Abstract
Ethylene and abscisic acid (ABA) both accelerate senescence of detached Arabidopsis leaves. We previously showed that suppression of Phospholipase Dδ (PLDδ) retarded ABA-promoted senescence. Here, we report that ethylene-promoted senescence is retarded in detached leaves lacking PLDδ. We further used lipidomics to comparatively profile the molecular species of membrane lipids between wild-type and PLDδ-knockout (PLDδ-KO) Arabidopsis during ethylene-promoted senescence. Lipid profiling revealed that ethylene caused a decrease in all lipids levels, except phosphatidic acid (PA), caused increases in the ratios of digalactosyl diglyceride/monogalactosyl diglyceride (MGDG) and phosphatidylcholine (PC)/phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and caused degradation of plastidic lipids before that of extraplastidic lipids in wild-type plants. The accelerated degradation of plastidic lipids during ethylene-promoted senescence in wild-type plants was attenuated in PLDδ-KO plants. No obvious differences in substrate and product of PLDδ-catalyzed phospholipid hydrolysis were detected between wild-type and PLDδ-KO plants, which indicated that the retardation of ethylene-promoted senescence by suppressing PLDδ might not be related to the role of PLDδ in catalyzing phospholipid degradation. In contrast, higher plastidic lipid content, especially of MGDG, in PLDδ-KO plants was crucial for maintaining photosynthetic activity. The lower relative content of PA and higher PC/PE ratio in PLDδ-KO plants might contribute to maintaining cell membrane integrity. The integrity of the cell membrane in PLDδ-KO plants facilitated maintenance of the membrane function and of the proteins associated with the membrane. Taking these findings together, higher plastidic lipid content and the integrity of the cell membrane in PLDδ-KO plants might contribute to the retardation of ethylene-promoted senescence by the suppression of PLDδ.
Introduction
Leaf senescence, the final stage of leaf development, is a genetically regulated, highly ordered process by which plants mobilize and recycle nutrients from leaves to other plant parts, such as seeds, storage organs, or developing leaves and flowers (). Chlorophyll degradation is the first visible symptom of senescence, and chloroplast membrane degradation, which parallels a loss in photosynthetic activity, was shown to occur before degradation of the membranes of other organelles (). Chloroplast membranes, especially the plastidic membrane, are believed to be highly vulnerable to heat-stress-associated damage (; ), and the damage of these membranes is an event that occurs at an early stage during leaf senescence (). The plastidic membrane consists mainly of four lipids: monogalactosyl diglyceride (MGDG), digalactosyl diglyceride (DGDG), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol (SQDG; ), with MGDG and DGDG comprising 70–80% of the plastidic lipid matrix associated with photosynthetic membranes. The cytosolic leaflet of the outer envelope membrane also contains a few phosphatidylcholine (PC; ).
Membranes of extraplastidic organelles mainly consist of phospholipids, and only a fraction of the extraplastidic membranes contain very small amount DGDG (). The degradation of phospholipids is mediated by several enzyme cascades initiated by various phospholipases, including phospholipases A, C, and D. Phospholipase D (PLD) hydrolyzes phospholipids into phosphatidic acid (PA) and head group, and it has 12 members in Arabidopsis (). The suppression of major PLD, PLDα1, retards abscisic acid (ABA)- or ethylene-promoted senescence (). Phospholipid Dδ (PLDδ), one of most abundant PLDs, has several properties that distinguish it from other PLDs (). PLDδ is activated by oleic acid and is tightly associated with the plasma membrane and microtubule (MT) cytoskeleton (; ; ). Analyses of PLDδ-altered Arabidopsis suggest that PLDδ positively regulates plant tolerance to stresses such as freezing (, ) and ultraviolet irradiation (). Our previous study found that the suppression of PLDδ retards ABA-promoted senescence through attenuating PA production (). However, whether PLDδ functions in ethylene-promoted senescence is unknown so far.
Ethylene is considered to be a major hormonal regulator of senescence in most plant organs, including leaf, cotyledon, and petal (). It promotes senescence through the enhancement of various lipid catabolic processes (), and then the lipid metabolism enhances senescence through the regulation of ethylene production and/or action (). It is noted that the ethylene-mediated increase in membrane permeability in senescing Tradescantia correlated temporally with a reduction in the tissue levels of phospholipids (). The decline of phospholipid content is shown to result in the loss of membrane integrity and physical changes in plant membrane lipids during senescence, which greatly increased the permeability of lipid bilayers (; ). Given that PLDδ is one of major lipolytic enzymes, whether it has a role in the lipid changes during ethylene promoted senescence remains to test.
In the present study, we compared the ethylene-promoted leaf senescence between Wassilewskija (WS) ecotype and PLDδ-knockout mutant Arabidopsis and found that suppression of PLDδ retarded ethylene-promoted senescence. Profiling the changes of molecular lipid species by using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) in WS and PLDδ-KO detached leaves revealed how lipid changes and provided insight into the function of PLDδ in ethylene-promoted senescence.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials, Growth Conditions, and Hormone Treatments
A PLDδ-knockout mutant was previously isolated from Arabidopsis Wassilewskija ecotype (WS). The loss of PLDδ was confirmed by the absence of its transcript, protein and activity ().
