Abstract
Rhamnolipids (RLs) are amphiphilic molecules naturally produced by some bacteria with a large range of biological activities. Although some studies report their potential interest in plant protection, evaluation of their effects and efficiency on annual crops of worldwide agronomic interest is lacking. The main objective of this work was to investigate their elicitor and protective activities on rapeseed crop species while evaluating their physiological effects. Here we report that RLs from Pseudomonas aeruginosa secretome trigger an effective protection of Brassicanapus foliar tissues toward the fungus Botrytis cinerea involving the combination of plant defense activation and direct antimicrobial properties. We demonstrated their ability to activate canonical B.napus defense responses including reactive oxygen species production, expression of defense genes, along with callose deposits and stomatal closure as efficient physical protections. In addition, microscopic cell death observations and electrolyte leakage measurements indicated that RLs trigger a hypersensitive response-like defense in this plant. We also showed that foliar spray applications of RLs do not induce deleterious physiological consequences on plant growth or chlorophyll content and that RL protective properties are efficient on several grown cultivars of rapeseed. To our knowledge, this is the first report of RLs as an elicitor that suppresses fungal disease on tissues of an annual crop species under greenhouse conditions. Our results highlight the dual mode of action of these molecules exhibiting plant protection activation and antifungal activities and demonstrate their potential for crop cultures as environmental-friendly biocontrol solution.
Introduction
Plants have developed potent defense mechanisms to counter act devastating microbial pathogens. Plant defense systems against phytopathogens can be constitutive or induced. Constitutive resistance includes preformed cuticular waxes, tough cell wall and phytoanticipins (; ). Induced resistance is triggered upon perception by the plant of Invasion Patterns (IPs) originating from the microorganisms or damaged plant tissues (). This IP-triggered resistance is activated through multipurpose intracellular signaling that initiates the synthesis of metabolites and macromolecules. They are characterized by early responses (such as an oxidative burst, kinase phosphorylations, and early transcriptional changes) and late responses (such as late transcriptional changes, and callose deposits) (; ).
Considering the global oilseed production, rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) is in second place just behind soybean in the world, and in first position in Europe (). Rapeseed is exposed to many fungal pathogens severely impacting agricultural yields (). As a consequence, farmers use intensively preventive chemipesticides, mainly applied by foliar spraying, which have deleterious effects on health and environment (). Since rapeseed is essentially cultivated for its oil, used for human nutrition purposes, and as a renewable source for fuels and technical oils, the sustainability of the raw plant material is of great importance (). Given the significance of cultivated areas, the development of biocontrol strategies to reduce the use of chemical pesticides is an essential alternative for the protection of this crop.
Rhamnolipids (RLs) are glycolipids produced by bacteria of the genera Pseudomonas and Burkholderia. These amphiphilic compounds are composed of one or two rhamnose glycosyl polar heads linked through a beta-glycosidic bond to one or two 3-hydroxyfatty acid hydrophobic tails (). In bacteria, they are involved in surface motility, biofilm development and the uptake and degradation of poorly soluble substrates (). RLs are well known as biosurfactant used for a wide range of industrial applications, especially in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical formulations, as well as in bioremediation of pollutants ().
For years, RLs have been extensively studied for their direct antimicrobial activities as reviewed in . They were first described as having properties against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. They were also shown to possess antifungal activities toward oomycetes, ascomycetes and zygomycetes. Plant defense eliciting activities have been reported only recently in grapevine () and Arabidopsis thaliana (). RLs were also shown to trigger resistance of cherry tomato fruits toward Alternaria alternata (). Due to their antimicrobial and defense eliciting properties, RLs are likely to possess potential applications in agriculture (). Reducing production costs by using raw materials such as industrial waste or byproducts demonstrate the economic potential of these compounds (; ). In addition, their low toxicity and biodegradability assets reinforce their attractiveness (; ). However, studies evaluating RL effectiveness on annual crop plants and assessing their impact on plant physiology are missing.
In order to consider RLs as a part of biocontrol strategies, the objective of this study was to investigate the ability of RLs to set up rapeseed protection and canonical defense responses against the opportunistic phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea, the causal agent of gray mold, used here as a model. The effects were studied at molecular and physiological levels.
Materials and Methods
Biological Materials and Culture Conditions
Brassica napus cultivar Darmor-bzh seeds were obtained from the BrACySol Resource Center (INRA, Rennes, France). Atenzo and Gaspard cultivars were kindly provided by Limagrain (Saint-Beauzire, France) and SERASEM (Paris, France), respectively. Plants were cultivated in soil in controlled conditions (18°C, 16-h photoperiod, 400 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity, 70% relative humidity). For in vitro grown seedlings, seeds were first surface sterilized 4 min in 70% ethanol and 15 min in 25% commercial bleach supplemented with 0.01% Tween 20 v/v. Seedlings were grown at 21°C, 60% relative humidity, 150 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity with a 12-h photoperiod in plant growth medium [Murashige & Skoog basal medium (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States), 0.5 g L−1 MES (2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid), and 5 g L−1 sucrose] solidified with agar (7 g L−1) and equilibrated to pH 5.7.
Botrytis cinerea strain B630 (INRA, Versailles, France) was cultivated by transferring a piece of agar containing mycelium on potato dextrose agar (Sigma–Aldrich), incubated at 18°C with a 16-h photoperiod. Conidia were collected with sterile water (2 mL) from 4-week-old culture plates and diluted to reach the appropriate concentration after counting with a Fuch-Rosenthal chamber.
Treatment Solution Preparations and Analyzes
The RLs used in this study were a mix of 40% of α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-β-hydroxydecanoyl-β-hydroxy-decanoate (monoRLs) and 60% of 2-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-β-L-rhamnopyr-anosyl-β-hydroxydecanoyl-β-hydroxydecanoate (diRLs) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa secretome (). Based on this composition with an average molecular weight of 591.6 g mol−1, a 0.6 g mL−1 solution was calculated to 1 M RL solution. A 11.8 μg mL−1 RL stock solution (ca. 20 mM) was prepared in 100% ethanol and diluted in water before treatments. According to sensitivity constraints of the different experiments, and taking into account the practical feasibility for applications, the two RL concentrations, 0.006 mg mL−1 (ca. 10 μM) and 0.06 mg mL−1 (ca. 100 μM), were used. Final ethanol concentration in RL treatment solutions was always lower or equal to 0.5% v/v with the same amount of ethanol in control and RL treatment solutions. The peptide flg22 (QRLSTGSRINSAKDDAAGLQIA) was synthesized by Proteogenix (Schiltigheim, France). The stock was diluted in water at 1 mM.
The scattered intensity in function of RL concentration was studied by dynamic light scattering measurements at 25.0 ± 0.3 °C with a laser emitting at 660 nm (DynaProNanostar, Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, United States) to evaluate their aggregation behavior (). Measurements were carried out using a Dynamics 7.1.7 software (Wyatt Technology). 30–200 acquisitions were performed with an acquisition time ranging from 5 to 10 s according to the sample. The different auto-correlation functions obtained were fitted by a Dynals algorithm. Experiments were replicated three times to ensure reproducibility.
Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Intermediate Production
Measurements of reactive oxygen species were performed on half 9-mm disks prepared with a cork-borer from leaves of 4-week-old plants using a method adapted from . The day before the experiment, disks were placed in water in a 96 wells plate. The day of measurements, the water was replaced by 180 μL of 20 μg mL−1 horseradish peroxidase and 0.2 μM luminol (Sigma-Aldrich). After 6 min, 20 μL of treatment solutions were added through injectors of a luminometer (TECAN Infinite® M1000, Männedorf, Switzerland). Luminescence was monitored for 2 h with relative light unit (RLU) measurements every 2 min. Data corresponded to a mean of four independent biological repetitions obtained from six foliar disks.
RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analyzes
For gene expression quantifications, three 2-day-old in vitro grown seedlings per condition were transferred to 950 μL of liquid growth medium the day before treatment. The next day, 50 μL of treatment solution were added to the medium until harvest time. RNA extractions were proceeded with the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA concentrations and qualities were determined and checked with a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) and a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). Reverse transcriptions were performed using MMuLV enzyme (ThermoFisher) on 4 μg RNA. Quantitative PCR were carried out using SYBR green master mix and a LightCycler® 480 (Roche, Bâle, Switzerland) according to . Reference gene BnELF5 was chosen for its stability in our conditions among seven genes tested using the GeNorm software (). F (Forward) and R (Reverse) primer sequences in 5′ to 3′ orientation were: F GGACTCATCGTTTGGTTCTTCTTTT R CGTTTTGGTTACGCTATGAACAGTC for BnWRKY33, F GAGATGTGGTTCCTCCACCA R ACTTGAGCCCTCGAAGAAGC for BnMPK3 and F GCCAATGTGTTACACCGAGATC R CCGAAATCCCCAAGCTTTAGA for BnMPK4; () F ATGCCAACGCTCACAACCA R CACGGGACCTACGCCTACT for BnPR1, F CATCACCCTTCTCTTCGCTGC R ATGTCCCACTTGACCTCTCGC forBnPDF1.2 (); F TGGACCACCACCTATGATGA R GCTGCGGATTCTCTTCTGAC for EFL5 (); F CTTGGTTTCGATGAC GCAGAGC R CGACGTTGGTGCTGGAGATTTAC for BnMYC2 (); F CACCGCTCCGTGAAGTTAGATA R ACCCCAAAAGCTCCTCAAGGTA for BnERF1 () and F GATTTGAGAGCCGTGAGTGC R CATTGCTGCATTGGTCCACA for BnPR4. The two last primers were designed using Primer3web© version 4.0.0 (). All primers were synthetized by Eurofins Genomics (Luxembourg). Results were obtained from three biologically independent replicates. CT (crossing threshold) and PCR efficiency (E) values were used to calculate expression using the formula ET(CTC−CTRL)/ER(CTC−CTRL), where T was the target gene and R was the reference gene, C refered to cDNA from the control plants and RL refered to cDNA from the treated plants. The relative expression corresponded to the value obtained for RL-treated plants relative to the value obtained for control plants.
Stomatal Aperture Measurements
Foliar disks (7 mm in diameter) from 3 to 4-week-old plants were prepared with a cork-borer and immersed in RL or control solutions. After 3 h, disks were placed on glass slides and observed under a scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Auto-fluorescence of chlorophyll was observed using laser emissions at 638 and 488 nm. The images were optimized by scanning in XY mode while adjusting laser transmissivity and voltage of photomultiplier tubes. Then, in XYZ mode, Z-scans were performed. Three-dimensional reconstructions of images were done using ZEN 2.3 SP1 software (Carl Zeiss). The width of the stomatal aperture was measured using ImageJ software1. Aperture corresponded to the minor axis of an ellipse fitted on each stoma. A total of at least 140 stomata from 10 disks of 10 different plants per condition were used for average and standard error determinations.
Callose Deposition Colorations
Ten-day-old to fifteen-day-old B. napus plants (two leaves stage) were sprayed with treatment solutions (1 mL for each plant). Leaves were harvested after 24 h and submerged into a 1/3 acetic acid/ethanol (v/v) solution for 12 h. Leaves were rinsed 30 min in 150 mM K2HPO4 before being transferred for 12 h in a 0.01% methyl blue (w/v) solution in the same buffer. Tainted leaves were embedded in 50% glycerol and observed with an epifluorescence microscope Leica DMI 6000B (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a DAPI filter. Callose was quantified from photographs using ImageJ software as the number of callose corresponding pixels relative to the total number of pixels covering plant material. Contrast settings of the photographs were adjusted to obtain an optimal separation of the callose signal from the background signal. At least, 25 photographs from three independent experiments were used for average and standard error determinations.
Electrolyte Leakage and Cell Viability Assessments
Foliar disks (7 mm in diameter, 4 per condition) from different 3-week-old plants were immersed in 3 mL of deionized water over night in 12 wells plate. The next day, water was replaced by 1 mL of RL or control solutions. The conductivity was measured over time on 100 μL with a conductimeter LAQUAtwin B-771 (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). The solution was thereafter returned to the cell plate. Conductivity values were determined as the difference to initial measurement and were obtained from three biologically independent replicates. Cell viability measurements were performed with Evans blue method from . After treatment, disks were stained 30 min in 0.25% (w/v) Evans blue, 0.1 M CaCl2 solution under stirring, then rinsed 3 times with 0.1 M CaCl2, pH 5.6, and observed under light microscopy. For quantification, the wounded periphery of disks was removed by cutting a 6 mm disk from each original one. Number of colored cells were reported to the disk surfaces on four leaf disks per condition. Results corresponded to averages and standard errors from three biologically independent repetitions.
Plant Protection Assays and Aniline Blue Colorations
Foliar disks (36 per condition) of 12 mm diameter from 4-week-old plants were submerged 30 min into RLs or control solution. The disks were briefly vacuum infiltrated to maintain the solutions on hydrophobic leaf surfaces (this was particularly necessary for the control disks without surfactant RLs). B. cinerea conidia were diluted to a 106 mL−1 spore solution. Disks were then disposed in petri dishes on a wet filter paper, slightly wounded in the middle with a tip and inoculated with 5 μl of conidia. Lesions (one per disk) were observed with a binocular microscope 96 and 192 h after treatment. They were classified according to their area measurement. Results were expressed in percentage of foliar disks developing each category of lesions. Data were from one representative experiment among three independent repetitions. Aniline blue colorations of mycelium were adapted from and . Foliar disks were fixed and stored in 1/3 lactoglycerol (10 mL lactic acid/20 mL glycerol/10 mL water)/96% ethanol (v/v). Before observations, disks were placed in 1/3 acetic acid/96% ethanol (v/v) until total discoloration. The tissues were stained by transferring to 1/2 lactoglycerol blue (50 mg methyl blue in 40 mL lactoglycerol)/96 % ethanol (v/v) for 1 min. The disks were then rinsed and observed in 50% glycerol (v/v).
B. cinerea Conidia Germination and Mycelium Growth Inhibition Determinations
For germination assays, 1.3 106 mL−1 conidia were cultivated in liquid potato dextrose broth medium (Sigma-Aldrich) without shaking at 21°C in the dark. Germ tube appearing was counted under a light microscope over time after RL addition. For mycelium growth inhibition assays, 5.5 mm diameter mycelium plugs from B. cinerea were excised from V8 agar medium (16% V8 juice v/v, 2.4 g L−1 CaCO3, 16 g L−1 agar) and transferred to the center of new Petri dishes (diameter 9 cm) containing 0.06 mg mL−1 RLs or not. For each plate, mycelium radial growth was determined by measuring two perpendicular diameters. The values corresponded to the average of measurements from three independent plates for each condition. For each plate, the percent of growth inhibition (I) corresponded to the formula:
GrC related to the growth of the control and GrRL the growth of the RL treated plates. Measurements were stopped after 144 h to avoid side effects.
Seedling Growth and Chlorophyll Content Measurements
For in vitro growth inhibition tests, 2-day-old seedlings were transferred to petri dishes containing agar growth medium supplemented with RL or control solutions. Length measurements and studies of fresh weight were done on day 7. Values corresponded to the average of measurements from three independent experiments (24 plants per condition). For quantifying spray effect, 3-day-old in vitro grown seedlings were transferred to a hydroponic culture system (Araponics, Liege, Belgium) containing liquid growth medium. On day 4, the aerial part of seedlings was sprayed until flow with RL solution. Pictures were taken on day 10 to allow root length measurement with ImageJ software. Aerial part and roots were weighted separately as fresh material and lyophilised over night before being weighted as dry material. For chlorophyll content quantification, samples were prepared by extraction of homogenized fresh aerial parts in 80% acetone (v/v) at laboratory temperature and analyzed at wavelengths 663, 646, and 470 nm on a spectrophotometer Cary 60 UV-Vis (Agilent Technologies). Concentrations were determined according to and corresponded to the mean of three independent experiments (18 plants per condition).
Statistical Analyses
Statistical differences in the plant tissue protection assays, seedling growth and chlorophyll content measurements were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis test (P < 0.01). One-way ANOVA tests were performed for qRT-PCR analyzes (α = 0.05), stomatal aperture and callose deposit measurements (α = 0.01). Distinct groups were designated by different letters.
Results
Before experiments on plants, the aggregation state of RLs was analyzed at 25°C by dynamic light scattering measurements. A critical aggregation concentration of ca. 10 μM (0.006 ± 0.001 mg mL−1) was obtained (Supplementary Figure S1A). Plant protective effects of RLs were previously observed from the hundred micromolar range (; ). The RL solutions used in this study were 0.006 mg mL−1 (ca. 10 μM) and 0.06 mg mL−1 (ca. 100 μM). At both concentrations, RLs were under aggregation state with average diameters of mainly 120 nm and 200 nm respectively. Aggregates of 40 nm and 55 nm were also present in a lesser extend in both solutions respectively (Supplementary Figure S1B).
FIGURE 1
RL Protection of B. napus Foliar Discs Against B. cinerea
In order to evaluate the potential of RLs to efficiently protect B. napus against the opportunistic pathogen B. cinerea, leaf tissue infections were performed. Foliar disks from 3 to 4 week-old plants of the sequenced reference cultivar B. napus Darmor-bzh () were first submerged in 0.006 mg mL−1, 0.06 mg mL−1 RL or control solutions and then inoculated with conidia. After 96 h, all the non-RL-treated foliar disks presented symptoms due to pathogen infections with different size areas: (i) starting lesions, less than 1 mm2, appeared on 3%, (ii) distinct lesions, between 1 and 2 mm2, on 80%, (iii) important lesions on 17% of the disks (Figures 1A,B). Mycelium staining with aniline blue confirmed the size of the lesions observed (Figure 1B). Ninety seven percent of the 0.006 mg mL−1 RL-treated disks presented symptoms after 96 h with 83% of starting lesions and 14% of distinct lesions but no important lesions. On the contrary, 17% of the 0.06 mg mL−1 RL-treated disks did not present any symptoms and, the remaining 83% developed only starting lesions (Figure 1A). No distinct or important lesions (more than 2 mm2) were observed on the 0.06 mg mL−1 RL-treated foliar disks after 192 h, whereas they represented 97% of the control foliar disks and 60% of the 0.006 mg mL−1 RL-treated foliar disks. A very limited evolution of lesions was visible on the 0.06 mg mL−1 RL-treated disks between 96 and 192 h showing the durability of the RL effect in these conditions. Aniline blue staining clearly showed a decrease of mycelium development (Supplementary Figure S2). Hence, a relevant number reduction of B. cinerea pathogenic lesions was observed after a pretreatment of foliar disks with RLs as compared to non-pretreated disks. Their size were decreased and their evolution slowed down in a concentration-dependent manner.
As responses to different IPs are known to be genotype dependent (), protection assays were performed on Atenzo (oleaginous) and Gaspard (erucic) cultivars, grown for alimentary and industrial purposes, respectively. After 96 h, all non-RL-treated foliar disks presented symptoms due to pathogen infection for both genotypes (Figures 1C,D). The lesion development was more severe on leaves from the Atenzo cultivar with 36% of important lesions after 96 h, and 72% after 192 h, compared to 18% after 96 h and 22% after 192 h on Gaspard leaves. A treatment with 0.06 mg mL−1 RLs delayed pathogenic lesion appearing and reduced their number and size with more than 40% of leaves showing no lesion after 192 h and no distinct and important lesion development for both genotypes. The effect of RLs was stable over time.
Early and Late Defense Responses Induced by RLs in B. napus Foliar Discs
Different defense-inducing activities of RLs were then investigated on Darmor-bzh foliar disks from 3 to 4-week-old plants.
The monitoring of extracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation with a luminol-based experiment is classically used for IP activity detection on diverse plants including B. napus (). To assess the possibility of an early elicitation of B. napus by RLs, foliar disks were treated with RL solutions and monitored for the production of ROS over 74 min. A rapid oxidative burst was observed (Figure 2A), showing two extrema just before 20 and 40 min with decreasing intensities (Figure 2B) and demonstrating the responsiveness of rapeseed to RLs. In the same conditions, the well characterized IP flg22 derived from bacterial flagellin () triggered a single ROS production after 20 min (Supplementary Figure S3A).
FIGURE 2
Stomata are the gate allowing infection for many pathogens like B. cinerea () and stomatal closure is part of the innate immune response triggered by IPs and micro-organisms in A. thaliana (). To study the effect of RLs on stomata, B. napus foliar disks were incubated with RL or control solutions for 3 h before microscopy observations. Stomatal aperture was measured and means of 4.6 ± 0.02 μm for control, 3.4 ± 0.07 μm for 0.006 mg mL−1 RL and 1.9 ± 0.04 μm for 0.06 mg mL−1 RL solutions were obtained, showing a clear stomatal closure response depending on RL concentration (Figures 2C,D).
Plant immune responses induced by elicitors or pathogens can sometimes lead to a hypersensitive response (HR) establishment (). Electrolyte leakage by conductivity measurements is commonly used to quantify changes in membrane permeability triggered by microbes or IPs in plants. It is a classical method to assess HR induction (). Foliar disks of B. napus leaves incubated in RL solutions showed significantly increased conductivity values a few minutes after adding compounds with a dose-dependent effect (Figure 2E). Evans blue staining of leaf tissues followed by microscopic observations revealed some individual dead cells or micro-lesions composed of 2–3 cells, 24 h after RL adding, depending on the concentration (Figures 2F,G). This suggests that RLs stimulated localized HR-like lesion formation in leaf tissues.
Defense Gene Induction in B. napus Seedlings Upon RL Treatment
To study the capability of RLs to induce a large array of plant defense responses in B. napus, we analyzed the expression of early and late defense marker genes. As leaf disks were not an appropriate system to study the expression of belated genes due to RNA degradations, 3-day-old seedlings were challenged with RLs.
The expression of the transcription factor BnWRKY33 as well as BnMPK3 and BnMPK4 as signaling MAP Kinase genes, all known as effective early markers of IP responses () was quantified. We observed a light induction of BnWRKY33 3 h after addition of 0.006 mg mL−1 RLs with a relative expression to the control condition around 1.9 (Figure 3A). BnMPK3, BnMPK4, and BnWRKY33 were induced after addition of 0.06 mg mL−1 RLs (approximatively 2, 1.5, and 7 times respectively). The expressions of BnPR1, BnPR4, BnPDF1.2 were also quantified. These genes are homologous to AtPR1, AtPR4 and AtPDF1.2, whose expression is induced in A. thaliana RL-treated plants (). AtPR1 is a salicylic acid (SA) specific marker (). AtPR4 and AtPDF1.2 are markers of the cross-talk between jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET) (). The expressions of BnERF1 (marker of ET/JA pathways) () and BnMYC2 (marker of JA pathway) () were also evaluated. Weak inductions of BnPR1, BnPR4 and BnERF1 were observed 24 h after the 0.006 mg mL−1 RL treatment with a relative expression to the control condition around 2 (Figure 3B). Inductions around 9 for BnPR1, 7 for BnPR4, 1.5 for BnPDF1.2 and 7 for BnERF1 were measured after addition of 0.06 mg mL−1 RLs. No induction of BnMYC2 was detected in our conditions.
FIGURE 3
Callose Synthesis in B. napus Leaves Upon RL Spray
Callose containing cell-wall appositions are proficient barriers against pathogen invasions and are a matrix for antimicrobial compounds providing targeted delivery of chemical defenses at the cellular sites of attack (). This β-(1,3)-glucan amorphous polymer is a marker of IP-triggered immunity in A. thaliana and in B. napus (; ). In order to evaluate the production of this physical protection by RLs, young B. napus plants with two well-developed leaves were sprayed with RL or control solutions and the leaves were stained with methyl blue before microscopic observations. This way of treatment was chosen in order to test at the same time the sensitivity of B. napus toward RLs in closer conditions to field conditions. RLs were applied at 0.06 mg mL−1 as the most efficient and stable concentration used in the protection assays. Visible deposits of callose were observed 24 h after treatments in RL-treated cotyledons and leaves. Callose appositions were particularly visible in vessel elements (Figure 4A) as observed for flg22 in same conditions (Supplementary Figure S3B). A mean of 0.19 ± 0.04% pixels of pictures, corresponded to callose, was measured in treated leaves or cotyledons, while it represented only 0.03 ± 0.01% on non-treated leaves (Figure 1C). Twelve-day-old plants of Atenzo and Gaspard genotypes were also sprayed with RL or control solutions and methyl blue leaf colorations were performed. Clear deposits of callose were visible 24 h after treatment while none were visible in controls (Figure 4B). Similarly to what was observed on Darmor-bzh genotype, callose appositions were visible in vessel elements. A mean around 0.2% of callose deposits was observed on treated leaves for all cultivars (Figure 4C). No significant differences were observed between the responses of Darmor-bzh, Atenzo and Gaspard.
FIGURE 4
RL Antifungal Activities
As RLs delay B. cinerea conidia germination and inhibit mycelial growth at 0.1 mg mL−1in vitro (), the direct antimicrobial effect of 0.06 mg mL−1 RLs was evaluated. Conidia germination and mycelial growth were quantified in appropriate conditions. The ratio of germinated to non-germinated spores was slightly higher in control as compared to the RL-treated condition several hours after treatment. Nevertheless, all conidia germinated in the presence of RLs after 24 h (Figures 5A,B). Petri dishes with V8 agar medium supplemented with same amount of RLs were inoculated with agar-mycelium plugs and the mycelium growth inhibition was measured over 6 days. In these conditions, a clear effect was observed with a maximum of 54 ± 2.7% of growth inhibition as compared to the control after 24 h (Figure 5C).
FIGURE 5
Impact of RL Treatments on B. napus Early Development and Chlorophyll Content
Elicitors are known to promote defense mechanisms at the expense of growth, and thus the measurement of growth inhibition of seedlings has been proposed to evaluate the activation of an immune response in Arabidopsis or B. napus (). In order to estimate the RL impact on rapeseed early development, the compounds were first added to the agar growth medium of 3-day-old seedlings grown vertically. After 4 days, the root length of the control seedlings was measured (3.34 ± 0.14 cm long). The addition of RLs at 0.006 mg mL−1 had no effect on root development. However, 0.06 mg mL−1 of RLs inhibited growth by 1.5 times (2.19 ± 0.10 cm long) (Figure 6A). This RL concentration also had a repercussion on root and aerial part fresh weights, reducing them approximately 1.5 times. These effects had no consequence on dry weights and chlorophyll contents (Figures 6B–D).
FIGURE 6
Rhamnolipids effect was subsequently evaluated on 4-day-old seedlings sprayed with both concentrations and grown in hydroponic conditions. Root length was measured 6 days later and showed no impact of RL treatments (Figure 7A). Fresh and dry weights of roots and aerial parts were also compared without any effect (Figures 7B,C). Chlorophyll quantifications were performed after treatments and small increases were observed with differences not sufficient to be relevant (Figure 7D). No macroscopic symptoms could be monitored on leaves after spraying RLs (Supplementary Figure S4).
FIGURE 7
Discussion
In this study, the potential of RLs produced by P. aeruginosa to protect B. napus tissues against the ascomycete B. cinerea and to stimulate defense responses were evaluated. Direct applications of 0.006 and 0.06 mg mL−1 RLs on foliar disks triggered a resistance against the phytopathogenic fungus by delaying the development of a reduced number of lesions. Furthermore, they were clearly less severe compared to non-treated tissues especially in the case of a 0.06 mg mL−1 RL treatment with a stable effect over time. The observation of rapid ROS production, defense gene expression, stomatal closure and electrolyte leakage, clearly demonstrate an early perception of RLs by rapeseed. Late defense responses including the induction of genes involved in defense protein production (PR1, PR4, PDF1.2) and callose deposits were also activated after RL sensing. The direct anti-mycelial growth effect could therefore participate in the delayed and limited evolution of lesions in planta, as 30% of mycelial growth inhibition was observed in plate experiments with 0.06 mg mL−1 RLs. However, the anti-germinative property could not be responsible for the observed diminution of the number of lesions because all conidia germinated in germination medium after 24 h at the same RL concentration. The beneficial effect of RLs observed on foliar tissues inoculated with B. cinerea conidia could therefore combine RL eliciting activities and antifungal effects as it has been suggested for Arabidopsis protection ().
We show here for the first time the establishment of plant physical protective mechanisms like callose deposition and stomatal closure triggered by RLs, and involved in the efficient plant protection observed. In Arabidopsis, the transcription of AtWRKY33 is required for resistance to the fungal pathogen B. cinerea () and phosphorylation of a transcription factor by MPK3/MPK6 regulates this fungal resistance (). In a same way, the overexpression of BnMPK4 is known to enhance resistance to B. cinerea in B. napus (). Hence, the overexpression of BnWRKY33, BnMPK3, BnMPK4 measured here could suggest a role of the corresponding proteins in the protection mechanisms observed. It should be noticed that in Arabidopsis the MPK3/MPK6 cascade activation is necessary to induce the stomatal closure triggered by IPs (). The stomatal closure induced by RLs in rapeseed could be linked to the BnMPK3 overexpression.
Rhamnolipids induce expression of BnPR1, BnPR4 and weakly induce BnPDF1.2 genes 24 h after treatment as previously described in Arabidopsis with the homologous genes (). This suggests that RLs could trigger defense responses dependent on both SA and JA/ET pathways in B. napus in connection with the induction of BnWRKY33 3 h after treatment. Indeed, in Arabidopsis AtWRKY33 is an actor of the crosstalk between SA and JA pathway, and its absence has been shown to favor the SA pathway (). The induction of BnERF1 by RLs without effect on BnMYC2 expression suggests that plant defense responses favor the ET pathway.
To date, RL mode of action as antimicrobial compound is not elucidated. Their aggregation behavior could be related to their antifungal activities (). On Alternaria alternata, microscopy observations revealed that RLs cause morphological structure alterations in the hyphae, probably due to increased cell permeability with DNA and protein leakages (). More generally, RL inhibition of pathogenic bacteria and fungi have been mainly associated with damage of the microbial cell membrane, reduction of the spore motility and spore collapse (). The biosurfactant property of RLs is then supposed to confer the ability to intercalate into and disrupt the zoospore plasma membrane (). It should be noticed that a mycelium growth inhibition around 30% was obtained with 60 μg mL−1 RLs on B. cinerea in our experiments and with 125 μg mL−1 RLs on A. alternate (, ), confirming that RL antimycelial efficacy is dependent on the pathogen as reviewed by .
Size of aggregates that we determined in RL solutions are greater than plant cell wall pores which are around 5 nm (). Nevertheless, the plant could perceive RLs sprayed on foliar tissues, as shown by callose colorations. Indeed, in this way of treatment there is no wounding of the plant tissues. Thus, neither the foliar wax, particularly thick in rapeseed (), nor the cell wall, prevent RL perception. Wax diffusion is probably linked to the biosurfactant properties of RLs and their ability to enhance foliar penetration ().
Such a biphasic ROS profile, as obtained with RLs, is not classically described with other IPs, which induce a transient ROS burst a few minutes after treatment (). We should notice that ROS measurements are usually done on durations shorter than 1 h, but such a ROS production kinetic is not obtained with flg22 on rapeseed in our conditions (Supplementary Figure S3A). Very recently, a second long-lasting ROS profile has been described in Arabidopsis with lipopolysaccharides, well-known IPs from gram-negative bacteria. However in that case, the second burst reached a peak after 3–10 h and was significantly higher than the first one (). It seems that ROS response is plant- and elicitor-dependent and the profile described here appears to be a RL signature in rapeseed. The two aggregated forms of RLs in solutions (Supplementary Figure S1B) might explain the two extremums observed implicating a possible short perception delay. Nevertheless it should be noted here that local pH and electrolyte variations influence RL aggregation (). The RL affinity for membrane lipids () should also impact the RL distribution and perception around the plant cell membrane. Currently, the way the plants sense RLs needs further studies.
The replication of experiments on other cultivars than the sequenced Darmor-bzh was clearly necessary since responses to elicitors has been shown to be genotype dependent (). If Atenzo is a classical oleic cultivar, Gaspard was selected for its high erucic acid content for industrial applications. Since the differences of plant lipid metabolism could influence cuticular wax or cell membrane compositions (; ), the lipid elicitor perception could be affected. The efficiency of RL protective effects on those cultivars show the robustness of their perception by grown cultivars.
The concentration of callose depositions in vessel elements, like induced by RLs, was not previously reported for the canonical IP flg22. However, in our experimental conditions, it was also observed on a positive elicitation control (Supplementary Figure S3B) showing the importance of the system used to report IP activities. Nevertheless, as RLs trigger defense gene induction when introduced in growth medium of seedlings by root absorption, as we performed in defense gene activation measurements, and induce protections like stomatal closure or callose synthesis when applied on leaves, we show here the robustness of their perception by different parts of B. napus plants. RLs could probably be used as well in soil treatments as sprayed on aerial parts in the field as proposed for other elicitors (). The effect on early development reported here when RLs were applied in growth medium confirmed their IP activity (). Though, the study on RL developmental and physiological costs showing no significant reduction of dry weight or chlorophyll content when they were applied by foliar spraying indicates that it is certainly the best way of applying them. RLs could then be a future player of disease biocontrol for rapeseed crop, contributing to the development of sustainable agriculture.
Statements
Author contributions
NM, CS, and SR conceived and designed the experiments. NM, AF, CB, AD, and GM performed the experiments and different measurements. SD, SC, and CC initiated the protection assays and provided the purified mix of RLs. NM, CS, and SR analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors helped with drafting the manuscript and approved the final version.
Funding
This research was supported by the Hauts de France Council and European Regional Development Fund, and was realized in the context of the MAELIA project. Noadya Monnier Ph.D. thesis was co-funded by HdF Council and ERDF. Abdellatif Dahi post doctoral position was funded through a grant in partnership with the SAS PIVERT, within the frame of the French Institute for the Energy Transition (Institut pour la Transition Energétique (ITE) PIVERT (www.institut-pivert.com) as part of the Investments for the Future (“Investissements d’Avenir”), by the French Government under the reference ANR-001-01. Work done in RIBP was supported by the EliDeRham grant from the French Region Grand Est.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank Caroline Boulnois (Service d’Analyse Physicochimique, UTC, Compiègne) for technical assistance in confocal microscopy. We gratefully acknowledge Laurent Gutierrez (Centre de Ressources Régionales en Biologie Moléculaire, UPJV, Amiens) for his welcoming access to molecular biology equipment and greenhouses. We finally thank Stacy Johnson and Adrian Troncoso-Ponce for their careful reading of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer DP and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01170/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
References
1
AbbasiH.HamediM. M.LotfabadT. B.ZahiriH. S.SharafiH.MasoomiF.et al (2012). Biosurfactant-producing bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa MA01 isolated from spoiled apples: physicochemical and structural characteristics of isolated biosurfactant.J. Biosci. Bioeng.113211–219. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.10.002
2
Abdel-MawgoudA. M.LépineF.DézielE. (2010). Rhamnolipids: diversity of structures, microbial origins and roles.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.861323–36. 10.1007/s00253-010-2498-2
3
AliakbariM.RaziH. (2013). Isolation of Brassica napus MYC2 gene and analysis of its expression in response to water deficit stress.Mol. Biol. Res. Commun.263–71. 10.22099/MBRC.2013.1648
4
ArandaF. J.EspunyJ.MarqueA.TeruelA.ManresaÄ.OrtizA. (2007). Thermodynamics of the Interaction of a Dirhamnolipid Biosurfactant Secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa with phospholipid membranes.Langmuir232700–2705. 10.1021/la061464z
5
Babula-SkowrońskaD.LudwikówA.CieślaA.OlejnikA.Cegielska-TarasT.Bartkowiak-BrodaI.et al (2015). Involvement of genes encoding ABI1 protein phosphatases in the response of Brassica napus L. to drought stress.Plant Molecular Biol.88445–457. 10.1007/s11103-015-0334-x
6
Bagheri LotfabadT.EbadipourN.RoostaazadR.PartoviM.BahmaeiM. (2017). Two schemes for production of biosurfactant from Pseudomonas aeruginosa MR01: applying residues from soybean oil industry and silica sol-gel immobilized cells.Colloids Surf.B Biointerfaces152159–168. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.01.024
7
BigeardJ.ColcombetJ.HirtH. (2015). Signaling mechanisms in pattern-triggered immunity (PTI).Mol. Plant8521–539. 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.022
8
BirkenbihlR. P.DiezelC.SomssichI. E. (2012). Arabidopsis WRKY33 is a key transcriptional regulator of hormonal and metabolic responses toward Botrytis cinerea infection.Plant Physiol.159266–85. 10.1104/pp.111.192641
9
BurketováL.TrdáL.OttP.ValentováO. (2015). Bio-based resistance inducers for sustainable plant protection against pathogens.Biotechnol. Adv.33994–1004. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.004
10
ChalhoubB.DenoeudF.LiuS.ParkinI. A. P.TangH.WangX.et al (2014). Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome.Science (80).345950–953. 10.1126/science.1253435
11
ChenJ.WuQ.HuaY.ChenJ.ZhangH.WangH. (2017). Potential applications of biosurfactant rhamnolipids in agriculture and biomedicine.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1018309–8319. 10.1007/s00253-017-8554-4
12
CookD. E.MesarichC. H.ThommaB. P. (2015). Understanding plant immunity as a surveillance system to detect invasion.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.53541–63. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120114
13
DavidsonA. L.Blahut-BeattyL.ItayaA.ZhangY.ZhengS.SimmondsD. (2016). Histopathology of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infection and oxalic acid function in susceptible and resistant soybean.Plant Pathol.65878–887. 10.1111/ppa.12514
14
EladY. (1988). Scanning electron microscopy of parasitism of Botrytis cinerea on flowers and fruits of cucumber.Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.91185–190. 10.1016/S0007-1536(88)80025-1
15
FischerT.ByerleeD.EdmeadesG. (2014).Crop Yields and Global Food Security? Will Yield Increase Continue to Feed the World?Canberra, ACT: ACIAR, 8–11. Available at: https://www.aciar.gov.au/node/12101
16
GillU. S.LeeS.MysoreK. S. (2015). Host versus nonhost resistance: distinct wars with similar arsenals.Phytopathology105580–587. 10.1094/PHYTO-11-14-0298-RVW
17
GraceC.StribleyD. P. (1991). A safer procedure for routine staining of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.Mycol. Res.951160–1162. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80005-1
18
GutierrezL.MongelardG.FlokovaK.PacurarD. I.NovakO.StaswickP.et al (2012). Auxin controls Arabidopsis adventitious root initiation by regulating jasmonic acid homeostasis.Plant Cell242515–27. 10.1105/tpc.112.099119
19
JohannS.SeilerT.-B.TisoT.BluhmK.BlankL. M.HollertH. (2016). Mechanism-specific and whole-organism ecotoxicity of mono-rhamnolipids.Sci. Total Environ.548–549, 155–163. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.066
20
JohanssonO. N.NilssonA. K.GustavssonM. B.BackhausT.AnderssonM. X.EllerströmM. (2015). A quick and robust method for quantification of the hypersensitive response in plants.PeerJ3:e1469. 10.7717/peerj.1469
21
KimB. S.LeeJ. Y.HwangB. K. (2000). In vivo control and in vitro antifungal activity of rhamnolipid B, a glycolipid antibiotic, against Phytophthora capsici and Colletotrichum orbiculare.Pest Manag. Sci.561029–1035. 10.1002/1526-4998(200012)56:12<1029::AID-PS238>3.0.CO;2-Q
22
KumarA.SharmaA.UpadhyayaK. C. (2016). Vegetable Oil: nutritional and industrial perspective.Curr. Genom.17230–40. 10.2174/1389202917666160202220107
23
LebelE.HeifetzP.ThorneL.UknesS.RyalsJ.WardE. (1998). Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controlling PR-1 gene expression in Arabidopsis.Plant J.16223–233. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00288.x
24
LeeS. B.SuhM. C. (2015). Advances in the understanding of cuticular waxes in Arabidopsis thaliana and crop species.Plant Cell Rep.34557–572. 10.1007/s00299-015-1772-2
25
Li-BeissonY.ShorroshB.BeissonF.AnderssonM. X.ArondelV.BatesP. D.et al (2013). Acyl-lipid metabolism.Arabidopsis Book11:e0161. 10.1199/tab.0161
26
LiuH.ShaoB.LongX.YaoY.MengQ. (2016). Foliar penetration enhanced by biosurfactant rhamnolipid.Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces145548–554. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.058
27
LloydS. R.SchoonbeekH.TrickM.ZipfelC.RidoutC. J. (2014). Methods to study PAMP-triggered immunity in Brassica species.Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact.27286–95. 10.1094/MPMI-05-13-0154-FI
28
LorenzoO.ChicoJ. M.Sánchez-SerranoJ. J.SolanoR. (2004). JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 encodes a MYC transcription factor essential to discriminate between different jasmonate-regulated defense responses in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell161938–1950. 10.1105/tpc.022319
29
LorenzoO.PiquerasR.Sánchez-SerranoJ. J.SolanoR. (2003). ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 integrates signals from ethylene and jasmonate pathways in plant defense.Plant Cell15165–178. 10.1105/tpc.007468
30
LuG. (2003). Engineering sclerotinia sclerotiorum resistance in oilseed crops.Afr. J. Biotechnol.2509–516. 10.5897/AJB2003.000-1101
31
LunaE.PastorV.RobertJ.FlorsV.Mauch-ManiB.TonJ. (2011). Callose deposition: a multifaceted plant defense response.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.24183–193. 10.1094/MPMI-07-10-0149
32
MelottoM.UnderwoodW.KoczanJ.NomuraK.HeS. Y. (2006). Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion.Cell126969–980. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.054
33
MengX.XuJ.HeY.YangK.-Y.MordorskiB.LiuY.et al (2013). Phosphorylation of an ERF transcription factor by Arabidopsis MPK3/MPK6 regulates plant defense gene induction and fungal resistance.Plant Cell251126–42. 10.1105/tpc.112.109074
34
PedrasM. S. C.YayaE. E. (2015). Plant chemical defenses: are all constitutive antimicrobial metabolites phytoanticipins?Nat. Prod. Commun.10209–218.
35
RikalovicM. G.VrvicM. M.KaradzicI. M. (2015). Rhamnolipid biosurfactant from Pseudomonas aeruginosa – from discovery to application in contemporary technology.J. Serb. Chem. Soc.80441279–304. 10.2298/JSC140627096R
36
RodriguesA. I.GudiñaE. J.TeixeiraJ. A.RodriguesL. R. (2017). Sodium chloride effect on the aggregation behaviour of rhamnolipids and their antifungal activity.Sci. Rep.7:12907. 10.1038/s41598-017-13424-x
37
Rondeau-MouroC.DeferD.LeboeufE.LahayeM. (2008). Assessment of cell wall porosity in Arabidopsis thaliana by NMR spectroscopy.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.4283–92. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.09.020
38
SanchezL.CourteauxB.HubertJ.KauffmannS.RenaultJ.-H.ClémentC.et al (2012). Rhamnolipids elicit defense responses and induce disease resistance against biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic pathogens that require different signaling pathways in Arabidopsis and highlight a central role for salicylic acid.Plant Physiol.1601630–41. 10.1104/pp.112.201913
39
SánchezM.ArandaF. J.EspunyM. J.MarquésA.TeruelJ. AManresaA. andet al (2007). Aggregation behaviour of a dirhamnolipid biosurfactant secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in aqueous media.J. Colloid Interface Sci.307246–53. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.11.041
40
Shang-GuanK.WangM.Myint Phyu Sin HtweN.LiP.LiY.QiF.et al (2018). Lipopolysaccharides trigger two successive bursts of reactive oxygen species at distinct cellular locations.Plant Physiol.1762543–2556. 10.1104/pp.17.01637
41
SmithJ. M.HeeseA. (2014). Rapid bioassay to measure early reactive oxygen species production in Arabidopsis leave tissue in response to living Pseudomonas syringae.Plant Methods106. 10.1186/1746-4811-10-6
42
StanghelliniM. E.MillerR. M. (1997). Their identity and potencial efficacy in the biological control of zoosporic plant pathogens.Plant Dis.814–12. 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.1.4
43
SuJ.ZhangM.ZhangL.SunT.LiuY.LukowitzW.et al (2017). Regulation of stomatal immunity by interdependent functions of a pathogen-responsive MPK3/MPK6 cascade and abscisic acid.Plant Cell29526–542. 10.1105/tpc.16.00577
44
ThakurM.SohalB. S.SandhuP. S. (2014). Impact of elicitor spray on alternaria blight severity and yield of Brassica juncea and Brassica napus species.J. Oilseed Brassica178–82.
45
ThommaB. P.EggermontK.PenninckxI. A.Mauch-ManiB.VogelsangR.CammueB. P.et al (1998). Separate jasmonate-dependent and salicylate-dependent defense-response pathways in Arabidopsis are essential for resistance to distinct microbial pathogens.Plant Biol.9515107–15111. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15107
46
UntergasserA.CutcutacheI.KoressaarT.YeJ.FairclothB. C.RemmM.et al (2012). Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces.Nucleic Acids Res.40:e115. 10.1093/nar/gks596
47
VandesompeleJ.De PreterK.PattynI.PoppeB.Van RoyN.De PaepeA.et al (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes.Genome Biol.334–1. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034
48
VarnierA.-L.SanchezL.VatsaP.BoudesocqueL.Garcia-BruggerA.RabenoelinaF.et al (2009). Bacterial rhamnolipids are novel MAMPs conferring resistance to Botrytis cinerea in grapevine.Plant. Cell Environ.32178–193. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01911.x
49
VatsaP.SanchezL.ClémentC.BaillieulF.DoreyS. (2010). Rhamnolipid biosurfactants as new players in animal and plant defense against microbes.Int. J. Mol. Sci.115095–108. 10.3390/ijms11125095
50
VermaS. S.YajimaW. R.RahmanM. H.ShahS.LiuJ.-J.EkramoddoullahA. K. M.et al (2012). A cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptide from Pinus monticola (PmAMP1) confers resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in canola (Brassica napus).Plant Mol. Biol.7961–74. 10.1007/s11103-012-9895-0
51
VetterM. M.KronholmI.HeF.HawekerH.ReymondM.BergelsonJ.et al (2012). Flagellin perception varies quantitatively in Arabidopsis thaliana and its relatives.Mol. Biol. Evol.291655–1667. 10.1093/molbev/mss011
52
VijayaraghavareddyP.AdhinarayanreddyV.VemannaR. S.SreemanS.MakarlaU. (2017). Quantification of membrane damage/cell death using evan’s blue staining technique.Bio-Protoc7:e2519. 10.21769/BioProtoc.2519
53
WangZ.MaoH.DongC.JiR.CaiL.FuH.et al (2009). Overexpression of Brassica napus MPK4 enhances resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in oilseed rape.Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact.22235–244. 10.1094/MPMI-22-3-0235
54
WellburnA. R. (1994). The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution.J. Plant Physiol.144307–313. 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2
55
YanF.HuH.LuL.ZhengX. (2016). Rhamnolipids induce oxidative stress responses in cherry tomato fruit to Alternaria alternata.Pest Manage. Sci.721500–1507. 10.1002/ps.4177
56
YanF.XuS.GuoJ.ChenQ.MengQ.ZhengX. (2015). Biocontrol of post-harvest Alternaria alternata decay of cherry tomatoes with rhamnolipids and possible mechanisms of action.J. Sci. Food Agric.951469–1474. 10.1002/jsfa.6845
57
YangH.LiuJ.HuangS.GuoT.DengL.HuaW. (2014). Selection and evaluation of novel reference genes for quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) based on genome and transcriptome data in Brassica napus L.Gene538113–122. 10.1016/j.gene.2013.12.057
58
ZhengZ.QamarS. A.ChenZ.MengisteT. (2006). Arabidopsis WRKY33 transcription factor is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens.Plant J.48592–605. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02901.x
Summary
Keywords
Rhamnolipids, Brassica napus, elicitor, defense responses, plant immunity, biocontrol
Citation
Monnier N, Furlan A, Botcazon C, Dahi A, Mongelard G, Cordelier S, Clément C, Dorey S, Sarazin C and Rippa S (2018) Rhamnolipids From Pseudomonas aeruginosa Are Elicitors Triggering Brassica napus Protection Against Botrytis cinerea Without Physiological Disorders. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1170. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01170
Received
23 April 2018
Accepted
23 July 2018
Published
08 August 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Simone Ferrari, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy
Reviewed by
Elodie Vandelle, Università degli Studi di Verona, Italy; Daniela Pontiggia, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Monnier, Furlan, Botcazon, Dahi, Mongelard, Cordelier, Clément, Dorey, Sarazin and Rippa.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sonia Rippa, sonia.rippa@utc.fr
This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.