Abstract
Owing to their sessile life habit, plants are continuously subjected to a broad range of environmental stresses. During periods of (a)biotic stresses, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels can rise excessively, leading to oxidative stress. Glutathione reductase (GR) plays an important role in scavenging the ROS and maintenance of redox potential of the cell during oxidative stress. To enhance ROS scavenging capacity, and hence stress tolerance, the Arabidopsis thalianaGR2 (AtGR2) gene was expressed from the tobacco plastid (chloroplast) genome, the main source of ROS production in plant photosynthetic tissues, in this study. Leaves of transplastomic tobacco plants had about seven times GR activity and 1.5 times total glutathione levels compared to wild type. These transplastomic tobacco plants showed no discernible phenotype and exhibited more tolerance to methyl viologen-induced oxidative stress than wild-type control plants. The results indicate that introducing AtGR2 in chloroplasts is an efficient approach to increase stress tolerance. This study also provides evidence that increasing antioxidant enzyme via plastid genome engineering is an alternative to enhance plant’s tolerance to stressful conditions.
Introduction
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced as an unavoidable consequence of electron transport processes in photosynthesis and aerobic metabolism. The most common ROS in plants are singlet oxygen (1O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2-), and hydroxyl radical (OH·) (). ROS levels rise excessively under stressful conditions, which potentially leads to oxidative stress and damage to macromolecules, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids (). Plants have therefore developed a combination of nonenzymatic and enzymatic antioxidative mechanisms to control ROS concentrations (). The ascorbate-glutathione pathway was recognized to be a key player in H2O2 metabolism in plants, which has been shown to be present in the cytosol, mitochondria, and peroxisomes, as well as the chloroplasts (; ). In this pathway, the reduced glutathione (GSH) is continuously oxidized to glutathione disulphide (GSSG) that is recycled to GSH via NADPH-dependent glutathione reductase (GR) (). GSH has often been considered to play an important role in defense of plants, in which it functions as a powerful reductant that maintains protein thiols in their reduced state (; ). GR is localized mainly in the chloroplast in leaf tissues, which is also found in the cytosol, mitochondria, and peroxisomes (). For example, in tobacco and pea plants, about 70% of total GR activity originates from chloroplasts (; ). In Arabidopsis, chloroplastic and mitochondrial GR is encoded by AtGR2, and AtGR1 encodes a protein that is localized to both the cytosol and peroxisome (; ; ).
A plethora of studies have demonstrated that GR plays an essential role in scavenging the ROS and maintenance of redox potential of the plant cell during oxidative stress (; ). It has been observed that GR activity was induced in plants under abiotic and biotic stresses (; ; ; ). Overexpression of GR in plants could effectively increase tolerance to various stresses. Transgenic cotton overexpressing a mutated chloroplastic AtGR2 resulted in a 36-fold increase in GR activity, coupled with increased tolerance to short-term chilling stress (; ). A recent report has shown that expressing a GR from Stipa purpurea in Arabidopsis resulted in greater tolerance to salt stress than that of wild-type (WT) plants ().
The chloroplast is a major source of ROS because relatively a high concentration of oxygen is able to react with electrons that escape from the photosynthetic electron transfer system (). Thus, overexpression of antioxidant enzymes in the chloroplast may be a straightforward strategy to increase the tolerance of transgenic plants to various environmental stresses. Tobacco plants expressing the GR gene from Escherichia coli, targeted to either cytosol or chloroplasts, showed enhanced tolerance to methyl viologen (MV) (, ). Similarly, doubled total glutathione levels, significant increase in GSH/GSSG ratio, and resistance to MV were observed in the chloroplast-targeted bacterial GR–transgenic poplar hybrids ().
In addition to transform genes encoding ROS scavenging enzymes targeted chloroplasts via nuclear transformation, expressing these genes directly in the chloroplast via plastid transformation is a promising alternative to protect plants against various oxidative stresses (; ). Compared with conventional transgenic technologies, plastid transformation offers several highly attractive features, such as site-specific transgene integration, high protein expression levels, the absence of epigenetic and position effects, stacking of transgenes into operons, and the excellent biosafety resulting from maternal inheritance, which greatly prevents the probability of unwanted transgene spread via pollen (; ; ). Thus, plastid engineering has been extensively applied in biopharmaceuticals and industrial enzyme production and in crop improvement against a variety of environmental insults (; ; ; ).
The MV exerts its phytotoxic effects on plants by transferring electrons from photosystem I to O2, which leads to the generation of O2- in chloroplasts (). In this study, we transformed AtGR2 gene to tobacco chloroplasts genome, resulting in an increase in GR activity and total glutathione pools, as well as enhanced resistance to MV stress.
Materials and Methods
Construction of Transformation Vectors
Total RNA was isolated from 100 mg of Columbia-0 ecotype of Arabidopsis thaliana fresh tissue using the Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using GoScript™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega, USA) from 3 μg of total RNA. The protocols were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The coding region of the AtGR2 gene (Locus: AT3G54660), omitting a 222-bp sequence encoding chloroplast transit peptide (), was amplified by using a primer pair AtGR2-Fwd-1 (TTTAAGAAGGAGATATACCCATGAGTACC GATAATGGAGCTGAATC)/AtGR2-Rev-1 (AGCCTTTCGTTTTATTTGATTCTAG ATTCTACACCCCAGCAGCTGTTTTAG). The primers harbor (underlined) a short homologous sequence to a plastid expression vector pYY12 (). The pYY12 was digested using NcoI and XbaI (Takara, Japan) and then cotransformed with AtGR2 PCR product into E. coli (XL10-Gold, Agilent technologies) competent cells to generate plastid transformation construct pLSC5 () (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Tobacco seedlings (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Petit Havana) were raised on agar-solidified MS medium containing 30 g/L sucrose (). Regenerated homoplasmic shoots from transplastomic N. tabacum lines were rooted and propagated on the same medium. Rooted plants were transferred to soil and cultivated in a controlled environment growth room (light intensity: 150 μmol m−2 s−1; day temperature: 25◦C; night temperature: 20 ◦C; diurnal cycle: 16-h light/8-h darkness; relative humidity: 55%).
Plastid Transformation and Selection of Transplastomic Lines
DNA for plastid transformation was prepared using the Nucleobond Xtra Plasmid Midi Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). Young leaves from aseptically grown tobacco plants were bombarded with plastid-coated 0.6-µm gold particles (BioRad) using a helium-driven biolistic gun (PDS-1000 He; Bio-Rad) with the Hepta Adaptor setup and 1,100 psi rupture disks (BioRad). The bombarded leaf samples were cut into small (∼5 × 5 mm) pieces and were placed with abaxial side up on RMOP medium containing 500 mg/L spectinomycin in a Petri dish for selection (). In general, spectinomycin-resistant shoots appeared within 1 month. The initial shoots were further screened on RMOP medium supplemented with spectinomycin (500 mg/L) and streptomycin (500 mg/L) to eliminate spontaneous spectinomycin-resistant mutants. Several independent transplastomic lines were obtained and subjected to one or two additional rounds of regeneration on RMOP/spectinomycin medium to select for homoplasmy. Homoplasmic shoots were transferred onto rooting medium, which consists of MS salts, 30 g/L sucrose, and 0.1 mg/L NAA. Rooted shoots were transferred to the greenhouse for seed production.
DNA Extraction and Southern Blot Analysis
Total DNA was isolated from leaves of WT and spectinomycin-resistant plants using a cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)-based extraction method (). DNA samples (5 µg total cellular DNA) were digested with Bgl II for 16 h, separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels and transferred onto a positively charged nylon membranes (GE Healthcare, USA) by capillary action using the semi-dry transfer method. A 550-bp fragment of the psaB gene was amplified by PCR from tobacco plastid DNA using primer pair psaB-Fwd (CCCAGAAAGAGGCTGGCCC)/psaB-Rev (CCCAAGGGGCGGGAACTGC) and used as hybridization probe to verify plastid transformants. Labeling of the probe and hybridization were performed with the DIG-High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit II following the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche, USA).
RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA was isolated from fresh leaves of WT and transplastomic plants using Trizol Up (TransGen Biotech, China) and following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples (3 µg total RNA) were denatured and separated by electrophoresis in formaldehyde-containing 1% agarose gels. The separated RNA molecules were then transferred from the gel to a positively charged nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, USA). The AtGR2 specific probe, a 566-bp fragment, was amplified by PCR from cDNA of Arabidopsis with primer pair AtGR2-Fwd-2 (CCTGGTTGGAGCCCTCATAGT)/AtGR2-Rev-2 (GCAAGCCCAACACAAAGAACT). The probe was labeled with DIG using the PCR DIG probe synthesis kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (Roche, USA). RNA blots were hybridized at 42◦C.
Methyl Viologen Treatment
Leaf discs (10 mm in diameter) were cut out from leaves of nodes 3 and 4 of soil-grown plants and floated, with abaxial surface down, on 10 ml of water or solutions containing different concentrations of MV (0.5, 1, 2, and 5 μM) in 24-well plate. Plates were incubated in the dark for 12 h to allow diffusion of the MV into the leaf disc and then placed under light (intensity 100 μmol m−2 s−1) for 24 h.
Ion Leakage Measurement
The ion leakage into the solutions used for floating the leaf discs in the MV experiment was determined using the Leici DDS-11A conductivity meter (Shanghai, China). The conductivity was measured first after each experiment (value A), then the bathing solutions containing the leaf discs were autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min, and the conductivity was measured again to get the total ion leakage (value B). The relative ion leakage was then calculated as a percentage: (value A⁄value B) × 100.
Estimation of Chlorophyll Content
The concentrations of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were calculated based on the formula of .
Antioxidant Enzyme Assays, Metabolites, and ROS Analysis
Extractable enzyme activities were measured as described previously (). Oxidized and reduced forms of glutathione were measured by plate-reader assay as described by . H2O2 content was determined by the method of titanium oxidation with hydroperoxide-titanium complex formed ().
Results
Generation of Transplastomic Tobacco Lines
The plastid transformation vector pLSC5 (Figure 1A) was constructed, and AtGR2 was introduced into tobacco plastids via particle bombardment, and transplastomic shoots were regenerated on a synthetic regeneration medium containing spectinomycin. A number of transplastomic lines were obtained and subjected to one or two additional regeneration rounds on spectinomycin-containing RMOP medium. Two independently transformed lines (Nt-pLSC5#3 and Nt-pLSC5#8) were further characterized. Southern blot analysis verified the homoplasmic state of the Nt-pLSC5 lines, as evidenced by absence of a hybridization signal for the 3.5-kb fragment diagnostic of the WT and exclusive presence of the 7.1-kb fragment expected in transplastomic plants (Figure 1B). The homoplasmic state of the transplastomic lines was further verified by seed assays (Figure 1C).
The phenotypes of homoplasmic transplastomic lines were analyzed under both mixotrophic growth conditions on synthetic sucrose-containing medium (Figure S1A) and autotrophic growth conditions in soil (Figure S1B). Transplastomic Nt-pLSC5 plants were indistinguishable from WT plants in both conditions. Measurement of chlorophyll from autotrophic grown plants additionally confirmed the indistinguishable phenotype between Nt-pLSC5 and WT plants (Figure S1C).
Glutathione Reductase and Glutathione Analysis
To examine the AtGR2 transcript accumulation in leaves of Nt-pLSC5 plants, Northern blotting was performed using a hybridization probe specific for the AtGR2 coding region. Hybridization to the AtGR2 specific probe detected two transcripts (Figure 2A), with the smallest of ∼1.5 kb representing the expected AtGR2 mRNA. The larger bands most probably represent read-through transcripts, which are common in plastids and usually originate from inefficient transcription termination (; ).
Figure 2
In leaves of the Nt-pLSC5 plants, the GR activity increased six-fold compared to WT (Figure 2B). To further assess the impact of enhanced GR activity on the ROS–antioxidant interaction, we measured the extractable activities of ascorbate peroxidase (APX), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), catalase (CAT), and superoxidase dismutase (SOD), the enzymes linking H2O2 metabolism and glutathione pools (). CAT activity was significantly increased in Nt-pLSC5 plants compared to WT (Figure S2A), while APX, DHAR, and SOD activities were not greatly affected (Figures S2B, C, D).
The level of total glutathione was elevated by ∼50% in Nt-pLSC5 plants when compared to WT. This increase was mostly due to an increase in the levels of GSH (Figure 2C).
Effect of Methyl Viologen Stress
To evaluate tolerance to MV-mediated oxidative stress, transplastomic, and WT leaf discs were floated on MV solution with concentrations. Severe necrosis was observed in WT leaf discs treated with MV from 0.5 μM upward, while partial necrosis was observed and increased in a dose-dependent manner at the edges of transplastomic leaf discs up to 2 μM MV. All leaf discs were strongly damaged at 5 μM MV (Figure 3A). The membrane damage in MV-treated, WT, and transplastomic leaf discs was measured by ion leakage. A protective effect was detected in the transplastomic leaf discs exposed to 0.5 μM MV, which showed a significantly lower percentage of ion leakage compared to WT, and no significant difference in the percent of leakage was seen between WT and transplastomic leaf discs treated with 5 μM MV (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
To determine whether overexpressing GR had any influence on H2O2 accumulation during MV stress exposure, the amount of H2O2 was also measured in control and transplastomic leaf discs in the presence or absence of stress. The H2O2 accumulated markedly in WT following 8 h illumination of leaf discs incubated with 2 μM MV, while H2O2 content remained relatively lower in transplastomic leaf discs (Figure 4), suggesting that enhanced GR activity in transplastomic plants contributes to control excessive H2O2 levels.
Figure 4
Discussion
As a component of ascorbate-glutathione pathway, GR plays an essential role in ROS detoxification, GSH regeneration, and stress tolerance in plants (). Overexpressing the GR gene led to an increase in antioxidant capacity and, hence, stress tolerance. The chloroplast is regarded as an important source of ROS production due to numerous electron transfer reactions in the presence of oxygen, which would be further accelerated by stresses (; ). Overexpression of E. coli GR in chloroplasts was more effective than that in cytosol under abiotic stresses. For example, overexpression of bacterial GR in the chloroplast of poplar resulted in 1,000 times higher GR activity; however, cytosolic GR-transformed poplar had only 10 times higher GR activity compared to control plants. Moreover, only chloroplastic GR-transformed plants exhibited an increase in GSH/GSSG ratio and glutathione levels and more tolerance to photoinhibition as well (). Likewise, Indian mustard overexpressing bacterial GR gene in the chloroplast, but not in the cytosol, accumulated twice higher glutathione levels in roots and showed enhanced cadmium tolerance (). The higher effectiveness of chloroplast-targeted than cytosol-targeted bacterial GR overexpression in plants was attributed to higher stability of the E. coli protein in the chloroplast than in the cytosol ().
In this study, we report the stable integration and expression of AtGR2 gene from the tobacco plastid genome. The transplastomic Nt-pLSC5 plants had an increase in both GR activity and GSH level (Figures 2B, C), resulting in more tolerance to MV treatment compared to WT (Figure 3). Increased activity of CAT could make a contribution to MV tolerance through H2O2 degradation (Figure S2B). However, these results conflicted with a previous report that more oxidative stress sensitivity to MV treatment was found in E. coli GR–transplastomic tobacco plants than untransgenic control (). Although the AtGR2 and bacterial GR–transplastomic lines had similar GR activity increase, total glutathione pools were much higher (eight-fold increase) in the latter ones (). In fact, eight-fold total glutathione levels increase was the most powerful induction in GR-transformed plants in available literatures (). The more MV sensitivity of bacterial GR–transplastomic was explained on the basis of impaired redox sensing in the chloroplast, which was similar to the finding of who increased three-fold GSH level by transformation with γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS) targeted to chloroplasts (). These results suggest that there may be a threshold value of glutathione concentration in chloroplasts in plants beyond which would lead to oxidative stress on the contrary. Intriguingly, overexpressing bacterial GR in the chloroplast of poplar led to about twice increase in GSH level, despite that extractable GR activity was up to 1,000-fold higher than those of control poplars (), which suggests that GSH correlates weakly with GR activity. After all, glutathione pools are also affected by γ-ECS activity and cysteine availability ().
Moreover, plant-encoded GR affords greater protection than the E. coli-derived enzyme may partially explain the contrasting observation between AtGR2- and bacterial GR–transplastomic tobacco plants (). Overexpression of a pea GR gene in the tobacco chloroplast, cytosol, or in both chloroplasts and mitochondrion simultaneously resulted in elevated GR activity and a 50% increase in total glutathione pools, which tolerated much higher MV concentration than the bacterial GR-transgenic tobacco plants (, ), suggesting that plant-encoded GR might afford greater protection than the E. coli-derived enzyme. This may be due to the fact that GRs from plant sources is less sensitive to inhibition by NADPH than E. coli-derived GR (; ; ).
Besides tolerance to MV, which induces excessive ROS generation in chloroplasts, transplatomic Nt-pLSC5 plants also showed enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress (Figure S3). Elevated GR was reported to improve heavy metal stress due to the observed upgraded GSH levels, which is the precursor for the metal binding peptides, phytochelatins (; ). However, transplatomic Nt-pLSC5 plants did not exhibit tolerance to cadmium and lead compared to WT plants probably due to insufficient induction of the glutathione pool (Figure S4).
Apart from different sources of GR selection and its expression in different cellular compartments, recognizing characteristics of GR isoforms, including their monomeric, homodimeric, and heterodimeric structures, is also crucial for GR gene manipulation in plants under stress conditions (; ). Moreover, increasing evidences indicated that transgenic plants with multiple genes for antioxidant pathway showed better tolerance to environmental stresses compared to that containing a single gene product. For example, simultaneous overexpression of GR and SOD in tobacco exhibited much more tolerance to MV than that transformed single GR (). Coexpression of GR and DHAR or glutathione-S-transferase from tobacco plastid genome resulted in the increased tolerance of the transgenic plants to a variety of abiotic stresses, such as MV-induced oxidative stress, salt, cold, and heavy metal stresses, whereas expression of sole GR exhibited sensitivity to MV (). As multiple genes can be engineered as an operon in plastid genome, therefore, next effort would be combined. In conclusion, our study clearly indicates that directly expressing ROS-scavenging enzyme in plastid is an attractive approach to increase plant’s tolerance to stress conditions.
Statements
Author contributions
SL and JZ conceived and designed the research. BW, HD, QC, and LO conducted the experiments. SL and JZ analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700227 to SL, 31572071 to JZ).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01178/full#supplementary-material
Figure S1Phenotypes of WT and transplastomic plants. Plants are shown after (A) 6 weeks of growth under heterotrophic conditions in sterile culture on sucrose-containing synthetic medium, (B) 6 weeks of growth under photoautotrophic conditions in soil. Bars indicate 2 cm. (C) Chlorophyll a/b contents of leaves from (C) cultivated condition. Data are means ± SE of four independent extracts.
Figure S2Activities of antioxidative enzymes related to H2O2 metabolism and glutathione pools in WT and transgenic plants. (A) APX. (B) CAT. (C) DHAR. (D) SOD. The experiments were repeated four times and data are means ± SE of four independent measurements. Asterisks indicate significant differences from WT values in the same condition (P < 0.05).
Figure S3Osmotic tolerance analysis of AtGR2-transplatomic tobacco plants. Representative pictures of WT and transplastomic Nt-pLSC5 plants seeds germinated on 1/2 MS medium containing 0 or 300 mM mannitol for 10 days, 17 days and 24 days (A), and the germination rate was calculated (B). Vertical bars indicate means ± SE calculated from four independent biological replicates with similar results. Asterisks indicate significant differences from WT at P< 0.05. 1, Nt-wt; 2, Nt-pLSC5#3.
Figure S4Heavy metal tolerance test of AtGR2-transplatomic tobacco plants. The WT and the transplastomic Nt-pLSC5 plants seeds were germinated on 1/2 MS medium containing 0 (A), 0.2 mM (B) or 0.3 mM (C) CdCl2, 1.0 mM (D) or 1.5 mM (E) PbAc2 for three weeks. The experiments were repeated three times.
References
1
AdemM.BeyeneD.FeyissaT. (2017). Recent achievements obtained by chloroplast transformation. Plant Methods13, 30. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0179-1
2
AonoM.KuboA.SajiH.NatoriT.TanakaK.KondoN. (1991). Resistance to active oxygen toxicity of transgenic Nicotiana tabacum that expresses the gene for glutathione reductase from Escherichia coli. Plant Cell Physiol.32, 691–697. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078132
3
AonoM.KuboA.SajiH.TanakaK.KondoN. (1993). Enhanced tolerance to photooxidative stress of transgenic Nicotiana tabacum with chloroplastic glutathione reductase activity. Plant Cell Physiol.34, 129–135. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078386
4
AonoM.SajiH.SakamotoA.TanakaK.KondoN.TanakaK. (1995). Paraquat tolerance of transgenic Nicotiana tabacum with enhanced activities of glutathione reductase and superoxide dismutase. Plant Cell Physiol.36, 1687–1691. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078937
5
ApelK.HirtH. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.55, 373–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701
6
AsadaK. (2006). Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol.141, 391–396. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.082040
7
BockR. (2013). Strategies for metabolic pathway engineering with multiple transgenes. Plant Mol. Biol.83, 21–31. doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0045-0
8
BockR. (2015). Engineering plastid genomes: methods, tools, and applications in basic research and biotechnology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.66, 211–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040212
9
BrennanT.FrenkelC. (1977). Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the regulation of senescence in pear. Plant Physiol.59, 411–416. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.3.411
10
BroadbentP.CreissenG.KularB.WellburnA.MullineauxP. (1995). Oxidative stress responses in transgenic tobacco containing altered levels of glutathione reductase activity. Plant J.8, 247–255. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.08020247.x
11
ChenP. J.SenthilkumarR.JaneW. N.HeY.TianZ.YehK. W. (2014). Transplastomic Nicotiana benthamiana plants expressing multiple defence genes encoding protease inhibitors and chitinase display broad-spectrum resistance against insects, pathogens and abiotic stresses. Plant Biotechnol. J.12, 503–515. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12157
12
ClarkeJ. D. (2009). Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) DNA miniprep for plant DNA isolation. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.2009. pdb prot5177. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5177
13
ConnellJ.MulletJ. (1986). Pea chloroplast: reductase: purification and characterization. Plant Physiol.82, 351–356. doi: 10.1104/pp.82.2.351
14
CreissenG.FirminJ.FryerM.KularB.LeylandN.ReynoldsH.et al. (1999). Elevated glutathione biosynthetic capacity in the chloroplasts of transgenic tobacco plants paradoxically causes increased oxidative stress. Plant Cell11, 1277–1292. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.7.1277
15
DingS.LuQ.ZhangY.YangZ.WenX.ZhangL.et al. (2009). Enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress in transgenic tobacco plants with decreased glutathione reductase activity leads to a decrease in ascorbate pool and ascorbate redox state. Plant Mol. Biol.69, 577–592. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9440-3
16
EdwardsE.RawsthorneS.MullineauxP. (1990). Subcellular distribution of multiple forms of glutathione reductase in leaves of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Planta180, 278–284. doi: 10.1007/BF00194008
17
ElghabiZ.KarcherD.ZhouF.RufS.BockR. (2011). Optimization of the expression of the HIV fusion inhibitor cyanovirin-N from the tobacco plastid genome. Plant Biotechnol. J.9, 599–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00598.x
18
FoyerC.NoctorG. (2003). Redox sensing and signalling associated with reactive oxygen in chloroplasts, peroxisomes and mitochondria. Physiol. Plant.119, 355–364. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00223.x
19
FoyerC.SouriauN.PerretS.LelandaisM.KunertK.PruvostC. (1995). Overexpression of the glutathione reductase but not glutathione synthetase leads to increases in antioxidant capacity and resistance to hotoinhibition in poplar trees. Plant Physiol.109, 1047–1057. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.1047
20
FoyerC. H.NoctorG. (2011). Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol.155, 2–18. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167569
21
FuentesP.Armarego-MarriottT.BockR. (2017). Plastid transformation and its application in metabolic engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.49, 10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.004
22
GillS. S.AnjumN. A.HasanuzzamanM.GillR.TrivediD. K.AhmadI.et al. (2013). Glutathione and glutathione reductase: a boon in disguise for plant abiotic stress defense operations. Plant Physiol. Biochem.70, 204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.032
23
GreinerS.SobanskiJ.BockR. (2015). Why are most organelle genomes transmitted maternally? Bioessays37, 80–94. doi: 10.1002/bies.201400110
24
HasanuzzamanM.NaharK.AneeT. I.FujitaM. (2017). Glutathione in plants: biosynthesis and physiological role in environmental stress tolerance. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants23, 249–268. doi: 10.1007/s12298-017-0422-2
25
JiangM.ZhangJ. (2002). Water stress-induced abscisic acid accumulation triggers the increased generation of reactive oxygen species and up-regulates the activities of antioxidant enzymes in maize leaves. J. Exp. Bot.53, 2401–2410. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf090
26
KerchevP.De SmetB.WaszczakC.MessensJ.Van BreusegemF. (2015). Redox strategies for crop improvement. Antioxid. Redox Signal.23, 1186–1205. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.6033
27
KirkJ.AllenR. (1965). Dependence of chloroplast pigment synthesis on protein synthesis: Effect of acsidione. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.21, 530–532. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(65)90516-4
28
KornyeyevD.LoganB. A.PaytonP. R.AllenR. D.HoladayA. S. (2003). Elevated chloroplastic glutathione reductase activities decrease chilling-induced photoinhibition by increasing rates of photochemistry, but not thermal energy dissipation, in transgenic cotton. Funct. Plant Biol.30, 101. doi: 10.1071/FP02144
29
KudoA.SanoT.SajiH.TanakaK.KnodoN.TanakaK. (1993). Primary structure and properties of glutathione reductase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol.34, 1259–1266. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078548
30
KuzniakE.SklodowskaM. (2001). Ascorbate, glutathione and related enzymes in chloroplasts of tomato leaves infected by Botrytis cinerea. Plant Sci.160, 723–731. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00457-X
31
Le MartretB.PoageM.ShielK.NugentG. D.DixP. J. (2011). Tobacco chloroplast transformants expressing genes encoding dehydroascorbate reductase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione-S-transferase, exhibit altered anti-oxidant metabolism and improved abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J.9, 661–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00611.x
32
LoganB.MonteiroG.KornyeyevD.PaytonP.AllenR.HoladayA. (2003). Transgenic overproduction of glutathione reductase does not protect cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (Malvaceae), from photoinhibition during growth under chilling conditions. Am. J. Bot.90, 1400–1403. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.9.1400
33
MahanJ.BurkeJ. (1987). Purification and characterization of glutathione reductase from corn mesophyll chloroplasts. Physiol. Plant.71, 352–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1987.tb04355.x
34
MartyL.SialaW.SchwarzlanderM.FrickerM. D.WirtzM.SweetloveL. J.et al. (2009). The NADPH-dependent thioredoxin system constitutes a functional backup for cytosolic glutathione reductase in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.106, 9109–9114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900206106
35
MataA.PintoM.J.L.-B. (1984). Purification by affinity chromatography of glutathione reductase (EC 1.6.4.2) from Escherichia coli and characterization of such enzyme. Z Naturforsch.39, 908–915. doi: 10.1515/znc-1984-9-1009
36
MhamdiA.HagerJ.ChaouchS.QuevalG.HanY.TaconnatL.et al. (2010). Arabidopsis glutathione reductase1 plays a crucial role in leaf responses to intracellular hydrogen peroxide and in ensuring appropriate gene expression through both salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signaling pathways. Plant Physiol.153, 1144–1160. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.153767
37
MittlerR. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci.7, 405–410. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02312-9
38
MittovaV.TheodoulouF. L.KiddleG.GomezL.VolokitaM.TalM.et al. (2003). Coordinate induction of glutathione biosynthesis and glutathione-metabolizing enzymes is correlated with salt tolerance in tomato. FEBS Lett.554, 417–421. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01214-6
39
MullineauxP. M.RauschT. (2005). Glutathione, photosynthesis and the redox regulation of stress-responsive gene expression. Photosynth. Res.86, 459–474. doi: 10.1007/s11120-005-8811-8
40
MurashigeT.SkoogF. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant.15, 473–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
41
NoctorG.FoyerC. H. (1998). Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.49, 249–279. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249
42
NoctorG.MhamdiA.ChaouchS.HanY.NeukermansJ.Marquez-GarciaB.et al. (2012). Glutathione in plants: an integrated overview. Plant Cell Environ.35, 454–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02400.x
43
NoctorG.MhamdiA.FoyerC. H. (2016). Oxidative stress and antioxidative systems: recipes for successful data collection and interpretation. Plant Cell Environ.39, 1140–1160. doi: 10.1111/pce.12726
44
NoctorG.QuevalG.MhamdiA.ChaouchS.FoyerC. H. (2011). Glutathione. Arabidopsis Book9, e0142. doi: 10.1199/tab.0142
45
PandeyP.SinghJ.AcharyV. M. M.ReddyM. K. (2015). Redox homeostasis via gene families of ascorbate-glutathione pathway. Front. Environ. Sci.3, 25. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00025
46
Pilon-SmitsE.ZhuY.SearsT.TerryN. (2000). Overexpression of glutathione reductase in Brassica juncea: Effects on cadmium accumulation and tolerance. Physiol. Plant.110, 455–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2000.1100405.x
47
PoageM.Le MartretB.JansenM. A.NugentG. D.DixP. J. (2011). Modification of reactive oxygen species scavenging capacity of chloroplasts through plastid transformation. Plant Mol. Biol.76, 371–384. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9784-y
48
Romero-PuertasM. C.CorpasF. J.SandalioL. M.LeterrierM.Rodriguez-SerranoM.Del RioL. A.et al. (2006). Glutathione reductase from pea leaves: response to abiotic stress and characterization of the peroxisomal isozyme. New Phytol.170, 43–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01643.x
49
SvabZ.MaligaP. (1993). High-frequency plastid transformation in tobacco by selection for a chimeric aadA gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.90, 913–917. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.3.913
50
WangQ.PuY.YangD.YinX.HeZ.YangY.et al. (2018). Molecular cloning and characterization of the glutathione reductase gene from Stipa purpurea. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.495, 1851–1857. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.054
51
WaszczakC.CarmodyM.Kangasja¨RviJ. (2018). Reactive oxygen species in plant signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.69, 209–236. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040322
52
WuY.YouL.LiS.MaM.WuM.MaL.et al. (2017). In vivo assembly in Escherichia coli of transformation vectors for plastid genome engineering. Front. Plant Sci.8, 1454. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01454
53
YannarelliG.Fernández-AlvarezA.Santa-CruzD.TomaroM. (2007). Glutathione reductase activity and isoforms in leaves and roots of wheat plants subjected to cadmium stress. Phytochemistry68, 505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.11.016
54
YuX.PasternakT.EiblmeierM.DitengouF.KocherspergerP.SunJ.et al. (2013). Plastid-localized glutathione reductase2-regulated glutathione redox status is essential for Arabidopsis root apical meristem maintenance. Plant Cell25, 4451–4468. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.117028
55
ZhangJ.KhanS. A.HasseC.RufS.HeckelD. G.BockR. (2015). Full crop protection from an insect pest by expression of long double-stranded RNAs in plastids. Science347, 991–994. doi: 10.1126/science.1261680
56
ZhouF.Badillo-CoronaJ. A.KarcherD.Gonzalez-RabadeN.PiepenburgK.BorchersA. M. I.et al. (2008). High-level expression of human immunodeficiency virus antigens from the tobacco and tomato plastid genomes. Plant Biotechnol. J.6, 897–913. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00356.x
Summary
Keywords
glutathione reductase, reactive oxygen species, chloroplast, methyl viologen, tolerance
Citation
Wang B, Ding H, Chen Q, Ouyang L, Li S and Zhang J (2019) Enhanced Tolerance to Methyl Viologen-Mediated Oxidative Stress via AtGR2 Expression From Chloroplast Genome. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1178. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01178
Received
30 January 2019
Accepted
28 August 2019
Published
27 September 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Thomas Roitsch, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Reviewed by
Nobuhiro Suzuki, Sophia University, Japan; Guangxiao Yang, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Wang, Ding, Chen, Ouyang, Li and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shengchun Li, shengchun.li@hubu.edu.cn; Jiang Zhang, zhangjiang@hubu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.