Abstract
Inducible gene expression has emerged as a powerful tool for plant functional genomics. The estrogen receptor-based, chemical-inducible system XVE has been used in many plant species, but the limited systemic movement of inducer β-estradiol in transgenic rice plants has prohibited a wide use of the XVE system in this important food crop. Here, we constructed an improved chemical-regulated, site-specific recombination system by employing the XVE transactivator in combination with a Cre/loxP-FRT system, and optimized a seed-soaking procedure for XVE induction in rice. By using a gus gene and an hpRNAi cassette targeted for OsPDS as reporters, we demonstrated that soaking transgenic seeds with estradiol solution could induce highly efficient site-specific recombination in germinating embryos, resulting in constitutive and high-level expression of target gene or RNAi cassette in intact rice plants from induced seeds. The strategy reported here thereby provides a useful gene activation approach for effectively regulating gene expression in rice.
Introduction
Inducible gene expression systems are powerful tools for basic research in plant functional genomics, and for plant biotechnology applications such as the deletion of selectable marker genes in transgenic plants (). Over the last two decades, heat-inducible system (; ; ), and chemical-inducible systems responding to various inducers, such as glucocorticoid (; ), copper (; ), tetracycline (; ), herbicide safeners (), ethanol (; ), ecdysone (), and β-estradiol (; ) have been developed. Compared to constitutive gene expression driven by constitutive promoters, conditional gene expression controlled by the chemical-inducible systems has provided a more flexible approach for functional dissection of developmentally important genes, especially if the genes related to regeneration, growth, reproduction, or lethality.
Among the developed chemical-inducible systems, the estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE () appears to be one of the most reliable and efficient systems. XVE consists of a DNA-binding domain of the bacterial repressor LexA, a transactivating domain of herpes simplex virus VP16, and a human estrogen receptor. Characterization of the XVE system in Arabidopsis demonstrated that the target gene expression controlled by this system was highly induced and tightly regulated upon estradiol induction (). The XVE system has been applied to different plant species, including basal land plant moss (), flowering dicot (, ; ; ; ) and monocot (; ) plants.
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the world’s most important staple food crops and has been established as a model organism for the functional genomics of monocot plants. The availability of highly accurate genomic sequences of both indica () and japonica () subspecies, and many other accumulated genomic and molecular resources (; ), has greatly promoted genomic and genetic studies in rice. The XVE system has been tested in rice calli to produce marker-free transgenic plants (), and in both calli and seedlings to investigate target gene expression patterns (). The two reports showed that the XVE system is functional in regulating gene expression in rice calli and roots. In the leaves of intact plantlets treated with estradiol through root absorption, however, target gene induction was observed at a very low level (), becoming one of the major limitations for this system to be widely used in discovering gene function in rice.
In the present study, based on detailed investigation of XVE-controlled gene expression patterns in calli, detached leaf pieces, and intact plantlets, we proposed that limited systemic movement of estradiol might be the key reason for low inducibility in intact rice plants. To meet the need for high-level target gene expression in intact rice plants, we further constructed an improved XVE-controlled, site-specific recombination system and optimized the induction procedure for rice seeds. Experiments based on a reporter gus gene and an hpRNAi cassette targeted to a rice phytoene desaturase (OsPDS) gene showed that soaking transgenic seeds with estradiol solution could activate highly efficient site-specific recombination in germinating embryos, resulting in constitutive activation of the target gene or RNAi cassette in intact rice plants. Our method thereby provides a useful gene activation approach for functional genomics in rice.
Materials and Methods
Plasmid Construction
Plant expression vectors pUX-GUS, pXCL-GUS, pXCLF-GUS, and pXCLF-PDSi were constructed following standard molecular manipulation procedures (), except that the TOPO cloning and the LR clonase reaction for constructing pXCLF-PDSi were carried out by following Gateway cloning protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States). All plasmids derived from PCR products or synthetic oligonucleotides were verified by sequencing. Details of plasmid construction are available in Supplementary Table S1.
Rice Protoplast Transient Expression Assay
Protoplasts were isolated from 2-week-old etiolated seedlings of rice, O. sativa cv. Nipponbare. PEG-mediated protoplast transfection was carried out by following previously described procedures (). After transfection, estradiol was applied to protoplasts immediately with final concentration of 20 μM. Protoplasts were harvested after incubation for 12, 24, 36, and 48 h, respectively, and subjected to GUS assay.
