Skip to main content


Front. Plant Sci., 25 July 2019
Sec. Plant Cell Biology
This article is part of the Research Topic Chromatin Stability and Dynamics: Targeting and Recruitment of Chromatin Modifiers View all 10 articles

Deregulated Phosphorylation of CENH3 at Ser65 Affects the Development of Floral Meristems in Arabidopsis thaliana

  • 1Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, Germany
  • 2Centre of Plant Structural and Functional Genomics, Institute of Experimental Botany Academy of Sciences, Olomouc, Czechia
  • 3Department of Plant Biology, Uppsala BioCenter and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 4Independent Researcher, Plankstadt, Germany

Several histone variants are posttranslationally phosphorylated. Little is known about phosphorylation of the centromere-specific histone 3 (CENH3) variant in plants. We show that CENH3 of Arabidopsis thaliana is phosphorylated in vitro by Aurora3, predominantly at serine 65. Interaction of Aurora3 and CENH3 was found by immunoprecipitation (IP) in A. thaliana and by bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Western blotting with an anti-CENH3 pS65 antibody showed that CENH3 pS65 is more abundant in flower buds than elsewhere in the plant. Substitution of serine 65 by either alanine or aspartic acid resulted in a range of phenotypic abnormalities, especially in reproductive tissues. We conclude that Aurora3 phosphorylates CENH3 at S65 and that this post-translational modification is required for the proper development of the floral meristem.


Histone3 (H3) is the best studied histone variant, regarding its post-translational modifications (PTMs). In the centromeric region of most eukaryotic chromosomes, H3 is replaced by CENH3, originally referred to as CENPA in human (Earnshaw and Rothfield, 1985), or as HTR12 in Arabidopsis thaliana (Talbert et al., 2002). The incorporation of CENH3 into centromeric nucleosomes initiates the formation of the kinetochore, a protein complex which enables the microtubules to attach to the centromere (Earnshaw et al., 2013). CENH3 features a well conserved histone fold domain and a highly variable N-terminus. Non-plant CENH3s experience a variety of PTMs. For example, the trimethylation of glycine 1, along with the phosphorylation of serine 16, and serine 18 has been observed in cultured human cells (Bailey et al., 2013; Takada et al., 2017). Of yeast CENH3, the arginine residue 37 can be methylated, serine at position 9, 10, 14, 16, 17, 22, 33, 40, 105, and 154 are phosphorylated, and lysine 49 is acetylated (Samel et al., 2012; Boeckmann et al., 2013; Hoffmann et al., 2018; Mishra et al., 2019). The human CENPA serine 7 is phosphorylated during mitosis by the cell cycle-dependent Aurora kinase (Zeitlin et al., 2001; Kunitoku et al., 2003), an enzyme which can also phosphorylate histone H3 at serine 10 and 28 (Hsu et al., 2000; Kurihara et al., 2006), and the H1 serine residue 27 (Hergeth et al., 2011).

Phosphorylation of CENH3 is likely required for kinetochore function and normal chromosome segregation (Boeckmann et al., 2013; Goutte-Gattat et al., 2013). Phosphorylation of CENH3 at S68 by the cyclin-dependent kinase 1 prevents interaction with the chaperone HJURP which is required for loading of CENH3 to centromeric nucleosomes (Yu et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017). The only documented PTM involving a plant CENH3 is phosphorylation of the maize CENH3 pS50, which has been interpreted as a spindle assembly checkpoint (Zhang et al., 2005). The protein kinase responsible for this phosphorylation has not yet been identified.

Plant Aurora kinases have been classified in two major subgroups, referred to as α and β type Aurora (Demidov et al., 2005; Kawabe et al., 2005; Kato et al., 2011). The A. thaliana genome encodes two α (AtAurora1 and 2) and one β (Aurora3) type Aurora kinases. These kinases are concentrated at the centromeres, and in the phragmoplast at the end of the mitotic cell division. Alignment of plant Auroras with the animal Aurora A and B types (Adams et al., 2001) revealed characteristics of both animal enzyme classes as well as plant-specific features (Demidov et al., 2005). Aurora3 phosphorylates the serine residues 10 and 28 of A. thaliana H3 (Kurihara et al., 2006).

Here, we aimed to elucidate whether A. thaliana CENH3 is phosphorylated by Aurora3. We show that CENH3 is a substrate of Aurora3 and that serine 65 of CENH3 is phosphorylated preferentially in meristematic tissues such as flower buds and flowers. Additionally, we demonstrate that CENH3 pS65 is important for the proper development of reproductive tissues and how the disturbance of CENH3 phosphorylation can in addition impair the growth and development of the whole plant.

Materials and Methods

Plant Growth and Transformation

Ecotype Columbia-0 and heterozygous cenh3-1/CENH3 (Ravi and Chan, 2010) A. thaliana plants were transformed using the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). T1 transformants were selected on Murashige and Skoog solid medium containing the relevant antibiotic(s) and were grown under either a 16 h or an 8 h photoperiod with a day/night temperature regime of 20°C/18°C. Nicotiana benthamiana and Nicotiana tabacum plants were grown under a 12 h photoperiod at a constant temperature of 26°C.

DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted according to Edwards et al. (1991). Selection for the cenh3-1 allele was achieved using a dCAPS marker: the template was amplified using the primer air cenh3-1_mut_for/_rev and the amplicon digested with EcoRV. The amplicon of the 215 bp mutant allele is resistant to digestion, while the Wt allele splits into a 191 bp, and a 24 bp fragments. To distinguish between the endogenous CENH3 copy and the two CENH3 transgenes carrying S65A or S65D, an initial PCR based on the primer pair cenh3-1_mut_for/_mut2429r was performed: the amplicon was then used as a template for a second PCR/dCAPS assay as described above. Primer sequences are given in Supplementary Table S1.

Cloning of Transformation Constructs

To generate CENH3 genomic fragments carrying either S65A or S65D, a genomic fragment of CENH3 with its native 1500 bp-long promotor, inserted in the plasmid pCAMBIA1300 was excised by HindIII/BamHI digestion, and then cloned into pBlueScript II KS (Stratagene). The S65A and S65D mutations were generated in the cloned copy using a Phusion® site-directed mutagenesis kit (Finnzymes1) according to supplier’s protocol; the required 5′-phosphorylated primers were S65_A_for, S65_D_for and S65_A+D_gDNA_rev. The CENH3 S65A and S65D sequences were excised by HindIII/BamHI digestion and re-inserted. To generate the CENH3 S65A and S65D fusions to EYFP, the p35S:CENH3YFP expression cassette (Lermontova et al., 2006) was processed using a Phusion® site-directed mutagenesis kit (Finnzymes): the required primers were S65_A_for, S65_D_for and S65_A+D_cDNA_rev. The expression cassettes (p35S, CENH3YFP-S65, -A65 or -D65 and NOS terminator) were restricted with SfiI and inserted into the pLH7000 vector2. All constructs were verified by sequencing. Primer sequences are given in Supplementary Table S1.

Heterologous Expression in E. coli

Full length CENH3 and Aurora3 cDNAs were amplified using a RevertAid H minus first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific3), and inserted, after removal of the stop codon, into pENTR-D TOPO (Thermo Fisher Scientific, see text footnote 4). The CENH3 open reading frame sequence was amplified using the primer pair CENH3_expr_for/_rev with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Fermentas), and the amplicon inserted into a ChampionTM pET101 Directional TOPO® Expression plasmid (Invitrogen). The sequence of the CENH3 variant carrying the S65A substitution was obtained amplifying the wild-type plasmid with a mutated primer with a Phusion® site-directed mutagenesis kit (Finnzymes) using the primer S65_A_for. The constructs were transformed into E. coli BL21 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences4). The fragment of Aurora3 obtained by PCR based on the primer pair Aurora3G-LP/-RP was inserted into pDest15 (Invitrogen) to create a GST fusion tag and then transformed into E. coli C43 (Lucigen5). An active Aurora3 kinase was synthesized in E. coli as described by Swain et al. (2008). The synthesis of recombinant protein was induced by addition of 1 mM IPTG to the E. coli culture during the exponential growth phase. CENH3 and CENH3 S65A 6xHIS-fusions were purified by passing through a Ni-NTA agarose column (Qiagen6) under denaturing conditions, and dialyzed against urea (Tomaštíková et al., 2015). Recombinant proteins were tested by Coomassie staining of Tris–glycine (Laemmli, 1970) or Tris–tricine (Schagger and von Jagow, 1987) PAAGE. Primer sequences are given in Supplementary Table S1.

In vitro Kinase Assay

The in vitro protein kinase assays of recombinant Aurora3 and the CENH3 variants were performed as described by Karimi-Ashtiyani and Houben (2013). In vitro protein kinase assays of recombinant Aurora3 on CENH3 peptides were performed as described by Demidov et al. (2009). The required CENH3 peptides were synthesized by JPT Peptide Technologies GmbH7. Each in vitro kinase reaction was based on 2 μg peptide.

Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) Constructs and the Detection of Fluorescence

An Aurora3 pENTR-D TOPO construct was generated using the Gateway system (Invitrogen, see text footnote 4) within the binary BiFC plant transformation vectors pSpyce-35S and pSpyne-35S (Walter et al., 2004). Leaves of 2–4 week old either N. benthamiana or N. tabacum plants were infiltrated on their abaxial side with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1 carrying the pCH32 helper plasmid. The p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus was used to suppress gene silencing (Walter et al., 2004). Co-infiltration was performed with equal titers of A. tumefaciens containing either a BiFC construct or the p19 silencing plasmid. The fluorescent protein fusion constructs used as controls for the localization of Aurora3 and CENH3 were previously described (Demidov et al., 2005; Lermontova et al., 2006). The preparation of tissue for confocal fluorescence microscopy followed the methods described by Keçeli et al. (2017). YFP was detected by a LSM780 laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) using a 488 nm laser line for excitation in combination with a 505–550 nm band pass for detection (Lermontova et al., 2013). Specificity of the YFP signal was confirmed by photospectrometric analysis of the fluorescence signal by means of the META detector.

Analysis of Total Plant Protein

Plant tissue (200–300 mg) was powdered in liquid nitrogen and suspended in 0.5 mL 56 mM Na2CO3, 56 mM DTT, 2% w/v SDS, 12% w/v sucrose, and 2 mM EDTA. After holding for 10 min at 70°C, the cell debris was removed by centrifugation. A 30 μg aliquot of each total protein sample was analyzed by 10% PAGE containing acetic acid-urea (Spiker, 1980) or 10% Tris–tricine PAGE (Schagger and von Jagow, 1987) and either stained in Coomassie Blue or electro-transferred onto Immobilon TM PVDF membranes (Millipore8). The membranes were challenged with either anti-A. thaliana CENH3 (Abcam9) or a polyclonal anti-CENH3 pS65 antibody (antibodies were working only for Western blotting but not for indirect immunostaining) produced by Pineda Antibody Service (Berlin, Germany). The latter was raised against a synthetic phosphorylated pS65 residue (± 10 AA) peptide and was purified from serum using immobilized peptides (1, with pS65 residue and 2, with S65 residue). The specificity of the antibody was validated using an ELISA. The membranes were held for 12 h at 4°C in PBS containing 5% w/v low-fat milk powder and a 1:1,000 dilution of polyclonal rabbit anti-CENH3 or anti-CENH3 pS65 and monoclonal mouse H3 (Abcam, see text footnote 10). Bound antibodies were detected by incubation with anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to peroxidase (Sigma10) in a dilution 1:5,000 and visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence assay (Pierce, see text footnote 4).

λ Phosphatase Treatment

Aliquots of ∼100 μg protein were incubated for 1 h at 30°C in 100 μL of a pH 7.5 buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 2mM DTT, 1 mM MnCl2, 0.01% v/v Brij-35 in the presence of 100 U alkaline phosphatase (Sigma), and 4,000 U λ phosphatase (NEB11).

Immunoprecipitation (IP)

The protein preparations required for IP were extracted from 10-day old transgenic seedlings harboring the pCENH3:CENH3:YFP construct in cenh3-1 mutant plants after crosslinking with dithiobis succinimidyl propionate (DSP) for 30 min and 4°C according to the supplier’s (Thermo Fisher ScientificTM PierceTM) protocol. A 10 g sample of plant material was powdered in liquid nitrogen, and then extracted in 50 mL 200 mM Tris–HCl (pH7.5), 1.5 M NaCl, and 0.5% v/v Tween20. After 20 min centrifugation at 4°C and 15000 g, the supernatant was diluted with dH2O 1:10 and incubated with 12 μL GFP-Trap resin (ChromoTek GmbH12) for 4 h at 4°C. The GFP-Trap agarose was rinsed in 1×PBS and eluted according to the supplier’s protocol. A 15 μL aliquot of each protein sample was electrophoretically separated and transferred to a membrane which was then probed with an anti-AtAurora antibody (Demidov et al., 2005). An extract of wild type (Wt) seedling was used as negative control.

Indirect Immunofluorescence

Immunostaining was performed as described by Manzanero et al. (2000). Rabbit antibodies raised against Nicotiana CENPC (Nagaki et al., 2009) and a mouse antibody raised against GFP (Clontech13) were diluted 1:400 in PBS. The binding of the primary antibody was detected by using as a 1:200 diluted secondary antibody of either rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Dianova14) or FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Dianova).

Preparation of Pollen Mother Cells for Meiotic Analysis

Flower buds were fixed and pollen mother cells prepared for microscopy following Sánchez-Morán et al. (2001) with minor modifications. The buds were fixed in Carnoy’s solution (absolute ethanol:chloroform:glacial acetic acid, 6:3:1), rinsed first in 3:1 ethanol:glacial acetic acid, and then in citrate buffer (pH 4.5) at room temperature. They were then softened by digestion in 0.3% w/v pectolyase, 0.3% w/v cytohelicase, and 0.3% w/v cellulase (Sigma) in citrate buffer for 2 h at 37°C. The enzyme mixture was replaced by an ice-cold citrate buffer to stop the reaction. Single buds were transferred onto a clean microscope slide in a drop of citrate buffer and macerated with a fine needle. A 10 μL aliquot of 60% (v/v) glacial acetic acid was added to each slide, which was then dried by laying on a hotplate (42°C) for 1 min, after which again 10 μL 60% (v/v) acetic acid was added, followed by 200 μL of cold 3:1 ethanol:glacial acetic acid. Finally, the slides were air-dried.

Scanning Electron and Light Microscopy

The preparation of tissue sections for scanning electron and light microscopy followed the methods described by Tikhenko et al. (2015).

Alexander Staining

Flowers and flower buds were immersed in 10% ethanol overnight at 10°C, and the anthers were stained following Alexander (1969) for 15 min at room temperature. Estimates of pollen grain numbers per anther were based on the inspection of six anthers per plant.

Accession Numbers

The following line was used: cenh3-1/CENH3 (At1g01370, Ravi and Chan, 2010).


CENH3 Interacts With AtAurora Kinase in vivo

The in vivo interaction between Arabidopsis Aurora and CENH3 was investigated using immunoprecipitation (IP) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC). The former experiment was based on soluble protein isolated from DSP cross-linked A. thaliana seedlings stably expressing CENH3YFP (Lermontova et al., 2006). Western blot analysis of the precipitates eluted from anti-GFP agarose (Figures 1A,B) revealed that a ∼34 kDa product which interacted with Aurora was more abundant in CENH3YFP expressing plants than in the wild type (Wt) controls (Figure 1B). The 65–70 kDa product observed could have been either a dimerized form of Aurora and/or a complex formed with other proteins and stabilized by crosslinking. The corresponding negative control with YFP only does not show signals in the elution fraction (Supplementary Figure S1). In the validating BiFC experiment, YFP-specific signals were detected within the nucleoplasm of infiltrated N. benthamiana cells (Figures 1C,D). A number of pSpyNeAurora3/pSpyCeCENH3 spot-like BiFC signals were observed in the nucleus of infiltrated leaves (Figure 1C, arrowed). The distribution of the BiFC signal differed from that of Aurora3GFP, which was concentrated in the nucleoplasm and around the cell periphery (Supplementary Figure S2A), but was comparable with the distribution of CENH3YFP (Supplementary Figure S2B). Similarly, distinct CENH3YFP fluorescence signals were generated when nuclei isolated from N. tabacum cells transiently expressing CENH3YFP were labeled with antibodies against both YFP and CENPC (Supplementary Figure S2K). None of the negative controls produced a fluorescence signal (Supplementary Figures S2C–J). These results suggest that CENH3 interacts with Aurora3 in planta.


Figure 1. Arabidopsis thaliana CENH3 interacts with Aurora3 kinase. (A,B) Western blot analysis using immuno-precipitated samples of A. thaliana CENH3YFP transformants and Wt plants. (A) Proteins separated by gel electrophoresis and visualized by Coomassie Blue staining. (B) Western blot probed with an anti-AtAurora, or anti-YFP (bottom part) antibodies. The negative control consisted of proteins extracted from Wt plants. (C,D) In vivo interaction of Aurora3 with CENH3 in the nucleoplasm as shown by BiFC in N. benthamiana leaves infiltrated with A. tumefaciens harboring the constructs (C) pSpyCeAurora3/pSpyNeCENH3 and (D) pSpyNeAurora3/pSpyCeCENH3. Some centromeres in (C) are arrowed. Red fluorescence corresponds to the autofluorescence of chlorophyll in the plastids.

Aurora3 Phosphorylates CENH3 in vitro at the Serine 65 Residue

To assess whether Aurora3 can phosphorylate CENH3 in vitro, recombinant Aurora3 and CENH3 were produced in E. coli. Presenting recombinant CENH3 (Supplementary Figure S3A) as the substrate for recombinant active Aurora3 (Supplementary Figure S3B) resulted in the production of kinase activity-dependent Western blot signals (Figure 2A), thus indicating phosphorylation of CENH3. The phosphorylation sites were identified by scanning CENH3 for the putative Aurora kinase phosphorylation motifs (R/K)1-3X(S/T) based on the information available for non-plant Aurora kinases (Dephoure et al., 2008; Gully et al., 2012). The resulting eleven putative target sites (Supplementary Figure S3D), each embedded within an 11–20 residue oligopeptide (Supplementary Figure S3E), were then tested as a potential substrate of Aurora3. Screening of preselected peptides by the in vitro kinase assay showed the strongest phosphorylation signal when the serine 65 residue was present (Figure 2B). This residue locates at the border between the N- terminus and the histone fold domain (Figure 2C). The Aurora3-dependent phosphorylation of the S65 residue was confirmed by showing that an S65A variant of CENH3 (Supplementary Figure S3C), which cannot undergo phosphorylation at this position, was phosphorylated with twofold lower efficiency than Wt CENH3 (Supplementary Figures S4A,B).


Figure 2. Aurora3 phosphorylates CENH3 in vitro. (A) A kinase assay using recombinant CENH3 as substrate. Kinase reactions either without substrate or with no added enzyme were used as negative controls (–). (B) In vitro kinase screening of CENH3 phosphorylation sites based on 11 synthetic peptides containing putative Aurora kinase recognition motifs as substrate. (C) Schematic localization of selected peptides on CENH3.

CENH3 Phosphorylation at Serine 65 Is Abundant in Reproductive Tissue

To analyze the presence and abundance of the CENH3 pS65 in planta, polyclonal antibodies were raised against the AtCENH3 peptide phosphorylated at serine 65 (hereafter CENH3 pS65). On Western blot performed, the strongest anti-CENH3 pS65 signal was detected in extracts of flower buds and the weakest in mature leaves (Figure 3). Western blotting with the same protein samples after phosphatase treatment showed only a weak immune signal, thereby demonstrating that the antibodies are specific to the phosphorylated form of AtCENH3, and retained only residual antigenicity to the non-phosphorylated form (Figure 3). A parallel Western blot using anti-CENH3 revealed a rather different distribution of signals (Supplementary Figure S4C). Here, strongest signals were found in proteins isolated from a rapidly growing cell suspension, and there was no quantitative difference in intensity between λ phosphatase-treated and non-treated samples. Although the quantity of CENH3 of the cell suspension extract was greater than that present of the flower bud extract (Supplementary Figure S4C), the quantity of phosphorylated CENH3 was greater in the flower buds (Figure 3), suggesting a possible physiological function of CENH3 phosphorylation during the development of reproductive tissue.


Figure 3. CENH3 is phosphorylated at serine 65 in tissues with a high frequency of cell divisions. Western blot analysis, based on an anti-CENH3 pS65 antibody, shows variation between samples isolated from different A. thaliana tissues. Upper panel, non-treated samples; central panel: samples treated with phosphatase; lower panel, loading control (anti-histone H3). Total CENH3 amount and Coomassie staining for the same samples are shown in Supplementary Figure S4C.

CENH3 Phosphorylation at Serine 65 Is Involved in Development of Vegetative and Especially Reproductive Tissues

To study in more detail the role of CENH3 pS65, we generated cDNA or genomic CENH3 constructs containing S65A, and S65D mutations. To visualize the sub-cellular localization of S65 phosphorylated CENH3, YFP fusion constructs containing CENH3 cDNA either with the S65A or the S65D mutation under the 35S promoter were transformed into wild-type A. thaliana plants. In vivo fluorescence analysis of plants expressing the CENH3 S65A or the S65D variant revealed a concentration of YFP signal at the centromeres, which was not distinguishable from the distribution seen in control plants – CENH3YFP (Supplementary Figures S5A–C). To understand the functional role of S65 phosphorylated CENH3, heterozygote cenh3-1 knock-out mutant plants were transformed with S65A, or S65D mutated CENH3 genomic constructs under the endogenous promoter. We assumed that the S65A mutation would prevent phosphorylation of CENH3 at this residue whereas the S65D mutation imitates the steric configuration and negative charge of phosphorylated S65 (Eot-Houllier et al., 2018). Both variants were able to rescue the lethality associated with homozygosity for the cenh3-1 mutation. A Western blot analysis based on an antibody recognizing CENH3 pS65 confirmed that neither of the two complemented lines experienced phosphorylation at position 65 (Supplementary Figures S6A–C). Phenotype analysis of the generated lines revealed no visible alteration in the growth of seedling roots (Supplementary Figure S11). A moderate difference in the vegetative growth rate at early growing stages (Supplementary Figures S7, S10) especially between 10 and 50 days after seeding (DAS), (compared to either the cenh3-1 mutants transformed with CENH3 S65S or with Wt) was observed for 92% of the S65D-complemented and 93% of the S65A-complemented plants (Figure 4A and Supplementary Table S3). About 8% of the S65D-complemented and 7% of the S65A-complemented plants showed a stronger reduction in the growth rate and impaired development of floral meristems and reproductive organs (Figure 4A and Supplementary Figure S8). The affected plants formed no anthers or petals, although their pistil appeared to be normal (Figure 4A and Supplementary Figures S9A,B). In general, cenh3-1 mutants complemented by S65A or S65D showed the same number (Supplementary Table S3) but a reduced biomass of leaves (Supplementary Figure S10) and were later flowering than Wt and S65S complemented lines (Supplementary Figure S7 and Supplementary Table S2). It should be noted that in older plants (∼63 DAS), cenh3-1 complemented mutants (S65A or S65D) showed an increased number of lateral stems compared to Wt, and S65S complemented lines (Supplementary Figure S7 and Supplementary Table S3). Around 30% of the S65D-complemented and 38% of the S65A-complemented plants were largely sterile and only their most distal siliques set a reduced number of seeds compared to Wt or cenh3-1 mutants transformed with CENH3 S65S (Figures 4A,B). Even the sum of developed and aborted seeds is lower in cenh3-1 complemented mutant plants (S65A or S65D) than in Wt and S65S complemented lines. In addition, the number of viable pollen grains in anthers of cenh3-1 complemented mutants (S65A or S65D) was reduced compared to Wt and S65S complemented plants (Figure 4C and Supplementary Figure S12). Further, the male meiosis (130 pollen mother cells) of S65 mutant plants did not show any obvious abnormality compared to Wt (n = 250), nor was there any evidence for aneuploids or polyploids among their progeny. Western blot analysis with anti-CENH3 antibodies of protein extracts from complemented and Wt plants showed despite clear growth differences (20 DAS), a similar abundance of CENH3 in all plants (Figures 5A,B). In silico expression analysis of Aurora3 and CENH3 in different tissues revealed the highest expression levels of both genes in floral and shoot apical meristems (Supplementary Figures S13A,B).


Figure 4. Replacement of serine 65 of CENH3 results in an abnormal plant growth and flower development. (A) Complementation of the cenh3-1 mutant with transgenes encoding either the CENH3 variants: Wt, S65D and S65A under native promotor, results in various phenotypical abnormalities especially involving reproductive structures (plants at 60 DAS). For each construct, 12 to 78 independent transgenic lines were obtained. (B) The CENH3 S65A and S65D transgenes do not rescue the cenh3-1 mutant with respect to seed set as fully as does transgenic Wt CENH3. The average number of seeds per silique was determined based on seven siliques per plant. The numbers shown in parentheses refer to the number of independent lines used for analysis. Error bars correspond to standard deviation. (C) The complementation of cenh3-1 by CENH3 S65A or S65D does not fully restore male fertility. The number of pollen per anther was determined based on fifteen anthers per plant. The average numbers shown in parentheses refer to the number of independent lines used for analysis. Error bars correspond to standard deviation. Columns indicated with asterisks were significantly different in comparison with Wt. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA-test (*p < 0.05). The calculations were performed with the statistical program SigmaPlot v12 (Systat Software, Inc.).


Figure 5. The phenotype of cenh3-1 mutants harboring CENH3 S65A or S65D does not correlate with the ratio of CENH3: H3. (A) The average ratio of CENH3 to H3 (based on a Western blot using LI-COR Image Studio 3.1 analytic software) in Wt and cenh3-1 plants harboring CENH3 S65A or S65D. The experiment was performed in seven biological replicates with protein extracted from 7 × 5 independent transgenic F2 plants and 7 × 5 Wt plants. Error bars correspond to standard deviation. (B) Shows typical phenotype of plants (20 DAS) analyzed in (A).


AtAurora3 Interacts With CENH3 in vivo and Phosphorylates It in vitro

We have shown that Aurora3, likely an A. thaliana ortholog of human Aurora B, interacts with AtCENH3 in vivo and phosphorylates it in vitro. In human cells, both Aurora A and B interact and phosphorylate CENH3 (Kunitoku et al., 2003; Slattery et al., 2008), but the interaction is stronger with Aurora B (Yu et al., 2015). In A. thaliana, Aurora3 is associated with the centromeres during mitosis (Demidov et al., 2005). Here IP revealed Arabidopsis Aurora kinase binding with AtCENH3 in extracts of growing seedlings after crosslinking with DSP, which retained in vivo protein-protein interactions in the presence of 1.5 M NaCl in the extraction buffer. A high salt concentration is needed to release CENH3 from nucleosomes. Additionally, BiFC demonstrated the interaction between Aurora3 and AtCENH3 in vivo, specifically at the centromeres after infiltration in tobacco leaves. This finding is in accordance with the observation that heterologous CENH3 may localize to the centromeres in addition to the endogenous variant of CENH3 (see review by Lermontova and Schubert, 2013). In vitro phosphorylation of CENH3 by Aurora kinase has been demonstrated in a range of organisms (Kunitoku et al., 2003; Slattery et al., 2008). Since the CENH3 N-terminal sequence is highly variable (even between closely related species), the determination of phosphorylation sites used by Aurora3 in A. thaliana was not feasible based on sequence homology. Nevertheless, the Aurora recognition motif, which was experimentally determined closely resembled that used by Aurora A and Aurora B (Dephoure et al., 2008; Gully et al., 2012). Nine of the 11 peptides carrying Aurora recognition sites were weakly phosphorylated, suggesting that multiple CENH3 phosphorylation sites are targeted in A. thaliana. These data were confirmed by the kinase assay using recombinant CENH3 as substrate. Additionally, phosphorylation of CENH3 by Aurora3 in vitro also demonstrates the interaction of both proteins. Substitution of serine 65 reduced but did not fully abolish CENH3 phosphorylation (Supplementary Figures S4A,B) indicating the existence of multiple putative AtAurora3 phosphorylation sites. The sequence context of CENH3 S65 was found in most, but not all Brassicaceae genomes (Maheshwari et al., 2015). However, at position threonine 65 occurs more often than serine (Supplementary Figure S14A). In some cases, even a non-phosphorylatable alanine residue is present, irrespective of whether the species encodes one or multiple CENH3 variants (Supplementary Figure S14B). Other conserved blocks within the N-terminal region of plant CENH3s also harbor Aurora recognition motifs, though at a lower frequency. Possibly, conserved sequence blocks could be favored recognition motifs for enzymes involved in post-translational CENH3 modifications. The CENH3 N-terminus can also be phosphorylated by other kinases, for example, by the cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Yu et al., 2015). The cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of maize CENH3 at S50 (Zhang et al., 2005) is likely not mediated by Aurora kinase because of the lack of a recognition motif for this enzyme in the vicinity of this site.

The use of a CENH3 pS65-specific antibody confirmed the identity of the phosphorylation sites identified in vitro and in vivo since binding was abolished after the protein sample had been phosphatase-treated. In agreement with Heckmann et al. (2011), who showed that the intensity of CENH3 expression is related to the extent of cell division occurring in a certain tissue, the present analysis indicated that the abundance of CENH3 was particularly high in actively dividing cells, e.g., in suspension cultures. However, phosphorylation of CENH3 at S65 was particularly high in protein extracts from flower buds. Phosphorylation of CENH3 S65 is not restricted to generative tissue since it also occurred in seedlings and in suspension cultures; and it does not strictly correlate with cell division, because its occurrence was relatively low in actively dividing suspension cultures. Assuming a tissue type-dependent regulation of CENH3 phosphorylation would be consistent with the tissue type-dependent organization and regulation of centromeres (Kagawa et al., 2014; Ishii et al., 2015).

Phosphorylation of CENH3 S65 by Aurora3 Is Required for Proper Development of Floral Meristems

In order to uncover the physiological role of S65 phosphorylation in vivo, cenh3-1 mutant plants were transformed with CENH3 gene variants displaying either S65A or S65D. Since the expression of Aurora3 and CENH3 depends on the cell cycle (Demidov et al., 2005; Heckmann et al., 2011; Lermontova et al., 2011a) and both are invovled in cell cycle control (Schumacher et al., 1998; Howman et al., 2000), we assume that the phosphorylation of serine 65 is cell cycle dependent in some meristematic tissues. This assumption is in line with the observation that in 30-days-old cenh3-1 mutants complemented by S65A or S65D the average size of epidermal cells, is smaller than that of Wt or of S65S complemented lines (Supplementary Figure S15A). In 50-days-old plants, this difference is abolished (Supplementary Figure S15B), and the size of leaf epidermal cells and plant age seem to be correlated (Kalve et al., 2014). Some of the S65A- and S65D-complemented cenh3-1 mutant plants displayed defective differentiation of the apical meristem and developed shoots without male reproductive structures (Figure 4A and Supplementary Figures S8, S9). We assume that in cenh3-1 complemented mutants (S65A or S65D), defects in the early floral meristem development lead to slower cell growth, and reduced biomass. This effect disappeared during later stages (Supplementary Figure S7 and Supplementary Table S2). After 63 DAS, plants remain smaller compared to the controls (Wt and S65S). CENH3 transgenics (S65A and S65D) showed an increased number of lateral stems (Supplementary Table S3). We speculate that, over time, the blocking of shoot meristem development in S65 mutants is released. Partial compensation of such blocking is visibly by an increase in the number of lateral stems. However, they are smaller than in control plants because they already lost the time for normal growth during the life cycle. Therefore, CENH3 transformants (S65A and S65D) generally remain slightly smaller in size compared to controls (WT and S65S).

Because Aurora3 and CENH3 are strongly expressed in the floral meristem, phosphorylation mutations of CENH3 might contribute to the observed morphological changes of male generative organs. Most likely, the dynamic CENH3 phosphorylation of serine 65 is involved in the regulation of floral meristem development, as implied by the high abundance of pS65 in flower buds (Figure 3), and by the phenotypic effect of S65 substitutions which resembled those seen in plants expressing CENH3 variants with a modified N-terminus (Ravi et al., 2011) or just the CENH3 histone fold domain (Lermontova et al., 2011b).

Interestingly, overexpression of AtAurora1 in tobacco similarly results in an altered stamen morphology, in a reduced growth rate and in enlarged axillary meristems (Demidov et al., 2014). Down-regulation of Arabidopsis Aurora1 and Aurora3 results in reduced biomass, slow development, reduced pollen fertility and seed setting (Demidov et al., 2014). This phenotype is reminiscent, but not completely identical to, that of the S65A- and S65D-complemented cenh3-1 mutants.

Two reasons why no phenotypic differences between the S65A- and the S65D-complemented cenh3-1 mutants were found can be envisaged. Either the S65D complementation does not functionally compensate for S65 phosphorylation, in spite of its steric similarity to pS65. Alternatively, S65 undergoes highly dynamic phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, and both substitutions (S65A and S65D) impair the functionality of CENH3 and therefore result in the observed phenotype. Comparable results were observed for tissue-cultured human CENH3 mutants (Zeitlin et al., 2001). Substitution of CENH3 Ser7 by Ala or Glu (Glu like Asp imitates pSer) equally leads to an increase of the Flemming body lifetime and midbody length in comparison with the control. The authors explained this observation by a possible change in the CENH3 N-termini structure or due to the disruption of the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation dynamics of Ala7 and Glu7 mutated CENH3.

For a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in CENH3 S65 phosphorylation and its physiological significance in the development of meristems, additional experiments will be needed. For example, it would be of interest to analyze the expression of the key meristem development regulators in S65A- and S65D-complemented cenh3-1 mutants.

The overall conclusion is that Aurora3 phosphorylates CENH3 at S65 and that this post-translational modification is required for the proper development of the floral meristem.

Data Availability

All datasets generated for this study are included in the manuscript and/or the Supplementary Files.

Author Contributions

DD, SH, TR, MK, and AH designed the study. DD, IL, SH, OW, TR, EDT, MK, PS, and CM conducted the experiments. DD, TR, MK, and AH analyzed the data. DD, IL, and AH drafted the manuscript.


This research was made possible by grants from the German Research Foundation (SFB) 648 “Molecular mechanisms of information processing in plants” and by the BMBF 031B0192A “HaploTools.” EDT was supported by the Nationl Programme of Sustainability I (LO1204) and The European Regional Development Fund project “Plants as a tool for sustainable global development” (no. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000827 to E.D.T.).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We thank Karla Meier (IPK, Gatersleben) for technical assistance, Karin Lipfert for help with figure artwork, Ingo Schubert for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions, Kijo Nagaki (Okayama University, Japan) for providing CENPC-specific antibodies, Klaus Harter (Department of Plant Physiology, University of Tuebingen, Germany) for BIFC constructs, and the late Simon Chan (UC Davis, United States) for the cloned A. thaliana CENH3 genomic fragment and for seeds of the A. thaliana cenh3-1 heterozygote.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:


  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^
  6. ^
  7. ^
  8. ^
  9. ^
  10. ^
  11. ^
  12. ^
  13. ^
  14. ^


Adams, R. R., Carmena, M., and Earnshaw, W. C. (2001). Chromosomal passengers and the (aurora) ABCs of mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 11, 49–54. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01880-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alexander, M. P. (1969). Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 44, 117–122. doi: 10.3109/10520296909063335

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bailey, A. O., Panchenko, T., Sathyan, K. M., Petkowski, J. J., Pai, P. J., Bai, D. L., et al. (2013). Posttranslational modification of CENP-A influences the conformation of centromeric chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 11827–11832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300325110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boeckmann, L., Takahashi, Y., Au, W. C., Mishra, P. K., Choy, J. S., Dawson, A. R., et al. (2013). Phosphorylation of centromeric histone H3 variant regulates chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 2034–2044. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-12-0893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clough, S. J., and Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Demidov, D., Hesse, S., Tewes, A., Rutten, T., Fuchs, J., Ashtiyani, R. K., et al. (2009). Aurora1 phosphorylation activity on histone H3 and its cross-talk with other post-translational histone modifications in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 59, 221–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03861.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Demidov, D., Lermontova, I., Weiss, O., Fuchs, J., Rutten, T., Kumke, K., et al. (2014). Altered expression of Aurora kinases in Arabidopsis results in aneu- and polyploidization. Plant J. 80, 449–461. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Demidov, D., Van Damme, D., Geelen, D., Blattner, F. R., and Houben, A. (2005). Identification and dynamics of two classes of Aurora-like kinases in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant Cell 17, 836–848. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.029710

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dephoure, N., Zhou, C., Villen, J., Beausoleil, S. A., Bakalarski, C. E., Elledge, S. J., et al. (2008). A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 10762–10767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805139105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Earnshaw, W. C., Allshire, R. C., Black, B. E., Bloom, K., Brinkley, B. R., Brown, W., et al. (2013). Esperanto for histones: CENP-A, not CenH3, is the centromeric histone H3 variant. Chromosome Res. 21, 101–106. doi: 10.1007/s10577-013-9347-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Earnshaw, W. C., and Rothfield, N. (1985). Identification of a family of human centromere proteins using autoimmune sera from patients with scleroderma. Chromosoma 91, 313–321. doi: 10.1007/bf00328227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Edwards, K., Johnstone, C., and Thompson, C. (1991). A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 1349–1349. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.6.1349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eot-Houllier, G., Magnaghi-Jaulin, L., Fulcrand, G., Moyroud, F. X., Monier, S., and Jaulin, C. (2018). Aurora A-dependent CENP-A phosphorylation at inner centromeres protects bioriented chromosomes against cohesion fatigue. Nat. Commun. 9:1888.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Goutte-Gattat, D., Shuaib, M., Ouararhni, K., Gautier, T., Skoufias, D. A., Hamiche, A., et al. (2013). Phosphorylation of the CENP-A amino-terminus in mitotic centromeric chromatin is required for kinetochore function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 8579–8584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302955110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gully, C. P., Velazquez-Torres, G., Shin, J. H., Fuentes-Mattei, E., Wang, E., Carlock, C., et al. (2012). Aurora B kinase phosphorylates and instigates degradation of p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, E1513–E1522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110287109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heckmann, S., Lermontova, I., Berckmans, B., De Veylder, L., Baumlein, H., and Schubert, I. (2011). The E2F transcription factor family regulates CENH3 expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 68, 646–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04715.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hergeth, S. P., Dundr, M., Tropberger, P., Zee, B. M., Garcia, B. A., Daujat, S., et al. (2011). Isoform-specific phosphorylation of human linker histone H1.4 in mitosis by the kinase Aurora B. J. Cell Sci. 124(Pt 10), 1623–1628. doi: 10.1242/jcs.084947

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffmann, G., Samel-Pommerencke, A., Weber, J., Cuomo, A., Bonaldi, T., and Ehrenhofer-Murray, A. E. (2018). A role for CENP-A/Cse4 phosphorylation on serine 33 in deposition at the centromere. Fems Yeast Res. 18:fox094. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Howman, E. V., Fowler, K. J., Newson, A. J., Redward, S., MacDonald, A. C., Kalitsis, P., et al. (2000). Early disruption of centromeric chromatin organization in centromere protein A (Cenpa) null mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A. 97, 1148–1153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, J. Y., Sun, Z. W., Li, X., Reuben, M., Tatchell, K., Bishop, D. K., et al. (2000). Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 is governed by Ipl1/aurora kinase and Glc7/PP1 phosphatase in budding yeast and nematodes. Cell 102, 279–291. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00034-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishii, T., Karimi-Ashtiyani, R., Banaei-Moghaddam, A. M., Schubert, V., Fuchs, J., and Houben, A. (2015). The differential loading of two barley CENH3 variants into distinct centromeric substructures is cell type- and development-specific. Chromosome Res. 23, 277–284. doi: 10.1007/s10577-015-9466-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kagawa, N., Hori, T., Hoki, Y., Hosoya, O., Tsutsui, K., Saga, Y., et al. (2014). The CENP-O complex requirement varies among different cell types. Chromosome Res. 22, 293–303. doi: 10.1007/s10577-014-9404-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalve, S., Fotschki, J., Beeckman, T., Vissenberg, K., and Beemster, G. T. S. (2014). Three-dimensional patterns of cell division and expansion throughout the development of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 6385–6397. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru358

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karimi-Ashtiyani, R., and Houben, A. (2013). In vitro phosphorylation of histone h3 at threonine 3 by Arabidopsis haspin is strongly influenced by posttranslational modifications of adjacent amino acids. Mol. Plant 6, 574–576. doi: 10.1093/mp/sss149

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kato, S., Imoto, Y., Ohnuma, M., Matsunaga, T. M., Kuroiwa, H., Kawano, S., et al. (2011). Aurora kinase of the red alga cyanidioschyzon merolae is related to both mitochondrial division and mitotic spindle formation. Cytologia 76, 455–462. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.76.455

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kawabe, A., Matsunaga, S., Nakagawa, K., Kurihara, D., Yoneda, A., Hasezawa, S., et al. (2005). Characterization of plant Aurora kinases during mitosis. Plant Mol. Biol. 58, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-3454-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keçeli, B. N., De Storme, N., and Geelen, D. (2017). In Vivo ploidy determination of Arabidopsis thaliana male and female gametophytes. Methods Mol. Biol. 1669, 77–85. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7286-9_7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kunitoku, N., Sasayama, T., Marumoto, T., Zhang, D., Honda, S., Kobayashi, O., et al. (2003). CENP-A phosphorylation by Aurora-A in prophase is required for enrichment of Aurora-B at inner centromeres and for kinetochore function. Dev. Cell 5, 853–864. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00364-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurihara, D., Matsunaga, S., Kawabe, A., Fujimoto, S., Noda, M., Uchiyama, S., et al. (2006). Aurora kinase is required for chromosome segregation in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant J. 48, 572–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02893.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lermontova, I., Koroleva, O., Rutten, T., Fuchs, J., Schubert, V., Moraes, I., et al. (2011a). Knockdown of CENH3 in Arabidopsis reduces mitotic divisions and causes sterility by disturbed meiotic chromosome segregation. Plant J. 68, 40–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04664.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lermontova, I., Kuhlmann, M., Friedel, S., Rutten, T., Heckmann, S., Sandmann, M., et al. (2013). Arabidopsis KINETOCHORE NULL2 is an upstream component for centromeric histone H3 variant cenH3 deposition at centromeres. Plant Cell 25, 3389–3404. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.114736

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lermontova, I., Rutten, T., and Schubert, I. (2011b). Deposition, turnover, and release of CENH3 at Arabidopsis centromeres. Chromosoma 120, 633–640. doi: 10.1007/s00412-011-0338-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lermontova, I., and Schubert, I. (2013). “CENH3 for Establishing and Maintaining Centromeres,,” in Plant Centromere Biology. eds J. Jiming and J. A. Birchler (Hoboken,: Wiley-Blackwell), 67–82. doi: 10.1002/9781118525715.ch6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lermontova, I., Schubert, V., Fuchs, J., Klatte, S., Macas, J., and Schubert, I. (2006). Loading of Arabidopsis centromeric histone CENH3 occurs mainly during G2 and requires the presence of the histone fold domain. Plant Cell 18, 2443–2451. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.043174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maheshwari, S., Tan, E. H., West, A., Franklin, F. C., Comai, L., and Chan, S. W. (2015). Naturally occurring differences in CENH3 affect chromosome segregation in zygotic mitosis of hybrids. PLoS Genet. 11:e1004970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004970

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manzanero, S., Arana, P., Puertas, M. J., and Houben, A. (2000). The chromosomal distribution of phosphorylated histone H3 differs between plants and animals at meiosis. Chromosoma 109, 308–317. doi: 10.1007/s004120000087

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, P. K., Olafsson, G., Boeckmann, L., Westlake, T. J., Jowhar, Z. M., Dittman, L. E., et al. (2019). Cell cycle-dependent association of polo kinase Cdc5 with CENP-A contributes to faithful chromosome segregation in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 1020–1036. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e18-09-0584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nagaki, K., Kashihara, K., and Murata, M. (2009). Characterization of the two centromeric proteins CENP-C and MIS12 in Nicotiana species. Chromosome Res. 17, 719–726. doi: 10.1007/s10577-009-9064-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravi, M., and Chan, S. W. (2010). Haploid plants produced by centromere-mediated genome elimination. Nature 464, 615–618. doi: 10.1038/nature08842

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravi, M., Shibata, F., Ramahi, J. S., Nagaki, K., Chen, C., Murata, M., et al. (2011). Meiosis-specific loading of the centromere-specific histone CENH3 in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Samel, A., Cuomo, A., Bonaldi, T., and Ehrenhofer-Murray, A. E. (2012). Methylation of CenH3 arginine 37 regulates kinetochore integrity and chromosome segregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 9029–9034. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120968109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sánchez-Morán, E., Benavente, E., and Orellana, J. (2001). Analysis of karyotypic stability of homoeologous-pairing (ph) mutants in allopolyploid wheats. Chromosoma 110, 371–377. doi: 10.1007/s004120100156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schagger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1987). Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166, 368–379. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90587-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schumacher, J. M., Golden, A., and Donovan, P. J. (1998). AIR-2: an Aurora/Ipl1-related protein kinase associated with chromosomes and midbody microtubules is required for polar body extrusion and cytokinesis in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1635–1646. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.6.1635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Slattery, S. D., Moore, R. V., Brinkley, B. R., and Hall, R. M. (2008). Aurora-C and Aurora-B share phosphorylation and regulation of CENP-A and Borealin during mitosis. Cell Cycle 7, 787–795. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.6.5563

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spiker, S. (1980). A modification of the acetic acid-urea system for use in microslab polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 108, 263–265. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90579-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swain, J. E., Ding, J., Wu, J., and Smith, G. D. (2008). Regulation of spindle and chromatin dynamics during early and late stages of oocyte maturation by Aurora kinases. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 14, 291–299. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gan015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takada, M., Zhang, W., Suzuki, A., Kuroda, T. S., Yu, Z., Inuzuka, H., et al. (2017). FBW7 Loss promotes chromosomal instability and tumorigenesis via cyclin E1/CDK2-mediated phosphorylation of CENP-A. Cancer Res. 77, 4881–4893. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Talbert, P. B., Masuelli, R., Tyagi, A. P., Comai, L., and Henikoff, S. (2002). Centromeric localization and adaptive evolution of an Arabidopsis histone H3 variant. Plant Cell 14, 1053–1066. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010425

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tikhenko, N., Rutten, T., Tsvetkova, N., Voylokov, A., and Borner, A. (2015). Hybrid dwarfness in crosses between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rye (Secale cereale L.): a new look at an old phenomenon. Plant Biol. 17, 320–326. doi: 10.1111/plb.12237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomaštíková, E., Demidov, D., Jeřábková, H., Binarová, P., Houben, A., Doležel, J., et al. (2015). TPX2 Protein of Arabidopsis activates aurora kinase 1, but not aurora kinase 3 in vitro. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 33, 1988–1995. doi: 10.1007/s11105-015-0890-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walter, M., Chaban, C., Schutze, K., Batistic, O., Weckermann, K., Nake, C., et al. (2004). Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Plant J. 40, 428–438.

Google Scholar

Wang, K., Yu, Z., Liu, Y., and Li, G. (2017). Ser68 phosphorylation ensures accurate cell-cycle-dependent CENP-A deposition at centromeres. Dev. Cell 40, 5–6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.12.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Z., Zhou, X., Wang, W., Deng, W., Fang, J., Hu, H., et al. (2015). Dynamic phosphorylation of CENP-A at Ser68 orchestrates its cell-cycle-dependent deposition at centromeres. Dev. Cell 32, 68–81. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zeitlin, S. G., Shelby, R. D., and Sullivan, K. F. (2001). CENP-A is phosphorylated by Aurora B kinase and plays an unexpected role in completion of cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1147–1157.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Li, X., Marshall, J. B., Zhong, C. X., and Dawe, R. K. (2005). Phosphoserines on maize CENTROMERIC HISTONE H3 and histone H3 demarcate the centromere and pericentromere during chromosome segregation. Plant Cell 17, 572–583. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.028522

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: CENH3, phosphorylation, Aurora kinase, floral meristem, Arabidopsis

Citation: Demidov D, Heckmann S, Weiss O, Rutten T, Dvořák Tomaštíková E, Kuhlmann M, Scholl P, Municio CM, Lermontova I and Houben A (2019) Deregulated Phosphorylation of CENH3 at Ser65 Affects the Development of Floral Meristems in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 10:928. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00928

Received: 02 May 2019; Accepted: 02 July 2019;
Published: 25 July 2019.

Edited by:

Juan Armando Casas-Mollano, University of Minnesota, United States

Reviewed by:

Sachihiro Matsunaga, Tokyo University of Science, Japan
Kai Wang, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China

Copyright © 2019 Demidov, Heckmann, Weiss, Rutten, Dvořák Tomaštíková, Kuhlmann, Scholl, Municio, Lermontova and Houben. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dmitri Demidov,

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.