90. Administration, scoring and procedures manual-I for the R (revised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scales series.Chicago: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
23
Direkvand MoghaddamA.DelpishehA.SayehmiriK. (2016). An investigation of the worldwide prevalence of infertility as a systematic review.Qom Univ. Med. Sci. J.1076–87.
24
DomarA. D.ZuttermeisterP. C.SeibelM.BensonH. (1992). Psychological improvement in infertile women after behavioral treatment: A replication.F. S.58144–147. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55151-6
25
DyerS. J.AbrahamsN.MokoenaN.LombardC. J.van der SpuyZ. M. (2005). Psychological distress among women suffering from couple infertility in South Africa: A quantitative assessment.Hum. Reprod.201938–1943. 10.1093/humrep/deh845
26
DyerS.ChambersG. M.de MouzonJ.NygrenK.-G.Zegers-HochschildF.MansourR.et al (2016). International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010.Hum. Reprod.311588–1609. 10.1093/humrep/dew082
27
EivorsA.ButtonE.WarnerS.TurnerK.FassinoS.Abbate-DagaG.et al (2008). Scl-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28
FaramarziM.KheirkhahF.EsmaelzadehS.AlipourA.HjiahmadiM.RahnamaJ. (2008). Is psychotherapy a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy to promote the mental health of infertile women? A randomized clinical trial.Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.14149–53. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.012
29
FrederiksenY.Farver-VestergaardI.SkovgårdN. G.IngerslevH. J.ZachariaeR. (2015). Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open5:e006592. 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006592
30
GameiroS.CanavarroM. C.BoivinJ. (2013). Patient centred care in infertility health care: Direct and indirect associations with wellbeing during treatment.Patient Educ. Counsel.93646–654. 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.015
31
GuS.JingL.LiY.HuangJ. H.WangF. (2018). Stress induced hormone and neuromodulator changes in menopausal depressive rats.Front. Psychiatry9:253. 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00253
32
Haemmerli KellerK.AlderG.LoewerL.FaehM.RohnerS.von WolffM. (2018). Treatment-related psychological stress in different in vitro fertilization therapies with and without gonadotropin stimulation.Acta Obstetr. Gynecol. Scand.97269–276. 10.1111/aogs.13281
33
HamdounaO. S. (2014). The psychological consequences of sterility among a sample of infertile women in Gaza City.J. Al Quds Open Univ. Educ. Psychol. Res. Stud.2:2.
34
HämmerliK.ZnojH.BergerT. (2010). Internet-based support for infertile patients: A randomized controlled study.J. Behav. Med.33135–146. 10.1007/s10865-009-9243-2
35
HigginsJ. P.AltmanD. G.GøtzscheP. C.JüniP.MoherD.OxmanA. D.et al (2011). The cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.BMJ343:d5928. 10.1136/bmj.d5928
36
HoT. T. T.LeM. T.TruongQ. V.NguyenV. Q. H.CaoN. T. (2020). Psychological burden in couples with infertility and its association with sexual dysfunction.Sex. Disabil.38123–133. 10.1007/s11195-019-09612-4
37
HosakaT.MatsubayashiH.SugiyamaY.IzumiS.-iMakinoT. (2002). Effect of psychiatric group intervention on natural-killer cell activity and pregnancy rate.Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry24353–356. 10.1016/S0163-8343(02)00194-9
38
HughesE. G.da SilvaA. M. (2011). A pilot study assessing art therapy as a mental health intervention for subfertile women.Hum. Reprod.26611–615. 10.1093/humrep/deq385
39
InhornM. C.PatrizioP. (2015). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.Hum. Reprod. Update21411–426. 10.1093/humupd/dmv016
40
IordǎchescuD. A.PaicaC. I.BocaA. E.GicǎC.PanaitescuA. M.PeltecuG.et al (2021). Anxiety, difficulties, and coping of infertile women.Healthcare9:466. 10.3390/healthcare9040466
41
JadadA. R.MooreR. A.CarrollD.JenkinsonC.ReynoldsD. J. M.GavaghanD. J.et al (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Control. Clin. Trials171–12. 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
42
Jamshidian-QalehShahiP.AghaeiA.GolparvarM. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of iranian–islamic positive therapy on depression. anxiety, and stress of infertile women.J. Isfahan Med. Sch.3570–76.
43
KalkhoranL. F.BahramiH.FarrokhiN. A.ZeraatiH.TarahomiM. (2011). Comparing anxiety, depression and sexual life satisfaction in two groups of fertile and infertile women in Tehran.J. Reprod. Infertil.12157–162.
44
KarimzadehM.SalsabiliN.AsbaghF. A.TeymouriR.PourmandG.NaeiniT. S. (2017). Psychological disorders among Iranian infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART).Iranian J. Public Health46:333.
45
KoumparouM.BakasP.PantosK.EconomouM.ChrousosG. (2021). Stress management and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): A pilot randomized controlled trial.Psychiatriki32290–299. 10.22365/jpsych.2021.029
46
KrauszC. (2011). Male infertility: Pathogenesis and clinical diagnosis.Best Practice Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.25271–285. 10.1016/j.beem.2010.08.006
47
KrauszC.Riera-EscamillaA. (2018). Genetics of male infertility.Nat. Rev. Urol.15369–384. 10.1038/s41585-018-0003-3
48
LancastleD.BoivinJ. (2008). A feasibility study of a brief coping intervention (PRCI) for the waiting period before a pregnancy test during fertility treatment.Hum. Reprod.232299–2307. 10.1093/humrep/den257
49
LapaneK. L.ZierlerS.LasaterT. M.SteinM.BarbourM. M.HumeA. L. (1995). Is a history of depressive symptoms associated with an increased risk of infertility in women?Psychos. Med.57509–513. 10.1097/00006842-199511000-00001
50
LasherasG.Mestre-BachG.CluaE.RodríguezI.Farré-SenderB. (2020). Cross-border reproductive care: Psychological distress in a sample of women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment with and without oocyte donation.Int. J. F. S.14:130.
51
LopesV. G. B. (2012). Are patients at risk for emotional maladjustment to fertility treatmant less willing to comply with treatment?: Results from the validation of the portuguese version of rhew SCREENIVF.Hum. Reprod.29293–302. 10.1093/humrep/det418
52
LucaG.ParrettiniS.SansoneA.CalafioreR.JanniniE. (2021). The Inferto-Sex Syndrome (ISS): Sexual dysfunction in fertility care setting and assisted reproduction.J. Endocrinol. Invest.442071–2102. 10.1007/s40618-021-01581-w
53
MarquesI.BalreiraM. L.TemótioJ. (2017). How does depressive and anxious symptomatology influence the intention of infertile couples to persist in fertility treatments?Berlin: XVII world congress of psychiatry.
54
McNaughton-CassillM. E.BostwickJ. M.ArthurN. J.RobinsonR. D.NealG. S. (2002). Efficacy of brief couples support groups developed to manage the stress of in vitro fertilization treatment.Mayo Clin. Proc.771060–1066. 10.4065/77.10.1060
55
McQueeneyD. A.StantonA. L.SigmonS. (1997). Efficacy of emotion-focused and problem-focused group therapies for women with fertility problems.J. Behav.Med.20313–331. 10.1023/A:1025560912766
56
ModaberniaM.ShojaieT. H.FalahiM.FaghirpourM. (2010). Normalizing SCL-90-R inventory in Guilan high-school students.J. Guilan Univ. Med. Sci.1958–65.
57
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.J. Clin. Epidemiol.621006–1012. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
58
MusaR.RamliR.YazmieA. W. A.KhadijahM. B. S.HayatiM. Y.MidinM.et al (2014). A preliminary study of the psychological differences in infertile couples and their relation to the coping styles.Compr. Psychiatry55S65–S69. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.01.001
59
NazM. S. G.TehraniF. R.LakT. B.MohammadzadehF.NasiriM.BadrF. K.et al (2020). Quality of life and emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome: A cross-sectional study.Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag.13:203. 10.2147/PRBM.S241192
60
NoorbalaA. A.RamazanzadehF.MalekafzaliH.AbediniaN.ForooshaniA. R.ShariatM.et al (2008). Effects of a psychological intervention on depression in infertile couples.Int. J. Gynecol. Obstetr.101248–252. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.12.010
61
NoorbalaA. A.RamezanzadehF.AbediniaN.NaghizadehM. M. (2009). Psychiatric disorders among infertile and fertile women.Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.44587–591. 10.1007/s00127-008-0467-1
62
NoorbalaA. A.RamezanzadehF.AbediniaN.YazdiS. A. B.JafarabadiM. (2007). Study of psychiatric disorders among fertile and infertile women and some predisposing factors.J. Fam. Reprod. Health6–11.
63
OzkanM.BaysalB. (2006). Emotional distress of infertile women in Turkey.Clin. Exp. Obstetr. Gynecol.3344–46.
64
PanX.-F.FeiM.-D.ZhangK. Y.FanZ.-L.FuF.-H.FanJ.-H. (2013). Psychopathological profile of women with breast cancer based on the symptom checklist-90-R.Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.146579–6584. 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.11.6579
65
PanagopoulouE.MontgomeryA.TarlatzisB. (2009). Experimental emotional disclosure in women undergoing infertility treatment: Are drop outs better off?Soc. Sci. Med.69678–681. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.031
66
ParkitnyL.McAuleyJ. (2010a). The depression anxiety stress scale (DASS).J. Physiother.56:204.
67
ParkitnyL.McAuleyJ. (2010b). The depression anxiety stress scale (DASS).J. Physiother.56:204.
68
PereiraB. S.MartinsR. S.BritoC. B.PereiraP. A. (2020). Influence of psychosocial factors on the effectiveness of infertility treatments.Acta Obstétr. Ginecol. Portuguesa14208–216.
69
PetersenR. W.GrahamG.QuinlivanJ. A. (2005). Psychologic changes after a gynecologic cancer.J. Obstetr. Gynaecol. Res.31152–157. 10.1111/j.1341-8076.2005.00263.x
70
PetersonJ.WelchV.LososM.TugwellP. (2011). The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.
71
PeyvandiS.HosseiniS. H.DaneshpourM.MohammadpourR.QolamiN. (2011). The prevalence of depression, anxiety and marital satisfaction and related factors in infertile women referred to infertility clinics of Sari city in 2008.J. Mazandaran Univ. Med. Sci.2026–32.
72
PodolskaM. (2011). Bidzan M. Niepłodność jako problem psychologiczny.Ginekol. Pol.8244–49.
73
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2013). Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: A committee opinion.F. S.99:63. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.023
74
RahimiR.HasanpourS.MirghafourvandM.EsmaeilpourK. (2021). Effect of Hope-oriented group counseling on mental health of infertile women with failed IVF cycles: A randomized controlled trial.BMC Psychiatry21:286. 10.1186/s12888-021-03280-5
75
RothemundY.PaepkeS.FlorH. (2001). Perception of risk, anxiety, and health behaviors in women at high risk for breast cancer.Int. J. Behav. Med.8230–239. 10.1207/S15327558IJBM0803_5
76
SadeghianE.HeydarianpourA.AbedP. (2006). Comparison of psychiatric problems in infertile men and women referring to infertility clinic of Hamadan Fatemyeh Hospital.Arak Med. Univ. J.931–39.
77
Santa-CruzD. C.Caparros-GonzalezR. A.Romero-GonzalezB.Peralta-RamirezM. I.Gonzalez-PerezR.García-VelascoJ. A. (2020). Hair cortisol concentrations as a biomarker to predict a clinical pregnancy outcome after an IVF cycle: A pilot feasibility study.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17:3020. 10.3390/ijerph17093020
78
SarkarS.GuptaP. (2016). Socio-demographic correlates of women’s infertility and treatment seeking behavior in India.J. Reprod. Infertil.17:123.
79
SeibelD.LoboD. S.MottaE. L.KoteckiJ. A.FuentesD.SerafiniP. C. (2003). Assessment of anxiety in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) by the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI).F. S.80:242. 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01591-7
80
ShiX.ZhangL.FuS.LiN. (2011). Co-involvement of psychological and neurological abnormalities in infertility with polycystic ovarian syndrome.Arch. Gynecol. Obstetr.284773–778. 10.1007/s00404-011-1947-1
81
SperoffL.FritzM. A. (2005). Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility.Philadelphia: lippincott Williams & wilkins.
82
SpielbergerC. D. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults.Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/t06496-000
83
SzkodziakF.KrzyżanowskiJ.SzkodziakP. (2020). Psychological aspects of infertility. A systematic review.J. Int. Med. Res.48:0300060520932403. 10.1177/0300060520932403
84
TanhaF. D.MohseniM.GhajarzadehM. (2014). Sexual function in women with primary and secondary infertility in comparison with controls.Int. J. Impotence Res.26132–134. 10.1038/ijir.2013.51
85
TurnerK.Reynolds-MayM. F.ZitekE. M.TisdaleR. L.CarlisleA. B.WestphalL. M. (2013). Stress and anxiety scores in first and repeat IVF cycles: A pilot study.PLoS One8:e63743. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063743
86
Van den BroeckU.D’HoogheT.EnzlinP.DemyttenaereK. (2010). Predictors of psychological distress in patients starting IVF treatment: Infertility-specific versus general psychological characteristics.Hum. Reprod.251471–1480. 10.1093/humrep/deq030
87
VikströmJ.JosefssonA.BladhM.SydsjöG. (2015). Mental health in women 20–23 years after IVF treatment: A Swedish cross-sectional study.BMJ Open5:e009426. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009426
88
VizhehM.PakgoharM.BabaeiG.RamezanzadehF. (2013). Effect of counseling on quality of marital relationship of infertile couples: A randomized, controlled trial (RCT) study.Arch. Gynecol. Obstetr.287583–589. 10.1007/s00404-012-2595-9
89
WangK.LiJ.ZhangJ. X.ZhangL.YuJ.JiangP. (2007). Psychological characteristics and marital quality of infertile women registered for in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in China.F. S.87792–798. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1534
90
WilliamsK. E.KoranL. M. (1997). Obsessive-compulsive disorder in pregnancy, the puerperium, and the premenstruum.J. Clin. Psychiatry58:13029. 10.4088/JCP.v58n0709
91
WilliamsK. E.ZappertL. N. (2006). “Psychopathology and psychopharmacology in the infertile patient,” in Infertility counseling: A comprehensive handbook for clinicians, edsCovingtonS.BurnsL. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 97–116. 10.1017/CBO9780511547263.008
92
XuH.OuyangN.LiR.TuoP.MaiM.WangW. (2017). The effects of anxiety and depression on in vitro fertilisation outcomes of infertile Chinese women.Psychol. Health. Med.2237–43. 10.1080/13548506.2016.1218031
93
YingL.WuL. H.LokeA. Y. (2016). The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: A systematic review.J. Assisted Reprod. Genet.33689–701. 10.1007/s10815-016-0690-8
94
YusufL. (2016). Depression, anxiety and stress among female patients of infertility. A case control study.Pakistan J. Med. Sci.32:1340. 10.12669/pjms.326.10828
95
ZaigI.AzemF.SchreiberS.Gottlieb-LitvinY.MeiboomH.BlochM. (2012). Women’s psychological profile and psychiatric diagnoses and the outcome of in vitro fertilization: Is there an association?Arch. Womens Men. Health15353–359. 10.1007/s00737-012-0293-z
Summary
Keywords
infertility, psychological assessment, SCL90, BSI, DASS, STAI
Citation
Tavousi SA, Behjati M, Milajerdi A and Mohammadi AH (2022) Psychological assessment in infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 13:961722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961722
Received
05 June 2022
Accepted
03 October 2022
Published
28 October 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Alessandro Giuliani, National Institute of Health (ISS), Italy
Reviewed by
Abubakr Abdelraouf Alfadl, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia; Mohammad Karimian, University of Mazandaran, Iran
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Tavousi, Behjati, Milajerdi and Mohammadi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Amir Hossein Mohammadi, 921811353023s@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.