PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Plant Sci., 27 August 2014

Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions

Volume 5 - 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00377

On the current status of Phakopsora pachyrhizi genome sequencing

  • 1. Department of Plant Physiology, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University Aachen, Germany

  • 2. Institute for Botany and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Biology I, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University Aachen, Germany

  • 3. Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln Germany

  • 4. Genomics Core Facility, European Molecular Biology Laboratory Heidelberg, Germany

  • 5. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136, Champenoux France

  • 6. Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy France

  • 7. Institute of Bio- and Geosciences-2 Plant Sciences, Institute for Bio- and Geosciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich Germany

Abstract

Recent advances in the field of sequencing technologies and bioinformatics allow a more rapid access to genomes of non-model organisms at sinking costs. Accordingly, draft genomes of several economically important cereal rust fungi have been released in the last 3 years. Aside from the very recent flax rust and poplar rust draft assemblies there are no genomic data available for other dicot-infecting rust fungi. In this article we outline rust fungus sequencing efforts and comment on the current status of Phakopsora pachyrhizi (Asian soybean rust) genome sequencing.

Sequencing of fungal genomes represented a significant milestone in the emerging era of “genomics.” In fact, the first eukaryotic genome ever sequenced was that of baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which consequently strengthened its position as a fungal model organism after the release of the 12 Mb genome with approximately 6000 genes in 1996 (). Some time thereafter the genomes of the fission yeast S. pombe (14 Mb) and the filamentous ascomycete Neurospora crassa (40 Mb) were released in and , respectively. Accelerated progress in sequencing technology from early clone-by-clone approaches through Sanger-based whole-genome shotgun sequencing (WGS) to today’s next-generation sequencing (NGS) shortened the periods between releases of novel genomes considerably (). This paved the way for comparative genomics which opened new possibilities for people working in the field of agriculture and biotechnology or combating human, animal or plant diseases (; ; ).

In the latter field, the sequencing of the genome of the ascomycete Magnaporthe oryzae was achieved by . Along with the genome of rice (), the M. oryzae host plant, an understanding of the plant–pathogen interaction became possible at the genome level. Since then, several plant-pathogenic fungi were sequenced; however, a group of pathogens that exclusively feed from living plant tissue, so-called obligate biotrophs, remained recalcitrant. This was disappointing particularly because some of the most economically serious threats to human nutrition, such as powdery mildew fungi and rust fungi, are among this group.

Rust fungi have long been in the focus of plant pathologists. Already in the 19th century, Anton de Bary, who is considered as a founder of plant pathology, picked up Puccinia graminis with its various formae speciales that are specialized for parasitism on particular cereal hosts, as subject for his groundbreaking studies. Later Harold Henry Flor developed the famous “gene-for-gene” concept based on his work on the interaction of flax rust (Melampsora lini) with its host plant flax (Linum usitatissimum; ). Despite considerable interest, sequencing of rust genomes was not achieved until most recently. Thus, the 101 Mb genome of Melampsora larici-populina and the 89 Mb draft genome of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici were sequenced in a common effort by the Joint Genome Institute and the Broad Institute, respectively, and published in . Following, more or less advanced draft genomes of other rust fungi were sequenced and published by the community, such as several Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici races (56–110 Mb) and the flax rust genome M. lini (, ; ; ; see Table 1). Although Pucciniales is an order with a lesser coverage compared to other fungi1, more genomic resources are becoming accessible. A major drawback encountered during sequencing efforts of rust genomes was their unexpected large sizes, a fact that also hampered attempts of sequencing the genome of the Asian soybean rust fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi, an economically important threat to soybean cultivation. The following commentary is written to give an overview on the current status of P. pachyrhizi genome sequencing and is intended to initiate combined activities toward this goal.

Table 1

OrganismGenome size (Mb)Estimation/sequencing methodReference
Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme90Flow cytometry
Hemileia vastatrix733.5Flow cytometry
Melampsora larici-populina101Sanger sequencing
Melampsora lini189Next-generation sequencing
Puccinia coronata77Flow cytometry
Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici89Sanger sequencing
Puccinia hordei121Flow cytometry
Puccinia recondita127Flow cytometry
Puccinia sorghi102Flow cytometry
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, race PST-13065Next-generation sequencing
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, races PST-21, PST-43, PST-87/7, PST-08/2173, 71, 53, 56Next-generation sequencing
Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, isolate CY32110Next-generation sequencing, “fosmid-to-fosmid” sequencing
Puccinia triticiana 1-1 BBDB race 1135Assembly
Uromyces appendiculatus418Flow cytometry
Uromyces vignae407Flow cytometry

Published rust fungi draft genomes and genome size estimations in alphabetical order.

