ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 07 February 2012

Sec. Plant Physiology

Volume 3 - 2012 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00017

Diversification and Expression of the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB Families of Putative Auxin Transporters in Populus

  • NC

    Nicola Carraro 1

  • TE

    Tracy Eizabeth Tisdale-Orr 2

  • RM

    Ronald Matthew Clouse 3

  • AS

    Anne Sophie Knöller 4

  • RS

    Rachel Spicer 5*

  • 1. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN, USA

  • 2. Rowland Institute at Harvard Cambridge, MA, USA

  • 3. Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History New York, NY, USA

  • 4. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps University Marburg, Germany

  • 5. Department of Botany, Connecticut College New London, CT, USA

Abstract

Intercellular transport of the plant hormone auxin is mediated by three families of membrane-bound protein carriers, with the PIN and ABCB families coding primarily for efflux proteins and the AUX/LAX family coding for influx proteins. In the last decade our understanding of gene and protein function for these transporters in Arabidopsis has expanded rapidly but very little is known about their role in woody plant development. Here we present a comprehensive account of all three families in the model woody species Populus, including chromosome distribution, protein structure, quantitative gene expression, and evolutionary relationships. The PIN and AUX/LAX gene families in Populus comprise 16 and 8 members respectively and show evidence for the retention of paralogs following a relatively recent whole genome duplication. There is also differential expression across tissues within many gene pairs. The ABCB family is previously undescribed in Populus and includes 20 members, showing a much deeper evolutionary history, including both tandem and whole genome duplication as well as probable gene loss. A striking number of these transporters are expressed in developing Populus stems and we suggest that evolutionary and structural relationships with known auxin transporters in Arabidopsis can point toward candidate genes for further study in Populus. This is especially important for the ABCBs, which is a large family and includes members in Arabidopsis that are able to transport other substrates in addition to auxin. Protein modeling, sequence alignment and expression data all point to ABCB1.1 as a likely auxin transport protein in Populus. Given that basipetal auxin flow through the cambial zone shapes the development of woody stems, it is important that we identify the full complement of genes involved in this process. This work should lay the foundation for studies targeting specific proteins for functional characterization and in situ localization.

Introduction

Plant development is highly plastic owing to growth via meristems, and this plasticity is fundamental to the ability of plants, as sessile organisms, to adapt to changing environments. Developmental flexibility is particularly important for trees, which can live for thousands of years in the same place, growing massive bodies that must face a multitude of environmental challenges. The plant hormone auxin is well established as a key regulator of plant morphogenesis and in recent years the molecular mechanisms of transport and action have been elucidated. With the publication of the Populus trichocarpa genome (Tuskan et al., 2006), new tools to improve our understanding of secondary growth − the type of vascular growth that defines woody plants − became available. Populus is not only the dominant model species for woody plant growth, but also a valuable crop for pulp, bioenergy production, and carbon sequestration. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that underlie auxin transport in Populus is of interest both in the context of the evolution of plant development and as a means to manipulate plant architecture, biomass production, and fiber quality.

The auxins as a group include several molecules, with the most abundant natural form in plants being indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Auxin synthesis occurs in young, actively growing tissues including shoot tips, young leaves, and germinating seeds (Ljung et al., 2001a,b), and increasing evidence suggests that synthesis takes place in the roots as well (Ljung et al., 2005). Auxin moves from the sites of production throughout the plant via two routes: long distance transport of conjugated forms in the phloem and short distance transport of “free” (non-conjugated) auxin via polar auxin transport (PAT). By far the better studied route, PAT is a form of active intercellular transport mediated by proteins inserted in the plasma membrane that belong to three distinct families. The PIN and ABCB families encode efflux proteins (i.e., proteins that facilitate movement out of cells), whereas members of the AUX/LAX family facilitate auxin entry into cells, along with passive diffusion. PAT is relatively slow (5–20 mm/h; Lomax et al., 1995), saturable and can be impaired by the application of both competitive inhibitors and inhibitors of protein synthesis (Katekar and Geissler, 1980; Sussman and Goldsmith, 1981). This form of transport is considered polar because the protein carriers are often asymmetrically positioned in the plasma membrane such that transport is directional. Transport directionality can then be altered on relatively short timescales in response to repositioning of the protein carriers. Feedback mechanisms also exist such that PAT is often self-reinforcing, with multiple transport proteins themselves being upregulated by auxin (Sauer et al., 2006; Titapiwatanakun and Murphy, 2009).

The PIN proteins have been studied extensively in Arabidopsis thaliana (Chen et al., 1998; Luschnig et al., 1998; Müller et al., 1998; Utsuno et al., 1998; Friml et al., 2002a,b, 2003) and show dynamic polar localization at the plasma membrane (PIN1, PIN2, PIN3, PIN7) or in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (PIN5, PIN6, PIN8; Mravec et al., 2009; Friml and Jones, 2010). PIN1 was first described as mediating PAT and determining organ outgrowth at the inflorescence (Okada et al., 1991; Gälweiler et al., 1998; Vernoux et al., 2011). Subsequently its role in embryogenesis, vein patterning, vascular development, and root development were established (Friml et al., 2003; Vieten et al., 2005; Scarpella et al., 2006; Petrásek and Friml, 2009). The characterization of PIN genes has been expanded to include the monocotyledons Zea mays and Oryza sativa, both of which express several PINs thought to be specific to the monocots. In maize, ZmPIN1a, b, and c are responsible for directing auxin transport in the male and female inflorescences and in the floret meristems (Carraro et al., 2006; Wu and McSteen, 2007). They are also involved in endosperm and embryonic development (Forestan et al., 2010) and in the maintenance of phyllotaxy (Lee et al., 2009). The monocot-specific PINs from rice (OsPIN9, OsPIN10a, and OsPIN10b) are highly expressed in adventitious root primordia and pericycle cells at the stem-base, suggesting that they may have evolved to promote adventitious root development (Wang et al., 2009).

Members of the AUXIN/LIKE AUXIN (AUX/LAX) family in Arabidopsis (Bennett et al., 1996; Yemm et al., 2004) are largely responsible for auxin influx, although the protonated form of auxin (IAAH) is able to passively diffuse into cells. The founder member AUX1 encodes a plasma membrane protein that belongs to the amino acid permease family of proton-driven transporters and functions as an anionic symporter (Swarup et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2006). AUX1-mediated IAA uptake is implicated in gravitropic response, as the agravitropic phenotype of the aux1 mutant can be phenocopied in wild-type seedlings by applying the auxin influx carrier inhibitor 1-naphthoxyaceticacids (1-NOA) and rescued using the membrane-permeable auxin 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA; Swarup et al., 2001; Yemm et al., 2004). The paralogs of AUX1, LAX1, LAX2, and LAX3 encode proteins that maintain a correct phyllotactic pattern at the shoot apical meristem (SAM), as they act together with PIN1-mediated auxin efflux (Bainbridge et al., 2008). LAX3 is also involved in the development of lateral root primordia (Swarup et al., 2008).

The involvement of ABCB [ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters of the B class, previously known as multidrug resistance (MDR)/Phosphoglycoprotein (PGP)] proteins in auxin transport was first hypothesized when expression of ABCB1/PGP1 in Arabidopsis was found to regulate hypocotyl elongation in a light-dependent fashion (Sidler et al., 1998). Subsequently, ABCB1 was shown to function with ABCB19/PGP19/MDR1 in mediating PAT (Noh et al., 2001). ABCB1 and ABCB19 are the closest Arabidopsis orthologs of mammalian ABCB1-type MDR transporters and although specificity for auxin is not assured (Lee et al., 2008), some appear to transport auxin with relatively high substrate specificity (Titapiwatanakun and Murphy, 2009; Yang and Murphy, 2009). ABCB14 and ABCB15 promote auxin transport along the inflorescence of Arabidopsis, where they are expressed in vascular tissue and interfascicular fibers. Inflorescence stems in both knockout mutants show a reduction in PAT (Kaneda et al., 2011). ABCB4 from Arabidopsis is involved in basipetal PAT in the root (Terasaka et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2007; Kubeš et al., 2011) and, although most ABCBs studied to date function as efflux carriers, heterologous expression of ABCB4 suggests that it functions as an auxin influx carrier under low concentrations of IAA and reverses to efflux when IAA concentrations increase (Yang and Murphy, 2009). The ABCB1/PGP1 ortholog has been cloned in maize (Brachytic2/ZmPGP1) and in Sorghum bicolor (dwarf3/SbPGP1) and shown to be responsible for IAA transport along the stem (Multani et al., 2003; Knöller et al., 2010).

Our understanding of PAT and its role in development has advanced considerably in Arabidopsis and to a lesser extent in monocots, but the functional significance of these transport proteins − particularly the ABCBs − remain largely unknown in woody plants. Woody plants are defined by the production of secondary vascular tissue, specifically secondary xylem and phloem. These vascular tissues are derived from a lateral meristem called the vascular cambium that encircles the stem, adding new cells that will ultimately differentiate into xylem toward the inside of the stem and phloem toward the outside. Given the demonstrated role of PAT in vascular development in herbaceous plants it seems logical to expect a role in secondary growth. Indeed, the vascular cambium contains high levels of IAA in both Pinus and Populus, with a peak concentration occurring either in the cambial initials themselves, or perhaps more likely, in the earliest differentiating xylem elements (Uggla et al., 1996, 1998; Tuominen et al., 1997; Hellgren et al., 2004). Concentrations rapidly decline through the regions of cell differentiation to near zero in mature secondary xylem and phloem. Auxin transport in the cambium is basipetal (Lachaud and Bonnemain, 1984; Uggla et al., 1998; Kramer et al., 2008) and several members of the PIN and AUX/LAX gene families are expressed in developing Populus stems (Schrader et al., 2003, 2004; Nilsson et al., 2008). Furthermore, expression of one or more PIN and AUX/LAX genes is downregulated with the onset of dormancy (Schrader et al., 2003, 2004) and upregulated following exogenous application of IAA and/or gibberellins (Schrader et al., 2003; Björklund et al., 2007). Despite several excellent studies in Populus, our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that regulate PAT in woody plants is essentially restricted to the expression patterns of just three PIN and AUX/LAX genes. A more comprehensive understanding of PAT gene and protein function in Populus will help to clarify the molecular mechanisms controlling vascular pattering in woody plants and explain the link(s) between short and long distance auxin transport in species with extensive stem development.

Here we present the first comprehensive account of the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB gene families in Populus, which contain 16, 8, and 20 members respectively. We investigate the history of gene family members relative to each other within Populus and relative to proposed orthologs in Arabidopsis. Through phylogenetic analysis we describe the timing of the diversification of the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB gene families relative to when plants colonized land. Because the transport function of the ABCB proteins is less understood and their specificity for auxin has not been completely elucidated, we model the protein structures for Populus ABCBs and compare these to known Arabidopsis ABCB transporters. We then provide expression data for all putative auxin transporters in Populus, including presence or absence data for each gene in the cortex, phloem, cambial zone, and xylem of mature stems. We present quantitative RT-PCR expression levels for whole plantlets, internodes just beginning to form secondary vascular tissue, roots and developing xylem from mature stems. Lastly, in order to determine the most likely contributors to the positive feedback mechanism driving “canalization” of auxin flow during vascular development, we test the response of PIN, ABCB, and AUX/LAX genes to exogenous IAA application. These findings should lay the foundation for the functional characterization of members of each family and suggest which proteins are likely to be important regulators of secondary growth.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

Populus tremula × alba hybrid clone INRA 717-1B4 was chosen for all experimental procedures. In vitro plants were grown on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) supplemented with 2% sucrose, 0.25 mg ml−1MES, 0.04 mg ml−1 glycine, and 0.2 mg ml−1 myo-inositol at 25 ± 2°C under 16 h day length conditions using GE 20W F20T12 growth lamps. Greenhouse plants were grown in 2:1:1 promix HP: perlite:vermiculite supplemented with 19–6–12 N–P–K slow release fertilizer. Greenhouse temperatures were maintained around 22 ± 5°C and day light supplemented to achieve a 16 h day length using metal halide lamps.

Identification of PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB gene and protein families

Populus trichocarpa gene and protein sequences were retrieved from the Joint Genome Institute’s (JGI) P. trichocarpa v.1.1 database1. Henceforth we refer to these genes and gene families as PtrPIN, PtrAUX, and PtrABCB. When reporting expression data, we will refer to the same genes from P. tremula × alba (abbreviated as Pta, i.e., PtaPIN1). The PIN and AUX/LAX sequences had been previously annotated and we maintained the original nomenclature including the AUX and LAX names for every member of the AUX/LAX family from P. trichocarpa (i.e., PtrAUX1–LAX5). Every sequence was used as query with the BLASTn algorithm to search the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide collection database to confirm sequence identity. Putative ABCB genes in the P. trichocarpa genome were identified in the same database using 22 ArabidopsisABCB gene sequences retrieved from the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Research database (TAIR)2. The JGI P. trichocarpa v.1.1 database was also searched using the terms “MDR” and “ATP” as queries. A third search was conducted using the retrieved sequences to interrogate the Populus DataBase (PopulusDB)3. Finally all retrieved sequences were confirmed as encoding putative auxin transporters by searching the phytozome v.7.0 database4. All the remaining PIN, AUX/LAX and ABCB sequences from other species were retrieved from phytozome v.7.0, TAIR10, The Rice Genome Annotation Project5, and MaizeGDB6. The complete list of retrieved genes is provided in Table A4 in Appendix. All sequences were inspected for redundancy and presence of pseudogenes and invalid gene models were discarded. ABCB protein sequences were used as queries to search the PROSITE database7 to confirm the presence of the TMD–NBD–TMD–NBD (transmembrane domain, nucleotide-binding domain) structure and the ABC C-motif. This allowed to rule out the presence of ABC half transporters and other ABC proteins not belonging to class B (Sanchez-Fernandez et al., 2001) and to classify the genes according to their full length structure, conserved motifs, sequence similarity, and EST support. Intron–exon structures of P. trichocarpa PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB genes were produced using the online tool GSDS, Gene Structure Display Server (Guo et al., 2007)8. The genome representation for Populus was created using the online tool SyMAP v.3.59

PtrABCB, PIN, and AUX/LAX structure analysis and PtrABCB modeling

Transmembrane domains were predicted using the online tools TMHMM Server v.2.010 and Aramemnon11. The protein structure of Sav1866 and MDR1 were obtained from the PDB (Protein Data Bank) database12. The predicted protein structures of AtABCB1 and 4 have been previously generated by Yang and Murphy (2009). Arabidopsis templates (ABCB1 or 4) were chosen based on closest sequence identity. To generate the alignment files of Populus ABCB protein sequences and Arabidopsis ABCB sequences, Multialin13 was used with default settings. The output file was manually edited to meet Modeller 9v5 requirements14. The predicted 3D protein structure was generated using the python script Modeller 9v5. Three structures were generated and the quality was determined according to the manual (Wiederstein and Sippl, 2007). The best model was used for substrate docking. Furthermore, the quality of the protein model was tested using the program ProSA15. Substrate docking was performed using MEDOCK16. PDB files of all proteins were translated into pdbq files using the PDB2PQR server17. For substrate docking prediction, the nucleotide-binding folds (NBFs) were removed. All loops connecting the TMDs were removed to reduce the size of the file. Finally, the pdbq file of IAA was produced with the Dundee PRODRG2 Server (Dolinsky et al., 2004, 2007)18. Each run had a docking repeat of five times and four runs were performed, resulting in a total of 20 molecules docked to the protein structure. Protein models were displayed using PyMol19.