Two Arabidopsis genotypes were grown in water in a controlled growth chamber at 23°C (day) and 19°C (night) and 60% relative humidity under a 12 h photoperiod, with fluorescent lighting at 120 μmol m-2 sec-1. Fully expanded leaves of the same age were collected from approximately 6-week-old plants of the two genotypes of Arabidopsis; the detached leaves were rinsed briefly with sterile water and placed with the adaxial side up in Petri dishes containing 50 μM ethephon (Sigma, C0143). We chose ethephon rather than ethylene for incubation of the detached leaves because it is easier to control, but has an identical effect on the detached leaves. The leaves were incubated at 23°C under a 12 h photoperiod and light at 120 μmol m-2 sec-1.
Measurements of Chlorophyll Content, Photosynthetic Activity and Cell Death
Chlorophyll was extracted incubation of leaves after incubation with ethephon in, 80% acetone. Chlorophyll content was determined spectrophotometrically at 663 and 646 nm as described previously (). Chlorophyll fluorescence was analyzed using an imaging chlorophyll fluorometer, MAXI-Imaging Pulse-Amplitude (PAM; Walz, Germany; ). The maximal quantum yield of photosystem II (PS II; Fv/Fm) photochemistry was measured after adaptation to complete darkness for 20 min.
Cell death, indicated by loss of plasma membrane integrity, was quantified spectrophotometrically by Evans blue staining of detached leaves, using a previously described method with minor modifications (). Briefly, detached leaves were incubated with 0.1% (w/v) Evans blue for 2 h with shaking, and then washed extensively to remove unbound dye. The leaves were ground into powder in liquid nitrogen. The tissue powder was incubated with 50% (v/v) methanol and 1% (w/v) SDS at 60°C for 30 min, and then centrifuged. For a control measurement of 100% cell death, the leaves were heated at 100°C for 5 min. Absorbance was measured at 600 nm.
Lipid Extraction and Analysis
The processes of lipid extraction, ESI-MS/MS analysis and quantification were performed in accordance with a protocol from . Data processing was performed as previously described. The lipids in each class were quantified by comparison with two internal standards of the class. Five replicates of each treatment for each genotype were analyzed. The Q test was performed on the total amount of lipid in each head-group class, and data from discordant samples was removed ().
Data Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Origin 7.0 (Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). For all quantitative measurements in this study, five replicates from each sampling time were analyzed. The data were subjected to one-way ANOVA analysis (duncan’s multiple range test) of variance with SPSS 16.0.
Results
Suppression of PLDδ Retarded Ethylene-promoted Senescence
Leaves detached from WS plants started yellowing 1 day after treatment and turned almost completely yellow 5 days after incubation in 50 μM ethephon under light. In contrast, most parts of the PLDδ-KO leaves were still green after the 5-day ethylene treatment, which indicated a much slower senescence process in the PLDδ-deficient leaves (Figure 1A, top). Consistent with the visible yellowing, the photochemical quantum efficiency of the photosystem II (PS II) reaction center (Fv/Fm) in ethylene-treated leaves was much lower in WS plants than in PLDδ-KO mutants (Figure 1A, bottom). Measurements of chlorophyll content showed that chlorophyll was lost more quickly from WS leaves, diminishing by 37% after 5 days, whereas PLDδ-KO mutant leaves lost just 20% of their chlorophyll content upon treatment with ethylene (Figure 1B, top). Data on cell viability showed that the rate of cell death was significantly higher in the WS leaves during the ethylene-promoted senescence process, as measured by Evans blue staining (Figure 1B, bottom). These results indicate that the suppression of PLDδ retarded, to some extent, ethylene-promoted senescence.
FIGURE 1
Large Changes in Lipid Profiles Occurred during Ethylene-promoted Senescence
Metabolism of membrane lipids is one of several biochemical manifestations of cellular senescence (
Table 1
| Lipids | Genotypes | Lipids/dry weight (nmol/mg) | RC (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0# | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 3 | Day 5 | ||
| PG | WS | 12.86 ± 1.89a | 10.82 ± 2.92a | 2.14 ± 0.72c | - | -83.4 |
| PLDδ-KO | 12.67 ± 4.97a | 6.73 ± 1.51b | 4.56 ± 1.76b | -46.9 | -64.0 | |
| PC | WS | 16.73 ± 1.56a | 17.97 ± 6.90a | 9.25 ± 2.52b | - | -44.7 |
| PLDδ-KO | 15.21 ± 4.66ˆab | 13.82 ± 3.36ˆab | 10.93 ± 2.00ˆab | - | - | |
| PE | WS | 9.86 ± 1.09a | 8.53 ± 3.27ˆab | 5.28 ± 1.85ˆbc | - | -46.5 |
| PLDδ-KO | 9.17 ± 2.81a | 6.43 ± 1.67ˆab | 5.13 ± 1.43c | - | -44.1 | |
| PI | WS | 2.38 ± 0.56ˆab | 2.90 ± 0.80a | 1.62 ± 0.87b | - | |
| PLDδ-KO | 2.55 ± 0.52ˆab | 3.14 ± 1.00a | 2.05 ± 0.53ˆab | - | - | |
| PA | WS | 0.07 ± 0.05a | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 0.07 ± 0.03a | - | - |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.09 ± 0.06a | 0.09 ± 0.02a | 0.08 ± 0.02a | - | - | |
| PS | WS | 0.35 ± 0.06a | 0.12 ± 0.11b | 0.33 ± 0.22ˆab | -65.7 | - |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.20 ± 0.06ˆab | 0.14 ± 0.07b | 0.36 ± 0.08a | - | - | |
| MGDG | WS | 235.55 ± 17.65a | 175.83 ± 19.04b | 76.69 ± 16.18d | -25.4 | -67.4 |
| PLDδ-KO | 217.78 ± 25.85a | 187.69 ± 43.08b | 103.67 ± 13.18c | -13.8 | -52.4 | |
| DGDG | WS | 31.73 ± 4.78a | 25.22 ± 2.07c | 14.80 ± 1.25e | -20.5 | -53.4 |
| PLDδ-KO | 31.85 ± 6.85a | 28.07 ± 1.83b | 16.43 ± 1.59d | -11.9 | -48.4 | |
| Total lipids/dry weight (nmol/mg) | ||||||
| Total lipids | WS | 302.20 ± 28.25a | 249.05 ± 8.51b | 94.53 ± 4.60d | -17.6 | -68.7 |
| PLDδ-KO | 283.52 ± 38.85a | 252.81 ± 4.85ˆab | 139.84 ± 4.99c | - | -50.7 | |
Total lipids in leaves of Wassilewskija (WS) and PLDδ-KO plants during ethylene-promoted senescence.
The relative change (RC) in the levels of lipids from days 0 to 3 and 5 is the percentage value for the significant difference between the values at day 0 and days 3 and 5 over the value at day 0. Values in the same lipid molecular species with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Values are means ± SD (n = 5). Annotation: data of “#” column is from
As an overview, most lipid species changed dramatically in terms of both their level (absolute value; Figure 2, left) and the composition (relative value; Figure 2, right) during ethylene-promoted senescence in the leaves of both genotypes of Arabidopsis. The levels of most lipids declined in both WS and PLDδ-KO leaves, although there were some differences in the profiles of membrane lipids between plants of the two genotypes during ethylene-promoted senescence (Figure 2). Clustering of the lipid contents of leaves in ethylene-promoted senescence suggested that the ethylene treatment was the main factor inducing the degradation of membrane lipids. The differences between WS and PLDδ-KO leaves subjected to ethylene treatment were greater than those between WS and PLDδ-KO leaves without such treatment (Figure 2). These results suggest that ethylene treatment affected lipid degradation, and that PLDδ participated in this lipid degradation during ethylene-promoted senescence.
FIGURE 2

Hierarchical clustering analysis of lipid molecular species during ethylene-promoted senescence. Absolute (nmol/mg dry weight) (left) and relative levels (mol%) of lipid molecular species (right). The color of each bar represents the abundance of the corresponding lipid species. Expression is shown as the relative change from the mean center of each lipid species. Lipid species in the indicated lipid classes were organized using class (as indicated), total acyl carbons (in ascending order within a class), and total double bonds (in ascending order within a class and number of total acyl carbons). Annotation: data of “#” column is from
The Degradation of Plastidic Lipids Occurred before that of Extraplastidic Lipids during Ethylene-promoted Senescence
During ethylene-promoted senescence in WS leaves, the levels of leaf membrane lipids decreased significantly (Table 1). After ethylene treatment for 5 days, we found that the level of total lipids decreased by 68.7%, from 302.20 nmol/mg (non-senescent leaves, NS) to 94.53 nmol/mg (leaves treated with ethylene for 5 days). The levels of PG, PC, PE, DGDG, and MGDG all decreased significantly, but the abundances of PA, PI, and PS remained unchanged. As shown in Table 1, after ethylene-promoted senescence for 3 days, the levels of MGDG and DGDG, two main classes of plastidic lipid, decreased significantly compared with those in untreated leaves, whereas the levels of the main extraplastidic lipids (PC and PE) decreased significantly only after ethylene treatment for 5 days. These findings imply that plastidic lipids might be degraded before extraplastidic lipids.