What makes P. pachyrhizi so interesting? For sure it is a devastating fungal disease of the important crop plant soybean. The origin of the pathogen can be traced back to Asia and most likely it spread alongside with the propagation of soybean cultivation. P. pachyrhizi is able to infect more than 31 species from 17 genera of legumes, which is a rather unusual feature for rust fungi that usually are highly specialized for particular hosts (). P. pachyrhizi differs in a further important aspect from the majority of rusts: it directly penetrates leaf cells rather than entering the leaf via stomata at the uredinial stage. On the contrary, most rust fungi use stomata to get inside the host tissues at this stage and a direct penetration is only observed for some rust fungi when basidiospores infect the aecial host at later stages of the rust life cycle (). Recent studies imply that generation of high turgor pressure of around 5 MPa in the non-melanized appressoria supports penetration (). Penetrated epidermal cells undergo a cell death response, again an unexpected property for a biotrophic pathogen. Experiments with non-host plants such as barley and Arabidopsis showed that during penetration and concomitant epidermal cell death, marker genes associated with responses to necrotrophic pathogens are switched on and that cell death suppression had a negative influence on infection success of P. pachyrhizi (; ). Regarding its lifestyle, P. pachyrhizi which forms so far only a single spore type in the wild, i.e. urediospores, is a minimalist compared to, e.g., Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici which has five distinct spore types and performs a host jump (). Despite the unknown or missing sexual life cycle the genetic diversity of P. pachyrhizi seems not to be impaired. This may be explained by parasexual nuclear recombination occurring between different isolates after germ tube fusion or hyphal anastomosis, a feature also reported for cereal rusts (; ).

Public information about the P. pachyrhizi genome sequencing project is rare. In the DoE JGI Community Sequencing Program of 2004, a project was launched to sequence the genome of P. pachyrhizi (isolate Taiwan 72-1) based on a fosmid shotgun sequencing approach. The genome size prediction with 50 Mb at that time was much underestimated. The sequencing project has now a “permanent draft” status at the JGI2. Besides the recently released mitochondrial genome sequence (), information on assembly attempts of the nuclear genome have not been published. The major drawback for progress in P. pachyrhizi genome sequencing seems to be its huge size. An update on this topic was given at the National Soybean Rust Symposium 2005 in Nashville (TN, USA). Genome size estimations ranged from 300 to 950 Mb depending on the analysis method used (). A similar statement was provided by Igor Grigoriev (Head of the JGI Fungal Program) suggesting a genome size above 850 Mb (). Besides, other general features of rust fungi genomes unraveled since then, such as expanded multigene families and very large amount of transposable elements (>45%), pose serious problems for proper genome assembly.

We started our own efforts toward uncovering the genome size of P. pachyrhizi by using our lab isolate (Brazil 05-1) and we followed a strategy based on k-mer analysis. By breaking down the reads obtained by Illumina sequencing into short nucleotide sequences of defined length k (k-mers), several characteristics of genomes, like size, heterozygosity and repeat content, can be analyzed, that would normally require a complete de novo assembly. As basis for our analysis, DNA was generated from urediospores of the P. pachyrhizi isolate Brazil 05-1. A total of 47 Gb Illumina whole-genome sequencing data (100 bp paired-end reads) were then subjected to analysis using the program JELLYFISH (). In the 17-mer distribution depicted in Figure 1, two peaks could be differentiated at a depth of 37 and 75. This can be explained by the dikaryotic nature of the urediospores of rust fungi, which means that these organisms maintain two haploid nuclei separately during prolonged stages of their lifecycle. The two peaks in the k-mer histogram point to a high degree of heterozygosity between the two nuclei or to largely heterozygotic regions within the haploid nuclei. Similar results were also observed by in the case of the wheat stripe rust fungus.