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenic reconstruction was conducted using the coding sequences of 18 species, including 3 monocotyledonous and 10 dicotyledonous plants. Sequences from the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Merchant et al., 2007) and Volvox carteri (Prochnik et al., 2010), the moss Physcomitrella patens (Rensing et al., 2008) and the lycopod Selaginella moellendorffii (Banks et al., 2011) were also included. For each coding sequence, three types of trees were retrieved from two different alignments. The first alignment was generated in concert with the tree search, a method called “dynamic homology” (Wheeler, 1996). 149, 68, and 245 unaligned coding sequences from the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB families (Table A4 in Appendix) were read into the phylogenetic program POY v.4.1.2 (Varón et al., 2009) and trees and alignments were searched simultaneously for the least costly sequence alignment and tree topology combination under the parsimony criterion. A second alignment was generated in the program MAFFT (Katoh et al., 2009), where the same sequences were aligned under a gap opening cost of 4 and a gap extension cost of 0.05. This alignment was then input to the program Gblocks v.0.91b (Castresana, 2000; Talavera and Castresana, 2007), which removes regions with multiple gaps and of dubious homology. Gblocks was run with default settings, except that gaps were allowed in all parts of the resulting alignment (such as in cases where one or a few sequences have a clear insertion or deletion). The alignment output by Gblocks was then used for tree searching in POY, where it was read as pre-aligned. Both unaligned and aligned POY tree searches were immediately followed by bootstrap searches, where 100 pseudoreplicates were searched starting with one Wagner tree each. Tree searches were conducted on a parallel computing cluster, using 24 processors searching for a maximum of 6 h of automated searching (in which POY decides on the best combination of builds, swapping, ratchet, and fusing) with dynamic homology and 16 processors for the pre-aligned data. For dynamic homology, in both the tree searches and the bootstrap calculations, the data were divided by the program into seemingly homologous blocks before searching using the command “auto_sequence_partition,” which greatly increases search speed. For all POY searches, the costs of transitions, transversions, and insertion/deletion events were the same.

The alignment from Gblocks was also used for a maximum likelihood search in RaxML (Stamatakis et al., 2008) on the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al., 2010)20. The alignment was first uploaded and converted to relaxed Phylip format and then tree searches were performed with likelihood bootstrap in which the best tree is reported along with the results of a 100-pseudoreplicate bootstrap calculation. The program was allowed to determine the best model (the GAMMA Model was chosen) and other parameters automatically before tree searching. All trees were visualized and edited using FigTree v.1.3.121

DNA and RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA from whole in vitro-grown plantlets, internodes, roots, and developing xylem was extracted using the Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Aliquots of approximately 100 mg developing xylem tissue were homogenized with a Mini Bead Beater (BioSpec Products Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA) and stainless steel beads. mRNA from 20 μm-thick frozen sections from the cortex, secondary phloem, cambium, and secondary xylem was extracted using the DynaBeads mRNA Direct Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions using approximately 100 mg fresh leaf tissue. DNA and RNA concentrations were measured with a NanoDrop 2000™ (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Total RNA was treated with TURBO DNA-free™ (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized from 1.5 μg of total RNA using SuperscriptII reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with the oligodt20 primer. RT-PCR reaction cycles were carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions including a final 20 min incubation step with RNAseH (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA concentration was measured with a Nanodrop 2000™ and the cDNA was diluted to 170 ng μl−1.

Amplification, cloning and sequencing of 3′ end PCR products

In order to amplify the 3′ end untranslated region (UTR) of transcripts that could not be detected in quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) reactions with at least three different primer pairs, reverse transcription reactions were carried out using the Adp1-dt17 primer (Kramer et al., 1998) and SuperscriptII reverse transcriptase according to manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was amplified using the Adp1 primer coupled to the corresponding forward primer specifically designed to amplify the 3′ end of the transcript (the complete list of primers is provided in Table A5 in Appendix). The PCR amplifications were carried out with Taq DNA polymerase (SIGMA, St. Louis, MO, USA) or Amplitaq® Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems™, Foster City, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. PCR products were run on 1% agarose gels, gel purified using the Zymoclean™ Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and cloned into the pGEM®-T Easy Vector Systems (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Colonies were grown on LB plates containing 100 mg/ml ampicillin. Following PCR amplification, positive colonies were grown in 4 ml of LB medium containing 100 mg/ml ampicillin, at 37°C, over night. Plasmid DNA was extracted using the Qiagen Plasmid Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmids were sequenced by Eurofins MWG Operon (Huntsville, AL, USA). Sequences were aligned using the Vector NTI Advance™ 10.3.0 AlignX module (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Quantitative real time PCR was carried out on the MX3000P and MX3005P systems (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) using Brilliant™ SYBR® Green QPCR Master Mix (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The SYBR® Green (with dissociation curve) experimental setup was used. Plates were manually loaded and reactions were carried out in a total volume of 20 μl, using 75 ng of cDNA per reaction. Reactions were run in triplicate. Primer pairs were designed using Primer3 software22, analyzed with OlygoAnalyzer 3.1 software23 for melting temperature, oligo-, hetero-dimer, and hairpin structure formation, synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, IA) and tested with conventional PCR to verify amplification of a single product. Following primer titration, a final concentration of 250 nM for each primer was chosen. In qRT-PCR experiments the following thermal cycling conditions were used: activation step of 10 min at 95°C; 40 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 25 s at 57°C, 25 s at 72°C; fluorescence was collected at the end of each extension step. A melting curve analysis was performed.

Efficiency-corrected expression values were calculated based on standard curves for all genes (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001; Pfaffl, 2001). Standard curves were run in triplicate for every gene in every cDNA batch and amplification efficiencies were calculated from the standard curve slopes. Baseline-subtracted and ROX-normalized fluorescence readings were collected with the MX3005P software v.4.01. Expression values were normalized to the geometric mean of four housekeeping genes (PtaPD-E1, PtaUBQ1, PtaTUA2, PtaACT2) that were found, in our hands, to have the highest amplification efficiency and most stable expression across different tissues (Vandesompele et al., 2002; Brunner et al., 2004; Gutierrez et al., 2008). For expression following exogenous IAA application, the same set of normalizers was used in a comparative quantitation experiment comparing treated and untreated control tissues.

IAA treatments

Two-month-old P. tremula × alba was grown in the greenhouse. Approximately 1-cm-long segments of internodes between four and eight nodes beneath the shoot apex and actively growing root tips were collected and incubated at room temperature in 30 μM IAA in liquid growth media (half-strength MS salts, 2% sucrose, 0.25 mg ml−1 MES, 0.04 mg/ml glycine, and 0.2 mg ml−1 myo-inositol) for 6 h in the dark following a 15 min vacuum infiltration. The same conditions were used for negative controls (no IAA). Tissues were frozen in liquid N2 and ground for RNA extraction.

Results

Chromosomal distribution and gene duplication in the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB families of Populus

Nearly every locus coding for a PIN, AUX/LAX, or ABCB protein has a corresponding paralogous locus in another chromosomal block (Figure 1). Populus has exactly twice the number of PIN (16) and AUX/LAX (8) genes as Arabidopsis (eight and four, respectively) and these genes form pairs with highly similar coding sequences, which may be the consequence of the relatively recent genome duplication (Figures 1, 2, and 3). Neither the PIN loci nor the AUX/LAX loci appear to be derived from tandem duplications. In contrast, three tandem duplicated ABCB loci pairs (PtrABCB2–PtrABCB8, PtrABCB10–PtrABCB11, and PtrABCB13–PtrABCB14) are present in the Populus genome. Unlike the PIN and AUX/LAX families, the ABCB genes are more randomly distributed between corresponding and non-corresponding duplicated regions, with nine members that do not present any paired gene on another chromosome (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Gene and protein structure of the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB families of Populus

We identified a total of 44 Populus genes encoding putative auxin transport proteins, including 16 PIN, 8 AUX/LAX, and 20 PtrABCB loci. The complete list of P. trichocarpa PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB gene names, gene models, and loci can be found in Table A2 in Appendix. The PIN genes of Populus present a conserved intron–exon organization which is illustrated in Figure A1 in Appendix. The same structural characteristics are present across PINs from different plant species including Arabidopsis (Mravec et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Shen et al., 2010). The proteins belonging to the PtrPIN family range from 347 to 650 amino acids in length. In Populus, seven, three, and six PIN proteins present long, reduced and short central hydrophilic domains respectively. In general, there is no strict correlation between the length of the genomic sequence of loci coding for auxin transporters and their protein product length (Figure A1 and Table A3 in Appendix). One locus (PtrPIN14) is classified as encoding a pseudogene. The proteins for the PtrAUX/LAX family range from 465 to 492 amino acids and present the most conserved sequence among the three families of putative auxin transporters. Their primary sequence is generally conserved across the plant kingdom and Populus has twice the number of AUX/LAX coding loci compared to Arabidopsis. All of the PtrAUX/LAX proteins have 11 predicted transmembrane domains. All the ABCB loci from P. trichocarpa encode proteins with a repeated TMD–NBD structure and carry a predicted nucleotide-binding domain signature ([AG]- × (4)-G-K-[ST]; Rea, 2007; Verrier et al., 2008). Their length varies between 1141 and 1578 amino acids and the two regions integral to the plasma membrane are highly hydrophobic and comprise 7–12 transmembrane helices. In addition to these two conserved modules, a more variable and less hydrophobic linker region connects the first NBD to the second TMD in all PtrABCB proteins.

Identification of predicted IAA membrane transporters from the ABCB family of Populus

After analysis of the primary structure of the PtrABCB proteins, models of tertiary structure were produced using all 20 ABCB amino acid sequences. Structural models were displayed using PyMol (Figure A2 in Appendix) in order to determine which PtrABCBs are the most likely candidates for IAA transport. Although pairwise comparison of amino acid sequences can provide a first estimate of which proteins are the true orthologs of confirmed Arabidopsis auxin transporters (AtABCB1, AtABCB19, and AtABCB4), this information should be supported with the identification of IAA docking sites and transmembrane barrel structure predictions (Yang and Murphy, 2009). Among all PtrABCBs, 10 are predicted to have one or more IAA binding sites (Figure A2 in Appendix). In Arabidopsis, IAA is primarily docked at two binding sites in the TMDs of ABCB19 while ABCB4 has a unique additional binding site (Yang and Murphy, 2009). In Populus, ABCB1.1/ABCB1.2 and ABCB19 have the most similar sequence to AtABCB1 and AtABCB19 and have two, five, and three predicted binding pockets respectively.

Reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships in the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB gene families of Populus

All three phylogenetic analyses (parsimony using unaligned and aligned sequences and maximum likelihood with aligned sequences) generally resulted in well resolved, reasonable, highly supported trees, indicating considerable phylogenetic signal in the sequence data, which was robust to different methods of analysis. Here we show the trees for all three gene families found under maximum likelihood and the tree found under dynamic homology and parsimony for the ABCB family (Figures 2, 3, and 4; Figure A3 in Appendix). The three different analyses showed the same general patterns in each gene family, although the PIN analysis was more sensitive to the difference between likelihood and parsimony, the latter producing long, pectinate clades containing a mixture of taxonomic groups.

Figure 4

The PIN genes of basal land plants (Physcomitrella and Selaginella in our analysis) cluster at the base of the tree, with the exception of PpPIN1D (Figure 2A). The placement of PpPIN1D may indicate an erroneous or highly derived sequence, as its placement was unstable and with low bootstrap support and it was recovered in the likelihood tree on an extremely long branch. The angiosperm PINs initially split into two large clades, with subsequent splits that show the monocot/dicot divergence four or five times, although support for several of these nodes is weak (Figure 2). There is also the frequent occurrence of clear sister pairs of PINs in Populus.

The AUX/LAX analysis similarly places the basal land plant AUX/LAX genes in a grade at the base of the tree followed by two large clades of angiosperms (albeit with weak support; Figure 3). The monocot AUX/LAX genes were recovered as two closely related clades under maximum likelihood (Figure 3B) but were recovered as a single clade when the aligned data were analyzed under parsimony (trees not shown). All PopulusAUX/LAX genes were recovered as sister pairs or, in the case of PtrAUX1–LAX5 and PtrAUX2–LAX1, as closely related in a clade with the P. tomentosa and P. tremula × tremuloidesAUX/LAXs.

In contrast to the PIN and AUX/LAX trees, clades, or paraphyletic grades of basal land plant ABCBs were recovered in several different locations throughout each tree, often as sister to angiosperm clades that subsequently showed the monocot/dicot split (Figure 4). We included coding sequences from the green algae in our ABCB analysis: two putative ABCB transporters from C. reinhardtii (Cre17_g725200 and Cre17_g725150) and one ABCB-like sequence from V. carteri (Vcprot1), the latter used to root each ABCB tree. The inclusion of the algal sequences and the use of Volvox as a root appear valid, as they are not recovered on especially long branches, and Physcomitrella and Selaginella are appropriately placed on the first branches of each tree. In the maximum likelihood tree, we recovered 10 separate clades of monocot ABCBs, as well as an apparent expansion of the ABCBs in several angiosperm species, including Medicago truncatula and Prunus persica (Figures 4A,B). Among the PopulusABCBs, only few were recovered in clear sister pairs. The tree found under dynamic homology for the ABCBs recovered almost identical groupings of basal land plant, monocot, and dicot ABCBs as those trees found using aligned sequences, but the relationships among these clades or groups differed. For example, a clade containing OsABCB12 and Mes026648 (top of Figure 4B) was recovered as a paraphyletic grade immediately after the algal sequences in the dynamic homology tree (Figure A3A in Appendix).