To compare lipid degradation between plastidic and extraplastidic membranes further, the changes in the levels of molecular species of PG were analyzed. In Arabidopsis, PG includes four molecular species, namely, PG 34:1 (total carbon number:double bond number), 34:2, 34:3, and 34:4 (
Table 2
| PG | Genotypes | Lipids/dry weight (ng/mg) | RC (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0# | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 3 | Day 5 | ||
| 34:1 | WS | 0.65 ± 0.19a | 0.37 ± 0.32ˆab | 0.05 ± 0.06b | -91.7 | |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.69 ± 0.33a | 0.42 ± 0.49ˆab | 0.10 ± 0.14b | -86.0 | ||
| 34:2 | WS | 0.98 ± 0.32a | 0.57 ± 0.36a | 0.18 ± 0.19b | -81.4 | |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.93 ± 0.15a | 0.76 ± 0.41a | 0.24 ± 0.12b | -74.3 | ||
| 34:3 | WS | 2.80 ± 0.17a | 2.69 ± 0.23a | 0.79 ± 0.27c | -71.9 | |
| PLDδ-KO | 3.07 ± 0.47a | 2.97 ± 0.01a | 1.19 ± 0.13b | -61.2 | ||
| 34:4 | WS | 8.18 ± 1.56a | 5.46 ± 1.37b | 1.35 ± 0.62c | -33.3 | -83.6 |
| PLDδ-KO | 7.84 ± 1.67a | 4.66 ± 1.90b | 2.79 ± 1.20b | -40.5 | -64.4 | |
Levels of PG molecular species in leaves of WS and PLDδ-KO plants during ethylene-promoted senescence.
The RC in lipids from day 0 to day 5 is the percentage value for the significant difference between the values at day 0 and day 3 and 5 over the value at day 0. Values in the same lipid molecular species with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Values are means ± SD (n = 5). Annotation: data of “#” column is from
Suppression of PLDδ Attenuated the Decrease in Levels of Plastidic Lipids during Ethylene-promoted Senescence
During ethylene-promoted senescence, the amount of total lipids declined by 50.7% in PLDδ-KO plants (Table 1). Most of this decrease could be attributed to a decrease in plastidic lipids. For example, the level of MGDG in PLDδ-KO leaves decreased by 52.4% (from 217.78 to 103.67 nmol/mg), the level of DGDG decreased by 48.4% (from 31.85 to 16.43 nmol/mg), and the level of PG decreased by 64.0% (from 12.67 to 4.56 nmol/mg). The levels of both total lipids and the main plastidic lipids (MGDG, DGDG) were significantly higher in PLDδ-KO leaves than in WS leaves, whereas no differences in the levels of PC, PE, PI, PA, and PS were detected between the plants with different genotypes (Table 1). Upon further analysis of the content of molecular species of each membrane lipid, we found that the contents of molecular species MGDG 34:2, 34:5, 34:6, and 36:6 as well as DGDG 36:6 in PLDδ-KO detached leaves were much higher than that in WS detached leaves (Table 3). Furthermore, the levels of the plastidic lipids PG 34:4 and 34:3 were higher in PLDδ-KO leaves than that in WS leaves. The extraplastidic lipids PG 34:2 and 34:1 in PLDδ-KO leaves showed no clear difference compared with those in WS leaves (Table 2). The lipids that are largely synthesized and localized in plastids, PG 34:4, MGDG, and DGDG, were previously shown to be the most abundant in leaves (
Table 3
| Galactolipids major lipids species | Genotypes | Lipids/dry weight (nmol/mg) | RC (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 3 | Day 5 | ||
| DGDG 34:6 | WS | 2.51 ± 0.41b | 3.36 ± 0.54a | 1.53 ± 0.59c | 33.9 | -39.0 |
| PLDδ-KO | 2.26 ± 0.61b | 3.29 ± 0.59a | 1.85 ± 0.97bc | 45.6 | - | |
| DGDG 34:5 | WS | 0.36 ± 0.07a | 0.13 ± 0.04b | 0.04 ± 0.02c | -63.9 | -88.9 |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.29 ± 0.07a | 0.15 ± 0.03b | 0.07 ± 0.04c | -48.3 | -75.9 | |
| DGDG 34:3 | WS | 6.47 ± 1.10a | 5.67 ± 2.35a | 2.41 ± 1.07b | - | -62.8 |
| PLDδ-KO | 6.80 ± 1.14a | 7.75 ± 3.67a | 3.15 ± 1.42b | - | -53.7 | |
| DGDG 34:2 | WS | 0.53 ± 0.05a | 0.44 ± 0.23a | 0.18 ± 0.07b | - | -66.0 |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.54 ± 0.16a | 0.65 ± 0.47ˆab | 0.22 ± 0.09b | - | -59.3 | |
| DGDG 36:6 | WS | 19.98 ± 3.17a | 23.60 ± 8.68a | 10.87 ± 2.42c | - | -45.6 |
| PLDδ-KO | 20.26 ± 6.08ˆab | 25.52 ± 5.63a | 16.96 ± 5.05b | - | - | |
| DGDG 36:5 | WS | 0.63 ± 0.11a | 1.06 ± 0.50a | 0.56 ± 0.17a | - | - |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.53 ± 0.17a | 1.14 ± 0.60a | 0.60 ± 0.21a | - | - | |
| MGDG 34:6 | WS | 218.94 ± 43.22a | 139.36 ± 46.31b | 68.55 ± 14.48d | -36.4 | -68.7 |
| PLDδ-KO | 207.77 ± 52.62a | 161.64 ± 33.84b | 90.66 ± 11.24c | -22.2 | -56.4 | |
| MGDG 34:5 | WS | 7.89 ± 1.50a | 1.92 ± 0.86c | 0.26 ± 0.09e | -75.7 | -96.7 |
| PLDδ-KO | 6.76 ± 2.15a | 2.51 ± 1.19b | 0.66 ± 0.05d | -62.9 | -90.2 | |
| MGDG 34:4 | WS | 2.91 ± 0.65a | 1.24 ± 0.48b | 0.22 ± 0.09c | -57.4 | -92.4 |
| PLDδ-KO | 2.90 ± 0.87a | 1.49 ± 0.62b | 0.47 ± 0.27c | -48.6 | -83.8 | |
| MGDG 34:3 | WS | 1.69 ± 0.34a | 1.64 ± 0.71a | 0.62 ± 0.27b | - | -63.3 |
| PLDδ-KO | 1.86 ± 0.66a | 1.93 ± 0.80a | 1.36 ± 0.75ab | - | - | |
| MGDG 34:2 | WS | 0.33 ± 0.08a | 0.22 ± 0.09a | 0.54 ± 0.38a | - | - |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.34 ± 0.11a | 0.25 ± 0.12ˆab | 0.13 ± 0.07b | - | -61.8 | |
| MGDG 36:6 | WS | 22.74 ± 2.93a | 15.79 ± 5.58bc | 5.48 ± 2.33d | -30.6 | -75.9 |
| PLDδ-KO | 23.15 ± 6.14a | 17.90 ± 6.00ab | 9.30 ± 2.69c | - | -59.8 | |
| MGDG 36:5 | WS | 0.68 ± 0.19b | 1.28 ± 0.51a | 0.43 ± 0.15c | 88.2 | -36.8 |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.60 ± 0.17b | 1.31 ± 0.48a | 0.77 ± 0.44ˆabc | 118.3 | - | |
| MGDG 36:4 | WS | 0.42 ± 0.06a | 0.35 ± 0.15a | 0.11 ± 0.04b | - | -73.8 |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.44 ± 0.13a | 0.41 ± 0.18a | 0.20 ± 0.09b | - | -54.6 | |
Levels of major lipid molecular species in leaves of WS and PLDδ-KO plants during ethylene-promoted senescence.
The RC in the levels of lipids from days 0 to 3 and day 5 is the percentage value for the significant difference between the values at day 0 and days 3 and 5 over the value at day 0. Values in the same lipid molecular species with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Values are means ± SD (n = 5).
Changes in the Composition of Lipid Classes during Ethylene-promoted Senescence
For the analysis of the relative contents of membrane lipids, for which the data are expressed as mol% lipids, we found that the most important changes concerned the two galactolipids in WS plants after ethylene treatment for 5 days. The MGDG percentage decreased from 77.55% (NS) to 63.70% (leaves treated with ethylene for 5 days). In contrast, the DGDG percentage increased from 9.70% (NS) to 14.22% (leaves treated with ethylene for 5 days). The PG percentage showed a slight decrease in WS plants. In addition, the relative percentages of the non-chloroplastic PE, PC, PI, and PS, which are mainly located in the membranes of non-photosynthetic organelles such as the plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria (
Table 4
| Lipid class | Genotype | Lipid (mol% of total lipid) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 3 | Day 5 | ||
| PG | WS | 3.92 ± 0.16ab | 3.12 ± 0.72c | 2.78 ± 0.28c |
| PLDδ-KO | 4.23 ± 0.33a | 3.48 ± 0.82bc | 3.15 ± 0.32c | |
| PI | WS | 0.78 ± 0.11c | 1.13 ± 0.09b | 2.03 ± 0.46a |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.82 ± 0.09c | 1.23 ± 0.35ˆab | 1.50 ± 0.38a | |
| PS | WS | 0.11 ± 0.02b | 0.04 ± 0.02c | 0.38 ± 0.13a |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.10 ± 0.05b | 0.21 ± 0.24ˆabc | 0.26 ± 0.01a | |
| PA | WS | 0.02 ± 0.01b | 0.04 ± 0.02b | 0.07 ± 0.02a |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.03 ± 0.01b | 0.03 ± 0.01b | 0.03 ± 0.01b | |
| PC | WS | 4.92 ± 0.55bc | 7.30 ± 2.74ab | 9.72 ± 1.70a |
| PLDδ-KO | 4.78 ± 0.42c | 5.37 ± 0.91b | 8.12 ± 1.79a | |
| PE | WS | 3.04 ± 0.32a | 3.45 ± 0.23a | 4.27 ± 1.14a |
| PLDδ-KO | 2.88 ± 0.26a | 2.68 ± 0.54a | 3.77 ± 1.10a | |
| MGDG | WS | 77.55 ± 1.22a | 70.01 ± 1.86c | 63.70 ± 3.48d |
| PLDδ-KO | 77.39 ± 1.66a | 72.87 ± 1.40b | 69.71 ± 3.18bc | |
| DGDG | WS | 9.70 ± 0.54b | 13.86 ± 1.45a | 14.22 ± 1.67a |
| PLDδ-KO | 10.08 ± 0.52b | 15.36 ± 2.11a | 13.41 ± 0.79a | |
| Lipid ratio | ||||
| PC/PE | WS | 1.61 ± 0.07c | 2.11 ± 0.12b | 1.73 ± 0.14c |
| PLDδ-KO | 1.66 ± 0.04c | 2.24 ± 0.37ab | 2.39 ± 0.18a | |
| DGDG/MGDG | WS | 0.13 ± 0.01c | 0.20 ± 0.03ab | 0.22 ± 0.01a |
| PLDδ-KO | 0.13 ± 0.01c | 0.21 ± 0.03ab | 0.19 ± 0.01b | |
| Galactolipids/Phospholipids | WS | 11.02 ± 1.21a | 9.50 ± 0.71b | 5.41 ± 1.60c |
| PLDδ-KO | 11.24 ± 0.94a | 9.41 ± 1.12b | 6.64 ± 1.24c | |
Leaf membrane lipid composition in each head-group class and lipid ratio in WS and PLDδ-KO plants during ethylene-promoted senescence.
Values in the same lipid molecular species with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Values are means ± SD (n = 5).
The Lower Relative Content of PA and Higher Ratio of PC/PE Might Contribute to the Retardation of Ethylene-promoted Senescence in PLDδ-KO Plant Leaves
To investigate how PLDδ functions in ethylene-promoted senescence, we analyzed the changes in the absolute level and relative content of PA under ethylene treatment in the two genotypes plants leaves. During ethylene-promoted senescence, no significant changes were detected in absolute levels of PA in either WS or PLDδ-KO plants. Upon analysis of the relative content of membrane lipids, we found that the relative content of PA increased 3.5-fold (from 0.02 to 0.07%) in WS plants, but remained unchanged in PLDδ-KO plants, which resulted in the relative content of PA in WS being much higher than that in PLDδ-KO plants after ethylene treatment for 5 days, especially for the molecular species PA 34:3, 36:3, and 36:6 (Tables 1 and 3; Figure 3). PA is a non-bilayer lipid and a potent promoter of the formation of the hexagonal phase and destabilization of the plasma membrane. For further assessment of the cell membrane stabilization of Arabidopsis during ethylene-promoted senescence, we calculated the PC/PE ratio in this process. This ratio in WS plants increased from 1.61 (NS) to 2.11 (leaves treated with ethylene for 3 days), and then decreased to the initial level of 1.73 (leaves treated with ethylene for 5 days). The PC/PE ratio in PLDδ-KO leaves increased constantly in the course of ethylene-promoted senescence, from 1.66 (NS) to 2.39 (leaves treated with ethylene for 5 days). In addition, the ratio of PC/PE in PLDδ-KO detached leaves was much higher than that in WS leaves after ethylene treatment for 5 days, namely, 2.39 and 1.73, respectively (Table 4). Our results indicate that the increase in the relative content of PA promoted destabilization of the plasma membrane; this may have led to the loss of membrane integrity and functions of membrane-associated proteins, thereby promoting senescence. Therefore, a reduction in the relative content of PA in PLDδ-KO leaves may have accounted for the higher ratio of PC/PE, which may have helped to maintain plasma membrane integrity and normal membrane protein function that eventually resulted in the retardation of ethylene-promoted senescence.
FIGURE 3

Changes in the molecular species of PA in WS and PLDδ-KO plants during ethylene-promoted senescence. “∗” indicates that the value is significantly different from that of the WS under the same conditions (p < 0.05). Values are means ± SD (n = 4 or 5).
Discussion
The senescence process takes place in a highly regulated manner and the cell constituents are dismantled via an ordered progression. Senescence affects both the plasma membrane and the intracellular membranes, which results in the loss of ionic and metabolite gradients that are essential for normal cell function (
Both PC and DGDG have relatively large head groups, and tend to form a bilayer lipid phase. By contrast, PE and MGDG have small head groups involved in the formation of a non-bilayer lipid phase (
During senescence, the bulk of membrane phospholipids (i.e., PE, PC) were consumed by PLD, generating copious amounts of PA (
Leaf senescence is accompanied by an early degradation of the cortical MT cytoskeleton in Arabidopsis, and the disruption of the MT network is affected by either repression or induction of microtubule-associated proteins (MAP;
Conclusion
In this study, we have shown that the suppression of PLDδ effectively retarded ethylene-promoted senescence, indicated by higher chlorophyll content and photosynthetic activity, and a lower cell death rate. The profiles of membrane lipids suggested that the suppression of PLDδ attenuates plastidic lipid (PG 34:4, MGDG and DGDG) metabolism, while having no direct effect on the degradation of extraplastidic lipids. No obvious increase in product and decrease in substrate of the PLDδ-catalyzed phospholipid hydrolysis were detected, which indicated that the retardation of ethylene-promoted senescence in PLDδ-KO plants might not be related to the direct role of PLDδ in catalyzing phospholipids, and higher plastidic lipid (PG 34:4, MGDG and DGDG) content and PC/PE ratio in PLDδ-KO plants might contribute to maintenance of membrane integrity and function, and then help to retard senescence.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants from the National Basic Research Program of China (31070262) and the Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China (O97C0211Z1).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BaardsethP.VonelbeJ. H. (1989). Effect of ethylene, free fatty-acid, and some enzyme-systems on chlorophyll degradation.J. Food Sci.541361–1363. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb05993.x
2
BenraisL.AlphaM. J.BahlJ.GuillotsalomonT.DubacqJ. P. (1993). Lipid and protein contents of jojoba leaves in relation to salt adaptation.Plant Physiol. Biochem.31547–557.
3
BonfigK.SchreiberU.GablerA.RoitschT.BergerS. (2006). Infection with virulent and avirulent P. syringae strains differentially affects photosynthesis and sink metabolism in Arabidopsis leaves.Planta2251–12. 10.1007/s00425-006-0303-3
4
BorochovA.SpiegelsteinH.Philosoph-HadasS. (1997). Ethylene and flower petal senescence: interrelationship with membrane lipid catabolism.Physiol. Plant.100606–612. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1000323.x
5
BruceB. D. (1998). The role of lipids in plastid protein transport.Plant Mol. Biol.38223–246. 10.1023/A:1006094308805
6
CheourF.ArulJ.MakhloufJ.WillemotC. (1992). Delay of membrane lipid degradation by calcium treatment during cabbage leaf senescence.Plant Physiol.1001656–1660. 10.1104/pp.100.4.1656
7
CraftsbrandnerS. J.BelowF. E.HarperJ. E.HagemanR. H. (1984). Effects of pod removal on metabolism and senescence of nodulating and nonnodulating soybean isolines.Plant Physiol.75311–317.
8
DevaiahS. P.RothM. R.BaughmanE.LiM.TamuraP.JeannotteR.et al (2006). Quantitative profiling of polar glycerolipid species from organs of wild-type Arabidopsis and a PHOSPHOLIPASE Dα1 knockout mutant.Phytochemistry671907–1924. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.06.005
9
DhonuksheP.LaxaltA. M.GoedhartJ.GadellaT. W.MunnikT. (2003). Phospholipase D activation correlates with microtubule reorganization in living plant cells.Plant Cell152666–2679.
10
DormannP.BenningC. (2002). Galactolipids rule in seed plants.Trends Plant Sci.7112–118. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02216-6
11
DyerJ. H.RyuS. B.WangX. (1994). Multiple forms of phospholipase D following germination and during leaf development of castor bean.Plant Physiol.105715–724.
12
FanL.ZhengS.WangX. (1997). Antisense suppression of phospholipase D alpha retards abscisic acid- and ethylene-promoted senescence of postharvest Arabidopsis leaves.Plant Cell92183–2196. 10.2307/3870578
13
GardinerJ. C.HarperJ. D. I.WeerakoonN. D.CollingsD. A.RitchieS.GilroyS.et al (2001). A 90-kD phospholipase D from tobacco binds to microtubules and the plasma membrane.Plant Cell132143–2158. 10.2307/3871433
14
GrbicV.BleeckerA. B. (1995). Ethylene regulates the timing of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis.Plant J.8595–602. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.8040595.x
15
GuoY.GanS. (2005). Leaf senescence: signals, execution, and regulation.Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.7183–112. 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)71003-6
16
HalevyA. H.PoratR.SpiegelsteinH.BorochovA.BothaL.WhiteheadC. S. (1996). Short-chain saturated fatty acids in the regulation of pollination-induced ethylene sensitivity of Phalaenopsis flowers.Physiol. Plant.97469–474. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00505.x
17
HazelJ. R.WilliamsE. E. (1990). The role of alterations in membrane lipid-composition in enabling physiological adaptation of organisms to their physical-environment.Progr. Lipid Res.29167–227. 10.1016/0163-7827(90)90002-3
18
HeY. H.GanS. S. (2002). A gene encoding an acyl hydrolase is involved in leaf senescence in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell14805–815. 10.1105/tpc.010422
19
JiaY.TaoF.LiW. (2013). Lipid profiling demonstrates that suppressing Arabidopsis phospholipase Dδ retards ABA-promoted leaf senescence by attenuating lipid degradation.PLoS ONE8:e65687. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065687
20
KeechO.PesquetE.GutierrezL.AhadA.BelliniC.SmithS. M.et al (2010). Leaf Senescence is accompanied by an early disruption of the microtubule network in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.1541710–1720. 10.1104/pp.110.163402
21
LiM.HongY.WangX. (2009). Phospholipase D- and phosphatidic acid-mediated signaling in plants.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1791927–935. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.02.017
22
LiW.LiM.ZhangW.WeltiR.WangX. (2004). The plasma membrane-bound phospholipase D delta enhances freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.Nat. Biotechnol.22427–433. 10.1038/nbt949
23
LiW.WangR.LiM.LiL.WangC.WeltiR.et al (2008). Differential degradation of extraplastidic and plastidic lipids during freezing and post-freezing recovery in Arabidopsis thaliana.J. Biol. Chem.283461–468. 10.1074/jbc.M706692200
24
LimP. O.KimH. J.NamH. G. (2007). Leaf senescence.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.58115–136. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316
25
MarechalE.BlockM. A.DorneA. J.JoyardJ. (1997). Lipid synthesis and metabolism in the plastid envelope.Physiol. Plant.10065–77. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1000106.x
26
MishraS.ShankerS.SangwanR. S. (1998). Lipid profile in relation to tropane alkaloid production and accumulation during leaf growth and senescence in Duboisia myoporoides.Fitoterapia6965–72.
27
MunnikT. (2001). Phosphatidic acid: an emerging plant lipid second messenger.Trends Plant Sci.6227–233. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)01918-5
28
MunnikT.MusgraveA. (2001). Phospholipid signaling in plants: holding On to Phospholipase D.Sci. Signal.2001:pe42.
29
QinC.WangX. (2002). The Arabidopsis phospholipase D family. Characterization of a calcium-independent and phosphatidylcholine-selective PLD zeta 1 with distinct regulatory domains.Plant physiol.1281057–1068.
30
ReaG.de PintoM. C.TavazzaR.BiondiS.GobbiV.FerranteP.et al (2004). Ectopic expression of maize polyamine oxidase and pea copper amine oxidase in the cell wall of tobacco plants.Plant Physiol.1341414–1426. 10.1104/pp.103.036764
31
Siefermann-HarmsD.NinnemannH.YamamotoH. Y. (1987). Reassembly of solubilized chlorophyll-protein complexes in proteolipid particles — Comparison of monogalactosyldiacylglycerol and two phospholipids.Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerget.892303–313. 10.1016/0005-2728(87)90234-9
32
SinghH.PrivettO. S. (1970). Studies on the glycolipids and phospholipids of immature soybeans.Lipids5692–697. 10.1007/BF02531436
33
SuttleJ. C.KendeH. (1980). Ethylene action and loss of membrane integrity during petal senescence in Tradescantia.Plant Physiol.651067–1072. 10.1104/pp.65.6.1067
34
ThompsonJ.TaylorC.WangT. W. (2000). Altered membrane lipase expression delays leaf senescence.Biochem. Soc. Trans.28775–777. 10.1042/bst0280775
35
ThompsonJ. E.FroeseC. D.MadeyE.SmithM. D.HongY. (1998). Lipid metabolism during plant senescence.Prog. Lipid Res.37119–141. 10.1016/S0163-7827(98)00006-X
36
ThompsonJ. E.MayakS.ShinitzkyM.HalevyA. H. (1982). Acceleration of membrane senescence in cut carnation flowers by treatment with ethylene.Plant Physiol.69859–863. 10.1104/pp.69.4.859
37
WangC.WangX. (2001). A novel phospholipase D of Arabidopsis that is activated by oleic acid and associated with the plasma membrane.Plant Physiol.1271102–1112. 10.1104/pp.010444
38
WannerL.KellerF.MatileP. (1991). Metabolism of radiolabeled galactolipids in senescent barley leaves.Plant Sci.78199–206. 10.1016/0168-9452(91)90199-I
39
WeltiR.LiW.LiM.SangY.BiesiadaH.ZhouH. E.et al (2002). Profiling membrane lipids in plant stress responses. Role of phospholipase D alpha in freezing-induced lipid changes in Arabidopsis.J. Biol. Chem.27731994–32002.
40
WoolhouseH. W. (1984). The biochemistry and regulation of senescence in chloroplasts.Can. J. Bot.622934–2942. 10.1139/b84-392
41
ZhangQ.LinF.MaoT.NieJ.YanM.YuanM.et al (2012). Phosphatidic acid regulates microtubule organization by interacting with MAP65-1 in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell244555–4576. 10.1105/tpc.112.104182
42
ZhangW.WangC.QinC.WoodT.OlafsdottirG.WeltiR.et al (2003). The oleate-stimulated phospholipase D, PLDδ, and phosphatidic acid decrease H2O2-induced cell death inArabidopsis. Plant Cell152285–2295.
Summary
Keywords
Arabidopsis leaf senescence, ethylene, lipidomics, membrane lipids, phospholipase Dδ
Citation
Jia Y and Li W (2015) Characterisation of Lipid Changes in Ethylene-Promoted Senescence and Its Retardation by Suppression of Phospholipase Dδ in Arabidopsis Leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1045. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01045
Received
11 August 2015
Accepted
09 November 2015
Published
30 November 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited by
Olivier Lamotte, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
Reviewed by
Maoyin John Li, University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA; Jean-luc Cacas, AgroParisTech, France
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Jia and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Weiqi Li, weiqili@mail.kib.ac.cn
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.