FIGURE 1

By adding up the products of k-mer depth coverage and frequency for each pair of values in Figure 1, divided by the depth coverage of the first peak (=37), the size of the genome in bp was computed, similarly as in (). Values, smaller than the first minimum in Figure 1, were considered noise caused by sequencing errors and were excluded from the calculation. Based on this analysis, the overall size of the dikaryotic genome of P. pachyrhizi is at most around 1 Gb. However, due to the unknown degree of heterozygosity between or within the genomes of both nuclei, this might be an overestimation (see above). The minimal size of the haploid genome can be estimated to be around 500 Mb, based on the second peak in the k-mer analysis (Figure 1). This would place the genome of the Asian soybean fungus in the same range as published rust genomes, e.g., Hemileia vastatrix (733.5 Mb) and Uromyces spp. (420 Mb; Table 1). It should be noted, however, that the analysis method might considerably influence the outcome of such genome size estimations. The genome size of H. vastatrix, e.g., was estimated by DNA-staining in combination with flow cytometry which itself is prone to errors but has the advantage of not being sequencing-dependent (). Phenomena related to the partial heterozygosity of the P. pachyrhizi genome are only detectable by assembly or k-mer analysis as described above. Since we did not use a large insert size sequencing approach for genome size estimation, we obtained a N50 value of 569 bp after assembly and scaffolding with SOAPdenovo. This allowed no prediction on gene number or length. In future studies a combined BAC- and third generation sequencing approach hopefully will increase the assembly quality to a point at which comprehensive gene predictions become possible.

Working with organisms, whose genome has been sequenced provides many advantages over working with non-sequenced species. Besides the comprehensive prediction of all genes, intra-genomic structural analyses or comparative genome analyses between different species become possible. An alternative to genomic-based approaches in large-scale analyses of plant-pathogen-interactions, however, is the use of transcriptomics, proteomics, or metabolomics (). Up to now, only limited information is available on P. pachyrhizi transcriptomics, though very recent publications have broadened the view on particular aspects of the infection process of P. pachyrhizi (, , ; ). For instance, Illumina-based transcriptome profiling at several stages of soybean leaf infection has led to the identification of nearly 19,000 transcripts not previously identified in other rust fungi (). This would imply a much larger gene complement in the soybean rust than in other rust fungi. So far, the numbers of genes reported in rust fungi are between 15,000 and 20,000 genes (). Although biases in the RNA-Seq approach can not be excluded, it is possible that the P. pachyrhizi genome has experienced a high level of gene duplication during its evolution along with important transposable element activity that could explain the huge genome size predicted for this species. There is an urgent need for genome sequences as prerequisite for accurate large scale expression analysis and more RNA-seq efforts are needed. Without a genome, transcript reads have to be assembled first and not only RNA quality and sequencing technique used will influence the resulting assembly quality but also the algorithms used for assembly. And even if these problems could be sufficiently solved, the resulting contigs are much smaller than transcribed ORFs, limiting for example predictions of putatively secreted proteins. Also, redundancy within gene families could be better resolved when compared to a reference genome sequence.

Hopefully in the near future, the development of novel sequencing and assembly strategies, together with dropping costs for NGS, will make the sequencing of large and complex genomes more affordable and will help to unravel the secrets of the genome of P. pachyrhizi.

Statements

Acknowledgments

We thank Ralph Panstruga (Biology I, RWTH Aachen) for helpful discussions. We thank Anthony Bolger (Biology I, RWTH Aachen University) for helpful advice on k-mer analysis. Sébastien Duplessis acknowledges the ANR “Investissements d’Avenir” program (ANR-11-LABX-0002-01, Lab of Excellence ARBRE).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1

    AndersonC. L.KubisiakT. L.NelsonC. D.SmithJ. A.DavisJ. M. (2010). Genome size variation in the pine fusiform rust pathogen Cronartium quercuum f.sp. fusiforme as determined by flow cytometry.Mycologia10212951302. 10.3852/10-040

  • 2

    BainardJ. D.FazekasA. J.NewmasterS. G. (2010). Methodology significantly affects genome size estimates: quantitative evidence using bryophytes.Cytometry77725732. 10.1002/cyto.a.20902

  • 3

    BolgerM. E.WeisshaarB.ScholzU.SteinN.UsadelB.MayerK. F. (2014). Plant genome sequencing — applications for crop improvement.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.263137. 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.08.019

  • 4

    CantuD.GovindarajuluM.KozikA.WangM.ChenX.KojimaK. K.et al (2011). Next generation sequencing provides rapid access to the genome of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the causal agent of wheat stripe rust.PLoS ONE6:e24230. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024230

  • 5

    CantuD.SegoviaV.MacLeanD.BaylesR.ChenX.KamounS.et al (2013). Genome analyses of the wheat yellow (stripe) rust pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici reveal polymorphic and haustorial expressed secreted proteins as candidate effectors.BMC Genomics14:270. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-270

  • 6

    CarvalhoG. M. A.CarvalhoC. R.BarretoR. W.EvansH. C. (2013). Coffee rust genome measured using flow cytometry: does size matter?Plant Pathol.10.1111/ppa.12175

  • 7

    DeanR. A.TalbotN. J.EbboleD. J.FarmanM. L.MitchellT. K.OrbachM. J.et al (2005). The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea.Nature434980986. 10.1038/nature03449

  • 8

    DuplessisS.BakkerenG.HamelinR. (2014). “Advancing knowledge on biology of rust fungi through genomics,” inAdvances in Botanical Research1st EdnVol. 70ed.MartinF. (London: Elsevier) 173209.