Transformation of Rice Calli and Production of Transgenic Rice
Plant expression constructs pUX-GUS, pXCL-GUS, pXCLF-GUS, and pXCLF-PDSi were introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404. Rice callus was induced from the embryos of mature seeds of cv Nipponbare. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice calli was conducted using the method described previously (). The hygromycin-resistant transgenic calli were subjected to estradiol induction assays or transferred to regeneration medium. Regenerated transgenic plants and their progeny were grown in a greenhouse. Transgenic lines contain a single copy of T-DNA insertion based on genetic segregation analysis of T1 generation, Southern blotting, and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of transgene copy number were used for further analyses (Supplementary Figure S1).
Estradiol Treatment
17-β-estradiol (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) was dissolved to 20 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and stored at -20°C as stock solution. The stock solution was added to sterilized water, or solid medium at a final concentration of 20 μM immediately before use. The same volume of DMSO was added to the negative control solution or medium without estradiol. For induction treatment, rice transgenic calli were directly cultured on N6 medium supplemented with estradiol, and rice detached leaf pieces or rice seeds were submerged in estradiol water solution. In whole-plantlet treatment, seedlings germinated on 1/2 MS medium plates were transferred to small tubes or flasks, and plantlet roots were submerged in estradiol water solution.
GUS Assays
GUS assays were performed as described by . The fluorometric assay was carried out using 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) as substrate, and the histochemical staining was performed using X-Gluc (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) as substrate.
PCR, DNA Sequencing, qPCR, and qRT-PCR Analyses
Genomic DNA was extracted from rice tissues by using the CTAB method as described by . PCR for investigating the recombination events in induced rice plants was carried out under standard conditions. The PCR products from primers LF-P1/LF-P4 or LF-P1/LF-P5 amplified from the induced LF-GUS or LF-PDSi plants were sequenced. The sequencing results were analyzed using Sequence Scanner software (Applied Biosystems). Real-time qPCR was performed to determine transgene copy number in homozygous lines by following previously described method (). The single-copy rice endogenous gene RBE4 () was used as a reference and the Hpt gene was used as probe.
Total RNA was isolated from rice leaf tissues by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, United States) and was subsequently treated with RNase-free DNase I (Takara, Dalian, China) to remove DNA contamination. Reverse transcription was carried out using 2.5 μg of DNase I-treated total RNA with the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, Lithuania, EU) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The qPCR was performed on an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, United States) using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
All primers used for PCR, qPCR, and qRT-PCR were listed in the Supplementary Table S2.
Southern Blot Analysis
Southern blot analysis was performed following standard procedures (). Rice genomic DNA (about 10 μg) was digested with appropriate restriction enzymes. The digested DNA was separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, and was transferred onto a Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). The blot was hybridized using a 3′-end fragment of the maize ubiquitin-1 promoter labeled by Alkphos Direct Labelling Reagents (Amersham Bioscience).
Results
XVE Stringently and Efficiently Regulates Gene Expression in Rice Cells and Tissues upon Direct Contact with Estradiol
We generated the estrogen-inducible expression construct pUX-GUS (Figure 1) using a gus gene as a reporter, because the GUS system has been proved to be a reliable and extremely sensitive reporter allowing both quantitative and histochemical assessment of gene activity in plants (). The pUX-GUS construct was first tested transiently in rice protoplasts. The transfected rice protoplasts were treated with 20 μM estradiol. Transient expression assays showed that the GUS expression level in transfected rice protoplasts was significantly induced after 12 h induction, and the induced level was increased gradually after 24, 36, and 48 h inductions (Figure 2A). In transfected rice protoplasts without treatment with estradiol, GUS expression was detected at a very low level after 24 h incubation, and remained at a similar low level after 36 or 48 h incubation (Figure 2A).
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

XVE-controlled GUS expression in rice protoplast, calli, and leaf tissues upon direct contact with estradiol. (A) Transient expression assay of XVE-controlled GUS expression in rice protoplasts. Protoplasts transfected with construct pUX-GUS were treated with 0 or 20 μM estradiol for 12, 24, 36, and 48 h, respectively. GUS expressions are represented as relative GUS/LUC activity. ∗∗P < 0.01, t-test. (B) GUS staining of rice calli induced with 0 or 20 μM estradiol. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; 35S-GUS-14, line #14 of rice calli transformed with construct pCAMBIA1305, in which the gus gene was driven by a 35S promoter; X-GUS-5 and X-GUS-11, line #5 and #11 of rice calli transformed with construct pUX-GUS. (C) GUS staining of detached transgenic leaf pieces induced with 0 or 20 μM estradiol.
To further analyze XVE-controlled gene expression in stably integrated transgenic rice tissues, pUX-GUS and a control construct pCAMBIA1305.21 in which a gus gene is driven by a constitutive CaMV 35S promoter (
Transgenic calli were further cultured to regenerate rice plants, and a total of 17 independent T0 X-GUS lines were obtained. Small pieces of transgenic plant leaves were cut and exposed to 20 μM estradiol for 24 h, and the GUS activity was determined by histochemical staining. From 17 independent lines, two lines showed no GUS staining in detached leaf pieces either treated or not treated with estradiol, and one line showed weak GUS staining in both induced and uninduced leaf pieces. For the remaining 14 lines, while no GUS staining was detected in leaf pieces without treatment, clear GUS staining was observed in estradiol treated-leaf pieces (Figure 2C). Taken together, these results demonstrated that the XVE system could stringently and efficiently regulate gene expression in rice cells and tissues.
XVE Mediates Low Level Inducibility of Target Gene in the Leaves of Intact Plants Induced with Estradiol through Root Absorption
The transgenic X-GUS, and 35S-GUS rice plants were grown to produce progeny of advanced generation for further analysis. Among the 14 screened X-GUS lines, #5 and #11 were examined to confer a strong estradiol-inducible GUS expression pattern in detached leaf pieces, and contain a single copy of T-DNA insertion based on genetic segregation analysis of T1 generation, Southern blotting and qPCR analysis of transgene copy number (Supplementary Figure S1). Detached leaf pieces of X-GUS plants of each different generation (T1 to T4) were treated with estradiol, and GUS staining could be observed in induced leaf tissues but not in uninduced tissues, similar to that of T0 generation plants (Figure 2C). These results suggested that XVE-controlled GUS expression pattern could be inherited stably over generations.
To examine the estrogen-induced target gene expression patterns in intact rice plantlets, 4-day-old seedlings of T5 homozygous lines were cultured in liquid solution via a root absorption manner for 2 days. The cultured seedlings were subjected to histochemical staining. While no GUS expression was observed in plantlets of X-GUS-#5 or X-GUS-#11 cultured in liquid medium without estradiol, strong GUS staining was observed in the roots of X-GUS-#5 and X-GUS-#11 cultured in estradiol solution (Figure 3A). However, when compared with 35S-GUS plants, X-GUS plantlets showed only weak GUS staining in leaf tissues (Figure 3A). A fluorometric assay was also performed to detect GUS expression level in transgenic plantlets. Three-leaf-stage seedlings of transgenic plants were cultured in liquid solution for different induction periods (0, 2, 5, 10, and 15 days), and the roots, shoots, and leaves of the cultured seedlings were collected and evaluated for GUS activity. With 20 μM estradiol induction for 2 days, GUS expression was induced in X-GUS plantlets. In the roots of X-GUS-#5 and X-GUS-#11, GUS level was about two times higher than or similar to that of 35S-GUS plants (Figures 3B,C). However, GUS level in the leaves of X-GUS-#5 and X-GUS-#11 was much lower than that of 35S-GUS plants (Figure 3D), similar to previous report that XVE-controlled GFP was expressed at a low level in the leaves of transgenic seedlings cultured on the inductive medium (
FIGURE 3

XVE-controlled GUS expression in intact transgenic rice seedlings treated with estradiol through root absorption. (A) GUS staining of rice plantlets exposed to 0 or 20 μM estradiol via root immersion for 2 days. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; 35S-GUS-14 and 35S-GUS-24, pCAMBIA1305-transformed rice line #14 and #24; X-GUS-5 and X-GUS-11, pUX-GUS-transformed rice line #5 and #11. (B–D) GUS fluorometric assay of the roots (B), stems (C), and leaves (D) of rice plantlets cultured in 0 or 20 μM estradiol via root immersion. Three-leaf-old seedlings of rice plants were cultured in liquid solution, and the roots, shoots, or leaves of the cultured seedlings were collected for GUS assay on days 0, 2, 5, 10, and 15, respectively. Different letters indicate groups with significant differences (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Construction of an Improved Chemical-Regulated, Site-Specific Recombination System for Rice
Unlike Arabidopsis, rice plants are larger in size, and have a relatively longer life cycle. The difficulty in inducing target genes to be expressed at a high level in the leaves of intact plantlets, and the relatively short induction duration, have limited the use of the XVE system in rice. We reasoned that a system permitting constitutive gene expression after chemical induction would be more feasible for rice. We thus designed an alternative approach by employing the XVE system coupled with a site-specific recombination cassette. A basic construct pXCL-GUS, in which a XVE-controlled Cre/loxP-mediated recombination would lead to fusion of a maize (Zea mays) ubiquitin-1 promoter (
The XVE-controlled Cre/loxP-FRT (XCLF) System Permits Inducible and High-Level Expression of Target Genes in Transgenic Rice Plants
The uninduced rice calli transformed with pXCLF-GUS (named LF-GUS) were cultured on media for regeneration, and a total of 18 independent T0 plants were obtained. T0 plants were transferred to soil and maintained in a greenhouse to produce T1 seeds. To induce expression of Cre recombinase, we soaked transgenic rice seeds in liquid solution instead of germinating seeds on solid medium. A 3-day soaking of seeds was observed to have a good effect on seed induction (Figure 4A). By histochemical staining assay, about 12 T1 independent lines were detected to display induced GUS expression upon seed-soaking treatment. In LF-GUS lines, GUS expression was detected in the embryos of LF-GUS transgenic seeds soaked in the inductive solution, but not in seeds soaked in the solution without estradiol (Figure 4A). The LF-GUS seedlings developed from induced seeds displayed a constitutive expression pattern of GUS, whereas no GUS or only very faint GUS spots were observed in uninduced LF-GUS seedlings (Figure 4B).
FIGURE 4

Induced GUS expression in germinating embryos and seedlings of LF-GUS transgenic rice. (A) GUS staining of rice seeds soaked in 0 or 20 μM estradiol for 3 days. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; 35S-GUS-14 and 35S-GUS-24, pCAMBIA1305-transformed rice line #14 and #24; LF-GUS-22 and LF-GUS-42, pXCLF-GUS-transformed rice line #22 and #42. (B) GUS staining of seedlings developed from seeds soaked and germinated in liquid solution with 0 or 20 μM estradiol.
The T2 generation of four LF-GUS homozygous lines, #15, #21, #22, and #42 were subjected to more detailed analysis. In mature flowering plants developed from estradiol-induced LF-GUS seeds, constitutive GUS expression was detected in root, stem, leaf, and floret tissues of LF-GUS plants by histochemical staining (Figure 5A). Consistent with results observed in T1 seedlings, almost no GUS staining or only very faint GUS spots were observed in tissues of LF-GUS plants developed from uninduced seeds (Figure 5A). Fluorometric assays confirmed that GUS was highly expressed in all tested root, stem, and leaf tissues in the induced mature LF-GUS plants (Figures 5B–D). While the level of GUS activity in root, stem, or leaf tissues of LF-GUS-#15 plants were comparable to that of 35S-GUS-#14 plants, GUS expression level of LF-GUS-#21, #22, or #42 plants was about 1.5–2 times higher than that of 35S-GUS-#14 plants (Figures 5B–D). In uninduced LF-GUS plants, only a low GUS level similar to that of non-transgenic plants was detected (Figures 5B–D). No GUS expression was detected in tissues of mature plants of X-GUS line #11 developed from seeds germinated in liquid solution with or without inducer (Figures 5A–D), indicating that estradiol induction in seeds did not persist to later times.
FIGURE 5

Induced GUS expression in mature LF-GUS transgenic rice plants. (A) GUS staining of the roots, stems, leaves, and florets of mature plants developed from seeds soaked in liquid solution with 0 or 20 μM estradiol. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; 35S-GUS-14, pCAMBIA1305-transformed rice line #14; X-GUS-11, pUX-GUS-transformed rice line #11; LF-GUS-22 and LF-GUS-42, pXCLF-GUS-transformed rice line #22 and #42. (B–D) GUS fluorometric assay of the roots (B), stems (C) and leaves (D) of mature rice plants developed from seeds soaked and germinated in liquid solution with 0 or 20 μM estradiol. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; X-GUS-11, pUX-GUS-transformed rice line #11; 35S-GUS-14, pCAMBIA1305-transformed rice line #14; LF-GUS #15, #21, #22, and #42, pXCLF-GUS-transformed rice line #15, #21, #22, and #42. Statistical significances (∗P < 0.05 or ∗∗P < 0.01) between plants developed from seeds soaked in 0 or 20 μM estradiol were analyzed by Student’s t-test.
PCR analysis was performed on genomic DNA isolated from root, stem, and leaf tissues to investigate the recombination events in LF-GUS plants. Using specific primers LF-P1/LF-P2 targeted to the joint region of pUbi-loxP-FRT-XVE, and LF-P3/LF-P4 to the joint region of Cre-int-Tnos-loxP-FRT-gus of the non-recombinant T-DNA (Figure 1), the expected 1019 and 679 bp fragments were detected in the tissues of uninduced LF-GUS plants, respectively (Figures 6A–C). No LF-P1/LF-P2 or LF-P3/LF-P4 fragments were detected in the tissues of induced LF-GUS plants except for line #42 showing a faint band, indicating highly efficient DNA recombination in induced plants. By contrast, PCR amplifications using primers LF-P1/LF-P4 generated a 626 bp fragment consistent with reconstitution of the pUbi-loxP-FRT-gus transcription unit (Figure 6D) in induced LF-GUS plants, except that a faint band was detected in uninduced line # 22 (Figures 6A–D), indicating no DNA or almost no DNA recombination in uninduced plants. The PCR products of LF-P1/LF-P4 fragments amplified from induced plants of the four LF-GUS plants were sequenced. And sequencing results from all four lines were identical, showing that the maize ubiquitin-1 promoter was contiguous with one copy of loxP-FRT sequence, followed by the gus sequence (Figure 6D). DNA isolated from LF-GUS-#15 and LF-GUS-#21 plants was double cut with XhoI and SpeI (Figure 6D), and Southern blot analysis was performed using a 3′-end fragment of the maize ubiquitin-1 promoter as a probe. As showed in Figure 6E, an expected 4.2 kb band was detected in uninduced LF-GUS-#15 and LF-GUS-#21. By contrast, a 1.4-kb band was detected in induced LF-GUS-#15 and LF-GUS-#21 plants, confirming the recombination events in LF-GUS plants.
FIGURE 6

Molecular characterization of chemical-induced site-specific DNA recombination in LF-GUS transgenic rice plants. (A–C) PCR analysis of genomic DNA extracted from the roots (A), stems (B), and leaves (C) of LF-GUS plants. M, DNA molecular marker; P, plasmid control pXCLF-GUS; CK, non-transgenic wild type control; #15, #21, #22, and #42, pXCLF-GUS-transformed rice line #15, #21, #22, and #42; 0, plants developed from seeds soaked and germinated in liquid solution with 0 μM estradiol; 20, plants developed from seeds soaked and germinated in liquid solution with 20 μM estradiol. (D) Sequence confirmation of site-specific DNA recombination in the genome of induced LF-GUS plants. The diagram represents the putative reconstituted structure after recombination between two loxP-FRT sites. Sequence below the diagram indicates the predicted nucleotide sequence of the junction regions at the recombined loxP-FRT site. The bottom chromatogram shows sequencing results of the LF-P1/LF-P2 amplified product from induced LF-GUS plants. (E) Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA extracted from leaves of LF-GUS plants. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; #15 and #21, pXCLF-GUS-transformed rice line #15 and #21; 0, plants developed from seeds soaked and germinated in liquid solution with 0 μM estradiol; 20, plants developed from seeds soaked and germinated in liquid solution with 20 μM estradiol. Rice genomic DNA was digested with XhoI and SpeI. The blot was hybridized with a 3′-end fragment of the maize ubiquitin-1 promoter.
Inducible Silencing of Endogenous OsPDS in Transgenic Rice Plants
In addition to ectopic expression of target genes, the XCLF system was also tested for gene knock-down in rice plants. A RNAi construct pXCLF-PDSi (Figure 1), which contained an hpRNAi cassette targeted to a rice phytoene desaturase (OsPDS) gene, was developed and introduced into rice by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. A total of 14 independent T0 plants (named LF-PDSi) were obtained, and no uninduced plants showed detectable albino phenotype. In the T1 generation, eight lines of induced transgenic plants showed a clear albino phenotype (Figures 7A,B), whereas all transgenic lines developed from seeds geminated in liquid solution without estradiol grew similar to non-transgenic control plants. Real-time RT-PCR analysis showed that the endogenous OsPDS mRNA level was greatly reduced in the induced plants (Figure 7C). Using the same primers LF-P1, LF-P2, and LF-P3 used for detecting LF-GUS plants, and a specific primer LF-P5 targeted to the hpRNAi cassette of the OsPDS fragment (Figure 1), PCR analysis detected LF-P1/LF-P2, LF-P3/LF-P5 non-recombinant fragments only in uninduced plants, except for induced line #26 showing faint amplified bands (Figure 7D). By contrast, PCR analysis detected a 583 bp LF-P1/LF-P5 recombinant fragment only in induced LF-PDSi plants (Figure 7D). Moreover, sequencing results of the LF-P1/LF-P5 amplified products from induced LF-PDSi plants indicated the accurate reconstitution of the recombinant cassette of pUbi-loxP-FRT-hpRNAi (OsPDS) (Supplementary Figure S2). These results confirmed that the albino phenotype in induced LF-PDSi plants resulted from knock-down of OsPDS gene expression mediated by chemically regulated recombination of the XCLF system.
FIGURE 7

Induced OsPDS silencing in mature LF-PDSi transgenic rice plants. (A) Phenotype of mature plants developed from seeds soaked in liquid solution with 0 or 20 μM estradiol. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; LF-PDSi-26, pXCLF-PDSi-transformed rice line #26. (B) Phenotype of leaves from mature plants developed from seeds soaked in liquid solution with 0 or 20 μM estradiol. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; LF-PDSi-3, LF-PDSi-26, pXCLF-PDSi-transformed rice line #3 and #26. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of endogenous OsPDS mRNA level in mature plants developed from seeds soaked in liquid solution 0 or 20 μM estradiol. CK, non-transgenic wild type control; LF-PDSi-3, LF-PDSi-6, LF-PDSi-26, LF-PDSi-41, pXCLF-PDSi-transformed rice line #3, #6, #26, and #41. Statistical significances (∗∗P < 0.01) between plants developed from seeds soaked in 0 or in 20 μM estradiol were analyzed by Student’s t-test. (D) PCR analysis of chemical-induced site-specific DNA recombination in LF-PDSi transgenic rice plants. P, plasmid control pXCLF-PDSi; CK, non-transgenic wild type control; #3, #6, #26, and #41, pXCLF-PDSi-transformed rice line #3, #6, #26, and #41; 0, plants developed from seeds soaked and germinated in liquid solution with 0 μM estradiol; 20, plants developed from seeds soaked and germinated in liquid solution with 20 μM estradiol.
Discussion
In previous studies, gene induction systems such as the GVG system (
By using the firefly luciferase system as a reporter,
To meet the need for chemical-regulated, high-level expression of target gene in intact rice plants, we have designed an alternative approach by employing the XVE system coupled with a site-specific recombination cassette. In the backbone of the original XVE constructs pER8 (
In a previous report,
Conclusion
The chemical-induced, seed-soaking activation procedure based on the XCLF system appears to be effective in regulating gene expression in intact rice plants (Figure 8), therefore providing a useful tool for functional genomics and biotechnology applications such as the deletion of selectable marker genes in rice.
FIGURE 8

Schematic representation of the chemical-induced, seed-soaking activation procedure for regulated gene expression in rice. In the designed XVE-controlled Cre/loxP-FRT (XCLF) constructs, a fragment of expression cassettes of XVE, hpt, and cre genes flanked by two loxP-FRT sites in a direct orientation was inserted in between the maize ubiquitin-1 promoter and the GOI (gene of interest). In the XCLF-transformed rice plants, GOI is not expressed under uninduced condition. Through seed-soaking with estradiol inducer, DNA recombination occurred in embryos would lead to fusion of the maize ubiquitin-1 promoter to the GOI, resulting in constitutive activation of GOI in intact plants developed from induced seeds.
Data Accessibility
The sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank database, under accession numbers MF434112 (pUX-GUS), MF434111 (pXCL-GUS), MF434113 (pXCLF-GUS), and MF434110 (pXCLF-PDSi).
Statements
Author contributions
ZJC, G-LW, FW, and SC conceived and designed the experiments. ZJC, QC, CH, XG, ZQC, YL, TH, and MB performed the experiments. ZJC, QC, ZW, FW, and SC analyzed the data. GL and ZW contributed reagents and tools. ZJC and SC wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by National Major Special Project on New Varieties Cultivation for Transgenic Organisms, China (2016ZX08001001-002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1405212, 31471760), and by the Science and Technology Plan of Fujian Province, China (2014R1019-3).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Zhongchao Yin, Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Singapore, for kindly providing the pUH-GFP2 plasmid, and Dr. Daniel J. Ebbole for editing of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.01447/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
References
1
AmirsadeghiS.McDonaldA. E.VanlerbergheG. C. (2007). A glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression system can cause growth defects in tobacco.Planta226453–463. 10.1007/s00425-007-0495-1
2
AndersenS. U.CvitanichC.HougaardB. K.RoussisA.GrønlundM.JensenD. B.et al (2003). The glucocorticoid-inducible GVG system causes severe growth defects in both root and shoot of the model legume Lotus japonicus.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.161069–1076. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.12.1069
3
AoyamaT.ChuaN. H. (1997). A glucocorticoid-mediated transcriptional induction system in transgenic plants.Plant J.11605–612. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11030605.x
4
BewleyJ. D. (1997). Seed germination and dormancy.Plant Cell91055–1066. 10.1105/tpc.9.7.1055
5
BohnerS.LenkI.RiepingM.HeroldM.GatzC. (1999). Transcriptional activator TGV mediates dexamethasone-inducible and tetracycline-inactivable gene expression.Plant J.1987–95. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00503.x
6
BruceW.FolkertsO.GarnaatC.CrastaO.RothB.BowenB. (2000). Expression profiling of the maize flavonoid pathway genes controlled by β-estradiol-inducible transcription factors CRC and P.Plant Cell1265–80. 10.1105/tpc.12.1.65
7
CaddickM. X.GreenlandA. J.JepsonI.KrauseK. P.QuN.RiddellK. V.et al (1998). An ethanol inducible gene switch for plants used to manipulate carbon metabolism.Nat. Biotechnol.16177–180. 10.1038/nbt0298-177
8
ChenS.TaoL.ZengL.Vega-SanchezM. E.UmemuraK.WangG. L. (2006). A highly efficient transient protoplast system for analyzing defence gene expression and protein-protein interactions in rice.Mol. Plant Pathol.7417–427. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00346.x
9
ChristensenA. H.QuailP. H. (1996). Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants.Transgenic Res.5213–218. 10.1007/BF01969712
10
ChristensenA. H.SharrockR. A.QuailP. H. (1992). Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation.Plant Mol. Biol.18675–689. 10.1007/BF00020010
11
De VeylderL.Van MontaguM.InzeD. (1997). Herbicide safener-inducible gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Cell Physiol.38568–577. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029206
12
GuoH. S.FeiJ. F.XieQ.ChuaN. H. (2003). A chemical-regulated inducible RNAi system in plants.Plant J.34383–392. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01723.x
13
HieiY.OhtaS.KomariT.KumashiroT. (1994). Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA.Plant J.6271–282. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.6020271.x
14
International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (2005). The map-based sequence of the rice genome.Nature436793–800. 10.1038/nature03895
15
JeffersonR. A.KavanaghT. A.BevanM. W. (1987). GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants.EMBO J.63901–3907.
16
JungK. H.AnG.RonaldP. C. (2008). Towards a better bowl of rice: assigning function to tens of thousands of rice genes.Nat. Rev. Genet.991–101. 10.1038/nrm2343
17
KangH. G.FangY.SinghK. B. (1999). A glucocorticoid-inducible transcription system causes severe growth defects in Arabidopsis and induces defense-related genes.Plant J.20127–133. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00575.x
18
KhattriA.NandyS.SrivastavaV. (2011). Heat-inducible Cre-lox system for marker excision in transgenic rice.J. Biosci.3637–42. 10.1007/s12038-011-9010-8
19
KikuchiS.SatohK.NagataT.KawagashiraN.DoiK.KishimotoN.et al (2003). Collection, mapping, and annotation of over 28 000 cDNA clones from japonica rice.Science301376–379. 10.1126/science.1081288
20
KuboM.ImaiA.NishiyamaT.IshikawaM.SatoY.KurataT.et al (2013). System for stable β-estradiol-inducible gene expression in the moss Physcomitrella patens.PLoS ONE8:e77356. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077356
21
LuoK.DuanH.ZhaoD.ZhengX.DengW.ChenY.et al (2007). ‘GM-gene-deletor’: fused loxP-FRT recognition sequences dramatically improve the efficiency of FLP or CRE recombinase on transgene excision from pollen and seed of tobacco plants.Plant Biotechnol. J.5263–274. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00237.x
22
MartinezA.SparksC.HartC. A.ThompsonJ.JepsonI. (1999). Ecdysone agonist inducible transcription in transgenic tobacco plants.Plant J.1997–106. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00504.x
23
McKenzieM. J.MettV.ReynoldsP. H. S.JamesonP. E. (1998). Controlled cytokinin production in transgenic tobacco using a copper-inducible promoter.Plant Physiol.116969–977. 10.1104/pp.116.3.969
24
MettV. L.LochheadL. P.ReynoldsP. H. S. (1993). Copper-controllable gene expression system for whole plants.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.904567–4571. 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4567
25
MooreI.SamalovaM.KurupS. (2006). Transactivated and chemically inducible gene expression in plants.Plant J.45651–683. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02660.x
26
MurrayM. G.ThompsonW. F. (1980). Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA.Nucleic Acids Res.84321–4325. 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321
27
NandyS.SrivastavaV. (2012). Marker-free site-specific gene integration in rice based on the use of two recombination systems.Plant Biotechnol. J.10904–912. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00715.x
28
OdellJ. T.NagyF.ChuaN. H. (1985). Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter.Nature313810–812. 10.1038/313810a0
29
OkuzakiA.KonagayaK.NanasatoY.TsudaM.TabeiY. (2011). Estrogen-inducible GFP expression patterns in rice (Oryza sativa L.).Plant Cell Rep.30529–538. 10.1007/s00299-010-0963-0
30
OuwerkerkP. B.de KamR. J.HogeJ. H.MeijerA. H. (2001). Glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression in rice.Planta213370–378. 10.1007/s004250100583
31
SalterM. G.PaineJ. A.RiddellK. V.JepsonI.GreenlandA. J.CaddickM. X.et al (1998). Characterisation of the ethanol-inducible alc gene expression system for transgenic plants.Plant J.16127–132. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00281.x
32
SambrookJ.RussellD. (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
33
SandersP. R.WinterJ. A.BarnasonA. R.RogersS. G.FraleyR. T. (1987). Comparison of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and nopaline synthase promoters in transgenic plants.Nucleic Acids Res.151543–1558. 10.1093/nar/15.4.1543
34
SchenaM.LloydA. M.WalbotV.DavisR. W. (1991). A steroid-inducible gene expression system for plant cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.8810421–10425. 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10421
35
SchlückingK.EdelK. H.KösterP.DrerupM. M.EckertC.SteinhorstL.et al (2013). A new β-estradiol-inducible vector set that facilitates easy construction and efficient expression of transgenes reveals CBL3-dependent cytoplasm to tonoplast translocation of CIPK5.Mol. Plant61814–1829. 10.1093/mp/sst065
36
SreekalaC.WuL.GuK.WangD.TianD.YinZ. (2005). Excision of a selectable marker in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) using a chemically regulated Cre/loxP system.Plant Cell Rep.2486–94. 10.1007/s00299-004-0909-5
37
WangX.JiangD.YangD. (2015). Fast-tracking determination of homozygous transgenic lines and transgene stacking using a reliable quantitative real-time PCR assay.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.175996–1006. 10.1007/s12010-014-1322-3
38
WeinmannP.GossenM.HillenW.BujardH.GatzC. (1994). A chimeric transactivator allows tetracycline-responsive gene expression in whole plants.Plant J.5559–569. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.5040559.x
39
YoshidaK.SaitohH.FujisawaS.KanzakiH.MatsumuraH.YoshidaK.et al (2009). Association genetics reveals three novel avirulence genes from the rice blast fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae.Plant Cell211573–1591. 10.1105/tpc.109.066324
40
YuJ.HuS. N.WangJ.WongG. K.LiS.LiuB.et al (2002). A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. Indica).Science29679–92. 10.1126/science.1068037
41
ZhangS.ChenL.GoffS. A. (2007). “Regulation of gene expression by small molecules in rice,” in Novartis Foundation Symposium 236 – Rice Biotechnology: Improving Yield, Stress Tolerance and Grain Quality,edsGoodeJ. A.ChadwickD. (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons), 85–96. 10.1002/9780470515778.ch7
42
ZhangW.SubbaraoS.AddaeP.ShenA.ArmstrongC.PeschkeV.et al (2003). Cre/lox-mediated marker gene excision in transgenic maize (Zea mays L.) plants.Theor. Appl. Genet.1071157–1168. 10.1007/s00122-003-1368-z
43
ZuoJ.NiuQ. W.ChuaN. H. (2000). An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE mediates highly inducible gene expression in transgenic plants.Plant J.24265–273. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00868.x
44
ZuoJ.NiuQ. W.MøllerS. G.ChuaN. H. (2001). Chemical-regulated, site-specific DNA excision in transgenic plants.Nat. Biotechnol.19157–161. 10.1038/84428
Summary
Keywords
Oryza sativa, regulated gene expression, XVE system, DNA recombination, seed-soaking
Citation
Chen Z, Cheng Q, Hu C, Guo X, Chen Z, Lin Y, Hu T, Bellizzi M, Lu G, Wang G-L, Wang Z, Chen S and Wang F (2017) A Chemical-Induced, Seed-Soaking Activation Procedure for Regulated Gene Expression in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1447. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01447
Received
11 May 2017
Accepted
03 August 2017
Published
21 August 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited by
Keqiang Wu, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Reviewed by
Yongjun Lin, Huazhong Agricultural University, China; Zhicheng Dong, South China Botanical Garden (CAS), China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Chen, Cheng, Hu, Guo, Chen, Lin, Hu, Bellizzi, Lu, Wang, Wang, Chen and Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zonghua Wang, wangzh@fafu.edu.cn Songbiao Chen, songbiao_chen@hotmail.com Feng Wang, wf@fjage.org
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.
This article was submitted to Plant Genetics and Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.