Abstract
While fungal biotrophs are dependent on successfully suppressing/subverting host defenses during their interaction with live cells, necrotrophs, due to their lifestyle are often confronted with a suite of toxic metabolites. These include an assortment of plant defense compounds (PDCs) which can demonstrate broad antifungal activity. These PDCs can be either constitutively present in plant tissue or induced in response to infection, but are nevertheless an important obstacle which needs to be overcome for successful pathogenesis. Fungal necrotrophs have developed a number of strategies to achieve this goal, from the direct detoxification of these compounds through enzymatic catalysis and modification, to the active transport of various PDCs to achieve toxin sequestration and efflux. Studies have shown across multiple pathogens that the efficient detoxification of host PDCs is both critical for successful infection and often a determinant factor in pathogen host range. Here, we provide a broad and comparative overview of the various mechanisms for PDC detoxification which have been identified in both fungal necrotrophs and fungal pathogens which depend on detoxification during a necrotrophic phase of infection. Furthermore, the effect that these mechanisms have on fungal host range, metabolism, and disease control will be discussed.
Introduction
To successfully infect and colonize a host, phytopathogenic fungi must overcome a repertoire of plant defense compounds (PDCs) with broad antimicrobial properties. PDCs are often sub-classified as those which are induced in response to infection (phytoalexins) and/or those that exist as pre-formed antimicrobial compounds in plant tissue (phytoanticipins). These classifications are not mutually exclusive, as compounds may exist as both a phytoalexin and phytoanticipin within a single plant (Van Etten et al., 1994). The lifestyle of a pathogen can play a major role in how they interact with these compounds, as phytoalexin production is often dependent on the successful induction of plant defenses and phytoanticipin activity requires damage to plant tissue (Tiku, 2020). In the case of biotrophic pathogens that depend on the colonization of living tissue, it has been suggested that the maintenance of plant cellular integrity may prevent the release of phytoanticipins, thus subverting their role in plant defense (). Additionally, pathogens with greater host-specialization, as is seen in nearly all biotrophs, tend to present greater basal tolerance for co-evolved host antimicrobials and may be less dependent on specific detoxification mechanisms (; ). This may be why active detoxification of host PDCs by fungal biotrophs has only been noted in rare circumstances (Okmen et al., 2013).
Contrarily, necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungi, which induce cell death and compromise the integrity of plant tissues during colonization, do not benefit from this covertness and must actively detoxify host antimicrobials. This detoxification is facilitated by a number of mechanisms including metabolization of the compounds to less toxic derivatives and transporter-mediated efflux to maintain PDCs at sublethal thresholds. This review will serve to summarize the current state of knowledge surrounding the detoxification of plant PDCs during fungal necrotrophy and the implications this detoxification has on pathogen evolution, host range, and management.
Enzymatic Detoxification of Inducible PDCs
Inducible PDCs are defined in this review as low molecular weight antimicrobial compounds that can be produced/accumulated in response to pathogen invasion. This category includes all compounds classified as phytoalexins (i.e., induced in response to infection) and those which are both phytoalexins and phytoanticipins (i.e., compounds which exist in healthy plant tissue and additionally accumulate in response to infection). Examples of such compounds include the antimicrobials resveratrol and maackiain (Van Etten et al., 1994; Wang et al., 2013). While these compounds are often broadly mycotoxic, it has been observed for decades that pathogens of specific plants appear more tolerant of their PDC repertoire than non-pathogens (). This tolerance is a necessary trait of a pathogen that seeks to fully colonize host tissue and, in many cases, appears to result from its capacity to actively metabolize (detoxify) specific PDCs into less toxic derivatives (Table 1). Similar to the production of phytoalexins by the plant, this detoxification is typically inducible through fungal exposure to mycotoxic compounds or in response to specific cues (; Pedras et al., 2004; Pedras et al., 2007; ). This stepwise induction follows: (1) pathogen recognition by the plant, (2) production and accumulation of PDCs at and around the site of infection, (3) recognition of PDCs by the pathogen, (4) production of detoxification enzymes. Some PDCs are not only antimicrobial themselves, but act as intermediates in the biosynthesis of other, often more mycotoxic compounds (Pedras et al., 2008; ). Because of this, the metabolism of such compounds, including resveratrol and brassinin (discussed below), can serve to both actively protect the fungus and disrupt the production of other bioactive compounds. The following section discusses the enzymatic detoxification of inducible PDCs that have been observed or characterized in fungal necrotrophic/hemibiotrophic pathogens of plants.
TABLE 1
| Class | Compound | Fungal species | Conversion product | GEC | Citation |
| Pterocarpans | Pisatin | N. haematococca | (+)-6a-Hydroxymaackiain | + | |
| Stemphylium botryosum | (+)-6a-Hydroxymaackiain | − | |||
| F.oxysporum f. sp.pisi | 6a-Hydroxy-inerminisoflavan | + | |||
| Maackiain | S.botryosum | Dihydromaackiain | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |
| F. solani | la-Hydroxymaackiain 6a-Hydroxymaackiain | + + | |||
| S. trifoliorum | 6a-Hydroxymaackiain | − | Macfoy and Smith, 1979 | ||
| B. cinerea | 6a-Hydroxymaackiain | − | Macfoy and Smith, 1979 | ||
| Medicarpin | F. solani | la-Hydroxymaackiain 6a-Hydroxymedicarpin | + + | ||
| F. proliferatum | 3,9-Dihydroxypterocarpan | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| S. botryosum | Vestitone | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| S. trifoliorum | Vestitol | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| B. cinerea | 6a-Hydroxy derivative | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| Colletotrichum lindemuthianum | 6a-Hydroxy derivative | − | |||
| Colletotrichum coffeanum | 6a-Hydroxy derivative | − | |||
| Ascochytarabiei | Multiple pterocarpan derivatives | − | |||
| Phaseollidin | F. solani | Phaseollidin hydrate | + | Turbek et al., 1992 | |
| Phaseollin | S.botryosum | Phaseollinisoflavan | − | ||
| C.lindemuthianum | 6a-Hydroxyphaseollin 6a7-Dihydroxyphaseollin | − − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| F. solani f. sp. phaseoli | 1a-Hydroxy phaseollone | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| Phaeosphaeria nodorum | cis and trans 12,13-dihydrodihydroxyphaseollin. | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| Isoflavones | Kievitone | F. solani | Kievitone hydrate | + | |
| 2,3-Dehydrokievitone | Aspergillus flavus | Dihydrofurano-isoflavone Dihydropyrano-isoflavone 2,3-Dehydrokievitone glycol | − − − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |
| B. cinerea | Dihydrofurano-isoflavone Dihydropyrano-isoflavone 2,3-Dehydrokievitone glycol | − − − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| Formononetin | F. avenaceum | Calycosin | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |
| Biochanin A | F.oxysporum f. sp.lini (and lycopersici) | Pratensein | − | Weltring et al., 1982 | |
| Daidzein | Aspergillussaitoi | 8-Hydroxydaidzein | − | ||
| Genistein | A. saitoi | 8-Hydroxygenistein | − | ||
| Armillaria mellea | 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic 1,3,5-Trihydroxybenzene | − − | |||
| Other flavonoidsand stilbenoids | Resveratrol | B. cinerea | Resveratrol trans-dehydrodimer | + | Schouten et al., 2002 |
| Quercetin | S. sclerotiorum | 2-PCPGCA | + | ||
| P. olsonii | Unknown product | + | Tranchimand et al., 2008 | ||
| Verticillium dahliae | 2-PCPGCA | + | |||
| Kaempferol | P. olsonii | Unknown product | + | Tranchimand et al., 2008 | |
| S. sclerotiorum | 2,4-Dihydroxy-6-[(4-hydroxybenzoyl)oxy] benzoic acid | + | |||
| Galangin | P. olsonii | Unknown product | + | Tranchimand et al., 2008 | |
| Fisetin | P. olsonii | Unknown product | + | Tranchimand et al., 2008 | |
| Rutin | V. dahliae | Quercetin | − | ||
| flavus | Protocatechuic acid 2-PCPGCA Rutinose | − | Westlake et al., 1961 | ||
| Sakuranetin | Rhizoctonia solani | Sakuranetin-4’-O-β-D-xylopyranoside Naringenin-7-O-β-D-xylopyranoside | − − | ||
| M. oryzae | Naringen Sternbin | − | |||
| Astringin | Endoconidiophora polonica | Muconoid-typederivatives | + | Wadke et al., 2016 | |
| Catechin | E.polonica | Muconoid-type derivatives | + | Wadke et al., 2016 | |
| Indoles | Brassinin | Leptosphaeria maculans | 3-Indolecarboxaldehyde 3-Indolecarboxylic acid Indolyl-3-methanamine | + + + | Pedras et al., 2008 Pedras et al., 2007 Pedras et al., 2007 |
| Alternaria brassicicola | Indolyl-3-methanamine | + | Pedras et al., 2009 | ||
| S. sclerotiorum | 1-b-D-glucopyranosyl (b-D-glc) brassinin | + | Sexton et al., 2009 | ||
| 1-Methoxybrassinin | S. sclerotiorum | Spirothiazolidinone Spirothiazolidinethione | − − | Pedras and Hossain, 2006 Pedras and Hossain, 2006 | |
| 7-(b-D-glc)-1- methoxybrassinin | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |||
| Cyclobrassinin | S. sclerotiorum | 1-(b-D-glc) cyclobrassinin | − | Pedras and Hossain, 2006 | |
| R. solani | 5-Hydroxybrassicanal A | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| L.maculans | dioxibrassinin Brassilexin | − − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| Brassilexin | S. sclerotiorum | 1-(b-D-glc) brassilexin | − | Pedras and Hossain, 2006 | |
| Spirobrassinin | S. sclerotiorum | Spirooxathiazolidinone | − | Pedras and Hossain, 2006 | |
| Brassicanal A | L.maculans | 3-Methylindolyl-2-methylsulphoxide | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |
| S. sclerotiorum | 1-(b-D-glc) brassicanal A | − | Pedras and Hossain, 2006 | ||
| Camalexin | R. solani | 5-hydroxycamalexin | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |
| S. sclerotiorum | 1-(b-D-glc) camalexin | − | Pedras and Hossain, 2006 | ||
| B. cinerea | Indolethiocarboxamide | − | Pedras et al., 2011 | ||
| 6-Methoxy camalexin | S. sclerotiorum | 1-(b-D-glc) camalexin | − | Pedras and Hossain, 2006 | |
| Terpenoids | Capsidiol | B. cinerea | Capsenone | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 |
| F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum | Capsenone | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| Lubimin | Gibberella pulicaris | 2-Dehydrolubimin | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |
| Penicillium chrysogenum | 15-Dihydrolubimin | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | ||
| 3-Hydroxylubimin | P. chrysogenum | 3-Hydroxy-l5-dihydrolubimin | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |
| Rishitin | G.pulicaris | 13-Hydroxyrishitin 11,12-Epoxyrishitin | − − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 | |
| Linalool | B. cinerea | Multiple monoterpenes | − | Shimizu et al., 1982 | |
| Limonene | Grosmannia clavigera | Limonene-1,2-diol | + | Wang et al., 2014 | |
| Momilactone A | M. oryzae | 3,6-Dioxo-19-nor9β-pimara-7,15-diene | − | ||
| Monoterpenes | Heterobasidion parviporum | Multiple derivatives | − | Kusumoto et al., 2014 | |
| QN | o-Hibiscanone | V.dahliae | Hydroquinone derivative | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 |
| FFA | Wyerone epoxide | B. cinerea B. fabae | Wyerole poxide Dihydrodihydroxywyerol | − | Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005 |
Metabolization of inducible PDCs by fungal necrotrophs and hemibiotrophs.
GEC,gene or enzyme characterized?; QN,quinone; FFA,furanoid fatty acids.
Pterocarpans
Pterocarpans are class of inducible PDC produced in the phenylpropanoid pathway that are primarily associated with legume defense against biotic stress (). Pisatin is an antifungal pterocarpan that is produced in pea pods of Pisum sativum during pathogen challenge (Perrin and Bottomley, 1961). As one of the earliest discovered PDCs, pisatin was initially credited with driving non-host resistance in P. sativum to fungal pathogens, as only fungi adapted to this host environment are able to cause disease (). Pisatin detoxification in Nectria haematococca was attributed to microsomal cytochrome P450s capable of efficiently demethylating pisatin to the less toxic (+)-6a-hydroxymaackiain, and termed pisatin demethylases (PDAs) (; ). The gene encoding the primary PDA (PDA1) is located, along with several other pea pathogenicity genes (PEP genes), on a 1.6 Mb supernumerary chromosome which is dispensable for fungal survival in culture, but critical for pathogenicity on pea (Miao et al., 1991; ). While the function of most of these PEP genes is still unknown a single gene, PEP5, was found to be a likely efflux transporter (discussed in section “Toxin Efflux”), capable of increasing virulence on pea in the absence of other detoxification mechanisms (). Although PDA genes have been primarily characterized in Fusarium spp., PDA activity has been noted in other fungal pathogens of pea and putative orthologs are induced during infection in some broad host range necrotrophs (Table 1 and Figure 1) ().
FIGURE 1
A closely related pterocarpan, maackiain, plays a similar role to pisatin in chickpea defense and its detoxification is also highly correlated with N. haematococca virulence (Lucy et al., 1988). Three loci involved in the degradation of maackiain, and the related medicarpin, have been identified (MAK1-3), but only MAK1 has been fully characterized as a hydroxylase capable of converting maackiain into 1α-hydroxy-maackiain (Miao and Van Etten, 1992;
Another pterocarpan, phaseollidin, is known to accumulate during infection of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris, along with the isoflavonol kievitone (discussed below), and is degraded by some pathogens of P. vulgaris (Van Etten et al., 1989; Turbek et al., 1992). Early evaluation of phaseollidin metabolism by the pathogen Fusarium solani suggested that a single enzyme was detoxifying both compounds through a hydration reaction (
TABLE 2
| Species/substrate | Gene name | Protein type | Putative localization | Accession # |
| Isoflavones | ||||
| F. solani | khs | Kievitone Hydratase | Extracellular | L39639 |
| N. haematococca | NhKHS | Kievitone Hydratase | Extracellular | XM_003041138 |
| Pterocarpans | ||||
| F. oxysporum | FoPDA1 | Pisatin Demethylase (CYP450) | Microsome | 39939259 |
| N. haematococca | PDA1 | Pisatin Demethylase (CYP450) | Microsome | XM_003044179 |
| N. haematococca | MAK1 | Maackiain hydroxylase | Peroxisome | U35892 |
| F. solani | - | Phaseollidin hydratase | Extracellular* | − |
| Flavonols | ||||
| P. olsonii | poquer1 | Quercetinase | Extracellular | EU126643 |
| S. sclerotiorum | SsQDO | Quercetinase | Extracellular | XM_001587370 |
| V. dahliae | VdQase | Quercetinase | Cytoplasmic | XM_009653185 |
| Terpenoids | ||||
| G. clavigera | CMQ_7007 | Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenase | Peroxisome | XP_014176168 |
| G. clavigera | CMQ_6956 | Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenase | Peroxisome | XP_014176117 |
| Stilbenoids | ||||
| B. Cinerea | BcLcc2 | Laccase | Extracellular | XM_001553136 |
| E. polonica | EpCDO1 | Catechol dioxygenase | Cytoplasmic | KU221039 |
| E. polonica | EpCDO2 | Catechol dioxygenase | Cytoplasmic | KU221040 |
| E. polonica | EpCDO3 | Catechol dioxygenase | Cytoplasmic | KU221041 |
| E. polonica | EpCDO4 | Catechol dioxygenase | Extracellular | KU221042 |
| Indoles | ||||
| S. sclerotiorum | SsBGT1 | Glucosyltransferase | Extracellular | XM_001589312 |
| Hydrogen cyanide | ||||
| G. sorghi | Cht | Cyanide hydratase | Cytoplasmic | M99044 |
| L. maculans | Cht | Cyanide hydratase | Cytoplasmic | AF192405 |
| Benzoxazinoids | ||||
| F. verticillioides | Fdb1 (Mbl1) | Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) | Cytoplasmic | XM_018897183 |
| F. pseudograminearum | Fdb1 (Mbl1) | MBL | Cytoplasmic | XM_009261242 |
| F. graminearum | Fdb1 (Mbl1) | MBL | Cytoplasmic | VTO91902 |
| F. verticillioides | Fdb2 (Nat1) | Arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT) | Cytoplasmic | XM_018901986 |
| F. pseudograminearum | Fdb2 (Nat1) | NAT | Cytoplasmic | XM_009261241 |
| F. graminearum | Fdb2 (Nat1) | NAT | Cytoplasmic | VTO91902 |
| Saponins | ||||
| G. graminis | Avn | Avenacinase | Extracellular | U35463 |
| S. lycopersici | Tom | Tomatinase | Extracellular | U35462 |
| S. lycopersici | B2Tom | Tomatinase | Extracellular | AAB08445 |
| Stagonospora avenae | savBGL1 | Beta-glucosidase | Extracellular | AAT95376 |
| B. cinerea | sap1 | Avenacinase | Extracellular | XM_024695232 |
| N. vasinfecta | sdn1 | Saponin hydrolase | Extracellular | 42491247 |
| F. oxysporum | tom1 | Tomatinase | Extracellular | AJ012668 |
| Isothiocyanates | ||||
| S. sclerotiorum | SsSaxA | ITC hydrolases | Peroxisome | APA09264 |
| A. brassicicola | AbGST1 | Glutathione S-Transferase | Cytoplasmic | AY987487 |
Characterized genes encoding detoxification enzymes from fungal pathogens.
Putative localizations predicted using SignalP and DeepLoc softwares.
*Genetic information for this protein is unavailable, but protein characterization points toward secretion into extracellular space (Turbek et al., 1992).
Isoflavones
Isoflavones are a class of phenylpropanoids primarily known for their importance in legume defense to pathogens (
While no other isoflavone detoxification mechanisms have been specifically characterized, metabolic profiling has shown that other isoflavones, including the major isoflavones genistein and daidzein, can be metabolized by a number of other fungal pathogens (Table 1).
Other Flavonoids and Stilbenoids
Flavonol-type PDCs, such as quercetin and kaempferol, are found in a wide range of plants and demonstrate antimicrobial activity both in their free and glycosylated forms (Lygin et al., 2009; Sanzani et al., 2009;
Stilbenoids, another class of inducible PDC, help to modulate plant immunity to phytopathogens as well as UV and ozone stress (
Indoles
Indoles are a class of PDC known for their role in defense against biotic stress in cruciferous (brassica) vegetables (Pedras and Ahiahonu, 2005). Detoxification of indoles has been observed in broad-host range necrotrophs including Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and B. cinerea as well as the more specialized Brassicaceae pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans, albeit through seemingly distinct mechanisms (Table 1). A wide range of anti-fungal indoles have been characterized, yet only proteins with the capacity to degrade a single one, the phytoalexin brassinin, have been properly characterized (Table 1). Brassinin hydrolases (BHs), seen in the crucifer pathogens Alternaria brassicicola and L. maculans, transform brassinin to the less toxic indolyl-3-methanamine (Pedras et al., 2009). In addition to its BH activity, L. maculans also detoxifies brassinin through an inducible brassinin oxidase (BO) (Table 1) (Pedras et al., 2008). Both enzymes demonstrate a surprisingly narrow substrate range and are not only incapable of transforming related indoles, such as cyclobrassinin, but in many cases are competitively inhibited by them (Pedras et al., 2008, 2009). This inhibition is intriguing as brassinin is a metabolite required for the production of other antifungal indoles, meaning BH/BO activity may be achieving multiple goals simultaneously: (1) degrading antifungal brassinin in the host, (2) preventing the production of other antifungal indoles, and (3) preventing the production of BH/BO inhibitors.
Rather than oxidation/hydrolysis, S. sclerotiorum appears to detoxify brassinin using a rather uncommon glycosylation reaction in which brassinin is transformed through the conjugation of a glucose molecule. The enzyme responsible for this transformation, SsBGT1, appears to have a similar substrate specificity and induction pattern to other brassinin detoxifying enzymes, but inhibition by natural indoles has not been reported (Table 2) (Sexton et al., 2009). Metabolism of other indoles by fungal pathogens is summarized in Table 1.
Terpenes/Terpenoids
Unlike many of the above-described classes of PDC, which are formed as downstream products of the shikimate pathway, terpenoids are generated through either the mevalonate (MVA) or methylerythritol 4- phosphate (MEP) pathways in plants. Despite the broad range of terpenoids known to operate in chemical defense and the number of phytopathogens known to metabolize terpenoids in vitro, the only fungal enzymes characterized in terpenoid detoxification are from the pine pathogen Grosmannia clavigera (Table 1) (Wang et al., 2014). Multiple enzymes were involved in the metabolic utilization of monoterpenes, primarily the antifungal limonene, but only two Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenases were implicated specifically in enzymatic detoxification (Table 2) (Wang et al., 2014).
Enzymatic Detoxification of Non-Inducible PDCs
Non-inducible PDCs are defined in this review as low molecular weight antimicrobial compounds that are pre-formed in healthy plant tissue rather than being produced in response to pathogen invasion. This category includes many phytoanticipins, but excludes those which are both constitutively present in healthy tissue and are also induced in response to infection, examples of which include resveratrol and maackiain (Van Etten et al., 1994; Wang et al., 2013). Non-inducible PDCs are stored in either an active form or as inactive precursors which are activated in response to tissue damage (Tiku, 2020). As this damage is an inevitable result of fungal necrotrophy, these compounds provide protection that is less easily subverted by fungal effectors targeting plant defense pathways than phytoalexins might be. The following section will focus on the detoxification of important classes of non-inducible PDCs by fungal pathogens. A more complete summary of fungal metabolism of these compounds can be found in Table 3.
TABLE 3
| Class | Compound | Fungal species | Conversion product | GEC | Citation |
| Cyanide | Cyanide | L. maculans | Formamide | + | Sexton and Howlett, 2000 |
| Gloeocercospora sorghi | Formamide | + | Wang and Van Etten, 1992; Wang et al., 1999 | ||
| Stemphylium loti | Formamide | − | Nazlya et al., 1983 | ||
| F. moniliforme | Formamide | − | Nazlya et al., 1983 | ||
| C.graminicoal | Formamide | − | |||
| Helminthosporium maydis race T | Formamide | − | |||
| H. turcicum | Formamide | − | |||
| Macrophomina phaseoli | Formamide | − | |||
| Mycoleptodiscus terrestris | Formamide | − | |||
| Phoma spp. | Formamide | − | |||
| Saponins | Avenacoside A | Stagonospora avenae | Deglycosylated derivative | + | Morrissey et al., 2000 |
| Septoria avenae | Deglycosylated derivative | − | Wubben et al., 1996 | ||
| Avenacoside B | Stagonospora avenae | Deglycosylated derivative | + | Morrissey et al., 2000 | |
| Septoria avenae | Deglycosylated derivative | − | Wubben et al., 1996 | ||
| Avenacin A-1 | Gaeumannomyces graminis vat. tritici | Deglycosylated derivative | + | ||
| a-tomatine | B. cinerea | β-1-Tomatine | + | Quidde and Peter, 1999 | |
| F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici | Tomatidine | + | Roldán-arjona et al., 1999 | ||
| F. solani | Tomatidine | − | Lairini and Ruiz-rubio, 1998 | ||
| S. lycopersici | β-2-Tomatine | + | Martin-Hernandez et al., 2000; Sandrock and Van Etten, 2001 | ||
| A. alternata | Unknown product | − | Oka et al., 2006 | ||
| Corynespora cassiicola | Unknown product | − | Oka et al., 2006 | ||
| C.coccodes | Unknown product | + | Sandrock and Van Etten, 2001 | ||
| α-Solanine | G. pulicaris | γ-Solanine | − | Weltring et al., 1997 | |
| α-Chaconine | G. pilicaris | β-2-Chaconine | − | Weltring et al., 1997 | |
| Soyasaponin I | Neocosmospora vasinfecta var. vasinfecta | Soyasapogenol B Triose | + | Watanabe et al., 2004 | |
| Soyasaponin II | N.vasinfecta var. vasinfecta | Deglycosylated derivative | + | Watanabe et al., 2004 | |
| Benzoxazinoids | 2-Benzoxazolinone (BOA) | F.verticilloides | N-(2-hydroxyphenyl) malonamic acid (HPMA) | + | |
| F. graminearum | N-(2-hydroxyphenyl) malonamic acid (HPMA) | + | |||
| F. pseudograminearum | N-(2-hydroxyphenyl) malonamic acid (HPMA) | + | |||
| F. culmorum | N-(2-hydroxyphenyl) malonamic acid (HPMA) | − | |||
| G. graminis | N-(2-hydroxyphenyl) malonamic acid (HPMA) | − | |||
| 6-Methoxy-2-benzoxazolinone (MBOA) | F.verticilloides | N-(2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl (HMPMA) | + | ||
| F. pseudograminearum | N-(2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl (HMPMA) | + | |||
| G. graminis | N-(2-hydroxyphenyl) malonamic acid (HPMA) | − | |||
| ITCs | Benzyl isothiocyanates | A. brassicicola | S-glutathionylated product | + | Sellam et al., 2006 |
| Allylisothiocyanates | A. brassicicola | S-glutathionylated product | + | Sellam et al., 2006 | |
| 4-methylsulfinylbutyl ITC | S. sclerotiorum | 4-Methylsulfinylbutyl acetamide | + | ||
| 4-MethylsulfinylbutylN-acetylcysteine | − | ||||
Metabolism of non-inducible PDCs by fungal necrotrophs and hemibiotrophs.
GEC,gene or enzyme characterized?
Hydrogen Cyanide
Cyanogenic plants are a broad group, including thousands of individual plant species and >120 plant families, that are characterized by the presence of cyanogenic glycosides in their tissue (Tiku, 2020). Tissue damage leads to the release of plant glycoside hydrolases which cleave the sugar moiety, converting these glycosides to cyanohydrins, which are subsequently transformed to hydrogen cyanide (HCN) by hydroxynitrile lyases (Tiku, 2020). Pathogens of cyanogenic plants are all capable of tolerating HCN and a single mechanism, cyanide hydration, appears to be an incredibly conserved detoxification mechanism used across fungal pathogens of these plants (Table 3) (
Saponins
Saponins are compounds containing a triterpenoid steroid, or steroidal glycoalkaloid bound to one or more sugar chains and have been utilized for hundreds of years as a surfactant, but have gained notoriety in recent decades for their antimicrobial properties (Osbourn, 1996). Prior to pathogen attack saponins are kept in an inactive form with multiple sugar chains bound to the alkaloid and are spatially separated from the hydrolytic enzymes needed to activate them. In response to tissue damage, this compartmentalization which maintains saponin precursors in vacuoles and hydrolytic enzymes in plastids breaks down, allowing the enzymes to cleave one or more sugars to generate bioactive saponins. Unlike most other phytoanticipins that are fully deglycosylated during activation, the antifungal activity of saponins are dependent on their sugar moieties (Osbourn, 1996).
Nearly all pathogens of saponin-containing plants depend on some detoxifying activity to tolerate these compounds during infection, and all characterized saponin detoxification enzymes operate through the cleavage of one or more sugar molecules from the compounds sugar chain (Osbourn, 1996) (Tables 2, 3). The first discovered of these enzymes, an avenacinase termed Avn, is used by the Take-All fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis to detoxify oat saponins and is seemingly a singular determinant in the pathogens capacity to infect oats (discussed further in section “The Role of PDC Tolerance in Fungal Host Range”) (
While SHs were originally thought to be somewhat specific to oat pathogens, studies into the saponin detoxifying activity of the tomato pathogen Septoria lycopersici found that it utilized a secreted tomatinase enzyme (Tom) with homology to Avn from G. graminis (Osbourn et al., 1995). Tomatinases, named for their ability to degrade the important tomato saponin α-tomatine, are found in a wide range of tomato-infecting fungal pathogens (Tables 2, 3). The presence of avenacinases, tomatinases, and other SHs is highly correlated with the ability to infect saponin-containing plants, but as many pathogens contain multiple distinct SHs that are active during pathogenesis, the importance of individual enzymes in virulence is difficult to discern through simple gene disruption experiments (Quidde and Peter, 1999;
Benzoxazinoids
Benzoxazinoid-type phytoanticipins are indole-derived compounds common across cereal crops and are broadly toxic to pathogens and pests (Tiku, 2020). Similar to other phytoanticipins, benzoxazinoids are stores in a glycosylated form in plant vacuoles and are converted to their active form by plant glucosidases in response to tissue damage (
Isothiocyanates
Glucosinolates are amino acid derived plant compounds that are converted into toxic isothiocyanates (ITCs) in response to tissue damage. These compounds are found primarily in cruciferous plants, and ITCs are potent in suppressing both invasion by fungal/bacterial pathogens and herbivory by pests (
Evidence suggests that the broad-host range pathogen S. sclerotiorum also uses GST activity in the detoxification of ITCs to a minor extent, but the major detoxification mechanism (100-fold greater) appears to be through hydrolytic degradation. An ITC hydrolase, SsSaxA, is credited with this activity and is capable of efficiently degrading the aliphatic and aromatic ITCs of the host Arabidopsis thaliana (
Phenylpropanoid Derivatives
Derivatives of the phenylpropanoid pathway, including ferulic and cinnamic acid, are aromatic compounds necessary for the generation of structural lignin as well as other physiological processes (Mäkelä et al., 2015). While not typically classified as phytoanticipins due to their pivotal role in plant physiology, they share many characteristics including a constitutive presence in plant tissue and antifungal activity (Pacheco et al., 2018). It has been demonstrated that the accumulation of these compounds in plant tissue is important for soybean resistance to the broad host-range necrotroph S. sclerotiorum and the capacity to metabolize these compounds to some extent is a rather ubiquitous feature of filamentous fungi (Mäkelä et al., 2015; Ranjan et al., 2019). To our knowledge the mechanism for this metabolization of phenylpropanoid derivatives has not been characterized in any fungal species despite the necessity of such a process in colonizing plant tissue.
Toxin Efflux
While degradative detoxification of PDCs has received a large amount of attention in recent years, it has long been known that some non-degradative mechanism of fungal tolerance to PDCs exists as well (
Contrary to the enzymatic detoxification of PDCs, toxin efflux operates through the activity of membrane bound substrate transport proteins that work to either export or sequester toxic compounds. Broadly, these proteins can be separated into ABC transporters that operate using energy from ATP hydrolysis and major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporters which utilize a chemiosmotic gradient generated across the membrane to move substrate (Pao et al., 1998). As plant hosts typically possess a repertoire of chemically related PDCs, efflux proteins often have a broad substrate binding affinity and are thus referred to as pleiotropic and/or multidrug resistance proteins (PDR and/or MDR). These proteins are most often transcriptionally regulated and thus some insight into their substrate range can be gained through the accumulation of their RNA transcripts upon exposure to various compounds (Schoonbeek et al., 2001; Semighini et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2005;
True to their name as pleiotropic drug resistance proteins, individual efflux transporters are often shown to be active against a range of chemically distinct compounds (Roohparvar et al., 2007). This broad range of activity has been functionally validated in multiple transporters within the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici, where ectopic expression of these transporters in yeast conferred increased tolerance to a variety of antifungal compounds. Surprisingly, though, genetic knockouts of these transporters often show no reduction in virulence (Table 4). Multiple theories have been discussed to address this, the most common being a functional redundancy between transporters with similar substrate ranges. Substrate redundancy across a range of toxic compounds has been observed in the broad host-range pathogen B. cinerea, the wheat pathogen Z. tritici, and the saprotroph Aspergillus nidulans (Semighini et al., 2002; Schoonbeek et al., 2003; Zwiers et al., 2003). This redundancy has been characterized in both plant and animal pathogens and often requires multiple transporters to be knocked out in a single mutant to see the expected increase in sensitivity to a suspected substrate (Sanglard et al., 1997;
TABLE 4
| Species | Gene name | Transporter type | Putative substrate/ligand | PCV? | Accession |
| Alternaria alternata | AaMFS54 | MFS | Diverse range of xenobiotics | Yes | CP061877 |
| Botrytis Cinerea | BcAtrA | ABC | Cycloheximide, catechol, eugenol | No | XM_001558433 |
| BcAtrB | ABC | Diverse range of xenobiotics | Yes | XM_024696626 | |
| BcAtrD | ABC | DMI fungicides, cycloheximide, eugenol | No | XM_001555199 | |
| BcAtrF | ABC | Resveratrol | NT | AAF64440 | |
| BcAtrG | ABC | Cycloheximide, tomatin, multiple phenolics | NT | CAB92309 | |
| Bmr1 | ABC | Multiple fungicide classes, resveratrol | NT | XM_001561290 | |
| Bmr3 | ABC | Multiple fungicide classes, resveratrol | NT | XM_024693911 | |
| mfsG | MFS | Isothiocyanates | Yes | XM_024693262 | |
| Bcmfs1 | MFS | Camptothecin, DMI fungicides | No | AF238225 | |
| Bcmfs2 | MFS | Cycloheximide, tomatin | NT | XP_024546409 | |
| Bcmfs4 | MFS | Cycloheximide, psoralen, multiple phenolics | NT | XM_024691536 | |
| Clarireedia Jacksonii | ShPDR1 | ABC | Multiple fungicide classes | NT | KJ128076 |
| Colletotrichum acutatum | CaABC1 | ABC | Multiple fungicide classes, Hygromycin | NT | KM264299 |
| Gibberella pulicaris | Gpabc1 | ABC | Rishitin | Yes | AJ306607 |
| Grosmannia clavigera | GcABC-G1 | ABC | Monoterpenes | Yes | EFX05787 |
| Magnaporthe grisea | ABC1 | ABC | Unknown | Yes | XM_003717474 |
| ABC2 | ABC | DMI fungicides, Camptothecin, cycloheximide | No | AB091269 | |
| ABC4 | ABC | Resveratrol, miconazole, cycloheximide | Yes | XM_003717966 | |
| Zymoseptoria tritici | MgAtr1 | ABC | Diverse range of xenobiotics | No | XM_003857588 |
| MgAtr2 | ABC | Diverse range of xenobiotics | No | XM_003848105 | |
| MgAtr4 | ABC | Diverse range of xenobiotics | Yes | XM_003848300 | |
| MgAtr5 | ABC | Berberine, camptothecin | No | XM_003852443 | |
| MgMFS1 | MFS | Azoles, plant alkaloids, mycotoxins | No | XM_003850512 | |
| Nectria haematococca | NhABC1 | ABC | Pisatin, Rishitin | Yes | HM106507 |
| PEP5 | MFS | Unknown | Yes | XM_003044178 | |
| Penicillium digitatum | PMR1 | ABC | DMI fungicides, phloretin, camptothecin, oligomycin | No | AB010442 |
| PMR5 | ABC | Diverse range of xenobiotics | No | AB060639 | |
| PdMfs1 | MFS | DMI fungicides, Plant metabolites suspected | Yes | AM412556 | |
| PdMFS1 | MFS | Prochloraz | Yes | GU124565 | |
| PdMFS2 | MFS | Prochloraz | Yes | GU228489 |
Putative efflux transporters involved in fungal tolerance to plant defense compounds.
PCV, positively correlated with virulence.
The importance of a distinct transporter in infection is dependent on the hosts antimicrobial repertoire, so an additional explanation is that it may be necessary to screen multiple hosts before finding one in which a given transporter is pivotal to pathogenicity. In the case of the B. cinerea ABC transporter BcAtrB, knockout mutants showed no reduction in virulence on basil, but were compromised during infection of A. thaliana and grapevine (Schoonbeek et al., 2001, 2003; Stefanato et al., 2009).
Although there are certainly incidences in which the role of a putative efflux transporter is vague, many of those characterized in necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens have a clear role in virulence (Table 4). This role is often elucidated through a mixture of in vitro sensitivity and disease assays to establish a likely PDC substrate and quantify the importance during host colonization, but it’s typically difficult to prove causation between the loss of specific efflux activity and a reduction in virulence. This concern has been raised given that some transporters which contribute to MDR may do so as a side-effect of primary roles in lipid transport, plasma membrane integrity, and/or fungal development (Stergiopoulos et al., 2003;
While the importance of efflux in fungal tolerance to a number of PDCs is apparent, an inherent limitation to this mechanism is that it can only act on PDCs that target components within the fungal cell. Accordingly, there are a number of transporters with apparent activity against resveratrol, a plant stilbenoid thought to target cellular respiration, but none that act against plant saponins, which target the plasma membrane (Osbourn, 1996; Schoonbeek et al., 2001, 2003;
Working in Concert: Multiple Mechanisms of Toxin Tolerance
Cooperative relationships between efflux transporters and other detoxification mechanisms is expected, and have been described in multiple pathosystems, including G. clavigera (Wang et al., 2012, 2014), B. cinerea (Schouten et al., 2008), and N. haematococca (
In addition to the broad use of detoxification enzymes, some fungi may also modify the infection court in a coordinated approach. B. cinerea has a repertoire of enzymes that are known to be involved in the degradation of saponins (Quidde and Peter, 1999). Interestingly, B. cinerea also acidifies host tissue during infection to facilitate disease, this increasingly acidic environment causes saponins to lose their antifungal activity (
Another tool at the disposal of fungal pathogens noted in this review, is to simply deploy multiple enzymes that act in concert to deal with specific plant metabolites. It has been noted on multiple occasions that genes putatively involved in fungal detoxification are often conserved in gene clusters, similar to the secondary metabolite gene clusters found in most fungal genomes (
Metabolism or Detoxification: Maybe Both?
Mechanisms for detoxifying PDC’s in phytopathogenic fungi are, at their core, responsible for overcoming plant immunity and facilitating the metabolism of host tissue. Given this fact it is tempting to draw a line between detoxification and metabolism, when in fact data suggests that they are far more interconnected than originally thought. An interesting example of this can be seen in the D-galacturonic acid (GalA) metabolic pathway, which is highly conserved in among pectin-degrading filamentous fungi (a category encompassing nearly all fungal necrotrophs and hemibiotrophs) (Martens-uzunova and Schaap, 2008). GalA is the primary constituent of pectin in plants and is degraded by fungal pathogens through a four step metabolic pathway into glycerol and pyruvate (Martens-uzunova and Schaap, 2008). While GalA is often considered a simple nutrient source for fungi, it is also capable of actively inhibiting the growth of the non-pathogenic yeast S. cerevisiae, indicating that the compound may have some antimicrobial properties (
Similar overlaps between metabolism and detoxification have been seen in the spruce pathogen E. polonica and the pine pathogen G. clavigera. Both pathogens must detoxify antimicrobials, primarily stilbenoids and terpenoids, induced by their beetle vectors at the site of infection (
The function of saponin hydrolase enzymes is another potential example of this crossover, they are used by many phytopathogenic fungi to detoxify plant saponins, a class of molecules typically consisting of a hydrophobic aglycone with appended sugar molecules. These enzymes reduce the antifungal activity of saponins through the removal of sugar molecules from their glycosyl chains, releasing glucose and/or other sugars in the process (Osbourn, 1996). While the metabolic utilization of these released sugars has not been specifically addressed to our knowledge, it would be expected if these sugars were used by the pathogen as a carbon source. Many of these enzymes belong to the glycoside hydrolase family 3 (GH3) family of proteins and are related to cellobiose degrading enzymes used to release sugars from plant cell walls during fungal necrotrophy (Osbourn et al., 1995).
The Role of PDC Tolerance in Fungal Host Range
Tolerance to specific plant defense compounds, be it through detoxification, efflux, or target modification, is an absolute necessity in a pathogen’s capacity to infect a host and is therefore a major determinant in its host range. The simplest example of this phenomenon is seen in the take-all pathogen G. graminis, which can infect a range of cereal crops. Varieties of G. graminis differ in their ability to infect oat and these differences appear to be largely defined by their capacity to detoxify saponins, which are found in most oats but are absent in many other cereal species (
Pisatin detoxification also appears to be important in the ability for Fusarium species to infect pea, as pisatin is one of its primary defense compounds induced during fungal infection and tolerance to pisatin appears critical for host tissue colonization (
In the case of broad-host range pathogens detoxification is critically important as the fungus must maintain a repertoire of detoxification genes to tolerate the wide array of defense compounds being brought to bear in different hosts. These genes hold differential importance on distinct hosts as can be seen in the broad-host range pathogens S. sclerotiorum and B. cinerea (Figure 1). Both pathogens contain genes encoding putative cyanide hydratases for the detoxification of HCN and induction of this gene is likely regulated by the HCN content of the host, as cyanide hydratase expression has a dose-dependent relationship to cyanide content in other fungal systems (
An expansion of host range has been demonstrated through the horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of host-specific toxins in wheat pathogens, and a similar transfer of detoxification genes may have also allowed for the expansion of other pathogens to novel hosts (Mcdonald et al., 2019). Evidence suggests that phytopathogenic oomycetes gained cyanide hydratase genes through HGT from true fungi and benzoxazinoid detoxifying gene clusters appear to have spread through a similar mechanism from Fusarium spp. to species of Colletotrichum and Aspergillus (Richards et al., 2011;
Detoxification and Plant Defense Signaling
In most plant–pathogen interactions the primary purpose of PDC detoxification appears to be the protection of the pathogen, but in some cases the metabolism of PDCs may play a larger role in subverting host defenses. This is highlighted by the tomatinase enzyme from S. lycopersici (Tom), which is known to hydrolyze the tomato phytoanticipin α-tomatine (Table 2) (Martin-Hernandez et al., 2000). An examination of tomatinase activity in Nicotiana benthamiana found evidence that the enzyme appears to suppress the host’s broader immune response in addition to its role in saponin detoxification (
These studies present an attractive avenue for future research, as the putative role of detoxification metabolites in actively facilitating infection has been largely overlooked. A potential example of this can be seen in the conversion of the flavanone sakuranetin into naringenin by the rice pathogen M. oryzae during infection (
Manipulating Fungal Detoxification in Disease Control
Disruption of fungal detoxification activity can have a substantial effect on pathogenicity and subversion of this activity is potentially valuable in disease control across a wide range of crops. A novel approach to disease control through the subversion of fungal detoxification has been demonstrated with the usage synthetic compounds, termed paldoxins. Paldoxins, coined from “phytoalexin detoxification inhibitors,” are rationally designed compounds which inhibit the enzymatic detoxification mechanisms used by plant pathogens without the antifungal bioactivity seen in phytoalexins. This concept was originally demonstrated with the indoles cyclobrassinin and camalexin, which competitively bind to and inhibit brassinin degrading enzymes (BH and BO discussed in section “Enzymatic Detoxification of Inducible PDCs – Indoles”), but as phytoalexins themselves these compounds do not qualify as paldoxins. As opposed to other fungicides which are directly toxic to the pathogen itself, paldoxins would potentially allow for the plant to defend itself from invasion without the off target ecological effects of a broad-range fungicide (Pedras and Abdoli, 2017).
Inhibitors of ABC transporter-mediated efflux have also been proposed as a method to control fungal diseases, albeit in combination with chemical fungicides. Efflux is a major mechanism of derived fungal resistance to fungicides and by applying synthetic efflux inhibitors in combination with certain fungicides, it was shown that resistant isolates can be reverted to baseline levels of susceptibility, thus improving chemical control through fungicides (Reimann and Deising, 2005).
Reduced virulence is also achieved in a number of fungal pathogens through the silencing of pathogenicity and developmental factors (McLoughlin et al., 2018; Rosa et al., 2018). The usage of host-induced or spray-induced gene silencing (HIGS or SIGS) has never directly been used on genes involved in fungal detoxification, but as many studies demonstrated the critical importance many of these genes in host colonization, they may prove to be valuable targets for RNAi approaches (
Conclusion
In order to overcome both a plant’s induced and preformed PDCs during necrotrophic colonization, fungal pathogens utilize a number of distinct mechanisms (Figure 2). The earliest response to these compounds is the production of efflux transporters that work to export, or potentially sequester, toxic compounds below a lethal and/or inhibitory threshold. Secreted enzymes are then produced and metabolize PDCs in extracellular spaces, both to protect the pathogen from these compounds and, in some cases, prevent the production of other downstream antimicrobials. Many detoxification enzymes are intracellular as well, and the localization of these proteins either inside the fungal cell or in extracellular spaces can be a factor of the protein’s mechanism of action, the chemistry of its target substrate, and/or the PDC’s target in the fungus (i.e., plasma membrane vs. mitochondria) (Figure 2 and Table 2).
FIGURE 2

Diagram outlining generalized mechanisms of fungal tolerance for preformed and inducible plant defense compounds (PDCs). Examples of each class of PDC, detoxification enzyme, and transporter are included. Question marks denote a mechanism which is suspected but has yet to be confirmed through experimental evidence.
These detoxification mechanisms provide several benefits to the pathogen as they can quantitatively increase virulence and in some cases expand its host range to previously resistant plants. Additionally, when efficiently metabolized the formally toxic PDCs can serve as a valuable nutrient source during colonization. Overall, the range and redundancy of these mechanisms are evidence for the importance they play in most if not all necrotrophic/hemibiotrophic infections of plants, and a better understanding of these mechanisms will undoubtedly improve disease control strategies.
Statements
Author contributions
NW wrote the manuscript. NW, MK, and DS revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture – National Sclerotinia Initiative (Award # 58-3060-8-023) to MK and DS.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AdrianM.JeandetP. (2012). Effects of resveratrol on the ultrastructure of Botrytis cinerea conidia and biological significance in Plant/Pathogen interactions.Fitoterapia831345–1350. 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.04.004
2
AhujaI.KissenR.BonesA. M. (2012). Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens.Trends Plant Sci.1773–90. 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.11.002
3
AlamoutiS.WangV.DiguistiniS.SixD. L.BohlmanJ.HamelinR. C.et al (2011). Gene genealogies reveal cryptic species and host preferences for the pine fungal pathogen Grosmannia clavigera.Mol. Ecol.202581–2602. 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05109.x
4
BaldwinT.BaldwinS.KlosK.BregitzerP.MarshallJ. (2019). Deletion of the benzoxazinoid detoxification gene NAT1 in Fusarium graminearum reduces deoxynivalenol in spring wheat.PLoS One14:e0214230. 10.1371/journal.pone.0214230
5
BalziE.WangM.LetermeS.Van DyckL.GoffeauA. (1994). PDR5, a novel yeast multidrug resistance conferring transporter controlled by the transcription regulator PDR1.J. Biol. Chem.2692206–2214. 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)42155-7
6
BarclayM.DayJ. C.ThompsonI. P.KnowlesC. J.BaileyM. J. (2002). Substrate-regulated cyanide hydratase (Chy) gene expression in Fusarium solani: the potential of a transcription-based assay for monitoring the biotransformation of cyanide complexes.Environ. Microbiol.4183–189. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00284.x
7
BasseC. W. (2005). Dissecting defense-related and developmental transcriptional responses of maize during ustilago maydis infection and subsequent tumor formation.Plant Physiol.1381774–1784. 10.1104/pp.105.061200
8
BednarekP.Pislewska-BednarekM.SvatosA.SchneiderB.DoubskyJ.MansurovaM.et al (2009). A glucosinolate metabolism pathway in living plant cells mediates broad-spectrum antifungal defense.Science323101–106. 10.1126/science.1163732
9
BirgitH.ArnemannM.SchwenenL.StöcklD.BringmannG.JansenJ.et al (1989). Degradation of the pterocarpan Phytoalexin (—)-Maackiain by ascochyta rabiei.Z. Naturforsc.44c771–776. 10.1515/znc-1989-9-1012
10
BouarabK.MeltonR.PeartJ.BaulcombeD.OsbournA. (2002). A saponin-detoxifying enzyme mediates suppression of plant defences.Nature418889–892. 10.1038/nature00950
11
BowyerP.ClarkeB. R.LunnessP.DanielsM. J.OsbournA. E. (1995). Host range of a plant pathogenic fungus determined by a saponin detoxifying enzyme.Science267371–374. 10.1126/science.7824933
12
BuxdorfK.YaffeH.BardaO.LevyM. (2013). The effects of glucosinolates and their breakdown products on necrotrophic fungi.PLoS One8:e70771. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070771
13
CalmesB.Morel-rouhierM.Bataillé-simoneauN.GelhayeE.GuillemetteT.SimoneauP. (2015). Characterization of glutathione transferases involved in the pathogenicity of Alternaria brassicicola.BMC Microbiol.15:123. 10.1186/s12866-015-0462-0
14
CarusoF.MendozaL.CastroP.CotorasM.AguirreM.MatsuhiroB.et al (2011). Antifungal activity of resveratrol against Botrytis cinerea is improved using 2-Furyl Derivatives.PLoS One6:e25421. 10.1371/journal.pone.0025421
15
ChenJ.UllahC.ReicheltM.BeranF.YangZ. L.GershenzonJ.et al (2020). The phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum detoxifies plant glucosinolate hydrolysis products via an isothiocyanate hydrolase.Nat. Commun.111–12.
16
ChenJ.UllahC.ReicheltM.GershenzonJ.HammerbacherA. (2019). Sclerotinia sclerotiorum circumvents flavonoid defenses by catabolizing flavonol glycosides and aglycones.Plant Physiol.1801975–1987. 10.1104/pp.19.00461
17
ChongJ.PoutaraudA.HugueneyP. (2009). Metabolism and roles of stilbenes in plants.Plant Sci.177143–155. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.05.012
18
CiuffettiL. M.Van EttenH. D. (1996). Virulence of a pisatin demethylase-deficient nectria haematococca MPVI Isolate is increased by transformation with a pisatin demethylase Gene.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.9787–792. 10.1094/mpmi-9-0787
19
ColemanJ. J.WasmannC. C.UsamiT.WhiteG. J.EstebanD.MccluskeyK.et al (2011a). Characterization of the gene encoding pisatin demethylase (FoPDA 1) in Fusarium oxysporum.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.241482–1491. 10.1094/mpmi-05-11-0119
20
ColemanJ. J.WhiteG. J.Rodriguez-carresM.Van EttenH. D. (2011b). An ABC transporter and a cytochrome P450 of nectria haematococca MPVI are virulence factors on pea and are the major tolerance mechanisms to the phytoalexin pisatin.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.24368–376. 10.1094/mpmi-09-10-0198
21
CovertS. F.EnkerliJ.MiaoV. P. W.Van EttenH. D. (1996). A gene for maackiain detoxification from a dispensable chromosome of nectria haematococca.Mol. General Genet.251397–406. 10.1007/bf02172367
22
CruickshankI. A. M.PerrinD. R. (1962). Studies on phytoalexins.Aust. J. Biol. Sci.15147–159. 10.1071/bi9620147
23
CurirP.DolciM.CoreaG.GaleottiF.LanzottiV. (2006). The plant antifungal isoflavone genistein is metabolized by armillaria mellea vahl to give non- fungitoxic products.Plant Biosyst.140156–162. 10.1080/11263500600756363
24
DaoxinL.Kuang-RenC.SmithD. A.SchardlC. L. (1995). The Fusarium solani gene encoding kievitone hydratase, a secreted enzyme that catalyzes detoxification of a bean phytoalexin.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.8388–397. 10.1094/mpmi-8-0388
25
DelseroneL. M.McCluskeyK.MatthewsD. E.Van EttenH. D. (1999). Pisatin demethylation by fungal pathogens and nonpathogens of pea: association with pisatin tolerance and virulence.Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.55317–326. 10.1006/pmpp.1999.0237
26
DengF.AokiM.YogoY. (2004). Effect of naringenin on the growth and lignin biosynthesis of gramineous plants.Weed Biol. Manag.449–55. 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2003.00119.x
27
DennyT. P.Van EttenH. D. (1982). Metabolism of the phytoalexins medicarpin and maackiain by Fusarium solani.Phytochemistry211023–1028. 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)82409-7
28
DennyT. P.Van EttenH. D. (1983a). Characterization of an inducible, nondegradative tolerance of nectria haematococca MP VI to phytoalexins.J. Gen. Microbiol.1292903–2913. 10.1099/00221287-129-9-2903
29
DennyT. P.Van EttenH. D. (1983b). Tolerance of nectria haematococca MP VI to the phytoalexin pisatin in the absence of detoxification.J. Gen. Microbiol.1292893–2901. 10.1099/00221287-129-9-2893
30
DewickP. M.SteeleM. (1982). Biosynthesis of the phytoalexin phaseollin in Phaseolus vulgaris.Phytochemistry211599–1603. 10.1016/s0031-9422(82)85024-3
31
DixonR. A.AchnineL.KotaP.LiuC.Srinivasa ReddyM. S.WangL. (2002). The Phenylpropanoid pathway and plant Defence — a genomics perspective.Mol. Plant Pathol.3371–390. 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00131.x
32
DubrovinaA. S.KiselevK. V. (2017). Regulation of stilbene biosynthesis in plants.Planta246597–623. 10.1007/s00425-017-2730-8
33
DufresneM.HugouvieuxV.MeltonR.OsbournA. (2000). Effects of targeted replacement of the tomatinase gene on the interaction of septoria lycopersici with tomato plants.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.131301–1311.
34
El HadramiA.AdamL. R.DaayfF. (2011). Biocontrol treatments confer protection against verticillium dahliae infection of potato by inducing antimicrobial metabolites.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.24328–335. 10.1094/mpmi-04-10-0098
35
El HadramiA.IslamR.AdamL. R.DaayfF. (2015). A Cupin domain-containing protein with a quercetinase activity (VdQase) regulates verticillium dahliae’s pathogenicity and contributes to counteracting host defenses.Front. Microbiol.6:440. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00440
36
EnglederM.HorvatM.Emmerstorfer-AugustinA.WriessneggerT.GabrielS.StrohmeierG.et al (2018). Recombinant expression, purification and biochemical characterization of kievitone hydratase from nectria haematococca.PLoS One13:e0192653. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192653
37
EnkerliJ.BhattG.CovertS. F. (1998). Maackiain detoxification contributes to the virulence of nectria haematococca MP VI on chickpea.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.11317–326. 10.1094/mpmi.1998.11.4.317
38
EsakiH.OnozakiH.MorimitsuY.KawakishiS. (1998). Potent antioxidative isoflavones isolated from soybeans fermented with Aspergillus saitoi.Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.62740–746. 10.1271/bbb.62.740
39
FranceschiV. R.KrokeneP.ChristiansenE.KreklingT. (2005). Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests.New Phytol.167353–376. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x
40
FriebeA.VilichV.HennigL.KlugeM.SickerD. (1998). Detoxification of benzoxazolinone allelochemicals from wheat by Gaeumannomyces graminis Var. Tritici, G. Graminis Var. Graminis, G. Graminis Var. Avenae, and Fusarium culmorum.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.642386–2391. 10.1128/aem.64.7.2386-2391.1998
41
FryW. E.EvansP. H. (1977). Association of formamide hydrolyase with fungal pathogenicity to cyanogenic plants.Phytopathology671001–1006. 10.1094/phyto-67-1001
42
GeorgeH. L.HirschiK. D.Van EttenH. D. (1998). Biochemical properties of the products of cytochrome P450 Genes (PDA) encoding pisatin demethylase activity in nectria haematococca.Arch. Microbiol.170147–154. 10.1007/s002030050627
43
GeorgeH. L.Van EttenH. D. (2001). Characterization of pisatin-inducible cytochrome P450s in fungal pathogens of pea that detoxify the pea phytoalexin pisatin.Fungal Genet. Biol.3337–48. 10.1006/fgbi.2001.1270
44
GlennA. E.BaconC. W. (2009). FDB2 encodes a member of the arylamine N -acetyltransferase family and is necessary for biotransformation of benzoxazolinones by Fusarium verticillioides.J. Agric. Food Chem.107657–671. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04246.x
45
GlennA. E.Britton DavisC.GaoM.GoldS. E.MitchellT. R.ProctorR. H.et al (2016). Two horizontally transferred xenobiotic resistance gene clusters associated with detoxification of benzoxazolinones by Fusarium Species.PLoS One11:e0147486. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147486
46
GlennA. E.GoldS. E.BaconC. W. (2002). Fdb1 and Fdb2, Fusarium verticillioides loci necessary for detoxification of preformed antimicrobials from corn.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.1591–101. 10.1094/mpmi.2002.15.2.91
47
Gluck-thalerE.SlotJ. C. (2018). Specialized plant biochemistry drives gene clustering in fungi.ISME J.121694–1705. 10.1038/s41396-018-0075-3
48
GuptaA.ChattooB. B. (2008). Functional analysis of a novel ABC transporter ABC4 from magnaporthe grisea.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.27822–28. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00937.x
49
HaileZ. M.PilatiS.SonegoP.MalacarneG.VrhovsekU.EngelenK.et al (2017). Molecular analysis of the early interaction between the grapevine flower and Botrytis cinerea reveals that prompt activation of specific host pathways leads to fungus quiescence.Plant Cell Environ.401409–1428. 10.1111/pce.12937
50
HanY.LiuX.BennyU.KistlerH. C.Van EttenH. D. (2001). Genes determining pathogenicity to pea are clustered on a supernumerary chromosome in the fungal plant pathogen Nectria Haematococca.Plant J.25305–314. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00969.x
51
HayashiK.SchoonbeekH.De WaardM. A. (2002). Bcmfs1, a novel major facilitator superfamily transporter from Botrytis cinerea, provides tolerance towards the natural toxic compounds camptothecin and cercosporin and towards fungicides.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.684996–5004. 10.1128/aem.68.10.4996-5004.2002
52
HigginsJ. (1981). Demethylation of the phytoalexin pisatin by Stemphylium botryosum.Can. J. Bot.591980–1981.
53
HigginsV. J.StoesslA.HeathM. C. (1973). Conversion of phaseollin to phaseollinisoflavan by Stemphylium botryosum.Phytopathology64105–107. 10.1094/phyto-64-105
54
HuisjesE. H.De HulsterE.Van DamJ. C.PronkJ. T.Van MarisA. J. A. (2012). Galacturonic acid inhibits the growth of saccharomyces cerevisiae on galactose, xylose, arabinose.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.785052–5059. 10.1128/aem.07617-11
55
ImaiT.OhashiY.MitsuharaI.SeoS.HasegawaM. (2012). Identification of a degradation intermediate of the momilactone a rice phytoalexin by the rice blast fungus of the momilactone a rice phytoalexin by the rice blast fungus.Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.76414–416. 10.1271/bbb.110756
56
InghamJ. L. (1976). Fungal modification of pterocarpan phytoalexins from melilotus alba and trifolium pratense.Phytochemistry151489–1495. 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)88922-0
57
KatsumataS.HamanaK.HorieK.ToshimaH.HasegawaM. (2017). Identification of sternbin and naringenin as detoxified metabolites from the rice flavanone phytoalexin sakuranetin by Pyricularia Oryzae.Chem. Biodiv.14:e1600240. 10.1002/cbdv.201600240
58
KatsumataS.ToshimaH.HasegawaM. (2018). Xylosylated detoxification of the rice flavonoid phytoalexin sakuranetin by the rice sheath blight.Molecules23:276. 10.3390/molecules23020276
59
KeelingC. I.BohlmannJ. (2006). Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens.New Phytol.170657–675. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01716.x
60
KettleA. J.BatleyJ.BenfieldA. H.MannersJ. M.KazanK.GardinerD. M. (2015). Degradation of the benzoxazolinone class of phytoalexins is important for virulence of Fusarium pseudograminearum towards wheat.Mol. Plant Pathol.16946–962. 10.1111/mpp.12250
61
KraftB.SchwenenL.StocklD.BarzW. (1987). Degradation of the pterocarpan phytoalexin medicarpin by ascochyta rabiei.Arch. Microbiol.147201–206. 10.1007/bf00415285
62
KuhnP. J.SmithD. A. (1979). Isolation from Fusarium solani f. Sp. Phaseoli of an enzymic system responsible for kievitone and phaseollidin detoxification.Physiol. Plant Pathol.14179–190. 10.1016/0048-4059(79)90006-7
63
KunzC.VandelleE.RollandS.PoinssotB.BruelC.CimermanA.et al (2006). Characterization of a new, nonpathogenic mutant of Botrytis cinerea with impaired plant colonization capacity.New Phytol.170537–550. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01682.x
64
KusumotoN.ZhaoT.SwedjemarkG.AshitaniT.TakahashiK.Borg-KarlsonA. K. (2014). Antifungal properties of terpenoids in picea abies against heterobasidion parviporum.For. Pathol.44353–361.
65
LairiniK.Ruiz-rubioM. (1998). Detoxification of α -Tomatine by Fusarium solani.Mycol. Res.1021375–1380. 10.1017/s095375629800656x
66
LeeY. J.YamamotoK.HamamotoH.NakauneR.HibiT. (2005). A novel ABC transporter gene ABC2 involved in multidrug susceptibility but not pathogenicity in rice blast fungus, magnaporthe grisea.Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.8113–23. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2004.07.007
67
LucyM. C.MatthewsP. S.Van EttenH. D. (1988). Metabolic detoxification of the phytoalexins maackiain and medicarpin by nectria haematococca field isolates: relatioship to virulence on chickpea.Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.33187–199. 10.1016/0885-5765(88)90019-7
68
LyginA. V.LiS.VittalR.WidholmJ. M.HartmanG. L.LozovayaV. V. (2009). The importance of phenolic metabolism to limit the growth of phakopsora pachyrhizi.Phytopathology991412–1420. 10.1094/phyto-99-12-1412
69
MacfoyC. A.SmithI. M. (1979). Phytoalexin production and degradation in relation to resistance of clover leaves to sclerofinia and Botrytis Spp.Physiol. Plant Pathol.1499–111. 10.1016/0048-4059(79)90029-8
70
MäkeläM. R.MarinovićM.NousiainenP.LiwanagA. J. M.BenoitI.SipiläJ.et al (2015). Aromatic metabolism of filamentous fungi in relation to the presence of aromatic compounds in plant biomass.Adv. Appl. Microbio.9163–137. 10.1016/bs.aambs.2014.12.001
71
Martens-uzunovaE. S.SchaapP. J. (2008). An evolutionary conserved D-Galacturonic acid metabolic pathway operates across filamentous fungi capable of pectin degradation an evolutionary conserved D -Galacturonic acid metabolic pathway operates across filamentous fungi capable of pectin degradation.Fungal Genet. Biol.451449–1457. 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.08.002
72
Martin-HernandezA. M.DufresneM.HugouvieuxV.MeltonR.OsbournA. (2000). Effects of targeted replacement of the tomatinase gene on the interaction of septoria lycopersici with tomato plants.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.131301–1311. 10.1094/mpmi.2000.13.12.1301
73
McdonaldM. C.TarantoA. P.HillE.SchwessingerB.LiuZ.SimpfendorferS.et al (2019). Transposon-mediated horizontal transfer of the host-specific virulence protein toxa between three fungal wheat.mBio10:e01515-19.
74
McLoughlinA. G.WytinckN.WalkerP. L.GirardI. J.RashidK. Y.De KievitT.et al (2018). Identification and application of exogenous DsRNA confers plant protection against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea.Sci. Rep.8:7320.
75
MiaoV. P.CovertS. F.Van EttenH. D. (1991). A fungal gene for antibiotic resistance on a dispensable (“. B “) Chromosome.Science2541773–1776. 10.1126/science.1763326
76
MiaoV. P. W.Van EttenH. D. (1992). Three genes for metabolism of the phytoalexin maackiain in the plant pathogen nectria haematococca?: meiotic instability and relationship to a new gene for pisatin demethylase.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.58801–808. 10.1128/aem.58.3.801-808.1992
77
MorrisseyJ. P.WubbenJ. P.OsbournA. E. (2000). Stagonospora avenae secretes multiple enzymes that hydrolyze oat leaf saponins.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.131041–1052. 10.1094/mpmi.2000.13.10.1041
78
NazlyaN.KnowlesaC. J.BeardsmorebA. J.NaylorbW. T.CorcoranbE. G. (1983). Detoxification of cyanide by immobilised fungi.J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.33B119–126. 10.1002/jctb.280330207
79
OkaK.OkuboA.KodamaM. (2006). Detoxification of a -tomatine by tomato pathogens Alternaria alternata tomato pathotype and corynespora cassiicola and its role in infection.Fungal Genet. Biol.72152–158. 10.1007/s10327-005-0262-8
80
OkmenB.EtaloD. W.JoostenM. H. A. J.BouwmeesterH. J.De VosR. C. H.De WitP. J. G. M. (2013). Detoxification of a -tomatine by cladosporium fulvum is required for full virulence on tomato Er O.New Phytol.1981203–1214. 10.1111/nph.12208
81
OsbournA. (1996). Saponins and plant defence - a soap story.Trends Plant Sci.14–9. 10.1016/s1360-1385(96)80016-1
82
OsbournA.BowyerP.LunnessP.ClarkeB.DanielsM. (1995). Fungal pathogens of oat roots and tomato leaves employ closely related enzymes to detoxify different host plant saponins.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.8971–978. 10.1094/mpmi-8-0971
83
PachecoT.FassinaH.UdZ.DiasI.ViniciusJ.Rodrigues-filhoE. (2018). Bioorganic Chemistry conjugation of antifungal benzoic acid derivatives as a path for detoxi Fi Cation in Penicillium brasilianum, an endophyte from melia azedarach.Bioorg. Chem.81367–372. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.08.038
84
PaoS. S.PaulsenI. T.SaierM. H. (1998). Major facilitator superfamily.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.621–34.
85
PedrasM. S. C.AbdoliA. (2017). Pathogen inactivation of cruciferous phytoalexins: detoxification reactions, enzymes and inhibitors.RSC Adv.723633–23646. 10.1039/c7ra01574g
86
PedrasM. S. C.AhiahonuP. W. K. (2005). Metabolism and detoxification of phytoalexins and analogs by phytopathogenic fungi.Phytochemistry66391–411. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.12.032
87
PedrasM. S. C.AhiahonuP. W. K.HossainM. (2004). Detoxification of the cruciferous phytoalexin brassinin in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum requires an inducible glucosyltransferase.Phytochemistry652685–2694. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.08.033
88
PedrasM. S. C.GadagiR. S.JhaM.Sarma-mamillapalleV. K. (2007). Detoxification of the phytoalexin brassinin by isolates of Leptosphaeria maculans pathogenic on brown mustard involves an inducible hydrolase.Phytochemistry681572–1578. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.03.020
89
PedrasM. S. C.HossainM. (2006). Metabolism of crucifer phytoalexins in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: detoxification of strongly antifungal compounds involves glucosylation †.Org. Biomol. Chem.42581–2590. 10.1039/b604400j
90
PedrasM. S. C.HossainS.SnitynskyR. B. (2011). Phytochemistry detoxification of cruciferous phytoalexins in Botrytis cinerea?: spontaneous dimerization of a camalexin metabolite.Phytochemistry72199–206. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.11.018
91
PedrasM. S. C.MinicZ.JhaM. (2008). Brassinin Oxidase, a fungal detoxifying enzyme to overcome a plant defense – purification, characterization and inhibition.FEBS J.2753691–3705. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06513.x
92
PedrasM. S. C.MinicZ.Sarma-mamillapalleV. K. (2009). Substrate specificity and inhibition of brassinin hydrolases, detoxifying enzymes from the plant pathogens Leptosphaeria maculans and Alternaria brassicicola.FEBS J.2767412–7428. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07457.x
93
PerrinD. R.BottomleyW. (1961). Pisatin: an antifungal substance from pisum sativum L.Nature19176–77. 10.1038/191076a0
94
PetraschS.SilvaC. J.Mesquida-pesciS. D.GallegosK.Van Den AbeeleC.PapinV.et al (2019). Infection strategies deployed by Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium Acuminatum, and rhizopus stolonifer as a function of tomato fruit ripening stage.Front. Plant Sci.10:223. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00223
95
PeyraudR.MbengueM.BarbacciA.RaffaeleS. (2019). Intercellular cooperation in a fungal plant pathogen facilitates host colonization.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1163193–3201. 10.1073/pnas.1811267116
96
QuiddeT.PeterB. (1999). Evidence for three different specific saponin-detoxifying activities in Botrytis cinerea and cloning and functional analysis of a gene coding for a putative avenacinase.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.105273–283.
97
RanjanA.WestrickN. M.JainS.PiotrowskiJ. S.RanjanM.KessensR.et al (2019). Resistance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soybean involves a reprogramming of the phenylpropanoid pathway and Up-Regulation of Antifungal activity targeting ergosterol biosynthesis.Plant Biotechnol. J.171567–1581. 10.1111/pbi.13082
98
ReimannS.DeisingH. B. (2005). Inhibition of efflux transporter-mediated fungicide resistance in pyrenophora tritici-repentis by a derivative of 4’-Hydroxyflavone and enhancement of fungicide activity.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.713269–3275. 10.1128/aem.71.6.3269-3275.2005
99
RichardsT. A.SoanesD. M.JonesM. D. M.VasievaO.LeonardG.PaszkiewicsK.et al (2011). Horizontal gene transfer facilitated the evolution of plant parasitic mechanisms in the oomycetes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10815258–15263. 10.1073/pnas.1105100108
100
Roldán-arjonaT.Pérez-espinosaA.Ruiz-rubioM. (1999). Tomatinase from Fusarium oxysporum f. Sp. lycopersici defines a new class of saponinases.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.12852–861. 10.1094/mpmi.1999.12.10.852
101
RoohparvarR.De WaardM. A.KemaG. H. J.ZwiersL. (2007). MgMfs1, a major facilitator superfamily transporter from the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola, is a strong protectant against natural toxic compounds and fungicides.Fungal Genet. Biol.44378–388. 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.09.007
102
RosaC.KuoY.WuriyanghanH.FalkB. W. (2018). RNA interference mechanisms and applications in plant pathology.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.56581–610. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-050044
103
SandrockR. W.Van EttenH. D. (2001). The relevance of tomatinase activity in pathogens of tomato?: disruption of the B2 -Tomatinase Gene in Colletotrichum Coccodes and Septoria Lycopersici and Heterologous Expression of the Septoria Lycopersici B2 -Tomatinase in Nectria Haematococca, a pathogen of tomato fruit.Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.58159–171. 10.1006/pmpp.2001.0324
104
SanglardD.IscherF.MonodM.BillelJ. (1997). Cloning of candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene.Microbiology143(Pt 2), 405–416. 10.1099/00221287-143-2-405
105
SanzaniS. M.De GirolamoA.SchenaL.SolfrizzoM.IppolitoA.ViscontiA. (2009). Control of Penicillium expansum and patulin accumulation on apples by quercetin and umbelliferone.Eur. Food Res. Technol.228381–389. 10.1007/s00217-008-0944-5
106
SchaferW.StraneyD.CiuffettiL.Van EttenH. D.YoderO. C. (1989). One enzyme makes a fungal pathogen, but not a saprophyte, virulent on a new host plant.Science246247–249. 10.1126/science.246.4927.247
107
SchoonbeekH.Del SorboG.de WaardM. A. (2001). The ABC transporter BcatrB affects the sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea to the phytoalexin resveratrol and the fungicide fenpiclonil.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.14562–571. 10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.4.562
108
SchoonbeekH.NistelrooyJ.de WaardM. (2003). Functional analysis of ABC transporter genes from Botrytis cinerea identifies BcatrB as a transporter of eugenol.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.1091003–1011. 10.1023/b:ejpp.0000003936.61182.14
109
SchoutenA.MaksimovaO.Cuesta-ArenasY.Van Den BergG.RaaijmakersJ. M. (2008). Involvement of the ABC transporter BcAtrB and the Laccase BcLCC2 in defence of Botrytis cinerea against the broad-spectrum antibiotic 2,4- Diacetylphloroglucinol.Environ. Microbiol.101145–1157. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01531.x
110
SchoutenA.WagemakersL.StefanatoF. L.Van Der KaaijR. M.Van KanJ. A. L. (2002). Resveratrol acts as a natural profungicide and induces self-intoxication by a specific laccase.Mol. Microbiol.43883–894. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02801.x
111
SeifbarghiS.BorhanM. H.WeiY.CoutuC.RobinsonS. J.HegedusD. D. (2017). Changes in the Sclerotinia sclerotiorum transcriptome during infection of Brassica napus.BMC Genomics18:266. 10.1186/s12864-017-3642-5
112
SellamA.PoupardP.SimoneauP. (2006). Molecular cloning of abgst1 encoding a glutathione transferase differentially expressed during exposure of Alternaria brassicicola to Isothiocyanates.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.258241–249. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00223.x
113
SemighiniC. P.MarinsM.GoldmanM. H. S.GoldmanG. H. (2002). Quantitative analysis of the relative transcript levels of ABC transporter atr genes in Aspergillus nidulans by real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.681351–1357. 10.1128/aem.68.3.1351-1357.2002
114
ServosJ.HaaseE.BrendelM. (1993). Gene SNQ2 of saccharomyces cerevislae, which confers resistance to 4-Nitroquinoline-N-Oxide and other chemicals, encodes a 169 KDa protein homologous to ATP-Dependent permeases.MGG Mol. Gen. Genet.236214–218. 10.1007/bf00277115
115
SextonA. C.HowlettB. J. (2000). Characterisation of a cyanide hydratase gene in the phytopathogenic fungus Leptosphaeria maculans.Mol. Gen. Genet.263463–470. 10.1007/s004380051190
116
SextonA. C.MinicZ.CozijnsenA. J.PedrasM. S. C.HowlettB. J. (2009). Cloning, purification and characterisation of brassinin glucosyltransferase, a phytoalexin-detoxifying enzyme from the plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.Fungal Genet. Biol.46201–209. 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.10.014
117
ShahiP.Moye-RowleyW. S. (2009). Coordinate control of lipid composition and drug transport activities is required for normal multidrug resistance in fungi.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1794852–859. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.12.012
118
ShimizuJ.UeharaM.WatanabeM. (1982). Transformation of terpenoids in grape must by Botrytis cinerea.Agric. Biol. Chem.461339–1344. 10.1271/bbb1961.46.1339
119
SmithD. A.HarrerJ. M.ClevelandT. E. (1982). Relation between production of extracellular kievitone hydratase by isolates of Fusarium and their pathogenicity on Phaseolus vulgaris.Phytopathology721319–1323. 10.1094/phyto-72-1319
120
SmithD. A.WheelerH. E.BanksS. W.ClevelandT. E. (1984). Association between lowered kievitone hydratase activity and reduced virulence to bean in Variants of Fusarium solani f. Sp. Phaseoli.Physiol. Plant Pathol.25135–147. 10.1016/0048-4059(84)90052-3
121
StefanatoF. L.Abou-MansourE.BuchalaA.KretschmerM.MosbachA.HahnM.et al (2009). The ABC transporter BcatrB from Botrytis cinerea exports camalexin and is a virulence factor on Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J.58499–510. 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03794.x
122
StergiopoulosI.ZwiersL.De WaardM. A. (2003). The ABC transporter MgAtr4 Is a virulence factor of Mycosphaerella graminicola that affects colonization of substomatal cavities in wheat leaves.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.16689–698. 10.1094/mpmi.2003.16.8.689
123
TenhakenR.SalmenH. C.BarzW. (1991). Purification and characterization of pterocarpan hydroxylase, a flavoprotein monooxygenase from the fungus ascochyta rabid involved in pterocarpan phytoalexin metabolism.Arch. Microbiol.155353–359.
124
TikuA. R. (2020). “Antimicrobial Compounds (Phytoanticipins and Phytoalexins) and their role in plant defense,” inCo-Evolution of Secondary Metabolites, edsMerillonJ. M.RamawatK. G. (Berlin: Springer International Publishing), 845–868. 10.1007/978-3-319-96397-6_63
125
TranchimandS.ErtelG.GaydouV.GaudinC.TronT.IacazioC. (2008). Biochemical and molecular characterization of a quercetinase from Penicillium olsonii.Biochimie90781–789. 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.12.004
126
TurbekC. S.SmithD. A.SchardlC. L. (1992). An extracellular enzyme from Fusarium solani f. Sp. phaseoli which catalyses hydration of the isoflavonoid phytoalexin, phaseollidin.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.94187–190. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb05312.x
127
UrbanM.BhargavaT.HamerJ. E. (1999). An ATP-Driven Efflux pump is a novel pathogenicity factor in rice blast disease.EMBO J.18512–521. 10.1093/emboj/18.3.512
128
Van EttenH. D.MansfieldJ. W.BaileyJ. A.FarmerE. E. (1994). Two classes of plant antibiotics: phytoalexins versus “Phytoanticipins”.Plant Cell61191–1192. 10.2307/3869817
129
Van EttenH. D.MatthewsD. E.MatthewsP. S. (1989). Phytoalexin detoxification?: importance for pathogenicity and practical implications.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.27143–164. 10.1146/annurev.py.27.090189.001043
130
Van EttenH. D.SmithD. A. (1975). Accumulation of antifungal isoflavonoids and in bean tissue infected with Fusarium solanif. Sp. Phaseoli.Physiol. Plant Pathol.5225–237. 10.1016/0048-4059(75)90089-2
131
Vela-corcíaD.SrivastavaD. A.Dafa-bergerA.RotemN.BardaO.LevyM. (2019). MFS transporter from Botrytis cinerea provides tolerance to glucosinolate-breakdown products and is required for pathogenicity.Nat. Commun.10:2886.
132
WadkeN.KandasamyD.VogelH.LahL.WingB. D.PaetzC.et al (2016). The bark-beetle-associated fungus, endoconidiophora polonica, utilizes the phenolic defense compounds of its host as a carbon source.Plant Physiol.171914–931.
133
WangL.XuM.LiuC.WangJ.XiH.WuB.et al (2013). Resveratrols in grape berry skins and leaves in vitis germplasm.PLoS One8:e0061642. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061642
134
WangP.SandrockR. W.Van EttenH. D. (1999). Disruption of the cyanide hydratase gene in Gloeocercospora Sorghi Increases its sensitivity to the phytoanticipin cyanide but does not affect its pathogenicity on the cyanogenic plant sorghum.Fungal Genet. Biol.28126–134.
135
WangP.Van EttenH. D. (1992). Cloning and properties of a cyanide hydratase gene from the phytopathogenic fungus Gloeocercospora sorghi.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.1871048–1054.
136
WangY.LimL.DiguistiniS.RobertsonG.BreuilC. (2012). A specialized ABC efflux transporter GcABC-G1 confers monoterpene resistance to Grosmannia clavigera, a bark beetle-associated fungal pathogen of pine trees.New Phytol.197886–898.
137
WangY.LimL.MadilaoL.LahL.BohlmannJ.BreuilC. (2014). Gene discovery for enzymes involved in limonene modification or utilization by the mountain pine beetle-associated pathogen Grosmannia clavigera.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.804566–4576.
138
WatanabeM.SumidaN.YanaiK.MurakamiT. (2004). A novel saponin hydrolase from Neocosmospora vasinfecta Var. Vasinfecta.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70865–872.
139
WeiW.Pierre-pierreN.PengH.EllurV.VandemarkG. J.ChenW. (2020). The D-Galacturonic acid catabolic pathway genes differentially regulate virulence and salinity response in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.Fungal Genet. Biol.145:103482.
140
WeltringK.MackenbrockK.BarzW. (1982). Demethylation, methylation and 3’-hydroxylation of isoflavones Bv Fusarium Fungi.Z. Naturforsc.37570–574.
141
WeltringK. M.WesselsJ.GeyerR. (1997). Metabolism of the potato saponins a-chaconine and a-solanine by Gibberella Pilicaris.Phytochemistry461005–1009.
142
WestlakeD. W. S.RoxburghJ. M.TalbotG. (1961). Microbial production of carbon monoxide from flavonoids.Nature189510–511.
143
WestrickN. M.RanjanA.JainS.GrauC. R.SmithD. L.KabbageM. (2019). Gene regulation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum during infection of glycine max: on the road to pathogenesis.BMC Genomics20:157. 10.1186/s12864-019-5517-4
144
WubbenJ. P.PriceK. R.DanielsM. J.OsbournA. E. (1996). Detoxification of oat leaf saponins by septoria avenae.Phytopathology86986–992.
145
ZhangL.ThiewesH.Van KanJ. A. L. (2011). The D -Galacturonic acid catabolic pathway in Botrytis cinerea.Fungal Genet. Biol.48990–997.
146
ZhangL.van KanJ. A. L. (2013). Botrytis cinerea mutants deficient in d-galacturonic acid catabolism have a perturbed virulence on Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis, but Not on Tomato.Mol. Plant Pathol.1419–29.
147
ZwiersL.StergiopoulosI.GielkensM. M. C.GoodallS. D.de WaardM. A. (2003). ABC transporters of the wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola function as protectants against biotic and xenobiotic toxic compounds.Mol. Gen. Genom.269499–507.
Summary
Keywords
detoxification, necrotrophy, fungal pathogen, phytoalexin, phytoanticipin
Citation
Westrick NM, Smith DL and Kabbage M (2021) Disarming the Host: Detoxification of Plant Defense Compounds During Fungal Necrotrophy. Front. Plant Sci. 12:651716. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.651716
Received
10 January 2021
Accepted
26 March 2021
Published
30 April 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Antonieta De Cal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Spain
Reviewed by
Morifumi Hasegawa, Ibaraki University, Japan; Chhana Ullah, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Germany
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Westrick, Smith and Kabbage.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mehdi Kabbage, kabbage@wisc.edu
This article was submitted to Plant Pathogen Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.