Skip to main content


Front. Plant Sci., 17 February 2021
Sec. Plant Cell Biology
This article is part of the Research Topic Understanding the Key Border: Structure, Function, and Dynamics of the Plant Nuclear Envelope View all 9 articles

Maize (Zea mays L.) Nucleoskeletal Proteins Regulate Nuclear Envelope Remodeling and Function in Stomatal Complex Development and Pollen Viability

\r\nJoseph F. McKenna&#x;&#x;Joseph F. McKenna1†‡Hardeep K. Gumber&#x;&#x;Hardeep K. Gumber2†‡Zachary M. TurpinZachary M. Turpin2Alexis M. JalovecAlexis M. Jalovec2Andre C. KartickAndre C. Kartick2Katja Graumann*Katja Graumann3*Hank W. Bass*&#x;Hank W. Bass2*†
  • 1School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States
  • 3Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom

In eukaryotes, the nuclear envelope (NE) encloses chromatin and separates it from the rest of the cell. The Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complex physically bridges across the NE, linking nuclear and cytoplasmic components. In plants, these LINC complexes are beginning to be ascribed roles in cellular and nuclear functions, including chromatin organization, regulation of nuclei shape and movement, and cell division. Homologs of core LINC components, KASH and SUN proteins, have previously been identified in maize. Here, we characterized the presumed LINC-associated maize nucleoskeletal proteins NCH1 and NCH2, homologous to members of the plant NMCP/CRWN family, and MKAKU41, homologous to AtKAKU4. All three proteins localized to the nuclear periphery when transiently and heterologously expressed as fluorescent protein fusions in Nicotiana benthamiana. Overexpression of MKAKU41 caused dramatic changes in the organization of the nuclear periphery, including nuclear invaginations that stained positive for non-nucleoplasmic markers of the inner and outer NE membranes, and the ER. The severity of these invaginations was altered by changes in LINC connections and the actin cytoskeleton. In maize, MKAKU41 appeared to share genetic functions with other LINC components, including control of nuclei shape, stomatal complex development, and pollen viability. Overall, our data show that NCH1, NCH2, and MKAKU41 have characteristic properties of LINC-associated plant nucleoskeletal proteins, including interactions with NE components suggestive of functions at the nuclear periphery that impact the overall nuclear architecture.


In plant cells, as with all eukaryotes, the nucleus is a conspicuous and characteristic organelle, housing the DNA (reviewed by Meier et al., 2017). The nucleus itself is a dynamic structure, organized largely by its enclosing membrane system - the nuclear envelope (NE). The NE is a double-membraned structure composed of an outer nuclear membrane (ONM) and an inner nuclear membrane (INM) connected at nuclear pores (reviewed by Hetzer, 2010; Graumann and Evans, 2017). The functional properties of the NE are mediated by protein complexes linked to myriad cellular and nuclear processes, including cell division and gene expression (Kim et al., 2015; Meier et al., 2017; De Magistris and Antonin, 2018; Pradillo et al., 2019). A major conserved NE complex is the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex (Crisp et al., 2006), known for it involvement in processes such as the maintenance of nuclear architecture and mechanical structures, signaling, nuclear motility, and nuclear positioning (reviewed by Rothballer and Kutay, 2013; Chang et al., 2015; Tamura et al., 2015; Pradillo et al., 2019; Starr, 2019). Well beyond the historically recognized role of compartmentalization, NE investigations increasingly address how the NE contributes to both general and specialized functions in plant growth and development. The underlying molecular mechanisms coordinating and regulating these fundamental NE processes remain, however, largely unknown.

The hallmark of LINC complexes is their ability to form direct connections bridging the cytoplasm and the nucleoplasm. This is accomplished by a core complex of two groups of proteins, residing on the two separate membranes of the NE. The INM houses the Sad1/UNC84 homology (SUN) domain proteins and the ONM houses the Klarsicht/ANC-1/Syne homology (KASH) proteins (Hagan and Yanagida, 1995; Malone et al., 1999; Starr, 2002; Murphy et al., 2010). As a group, the KASH proteins are numerous and diverse, reflecting their various cytoplasmic binding partners, such as cytoskeletal and motor proteins (Starr and Fridolfsson, 2010; Luxton and Starr, 2014; Kim et al., 2015; Evans and Graumann, 2018; Starr, 2019). In contrast, the SUN-domain proteins are less diverse but still exhibit interactions with multiple components of the nucleoplasm, such as nucleoskeletal components and chromatin proteins (Haque et al., 2006; Janin et al., 2017). While cytoskeletal components of LINC complexes and the SUN proteins appear conserved in eukaryotes, plants have evolved unique KASH proteins and nucleoskeletal components. Plant nucleoskeletal components, while lacking sequence homology, share many of the animal lamin features, including interactions with the NE and their ability to impact chromatin structure and gene expression (Masuda et al., 1997; Dittmer et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2013; Ciska and Moreno Dí-az de la Espina, 2014; Goto et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017; Choi et al., 2019; Ciska et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2019; Sakamoto, 2020).

Plant nucleoskeletal proteins that interact directly or indirectly with the NE fall into two families of proteins. One family, the Nuclear Matrix Constituent Proteins/Crowded Nuclei (NMCP/CRWN) proteins, is found in plants with members encoded by the NMCP genes in carrot (Masuda et al., 1997), CRWN genes in Arabidopsis (Dittmer et al., 2007), and NCH genes in maize (Gumber et al., 2019a). The other family is also found in plants and encoded by the AtKAKU4 gene in Arabidopsis (Goto et al., 2014) and the MKAKU41 and MKAKU42 genes in maize (Gumber et al., 2019a). Here we refer to these two gene or protein families generally as CRWN and KAKU4.

In Arabidopsis, CRWN1 is located primarily at the nuclear periphery and interacts with SUN-domain proteins (Dittmer et al., 2007; Graumann, 2014). CRWN proteins have been implicated in the regulation of nuclear shape, nuclear size, chromatin organization, regulation of gene expression, and nuclear body formation in plants (reviewed in Sakamoto, 2020). KAKU4 was shown to interact with CRWN1 by yeast two-hybrid analysis, supporting their cooperation in the form and function of a plant nucleoskeletal system (Goto et al., 2014). Fluorescent protein fusions driven by native promoter expression and electron microscopy showed that KAKU4 is localized to the inner nuclear membrane. Interestingly, when high-expression stable lines were selected or high-expression transient transformation was performed, KAKU4 appeared to induce nuclear invaginations, which increased significantly when co-expressed with CRWN1 (Goto et al., 2014).

Together, the CRWN and KAKU proteins are known to affect phenotypes in eudicots, yet their roles in crop species are less well understood. Two maize CRWN homologs are known; NCH1 which is most closely related to AtCRWN1-3, and NCH2 which is most closely AtCRWN4. Maize MKAKU41 homologs are encoded by MKAKU41 and MKAKU42 (Gumber et al., 2019a). To investigate the functional conservation of these presumed nucleoskeletal proteins in maize, we characterized NCH1 and NCH2 and MKAKU4 using cytological or genetic approaches.


Maize NCH1, NCH2, and MKAKU41 Localized to the Nucleus, Primarily at the Nuclear Periphery

In order to determine the cellular localization of the maize CRWN homologs NCH1, NCH2, and the KAKU4 homolog MKAKU41, we produced gene constructs with the protein coding region fused to either GFP or mCherry at the N-terminus. We then expressed these constructs transiently in N. benthamiana leaf tissue. All three constructs localized to the nuclear periphery with MKAKU41 also exhibiting internal structures as shown in Figure 1 for nuclei counterstained with DAPI. In order to confirm that NCH1 and NCH2 were localized at the nuclear periphery, we performed co-expression of NCH1 or NCH2 with AtCRWN1 (Supplementary Figure 1). The co-localization of NCH with CRWN confirmed that NCH1 and NCH2 did localize to the nuclear periphery when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana. Interestingly, MKAKU41 showed nuclear envelope labeling and inner nucleus labeling in most cells, including membrane invaginations (Figure 1A, white arrowheads), as has been described for Arabidopsis KAKU4 when expressed under the control of the 35S promoter (Goto et al., 2014). These included internal structures and circular ring-like invaginations within the nucleus. The structures labeled with MKAKU41 colocalized with brighter DAPI staining regions, implying that MKAKU41 may associate with heterochromatin. The ring-like invaginations lacked internal DAPI staining and therefore appeared devoid of typical nucleoplasmic chromatin. Interestingly, the CRWN1 homolog NCH1 alone also caused these aberrant-looking intranuclear structures (Figure 1A, white arrow), although to a lesser extent than MKAKU41. However, NCH2, a CRWN4 homolog (Ciska et al., 2019), did not induce ring-like invaginations. The NCH1 and NCH2 also displayed different mobility proportions at the nuclear periphery (Figure 1B and Supplementary Figures 1B–F) as determined by Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP). NCH2 was significantly less mobile (16% mobile fraction) than NCH1 (49% mobility) indicating that they might interact with different protein complexes or structures. The lower mobility of NCH2 compared to NCH1 is consistent with its reduced capacity to remodel the nuclear envelope membrane and cause invaginations (Figure 1). The large immobile fraction of NCH2, but not NCH1, was comparable to that of AtCRWN1 (Graumann, 2014).


Figure 1. The maize proteins NCH1, NCH2 and MKAKU41 localize to the nuclear envelope. (A) Confocal imaging of N. benthamiana transiently expressing NCH1, NCH2 and MKAKU41 as fluorescent protein fusions (green/magenta) and nuclei labeled with DAPI (blue). Both MKAKU41 and NCH1 show nuclear invaginations (white arrowheads) and labeling at the nuclear envelope (white boxes). NCH2 shows predominantly nuclear peripheral localization. Scale bar denotes 5 μm. (B) FRAP analysis demonstrates that NCH1 has a larger mobile fraction than NCH2 at the nuclear periphery. n ≥ 30 nuclei imaged across three experimental replicates.

It has been demonstrated that the degree of nuclear invagination and deformation is dependent on the expression level of KAKU4 in A. thaliana (Goto et al., 2014). We therefore asked if this causal relationship was conserved in the maize genes, MKAKU41, NCH1, and NCH2, using the dose-response transient expression assays summarized in Figure 2. We infiltrated N. benthamiana with three different concentrations of Agrobacterium, OD 0.01, 0.05, or 0.1, and then classified live-imaged nuclei (N ≥ 30 per condition) into one of three previously described nuclear periphery cytological image patterns (Goto et al., 2014): type I for normal nuclear periphery localization, type II for minor invagintions or inclusions in the nucleus, and type III for major invaginations and deformation of the nucleus. This classification assisted with a comparative analysis of the severity of changes in nuclear morphology across the various experiments used throughout this study. Increasing the infiltration concentration of NCH1 resulted in progressively increased nuclear deformation illustrated by type II pattern increases and the appearance of type III at the highest transfection dose (Figure 2A). NCH2 also showed a transfection dose-dependent increase in nuclear aberration coupled to type II increases, but less so and without any type III nuclei even at the highest dose (Figure 2B). For MKAKU41, increasing the transfecting plasmid concentration led from most nuclei just showing peripheral localization initially to slightly under half showing type III patterns with severe invaginations seen at the highest concentration (Figure 2C). We interpret these results as establishing that because all three of the proteins tested showed they could cause dose-dependent increases in severity of nuclear deformation patterns, they can all be considered to be part of the same process, one needed to properly organize a nuclear periphery compartment within interphase nuclei.


Figure 2. The concentration of NCH1, NCH2 and MKAKU41 affects the level of nuclei invagination and disruption. Confocal live cell imaging of NCH1, NCH2 and MKAKU41 shows that increasing the concentration of NCH1 and MKAKU41 increases nuclei disruption. Nuclei were classified as per (Goto et al., 2014) into Type I, Normal nuclear envelope localization; Type II, Minor invaginations and predominantly nuclear envelope localization; or Type III, major disruption of nuclei structure. (A) NCH1, (B) NCH2, and (C) MKAKU41. Scale bar denotes 5 μm. n ≥ 30 nuclei imaged across three experimental replicates.

Co-expression of NCH1 or NCH2 With MKAKU41 Showed a Synergistic Effect on Invagination and Nuclear Deformation Phenotypes

The Arabidopsis CRWN1 and KAKU4 have previously been shown to result in increased nuclear deformation and invaginations when co-expressed (Goto et al., 2014). In order to determine whether the maize homologs similarly affect the nuclear organization pathway, we co-expressed MKAKU41 with either NCH1 or NCH2 as presented in Figure 3. Upon co-expression, the nuclear invaginations and deformations were substantially enhanced compared to single-expression (Figure 3A). Quantifying the most severe phenotype (type III), we observed that NCH1 alone exhibited 7% and MKAKU41 alone exhibited 42%. However, the combination of NCH1 and MKAKU41 exhibited 88% type III, well beyond the combined value of 49%, and thus synergistic for this measurement. Similarly, the NCH2 and MKAKU41 co-expression reached a level of 66% type III nuclei, considerably more than 42% sum of the single-expressed levels. Therefore, NCH proteins appeared to act cooperatively with MKAKU41 to affect nuclear periphery organization as judged by changes in their localization patterns. This cumulative effect on nuclear structure suggests that NCH1/NCH2 and MKAKU41 may act in the same protein complex. We tested this idea by checking for evidence of interaction between NCH and MKAKU41 in planta using acceptor photobleaching fluorescence resonance energy transfer (apFRET). A significant rise in FRET efficiencies would indicate interactions and such was measured when NCH1 and NCH2 were co-expressed with MKAKU41, compared to a non-interacting control, calnexin (Figure 3C). Internal control FRET efficiency% values were very low, as expected for non-bleached controls (Supplementary Table 1). This demonstrated that NCH1 and NCH2 can interact with MKAKU41, and is consistent with their synergistic effect on levels of nuclear deformations. This observation is similar to that observed for Arabidopsis homologs using yeast two-hybrid system and plant expression (Goto et al., 2014). Importantly, our findings provide evidence from live imaging for in planta interactions between these proteins at the nuclear periphery.


Figure 3. Coexpression of NCH1 or NCH2 with MKAKU41 enhances nuclear invaginations and NCH1 and NCH2 interact with MKAKU41. (A) Confocal images of N. benthamiana coexpressing NCH1 or NCH2 with MKAKU41. (B) Quantification of nuclear morphologies for nuclei expressing single MKAKU41, NCH1, NCH2; or co-expression of NCH1 or NCH2 with MKAKU41; classified into types I, II, or III as described in Figure 2. Scale bar denotes 5 μm. (C) The apFRET efficiency (%) demonstrates in planta interactions of NCH1 and NCH2 with MKAKU41 in comparison with control (CNX). Solid lines underneath plots denote negative controls, hashed positive control. Key statistical comparisons shown and more fully tabulated in Supplementary Table 1. Red line denotes mean, blue standard deviation. One-way ANOVA statistical test performed. ****p ≤ 0.0001. n ≥ 30 nuclei imaged across three experimental replicates for all experiments described.

MKAKU41 Overexpression Remodeled Other Inner and Outer Nuclear Membrane Proteins

Both AtKAKU4 and MKAKU41 cause deformation of the NE and disruption of nuclei structure when co-expressed with AtCRWN1 (Goto et al., 2014), NCH1, or NCH2 (Figure 3). To further investigate whether this involves the entire NE, we asked whether overexpression of MKAKU41 can result in the invagination of other proteins not previously tested but known to localize to either the INM, the ONM, or the ER. For this we used AtSUN2-YFP to mark the INM, ZmMLKP1-GFP to mark the ONM, and calnexin-GFP to mark the ER membrane. Figure 4 shows that each of these markers showed normal nuclear periphery localization when expressed individually. However, upon co-expression with MKAKU41, all of these proteins appeared in aberrant intranuclear structures. Therefore, the expression of MKAKU41 appears to have caused the internalization of the entire NE, including the calnexin-GFP ER membrane marker, demonstrating that MKAKU41-induced nuclei deformations and invaginations are not limited to nucleoplasmic and INM LINC proteins.


Figure 4. MKAKU41-induced nuclear invaginations incorporate other nuclear envelope- and ER-localized proteins. (A) Confocal imaging showing that the outer nuclear Maize membrane markers MLKP1, Arabidopsis nuclear envelope proteins SUN2 and SUN2ΔNterm, and the ER membrane marker CNX are incorporated into invaginations when co-expressed with MKAKU41. Next to confocal images are percentages of nuclei which show deformations as classified previously. (B) SUN2 and SUN2ΔNterm show different incorporation into MKAKU41 induced nuclear invaginations. Graphs show 4 μm normalized line profiles over SUN2 or SUN2ΔNterm Invaginations (solid white lines) and nuclear membrane (dotted white lines). Locations of line profiles can be seen in confocal micrographs. (C) Ratio of Sub-periphery/whole nuclei fluorescence of SUN2 and SUN2ΔNterm when expressed on their own or with MKAKU41. One-way ANOVA statistical test performed; ****p ≤ 0.0001. n ≥ 30 for each condition.

Previously, it has been shown that AtSUN1 and AtSUN2 interact with AtCRWN1, mediated by the SUN N-terminus (Graumann, 2014) and that the deletion construct SUN2ΔNterm could disrupt SUN-CRWN interactions (Graumann et al., 2010; Graumann, 2014). To investigate more specifically the role of the LINC complex in producing these aberrant nuclear structures, we overexpressed SUN2ΔNterm as a way to abrogate CRWN-SUN binding and thereby possibly reduce the interaction of MKAKU41 with the LINC complex. Notably, SUN2-MKAKU41 co-expression resulted in mostly type III nuclei, whereas the SUN2ΔNterm-MKAKU41 co-expression led to less deformation, with nuclei showing mostly type II phenotype (Figure 4A). Interestingly, nuclear envelope fluorescent labeling of full-length SUN2 appeared lower than that in SUN2ΔNterm when co-expressed with MKAKU41 (Figures 4A,B). Signal intensity line profiles drawn over the nuclear invagination (Figure 4A, dashed line) or nuclear envelope (Figure 4A, solid line) regions showed that the SUN2 full length signal was much stronger within the invaginations but lower at the nuclear envelope when compared to those from SUN2ΔNterm fluorescence (Figure 4B). We quantified the effect of co-expressed MKAKU41 on the SUN2’s tendency for peripheral staining by determining the percentage of the signal in the interior versus the entire nucleus (sub-periphery/whole nucleus/, Supplementary Figure 2). For instance, if the signal was entirely peripheral, the percentage would be at or near zero. Figure 4C shows an increase in internal fluorescence for SUN2 in the SUN2 - MKAKU41 co-expression compared to SUN2 alone (p < 0.0001). Therefore, full length SUN2 is relocated away from the nuclear periphery when coexpressed with MKAKU41. The relative internal nuclear fluorescence also increased upon SUN2ΔNterm coexpression with MKAKU41 (p < 0.001), but to a lesser extent than for full length SUN2 (p < 0.001). These observations implicate the LINC complex and more specifically the nucleoplasmic N-terminal domain of the NE protein, SUN2, in the formation of aberrant MKAKU41-dependent intranuclear structures.

Impairing Nuclear Actin Anchoring Enhances Nuclear Invaginations

In addition to the SUN2 NE protein which spans the INM and has direct contact with the nucleoplasm, we also examined an ONM maker, MLKS2, and its ARM domain deletion derivative previously shown to be impaired for actin binding (Gumber et al., 2019b). Upon co-expression with MKAKU41, the ONM marker MLKS2 also appeared in intranuclear invagination-like structures as shown in Figure 5A. Upon co-expression of MKAKU4 and MLKS2ΔARM, nuclear deformations and invaginations were observed (Figure 5A) and found to much more severe and abundant (Figure 5B) compared to those from co-expression of MKAKU4 and the full length MLKS2. Therefore, the ONM KASH protein MLKS2 is brought moved to intranuclear structures by MKAKU41 co-expression, and loss of the actin-interacting ARM domain exacerbates the situation and implicates cytoplasmic F-actin in NE and nuclear periphery remodeling.


Figure 5. Nuclear actin anchoring is important for regulating nuclei deformations upon MKAKU41 overexpression. (A) Confocal live cell imaging of MLKS2 and MLKS2ΔARM single and co-expresssion with MKAKU41. (B) All nuclei imaged were categorized on the level of disruption as described previously. (C) Number of nuclei invaginations at different MKAKU41 expression levels with actin depolymerized (LatB). (D) Sub-periphery/whole nuclei fluorescence ratio from nuclei expressing different levels of MKAKU41 (MK, from 0 to 0.1) with and without actin depolymerization (LatB). Nuclei were imaged with the NE marker LBR-GFP. Scale bar denotes 5 μm. n ≥ 30 nuclei imaged across three experimental replicates for panels A and B). For Panels C and D, one-way ANOVA statistical test performed; ns p ≥ 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001. n ≥ 60 across three biological replicates.

In order to further probe the interaction between peri-nuclear actin and MKAKU41-induced nuclear deformations, we used Latrunculin-B (LatB) to depolymerize the actin cytoskeleton as described previously (McKenna et al., 2019). Figure 5C shows that upon expression of MKAKU41 at a moderate level (O.D. 0.05), LatB depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of invaginations (p ≤ 0.001). While this trend existed at lower (O.D. 0.01) and higher transfection concentrations (O.D. 0.10), it was not statistically significant. To further explore the connection between the actin cytoskeleton and MKAKU41 induced nuclear deformations, we examined the interior versus peripheral signal ratios (Supplementary Figure 2) and found that actin depolymerization quantitatively shifted the INM NE marker, LBR, toward increased interior signal (Figure 5D). This same effect was seen and found to be statistically significant for two concentrations of MKAKU41 infiltration (O.D. 0.01) (p = 0.01) and 0.05 (p = 0.05). This demonstrates that at the moderate transfection concentration of (O.D. 0.05), actin depolymerization with LatB increases the internalization of peripheral markers. These findings corroborate those from the MLKS2ΔARM experiments in that they implicate F-actin as a possible factor that can provide an opposing force or counterbalance to nucleoskeletal proteins which can invaginate the NE and create inclusion bodies in a concentration-dependent manner.

Transposon Disruption of the MKAKU41 Gene Co-segregates With Phenotypic Effects on Nuclear Shape and Development

Having seen that overexpression of maize MKAKU41 in a eudicot species resulted in nuclear architecture disruption and severe nuclear envelope misplacement, we wanted to examine the role of this gene in its native genetic background, maize. From the UniformMu transposon mutagenesis project, we found and characterized a Mutator-tagged allele of MKAKU41, allowing for a genetic examination of the biological consequences of gene disruption in maize.

The transposon-tagged allele, here designated mkaku41, and its wild-type counterpart, MKAKU41, are shown in Figure 6. The wild-type MKAKU41 gene (Zm00004b040444) from the color-converted W22 inbred is annotated as being associated with three transcript models. The gene structure for transcript model T01 (Figure 6A) spans 7.9 kb, with 11 exons producing an mRNA with a single large ORF predicted to encode a protein of 579 AA. The transposon insertion site (mu1005806) is located in the 5’ UTR (Figure 6B). The transposon insertion allele was characterized by genomic PCR analysis (Figure 6C) using various combinations of primers that were flanking the insertion site, and were gene-specific and Mutator-specific (Figure 6A, primers F, T, R). These PCR products were visualized (Figure 6C) and sequenced (Figure 6D) from the W22 wild type progenitor (W22 +) as well as F2 individuals from families segregating for mkaku41 (+ / +, ±, or -/-), where the “-” symbol denotes the transposon-insertion allele. These PCR primers and PCR gel products were used for plant genotyping in subsequent analyses.


Figure 6. Gene structure of wild-type and transposon-tagged alleles of MKAKU41. (A) Gene model of MKAKU41 (transcript model “T01”) showing the positions of exons (black boxes), introns (gray), the 5′ and 3′ UTRs, the transposon-insertion (Mu), transposon-specific Tir6 PCR primers (T arrows), and the Mu-flanking gene-specific PCR primers (F, R arrows). (B) Diagram of the MuDR insertion site within the 95 bp 5’ UTR, showing the locations of the 9 bp target site repeat (green, bp 64–72 in the mkaku41-T01 transcript model) and a 25 bp query sequence (yellow) used for transcript analysis. (C) PCR Genotyping for presence or absence of the Mu-tagged allele. The PCR products using various pairings of gene-specific (F, R) or transposon-specific primer pairs (T). Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel 100 bp size marker (lane M) and single-plant PCR products (other lanes) from W22 + or select mkaku41 F2 siblings to illustrate wildtype (+ / +), heterozygous (±), or mutant (-/-) PCR genotype patterns from the PCR (arrows at right of gel). (D) Sequence of cloned and sequenced amplicons are aligned and show the progenitor W22 (W22 reference) and F2 segregants. The + / + individuals from the transposon mutagenesis stocks were found to be heterozygous for a 2 bp indel (–). The sequences corresponding to a 25 bp query sequence (yellow highlight), the 9 bp insertion site (green highlight), the transposon (lowercase, garnet text), and the start codon (underlined ATG) are indicated. The Mu insertion occured in the allele with the 2 bp deletion and produced a flanking 9 bp target site duplication. (E) Strand-specific transcriptome analysis is summarized for perfect match occurrences of the query sequence in libraries made from wildtype (top) or mutant (bottom) plants. All of the sense transcripts from the mutant allele had an extremely short (∼21 bp or less) 5’UTR.

By inspection of the junction sequences between the wild-type reference W22 genome and the transposon (Figure 6D, lower case letters), we identified the 9-bp target site duplication as CTCCTCTC (color coded green in Figure 6). These results confirmed that the transposon was inserted in the 5’ UTR at a position 23 bp upstream of the start codon, disrupting the majority of the wild-type 95 bp 5’ UTR. The location of this insertion, while not in the protein coding region of the gene, is within the first exon and its location is expected, therefore, to disrupt the expression or transcript structure of the gene. Surprisingly, from transcriptome analysis we found that the gene expression levels for MKAKU41, measured as total normalized reads across the gene model, were similar in libraries made from wildtype and mutant leaf and tassel. We mined the transcript data to investigate the effect of the transposon insertion on the 5’ UTR region by searching for the presence of a unique 25 bp 5’ UTR sequence located just upstream of the mapped insertion site (Figures 6D,E, “Query sequence” highlighted in yellow). We found a total of 70 matches to our 25 bp query sequence in our transcriptome, which was sequenced at a depth of over 100 M reads per tissue-genotype combination (Figure 6E). All 70 occurrences of the query sequence were from the wildtype libraries except for one, which was on the reverse strand relative to the gene (Figure 6E). These results indicate that the 5’ UTR was indeed disrupted in the mutant plants. In addition to this detailed analysis of MKAKU41, some differentially expressed genes (Supplementary Table 2) were observed in mutant versus wild-type leaf and meiotic-enriched whole tassel, but gene ontology analysis did not reveal any clear and reproducible enrichments that differed from those of randomized controls.

We next explored the phenotypic consequences of the mkaku41 transposon insertion on root hair nuclei, stomatal complex, and pollen viability, as summarized in Figure 7. The root hair nuclei in W22 + (normal) and mkaku41 mutant seedlings 5 days after imbibition were imaged and their shapes were analyzed (Figures 7A–F). The mutant nuclei were visually and quantitatively more rounded than their wildtype counterparts. The mutant nuclei had an average maximum length of 22 μm whereas their wild-type counterparts averaged 34 μm (Figure 7G). The mutant nuclei also exhibited a higher circularity index than the wildtype nuclei (Figure 7H). Both measures (n = 50) were statistically significant as determined using T-test, two-tailed with p < 0.0001.


Figure 7. Somatic phenotypes of mkaku41. DAPI-stained root hair nuclei in W22+ (A–C) and mkaku41 (D–F) seedlings. (G) Longest diameter of W22+ and mkaku41 root hair nuclei (n = 50). (H) Nuclear circularity index measurements using 4π(area/perimeter2), where 1 = perfect circle, of W22 + and mkaku41 root hair nuclei calculated using Fiji. (I) Mature stomatal complex in W22 + DAPI-stained leaf where two central dumbbell-shaped guard cells (GC) are surrounded by two subsidiary cells (SC). (J–N) Representative images of stomatal complexes in mkaku41 DAPI-stained leaves. Arrows point to extra or irregularly placed subsidiary cells. Scale bars are 10 μm. *****Student’s t-test two-tailed, p < 0.0001. (O–Q) Differential staining of anthers for testing pollen viability from W22+ (O) and mkaku41 -/- (P,Q) tassels stained with modified Alexander’s stain where viable pollen grains appear magenta and aborted pollen grains appear green. (R) Quantification of pollen viability, n > 1000 per genotype. (S) Degree of pollen roundness 4area/(πmajor_axis^2) calculated for W22 + and mkaku41-/- anthers using Fiji. Scale bars are 50 μm. *****Student’s t-test two-tailed, p < 0.0001.

Next, we analyzed two above-ground phenotypes, the appearances of stomatal complexes and pollen. In W22 + plants, a normal stomatal complex is composed of two guard cells flanked by two subsidiary cells as shown for W22 + (Figure 7I). In contrast, mutant plants showed irregular stomatal complexes composed of two normal-looking guard cells flanked by one or two extra and irregularly positioned subsidiary cells (arrows, Figures 7J–N). For the pollen phenotypes, we assayed viability and shape (Figures 7O–R). Using the modified Alexander’s differential staining method, we found that the percent of viable pollen was dramatically reduced in the mutant, from 84 to 46%. The shape of the pollen was also affected in the mutant, where the average degree of roundness decreased from 0.93 to 0.7. Both measures (n > 1,000 for staining, n = 100 for roundness) were statistically significant as determined using a two-tailed T-test with p < 0.0001.

Taken together, these findings show that the mkaku41 mutation was associated with multiple phenotypes including root hair nuclear shape, stomatal complex development, and pollen viability. Therefore, MKAKU41 appears to act in some of the same genetic pathways as the NE-associated LINC complex proteins such as SUN and KASH. This genetic data in maize is interesting when considered with our findings that heterologous overexpression phenotypes and actin perturbations (Figures 15) disrupt nuclear architecture and nuclear envelope organization. Taken together, all of these experiments establish biological roles for MKAKU41, NCH1, and NCH2 as nucleoskeletal proteins that regulate fundamental nuclear processes in cellular structure and function.


Regulation of nucleus size and shape is important for many fundamental cellular processes in all eukaryotes. Nuclear architecture is controlled by multiple interactions involving the NE, NE-associated complexes, and the nucleoskeleton. Here, we characterized multiple maize nucleoskeletal proteins, which, like their animal counterparts, controlled nuclear dynamics. An overarching goal motivating this study is to establish the general rules that apply across the plant domain, an evolutionarily vast space. Toward this goal, we have utilized the tobacco transient heterologous expression assay as a powerful and versatile experimental platform for plant nuclear envelope research. In this study and previously, we have established cellular localization, protein-protein interactions, dose-response phenotypes, and live cell imaging that allows for kymographic analysis, mobility via FRAP, and interactions via AP-FRET, all of which have enabled and accelerated our understanding of grass and model crop NE biology (Gumber et al., 2019a,b).

The maize nucleoskeletal proteins examined in this study are NCH1, NCH2 and MKAKU41, each of which has one or more homologs (Figure 1A) in eudicot species (Gumber et al., 2019a) and all of which exhibit nuclear localization and NE enrichment in heterologous expression systems. Interaction data from this (Figure 3C) and prior studies further indicate that these proteins are coupled to the NE via the LINC complex. These findings, together with those from other plant species, point to the broad conservation of plant nucleoskeletal proteins across angiosperms (Goto et al., 2014; Meier et al., 2017; Ciska et al., 2019; Sakamoto, 2020). The functional conservation of these components is evidenced by previously reported cross-species functional rescue (Gumber et al., 2019b) and by the current study where we show that the maize MKAKU41 (Figure 4) interacts with Arabidopsis AtSUN2, causing altered nuclear localization of the Arabidopsis AtSUN2.

Multiple lines of evidence for conservation of plant LINC complexes are also seen at the organismal and phenotypic level. For instance, we (Figure 7) and others found that mutant phenotypes commonly include the rounding up of root hair nuclei, disruption of stomatal complex development, and effects on pollen shape and viability (Dittmer et al., 2007; Goto et al., 2014, 2020; Zhou et al., 2014; Gumber et al., 2019b; Newman-Griffis et al., 2019). The nuclear shape defects in root hairs have become a hallmark of LINC defects in plants, and as such were predicted. However, the stomatal complex and pollen shape phenotypes have not been previously observed for plant mutants of MKAKU4 genes, but they resemble to some extent those of the plant KASH mutant, mlks2 (Gumber et al., 2019b). To gain genetic insight into these nucleoskeletal proteins in the crop species maize, we searched for transposon-disrupted alleles of MKAKU41, NCH1, and NCH2. Of these, we found that the MKAKU41 gene was reported to have a Mutator insertion (McCarty and Meeley, 2009), described here as the first known mutant allele, mkaku41. The insertion site was in the 5’-UTR (Figure 6), a common hot-spot for Mu insertion (Zhang et al., 2020). The transcript abundance was not significantly reduced in the mutants, but the mutant allele produced an extremely truncated 5’ UTR of 23 bp or less. Given that the median 5’ UTR length in maize was recently determined to be 132 bp (Leppek et al., 2018), such an extremely short 5′ UTR in the mkaku41 mutants may abolish or greatly decrease the ability of the cell to utilize the native start codon for translation of the full-length protein. If the mutant 5’ UTR is too short for efficient ribosome assembly and scanning, the next in-frame start codon is considerably farther downstream, which would result in a loss of the first 125 AA. Additionally, the mutant 5’UTR may lack regulatory mRNA sequences in the first ∼70 bases of the full-length transcript. Further genetic and experimental analyses with new alleles, gene editing, or application of specific biotic or abiotic stresses will be needed to gain a better understanding of how these plant nucleoskeletal proteins functionally interact with the genomes they help to organize.

The regulation of nuclear morphology and intra-nuclear organization was further explored to gain mechanistic insight, using the tobacco transient expression assay with fluorescently tagged proteins and quantitative microscopic analyses. We used this approach to explore multiple aspects of the remarkable nuclear architecture disruption caused by overexpression of each of the three maize nucleoskeletal proteins examined. The severity of the nuclear disruption and of the NE invaginations was increased by co-overexpression of two components (e.g., MKAKU41 with NCH1 or NCH2), or by increasing the transfecting plasmid concentration, expected to increase their expression levels. These findings (Figure 2) and previous studies from plants and animals reveal that proper nucleoskeleton protein concentration may be a primary determinant for overall nuclear architecture (Goto et al., 2014; Legartová et al., 2014; Jorgens et al., 2017).

In addition to protein abundance, components of the nuclear invaginations were tested for the presence of LINC and ER proteins. Knowing that SUN proteins interact with ONM KASH proteins as part of the core LINC complex, we tested whether the intranuclear foci of MKAKU41-FP reflected protein aggregates of entire NE, checking for colocalization with two types of markers, those in the NE but not the LINC complex or those in the ER membrane. All of these, including multiple ONM markers, colocalized with the aberrant intranuclear structures (Figures 4, 5), demonstrating that these intranuclear structures contain components from both the INM and ONM of the nuclear envelope. These plant nuclei invaginations may contain, therefore, the entire NE proteome as well as NE-associated chromatin that would normally be limited to the nuclear periphery. Such invaginations are known to occur in plants and animals, which can show grooves, deformations, actin, or ER in stable structures seen as deep invaginations (Collings et al., 2000; Schermelleh et al., 2008). Interestingly, the membrane invaginations and deformations caused by MKAKU41 also resemble to some extent animal nuclear deformations associated with Lamin-A mis-expression (Lammerding et al., 2004; Schreiber and Kennedy, 2013; Swift et al., 2013; Legartová et al., 2014).

In our experimental set up, we disrupted the LINC complex at two different connections to investigate the effect of these disruptions on the NE structure. The first, a SUN2ΔN, severed the LINC-to-nucleoskeleton connection; the second MLKS2ΔARM, severed the LINC-to-cytoskeleton connection. It is quite interesting that these two disruptions exhibited contrasting effects on the severity of invaginations. Our domain-deletion analyses showed that perturbation of the LINC-to-nucleoskeleton connection reduced the severity (Figure 4A), whereas preventing the LINC-to-cytoskeleton connection increased the severity of invaginations (Figure 5). This has important mechanobiological implications for the idea that plant nuclear shape involves a balance of forces between actin-nucleus interactions and nucleoskeletal components. Interestingly, AtKAKU4, arabidopsis KASH proteins WIPs, and NE-associated myosin are all involved in nuclear migration in various cellular processes, such as in pollen-tube growth (Meier et al., 2017; Goto et al., 2020), which also involves changes in actin dynamics.

Moving the nucleus exerts physical stress on the NE and the opposing forces of the LINC components (nucleoskeletal and cytoskeletal) are expected to be, therefore, important for maintaining NE integrity and stability (Enyedi and Niethammer, 2017). The contrasting effects on NE integrity that we observe in this study are an indicator that maize nucleoskeletal components may be functionally associated with just such a tug-of-war process that manifests as regulation of nuclear shape. Multiple lines of evidence are consistent with this idea, including the change to spherical nuclei caused by genetic knockouts of a nuclear-envelope-localized myosin (Tamura et al., 2013) and the rounding up of root hair nuclei caused by the maize mlks2 mutation (Gumber et al., 2019b). Along these lines, our study adds to the growing body of evidence that plants deploy a general mechanism for nuclear shape in which a balance of forces is achieved through LINC-interacting components on both sides of the NE, ensuring its structure and function as a flexible cellular partition. In the current study, we note multiple indications (Figure 5) that support this tug-of-war type arrangement. These ideas align with results from mammalian studies that identify roles for the LINC complex in mediating mechanical crosstalk between the cytoplasm and nucleus (Alam et al., 2016; Jorgens et al., 2017; Agrawal and Lele, 2019; Bouzid et al., 2019; Hieda, 2019).

Previous investigations of CRWN and KAKU4 have focused on chromatin structure and nuclear architecture (Dittmer et al., 2007; Grob et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2019), but our studies indicate that nucleoplasmic disruptions can also affect normal developmental processes, an important finding for crop species. In animals, the interplay between cellular-level structural integrity and genomic responses to environmental and developmental processes is increasingly recognized as a complex process involving lamins as central players (Gerbino et al., 2018). This study advances our knowledge of the plant nucleoskeleton by identifying the components and their roles in regulating fundamental dynamic processes of the plant nuclear envelope.

Materials and Methods


Maize gene constructs and sequence information for the clones used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 3. NCH1 ORF was custom-synthesized with BamHI and SbfI at the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively (Genscript Biotech Corporation, NJ). The BamHI-NCH1-SbfI construct was sub-cloned by restriction cloning into an ECGFP donor vector containing eGFP-FLAG-HA (Gumber et al., 2019a, JCB), to create the eGFP-FLAG-HA-NCH1 entry vector, named NCH1ec. Similarly, the BamHI-NCH2-PstI construct was custom synthesized and sub-cloned into an ECGFP donor vector to create the eGFP-FLAG-HA-NCH2 entry vector, named NCH2ec. For construction of the mKAKU41vector, BamHI-mCherry-FLAG-HA-MKAKU41-BamH1 was synthesized by Genscript and cloned in pUC18 at the BamHI restriction site. From this cloning vector, the mCherry-FLAG-HA-MKAKU41 gene construct was amplified using KAKUattF (5′-GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCATGGTTA GCAAGGGAGAAGAGG-3′) and KAKUattR (5′-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTCACGTAG CCCGTCCCCGT-3′) primers and inserted into pDONR221 vector by BP cloning (Invitrogen), to generate the MKAKU41 entry clone, named MKAKU41ec. For the generation of plant expression vectors, the fluorescent fusion protein constructs from these three entry clones were then transferred individually to the destination vector pH7WG2 (Karimi et al., 2002) by Gate LR recombination (Invitrogen).

For production of the p35S:SP-mCherry-GFP-HDEL positive control for apFRET, mCherry was PCR amplified with Q5 polymerase (NEB) using primers JM403 (5′-GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTACAATGAAA GCCTTCACACTCGCTCTCTTCTTAGCTCTTTCCCTCTATC TCCTGCCCAATCCAGCCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAG G-3′) and JM404 (5′-acctccactgccaccCTTGTACAGCTCGTCC ATGCCG-3′). The primers included both the Gateway cloning attB1 site and secretion signal at the 5′ end, and a 15nt overhang for Gibson assembly at the 3′ end, which contained a GGSGG amino acid linker between mCherry and GFP upon fusion. GFP was amplified using primers JM367 (5′GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTGtcataattcat catGCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCCGAGAG-3′) and JM405 (5′GTACAAGggtggcagtggaggtATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGA GC-3′) which contained the GGSGG linker at the 5′ end, and the HDEL ER retention motif, an attB2 site, and a stop codon at the 3′ end. These two products were fused together using the NEB HIFI Gibson assembly enzyme mix and incubated at 50°C for 1 h. A Gateway BP reaction into pDONR221 and subsequent LR reaction into pB7FWG2 was then performed to produce the final vector. All steps confirmed by colony PCR and sequencing.

Agrobacterium Transformation

Constructs were transformed into A. tumefaciens GV3101. Transformation was performed by incubating plasmid DNA and chemically competent agrobacterium on ice for 30 min, followed by 5 min cold shock in liquid nitrogen, then 5 min heat shock at 37°C in a rotating incubator. After heat shock, 200 μL LB media was added and cells incubated at 28°C for 2 h. Cells were then plated in LB plates containing Spectinomycin (50 μg/mL), Gentamycin (10 μg/mL) and Rifampicin (25 μg/mL) and incubated for 2 days at 28°C. Individual colonies were then picked, grown O/N and transformed into N. benthamiana.

Plant Growth Conditions

Nicotiana benthamiana plants were grown in 16:8 h light:dark cycle in a greenhouse maintained at 21°C. Infiltrated plants were 5–6 weeks old.

Live Cell Imaging

Fluorescently tagged proteins of interest were transiently transformed into N. benthamiana as described previously (Sparkes et al., 2006). Protein expression constructs first reported here are p35S:NCH1-GFP, p35S:NCH2-GFP and p35S:MKAKU41-mCherry. All other markers have been previously published: p35S:GFP-CNX (Irons et al., 2003), p35S:LBR-GFP (Irons et al., 2003), p35S:MLKP1-GFP (Gumber et al., 2019a), p35S:YFP-AtSUN2 (Graumann et al., 2010), p35S:YFP-AtSUN2ΔNterm (Graumann et al., 2010), p35S:MLKS2-GFP and p35S:MLKS2ΔARM-GFP (Gumber et al., 2019b). An agrobacterium culture of OD 0.1 was used in all conditions unless otherwise stated and cells were imaged 3 days after transformation. The GFP/mCherry combinations were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope with line switching, 488 nm and 561 nm excitation, and 500–550 nm and 565–620 nm emissions, collected for GFP and mCherry respectively. For GFP/YFP and YFP/mCherry imaging, a Zeiss LSM 880 was used with frame switching. For GFP/YFP imaging, 488 and 514 nm excitation was used with emission collected between 500–550 and 525–560 for GFP and YFP respectively. For YFP/mCherry imaging, 514 and 561 nm excitation was used, and emission collected between 517–560 nm and 561–624 nm respectively. An image size of 512 × 512 pixels with a scan zoom of 4 and a 63 × 1.4NA lens was used for all imaging described above. All combinations were performed with three independent experimental repeats; representative images are shown. For Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) a 100 × 1.4NA lens was used with a 4 μm ROI in the center of the image, encompassing the nucleus. Five scans were taken pre-bleach and then the 488 nm laser bleached the ROI by using 100% transmission for 20 iterations. Recovery Images were then collected for 1 min to monitor recovery. Data was normalized and FRAP curves produced as described previously (Martiniere et al., 2012).

For acceptor photobleaching förster resonance energy transfer (apFRET) a 100 × 1.4NA lens was used with a 4 μm ROI in the center of the image, encompassing the nucleus. Five scans were performed with both GFP and mCherry emission/excitation, and then the mCherry construct was bleached in the ROI by the 561 nm laser at 100% transmission for 20 iterations. Following this, five post-bleach scans were taken. Data was normalized and apFRET efficiency (%) calculated as previously (Graumann et al., 2010; Graumann, 2014; Pawar et al., 2016). A minimum of 30 nuclei per condition were used for apFRET across three experimental repeats. A one-way ANOVA was performed to determine statistically significant differences between samples. For Latrunculin-B (LatB) treatment for depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton, samples were incubated with 25 μM LatB for 1 h, as this has previously been shown to depolymerize the actin cytoskeleton sufficiently (McKenna et al., 2019). Graphs were generated with graphpad as described in the figure legends. Statistical tests were performed in Graphpad Prism and are either ANOVA or Students T-test depending on the suitability to the dataset and as specified in the figure legends. For all data sets, ns p ≥ 0.05, p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, p ≤ 0.001 and ∗∗p ≤ 0.0001.

Maize Plant Material and Genotyping

The wild-type W22 used in this study is a color-converted W22 line obtained from Hugo Dooner (Waksman Inst., Rutgers, NJ, United States) derived by Brink (1956). The UF-Mu-00395 seed stock was obtained from the Maize Genetics Cooperation Stock Center1. The plants were grown at the Florida State University Mission Road Research Facility (Tallahassee, FL, United States) during summer 2017 and 2018, and propagated by out- crossing to W22. In the fall of 2018, the progeny seeds were grown in the greenhouse in the King Life Sciences Building (Biological Science Dept, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States). The segregating plants were self-crossed to obtain mutant plants from among the progeny.

DNA was isolated from 4-week old seedlings as described previously in Gumber et al. (2019b). PCR genotyping was carried out using a combination of gene-specific forward (F, 5′-CCCGTGAAGCCGAAGGCAGA-3′) and reverse (R, 5′-CGCCTCACGCTCACGCTCAC-3′) primers, or transposon-specific Tir6 primer (5′-AGAGAAGCCAACGCCAWCGCCTCYATTTCGTC-3′) in combination with F or R primer. The PCR products were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis and cloned in pCRTM4Blunt-TOPO Vector (Invitrogen cat # K2875-20) by TA cloning. The clones were sequenced and the insert sequences were verified using M13F and M13R vector primers at the Molecular Cloning Facility, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida State University. The sequences were aligned with the W22v2 reference genome to validate the transposon insertion site.

Microscopy in Maize

Maize root hair imaging was carried out as described in Gumber et al. (2019b). Briefly, roots were harvested from 5-day old seedlings and fixed for 1 h in Buffer A (Howe et al., 2013) supplemented with 4% paraformaldehyde. Small sections of root tissue containing root hair were stained with 3 μg/mL DAPI for 20 min at room temperature, mounted with VECTASHIELD, and imaged on an EVOS fluorescence microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The images were processed using the Analyze Particle function of ImageJ to measure the longest diameter and circularity of the nuclei.

For stomatal complex imaging, plants were grown in the greenhouse and the 4th leaf was harvested at its first appearance. The harvested leaf was fixed in Buffer A with 4% paraformaldehyde for an hour at room temperature with rotation. The tissue was rinsed thrice with and stored in Buffer A at 4C, until further use. The leaf tissue was placed on a glass slide, chopped into small pieces and stained with 3 μg/mL DAPI for 20 min at room temperature, mounted with VECTASHIELD, and imaged on an EVOS fluorescence microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Pollen grain staining was carried out as previously described in Gumber et al. (2019b). Briefly, male flowers were harvested before dehiscence and fixed in Carnoy’s fixative (6 alcohol:3 chloroform:1 acetic acid) for a minimum of 2 h at room temperature. Anthers were extruded from flowers with the help of a micro scalpel and forceps on a glass slide. Staining was carried out with modified Alexander’s stain containing Malachite green (0.01%), Acid Fuchsin (0.05%) and Orange G (0.005%) as described to differentiate viable (magenta) pollen grains from aborted (green) pollen grains. Bright field images of the pollen grains were collected on Revolve microscope (Echo Labs). At least 300 pollen grains each from 3 plants of every genotype were counted to calculate pollen viability. Pollen roundness was carried out using Fiji.

RNA Isolation and Library Preparation

Segregating wildtype and mutant mkaku41 plants were grown in the greenhouse. From 2 week-old plants, fourth leaves were harvested and from 6 to 8 week old plants, mid-prophase meiotic-staged male flowers were harvested. The tissues were immediately stored in liquid nitrogen. RNA was isolated from three biological replicates for each genotype using Qiagen RNeasy Plant mini kit per manufacturer’s instructions. Integrity of the RNA was tested using the Bioanalyzer (Agilent) system. For library preparation, sample input was 400 ng total RNA (determined by Qubit RNA HS reagents, Thermo) with RIN > 7 (Bioanalyzer RNA Nano, Agilent). Libraries were prepared with the Biomek 400 Automated Workstation (Beckman Coulter), using the NEBNEXT Ultra II RNA Library Prep kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs) according to manufacturer’s instructions, with an RNA fragmentation time of 15 min, a 1/10th dilution of NEB adaptor and 11 cycles of PCR amplification with dual-indexing primers. Amplified libraries were initially quantified by Qubit DNA HS reagents, checked for size and artifacts using Bioanalyzer DNA HS reagents, and KAPA qPCR (KAPA Biosystems) was used to determine molar quantities of each library. Individual libraries were diluted and pooled equimolar, and the pool was again checked by Bioanalyzer and KAPA qPCR before submission for sequencing.

RNA Sequencing and Data Analysis

RNA-seq libraries were sequenced on a Novaseq 6000 at the Translational Science Lab, College of Medicine, Florida State University. Approximately 40 million single-end 100 base reads were obtained for each biological replicate in this experiment and are available from NCBI sequence read archive project, accession number PRJNA675860. Contaminating 3′ adapter sequences were trimmed from the demultiplexed raw reads using cutadapt version 1.16. Raw and trimmed reads were subjected to quality control testing with fastqc. Trimmed reads were aligned to the W22 genome assembly “Zm-W22-REFERENCE-NRGENE-2.0” using the splice-aware aligner hisat2. Briefly, Hisat2 indices were constructed from known exons, and splice sites extracted from the W22 genome annotation (Zm00004b) and the reference genome assembly (Zm-W22-REFERENCE-NRGENE-2.0.fasta). Trimmed reads were then aligned to the resulting splice-aware hisat2 index using the following optional arguments: –rna-strandness R, –dta-cufflinks, –summary-file. Predicted novel transcripts were assembled and merged across replicates and samples using stringtie2 in “conservative” mode. Per-transcript coverage tables were prepared by stringtie2 in “ballgown” format. Resulting coverage tables were converted into count tables suitable for differential expression analysis by DEseq2 in R using the tximport package. Differential expression analysis was performed separately for each tissue group, i.e (leaf mutant vs. WT and tassel mutant vs. WT). Briefly, genes with fewer than 10 counts across all replicates were discarded and DEseq2 results were generated for both tissue groups such that log2(fold-change) estimates were reported for (mutant/WT) ratios. Statistically significant differentially expressed (adjusted p-value < 0.05) genes were subsequently extracted from each of the resulting DEseq2 tables for further analysis (Supplementary Table 2).

Data Availability Statement

The original sequence data used in this study are publicly available from NCBI accession PRJNA675860.

Author Contributions

The expression plasmids made by HG and HB and used by JM and KG for cytological analysis. The tobacco transient expression microscopy data was produced and images collected by JM with image analysis by JM and KG. The maize mutant analysis, PCR genotyping, all cloning, and RNA isolation was done by HG, the maize phenotyping was done by AJ, AK, HG, and HB. The transcriptome analysis and SRA curation were done by ZT and HB. The experiments were designed, interpreted, and written about by JM, HG, ZT, KG, and HB. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.


This work was performed as part of the Cost action # CA16212 ‘INDEPTH’ whose members are appreciated for their fruitful discussions. This work was supported in part by a grant to HB from the National Science Foundation (NSF IOS 1444532).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We would like to acknowledge the Bioimaging unit at Oxford Brookes for access to the confocal microscopes.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:

Supplementary Figure 1 | The Maize NCH1 and NCH2 proteins co-localize with their Arabidopsis homolog CRWN1. (A) Confocal live cell imaging of cells co-expressing either NCH1 or NCH2 with Arabidopsis CRWN1 shows colocalization. (B) Plot of raw FRAP intensity values over time for two representative FRAP experiments: one for NCH1 (black) and one for NCH2 (red). (C) Normalized intensity data plotted for all NCH1 FRAP curves. Blue points show individual data points, black lines show FRAP curve fits for each nucleus, and red lines show global FRAP curves produced from all datasets (As shown in Figure 1). (D) Same as panel C except for NCH2. (E) Box plots of FRAP recovery plateau values for NCH1 and NCH2. (F) Box plots of FRAP recovery half-time values for NCH1 and NCH2. For panels E and F, the individual data points from single FRAP recovery curves (black dots), the mean (red line), standard deviations (blue lines), and statistical significance (asterisks) are indicated. Students T-test performed in E and F, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗p ≤ 0.0001. Mean and standard deviation values are tabulated below the plots. n ≥ 30 nuclei imaged across three experimental repeats.

Supplementary Figure 2 | Description of Sub-periphery/whole nuclei fluorescence ratio measurement. Diagram describing how the sub-periphery over whole nuclei measurement was determined using image J. Two regions of interest (ROIs) were generated, one encompassing the whole nuclei and one only sub-periphery nuclear fluorescence (yellow ROIs with hashed boundaries). The sub-periphery fluorescence value was then divided by the whole nuclei fluorescence value in order to obtain the ratio. If the majority of fluorescence is located at the periphery/nuclear envelope, this would result in a low ratio, conversely if most fluorescence was internal, this would result in a higher ratio.

Supplementary Figure 3 | Multiple Seq Alignment of Transcripts. (A) The 5’ UTR region and a small portion of the CDS are diagrammed as shown in Figure 5, and reversed (bottom configuration) as aligned in the multiple sequence alignment. (B) The multiple sequence alignment displays all of the RNA-seq reads with a perfect match to the 25 bp query sequence (yellow) using grep of the fastq files. All matches were converted to FASTA sequences for multiple sequence alignment. The reference genome sequence is shown at top for comparison. The sequence identifiers start with single characters for tissue (”L” for leaf; “T” for tassel), genotype (”1” for wildtype, “2” for mkaku41 homozygous mutant), or bioreplicate (”A,” “B,” or “C” for bioreplicate 1, 2, or 3, respectively), followed by unique identifier from Illumina sequence read name. The strandedness is indicated relative to the gene model, with all antisense RNAs indicated (ANTISENSE, red text).

Supplementary Table 1 | Values for apFRET efficiency with Internal controls and multiple comparisons of all treatments. (A) All apFRET efficiency% values for data presented in Figure 3C including internal control values. (B) Tukey multiple comparison one way Anova dataset from all apFRET data presented, including that presented in Figure 3C.

Supplementary Table 2 | Differentially expressed genes between mkaku41 mutant versus wildtype plants for maize leaf and tassel.

Supplementary Table 3 | Plasmid information and Addgene IDs.


  1. ^


Agrawal, A., and Lele, T. P. (2019). Mechanics of nuclear membranes. J. Cell Sci. 132:jcs229245. doi: 10.1242/jcs.229245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alam, S. G., Zhang, Q., Prasad, N., Li, Y., Chamala, S., Kuchibhotls, L., et al. (2016). The mammalian LINC complex regulates genome transcriptional responses to substrate rigidity. Sci. Rep. 6: 38063.

Google Scholar

Bouzid, T., Kim, E., Riehl, B. D., Esfahani, A. M., Rosenbohm, J., Yang, R., et al. (2019). The LINC complex, mechanotransduction, and mesenchymal stem cell function and fate. J. Biol. Eng. 13:68.

Google Scholar

Brink, R. A. (1956). A genetic change associated with the R locus in maize which is directed and potentially reversible. Genetics 41, 872–889. doi: 10.1093/genetics/41.6.872

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, W., Worman, H. J., and Gundersen, G. G. (2015). Accessorizing and anchoring the LINC complex for multifunctionality. J. Cell Biol. 208, 11–22. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201409047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, J., Strickler, S. R., and Richards, E. J. (2019). Loss of CRWN nuclear proteins induces cell death and salicylic acid defense signaling. Plant Physiol. 179, 1315–1329. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ciska, M., and Moreno Dí-az de la Espina, S. (2014). The intriguing plant nuclear lamina. Front. Plant Sci. 5:166.

Google Scholar

Ciska, M., Hikida, R., Masuda, K., and Moreno Díaz de la Espina, S. (2019). Evolutionary history and structure of nuclear matrix constituent proteins, the plant analogues of lamins. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 2651–2664. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collings, D. A., Carter, C. N., Rink, J. C., Scott, A. C., Wyatt, S. E., Allen, N. S., et al. (2000). Plant nuclei can contain extensive grooves and invaginations. Plant Cell 12, 2425–2440. doi: 10.2307/3871239

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crisp, M., Liu, Q., Roux, K., Rattner, J. B., Shanahan, C., Burke, B., et al. (2006). Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J. Cell Biol. 172, 41–53. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200509124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Magistris, P., and Antonin, W. (2018). The dynamic nature of the nuclear envelope. Curr. Biol. 28, R487–R497.

Google Scholar

Dittmer, T. A., Stacey, N. J., Sugimoto-Shirasu, K., and Richards, E. J. (2007). Little nuclei genes affecting nuclear morphology in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 19, 2793–2803. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.053231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Enyedi, B., and Niethammer, P. (2017). Nuclear membrane stretch and its role in mechanotransduction. Nucleus 8, 156–161. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2016.1263411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Evans, D. E., and Graumann, K. (2018). The Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton Complex In Higher Plants. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Google Scholar

Gerbino, A., Procino, G., Svelto, M., and Carmosino, M. (2018). Role of lamin A/C gene mutations in the signaling defects leading to cardiomyopathies. Front. Physiol. 9:1356.

Google Scholar

Goto, C., Tamura, K., Fukao, Y., Shimada, T., and Hara-Nishimura, I. (2014). The novel nuclear envelope protein KAKU4 modulates nuclear morphology in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26, 2143–2155. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.122168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goto, C., Tamura, K., Nishimaki, S., Maruyama, D., and Hara-Nishimura, I. (2020). The nuclear envelope protein KAKU4 determines the migration order of the vegetative nucleus and sperm cells in pollen tubes. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 6273–6281. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Graumann, K. (2014). Evidence for LINC1-SUN Associations at the plant nuclear periphery. PLoS One 9:e93406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Graumann, K., and Evans, D. E. (2017). “The nuclear envelope - structure and protein interactions,” in Annual Plant Reviews Online, ed. J. A. Roberts, (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd), 19–56. doi: 10.1002/9781118472507.ch2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Graumann, K., Runions, J., and Evans, D. E. (2010). Characterization of SUN-domain proteins at the higher plant nuclear envelope. Plant J. 61, 134–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04038.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grob, S., Schmid, M. W., and Grossniklaus, U. (2014). Hi-C analysis in arabidopsis identifies the KNOT, a structure with similarities to the flamenco locus of drosophila. Mol. Cell 55, 678–693. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.07.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gumber, H. K., McKenna, J. F., Estrada, A. L., Jalovec, A. M., Kartick, A. C., and Graumann, K. (2019a). Identification and characterization of genes encoding the nuclear envelope LINC complex in the monocot species Zea mays. J. Cell Sci. 132:jcs221390. doi: 10.1242/jcs.221390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gumber, H. K., McKenna, J. F., Tolmie, A. F., Jalovec, A. M., Kartick, A. C., and Graumann, K. (2019b). MLKS2 is an ARM domain and F-actin-associated KASH protein that functions in stomatal complex development and meiotic chromosome segregation. Nucleus 10, 144–166. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2019.1629795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, T., Mao, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Fu, M., and Sun, Z. (2017). Lamin-like proteins negatively regulate plant immunity through NAC with transmembrane motif1-like9 and nonexpressor of PR genes1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 10, 1334–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hagan, I., and Yanagida, M. (1995). The product of the spindle formation gene sadl+associates with the fission yeast spindle pole body and is essential for viability. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1033–1047. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.4.1033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haque, F., Lloyd, D. J., Smallwood, D. T., Dent, C. L., Shanahan, C. M., and Fry, A. M. (2006). SUN1 interacts with nuclear lamin a and cytoplasmic nesprins to provide a physical connection between the nuclear lamina and the cytoskeleton. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 3738–3751. doi: 10.1128/mcb.26.10.3738-3751.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hetzer, M. W. (2010). The nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a000539–a000539.

Google Scholar

Hieda, M. (2019). Signal Transduction across the nuclear envelope: role of the LINC complex in bidirectional signaling. Cells 8:124. doi: 10.3390/cells8020124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Howe, E. S., Murphy, S. P., and Bass, H. W. (2013). “Three-dimensional acrylamide fluorescence in situ hybridization for plant cells,” in Plant Meiosis: Methods and Protocols, eds W. P. Pawlowski, M. Grelon, and S. Armstrong, (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), 53–66. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-333-6_6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, B., Wang, N., Bi, X., Karaaslan, E. S., Weber, A. L., and Zhu, W. (2019). Plant lamin-like proteins mediate chromatin tethering at the nuclear periphery. Genome Biol. 20:87.

Google Scholar

Irons, S. L., Evans, D. E., and Brandizzi, F. (2003). The first 238 amino acids of the human lamin B receptor are targeted to the nuclear envelope in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 943–950. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Janin, A., Bauer, D., Ratti, F., Millat, G., and Mejat, A. (2017). Nuclear envelopathies: a complex LINC between nuclear envelope and pathology. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 12:147.

Google Scholar

Jorgens, D. M., Inman, J. L., Wojcik, M., Robertson, C., Palsdottir, H., and Tsai, W. T. (2017). Deep nuclear invaginations are linked to cytoskeletal filaments – integrated bioimaging of epithelial cells in 3D culture. J. Cell Sci. 130, 177–189. doi: 10.1242/jcs.190967

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karimi, M., Inzé, D., and Depicker, A. (2002). Gatewaytm vectors for agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 193–195. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02251-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, D. I., Kc, B., and Roux, K. J. (2015). Making the linc: sun and kash protein interactions. Biol. Chem. 396, 295–310. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2014-0267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lammerding, J., Schulze, P. C., Takahashi, T., Kozlov, S., Sullivan, T., and Kamm, R. D. (2004). Lamin A/C deficiency causes defective nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 370–378. doi: 10.1172/jci200419670

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Legartová, S., Stixová, L., Laur, O., Kozubek, S., Sehnalova, P., and Bartova, E. (2014). Nuclear structures surrounding internal lamin invaginations: morphology of internal lamins. J. Cell. Biochem. 115, 476–487. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24681

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leppek, K., Das, R., and Barna, M. (2018). Functional 5’ UTR mRNA structures in eukaryotic translation regulation and how to find them. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 158–174. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luxton, G. G., and Starr, D. A. (2014). KASHing up with the nucleus: novel functional roles of KASH proteins at the cytoplasmic surface of the nucleus. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 28, 69–75. doi: 10.1016/

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malone, C. J., Fixsen, W. D., Horvitz, H. R., and Han, M. (1999). UNC-84 localizes to the nuclear envelope and is required for nuclear migration and anchoring during C. elegans development. Dev. Camb. Engl. 126, 3171–3181.

Google Scholar

Martiniere, A., Lavagi, I., Nageswaran, G., Rolfe, D. J., Maneta-Peyret, L., and Luu, D. T. (2012). Cell wall constrains lateral diffusion of plant plasma-membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 12805–12810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202040109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Masuda, K., Xu, Z. J., Takahashi, S., Ono, M., Nomura, K., and Inoue, M. (1997). Peripheral framework of carrot cell nucleus contains a novel protein predicted to exhibit a long alpha-helical domain. Exp. Cell Res. 232, 173–181. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3531

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCarty, D. R., and Meeley, R. B. (2009). “Transposon resources for forward and reverse genetics in maize,” in Handbook of Maize, eds J. L. Bennetzen and S. Hake, (New York, NY: Springer), 561–584. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-77863-1_28

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McKenna, J. F., Rolfe, D. J., Webb, S. E. D., Tolmie, A. F., Botchway, S. W., and Martin-Fernandez, M. L. (2019). The cell wall regulates dynamics and size of plasma-membrane nanodomains in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 12857–12862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1819077116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meier, I., Richards, E. J., and Evans, D. E. (2017). Cell biology of the plant nucleus. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 139–172. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murphy, S. P., Simmons, C. R., and Bass, H. W. (2010). Structure and expression of the maize (Zea mays L.). SUN-domain protein gene family: evidence for the existence of two divergent classes of SUN proteins in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 10:269. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-269

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Newman-Griffis, A. H., del Cerro, P., Charpentier, M., and Meier, I. (2019). Medicago LINC complexes function in nuclear morphology, nuclear movement, and root nodule symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 179, 491–506. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pawar, V., Poulet, A., Détourné, G., Tatout, C., Vanrobays, E., and Evans, D. E. (2016). A novel family of plant nuclear envelope-associated proteins. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 5699–5710.

Google Scholar

Pradillo, M., Evans, D., and Graumann, K. (2019). The nuclear envelope in higher plant mitosis and meiosis. Nucleus 10, 55–66. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2019.1587277

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rothballer, A., and Kutay, U. (2013). The diverse functional LINCs of the nuclear envelope to the cytoskeleton and chromatin. Chromosoma 122, 415–429. doi: 10.1007/s00412-013-0417-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Y. (2020). Nuclear lamina CRWN proteins regulate chromatin organization, gene expression, and nuclear body formation in plants. J. Plant Res. 133, 457–462. doi: 10.1007/s10265-020-01184-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schermelleh, L., Carlton, P. M., Haase, S., Shao, L., Winoto, L., and Kner, P. (2008). Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science 320, 1332–1336. doi: 10.1126/science.1156947

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schreiber, K. H., and Kennedy, B. K. (2013). When lamins go bad: nuclear structure and disease. Cell 152, 1365–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sparkes, I. A., Runions, J., Kearns, A., and Hawes, C. (2006). Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2019–2025. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Starr, D. A. (2002). Role of ANC-1 in tethering nuclei to the actin cytoskeleton. Science 298, 406–409. doi: 10.1126/science.1075119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Starr, D. A. (2019). A network of nuclear envelope proteins and cytoskeletal force generators mediates movements of and within nuclei throughout Caenorhabditis elegans development. Exp. Biol. Med. 244, 1323–1332. doi: 10.1177/1535370219871965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Starr, D. A., and Fridolfsson, H. N. (2010). Interactions between nuclei and the cytoskeleton are mediated by SUN-KASH nuclear-envelope bridges. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 421–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swift, J., Ivanovska, I. L., Buxboim, A., Harada, T., Dingal, P. C., and Pinter, J. (2013). Nuclear lamin-a scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341, 1240104–1240104. doi: 10.1126/science.1240104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamura, K., Goto, C., and Hara-Nishimura, I. (2015). Recent advances in understanding plant nuclear envelope proteins involved in nuclear morphology. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 1641–1647. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamura, K., Iwabuchi, K., Fukao, Y., Kondo, M., Okamoto, K., and Ueda, H. (2013). Myosin XI-i links the nuclear membrane to the cytoskeleton to control nuclear movement and shape in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 23, 1776–1781. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Dittmer, T. A., and Richards, E. J. (2013). Arabidopsis crowded nuclei (crwn). proteins are required for nuclear size control and heterochromatin organization. BMC Plant Biol. 13:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Zhao, M., McCarty, D. R., and Lisch, D. (2020). Transposable elements employ distinct integration strategies with respect to transcriptional landscapes in eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 6685–6698. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa370

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, W., Guan, C., Feng, J., Liang, Y., Zhan, N., and Zuo, J. (2016). The Arabidopsis crowded nuclei genes regulate seed germination by modulating degradation of ABI5 protein: CRWNs regulate seed germination. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 58, 669–678. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Graumann, K., Wirthmueller, L., Jones, J. D., and Meier, I. (2014). Identification of unique SUN-interacting nuclear envelope proteins with diverse functions in plants. J. Cell Biol. 205, 677–692. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201401138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: nuclear envelope, maize, lamin, nucleoskeleton, KAKU4, nucleus, peripheral nucleoplasm

Citation: McKenna JF, Gumber HK, Turpin ZM, Jalovec AM, Kartick AC, Graumann K and Bass HW (2021) Maize (Zea mays L.) Nucleoskeletal Proteins Regulate Nuclear Envelope Remodeling and Function in Stomatal Complex Development and Pollen Viability. Front. Plant Sci. 12:645218. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.645218

Received: 22 December 2020; Accepted: 27 January 2021;
Published: 17 February 2021.

Edited by:

Christopher J. Staiger, Purdue University, United States

Reviewed by:

Motoki Tominaga, Waseda University, Japan
Viktor Zarsky, Charles University, Czechia

Copyright © 2021 McKenna, Gumber, Turpin, Jalovec, Kartick, Graumann and Bass. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Katja Graumann,; Hank W. Bass,

ORCID: Joseph F. McKenna,; Hardeep K. Gumber,; Hank W. Bass,

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.