  • 9

    DuplessisS.CuomoC. A.LinY.-C.AertsA.TisserantE.Veneault-FourreyC.et al (2011). Obligate biotrophy features unraveled by the genomic analysis of rust fungi.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10891669171. 10.1073/pnas.1019315108

  • 10

    DuplessisS.JolyD. J.DoddsP. N. (2012). “Rust Effectors,” inEffectors in Plant-Microbe Interactions1st EdnedsMartinF.KamounS. (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd) 155193.

  • 11

    EilamT.BushnellW. R.AniksterY. (1994). Relative nuclear DNA content of rust fungi estimated by flow cytometry of propidium iodide-stained pycniospores.Phytopathology84728735. 10.1094/Phyto-84-728

  • 12

    FellersJ. P.SoltaniB. M.BruceM.LinningR.CuomoC. ASzaboL. J.et al (2013). Conserved loci of leaf and stem rust fungi of wheat share synteny interrupted by lineage-specific influx of repeat elements.BMC Genomics14:60. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-60

  • 13

    FlorH. H. (1955). Host-parasite interaction in flax rust - its genetics and other implications.Phytopathology45680685.

  • 14

    GalaganJ. E.CalvoS. E.BorkovichK. A.SelkerE. U.ReadN. D.JaffeD.et al (2003). The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa.Nature422859868. 10.1038/nature01554

  • 15

    GoellnerK.LoehrerM.LangenbachC.ConrathU.KochE.SchaffrathU. (2010). Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the causal agent of Asian soybean rust.Mol. Plant Pathol.11169177. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00589.x

  • 16

    GoffS. A.RickeD.LanT.-H.PrestingG.WangR.DunnM.et al (2002). A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica).Science29692100. 10.1126/science.1068275

  • 17

    GoffeauA.BarrellB. G.BusseyH.DavisR. W.DujonB.FeldmannH.et al (1996). Life with 6000 genes.Science274546567. 10.1126/science.274.5287.546

  • 18

    GrigorievI. V. (2014). “A changing landscape of fungal genomics,” inEcological Genomics of the Fungi1st Edned.MartinF. (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd) 320.

  • 19

    HeathM. C. (1997). Signalling between pathogenic rust fungi and resistant or susceptible host plants.Ann. Bot.80713720. 10.1006/anbo.1997.0507

  • 20

    HoefleC.LoehrerM.SchaffrathU.FrankM.SchultheissH.HückelhovenR. (2009). Transgenic suppression of cell death limits penetration success of the soybean rust fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi into epidermal cells of barley.Phytopathology99220226. 10.1094/PHYTO-99-3-0220

  • 21

    LeonardK. J.SzaboL. J. (2005). Stem rust of small grains and grasses caused by Puccinia graminis.Mol. Plant Pathol.699111. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00273.x

  • 22

    LiR.FanW.TianG.ZhuH.HeL.CaiJ.et al (2010). The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome.Nature463311317. 10.1038/nature08696

  • 23

    LinkT. I.LangP.SchefflerB. E.DukeM. V.GrahamM. A.CooperB.et al (2013). The haustorial transcriptomes of Uromyces appendiculatus and Phakopsora pachyrhizi and their candidate effector families.Mol. Plant Pathol.15379393. 10.1111/mpp.12099

  • 24

    LoehrerM.BotterweckJ.JahnkeJ.MahlmannD. M.GaetgensJ.OldigesM.et al (2014). In vivo assessment of the invasive force exerted by the Asian soybean rust fungus by mach-zehnder double-beam interferometry.New Phytol.203620631. 10.1111/nph.12784

  • 25

    LoehrerM.LangenbachC.GoellnerK.ConrathU.SchaffrathU. (2008). Characterization of nonhost resistance of Arabidopsis to the Asian soybean rust.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.2114211430. 10.1094/MPMI-21-11-1421