Tissue-specific and IAA-induced expression of PtaPINs, PtaAUX/LAXs, and PtaABCBs

Expression of all PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB gene family members in P. tremula × alba was characterized for whole plantlets, roots, and stem tissues from several developmental stages through qRT-PCR (Figures 68). Whole in vitro-grown plantlets that were old enough to have initiated secondary growth were used as an initial screen and showed that over half of the PtaPINs and PtaAUX/LAX genes were expressed at above-trace levels, while only four or five PtaABCBs showed above-trace expression. Internodes that spanned the region of secondary growth initiation in greenhouse-grown plants should reflect combined expression in several distinct tissues, including cortex, vascular cambium, developing secondary vasculature, and primary xylem parenchyma. Here PtaPIN1, 6, and PtaABCB1.1 show high expression levels, with lower levels of PtaPIN7, 11, 15, 16, and PtaABCB7 (Figures 6 and 8). Developing secondary xylem removed from beneath the bark in 6-month-old greenhouse-grown trees showed high expression of PtaPIN1 and PtaABCB1.1, with lower levels of PtaABCB7. Roots showed low expression levels of most genes, which may simply reflect the fact that the roots collected were relatively mature and composed largely of parenchyma, rather than a concentration of actively growing root tips. PtaAUX/LAX genes were expressed at relatively uniform levels across all tissues and developmental stages (Figure 7), although expression levels were highest for developing xylem, where very high levels of PtaAUX2 were detected.

In order to perform an expression screen (RT-PCR) with higher spatial resolution in developing woody stems, basal internodes approximately 100 nodes and 2.5 m down from the stem apex of 6-month-old Populus were freeze-sectioned and tissue collected from the cortex, secondary phloem, cambial zone (restricted to cambial initials and mother/daughter cells), and secondary xylem. Developing secondary xylem and phloem were discarded in order to obtain the most pure collections of tissues possible. Given that, the number of members of all families that are expressed in each tissue is striking (Figures 58). Only PtaPIN9, 10, and 12 and PtaABCB5 and 10 were not expressed in any tissue (Figures 6 and 8), and although some of the transcripts detected through RT-PCR are likely expressed at very low levels, it is clear that expression of many previously undescribed members (e.g., PtaPIN6, 7, 15, and 16 and PtaABCB1.1 and 7) is widespread in Populus stems. Also striking is the fact that several members of all three transport families are expressed in mature secondary xylem, from which all mRNA is derived from living ray parenchyma cells.

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Because a positive feedback mechanism is fundamental to the canalization of auxin flow during vascular development, we also tested the auxin response of members of the PtaPIN, PtaAUX/LAX, and PtaABCB gene families in roots and internodes from 2-month-old plants, following exogenous IAA application, via qRT–PCR. PtaPIN1, 2, and 7 and PtaAUX5 and 6 were strongly upregulated in developing internodes, with PtaPIN15 and 16 showing a more moderate increase (Figure 9). In contrast, PtaPIN3 and 8 were strongly upregulated in roots, with PtaAUX6 and PtaABCB7 showing a lower expression level.

Figure 9

Discussion

The array of putative auxin transporters in Populus reflects both pre-existing diversity and expansion due to genomic and segmental duplications

There are twice as many members of the PIN and AUX/LAX gene families in Populus as there are in Arabidopsis and both families show a number of clear pairs based on coding sequence (e.g., PtrPIN4/5, PtrAUX3/4; Figures 2 and 3). With no clear evidence for any tandem duplication in the PIN and AUX/LAX gene families, it is possible that all gene copies were retained following the “salicoid” genome duplication (Tuskan et al., 2006). Although the functional role of these proteins has not been demonstrated in Populus, given the conserved protein structure and known specificity for IAA for most PINs in Arabidopsis (and to a lesser extent, AUX/LAX proteins), it seems likely that they have retained a function in auxin transport. To what extent new PINs have developed specialized roles in PAT in Populus is not known and the added redundancy for such an important developmental mechanism may be beneficial enough to warrant retention. Indeed, redundancy in Arabidopsis allows single PIN mutants to complete embryogenesis, whereas quadruple mutants are required before severe defects are observed (Benková et al., 2003; Friml et al., 2003). At the same time it is interesting to note that there are clear differences in expression among presumed paralogs. For instance, PtaPIN1 is expressed at much higher levels than PtaPIN7 in internodes and developing xylem. Predictions about PIN function in Populus may also be informed by structural comparisons with Arabidopsis. The “long” PINs in Arabidopsis are localized to the plasma membrane and function in PAT, whereas those with shorter structure are found in the ER (Mravec et al., 2009; Friml and Jones, 2010). PtrPIN1–3 and PtrPIN6–9 are all classified as “long” PINs (Table A3 in Appendix), but it is not known whether similar localization patterns exist in Populus.

In contrast to the PIN and AUX/LAX gene families, the number of ABCBs in Populus is not expanded relative to Arabidopsis (both species include about 20 members; Table A2 in Appendix) and only a few appear as closely related gene pairs. This is perhaps not surprising given that this gene family has a much deeper history and that ABCB proteins transport a number of substrates in addition to IAA. There also appears to be expansion in a number of angiosperms included in our phylogeny, such as Z. mays, M. truncatula, P. persica, and Arabidopsis (Figure 4). Although there has been retention of ABCB copies from both tandem duplication and whole genome duplication events in Populus, there also appears to have been loss. Much functional work is needed on Populus ABCB genes and proteins before any role in PAT can be ascribed.

Candidate ABCBs for IAA transport function in Populus are suggested by phylogenetic placement and protein structure prediction

ATP-binding cassette proteins constitute a very large superfamily that has representatives across the bacteria, plant, and animal kingdoms (Jasinski et al., 2003; Verrier et al., 2008) and, as a group, are able to transport a wide array of different molecules (Geisler et al., 2005; Bandyopadhyay et al., 2007). Among the ABCs, the subclass B includes proteins that are able to bind and transport auxin across the plasma membrane in Arabidopsis, whereas other members transport other substrates in addition to IAA (e.g., AtABCB14 functions primarily as a malate transporter (Lee et al., 2008)). There has been no functional characterization of the ABCBs in Populus to date and given the large size of the family and the likely role of one or more members in IAA transport, we sought to identify candidate PtrABCBs with this function. Our phylogenetic analysis shows that the coding sequences of PtrABCB1.1, PtrABCB1.2, and PtrABCB19 cluster together with AtABCB1 and AtABCB19 respectively, both of which are known IAA transporters with high specificity for IAA (Zazímalová et al., 2010). Interestingly, although 10 of the 20 PtaABCBs are predicted to have one or more IAA binding sites based on tertiary structure, both PtrABCB1 and PtrABCB19 have only one clearly defined binding pocket for IAA. All but one of the remaining ABCBs with putative IAA binding sites (PtrABCB2, PtrABCB5, PtrABCB6, PtrABCB8, PtrABCB11, PtrABCB14) cluster together in the same clade, which includes AtABCB4, a gene coding codes for another membrane protein capable of IAA transport (Terasaka et al., 2005; Kubeš et al., 2011). Similarly, PtrABCB16 occurs in the same clade as AtABCB13 and AtABCB14, where AtABCB14 has been recently determined as responsible for auxin transport in the inflorescence stem of Arabidopsis (Kaneda et al., 2011).

We found PtrABCB1.1 to be highly expressed in most Populus tissues, particularly in internodes and developing xylem. PtrABCB7 was also expressed in these same tissues and was strongly upregulated in response to IAA, although most notably in roots. However, although coding sequence similarity places PtrABCB7 as a close relative of a presumed IAA transporter in Arabidopsis (AtABCB15; Kaneda et al., 2011), the protein was not predicted to contain an IAA binding site. We suggest therefore that PtrABCB1.1 and its nearly identical paralog PtrABCB1.2 are the most logical candidates for initial functional characterization, both in heterologous expression systems (e.g., Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and in planta, given their phylogenetic placement relative to AtABCB1 and predicted IAA binding sites. It is interesting to note that in contrast to AtABCB1 (Geisler et al., 2005), we did not find PtaABCB1.1 to be upregulated by exogenous IAA treatment. Lastly, we did not observe strong expression of PtaABCB19 in any Populus tissues nor was it upregulated by IAA. The expression of its presumed ortholog in Arabidopsis, AtABCB19, is induced by IAA treatments (Noh et al., 2001) and the protein often co-localizes with AtPIN1 (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2007), suggesting that the relationship of these two proteins may have changed. Clearly there is much to be learned about the role of these ABCBs in IAA transport in Populus.

Auxin transporters in Populus stem development

That auxin regulates vascular development in woody plants is clear, but our understanding of the genetic mechanisms and the role of specific proteins in basipetal transport is limited. The expression of PttPIN1–3 and PttLAX1–3 has already been characterized in detail across the developing stem tissues of P. tremula × tremuloides (Schrader et al., 2003), but our results suggest that a far greater number of putative transporters are expressed in young internodes where cambial growth is being initiated. In particular, PtaPIN1, PtaPIN6, and PtaABCB1.1 are highly expressed in internodes, a complex tissue that includes primary xylem parenchyma, primary phloem, cortex, and a nascent vascular cambium. In developing xylem, PtaPIN1, PtaAUX2, and PtaABCB1.1 are highly expressed, with the latter likely to function in auxin transport given its protein sequence similarity to AtABCB1. Similarly, several previously uncharacterized transporters are strongly upregulated by auxin, including PtaPIN8, PtaAUX6, and PtaABCB7 in roots and PtaPIN7, PtaPIN15, PtaPIN16, PtaAUX5, and PtaAUX6 in internodes. Given the retention of copies of auxin transporters following duplication events, there is likely to be both redundancy and neo-functionalization for PAT proteins in Populus.

The vascular cambium and the secondary xylem and phloem that it produces are often viewed as distinct from primary growth, but it is important to remember that vascular development forms a continuum between stem and leaf (Spicer and Groover, 2010). We know a great deal about the role of PAT in venation patterning in leaves of Arabidopsis (Scarpella et al., 2006). Here, AtPIN1 directs auxin flow up through the epidermis toward a convergence point, from where it is channeled down through the center of a developing leaf primordium, establishing the location of the first central vascular bundle. This vascular bundle differentiates from a strand of procambium that is continuous with the vascular cambium below, such that the basipetal transport of auxin out of developing primordia is likely continuous with the basipetal stream moving down through the cambium (Lachaud and Bonnemain, 1984; Uggla et al., 1998; Kramer et al., 2008). Based on a combination of our results and published work in both Arabidopsis and Populus, we suggest that PtaPIN1, PtaAUX2, and PtaABCB1.1 are the best initial candidates for the maintenance of PAT in the cambial zone, although additional transporters are very likely involved. Given the slow time course and laborious nature of transformation in woody plants, our hope is that this work will provide a starting point for work in planta by identifying candidate IAA transporters involved in woody stem development. Functional studies, transport assays and protein localization are all needed to resolve the action of specific transporters in shaping the distribution of auxin across the cambial zone.

Finally, it is interesting to note that several members of the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB gene families are expressed in the mature xylem. Although the bulk of this tissue is dead (e.g., vessels and fibers), ray parenchyma cells remain alive for many years (Spicer and Holbrook, 2007) and serve as a route of transport between xylem and phloem (Van Bel, 1990). In particular, PtaPIN1, PtaAUX2, PtaAUX3, PtaAUX4 and PtaABCB1, PtaABCB7, PtaABCB20 were found to be expressed in these cells. In addition to their role in carbohydrate transport and storage, xylem parenchyma cells are able to exchange solutes with the transpiration stream and function in wound response. What is puzzling however is that these cells are symplasmically connected, at least in the radial direction, whereas PAT requires transport across a membrane. Furthermore, there is no evidence for free IAA in mature xylem (Uggla et al., 1996; Tuominen et al., 1997). Although conjugated forms of IAA are transported in the phloem (Baker, 2000) no studies to date have looked for conjugated IAA in ray or axial parenchyma in secondary xylem. Given their role in wound response, some capacity for IAA transport (or even IAA synthesis) would not be surprising, but transport assays and protein localization are needed to clarify any potential role these cells might play in IAA transport.

The ABCB gene family diversified prior to the PIN and AUX/LAX families and prior to the diversification of land plants

It is clear from our phylogenetic analysis that the ABCB gene family existed before the diversification of land plants, whereas the PIN and AUX/LAX families arose within the land plant clade. This is supported by the fact that ABCB genes from a moss (P. patens) and a lycopod (S. moellendorffii) consistently occur nested within multiple, well-supported clades that also include higher plants (Figure 4; Figure A3 in Appendix). It also confirms previous work reconstructing the evolutionary history of this family (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2007; Krecek et al., 2009). In contrast, diversification of the PIN and AUX/LAX gene families occurred after the origin of land plants, as suggested by the well-supported and exclusively basal position of both Physcomitrella and SelaginellaPIN and AUX/LAX genes (Figures 2 and 3). There was already considerable diversity in the ABCB gene family at the time of the monocot/dicot divergence, dated at approximately 130–150 Myr ago (Wolfe et al., 1989; Chaw et al., 2004; Bell et al., 2010), as we recovered as many as 10 distinct ABCB gene clades that contain a clear monocot/dicot split with strong support. The picture is not as clear for the PIN and AUX/LAX genes due to weak support at some nodes, but there may have been five copies of the PIN and likely just two copies of the AUX/LAX genes at the time of the monocot/dicot divergence. It is not clear at this time whether all AUX/LAX genes in monocots descended from a single original copy, as suggested by the tree found using aligned sequences under parsimony, since monocot AUX/LAX genes were not recovered in a single clade in other trees (Figure 3).

In conclusion, we show that the deep history of the ABCB family of transporters coupled with the expansion of the PIN and AUX/LAX families following a genome duplication has led to a diverse array of over 40 putative auxin transport proteins in Populus. Given this large number and the inherent difficulties in working with a woody plant (e.g., long generation times, slow transformation process, difficult nucleic acid extraction), it is important to establish a comprehensive picture of gene expression profiles and predict their protein structures. By considering both evolutionary relationships and structural similarities to known auxin transporters, we can choose the most appropriate candidates for future study. One of the main goals in the short term should be to develop a set of tools for protein localization, including antibodies and protein fusions for stable plant transformation. Although technically difficult for trees, these findings should be coupled with functional studies with knockout mutants. Lastly, it will be important to determine the transport capacity and substrate specificity of target proteins of Populus by expressing them in heterologous systems such as S. pombe. We hope that this work provides a foundation on which to build an improved understanding of auxin transport in Populus, as knowing the role of specific transport proteins in secondary vascular development is likely key to enhanced utilization of woody plants.

Statements

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the laboratories of Noel M. Holbrook and Elena M. Kramer (Harvard University, OEB) for providing space and access to equipment, technical support, and for helpful discussion. The authors are also grateful to Angus S. Murphy and Wendy A. Peer (Purdue University) for helpful discussion of the manuscript; Serena Varotto and Cristian Forestan for sharing sequences and for helpful discussion. This work was supported by a Rowland Junior Fellowship awarded to Rachel Spicer from 2007 to 2010.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    BainbridgeK.Guyomarc’hS.BayerE.SwarupR.BennettM.MandelT.KuhlemeierC. (2008). Auxin influx carriers stabilize phyllotactic patterning. Genes Dev.22, 810823.10.1101/gad.462608

  • 2

    BakerD. A. (2000). Long-distance vascular transport of endogenous hormones in plants and their role in source: sink regulation. Isr. J. Plant Sci.48, 199203.10.1560/QA6D-YP8C-DP8G-AG6K

  • 3

    BandyopadhyayA.BlakesleeJ. J.LeeO. R.MravecJ.SauerM.TitapiwatanakunB.MakamS. N.BouchardR.GeislerM.MartinoiaE.FrimlJ.PeerW. A.MurphyA. S. (2007). Interactions of PIN and PGP auxin transport mechanisms. Biochem. Soc. Trans.35, 137141.10.1042/BST0350137

  • 4

    BanksJ. A.NishiyamaT.HasebeM.BowmanJ. L.GribskovM.DePamphilisC.AlbertV. A.AonoN.AoyamaT.AmbroseB. A.AshtonN. W.AxtellM. J.BarkerE.BarkerM. S.BennetzenJ. L.BonawitzN. D.ChappleC.ChengC.CorreaL. G.DacreM.DeBarryJ.DreyerI.EliasM.EngstromE. M.EstelleM.FengL.FinetC.FloydS. K.FrommerW. B.FujitaT.GramzowL.GutensohnM.HarholtJ.HattoriM.HeylA.HiraiT.HiwatashiY.IshikawaM.IwataM.KarolK. G.KoehlerB.KolukisaogluU.KuboM.KurataT.LalondeS.LiK.LiY.LittA.LyonsE.ManningG.MaruyamaT.MichaelT. P.MikamiK.MiyazakiS.MorinagaS.MurataT.Mueller-RoeberB.NelsonD. R.ObaraM.OguriY.OlmsteadR. G.OnoderaN.PetersenB. L.PilsB.PriggeM.RensingS. A.Riaño-PachónD. M.RobertsA. W.SatoY.SchellerH. V.SchulzB.SchulzC.ShakirovE. V.ShibagakiN.ShinoharaN.ShippenD. E.SørensenI.SotookaR.SugimotoN.SugitaM.SumikawaN.TanurdzicM.TheissenG.UlvskovP.WakazukiS.WengJ. K.WillatsW. W.WipfD.WolfP. G.YangL.ZimmerA. D.ZhuQ.MitrosT.HellstenU.LoquéD.OtillarR.SalamovA.SchmutzJ.ShapiroH.LindquistE.LucasS.RokhsarD.GrigorievI. V. (2011). The Selaginella genome identifies genetic changes associated with the evolution of vascular plants. Science332, 960963.10.1126/science.1203810

  • 5

    BellC. D.SoltisD. E.SoltisP. S. (2010). The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. Am. J. Bot.97, 12961303.10.3732/ajb.0900161

  • 6

    BenkováE.MichniewiczM.SauerM.TeichmannT.SeifertováD.JürgensG.FrimlJ. (2003). Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell115, 591602.10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00924-3

  • 7

    BennettM. J.MarchantA.GreenH. G.MayS. T.WardS. P.MillnerP. A.WalkerA. R.SchulzB.FeldmannK. A. (1996). Arabidopsis AUX1 gene: a permease-like regulator of root gravitropism. Science273, 948950.10.1126/science.273.5277.948

  • 8

    BjörklundS.AnttiH.UddestrandI.MoritzT.SundbergB. (2007). Cross-talk between gibberellin and auxin in development of Populus wood: gibberellin stimulates polar auxin transport and has a common transcriptome with auxin. Plant J.52, 499511.10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03250.x

  • 9

    BrunnerA. M.YakovlevI. A.StraussS. H. (2004). Validating internal controls for quantitative plant gene expression studies. BMC Plant Biol.4, 14.10.1186/1471-2229-4-14

  • 10

    CarraroN.ForestanC.CanovaS.TraasJ.VarottoS. (2006). ZmPIN1a and ZmPIN1b encode two novel putative candidates for polar auxin transport and plant architecture determination of maize. Plant Physiol.142, 254264.10.1104/pp.106.080119

  • 11

    CastresanaJ. (2000). Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol.17, 540552.

  • 12

    ChawS.-M.ChangC.-C.ChenH.-L.LiW.-H. (2004). Dating the monocot-dicot divergence and the origin of core eudicots using whole chloroplast genomes. J. Mol. Evol.58, 424441.10.1007/s00239-003-2564-9

  • 13

    ChenR.HilsonP.SedbrookJ.RosenE.CasparT.MassonP. H. (1998). The Arabidopsis thaliana AGRAVITROPIC 1 gene encodes a component of the polar-auxin-transport efflux carrier. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.95, 1511215117.10.1073/pnas.95.11.6193

  • 14

    DolinskyT. J.CzodrowskiP.LiH.NielsenJ. E.JensenJ. H.KlebeG.BakerN. A. (2007). PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res.35, W522W525.10.1093/nar/gkm276

  • 15

    DolinskyT. J.NielsenJ. E.McCammonJ. A.BakerN. A. (2004). PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res.32, W665W667.10.1093/nar/gkh381

  • 16

    ForestanC.MedaS.VarottoS. (2010). ZmPIN1-mediated auxin transport is related to cellular differentiation during maize embryogenesis and endosperm development. Plant Physiol.152, 13731390.10.1104/pp.109.150193

  • 17

    FrimlJ.BenkováE.BlilouI.WisniewskaJ.HamannT.LjungK.WoodyS.SandbergG.ScheresB.JürgensG.PalmeK. (2002a). AtPIN4 mediates sink-driven auxin gradients and root patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell108, 661673.10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00656-6

  • 18

    FrimlJ.WisniewskaJ.BenkováE.MendgenK.PalmeK. (2002b). Lateral relocation of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis. Nature415, 806809.10.1038/415806a

  • 19

    FrimlJ.JonesA. R. (2010). Endoplasmic reticulum: the rising compartment in auxin biology. Plant Physiol.154, 458462.10.1104/pp.110.161380

  • 20

    FrimlJ.VietenA.SauerM.WeijersD.SchwarzH.HamannT.OffringaR.JürgensG. (2003). Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis. Nature426, 147153.10.1038/nature02085

  • 21

    GälweilerL.GuanC.MüllerA.WismanE.MendgenK.YephremovA.PalmeK. (1998). Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science282, 22262230.10.1126/science.282.5397.2226

  • 22

    GeislerM.BlakesleeJ. J.BouchardR.LeeO. R.VincenzettiV.BandyopadhyayA.TitapiwatanakunB.PeerW. A.BaillyA.RichardsE. L.EjendalK. F.SmithA. P.BarouxC.GrossniklausU.MüllerA.HrycynaC. A.DudlerR.MurphyA. S.MartinoiaE. (2005). Cellular efflux of auxin catalyzed by the Arabidopsis MDR/PGP transporter AtPGP1. Plant J.44, 179194.10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02519.x

  • 23

    GuoA.-Y.ZhuQ.-H.ChenX.LuoJ.-C. (2007). GSDS: a gene structure display server. Yi Chuan29, 10231026.10.1360/yc-007-1023

  • 24

    GutierrezL.MauriatM.GuéninS.PellouxJ.LefebvreJ.-F.LouvetR.RusterucciC.MoritzT.GuerineauF.BelliniC.Van WuytswinkelO. (2008). The lack of a systematic validation of reference genes: a serious pitfall undervalued in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J.6, 609618.10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00346.x

  • 25

    HellgrenJ. M.OlofssonK.PlantU.CentreS.SciencesA. (2004). Patterns of auxin distribution during gravitational induction of reaction wood in poplar and pine. Plant Physiol.135, 212220.10.1104/pp.104.038927

  • 26

    JasinskiM.DucosE.MartinoiaE.BoutryM. (2003). The ATP-binding cassette transporters: structure, function, and gene family comparison between. Plant Physiol.131, 11691177.10.1104/pp.102.014720

  • 27

    KanedaM.SchuetzM.LinB. S. P.ChanisC.HambergerB.WesternT. L.EhltingJ.SamuelsA. L. (2011). ABC transporters coordinately expressed during lignification of Arabidopsis stems include a set of ABCBs associated with auxin transport. J. Exp. Bot.62, 20632077.10.1093/jxb/erq416

  • 28

    KatekarG. F.GeisslerA. E. (1980). Auxin transport inhibitors. Plant Physiol.66, 11901195.10.1104/pp.66.6.1190

  • 29

    KatohK.AsimenosG.TohH. (2009). Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods Mol. Biol.537, 3964.10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_3

  • 30

    KnöllerA. S.BlakesleeJ. J.RichardsE. L.PeerW. A.MurphyA. S. (2010). Brachytic2/ZmABCB1 functions in IAA export from intercalary meristems. J. Exp. Bot.61, 36893696.10.1093/jxb/erq180

  • 31

    KramerE. M.DoritR. L.IrishV. F. (1998). Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics149, 765783.

  • 32

    KramerE. M.LewandowskiM.BeriS.BernardJ.BorkowskiM.BorkowskiM. H.BurchfieldL. A.MathisenB.NormanlyJ. (2008). Auxin gradients are associated with polarity changes in trees. Science320, 1610.10.1126/science.320.5879.1011b

  • 33

    KubešM.YangH.RichterG. L.ChengY.MlodzinskaE.WangX.BlakesleeJ. J.CarraroN.PetrášekJ.ZažímalováE.HoyerováK.PeerW. A.MurphyA. S. (2011). The Arabidopsis concentration-dependent influx/efflux transporter ABCB4 regulates cellular auxin levels in the root epidermis. Plant J. [Epub ahead of print].

  • 34

    KrecekP.SkupaP.LibusJ.NaramotoS.TejosR.FrimlJ.ZažímalováE. (2009). Protein family review The PIN-FORMED (PIN) protein family of auxin transporters. Genome Biol.10, 111.10.1186/gb-2009-10-12-249

  • 35

    LachaudS.BonnemainJ. L. (1984). Seasonal variations in the polar transport pathways and retention sites of [3H]indole-3-acetic acid in young branches of Fagus sylvatica L. Planta161, 207215.10.1007/BF00982914

  • 36

    LeeB. H. A.JohnstonR.YangY.GallavottiA.KojimaM.TravençoloB. A. N.CostaL. D. F.SakakibaraH.JacksonD. (2009). Studies of aberrant phyllotaxy1 mutants of maize indicate complex interactions between auxin and cytokinin signaling in the shoot apical meristem. Plant Physiol.150, 205216.10.1104/pp.109.137745

  • 37

    LeeM.ChoiY.BurlaB.KimY.-Y.JeonB.MaeshimaM.YooJ.-Y.MartinoiaE.LeeY. (2008). The ABC transporter AtABCB14 is a malate importer and modulates stomatal response to CO2. Nat. Cell Biol.10, 12171223.10.1038/ncb1710

  • 38

    LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods25, 402408.10.1006/meth.2001.1262

  • 39

    LjungK.BhaleraoR. P.SandbergG. (2001a). Sites and homeostatic control of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis during vegetative growth. Plant J.28, 465474.10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01173.x

  • 40

    LjungK.OstinA.LioussanneL.SandbergG. (2001b). Developmental regulation of indole-3-acetic acid turnover in Scots pine seedlings. Plant Physiol.125, 464475.10.1104/pp.125.1.464

  • 41

    LjungK.HullA. K.CelenzaJ.YamadaM.EstelleM.NormanlyJ. (2005). Sites and regulation of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell17, 10901104.10.1105/tpc.104.029272

  • 42

    LomaxT.MudayG. K.RuberyP. H. (1995). Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology. Dordrecht: K. A. Publishers.

  • 43

    LuschnigC.GaxiolaR. A.GrisafiP.FinkG. R. (1998). EIR1, a root-specific protein involved in auxin transport, is required for gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev.12, 21752187.10.1101/gad.12.14.2175

  • 44

    MerchantS. S.ProchnikS. E.VallonO.HarrisE. H.KarpowiczS. J.WitmanG. B.TerryA.SalamovA.Fritz-LaylinL. K.Maréchal-DrouardL.MarshallW. F.QuL. H.NelsonD. R.SanderfootA. A.SpaldingM. H.KapitonovV. V.RenQ.FerrisP.LindquistE.ShapiroH.LucasS. M.GrimwoodJ.SchmutzJ.CardolP.CeruttiH.ChanfreauG.ChenC. L.CognatV.CroftM. T.DentR.DutcherS.FernándezE.FukuzawaH.González-BallesterD.González-HalphenD.HallmannA.HanikenneM.HipplerM.InwoodW.JabbariK.KalanonM.KurasR.LefebvreP. A.LemaireS. D.LobanovA. V.LohrM.ManuellA.MeierI.MetsL.MittagM.MittelmeierT.MoroneyJ. V.MoseleyJ.NapoliC.NedelcuA. M.NiyogiK.NovoselovS. V.PaulsenI. T.PazourG.PurtonS.RalJ. P.Riaño-PachónD. M.RiekhofW.RymarquisL.SchrodaM.SternD.UmenJ.WillowsR.WilsonN.ZimmerS. L.AllmerJ.BalkJ.BisovaK.ChenC. J.EliasM.GendlerK.HauserC.LambM. R.LedfordH.LongJ. C.MinagawaJ.PageM. D.PanJ.PootakhamW.RojeS.RoseA.StahlbergE.TerauchiA. M.YangP.BallS.BowlerC.DieckmannC. L.GladyshevV. N.GreenP.JorgensenR.MayfieldS.Mueller-RoeberB.RajamaniS.SayreR. T.BroksteinP.DubchakI.GoodsteinD.HornickL.HuangY. W.JhaveriJ.LuoY.MartínezD.NgauW. C.OtillarB.PoliakovA.PorterA.SzajkowskiL.WernerG.ZhouK.GrigorievI. V.RokhsarD. S.GrossmanA. R. (2007). The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science318, 245250.10.1126/science.1143609

  • 45

    MillerM. A.PfeifferW.SchwartzT. (2010). “Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees,” in Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans.

  • 46

    MravecJ.SkupaP.BaillyA.HoyerováK.KrecekP.BielachA.PetrásekJ.ZhangJ.GaykovaV.StierhofY.-D.DobrevP. I.SchwarzerováK.RolcíkJ.SeifertováD.LuschnigC.BenkováE.ZazímalováE.GeislerM.FrimlJ. (2009). Subcellular homeostasis of phytohormone auxin is mediated by the ER-localized PIN5 transporter. Nature459, 11361140.10.1038/nature08066

  • 47

    MüllerA.GuanC.GälweilerL.TänzlerP.HuijserP.MarchantA.ParryG.BennettM.WismanE.PalmeK. (1998). AtPIN2 defines a locus of Arabidopsis for root gravitropism control. EMBO J.17, 69036911.10.1093/emboj/17.1.61

  • 48

    MultaniD. S.BriggsS. P.ChamberlinM. A.BlakesleeJ. J.MurphyA. S.JohalG. S. (2003). Loss of an MDR transporter in compact stalks of maize br2 and sorghum dw3 mutants. Science302, 8184.10.1126/science.1086072

  • 49

    NilssonJ.KarlbergA.AnttiH.Lopez-VernazaM.MellerowiczE.Perrot-RechenmannC.SandbergG.BhaleraoR. P. (2008). Dissecting the molecular basis of the regulation of wood formation by auxin in hybrid aspen. Plant Cell20, 843855.10.1105/tpc.107.055798

  • 50

    NohB.MurphyA. S.SpaldingE. P. (2001). Multidrug resistance-like genes of Arabidopsis required for auxin transport and auxin-mediated development. Plant Cell13, 24412454.10.1105/tpc.13.11.2441

  • 51

    OkadaK.UedaJ.KomakiM. K.BellC. J.ShimuraY. (1991). Requirement of the auxin polar transport system in early stages of Arabidopsis floral bud formation. Plant Cell3, 677.10.1105/tpc.3.7.677

  • 52

    PetrásekJ.FrimlJ. (2009). Auxin transport routes in plant development. Development136, 26752688.10.1242/dev.030353

  • 53

    PfafflM. W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res.29, e45.10.1093/nar/29.9.e45

  • 54

    ProchnikS. E.UmenJ.NedelcuA. M.HallmannA.MillerS. M.NishiiI.FerrisP.KuoA.MitrosT.Fritz-LaylinL. K.HellstenU.ChapmanJ.SimakovO.RensingS. A.TerryA.PangilinanJ.KapitonovV.JurkaJ.SalamovA.ShapiroH.SchmutzJ.GrimwoodJ.LindquistE.LucasS.GrigorievI. V.SchmittR.KirkD.RokhsarD. S. (2010). Genomic analysis of organismal complexity in the multicellular green alga Volvox carteri. Science329, 223226.10.1126/science.1188800

  • 55

    ReaP. A. (2007). Plant ATP-binding cassette transporters. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.58, 347375.10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105406

  • 56

    RensingS. A.LangD.ZimmerA. D.TerryA.SalamovA.ShapiroH.NishiyamaT.PerroudP.-F.LindquistE. A.KamisugiY.TanahashiT.SakakibaraK.FujitaT.OishiK.Shin-IT.KurokiY.ToyodaA.SuzukiY.HashimotoS.YamaguchiK.SuganoS.KoharaY.FujiyamaA.AnterolaA.AokiS.AshtonN.BarbazukW. B.BarkerE.BennetzenJ. L.BlankenshipR.ChoS. H.DutcherS. K.EstelleM.FawcettJ. A.GundlachH.HanadaK.HeylA.HicksK. A.HughesJ.LohrM.MayerK.MelkozernovA.MurataT.NelsonD. R.PilsB.PriggeM.ReissB.RennerT.RombautsS.RushtonP. J.SanderfootA.SchweenG.ShiuS. H.StueberK.TheodoulouF. L.TuH.Van de PeerY.VerrierP. J.WatersE.WoodA.YangL.CoveD.CumingA. C.HasebeM.LucasS.MishlerB. D.ReskiR.GrigorievI. V.QuatranoR. S.BooreJ. L. (2008). The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science319, 6469.10.1126/science.1150646

  • 57

    Sanchez-FernandezR.DaviesT. G.ColemanJ. O.ReaP. A. (2001). The Arabidopsis thaliana ABC protein superfamily, a complete inventory. J. Biol. Chem.276, 3023130244.10.1074/jbc.M103104200

  • 58

    SauerM.BallaJ.LuschnigC.WisniewskaJ.ReinöhlV.FrimlJ.BenkováE. (2006). Canalization of auxin flow by Aux/IAA-ARF-dependent feedback regulation of PIN polarity. Genes Dev.20, 29022911.10.1101/gad.390806

  • 59

    ScarpellaE.MarcosD.FrimlJ.BerlethT. (2006). Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport. Genes Dev.20, 10151027.10.1101/gad.1402406

  • 60

    SchraderJ.BabaK.MayS. T.PalmeK.BennettM.BhaleraoR. P.SandbergG. (2003). Polar auxin transport in the wood-forming tissues of hybrid aspen is under simultaneous control of developmental and environmental signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.100, 1009610101.10.1073/pnas.1633693100

  • 61

    SchraderJ.MoyleR.BhaleraoR.HertzbergM.LundebergJ.NilssonP.BhaleraoR. P. (2004). Cambial meristem dormancy in trees involves extensive remodelling of the transcriptome. Plant J.40, 173187.10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02199.x

  • 62

    SecchiF.MacIverB.ZeidelM. L.ZwienieckiM. A. (2009). Functional analysis of putative genes encoding the PIP2 water channel subfamily in Populus trichocarpa. Tree Physiol.29, 14671477.10.1093/treephys/tpp060

  • 63

    ShenC.BaiY.WangS.ZhangS.WuY.ChenM.JiangD.QiY. (2010). Expression profile of PIN, AUX/LAX and PGP auxin transporter gene families in Sorghum bicolor under phytohormone and abiotic stress. FEBS J.277, 29542969.10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07706.x

  • 64

    SidlerM.HassaP.HasanS.RingliC.DudlerR. (1998). Involvement of an ABC transporter in a developmental pathway regulating hypocotyl cell elongation in the light. Plant Cell10, 16231636.10.2307/3870761

  • 65

    SpicerR.GrooverA. (2010). Evolution of development of vascular cambia and secondary growth. New Phytol.186, 577592.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03236.x

  • 66

    SpicerR.HolbrookN. M. (2007). Parenchyma cell respiration and survival in secondary xylem: does metabolic activity decline with cell age?Plant Cell Environ.30, 934943.10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01677.x

  • 67

    StamatakisA.HooverP.RougemontJ. (2008). A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst. Biol.57, 758771.10.1080/10635150802429642

  • 68

    SussmanM. R.GoldsmithM. H. M. (1981). The action of specific inhibitors of auxin transport on uptake of auxin and binding of N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid to a membrane site in maize coleoptiles. Planta1318.10.1007/BF00384978

  • 69

    SwarupK.BenkováE.SwarupR.CasimiroI.PéretB.YangY.ParryG.NielsenE.De SmetI.VannesteS.LevesqueM. P.CarrierD.JamesN.CalvoV.LjungK.KramerE.RobertsR.GrahamN.MarillonnetS.PatelK.JonesJ. D.TaylorC. G.SchachtmanD. P.MayS.SandbergG.BenfeyP.FrimlJ.KerrI.BeeckmanT.LaplazeL.BennettM. J. (2008). The auxin influx carrier LAX3 promotes lateral root emergence. Nat. Cell Biol.10, 946954.10.1038/ncb1754

  • 70

    SwarupR.FrimlJ.MarchantA.LjungK.SandbergG.PalmeK.BennettM. (2001). Localization of the auxin permease AUX1 suggests two functionally distinct hormone transport pathways operate in the Arabidopsis root apex. Genes Dev.15, 26482653.10.1101/gad.210501

  • 71

    SwarupR.KramerE. M.PerryP.KnoxK.LeyserH. M. O.HaseloffJ.BeemsterG. T. S.BhaleraoR.BennettM. J. (2005). Root gravitropism requires lateral root cap and epidermal cells for transport and response to a mobile auxin signal. Nat. Cell Biol.7, 10571065.10.1038/ncb1316

  • 72

    TalaveraG.CastresanaJ. (2007). Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst. Biol.56, 564577.10.1080/10635150701472164

  • 73

    TerasakaK.BlakesleeJ. J.TitapiwatanakunB.PeerW. A.BandyopadhyayA.MakamS. N.LeeR.RichardsE. L.MurphyA. S.SatoF.YazakiK. (2005). PGP4, an ATP binding cassette P-glycoprotein, catalyzes auxin transport in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant Cell17, 29222939.10.1105/tpc.105.035816

  • 74

    TitapiwatanakunB.MurphyA. S. (2009). Post-transcriptional regulation of auxin transport proteins: cellular trafficking, protein phosphorylation, protein maturation, ubiquitination, and membrane composition. J. Exp. Bot.60, 10931107.10.1093/jxb/ern240

  • 75

    TuominenH.PuechL.FinkS.SundbergB. (1997). A radial concentration gradient of indole-3-acetic acid is related to secondary xylem development in hybrid aspen. Plant Physiol.115, 577585.

  • 76

    TuskanG. A.DifazioS.JanssonS.BohlmannJ.GrigorievI.HellstenU.PutnamN.RalphS.RombautsS.SalamovA.ScheinJ.SterckL.AertsA.BhaleraoR. R.BhaleraoR. P.BlaudezD.BoerjanW.BrunA.BrunnerA.BusovV.CampbellM.CarlsonJ.ChalotM.ChapmanJ.ChenG. L.CooperD.CoutinhoP. M.CouturierJ.CovertS.CronkQ.CunninghamR.DavisJ.DegroeveS.DéjardinA.DepamphilisC.DetterJ.DirksB.DubchakI.DuplessisS.EhltingJ.EllisB.GendlerK.GoodsteinD.GribskovM.GrimwoodJ.GrooverA.GunterL.HambergerB.HeinzeB.HelariuttaY.HenrissatB.HolliganD.HoltR.HuangW.Islam-FaridiN.JonesS.Jones-RhoadesM.JorgensenR.JoshiC.KangasjärviJ.KarlssonJ.KelleherC.KirkpatrickR.KirstM.KohlerA.KalluriU.LarimerF.Leebens-MackJ.LepléJ. C.LocascioP.LouY.LucasS.MartinF.MontaniniB.NapoliC.NelsonD. R.NelsonC.NieminenK.NilssonO.PeredaV.PeterG.PhilippeR.PilateG.PoliakovA.RazumovskayaJ.RichardsonP.RinaldiC.RitlandK.RouzéP.RyaboyD.SchmutzJ.SchraderJ.SegermanB.ShinH.SiddiquiA.SterkyF.TerryA.TsaiC. J.UberbacherE.UnnebergP.VahalaJ.WallK.WesslerS.YangG.YinT.DouglasC.MarraM.SandbergG.Van de PeerY.RokhsarD. (2006). The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science313, 15961604.10.1126/science.1128691

  • 77

    UgglaC.MellerowiczE.SundbergB. (1998). Indole-3-acetic acid controls cambial growth in scots pine by positional signaling. Plant Physiol.117, 113121.10.1104/pp.117.1.113

  • 78

    UgglaC.MoritzT.SandbergG.SundbergB. (1996). Auxin as a positional signal in pattern formation in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.93, 92829286.10.1073/pnas.93.17.9282

  • 79

    UtsunoK.ShikanaiT.YamadaY.HashimotoT. (1998). Agr, an Agravitropic locus of Arabidopsis thaliana, encodes a novel membrane-protein family member. Plant Cell Physiol.39, 11111118.

  • 80

    Van BelA. J. E. (1990). Xylem-phloem exchange via the rays: the undervalued route of transport. J. Exp. Bot.41, 631644.10.1093/jxb/41.6.631

  • 81

    VandesompeleJ.De PreterK.PattynF.PoppeB.Van RoyN.De PaepeA.SpelemanF. (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol.3, RESEARCH0034.10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034

  • 82

    VarónA.VinhL. S.WheelerW. C. (2009). POY version 4: phylogenetic analysis using dynamic homologies. Cladistics26, 7285.10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00282.x

  • 83

    VernouxT.BrunoudG.FarcotE.MorinV.Van den DaeleH.LegrandJ.OlivaM.DasP.LarrieuA.WellsD.GuédonY.ArmitageL.PicardF.Guyomarc’hS.CellierC.ParryG.KoumproglouR.DoonanJ. H.EstelleM.GodinC.KepinskiS.BennettM.De VeylderL.TraasJ. (2011). The auxin signalling network translates dynamic input into robust patterning at the shoot apex. Mol. Syst. Biol.7, 508.10.1038/msb.2011.39

  • 84

    VerrierP. J.BirdD.BurlaB.DassaE.ForestierC.GeislerM.KleinM.KolukisaogluU.LeeY.MartinoiaE.MurphyA.ReaP. A.SamuelsL.SchulzB.SpaldingE. J.YazakiK.TheodoulouF. L. (2008). Plant ABC proteins – a unified nomenclature and updated inventory. Trends Plant Sci.13, 151159.10.1016/j.tplants.2008.02.001

  • 85

    VietenA.VannesteS.WisniewskaJ.BenkováE.BenjaminsR.BeeckmanT.LuschnigC.FrimlJ. (2005). Functional redundancy of PIN proteins is accompanied by auxin-dependent cross-regulation of PIN expression. Development132, 45214531.10.1242/dev.02027

  • 86

    WangJ.-R.HuH.WangG.-H.LiJ.ChenJ.-Y.WuP. (2009). Expression of PIN genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.): tissue specificity and regulation by hormones. Mol. Plant2, 823831.10.1093/mp/ssn088

  • 87

    WheelerW. (1996). Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics?Cladistics12, 19.10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00189.x

  • 88

    WiedersteinM.SipplM. J. (2007). ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res.35, W407W410.10.1093/nar/gkm290

  • 89

    WolfeK. H.GouyM.YangY. W.SharpP. M.LiW. H. (1989). Date of the monocot-dicot divergence estimated from chloroplast DNA sequence data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.86, 62016205.10.1073/pnas.86.16.6201

  • 90

    WuG.LewisD. R.SpaldingE. P. (2007). Mutations in Arabidopsis multidrug resistance-like ABC transporters separate the roles of acropetal and basipetal auxin transport in lateral root development. Plant Cell19, 18261837.10.1105/tpc.106.048777

  • 91

    WuX.McSteenP. (2007). The role of auxin transport during inflorescence development in maize (Zea mays, Poaceae). Am. J. Bot.94, 17451755.10.3732/ajb.94.11.1745

  • 92

    YangH.MurphyA. S. (2009). Functional expression and characterization of Arabidopsis ABCB, AUX 1 and PIN auxin transporters in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Plant J.59, 179191.10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03856.x

  • 93

    YangY.HammesU. Z.TaylorC. G.SchachtmanD. P.NielsenE. (2006). High-affinity auxin transport by the AUX1 influx carrier protein. Curr. Biol.16, 11231127.10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.029

  • 94

    YemmA.MayS.WilliamsL.MillnerP.TsurumiS.MooreI.NapierR.KerrI. D.BennettM. J. (2004). Structure-function analysis of the presumptive Arabidopsis auxin permease AUX1. Plant Cell16, 30693083.10.1105/tpc.104.024737

  • 95

    ZazímalováE.MurphyA. S.YangH.HoyerováK.HosekP. (2010). Auxin transporters – why so many?Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.2, 114.10.1101/cshperspect.a001552

Appendix

Figure A1

Figure A2

Figure A3

Table A1

SpeciesAbbreviation
Aquilegia caeruleaAco
Arabidopsis thalianaAt
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCre
Eucalyptus grandisEgr
Manihot esculentaMes
Medicago truncatulaMtr
Oryza sativaOs
Physcomitrella patensPp
Populus tomentosaPto
Populus tremula × tremuloidesPtt
Populus trichocarpaPtr
Prunus persicaPpe
Ricinus communisRc
Selaginella moellendorffiiSm
Sorghum bicolorSb
Vitis viniferaVv
Volvox carteriVc
Zea maysZm

List of all species with their abbreviated names used in the present work.

Table A2

GenesJGI v1.1 gene modelJGI v1.1 locus
PtrPIN1estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_XV0366LG_XV:3955456–3958939
PtrPIN2estExt_Genewise1_v1.C_LG_XVI1213LG_XVI:2023747–2028247
PtrPIN3gw1.X.6584.1LG_X:11493441–11496545
PtrPIN4estExt_fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_V0399LG_V:12604974–12610191
PtrPIN5fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_II000334LG_II:4970467–4976705
PtrPIN6fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_VIII000556LG_VIII:8394273–8397294
PtrPIN7estExt_Genewise1_v1.C_LG_XII1068LG_XII:3820572–3824595
PtrPIN8eugene3.00060333LG_VI:2296469–2299715
PtrPIN9fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_XVIII000434LG_XVIII:12913539–12916356
PtrPIN10fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_I000524LG_I:12290101–12293363
PtrPIN11estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_870067scaffold_87:1004073–1006598
PtrPIN12fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_XIX000547LG_XIX:6900262–6903432
PtrPIN13fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_IV001142LG_IV:12489496–12491318
PtrPIN14gw1.XVII.929.1LG_XVII:3836316–3838259
PtrPIN15fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_XIV000875LG_XIV:7307054–7309154
PtrPIN16gw1.5147.2.1scaffold_5147:1–1679
PtrAUX1/LAX5grail3.0023028402LG_VI:6769035–6772003
PtrAUX2/LAX1eugene3.00161081LG_XVI:10707443–10710997
PtrAUX3/LAX2estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_X1704LG_X:17003105–17007090
PtrAUX4/LAX6estExt_Genewise1_v1.C_LG_VIII1679LG_VIII:3795803–3800287
PtrAUX5/LAX7estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_IV1437LG_IV:15662320–15666183
PtrAUX6/LAX3grail3.0001031001LG_IX:2231536–2235747
PtrAUX7/LAX8estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_V0933LG_V:11098424–11101148
PtrAUX8/LAX4grail3.0003074001LG_II:6104679–6107343
PtrABCB1.1gw1.28.733.1scaffold_28:2297969–2304256
PtrABCB1.2fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_XVI000833LG_XVI:7805788–7812322
PtrABCB2estExt_Genewise1_v1.C_LG_II3719LG_II:16940658–16946357
PtrABCB3eugene3.00130846scaffold_1: 44776038–44781535
PtrABCB4fgenesh4_pg.C_scaffold_204000026scaffold_204:388201–394437
PtrABCB5gw1.X.3657.1LG_X:276730–282241
PtrABCB6estExt_fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_X0835LG_X:18271669–18278875
PtrABCB7gw1.XVII.765.1LG_XVII:3190614–3196509
PtrABCB8estExt_fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_II0929LG_II:16965413–16970969
PtrABCB9fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_XVII000406LG_XVII:4919010–4924173
PtrABCB10eugene3.00140575LG_XIV:4755266–4761017
PtrABCB11eugene3.00140576LG_XIV:4765985–4771483
PtrABCB12gw1.XVIII.2596.1LG_XVIII:8860516–8866795
PtrABCB13eugene3.00140578LG_XIV:4778008–4781195
PtrABCB14estExt_fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_XIV0249LG_XIV:4781910–4787506
PtrABCB15fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_XV000001LG_XV:12903–18128
PtrABCB16fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_II000094LG_II:1130589–1135712
PtrABCB17eugene3.01580034scaffold_158:318976–324742
PtrABCB18fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_VIII000415LG_VIII:2748354–2755879
PtrABCB19estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_XVII0355LG_XVII:4160851–4168120
PtrABCB20fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_XI000351scaffold_11:16,395,988.0.16,402,087
GenesPhytozome v.7.0 locusGenBank accesion numberChrom.Closest similar sequence
PtrPIN1POPTR_0015s04570XM_002322068chr.15PtrPIN7
PtrPIN2POPTR_0016s03450XM_002322578chr.16PtrPIN8
PtrPIN3POPTR_0010s12320XM_002314774chr.10PtrPIN6
PtrPIN4POPTR_0005s20990XM_002306642chr.5PtrPIN5
PtrPIN5POPTR_0002s07310XM_002302160chr.2PtrPIN4
PtrPIN6POPTR_0008s12830XM_002312400chr.8PtrPIN3
PtrPIN7POPTR_0012s04470XM_002317838chr.12PtrPIN1
PtrPIN8POPTR_0006s03540XM_002307930chr.6PtrPIN2
PtrPIN9POPTR_0018s13610XM_002324641chr.18No clear match
PtrPIN10POPTR_0001s21230XM_002298168chr.1No clear match
PtrPIN11POPTR_0013s08510XM_002328968chr.13PtrPIN12
PtrPIN12POPTR_0019s07990XM_002325430chr.19PtrPIN11
PtrPIN13POPTR_0004s12310XM_002305335chr.4PtrPIN14
PtrPIN14POPTR_0017s11440NC_008483chr.17PtrPIN13
PtrPIN15POPTR_0014s14390aXM_002320399chr.14No clear match
PtrPIN16POPTR_0014s14390aXM_002336619chr.2No clear match
PtrAUX1/LAX5POPTR_0006s09940XM_002309092chr.6PtrAUX2/LAX1
PtrAUX2/LAX1POPTR_0016s12100XM_002322933chr.16PtrAUX1/LAX5
PtrAUX3/LAX2POPTR_0010s19840XM_002316190chr.10PtrAUX4/LAX6
PtrAUX4/LAX6POPTR_0008s06630XM_002311172chr.8PtrAUX3/LAX2
PtrAUX5/LAX7POPTR_0004s17860XM_002306139chr.4PtrAUX6/LAX3
PtrAUX6/LAX3POPTR_0009s13470XM_002312937chr.9PtrAUX5/LAX7
PtrAUX7/LAX8POPTR_0005s16020XM_002306579chr.5PtrAUX8/LAX4
PtrAUX8/LAX4POPTR_0002s08750XM_002302217chr.2PtrAUX7/LAX8
PtrABCB1.1POPTR_0006s12590XM_002323449chr.6PtrABCB1.2
PtrABCB1.2POPTR_0016s09680XM_002519442chr.16PtrABCB1.1
PtrABCB2POPTR_0002s18860XM_002301511chr.2PtrABCB10
PtrABCB11
PtrABCB13
PtrABCB14
PtrABCB3POPTR_0001s44320XM_002319243chr.1PtrABCB20
PtrABCB4POPTR_0001s34280XM_002331841chr.1No clear match
PtrABCB5POPTR_0010s00540XM_002314297chr.10No clear match
PtrABCB6POPTR_0010s21720XM_002316273chr.10PtrABCB18
PtrABCB7POPTR_0017s11030XM_002323983chr.17No clear match
PtrABCB8POPTR_0002s18850XM_002301514chr.2PtrABCB10
PtrABCB11
PtrABCB9POPTR_0017s12120XM_002323830chr.17POPTR_0004s12180
PtrABCB10POPTR_0014s10860XM_002320902chr.14PtrABCB2, PtrABCB8
PtrABCB11POPTR_0014s10870XM_002320903chr.14PtrABCB2, PtrABCB8
PtrABCB12POPTR_0018s09420XM_002324987chr.18No clear match
PtrABCB13POPTR_0014s10880.1XM_002320905chr.14PtrABCB2, PtrABCB8
PtrABCB14POPTR_0014s10880.2XM_002320906chr.14PtrABCB2, PtrABCB8
PtrABCB15POPTR_0015s00250XM_002321303chr.15POPTR_0012s00290c
POPTR_0012s00360b
POPTR_0012s00370c
PtrABCB16POPTR_0002s02110XM_002301925chr.2No clear match
PtrABCB17POPTR_0001s16560XM_002331169chr.1No clear match
PtrABCB18POPTR_0008s05020XM_002311108chr.8PtrABCB6
PtrABCB19POPTR_0017s11750XM_002323811chr.17No clear match
PtrABCB20POPTR_0011s13720XM_002316941chr.11PtrABCB3

List of putative auxin transport genes identified in the Populus trichocarpa genome.

Gene models, accession numbers, chromosome position, and the closest most similar match for each gene are reported.

^aThese genes are distinct in GenBank but they retrieve the same entry in the phytozome database (www.phytozome.org).

^bVery short protein classified as ATP-binding transporter.

^cUncharacterized conserved protein.

Table A3

GenelengthLengthnType
cds (bp)Protein (aa)TMHs
AtPIN1186962211Long
AtPIN2194464710Long
AtPIN3192364010Long
AtPIN4185161610Long
AtPIN5105635110Short
AtPIN6171357010Reduced
AtPIN7186061910Long
AtPIN8110436710Short
PtrPIN1184561410Long
PtrPIN2176758811Long
PtrPIN3190563410Long
PtrPIN413384469Reduced
PtrPIN511103698Reduced
PtrPIN6195065010Long
PtrPIN7183061010Long
PtrPIN8176458810Long
PtrPIN9190263410Long
PtrPIN10164454810Reduced
PtrPIN1110413479Short
PtrPIN12104134710Short
PtrPIN1310683568Short
PtrPIN1410713578Short
PtrPIN1511133718Short
PtrPIN169123046Short
PttPIN1184561410Long
PttPIN2176758810Long
PttPIN3192364010Long
PtoPIN118606199Long
AtAUX1145848511
AtLAX1146748911
AtLAX2145248411
AtLAX3141347111
PtrAUX1/LAX5144348111
PtrAUX2/LAX1143447811
PtrAUX3/LAX2142247411
PtrAUX4/LAX6141647211
PtrAUX5/LAX7147649211
PtrAUX6/LAX3147649211
PtrAUX7/LAX8139546511
PtrAUX8/LAX4139846611
PttLAX1143447710
PttLAX2142247311
PttLAX3147649111
PtoAUX1143447710
AtABCB13861128612
AtABCB23822127312
AtABCB33690122911
AtABCB4386112869
AtABCB5369312309
AtABCB64224140713
AtABCB73747124811
AtABCB83723124112
AtABCB9371112369
AtABCB103684122710
AtABCB11383712789
AtABCB12382212739
AtABCB133738124511
AtABCB143744124711
AtABCB153723124011
AtABCB16368712287
AtABCB17372312409
AtABCB18367812259
AtABCB193759125210
AtABCB204227140813
AtABCB21389112969
AtABCB22366612217
PtrABCB1.14074135712
PtrABCB1.23975132412
PtrABCB23687122810
PtrABCB3375612519
PtrABCB43768125510
PtrABCB5388212949
PtrABCB64194139812
PtrABCB73780126011
PtrABCB83828127611
PtrABCB9371712399
PtrABCB10386412879
PtrABCB11388212949
PtrABCB12369312308
PtrABCB13359711997
PtrABCB14388512949
PtrABCB153828127610
PtrABCB163660122011
PtrABCB174644154812
PtrABCB184197139912
PtrABCB193756125210
PtrABCB203516117110

Summary of the protein characteristics of the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB families of Populus trichocarpa, Populus tomentosa, Populus tremula× tremuloides, and Arabidopsis.

All proteins are classified according to their sequence length, number of predicted transmembrane helices, and length of the central hydrophilic loop (short, reduced, long).

Table A4

Phytozome database locus or GenBank accession numberAssigned name
ABCBs
ppa000359m.gPpe000359
ppa000340m.gPpe000340
ppa000269m.gPpe000269
ppa000313m.gPpe000313
ppa000316m.gPpe000316
ppa023953m.gPpe023953
ppa000315m.gPpe000315
ppa015302m.gPpe015302
ppa000363m.gPpe000363
ppa015387m.gPpe015387
ppa015389m.gPpe015389
ppa017251m.gPpe017251
ppa023915m.gPpe023915
ppa018252m.gPpe018252
ppa000312m.gPpe000312
ppa026713m.gPpe026713
ppa000338m.gPpe000338
ppa0208157m.gPpe020815
POPTR_0006s12590PtrABCB11
POPTR_0016s09680PtrABCB12
POPTR_0002s18860PtrABCB2
POPTR_0001s44320PtrABCB3
POPTR_0001s34280PtrABCB4
POPTR_0010s00540PtrABCB5
POPTR_0010s21720PtrABCB6
POPTR_0017s11030PtrABCB7
POPTR_0002s18850PtrABCB8
POPTR_0017s12120PtrABCB9
POPTR_0014s10860PtrABCB10
POPTR_0014s10870PtrABCB11
POPTR_0018s09420PtrABCB12
POPTR_0014s10880.1PtrABCB13
POPTR_0014s10880.2PtrABCB14
POPTR_0015s00250PtrABCB15
POPTR_0002s02110PtrABCB16
POPTR_0001s16560PtrABCB17
POPTR_0008s05020PtrABCB18
POPTR_0017s11750PtrABCB19
POPTR_0011s13720PtrABCB20
GRMZM2G315375_T01Zm2G315375-1
GRMZM2G085236_T01Zm2G085236-1
GRMZM2G085236_T02ZmG085236-2
GRMZM2G004748_T01ZmG004748-1
GRMZM2G119894_T01Zm2G119894-1
GRMZM2G119894_T03Zm2G119894-3
GRMZM2G086730_T01Zm2G086730
AC233882.1_FGT003ZmAC233882-1_FG003
GRMZM2G025860_T01Zm2G025860
GRMZM2G167658_T01Zm2G167658
GRMZM2G111462_T01Zm2G111462
GRMZM2G085111_T02Zm2G085111-1
GRMZM2G333183_T01Zm2G333183
AC233939.1_FGT002ZmAC233939-1_FG002
GRMZM2G441722_T01Zm2G441722
Eucrg.J2160.1EgrJ02160
Eucgr.D00350.1EgrD00350
Eucgr.K00568.1EgrK00568-1
Eucgr.K02930.1EgrK02930
Eucgr.E00260.1EgrE00260
Eucgr.C01000.1EgrC01000
Eucgr.A01005.1EgrA01005
Eucgr.A01006.1EgrA01006-1
Eucgr.A01006.2EgrA01006-2
Eucgr.J01214.1EgrJ01214
Eucgr.J02615.1EgrJ02615
Eucgr.H00958.1EgrH00958
Eucgr.J00052.1EgrJ00052
cassava4.1_000398m.gMes000398
cassava4.1_000345m.gMes000345
cassava4.1_000359m.gMes000359
cassava4.1_030988m.gMes030988
cassava4.1_000410m.gMes000410
cassava4.1_000306m.gMes000306
cassava4.1_000385m.gMes000385
cassava4.1_000386m.gMes000386
cassava4.1_000399m.gMes000399
cassava4.1_000409m.gMes000409
cassava4.1_026648m.gMes026648
cassava4.1_021429m.gMes021429
Medtr5g029640.1Mtr5g029640
Medtr1g031500.1Mtr1g031500
Medtr2g022080.1Mtr2g022080
Medtr6g089620.1Mtr6g089620
Medtr2g021930.1Mtr2g021930
Medtr1g105850.1Mtr1g105850
Medtr8g078020.1Mtr8g078020
Medtr6g009670.1Mtr6g009670
Medtr8g133940.1Mtr8g133940
Medtr3g110110.1Mtr3g110110
Medtr8g133950.1Mtr8g133950
Medtr8g133840.1Mtr8g133840
Medtr4g107320.1Mtr4g107320
Medtr4g107560.1Mtr4g107560
Medtr6g009780.1Mtr6g009780
Medtr6g009880.1Mtr6g009880
Medtr6g009840.1Mtr6g009840
Medtr3g136400.1Mtr3g136400
Medtr7g046830.1Mtr7g046830
Medtr6g009450.1Mtr6g009450
Medtr3g102650.1Mtr3g102650
Medtr8g025810.1Mtr8g025810
Medtr4g110940.1Mtr4g110940
GSVIVT00000633001VvT00000633001
GSVIVT00003365001VvT00003365001
GSVIVT00003375001VvT00003375001
GSVIVT00003377001VvT00003377001
GSVIVT00014386001VvT00014386001
GSVIVT00016667001VvT00016667001
GSVIVT00018550001VvT00018550001
GSVIVT00019727001VvT00019727001
GSVIVT00019729001VvT00019729001
GSVIVT00020929001VvT00020929001
GSVIVT00024397001VvT00024397001
GSVIVT00028243001VvT00028243001
GSVIVT00030719001VvT00030719001
GSVIVT00034033001VvT00034033001
GSVIVT00037129001VvT00037129001
Sb01g039110.1SbABCB1
Sb02g019540.1SbABCB2
Sb03g011860.1SbABCB3
Sb03g023740.1SbABCB4
Sb03g031990.1SbABCB5
Sb03g032000.1SbABCB6
Sb03g032030.1SbABCB7
Sb03g033290.1SbABCB8
Sb03g047490.1SbABCB9
Sb04g006087.1SbABCB10
Sb04g006090.1SbABCB11
Sb04g006100.1SbABCB12
Sb04g022480.1SbABCB13
Sb04g031170.1SbABCB14
Sb06g001440.1SbABCB15
Sb06g018860.1SbABCB16
Sb06g020350.1SbABCB17
Sb06g030350.1SbABCB18
Sb07g003510.1SbABCB19
Sb07g003520.1SbABCB20
Sb07g023730.1SbABCB21
Sb09g002940.1SbABCB22
Sb09g027320.1SbABCB23
Sb09g027330.1SbABCB24
e_gw1.13.597.1SmABCB1
fgenesh1_pm.C_scaffold_6000062SmABCB2
fgenesh2_pg.C_scaffold_13000013SmABCB3
e_gw1.6.146.1SmABCB4
estExt_Genewise1Plus.C_350372SmABCB5
fgenesh1_pm.C_scaffold_42000045SmABCB6
e_gw1.0.369.1SmABCB7
fgenesh2_pg.C_scaffold_9000128SmABCB8
estExt_Genewise1.C_210058SmABCB9
fgenesh1_pm.C_scaffold_2000054SmABCB10
e_gw1.73.37.1SmABCB11
estExt_Genewise1Plus.C_90010SmABCB12
e_gw1.0.1863.1SmABCB13
e_gw1.22.307.1SmABCB14
fgenesh1_pm.C_scaffold_0000169SmABCB15
estExt_Genewise1.C_00569SmABCB16
e_gw1.73.196.1SmABCB17
fgenesh1_pm.C_scaffold_15000068SmABCB18
LOC_Os01g18670.1OsABCB1
LOC_Os01g35030.1OsABCB3
LOC_Os01g50080.1OsABCB4
LOC_Os01g50100.1OsABCB5
LOC_Os01g50160.1OsABCB6
LOC_Os01g52550.1OsABCB7
LOC_Os01g74470.1OsABCB8
LOC_Os02g09720.1OsABCB9
LOC_Os02g46680.1OsABCB11
LOC_Os03g08380.1OsABCB12
LOC_Os03g17180.1OsABCB13
LOC_Os04g40570.1OsABCB15
LOC_Os05g47490.1OsABCB18
LOC_Os05g47500.1OsABCB19
LOC_Os08g05690.1OsABCB20
LOC_Os08g05710.1OsABCB21
LOC_Os08g45030.1OsABCB22
Rco30078.t000079Rc30078_t000079
Rco30054.t000025Rc30054_t000025
Rco30076.t000120Rc30076_t000120
Rco30076.t000122Rc30076_t000122
Rco28180.t000015Rc28180_t000015
Rco30170.t000796Rc30170_t000796
Rco29581.t000001Rc29581_t000001
Rco29693.t000124Rc29693_t000124
Rco29822.t000171Rc29822_t000171
Rco29889.t000174Rc29889_t000174
Rco29889.t000175Rc29889_t000175
Pp1s252_67V6.1Pp1s252_67
Pp1s38_321V6.1Pp1s38_321
Pp1s28_282V6.1Pp1s28_282
Pp1s173_145V6.1Pp1s173_145
Pp1s1_780V2.1Pp1s1_780
Pp1s397_2V6.1Pp1s397_2
Pp1s188_78V6.1Pp1s188_78
Pp1s391_45V6.1Pp1s391_45
Pp1s338_12V6.1Pp1s338_12
Pp1s29_108V2.1Pp1s29_108
Vc_estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_30286VcProt1
Cre17.g725200Cre17_g725200
Cre17.g725150Cre17_g725150
AT2G36910AtABCB1
AT4G25960AtABCB2
AT4G01820AtABCB3
AT2G47000AtABCB4
AT4G01830AtABCB5
AT2G39480AtABCB6
AT5G46540AtABCB7
AT3G30875AtABCB8
AT4G18050AtABCB9
AT1G10680AtABCB10
At1g02520AtABCB11
AT1G02530AtABCB12
AT1G27940AtABCB13
AT1G28010AtABCB14
AT3G28345AtABCB15
AT3G28360AtABCB16
AT3G28380AtABCB17
AT3G28390AtABCB18
AT3G28860AtABCB19
AT3G55320AtABCB20
AT3G62150AtABCB21
AT3G28415AtABCB22
orange1.1g000851m.gCsi_g000851
orange1.1g000777m.gCsi_g000777
orange1.1g000789m.gCsi_g000789
orange1.1g000909m.gCsi_g000909
orange1.1g000830m.gCsi_g000830
orange1.1g000406m.gCsi_g000406
orange1.1g000687m.gCsi_g000687
orange1.1g000856m.gCsi_g000856
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000232m.gAco000232
AcoGoldSmith_v1.022827m.gAco022827
AcoGoldSmith_v1.027230m.gAco027230
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000200m.gAco000200
AcoGoldSmith_v1.018338m.gAco018338
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000314m.gAco000314
AcoGoldSmith_v1.022346m.gAco022346
AcoGoldSmith_v1.026987m.gAco026987
AcoGoldSmith_v1.022633m.gAco022633
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000202m.gAco000202
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000201m.gAco000201
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000230m.gAco000230
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000215m.gAco000215
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000236m.gAco000236
AcoGoldSmith_v1.000229m.gAco000229
AUX/LAXs
ppa005323m.gPpe005323
ppa005057m.gPpe005057
ppa004949m.gPpe004949
ppa004865m.gPpe004865
POPTR_0006s09940PtrAUX1/LAX5
POPTR_0016s12100PtrAUX2/LAX1
POPTR_0010s19840PtrAUX3/LAX2
POPTR_0008s06630PtrAUX4/LAX6
POPTR_0004s17860PtrAUX5/LAX7
POPTR_0009s13470PtrAUX6/LAX3
POPTR_0005s16020PtrAUX7/LAX8
POPTR_0002s08750PtrAUX8/LAX4
GRMZM2G067022_T01Zm2G067022
GRMZM2G127949_T01Zm2G127949
GRMZM2G045057_T01Zm2G045057
GRMZM2G149481_T01Zm2G149481
GRMZM2G129413_T01Zm2G129413
Eucgr.F03758.1EgrF03758_1
Eucgr.K02992.2EgrK02992_2
Eucgr.G03044.2EgrG03044_2
Eucgr.G01769.2EgrG01769_2
Eucgr.A00514.2EgrA00514_2
cassava4.1_006838m.gMes006838
cassava4.1_006423m.gMes006423
cassava4.1_006788m.gMes006788
cassava4.1_006570m.gMes006570
cassava4.1_006783m.gMes006783
cassava4.1_006474m.gMes006474
cassava4.1_007093m.gMes007093
Medtr3g024670.1Mtr3g024670
Medtr3g097960.1Mtr3g097960
Medtr5g089600.1Mtr5g089600
GSVIVT01008917001VvT01008917001
GSVIVT01024054001VvT01024054001
GSVIVT01032855001VvT01032855001
GSVIVT01033986001VvT01033986001
Sb01g026240.1SbLAX1
Sb01g041270.1SbLAX2
Sb03g040320.1SbLAX3
Sb05g004250.1SbLAX4
Sb09g021990.1SbLAX5
estExt_Genewise1Plus.C_20968SmAUX1
estExt_fgenesh2_pg.C_50586SmAUX2
LOC_Os01g63770.1OsLAX1
LOC_Os03g14080.1OsLAX2
LOC_Os05g37470.1OsLAX3
LOC_Os10g05690.1OsLAX4
LOC_Os11g06820.1OsLAX5
Rco29669.t000030Rc29669_t000030
Rco29741.t000002Rc29741_t000002
Rco29908.t000197Rc29908_t000197
Rco29969.t000004Rc29969_t000004
Pp1s90_46V6.1Pp1s90_46
Pp1s213_89V6.1Pp1s213_89
Pp1s211_67V6.1Pp1s211_67
AT2G38120.1AtAUX1
AT5G01240.1AtLAX1
AT2G21050.1AtLAX2
AT1G77690.1AtLAX3
orange1.1g011392m.gCsi_g011392
orange1.1g011022m.gCsi_g011022
orange1.1g012371m.gCsi_g012371
orange1.1g011966m.gCsi_g011966
AcoGoldSmith_v1.004219m.gAco004219
AcoGoldSmith_v1.004342m.gAco004342
AcoGoldSmith_v1.003895m.gAco003895
AY864733Pto-AY864733
AF115543Ptt-AF115543
PINs
ppa022797m.gPpe022797
ppa003159m.gPpe003159
ppa024134m.gPpe024134
ppa002528m.gPpe002528
ppa025174m.gPpe025174
ppa002944m.gPpe002944
ppa021573m.gPpe021573
ppa007621m.gPpe007621
POPTR_0015s04570PtrPIN1
POPTR_0016s03450PtrPIN2
POPTR_0010s12320PtrPIN3
POPTR_0005s20990PtrPIN4
POPTR_0002s07310PtrPIN5
POPTR_0008s12830PtrPIN6
POPTR_0012s04470PtrPIN7
POPTR_0006s03540PtrPIN8
POPTR_0018s13610PtrPIN9
POPTR_0001s21230PtrPIN10
POPTR_0013s08510PtrPIN11
POPTR_0019s07990PtrPIN12
POPTR_0004s12310PtrPIN13
POPTR_0017s11440PtrPIN14
POPTR_0014s14390PtrPIN15
XM_002336619.1PtrPIN16
ZmPIN1a_GRMZM2G098643ZmPIN1a
ZmPIN1b_GRMZM2G074267ZmPIN1b
ZmPIN1c_GRMZM2G149184ZmPIN1c
ZmPIN1d_GRMZM2G171702_T01ZmPIN1d
ZmPIN2ZmPIN2
ZmPIN5a-GRMZM2G025742ZmPIN5a
ZmPIN5b-GRMZM2G148648ZmPIN5b
ZmPIN5c-GRMZM2G040911ZmPIN5c
ZmPIN8_GRMZM5G839411ZmPIN8
ZmPIN9_GRMZM5G859099ZmPIN9
ZmPIN10a-GRMZM2G126260ZmPIN10a
ZmPIN10b-GRMZM2G160496ZmPIN10b
Eucgr.F04265.1EgrF04265_1
Eucgr.K02271.1EgrK02271_1
Eucgr.G02187.1EgrG02187_1
Eucgr.G02549.1EgrG02549_1
Eucgr.B01406.1EgrB01406_1
Eucgr.B02902.1EgrB02902_1
Eucgr.B00948.1EgrB00948_1
Eucgr.C00078.1EgrC00078_1
Eucgr.A02229.1EgrA02229_1
Eucgr.H01390.1EgrH01390_1
Eucgr.H01391.1EgrH01391_1
Eucgr.I01919.1EgrI01919_1
Eucgr.G02548.1EgrG02548_1
Eucgr.B01405.1EgrB01405_1
Eucgr.B01403.1EgrB01403_1
Eucgr.H01382.1EgrH01382_1
cassava4.1_003807m.gMes003807
cassava4.1_030090m.gMes030090
cassava4.1_029078m.gMes029078
cassava4.1_003367m.gMes003367
cassava4.1_006998m.gMes006998
cassava4.1_026579m.gMes026579
cassava4.1_003794m.gMes003794
cassava4.1_029063m.gMes029063
cassava4.1_033391m.gMes033391
cassava4.1_010688m.gMes010688
cassava4.1_010607m.gMes010607
Medtr2g043210Mtr2g043210
Medtr4g154810Mtr4g154810
Medtr6g083450Mtr6g083450
Medtr7g008720Mtr7g008720
Medtr7g089430Mtr7g089430
Medtr7g106430Mtr7g106430
Medtr8g130020Mtr8g130020
Medtr8g130040Mtr8g130040
MtrAAM55297MtrAAM55297
MtrAY115838MtrAY115838
MtrAAT48627MtrAAT48627
GSVIVT00014302001VvT00014302001
GSVIVT00017824001VvT00017824001
GSVIVT00020886001VvT00020886001
GSVIVT00023254001VvT00023254001
GSVIVT00023255001VvT00023255001
GSVIVT00025093001VvT00025093001
GSVIVT00025108001VvT00025108001
GSVIVT00030482001VvT00030482001
GSVIVT00031315001VvT00031315001
Sb02g029210.1SbPIN1
Sb03g029320.1SbPIN2
Sb03g032850.1SbPIN3
Sb03g037350.1SbPIN4
Sb03g043960.1SbPIN5
Sb04g028170.1SbPIN6
Sb05g002150.1SbPIN7
Sb07g026370.1SbPIN8
Sb10g004430.1SbPIN9
Sb10g008290.1SbPIN10
Sb10g026300.1SbPIN11
e_gw1.26.13.1Sm102666
e_gw1.59.169.1Sm119024
fgenesh1_pm.C_scaffold_9000007Sm231064
fgenesh1_pm.C_scaffold_59000022Sm234325
estExt_fgenesh1_pm.C_500006Sm268490
e_gw1.21.81.1Sm99301
Os01g45550.1OsPIN10a
Os01g51780OsPIN8
Os01g58860OsPIN9
Os01g69070OsPIN5a
Os02g50960.1OsPIN1b
Os05g50140OsPIN10b
Os06g12610OsPIN1a
Os06g44970OsPIN2
Os08g41720OsPIN5b
Os09g32770OsPIN5c
Os11g04190OsPIN1c
Os12g04000OsPIN1d
Rco27985.t000045Rc27985_t000045
Rco29662.t000026Rc29662_t000026
Rco29816.t000014Rc29816_t000014
Rco30180.t000054Rc30180_t000054
Rco29822.t000149Rc29822_t000149
Rco30128.t000486Rc30128_t000486
Pp1s10_17V6.1PpPIN1A
Pp1s18_186V6.1PpPIN1B
Pp1s32_43V6.1PpPIN1C
Pp1s79_126V6PpPIN1D
AT1G73590AtPIN1
AT5G57090AtPIN2
AT1G70940AtPIN3
AT2G01420AtPIN4
AT5G16530AtPIN5
AT1G77110AtPIN6
AT1G23080AtPIN7
AT5G15100AtPIN8
orange1.1g006199m.gCsi_g006199
orange1.1g007826m.gCsi_g007826
orange1.1g036474m.gCsi_g036474
orange1.1g041301m.gCsi_g041301
orange1.1g048649m.gCsi_g048649
orange1.1g035534m.gCsi_g035534
orange1.1g007420m.gCsi_g007420
orange1.1g018360m.gCsi_g018360
orange1.1g019021m.gCsi_g019021
AcoGoldSmith_v1.001931m.gAco001931
AcoGoldSmith_v1.018694m.gAco018694
AcoGoldSmith_v1.018139m.gAco018139
AcoGoldSmith_v1.016169m.gAco016169
AcoGoldSmith_v1.007499m.gAco007499
AcoGoldSmith_v1.021242m.gAco021242
AY302060PtoPIN1-like
AF190881PttPIN1
AF515435PttPIN2
AF515434PttPIN3

List of all the sequences used in the reconstruction of PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB families phylogenies.

Table A5

NameDirectionSequence (5′–3′)Tm (°C)aAmplicon (bp)
PIN1 RT-F3ForwardAAGCTGAAGATGGTAGGGACCTT5894
PIN1 RT-R3ReverseTGGGCGCCATAATCATGAC59
PIN2 RT-F4ForwardGATCAATGTTCAGGGATCAACAGA5981
PIN2 RT-R4ReverseGTTGTTGGTGGAAATGAAGTGAAA59
PIN3 RT-F3ForwardCTTCACGTTGCTATTGTTCAGG54.1238
PIN3 RT-R3ReverseTGACACACGACCAGCAAGTAA56.5
PIN4 RT-F4ForwardCGTTGGAATGAGAGGAGTGC55204
PIN4 RT-R4ReverseAATCTAAATTCCCCCTCTAATTCATGG54.8
PIN5 RT-F2ForwardGACTAATGCAACCAACACACCTTT5867
PIN5 RT-R2ReverseTGGATGCCGGGATATTTTACC59
PIN6 RT-F2ForwardCCATTCCACAAGCTGGAAATT53.7166
PIN6 RT-R2ReverseCCGGAATCTGGAGCGCCGA62.6
PIN7 RT-F4ForwardTCAGTGCTCGGGCATCAA5881
PIN7 RT-R4ReverseGGATCATTAGTAGATATGAAGTGGAAAGAG58
PIN8 RT-F2ForwardCTTCATTTGCTGTTGGACTACG54.1192
PIN8 RT-R2ReverseGTCCAAGCAAAATATAGTAAACCAGTGT55.6
PIN9 RT-F2ForwardGCTGCTTTTCAACCTGAATCCG57173
PIN9 RT-R2ReverseTCTGCTGCCATATCCATCTTCTTTTG57.3
PIN10 RT-F4ForwardGGCAGACACACCTACCCTGATC59.4100
PIN10 RT-R4ReverseCCGGAGGCATCTGTTGTTTC56.3
PIN11 RT-F3ForwardCAGCATTGCCACAGTCAATTACATC56.8196
PIN11 RT-R3ReverseGCCGAGCTATATTCCTCCTTCAAG57
PIN12 RT-F6ForwardGCTACGGCTGGTCCATTACC58100
PIN12 RT-R6ReverseACTGCCGTCGGCCCATA59.6
PIN13 RT-F2ForwardGGATACATTGAGCACAGGGGTAA56.6199
PIN13 RT-R2ReverseTGGACGGGACAGACTTCTATGATTC57.9
PIN14 RT-F3ForwardATAGTGATATTGTCAACAGGAGGG54.1175
PIN14 RT-R3ReverseCCAGTCTAACGGCGAAGGAAG57.6
PIN15 RT-F2ForwardTTTGCTGGGCTAATTTCTCAAGA55.5188
PIN15 RT-R1ReverseAGTGGGATCCCCATCACAAG54.9
PIN16 RT-F4ForwardGGTAACAATCTTGTCAAAGGCAGGT57.3199
PIN16 RT-R4ReverseGGATAGTTTCAACATGGTCCCTCTCA58.2
AUX1 RT-F1ForwardTCCCTTTATGCCAAGCTGGA56.5217
AUX1 RT-R1ReverseATGTAGTCAGCTCACTCAGCG56.6
AUX2 RT-F3ForwardCGTTCGGACTCTTCGCAAAG56.3100
AUX2 RT-R3ReverseTCTTGGGACTGATTTGCTTCAG55.1
AUX3 RT-F2ForwardGTTCACGGCCAGGTTGATG56.6100
AUX3 RT-R2ReverseCATGCCCACCAAAAGTGTAGAG56.1
AUX4 RT-F4ForwardAGGGTGGGCTAGTATGTCCAA57.7191
AUX4 RT-R4ReverseAAACACAATGCAGAGGAGATGC55.9
AUX5 RT-F1ForwardAGCCATCAAAGTACACGGGA56.3174
AUX5 RT-R1ReverseTCTGAGGTGGGCATTGGTAA56.1
AUX6 RT-F4ForwardCCTGTGGTTATTCCCATTTGGTT55.6180
AUX6 RT-R4ReverseGTACTTTGGTGGTTGCTCCA55.2
AUX7 RT-F2ForwardCGTCAGATTGATTCATTTGGTCTATTC54.2213
AUX7 RT-R2ReverseATCACACCTTTTCAAGAACCAACA55.2
AUX8 RT-F1ForwardGAGAGAATGCTGTGGAGAGAC54.8182
AUX8 RT-R1ReverseACACTGGTAGCACTTGGTGA56.2
ABCB1 RT-F4ForwardGATGGTAAAGTAGCAGAGCAAGGAT56.7212
ABCB1 RT-R4ReverseATGGGATATACTCCTCTTACTGGTGT56.5
ABCB2 RT-F3ForwardCAAGCATGAGACTCTGATTCATATCA54.7100
ABCB2 RT-R3ReverseAATATTGCAGGTGGTGACTCAAGA56.4
ABCB4 RT-F2ForwardGGGCAATCCTAAAGAATCCGAAAAT55.7264
ABCB4 RT-R4ReverseTATGAAGGGCGACCAAGGATG56.9
ABCB5 RT-F3ForwardTCGCAATACCTCCCGGTACA58.1100
ABCB5 RT-R3ReverseGCGTGCGGGTCGTAAAAC57.3
ABCB7 RT-F2ForwardGTGGTTTTGCTGTTAGATGAGGC56.5269
ABCB7 RT-R2ReverseACTGTTTTGTGTTGTCCTCTGG55.4
ABCB10 RT-F4ForwardCAG AAG CAA AGG GTA GCC ATT55.4211
ABCB10 RT-R4ReverseCTCCATTTTTAACCACTGCGATTAGA56.4
ABCB13 RT-F3ForwardCAAGAGCAATTCTGAAAGATCCACG56.3206
ABCB13 RT-R3ReverseACCTTTTTCCACTATCTTGCCATG55.6
ABCB14 RT-F1ForwardGACAGTCAAGTCAAAGAATCTCATTG54.2221
ABCB14 RT-R1ReverseTGGAACCTCTGGCTTGTTAAGA56
ABCB13 RT-F2ForwardCAAGAAGCACTGGACCGAATCAT57.4229
ABCB13 RT-R2ReverseTAAACACACGGAGGTGCTACAAT56.4
ABCB18 RT-F3ForwardAGCTCATCCATCGAATCTGAATCAA56.3211
ABCB18 RT-R3ReverseGCATCAGACGGACATACAAACCAT57.4
ABCB19 RT-F3ForwardTCTTAAGGACCCAGCAATCCTACT57.3100
ABCB19 RT-R3ReverseCCTCATTAGCCTCTCGAGTGCTT58.5
ACT2 RT-F1bForwardGCAACTGGGATGATATGGAGA54.3213
ACT2 RT-R1ReverseTACGACCACTGGCATACAGG56.5
UBQ RT-F1bForwardCAGCTTGAAGATGGGAGGAC55.4154
UBQ RT-R1ReverseCAATGGTGTCTGAGCTCTCG55.5
TUA2 RT-F1ForwardCCTACTGTAGTACCTGGGGGTG58.2230
TUA2 RT-R1ReverseCCAACTTCCTCGTAATCCTTCTCA56.2
PD-E1 RT-F1ForwardATGAGAACTGGTGGTATTGGTGC57.3164
PD-E1 RT-R1ReverseGTCACAATCTGGGCAGGTTGAAC58.5
CLONING AND SEQUENCING
M13FForwardTTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT54.7
M13RReverseCAGGAAACAGCTATGACC50.1
adp1-dT17cCCGGATCCTCTAGAGCGGCCGC(T)1764.6
adp1CCGGATCCTCTAGAGCGGCC61.9
PIN3 RT-F3ForwardCTTCACGTTGCTATTGTTCAGG54.1
PIN4 RT-F3ForwardCTTCAGCCTCGGATAATTGTATGC55.1
PIN11A RT-F3ForwardGCGATGTCTTACGTGTTGCTA55.1
PIN13 RT-F2ForwardGGATACATTGAGCACAGGGGTAA56.6
AUX4 RT-F3ForwardCCGACTCCTGCAAAACATCATTA55.4
ABCB1 RT-F3forwardCGCATGATACAGTTACAAAGGTTCA55.5

List of all primers used in the present work.

aMelting temperatures were calculated with the online tool OlygoAnalyzer v.3.1 from Integrated DNA Technologies.

bThese primer pairs have been first published in Secchi et al. (2009).

cThis primer sequence has been first published in Kramer et al. (1998).

Summary

Keywords

auxin, PIN, AUX/LAX, ABCB, Populus

Citation

Carraro N, Tisdale-Orr TE, Clouse RM, Knöller AS and Spicer R (2012) Diversification and Expression of the PIN, AUX/LAX, and ABCB Families of Putative Auxin Transporters in Populus. Front. Plant Sci. 3:17. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00017

Received

29 October 2011

Accepted

17 January 2012

Published

07 February 2012

Volume

3 - 2012

Edited by

Angus S. Murphy, Purdue University, USA

Reviewed by

Serge Delrot, University of Bordeaux, France; Ranjan Swarup, University of Nottingham, UK

Copyright

*Correspondence: Rachel Spicer, Department of Botany, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT 06320, USA. e-mail:

This article was submitted to Frontiers in Plant Physiology, a specialty of Frontiers in Plant Science.

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics