Skip to main content


Front. Plant Sci., 26 November 2015
Sec. Plant Breeding

Association Mapping in Scandinavian Winter Wheat for Yield, Plant Height, and Traits Important for Second-Generation Bioethanol Production

  • Plant and Soil Section, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark

A collection of 100 wheat varieties representing more than 100 years of wheat-breeding history in Scandinavia was established in order to identify marker-trait associations for plant height (PH), grain yield (GY), and biomass potential for bioethanol production. The field-grown material showed variations in PH from 54 to 122 cm and in GY from 2 to 6.61 t ha-1. The release of monomeric sugars was determined by high-throughput enzymatic treatment of ligno-cellulosic material and varied between 0.169 and 0.312 g/g dm for glucose (GLU) and 0.146 and 0.283 g/g dm for xylose (XYL). As expected, PH and GY showed to be highly influenced by genetic factors with repeatability (R) equal to 0.75 and 0.53, respectively, while this was reduced for GLU and XYL (R = 0.09 for both). The study of trait correlations showed how old, low-yielding, tall varieties released higher amounts of monomeric sugars after straw enzymatic hydrolysis, showing reduced recalcitrance to bioconversion compared to modern varieties. Ninety-three lines from the collection were genotyped with the DArTseq® genotypic platform and 5525 markers were used for genome-wide association mapping. Six quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for GY, PH, and GLU released from straw were mapped. One QTL for PH was previously reported, while the remaining QTLs constituted new genomic regions linked to trait variation. This paper is one of the first studies in wheat to identify QTLs that are important for bioethanol production based on a genome-wide association approach.


Second-generation bioethanol production based on ligno-cellulosic material from agricultural waste and plant residues is not undertaken specifically for the purposes of bioenergy, and therefore has the potential to bypass the food–feed–fuel dilemma which is an inherent problem with other kinds of bioenergy (Oladosu and Msangi, 2013). With an estimated annual production in Europe of 74 million tons (Kretschmer et al., 2012), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw is the crop residue with the greatest potential to be a feedstock for second-generation biofuels available in Europe (Scarlat et al., 2010). If the straw is used for bioenergy, wheat can be regarded as a dual-purpose crop, providing grains for food and feed and remaining biomass for energy. Then, it would be desirable to increase straw production without compromising grain yield (GY). However, it is also advantageous to have straw that is easy to convert, as this is more efficient and requires fewer inputs for transformation. Therefore, another target would be to develop wheat varieties with straw that is less recalcitrant for bioconversion. This could require alterations in the lignin and secondary cell wall composition. The biosynthesis of monolignols is well known and several examples of genetic modification by targeting single genes have been pursued in model and crop plant species (Sibout et al., 2005; Chen and Dixon, 2007; Fu et al., 2011), but not for wheat as a crop. For secondary cell wall biosynthesis, knowledge is more fragmented and crop specific details are scarce or missing. A meta-analysis of 150 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for cell wall composition identified in 11 maize mapping populations resulted in 42 mQTL, showing many genes influencing the cell wall that are stable across varieties and environments (Truntzler et al., 2010).

Plant height (PH) is one of the most studied phenotypes in wheat due to its involvement in plant architecture and ultimately in GY. In fact, height is also closely related to recalcitrance, because shorter straw tends to have a more easily degradable leaf mass in relation to stem mass (Jensen et al., 2011). The best-known PH genes are the semi-dwarfing loci Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 on group 4 chromosomes, conferring insensitivity to the phytohormone gibberellin (Flintham et al., 1997). Other major genes conferring reduced height are Rht8 on 2D (Korzun et al., 1998) and the photoperiod regulator Ppd-1 (Shaw et al., 2012). Yet several other QTLs were reported to affect PH. Griffiths et al. (2012) highlighted 16 mQTLs causing modification in PH in a meta-QTL study of four double-haploid populations. Furthermore, a recent study from Zanke et al. (2014) employing the newly available 90K iSelect wheat chip and 732 SSR markers in a genome wide association study (GWAS) of 358 European winter wheat varieties reported 280 significant markers spread over the entire wheat genome, suggesting that a wide range of loci are available to breeders for modulating PH in wheat. Like PH, GY is a complex trait regulated by a plethora of interlinked metabolic networks, including heading date, photoperiod sensitivity, number of tillers, carbohydrate remobilisation, and nutrient-use efficiency, to mention some of the traits that have a downstream effect on crop yield. Several GWA studies highlighted QTLs spread throughout the wheat genome, including the aforementioned reduced height genes (Bentley et al., 2014; Bordes et al., 2014). However, trait variation was relatively small when allele frequencies were considered.

A few studies have used GWA mapping to identify genes involved in secondary cell wall metabolism (Wang et al., 2013; Rincent et al., 2014; Ramstein et al., 2015), but not in wheat. However, promising results in terms of genetic variation for traits such as enzymatic digestibility of straw (Jensen et al., 2011) and sugar release upon pre-treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis (Lindedam et al., 2012) in collections of wheat varieties were reported. This paper presents the results of a GWA study on a collection of historical Scandinavian winter wheat varieties released onto the market over a period of more than a century, allowing a wide range of genetic variations to be explored. Traits included in the study were GY, PH and monomeric sugars released after straw enzymatic hydrolysis, relevant for second-generation bioethanol production. It was possible to detect previously reported QTLs and highlight additional genetic regions of interest for the traits investigated.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Field Trials

A collection of 100 accessions of hexaploid winter wheat (T. aestivum L.) – 32 from Denmark, 66 from Sweden and two from Great Britain – released between 1900 and 2006 was grown in a field trial in 2008 in Tåstrup (55.67°N; 12.30°E), Denmark (Supplementary Table S1). The collection was intended to represent the history of more than a century of wheat breeding in the Scandinavian region. The two accessions originating from Great Britain were modern commercially available varieties currently grown in the Scandinavian area. Seeds were obtained from NordGen (Nordic Genetic Resources Centre, Alnarp, Sweden). Information regarding the accessions (e.g., pedigree, year of release, country of origin) was retrieved from the SESTO database1 developed by NordGen and integrated with data available from the WheatPedigree database2 The year of release was not available for six accessions. Except for three accessions classified as landrace, the rest of the collection consisted of commercial varieties. The experiment was conducted in two completely randomized blocks using standard agricultural practices for the area. All the 100 lines were present in the two blocks thus each line was tested with two biological replicates. PH was measured for ten plants from each plot before harvesting as the distance from the soil to the base of the spike, and the data recorded averaged. Harvesting was carried out using an experimental combine harvester that separated and collected whole plot grain and straw. GY was recorded on site and reported as wet matter tons per ha-1. Ligno-cellulosic biomass glucose (GLU), xylose (XYL) yields and total sugars (TS = GLU + XYL) were obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis of grain-free plant material from each plot and quantified using the NREL method, as previously described in Bekiaris et al. (2015).

Field Trial Statistical Analysis

Initially, the lme4 package (Bates et al., 2014) based on the statistical platform R (The R Core Team, 2014) was used to develop a linear mixed model to obtain the genotypes’ best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) for each trait recorded. The model was expressed as Y ij = μ + gi + bj + eij, where μ represents the grand mean, g the random effect of the ith genotype, b the random effect of the jth block and eij the residual error ∼ N(0, σ2). Trait repeatability (an estimate of genetic influence on a trait similar to trait heritability) was then calculated as: R=σg2/(σg2+σe2), where σg2 stands for total genetic variance and σe2 the residual variance. Subsequently the R package mvngGrAd was employed to correct raw data for spatial field variation (Technow, 2014). The package uses the spatial position of each plot in the field, defined by row and column number, to adjust phenotypic values. When a plot is considered, the package calculates the mean phenotypic value of the surrounding plots, with the diagram for the surrounding plots as in Lado et al. (2013). The calculated value represents the growing conditions of the plot considered and is used as a covariate to adjust the observed phenotypic value. The formula describing the spatial adjustment is defined as pi_adj = pi_obs - b(xi - x), where pi_adj is the adjusted phenotypic entry, pi_obs is the observed phenotypic data, xi is the mean of the surrounding plots, x is the mean of all xi, and b is the regression coefficient in the general linear model pi_obs = a + bxi. TS was recalculated based on the adjusted values for the two sugars. A second mixed linear model following the formula Y ij_adj = μ + gi + eij expressed above, employing a field-corrected dataset, was used to recalculate accession BLUPs and trait R. The model giving better trait repeatability values was retained for further analyses. BLUPs were also used to calculate Pearson’s correlation between traits using the cor.prob function implemented in the R statistical platform.

Genotyping and Marker Selection

Genomic DNA from 93 of the varieties employed in the field trial was extracted from two leaves of seedlings grown in controlled conditions using the hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (Rogers and Bendich, 1985), with further modifications as described by Orabi et al. (2014). DNA samples were sent to Diversity Array Technology Pty Ltd (Canberra, Australia3) for genotyping with the wheat DArTseq® platform that consists of two different sets of markers: (i) genotyping by sequencing (GBS) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers obtained by sequencing the fragments derived from genome complexity reduction and subsequent SNP calling, and (ii) presence/absence variation (PAV) DArT markers referring to whether or not a defined sequenced DNA fragment was obtained after genome enzymatic digestion. Genomic sequences of fragments from both types were also available. A detailed description of the platform used to genotype the collection can be found in literature (Kilian et al., 2012). The genotyping process did not include seven wheat accessions present in the field trial. Thus all the following analyses described here were performed on a reduced dataset including 93 lines. For details on the lines genotyped, see Supplementary Table S1. Since it was assumed that all the accessions derived from completely homozygous genotypes, SNPs showing heterozygous alleles due to the detection of multiple loci were noted as missing and then markers with >10% missing data were removed. Subsequently markers were assigned to a genetic location based on the consensus map developed by Li et al. (2015). It should be noted that the consensus map contained several recombination deserts lacking polymorphic markers. Thus chromosomes 1B, 2A, 2D, 3B, 4A, 6A, 7A, and 7B were represented by two linkage groups in the consensus map (in this study all markers on 2D mapped to only one of the groups in the consensus map). For these chromosomes, markers in the two linkage groups physically located on the same chromosome appeared unlinked, thus it was not possible to assign relative positions to the two groups. This was taken into account during further analysis. Markers were recoded as binary based on minor allele frequency (MAF) and missing genotype data were imputed using the R package scrime (Schwender, 2012), based on the five weighted nearest varieties present in the dataset. Markers with MAF below 5% were eventually removed.

Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis, Population Structure, and GWAS

Average intra-chromosomal linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay was calculated using TASSEL v. 3.0.169 (Bradbury et al., 2007). Given the different nature of the two sets of markers, calculations were run separately for SNPs and PAVs. As reported by Li et al. (2015), the consensus map used here was created based on three crosses sharing the common parent PBW343. This variety, popular in South Asia, is known to harbor the 1B/1R translocation. According to the WheatPedigree database4, three varieties in the collection studied here possessed the translocation. In order to avoid any distortion in results, average interchromosomal LD decay was not calculated for chromosome 1B. Finally, chromosomes containing a recombination desert, thus constituted by two different linkage groups, were considered as separate chromosomes. Pairwise marker r2 estimates of LD were calculated and results below a significance threshold of p < 0.05 were discarded. r2-values were subsequently plotted against the distance in cM between the pairs of markers considered. To establish a threshold for LD decay, the 95th percentile of r2-values for unlinked markers (i.e., markers more than 50 cM apart) was calculated (Zhou et al., 2012), then a second-degree smoothed curve for the data points was fitted using the R program (The R Core Team, 2014). The projection of the interception between the fitted curve and the LD decay threshold onto the x-axis was assumed to determine the average chromosomal LD extent in the population considered. Chromosome 1B was analyzed separately to verify the presence of additional varieties with the rye translocation. Since the 1B consensus map was constituted by two linkage groups covering approximately 165 and 65 cM, and in consideration of long-range LD being expected as a consequence of the translocation, only markers mapped to the longest linkage group of 1B were considered. Principal components analysis (PCA) was performed on 531 PAVs, which constituted 85% of the total available genotypic information for the linkage group. Population stratification present in the collection was studied using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) implemented in the R package ape (Popescu et al., 2012). Finally, GWAS was performed to identify positive marker-trait associations (MTA) for the five traits included in the study using the R package GAPIT (Lipka et al., 2012). BLUPs obtained from the field trial for the 93 genotyped varieties were employed as a phenotypic data to perform the association mapping study. Three principal components were employed to control for population structure and an EMMA uncompressed kinship matrix to account for cryptic relatedness. For convenience, chromosomes constituted by markers separated into two linkage groups were considered to be contiguous since this did not affect the final results. GWAS was also performed using TASSEL v. 5.2.15 (Bradbury et al., 2007) using the MLM function. This was done in order to confirm results obtain with GAPIT. Similar parameters to correct for population structure were used, i.e., three PCs as fixed effect and a kinship matrix as random effect calculated with the scaled Identity by State (IBS) method (Endelman and Jannink, 2012).


Phenotypic Data

A summary of raw and adjusted-by-field effects on five traits recorded on the 100 historical winter wheat varieties is reported in Table 1. A wide range of values was observed for PH (field-adjusted data: 54–122 cm) and GY (field-adjusted data: 2.06–6.61 t ha-1), while conversion of ligno-cellulosic biomass into monomeric sugars showed less variation. The effect of spatial adjustment could be observed in particular for the PH and GY coefficient of variation %, which was reduced from 18.17 and 24.08 to 16.14 and 18.24, respectively. A comparison of calculated trait repeatability (R) showed how values improved when the field spatial variation correction was applied, except for GLU yield where no effect was observed. Thus, field-adjusted phenotypic data were used to calculate BLUPs and correlation coefficients. Repeatability estimates for the five traits recorded showed that PH and GY had the highest values, at 0.75 and 0.53, respectively, while traits related to biomass conversion, GLU, XYL, and TS, showed low repeatability at 0.09, 0.09, and 0.11, respectively. Pearson’s correlation (Table 2) between traits revealed a negative correlation between PH and GY (r = –0.36, P < 0.001) and a strong correlation between GLU and XYL (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). Moreover, sugar yield was moderately positively correlated with PH. The values observed were 0.24, 0.25, and 0.28∗∗ for GLU, XYL and TS, respectively. GY was also negatively correlated with GLU and TS (r = –0.40, P < 0.001 and r = –0.27, P < 0.01, respectively).


TABLE 1. Summary statistics and trait repeatability estimates for the phenotypes recorded.


TABLE 2. Pearson’s correlations between genotype best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs; n = 100).

Genotypic Data

Genotyping the historic Scandinavian wheat collection with the DArTseq platform resulted in an initial dataset comprising 38131 markers (12083 SNPs and 26048 PAVs). After filtering for markers with >10% missing data points, 18484 markers (4624 SNPs, 13824 PAVs) remained available. The consensus map for the DArTseq platform consisted of 28646 markers. Based on marker ID it was possible to map 6104 markers (21.3%), including 4675 PAVs and 1429 SNPs. Final filtering for MAF <5% resulted in 5525 markers used for further analysis. Their chromosomal distribution can be found in Table 3. The total map length covered was 3217.02 cM. The D genome was confirmed to be the least polymorphic, with only 756 markers covering 351.58 cM, while the B genome presented the highest number of markers. Within the linkage groups, 1D and 7D presented the biggest gaps between markers at 47.76 and 42.81 cM, respectively.


TABLE 3. Descriptive data of the 5525 markers used in this study.

Linkage Disequilibrium and Population Structure

In the present collection of wheat varieties, LD was analyzed by calculating pairwise marker r2 for each chromosome. A total of 231033 r2-values (217923 for PAVs and 13110 for SNPs) were below the significance threshold (p < 0.05) and employed for the analysis. Of these, 56344 (∼24%) concerned markers that were considered unlinked, i.e., more than 50 cM apart. The r2 threshold for considering pairs of markers to be in LD or not was determined to be 0.27 for PAVs and 0.30 for SNPs. The second-degree smoothed loess curve calculated fell below the critical r2-value at 20.59 and 9.51 cM for PAVs and SNPs, respectively (Figure 1). These values were considered as the average extent of LDs for this wheat collection. PCA analysis on PAVs mapped on the 1B linkage group revealed a separation of lines according to PC1 based on the presence or absence of the 1B/1R translocation from rye (Figure 2). SNPs were not included given the different LD decay pattern shown between the two sets of markers. In the collection, only three varieties (“Sleipner,” “Lone,” and “Tjelvar”) were previously reported to harbor such translocation. These lines were characterized by positive values on the first PC, which represented almost half of the total variance. Based on this criterion, four additional lines showing a similar clustering pattern were detected as carrying the rye translocation. These lines were “Brandt,” “Probat,” “Galicia,” and “Kirsten” for which rye translocation had not previously been reported. Although known to carry the translocation, the “Tjelvar” variety was not located as far from the remaining genotypes on the score plot as the other six 1B/1R lines.


FIGURE 1. Intra-chromosomal linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay in the historical Scandinavian winter wheat collection separated for type of marker. Markers on chromosome 1B were omitted from calculations. r2-values of LD are plotted as a function of the distance between pairs of markers considered. Blue line: r2-values of the 95th percentile for unlinked (>50 cM) markers. Red line: second-degree smoothed loess curve.


FIGURE 2. Principal component analysis for PAVs on 1B linkage group 1. Red circles: lines presenting 1B/1R translocation; black circles: remaining lines.

A study of the population structure using PCoA confirmed the 1B/1R translocation as a source of stratification (Figure 3). An analysis of the PCoA plot revealed a second group consisting of modern wheat varieties and an additional group constituted by landraces together with some old and modern varieties without any apparent differentiation according to year of release.


FIGURE 3. Principal coordinate analysis of population structure using genotypic data. Red circles: lines presenting 1B/1R translocation; green circles: cluster of modern varieties; black circles: remaining lines not showing a specific clustering pattern.

Genome-wide Association Analysis for Agronomical Traits and Ligno-cellulosic Sugar Released

A summary of the results of the GWAS obtained using GAPIT is presented in Table 4 and manhattan plots are given in Figure 4. None of the associations detected was significant when the false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted p-values were considered. Thus, it was decided to arbitrarily consider as significant any MTA with –log10(p-value) > 3 as in Houston et al. (2014). GWAS performed with TASSEL v. 5.2.15 confirmed the results from GAPIT with neglectable differences in significance p values (data not shown). No additional markers were detected as significant for the chosen –log10(p-value) threshold. For GY only one PAV marker was significant, located at 162.6 cM on 2B. For PH, GWAS detected ten MTAs. Of these, seven seem to detect a single QTL located on 6A between 1.14 and 4.89 cM. The remaining MTAs for PH were located on 2A (34.86 cM), 6A (121.14 cM), and 7B (linkage group 2, 55.61 cM). For sugar release, GWAS on the GLU trait showed one significant MTA at 52.52 cM on chromosome 1B (linkage group 1). The other sugar trait studied (XYL and TS) did not show any significant association with any marker. For the most significant MTA for PH on 6A at 121.14 cM, genotypes with the minor allele for PAV-1143111 were on average 25 cm shorter than genotypes with the major allele. Varieties possessing the height-reducing minor allele were mostly released onto the market in the 1990s. The remaining trait variation (PY, PH, and GLU) based on allele frequency for the QTL identified is reported in Figure 5.


TABLE 4. Summary results of genome wide association study (GWAS).


FIGURE 4. Manhattan plots for genome wide association study (GWAS) of GY (grain yield), PH (plant height), and GLU (glucose released after enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass). On the x-axis the A, B, and D genomes are in red, green, and blue, respectively. Different color tones correspond to different chromosomes within the same genome from 1 to 7. Chromosomes containing two linkage groups are represented by vertical dotted lines separating them. The dashed horizontal line indicates the significant threshold at –log10(p-value) = 3.


FIGURE 5. Boxplot of trait variation for genotypes showing different alleles at significant markers. For plant height QTL on 6A between 1.14 and 4.89 cM, only the most significant marker out of seven (SNP 1090816) is shown.


Field Trial

From the analysis of the 100 historical winter wheat varieties, it was clear that grain production and PH were changing in response to the varieties’ year of release, while the amount of sugars obtained after pre-treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of straw was much less affected. Indeed, spatial adjustment for variation in growth conditions improved the model’s accuracy and subsequently the repeatability estimates. Lado et al. (2013) reported similar improved heritability results using the same R-based package mvngGrAd, based on an extensive hexaploid wheat field trial study. The necessity of correction for spatial effects in field trials has been extensively discussed in a study of sorghum and for plant breeding in general (Piepho et al., 2008; Leiser et al., 2012). Other approaches have been suggested to improve output precision from field trial mixed models. Designing field experiments to control for environmental effects has always been an issue in breeding programmes for evaluating genotypes. The advantage of the approach used here is the possibility of reducing unwanted effects due to field heterogeneity after the field tests have been performed without having knowledge a priori of the sources of non-genetic variation.

As expected, GY and PH were the traits with the highest values of repeatability, as these traits are known to be highly influenced by genetic factors. Trait repeatability reported here for PH (0.60 and 0.75 adj, in Table 1) was comparable with that reported by Jia et al. (2013) for a population of wheat RIL (recombinant inbred lines) grown in four environments in China (H = 0.65) and the heritability estimate of 0.85 obtained by Wurschum et al. (2015) in the analysis of a collection of European winter wheat varieties. Similarly, GY repeatability (R = 0.53, Table 1) was within the range of what reported in analogous studies (Guo et al., 2015; Sukumaran et al., 2015). As expected, GY and PH were also negatively correlated as a consequence of the introduction of semi-dwarf varieties starting from 1970s and 1980s and guaranteeing higher production (Donmez et al., 2001; Shearman et al., 2005).

With regard to the traits related to second-generation bioethanol production, the results presented here showed a trend of general low repeatability estimates. In comparison, Lindedam et al. (2012) reported relatively higher heritability for wheat straw conversion of 37, 71, and 57% for C6 and C5 carbohydrates and total sugars, respectively, in a study of 20 modern wheat varieties grown in one year at two locations. In another study, Jensen et al. (2011) found a heritability of 29% for ruminant digestibility, which is also relatively high. In contrast, Larsen et al. (2012) found no significant phenotypic variation between modern cultivars in terms of sugar release upon pre-treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. The low repeatability for sugars released reported here was, however, not completely surprising. Plant cell wall composition and bioconversion properties are known to be highly influenced by external factors as growing conditions (Gall et al., 2015). The study of the correlation between GLU and XYL released highlighted the presence of a general recalcitrance to saccharification but the low variance captured as genotypic effect would discourage the design of breeding programmes to improve carbohydrate yield for bioethanol production.

The positive correlation observed between GLU and XYL with PH as well as the negative correlation between GLU and GY led to speculation that an increase in recalcitrance occurred in modern winter wheat varieties compared to old ones. In contrast a recent study of 106 winter wheat varieties from two growing sites in Denmark, reported straw digestibility as being negatively correlated with PH (–0.36 and –0.22 for the two sites, respectively; Jensen et al., 2011). This was explained by the fact that leaves, that are more digestible, constitute a larger fraction of the straw of short-stem phenotypes. Lindedam et al. (2012) instead observed a positive correlation between PH and straw conversion as reported here and concluded that the quality of the stem, leaf and ears was more relevant for conversion than the ratio between plant anatomical parts. In those studies the varieties investigated were all relatively modern varieties. In the wheat collection analyzed in the present study a larger variation in PH was observed and therefore clear correlations between PH and sugar conversion should be expected. Additional studies, including multiple growing conditions should allow a better determination of genotype influence on cell wall related traits and shed light on the relationship between PH and plant cell wall recalcitrance.

Genotypic Platform, LD, and Population Structure

The DArTSeq® platform employed here to genotype the winter wheat collection was confirmed as an efficient tool for GWA scans and QTL mapping studies. Given the availability of a dense consensus map (Li et al., 2015), it was possible to map 5525 markers with a total map length of 3217 cM, comparable to the POPSEQ map develop by the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (Mayer et al., 2014). Despite the recent introduction of new genotypic platforms for wheat, e.g., the 90 k and the 9 k SNPs chip (Cavanagh et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014), the DArTseq platform still maintains some advantages for genetic profiling: it is cheap, does not require prior information of the target genome and, after the recent establishment of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, the platform has become an extremely high-throughput technology.

Study of LD is a prerequisite for evaluating a collection of genotypes, determining marker density needed for GWA study and defining genomic regions in the search for candidate genes related to the trait studied once marker-trait associations have been identified. Average inter-chromosomal LD decay was determined to be ∼20 cM for PAVs, which is in agreement with the report by Nielsen et al. (2014) using the previous version of the DArT platform to study a collection of European bread wheat genotypes. The values of LD decay reported here showed how the dominant PAV exhibited approximately twice the LD extent compared to the co-dominant SNP markers. This confirmed how a relatively smaller number of PAV markers are required to cover the entire wheat genome compared to SNP markers, known to exhibit more rapid LD decay, although both were equally distributed over the entire genome.

The study of population structure prior to GWA mapping revealed a moderate level of stratification in the collection, partly due to the presence of a group of lines carrying the rye translocation on chromosome 1B and partly due to a cluster of modern varieties. Similar results of moderate population stratification were reported elsewhere (Lopes et al., 2015; Naruoka et al., 2015) studying different collections of winter wheat.

QTLs for Plant Height and Grain Yield

To identify QTLs involved in the regulation of the phenotypic traits analyzed here, a genome-wide association approach was employed. It was, however, not possible to identify significant associations when FDR correction was applied. This was probably due to the reduced number of varieties considered for the GWAS. Subsequently we choose an arbitrary significant threshold at –log10(p) > 3 (Gurung et al., 2014; Houston et al., 2014; Shu and Rasmussen, 2014). This resulted in the identification of a total of 12 significant MTAs involved in three out of the five traits considered. PH was the one producing the majority of positive results, with 10 MTAs on chromosomes 2A, 6A, and 7B. PH is one of the most studied phenotypes in wheat due to its involvement in plant architecture and ultimately in GY. Along with semi-dwarfing genes several other QTLs are reported to affect PH. Among the many significant markers associated with PH reported by Zanke et al. (2014) studying a collection of European winter wheat varieties, a significant MTA was detected using SSR on 6A at a similar position to that found here (∼93.5 cM). Additionally, in a recently published study, Wurschum et al. (2015) examined the genetic control of PH in a European winter collection, including genotypes from the Scandinavian area, employing the DArTseq® platform also used here. A major QTL was detected on 6A (clone ID 1066954), reported to be located at 94.8 cM. In the consensus map utilized for the current study, the same clone was mapped at 121.14 and although that particular marker was not present here, a different marker (clone ID 1143111) was reported mapping at the same position, leading to the conclusion that the two major QTLs coincided. Interestingly no QTLs were highlighted on chromosomes known to harbor the dwarfing genes Rht-D1, Rht-B1, Rht8, and the Ppd-D1. This could be due to the limited number of accessions considered, which may have influenced the results from GWAS, or the lack of markers covering the genomic regions of interest, in particular for the D genome which was poorly covered. Moreover, since to some extent population structure was related to the year of release and PH was significantly correlated with the year of release, a correction for population structure during GWAS could have reduced the effect of markers in LD with major dwarfing genes, as observed in a study of maize (Larsson et al., 2013). Wurschum et al. (2015) reported the almost complete absence of the Rht-B1 dwarfing allele for 42 varieties from Denmark, while the majority carried the short allele for Rht-D1. Indeed, the lack of major dwarfing genes in the collection cannot be excluded, nor their limited presence, which could have remained undetected given the parameters applied for marker filtering and the reduced number of lines included in the study.

Like PH, GY is an extremely complex trait regulated by a number of metabolic networks. Many traits have a downstream effect on crop yield. Several GWA studies highlighted QTLs spread throughout the whole genome, including the aforementioned reduced height genes (Bentley et al., 2014; Bordes et al., 2014). However, trait variation was relatively small when allele frequencies were considered. Wheat chromosome 2B is known to harbor the photoperiod insensitivity gene Ppd-B1 (Beales et al., 2007), influencing heading time, tiller number, PH, and spikelet number, although the effects appeared less pronounced compared to Ppd-D1 on chromosome 2D (Kamran et al., 2014). The genomic sequence of Ppd-B1 was retrieved from the NCBI database5 (ID: DQ885757) and a BLAST program was run on the wheat genome assembly in the Ensembl database6 The best hit was located on 2B at ∼17.8 Mbp (ID: 100%; E-val:0.0). Subsequently a BLAST program was run on the DNA sequence of the significant marker identified for GY, PAV-1218507, provided by Li et al. (2015). The best hit was located on 2B, but at ∼293 Mbp (ID: 100, E-val: 4.4E-24), making the presence of strong LD between Ppd-B1 and the significant marker identified highly unlikely. Despite the high trait repeatability observed here for GY, it is possible that the reduced number of genotypes considered hampered the possibilities of QTL detection.

GWAS for Biomass Conversion to Bioethanol

One of the main objectives of the present study was to verify the viability of a GWA scan to identify QTLs involved in the production of second-generation biofuel. To do this, a collection of winter wheat varieties was tested in the field and the harvested ligno-cellulosic biomass phenotyped for monomeric sugars released after enzymatic hydrolysis. Repeatability for these traits was low, suggesting difficulties in identifying genetic effects given the high influence of environmental factors. In fact, a single marker trait association was reported for GLU released after biomass enzymatic hydrolysis. No MTAs were detected for XYL or total sugars released. For the GLU released, the low level of significance and low difference in trait values observed between the two allele classes necessitate further studies to confirm their validity. Furthermore, as pointed out by Oakey et al. (2013), large-scale phenotyping experiments on such traits would need advanced statistical data modeling to remove errors due to variables such as environmental factors and laboratory batch effects. In the aforementioned paper, trait heritability increased from values comparable to those reported here to up to h2= 0.50, when the optimal model was tested. A higher number of varieties as well as a multi-environment field trial could have improved the overall detected genotypic effect and subsequent GWAS results. However, this study is one of the first on plants aimed at identifying QTLs involved in biofuel production. Given the limited number of scientific publications using GWA mapping to identify genes involved in secondary cell wall metabolism (Wang et al., 2013; Rincent et al., 2014; Ramstein et al., 2015), it is clear that different approaches have so far been taken to identify such major genes. Up to now, bioinformatic techniques coupled with comparative genomics, gene silencing and plant transformation have yielded most of the knowledge about plant cell wall biosynthesis toward the production of crops with reduced biomass recalcitrance (Chen and Dixon, 2007; Sumiyoshi et al., 2013; Sundin et al., 2014). However, given the complexity of plant cell wall structures, it is necessary to study cereal crops at field scale (Alexandersson et al., 2014). Thus, field trials and genome-wide association mapping are important strategies when aiming to improve sugar yield for biofuel production. Temperate cereals such as wheat and barley are characterized by complex large genomes and draft sequences have only been released in recent years (Mayer et al., 2011, 2014). With constant advances in genotypic platforms and statistical tools for data analysis, an increased amount of knowledge regarding the complex gene networks involved in plant cell wall deposition can be anticipated.


In this study, a collection of winter wheat representing more than a century of breeding efforts in the Scandinavian area was analyzed. The genetic material was tested in a single field trial, recording agronomically relevant traits such as yield and PH as well as traits related to second-generation biofuel production. The results showed reduced biomass recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis of old varieties compared to new ones, and overall the possible difficulties of implementing breeding programmes aimed at improving second-generation biofuel production. However, it was possible to identify QTLs and genomic regions related to GY, PH, and GLU released from straw. In light of the fast-paced growing genomic resources available for wheat, these QTLs constitute a starting point for future investigations into the underlying causal genes responsible for trait variation.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


This study was supported by the Danish Council for Strategic Research, Biotechnology for Bioenergy, Bio4Bio, grant no. 2104080039.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:


  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^
  6. ^


Alexandersson, E., Jacobson, D., Vivier, M. A., Weckwerth, W., and Andreasson, E. (2014). Field-omics-understanding large-scale molecular data from field crops. Front. Plant Sci. 5:286. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4. Available at:

Google Scholar

Beales, J., Turner, A., GriYths, S., Snape, J. W., and Laurie, D. A. (2007). A Pseudo-Response Regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 115, 721–733. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0603-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bekiaris, G., Lindedam, J., Peltre, C., Decker, S. R., Turner, G. B., Magid, J., et al. (2015). Rapid estimation of sugar release from winter wheat straw during bioethanol production using FTIR-photoacoustic spectroscopy. Biotechnol. Biofuels 8:85. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0267-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bentley, A. R., Scutari, M., Gosman, N., Faure, S., Bedford, F., Howell, P., et al. (2014). Applying association mapping and genomic selection to the dissection of key traits in elite European wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 2619–2633. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2403-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bordes, J., Goudemand, E., Duchalais, L., Chevarin, L., Oury, F. X., Heumez, E., et al. (2014). Genome-wide association mapping of three important traits using bread wheat elite breeding populations. Mol. Breed. 33, 755–768. doi: 10.1007/s11032-013-0004-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bradbury, P. J., Zhang, Z., Kroon, D. E., Casstevens, T. M., Ramdoss, Y., and Buckler, E. S. (2007). TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633–2635. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cavanagh, C. R., Chao, S. M., Wang, S. C., Huang, B. E., Stephen, S., Kiani, S., et al. (2013). Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 8057–8062. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217133110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, F., and Dixon, R. A. (2007). Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 759–761. doi: 10.1038/Nbt1316

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Donmez, E., Sears, R. G., Shroyer, J. P., and Paulsen, G. M. (2001). Genetic gain in yield attributes of winter wheat in the great plains. Crop Sci. 41, 1412–1419. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.4151412x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Endelman, J. B., and Jannink, J. L. (2012). Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix. G3 2, 1405–1413. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.004259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flintham, J. E., Borner, A., Worland, A. J., and Gale, M. D. (1997). Optimizing wheat grain yield: Effects of Rht (gibberellin-insensitive) dwarfing genes. J. Agric. Sci. 128, 11–25. doi: 10.1017/S0021859696003942

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, C. X., Mielenz, J. R., Xiao, X. R., Ge, Y. X., Hamilton, C. Y., Rodriguez, M., et al. (2011). Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 3803–3808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100310108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gall, H., Philippe, F., Domon, J. M., Gillet, F., Pelloux, J., and Rayon, C. (2015). Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. Plants 4, 112–166. doi: 10.3390/plants4010112

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Griffiths, S., Simmonds, J., Leverington, M., Wang, Y. K., Fish, L., Sayers, L., et al. (2012). Meta-QTL analysis of the genetic control of crop height in elite European winter wheat germplasm. Mol. Breed. 29, 159–171. doi: 10.1007/s11032-010-9534-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Hao, C. Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, B. Q., Cheng, X. M., Qin, L., et al. (2015). Association and validation of yield-favored alleles in chinese cultivars of common wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). PLoS ONE 10:e0130029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gurung, S., Mamidi, S., Bonman, J. M., Xiong, M., Brown-Guedira, G., and Adhikari, T. B. (2014). Genome-wide association study reveals novel quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to multiple leaf spot diseases of spring wheat. PLoS ONE 9:e108179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Houston, K., Russell, J., Schreiber, M., Halpin, C., Oakey, H., Washington, J. M., et al. (2014). A genome wide association scan for (1,3;1,4)-beta-glucan content in the grain of contemporary 2-row Spring and Winter barleys. BMC Genomics 15:907. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-907

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jensen, J. W., Magid, J., Hansen-Moller, J., Andersen, S. B., and Bruun, S. (2011). Genetic variation in degradability of wheat straw and potential for improvement through plant breeding. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 1114–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.036

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, H. Y., Wan, H. S., Yang, S. H., Zhang, Z. Z., Kong, Z. X., Xue, S. L., et al. (2013). Genetic dissection of yield-related traits in a recombinant inbred line population created using a key breeding parent in China’s wheat breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 2123–2139. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2123-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kamran, A., Iqbal, M., and Spaner, D. (2014). Flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a key factor for global adaptability. Euphytica 197, 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1075-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kilian, A., Wenzl, P., Huttner, E., Carling, J., Xia, L., Blois, H., et al. (2012). Diversity arrays technology: a generic genome profiling technology on open platforms. Methods Mol. Biol. 888, 67–89. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-870-2_5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Korzun, V., Roder, M. S., Ganal, M. W., Worland, A. J., and Law, C. N. (1998). Genetic analysis of the dwarfing gene (Rht8) in wheat. Part I. Molecular mapping of Rht8 on the short arm of chromosome 2D of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 96, 1104–1109. doi: 10.1007/s001220050845

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kretschmer, B., Allen, B., and Hart, K. (2012). Mobilising Cereal Straw in the EU to Feed Advanced Biofuel Production. Report produced for Novozymes. London: IEEP.

Google Scholar

Lado, B., Matus, I., Rodriguez, A., Inostroza, L., Poland, J., Belzile, F., et al. (2013). Increased genomic prediction accuracy in wheat breeding through spatial adjustment of field trial data. G3 3, 2105–2114. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.007807

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larsen, S. U., Bruun, S., and Lindedam, J. (2012). Straw yield and saccharification potential for ethanol in cereal species and wheat cultivars. Biomass Bioenergy 45, 239–250. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.06.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larsson, S. J., Lipka, A. E., and Buckler, E. S. (2013). Lessons from Dwarf8 on the strengths and weaknesses of structured association mapping. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leiser, W. L., Rattunde, H. F., Piepho, H. P., and Parzies, H. K. (2012). Getting the most out of sorghum low-input field trials in west africa using spatial adjustment. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 198, 349–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2012.00529.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H. H., Vikram, P., Singh, R. P., Kilian, A., Carling, J., Song, J., et al. (2015). A high density GBS map of bread wheat and its application for dissecting complex disease resistance traits. BMC Genomics 16:216. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1424-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindedam, J., Andersen, S. B., DeMartini, J., Bruun, S., Jorgensen, H., Felby, C., et al. (2012). Cultivar variation and selection potential relevant to the production of cellulosic ethanol from wheat straw. Biomass Bioenergy 37, 221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lipka, A. E., Tian, F., Wang, Q. S., Peiffer, J., Li, M., Bradbury, P. J., et al. (2012). GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28, 2397–2399. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lopes, M. S., Dreisigacker, S., Pena, R. J., Sukumaran, S., and Reynolds, M. P. (2015). Genetic characterization of the wheat association mapping initiative (WAMI) panel for dissection of complex traits in spring wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 453–464. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2444-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mayer, K. F. X., Martis, M., Hedley, P. E., Simkova, H., Liu, H., Morris, J. A., et al. (2011). Unlocking the barley genome by chromosomal and comparative genomics. Plant Cell 23, 1249–1263. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082537

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mayer, K. F. X., Rogers, J., Dolezel, J., Pozniak, C., Eversole, K., Feuillet, C., et al. (2014). A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science 345:1251788. doi: 10.1126/Science.1251788

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naruoka, Y., Garland-Campbell, K. A., and Carter, A. H. (2015). Genome-wide association mapping for stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis F. sp tritici) in US Pacific Northwest winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 1083–1101. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2492-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nielsen, N. H., Backes, G., Stougaard, J., Andersen, S. U., and Jahoor, A. (2014). Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of european hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties. PLoS ONE 9:e94000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oakey, H., Shafiei, R., Comadran, J., Uzrek, N., Cullis, B., Gomez, L. D., et al. (2013). Identification of crop cultivars with consistently high lignocellulosic sugar release requires the use of appropriate statistical design and modelling. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6:12. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oladosu, G., and Msangi, S. (2013). Biofuel-Food market interactions: a review of modeling approaches and findings. Agriculture 3, 53–71. doi: 10.3390/agriculture3010053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Orabi, J., Jahoor, A., and Backes, G. (2014). Changes in allelic frequency over time in European bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties revealed using DArT and SSR markers. Euphytica 197, 447–462. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1080-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piepho, H. P., Richter, C., and Williams, E. (2008). Nearest neighbour adjustment and linear variance models in plant breeding trials. Biom. J. 50, 164–189. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710414

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Popescu, A. A., Huber, K. T., and Paradis, E. (2012). ape 3.0: new tools for distance-based phylogenetics and evolutionary analysis in R. Bioinformatics 28, 1536–1537. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramstein, G. P., Lipka, A. E., Lu, F., Costich, D. E., Cherney, J. H., Buckler, E. S., et al. (2015). Genome-wide association study based on multiple imputation with low-depth sequencing data: application to biofuel traits in reed canarygrass. G3 (Bethesda) 5, 891–909. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.017533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rincent, R., Nicolas, S., Bouchet, S., Altmann, T., Brunel, D., Revilla, P., et al. (2014). Dent and Flint maize diversity panels reveal important genetic potential for increasing biomass production. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 2313–2331. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2379-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogers, S. O., and Bendich, A. J. (1985). Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant-tissues. Plant Mol. Biol. 5, 69–76. doi: 10.1007/Bf00020088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scarlat, N., Martinov, M., and Dallemand, J. F. (2010). Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: potential and limitations for bioenergy use. Waste Manag. 30, 1889–1897. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwender, H. (2012). Imputing missing genotypes with weighted K nearest neighbors. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 75, 438–446. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2012.674910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaw, L. M., Turner, A. S., and Laurie, D. A. (2012). The impact of photoperiod insensitive Ppd-1a mutations on the photoperiod pathway across the three genomes of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant J. 71, 71–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04971.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shearman, V. J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Scott, R. K., and Foulkes, M. J. (2005). Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Sci. 45, 175–185. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0175

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shu, X. L., and Rasmussen, S. K. (2014). Quantification of amylose, amylopectin, and beta-glucan in search for genes controlling the three major quality traits in barley by genome-wide association studies. Front. Plant Sci. 5:197. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sibout, R., Eudes, A., Mouille, G., Pollet, B., Lapierre, C., Jouanin, L., et al. (2005). CINNAMYL ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE-C and -D are the primary genes involved in lignin biosynthesis in the floral stem of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 2059–2076. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.030767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sukumaran, S., Dreisigacker, S., Lopes, M., Chavez, P., and Reynolds, M. P. (2015). Genome-wide association study for grain yield and related traits in an elite spring wheat population grown in temperate irrigated environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 353–363. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2435-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sumiyoshi, M., Nakamura, A., Nakamura, H., Hakata, M., Ichikawa, H., Hirochika, H., et al. (2013). Increase in cellulose accumulation and improvement of saccharification by overexpression of arabinofuranosidase in rice. PLoS ONE 8:e78269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078269

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sundin, L., Vanholme, R., Geerinck, J., Goeminne, G., Hofer, R., Kim, H., et al. (2014). Mutation of the Inducible ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA CYTOCHROME P450 REDUCTASE2 alters lignin composition and improves saccharification. Plant Physiol. 166, 1956–1971. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.245548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Technow, F. (2014). R Package for Moving Grid Adjustment in Plant Breeding Field Trials. Available at: [Accessed October 10, 2014].

Google Scholar

The R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Google Scholar

Truntzler, M., Barriere, Y., Sawkins, M. C., Lespinasse, D., Betran, J., Charcosset, A., et al. (2010). Meta-analysis of QTL involved in silage quality of maize and comparison with the position of candidate genes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121, 1465–1482. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1402-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S. C., Wong, D. B., Forrest, K., Allen, A., Chao, S. M., Huang, B. E., et al. (2014). Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 787–796. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y. H., Acharya, A., Burrell, A. M., Klein, R. R., Klein, P. E., and Hasenstein, K. H. (2013). Mapping and candidate genes associated with saccharification yield in sorghum. Genome 56, 659–665. doi: 10.1139/gen-2013-0134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wurschum, T., Langer, S. M., and Longin, C. F. H. (2015). Genetic control of plant height in European winter wheat cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 865–874. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2476-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zanke, C. D., Ling, J., Plieske, J., Kollers, S., Ebmeyer, E., Korzun, V., et al. (2014). Whole genome association mapping of plant height in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 9:e113287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113287

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, H., Muehlbauer, G., and Steffenson, B. (2012). Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite barley breeding germplasm from the United States. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 13, 438–451. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1200003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: QTL, Triticum aestivum L., GWAS, recalcitrance, ligno-cellulosic biomass

Citation: Bellucci A, Torp AM, Bruun S, Magid J, Andersen SB and Rasmussen SK (2015) Association Mapping in Scandinavian Winter Wheat for Yield, Plant Height, and Traits Important for Second-Generation Bioethanol Production. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1046. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01046

Received: 19 August 2015; Accepted: 09 November 2015;
Published: 26 November 2015.

Edited by:

Elena Prats, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Spain

Reviewed by:

Agata Gadaleta, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
Zhongyun Piao, Shenyang Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2015 Bellucci, Torp, Bruun, Magid, Andersen and Rasmussen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Søren K. Rasmussen,

Deceased 9 March, 2015

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.