  • 26

    ManningV. A.PandelovaI.DhillonB.WilhelmL. J.GoodwinS. B.BerlinA. M.et al (2013). Comparative genomics of a plant-pathogenic fungus, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, reveals transduplication and the impact of repeat elements on pathogenicity and population divergence.G3 (Bethesda)34163. 10.1534/g3.112.004044

  • 27

    MarçaisG.KingsfordC. (2011). A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers.Bioinformatics27764770. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011

  • 28

    NemriA.SaundersD. G. O.AndersonC.UpadhyayaN. M.WinJ.LawrenceG. J.et al (2014). The genome sequence and effector complement of the flax rust pathogen Melampsora lini.Front. Plant Sci.5:98. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00098

  • 29

    Posada-BuitragoM. L.BooreJ. L.FrederickR. D. (2005). “Soybean Rust Genome Sequencing Project,” inProceedings of the National Soybean Rust Symposium,Nashville, TN.Available at: http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/infocenter/topic/soybeanrust/symposium/posters/3.pdf [accessed November1416, 2005].

  • 30

    StoneC. L.Posada-BuitragoM. L.BooreJ. L.FrederickR. D. (2010). Analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome sequences of the soybean rust pathogens Phakopsora pachyrhizi andP. meibomiae. Mycologia102887897. 10.3852/09-198

  • 31

    TanK.-C.IpchoS. V. S.TrengoveR. D.OliverR. P.SolomonP. S. (2009). Assessing the impact of transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics on fungal phytopathology.Mol. Plant Pathol.10703715. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00565.x

  • 32

    TremblayA.HosseiniP.AlkharoufN. W.LiS.MatthewsB. F. (2010). Transcriptome analysis of a compatible response by Glycine max to Phakopsora pachyrhizi infection.Plant Sci.179183193. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.04.011

  • 33

    TremblayA.HosseiniP.LiS.AlkharoufN. W.MatthewsB. F. (2012). Identification of genes expressed by Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the pathogen causing soybean rust, at a late stage of infection of susceptible soybean leaves.Plant Pathol.61773786. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02550.x

  • 34

    TremblayA.HosseiniP.LiS.AlkharoufN. W.MatthewsB. F. (2013). Analysis of Phakopsora pachyrhizi transcript abundance in critical pathways at four time-points during infection of a susceptible soybean cultivar using deep sequencing.BMC Genomics14:614. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-614

  • 35

    VebøH. C.SnipenL.NesI. F.BredeD. A. (2009). The transcriptome of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecalis V583 reveals adaptive responses to growth in blood.PLoS ONE4:e7660. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007660

  • 36

    VittalR.YangH.-C.HartmanG. L. (2012). Anastomosis of germ tubes and migration of nuclei in germ tube networks of the soybean rust pathogen, Phakopsora pachyrhizi.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.132163167. 10.1007/s10658-011-9872-5

  • 37

    WangX.McCallumB. (2009). Fusion body formation, germ tube anastomosis, and nuclear migration during the germination of urediniospores of the wheat leaf rust fungus, Puccinia triticina.Phytopathology9913551364. 10.1094/PHYTO-99-12-1355

  • 38

    WoodV.GwilliamR.RajandreamM.-A.LyneM.LyneR.StewartA.et al (2002). The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.Nature415871880. 10.1038/nature724

  • 39

    ZhengW.HuangL.HuangJ.WangX.ChenX.ZhaoJ.et al (2013). High genome heterozygosity and endemic genetic recombination in the wheat stripe rust fungus.Nat. Commun.42673. 10.1038/ncomms3673

Summary

Keywords

fungal genomics, rust fungi, Asian soybean rust, next-generation sequencing, herterozygosity, genome size, k-mer analysis

Citation

Loehrer M, Vogel A, Huettel B, Reinhardt R, Benes V, Duplessis S, Usadel B and Schaffrath U (2014) On the current status of Phakopsora pachyrhizi genome sequencing. Front. Plant Sci. 5:377. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00377

Received

31 May 2014

Accepted

14 July 2014

Published

27 August 2014

Volume

5 - 2014

Edited by

David L. Joly, Université de Moncton, Canada

Reviewed by

John Fellers, United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, USA; Ralf Thomas Voegele, Universität Hohenheim, Germany

Copyright

*Correspondence: Ulrich Schaffrath, Department of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52056 Aachen, Germany e-mail:

This article was submitted to Plant-Microbe Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics