Abstract
Estuarine wetlands are highly heterogeneous due to strong interactions between freshwater input and seawater intrusion. However, little is known about how clonal plant populations adapt to heterogeneous salinity in soil environments. In the present study, the effects of clonal integration on Phragmites australis populations under salinity heterogeneity were studied using field experiments with 10 treatments in the Yellow River Delta. Clonal integration significantly increased plant height, aboveground biomass, underground biomass, root–shoot ratio, intercellular CO2 concentration, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and stem Na+ content under homogeneous treatment. Under the heterogeneous salt treatment, clonal integration significantly affected total aboveground and underground biomass, photosynthetic traits, and stem Na+ content under different salt gradients. The increase in salt concentration inhibited the physiological activity and growth of P. australis to varying degrees. Compared with the heterogeneous saline environment, clonal integration was more beneficial to P. australis populations in the homogeneous saline habitat. The results of the present study suggest that P. australis prefers homogeneous saline habitats; however, plants can adapt to heterogeneous salinity conditions via clonal integration.
1 Introduction
Soil heterogeneity is prevalent in natural habitats and exists at a fine scale (; ; ; ); soil heterogeneity can also enhance plant growth or reproduction through plasticity in root growth or physiological changes, and facilitate efficient use of unevenly distributed resources, based on greenhouse or garden studies (; ). For example, observed that nutrient heterogeneity significantly enhanced the morphological traits (plant height and number of ramets, spacers, and length) and biomass accumulation of Typha orientalis Presal (). also observed a similar phenomenon: when compared with those in the homogeneous environment, Iris japonica biomass, ramet number and rhizome length increased in different degrees within large patch heterogeneous areas (). However, we observed contrasting results in our previous study, with Phragmites australis preferring homogeneous nutrient conditions in a saline micro-environment, based on a split-root experiment (). So far, the responses of different plants to environmental heterogeneity have mostly been conducted based on pot experiments at the individual scale (; ; ). However, the adaptation of plants to environmental heterogeneity at the population scale has rarely been studied.
In estuarine wetlands, climate change, human activity, storm surge inundation, and the interaction of terrestrial and marine environments all jointly introduce both resource and stressor heterogeneity (; ; ). The different degrees of spatial heterogeneity in environmental factors present a major challenge for plant growth and survival (; ; ). In estuarine wetlands, soil heterogeneity and high soil salinity limit the growth of most plants and vegetation is mainly composed of salt-tolerant species (). Clonal plants account for a substantial proportion of such species, considering their unique adaptation strategies to heterogeneous wetland environments, through the production of genetically identical individual subunits via clonal growth (). Clonal integration, also referred to as physiological integration, is a unique feature via which clonal plants adapt to adverse environments by sharing resources among connected ramets (). Numerous studies have demonstrated that clonal plants can adjust the biomass of the resource-acquiring organs to high nutrition areas in nutrient heterogeneous environments (; ; ; ). At present, research on the adaptation of clonal plants to heterogeneous environments has mostly focused on nutrients (), water (), and light (), with relatively little research focusing on the heterogeneity of coastal wetland vegetation under stress factors such as salinity.
P. australis is a typical salt-tolerant clonal plant with high soil salinity tolerance and the capacity to survive extreme salinity environments (; ; ). In heterogeneous habitats, P. australis can adjust the sizes of resource-acquisition organs (such as the length and diameter of roots and rhizomes), the distribution and number of ramets, and other morphological indicators (such as shoot diameter, plant height, and leaf area) to cope with resource heterogeneity (; ; ; ). However, whether P. australis could colonize unfavorable habitats through clonal integration when compared to non-clonal individuals is still unclear. Moreover, studies on the effect of salinity heterogeneity on P. australis under different salinity levels could enhance our understanding of the adaptive mechanisms of clonal plants in heterogeneous saline habitats.
To investigate the effects of clonal integration on plant communities under different stress conditions, which could further provide a theoretical basis for the ecological restoration of coastal wetlands, we conducted a study on P. australis in different salinity environments in a typical estuarine wetland of the Yellow River Delta. Field control experiments were conducted on P. australis and the effects of clonal integration of P. australis populations in different homogeneous and heterogeneous salinity environments were tested. Specifically, the following two questions were addressed: (1) Does severance decrease P. australis growth and physiological traits in saline homogeneous and heterogeneous habitats? And (2) if so, do the effects increase with an increase in salt stress?
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental design
The study was conducted at the Yellow River Delta Ecology Research Station of Coastal Wetlands, Shandong, China (37° 45′ 50″ N, 118° 59′ 24″ E), which is located in the Nature Reserve of the Yellow River Delta. P. australis stands with uniform patches were selected as the experimental blocks. Forty circular plots (PVC pipes), with 40 cm diameter and 40 cm height, were randomly located within the blocks, with an at least 1-m interval between PVC pipes to minimize interference between treatments. To ensure that all the plots (PVC pipes) were at the same starting level and avoid interference by plants outside the plots, a narrow trench 30 cm deep was dug around the perimeter of each plot and the PVC pipes were inserted into the trenches, so that all the pipes extended 30 cm below and 10 cm above the soil surface, filling the trench and enclosing the plots (Figure 1). Before the experiment started, the aboveground part of the P. australis community was cut to ensure uniform growth, and about 15 cm of shoot was retained.
Figure 1
The experiment consisted of three factors: severed treatment (rhizomes either severed in the middle of the plot to prevent clonal integration or left connected), salt level, and salt homogeneity/heterogeneous treatment, including ten treatments with four replicates in a completely randomized design. For the severed treatment, a PVC plate (40 cm wide, 40 cm high) was inserted in the PVC pot and sealed with glass glue to prevent mixing of the salt solutions. For the connected treatment, a PVC plate (40 cm wide, 15cm high) with 5 cm below (taking care not to sever rhizomes) and 10 cm above the soil surface was inserted (Figure 1). In three homogeneous salt treatments, both halves of the pot were exposed to the same NaCl concentrations (0%, 1%, or 2%, marked with 0%/0%, 1%/1%, and 2%/2%, respectively), and in two heterogeneous salt treatments, one side was exposed to high NaCl concentration (2% or 3%), and the other to low NaCl concentration (0% or 1%), which were labeled as 2%/0% and 3%/1%, respectively.
The plants started to be watered on 1st June 2020 with different concentrations of NaCl solution (two halves received the same amount of solution) after 10 days of recovery. About a week later, the soil salt concentrations reached the desired treatment levels. To maintain the salt concentrations, water lost to evaporation loss was made up every three or four days, and to avoid significant changes in salt concentrations, a portable electrical conductivity meter was used to monitor the salt concentration every week and the soil salt concentration was adjusted with NaCl solution.
2.2 Data collection
The experiment lasted four months and measurement of photosynthetic traits was performed in sunny weather at 8:00-11:30 and 14:00-17:00 on 15th September 2020. P. australis leaves with similar growth were selected in each half. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr) of leaves under saturated light were measured using the TARGAS-1 portable photosynthetic apparatus (PP Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA). Plant height, number of ramets, number of leaves, leaf width and length, stem diameter, and internode length in each half were measured. The third or fourth fully expanded leaves from the top were selected for the leaf length and width measurements. After the experiments, the P. australis plants were divided into aboveground and underground parts. In the case of aboveground parts, the leaves and stems (naked stems and leaf sheaths included) were collected separately, and the rhizomes and adventitious roots in each half pot with a depth of 30 cm (the main root layer of P. australis) were collected as underground parts. The plant samples were oven-dried at 105 °C for 15 min, then dried at 60 °C to constant weight, and the dry weight was recorded. The concentrations of Na+ and K+ in P. australis stem and leaf were measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AA = 6800, Shimadzu, Japan). Proline content in leaves was determined using a 722 spectrophotometer (Shanghai Precision & Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 520 nm.
2.3 Statistical analysis
Two-way analysis of variance was used to test the effects of clonal integration (severance vs. no severance) and salinity level (0%/0%, 1%/1%, and 2%/2%) in a homogeneous salt environment, the effects of clonal integration (severance vs. no severance) and salt level (2%/0% and 3%/1%) in a heterogeneous salt environment, and the effects of salt heterogeneity and salt level (1%/1%, 2%/2%, 2%/0%, and 3%/1%) on the aboveground and underground biomass, plant growth (plant height, number of leaves, stem diameter, root-shoot ratio), and physiological traits (photosynthesis, Na+ and K+ content in leaves and stems, and leaf proline content) of P. australis. Differences in plant growth and physiological traits between severed and intact treatments of the same salinity level were assessed using t-tests. Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) at a 0.05 level of significance.
3 Results
3.1 Plant growth
In general, plant height, leaf length, and stem diameter decreased significantly with increasing salt stress (p < 0.05, Table 1). Under homogeneous conditions, the severed treatment significantly decreased plant height in the salt-free treatment; however, no significant differences were observed among other plant growth traits, such as stem diameter, leaf length, leaf width, and internode length (p > 0.05).
Table 1
| Traits | Salt treatment | Severed treatment | Salt × Severed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative density growth rate | 2.149 | 2.808 | 0.291 |
| Plant height | 13.007** | 0.897** | 0.208 |
| Leaf length | 5.402* | 1.476 | 1.647 |
| Leaf width | 0.533 | 0.156 | 2.117 |
| Number of leaves | 0.125 | 3.125 | 0.875 |
| Internode length | 5.390* | 1.105 | 1.977 |
| Stem diameter | 5.145* | 4.772 | 0.001 |
| Total underground biomass | 45.270*** | 30.086*** | 11.477* |
| Total aboveground biomass | 87.917*** | 6.644* | 0.239 |
| Root-shoot ratio | 6.430* | 12.881** | 3.265 |
| Pn | 13.630** | 13.638** | 4.143* |
| Ci | 11.785** | 2.447 | 2.656 |
| Gs | 13.196** | 5.536* | 1.592 |
| Tr | 7.969** | 50.013*** | 8.307** |
| Na-stem | 59.385*** | 15.125** | 0.307 |
| Na-leaf | 24.976*** | 0.435 | 0.024 |
| K-stem | 3.155 | 2.457 | 0.333 |
| K-leaf | 0.408 | 0.382 | 0.704 |
| Proline | 10.150** | 0.521 | 2.096 |
Two-way ANOVAs for the effects of the salt and severed treatments on plant growth and physiological traits of Phragmites australis with homogeneous salt treatments (0%/0%, 1%/1%, and 2%/2%).
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Bold value means the trait was significantly affected by the treatment.
In the heterogeneous salt environment, the salt and severed treatment affected some growth traits of P. australis significantly (Figure 2). With an increase in salt stress, plant height decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Severed treatment significantly decreased plant height in the 2%/0% treatment (p < 0.05). With an increase in salt stress (3%/1% treatment), leaf length in P. australis of the intact group was significantly higher than that in the severed group (p < 0.05, Figure 2). However, the interaction of the salt and severed treatment did not significantly influence plant growth traits (p > 0.05, Figure 2, Table 2).
Figure 2
Table 2
| Traits | Salt treatment | Severed treatment | Salt × Severed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative density growth rate | 0.070 | 0.862 | 0.862 |
| Plant height | 8.630** | 0.590 | 0.862 |
| Leaf length | 0.062 | 1.389 | 1.689 |
| Leaf width | 0.025 | 7.351* | 0.314 |
| Number of leaves | 1.316 | 2.579 | 2.579 |
| Internode length | 0.724 | 1.345 | 0.016 |
| Stem diameter | 0.618 | 1.556 | 0.063 |
| Total underground biomass | 0.003 | 16.969*** | 0.004 |
| Total aboveground biomass | 2.587 | 14.132*** | 0.455 |
| Root-shoot ratio | 0.103 | 2.955 | 0.293 |
| Pn | 6.722* | 15.375*** | 0.441 |
| Ci | 17.341*** | 2.753 | 0.041 |
| Gs | 1.116 | 1.695 | 0.092 |
| Tr | 11.266** | 16.129*** | 0.169 |
| Na-stem | 5.186* | 36.398*** | 3.067 |
| Na-leaf | 0.502 | 10.386** | 0.561 |
| K-stem | 0.278 | 0.242 | 0.381 |
| K-leaf | 1.294 | 1.814 | 3.212 |
| Proline | 6.606* | 3.506 | 0.000 |
Two-way ANOVAs for the effects of the salt and severed treatments on plant growth and physiological traits of Phragmites australis with heterogeneous salt treatments (2%/0% and 3%/1%).
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Bold value means the trait was significantly affected by the treatment.
3.2 Biomass allocation
The salt and severed treatment significantly decreased the total aboveground biomass, total underground biomass, and root-shoot ratio of P. australis (p < 0.05, Figure 3, Table 1). Under homogeneous conditions, the severed treatment significantly decreased the total underground biomass in the salt-free treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 3, Table 1); however, the aboveground biomass did not exhibit significant difference between the severed and the intact treatments.
Figure 3
Under heterogeneous salt conditions, the severed treatment significantly decreased the underground and aboveground biomass in both the 2%/0% and 3%/1% treatments (p < 0.05, Table 2). Moreover, the biomass (aboveground and underground) in the 1%/1% homogeneous salt treatment was significantly higher than that in the 2%/0% heterogeneous salt treatment (p < 0.05), and the aboveground biomass and the root-shoot ratio were affected significantly by the interaction of salt concentration and salt heterogeneity (Table 3).
Table 3
| Traits | Salt concentration | Salt heterogeneity | SC × SH |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative density growth rate | 0.984 | 0.444 | 0.093 |
| Plant height | 1.248 | 3.014 | 0.056 |
| Leaf length | 2.197 | 0.267 | 0.361 |
| Leaf width | 0.068 | 2.600 | 0.003 |
| Number of leaves | 4.392 | 0.275 | 1.098 |
| Internode length | 0.159 | 1.105 | 0.040 |
| Stem diameter | 0.348 | 1.232 | 0.11 |
| Total underground biomass | 3.410 | 12.366** | 0.161 |
| Total aboveground biomass | 12.175** | 24.856*** | 6.707* |
| Root-shoot ratio | 0.795 | 1.527 | 9.666** |
| Pn | 8.617* | 5.524* | 0.015 |
| Ci | 3.888 | 0.189 | 1.721 |
| Gs | 1.422 | 0.017 | 0.439 |
| Tr | 12.260** | 0.239 | 0.071 |
| Na-stem | 8.005* | 0.181 | 0.001 |
| Na-leaf | 4.976* | 0.657 | 1.624 |
| K-stem | 0.079 | 1.855 | 0.046 |
| K-leaf | 0.557 | 0.039 | 0.557 |
| Proline | 6.048* | 0.001 | 0.074 |
Two-way ANOVAs for the effects of salt concentration (SC) and salt heterogeneity (SH) on plant growth and physiological traits of Phragmites australis with different salt treatments (1%/1%, 2%/2%, 2%/0%, and 3%/1%).
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Bold value means the trait was significantly affected by the treatment.
3.3 Physiological trait
Pn, Gs, and Tr were significantly affected by the salt and severed treatments (p < 0.05, Figure 4, Table 1). In the homogeneous environment, severed treatment significantly decreased Pn and Tr under the salt-free condition, and Tr in 1%/1% salt treatment (p < 0.01, Figure 4). Under heterogeneous salt conditions, severed treatment significantly decreased the Pn and Tr in both 2%/0% treatment and 3%/1% treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 4). In addition, heterogeneous salt treatment significantly affected Pn when compared with the homogeneous salt treatment (p < 0.05, Table 3).
Figure 4
The proline content in leaves of P. australis was significantly increased by salt treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 5) in the homogeneous treatment, but was not affected by the severed treatment, even though the proline content was higher in the severed treatment (p>0.05, Table 1). No significant differences were observed between the homogeneous treatment and heterogeneous treatment (p > 0.05, Figure 5, Table 3).
Figure 5
Salt treatment significantly increased stem and leaf Na+ content in both the homogeneous and heterogeneous environments (p < 0.001, Figure 6, Table 1). Severed treatment significantly decreased stem and leaf Na+ contents (p < 0.01, Figure 6, Table 2). However, salt stress and severed treatment did not affect stem and leaf K+ contents of P. australis significantly (p > 0.05, Figure 6, Table 1, 2), and a heterogeneous salt environment had no significant effects on the stem and leaf Na+ and K+ contents (Table 3).
Figure 6
4 Discussion
Among the environmental factors in coastal wetlands, salt is one of the major stress factors influencing plant growth and productivity (; ). In the present study, salt treatment significantly affected the growth of P. australis. With an increase in salt stress, plant performance decreased significantly, which has also been demonstrated by previous findings where salt stress significantly inhibited the number of stem nodes, plant height, leaf length, and leaf area in P. australis (; ; ), the growth potential of strawberry leaves (; ), and the tiller number, bud number, and rhizome length of Leymus chinensis (). However, in heterogeneous salinity environments, different types of plants have developed different salt adaptation mechanisms in the course of evolution; previous studies have demonstrated that clonal plants have a unique environmental adaptation mechanism through clonal integration (; ). Several studies have demonstrated that with the connections among ramets, clonal fragments can translocate resources and signals between ramets and increase the performance of the whole plant when exposed to a heterogeneous environment (; ; ). In the present study, P. australis plant height in the severed treatment decreased significantly in the 0%/0% group and the 2%/0% heterogeneous salt treatment group. The relative density growth rate, plant height, leaf number, stem diameter, leaf length, and leaf width of P. australis exhibited a decreasing trend under the severed treatment, although the differences were not significant. Moreover, the aboveground biomass and underground biomass were affected significantly by severed treatment (Table 1, 2). The results resolved our first question and demonstrated that clonal integration could alleviate the negative effects of salt stress on plants by increasing P. australis growth in saline environments. It could be explained that when clonal plants are in a stressful environment, they can balance stress factors (such as salt stress) and minimize the negative effects of the stress environment through clone integration (; ; ).
Photosynthesis intensity is one of the key factors influencing plant metabolism, growth, and stress tolerance (). Environmental stresses (such as salt) could also affect plant photosynthesis by causing stomatal closure or damaging the photosynthetic structure and function (). In the present study, the Pn, Ci, Gs, and Tr of P. australis decreased significantly with an increase in salt stress. However, the Pn and Tr of P. australis were higher with than without ramet connection under the salt-free and heterogeneous salt treatments (2%/0% and 3%/1%). The results indicated that the photosynthesis parameters of P. australis were negatively affected by salt stress, but clonal integration could minimize the negative effects of heterogeneous salt stress (). Conversely, higher photosynthetic capacities could support resource acquisition for plant growth and population expansion in heterogeneous environments (; ).
In saline environments, compatible osmolytes, such as proline, have been shown to be fundamental in osmo-tolerance (; ). Such osmolytes, as well as other compounds, accumulate under environmental stress, such as salt stress or water stress, to alleviate the negative effects, and are found at high concentrations in plants adapted to dry or saline soils (; ; ). Similarly, in the present study, salt treatment significantly increased leaf proline content, even under the heterogeneous salt treatment conditions. The results indicated that connected ramets may reduce salt stress through clonal integration. also observed that leaf proline in the progeny after severing increased when compared with that in the progeny connected to the mother plant (). Other studies have also demonstrated that osmotic regulation is often coupled with reduced growth, which facilitates plant survival under salt stress (; ). In the present study, the aboveground biomass in the severed treatment was lower than that in the intact group with the same heterogeneous salt treatment (such as the 2%/0% treatment); however, leaf proline content was higher in severed treatment.
Although stem and leaf Na+ concentrations in P. australis showed significant increases under salt stress in the present study, the modest alteration of Na+ concentration across a range of external Na+ concentrations indicated a superior capacity of P. australis to restrict Na+ uptake efficiently, which was also demonstrated by and in our previous study (). The capacity of plants to control salt concentration in tissues via reduced root uptake is a key mechanism that allows plant survival and growth under salt stress (). Notably, in the present study, clonal integration significantly increased stem and leaf Na+ accumulation in P. australis growing in the lower salt concentration patches, which were most likely imported from the connected ramets growing in the higher salt concentration patches. The results indicated that clonal integration could not only increase the concentration of nutrients, such as nitrogen, but also increase the contents of some ions, such as Na+, to a certain extent, and balance the salt ion concentration in the entire plant to adapt to the osmotic stress and ion toxicity, and, in turn, the external heterogeneous salt environment. Moreover, stem and leaf K+ concentrations showed no significant differences under each salt concentration gradient in the present study. The potential reason could be that the maintenance of K+ in aboveground tissue in the high Na+ environment is of great significance for the maintenance of the relative ion content balance, ensuring relatively normal photosynthesis and accumulating and transporting dry matter. Similar results have been reported in other species (; ; ).
In conclusion, salt treatment affected P. australis growth significantly. However, salt heterogeneity did not have significant effects on morphological traits, but it decreased the aboveground and belowground biomass under 1% total salt concentration. Severed treatment intensified the adverse effects of salinity by decreasing photosynthetic capacity and biomass accumulation. According to the results, clonal plants can adjust their survival strategies in heterogeneous stress environments via morphological plasticity and clonal integration.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
BG, JBY and XZ designed the study. BG and MW conducted the control experiment. MW, XL and DZ carried out the data analysis and wrote the manuscript, and XW, JBY and JSY revised it. BG, XW and JBY coordinated the project. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41871091, 42171111 and U1806218).
Acknowledgments
We thank International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for editing the language in this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AlpertP. (1999). Clonal integration in Fragaria chiloensis differs between populations: ramets from grassland are selfish. Oecologia120 (1), 69–76. doi: 10.1007/s004420050834
2
BeátaO.HubaiA. G. (2014). Patch size and distance: modelling habitat structure from the perspective of clonal growth. Ann. Bot.114 (2), 389–398. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu110
3
BelkheiriO.MulasM. (2013). The effects of salt stress on growth, water relations and ion accumulation in two halophyte Atriplex species. Environ. Exp. Bot.86, 17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.07.001
4
ChenD.AliA.YongX.LinC.NiuX.CaiA.et al. (2019). A multi-species comparison of selective placement patterns of ramets in invasive alien and native clonal plants to light, soil nutrient and water heterogeneity. Sci. Total Environ.657, 1568–1577. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.099
5
ChenJ.LeiN.MingD. (2010). Clonal integration improves the tolerance of Carex praeclara to sand burial by compensatory response. Acta Oecologica36 (1), 23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2009.09.006
6
DingZ.LiuY.LouY.JiangM.LüX. (2021). How soil ion stress and type influence the flooding adaptive strategies of Phragmites australis and Bolboschoenus planiculmis in temperate saline–alkaline wetlands? Sci. Total Environ.771 (3–4), 144654. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144654
7
DongB.AlpertP.ZhangQ.YuF. (2015). Clonal integration in homogeneous environments increases performance of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Oecologia179 (2), 393–403. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3338-y
8
EllerF.SkalovaH.CaplanJ. S.BhattaraiG. P.BurgerM. K.CroninJ. T.et al. (2017). Cosmopolitan species as models for ecophysiological responses to global change: the common reed phragmites australis. Front. Plant Sci.8, 1833. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01833
9
GuanB.GaoN.ChenM.CagleG. A.TianX. (2021). Seedling adaptive characteristics of Phragmites australis to nutrient heterogeneity under salt stress using a split-root approach. Aquat. Sci.83 (3), 56. doi: 10.1007/s00027-021-00811-w
10
GuanB.YuJ.HouA.HanG.WangG.QuF.et al. (2017). The ecological adaptability of Phragmites australis to interactive effects of water level and salt stress in the yellow river delta. Aquat. Ecol.51, 107–116. doi: 10.1007/s10452-016-9602-3
11
HutchingsM. J.WijesingheD. K. (1997). Patchy habitats, division of labour and growth dividends in clonal plants. Trends Ecol. Evol.12, 390–394. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)87382-X
12
KeserL. H.VisserE. J.DawsonW.SongY.YuF.FischerM.et al. (2015). Herbaceous plant species invading natural areas tend to have stronger adaptive root foraging than other naturalized species. Front. Plant Sci.6, 273. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00273
13
KoevoetsI. T.HenkV. J.ElzengaJ.ChristaT. (2016). Roots withstanding their environment: exploiting root system architecture responses to abiotic stress to improve crop tolerance. Front. Plant Sci.7, 1335. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01335
14
LaplanteS. R.FaderL. D.FandrickK. R.FandrickD. R.HuckeO.KemperR.et al. (2011). Assessing atropisomer axial chirality in drug discovery and development. J. Medicinal Chem.54 (20), 7005. doi: 10.1021/jm200584g
15
LiS.GeZ.XieL.ChenW.YuanL.WangD.et al. (2018). Ecophysiological response of native and exotic salt marsh vegetation to waterlogging and salinity: implications for the effects of sea-level rise. Sci. Rep.8, 2441. doi:Â 10.1038/s41598-017-18721-z
16
LiM.GongL.TianQ.HuL.GuoW.KimatuJ. N.et al. (2009). Clonal genetic diversity and populational genetic differentiation in Phragmites australis distributed in the songnen prairie in northeast China as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism and sequence-specific amplification polymorphism. Ann. Appl. Biol.154 (1), 43–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00269.x
17
LiangJ.YuanW.GaoJ.RoiloaS. R.YuF. (2020). Soil resource heterogeneity competitively favors an invasive clonal plant over a native one. Oecologia193 (1), 155–165. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04660-6
18
LiuL.AlpertP.DongB.LiJ.YuF. (2017). Combined effects of soil heterogeneity, herbivory and detritivory on growth of the clonal plant Hydrocotyle vulgaris. Plant Soil421, 429–437. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3476-6
19
LiuL.YinM.GuoX.YuX.SongH.EllerF.et al. (2021). The river shapes the genetic diversity of common reed in the yellow river delta via hydrochory dispersal and habitat selection. Sci. Total Environ.764, 144382. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144382
20
LuH.RrookerR.SongL.LiuW.SackL.ZhangJ.et al. (2020). When facilitation meets clonal integration in forest canopies. New Phytol.225, 135–142. doi: 10.1111/nph.16228
21
MeloniD. A.OlivaM. A.MartinezC. A. (2003). Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot.49, 69–76. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00058-8
22
PagterM.BragatoC.MalagoliM.BrixH. (2009). Osmotic and ionic effects of NaCl and Na2SO4 salinity on Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot.90 (1), 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.05.005
23
SaiedA. S.KeutgenA. J.NogaG. (2005). The influence of NaCl salinity on growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry cvs. ‘Elsanta’ and ‘Korona’. Scientia Hortic.103 (3), 289–303. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.06.015
24
Santa-CruzA.AcostaM.RusA.BolarinM. C. (1999). Short-term salt tolerance mechanisms in differentially salt tolerant tomato species. Plant Physiol. Biochem.37 (1), 65–71. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(99)80068-0
25
SarkerU.ObaS. (2020). The response of salinity stress- induced a. tricolor to growth, anatomy, physiology, non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants. Front. Plant Sci.11, 559876. doi:Â 10.3389/fpls.2020.559876
26
ShenN.LiuC.YuH.QuJ. (2020). Effects of resource heterogeneity and environmental disturbance on the growth performance and interspecific competition of wetland clonal plants. Global Ecol. Conserv.22, e00914. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00914
27
SilvaE. N.SilveiraJ. A. G.RodriguesC. R. F.ViégasR. A. (2015). Physiological adjustment to salt stress in Jatropha curcas is associated with accumulation of salt ions, transport and selectivity of k+, osmotic adjustment and K+/Na+ homeostasis. Plant Biol.17 (5), 1023–1029. doi: 10.1111/plb.12337
28
SunX.ChenY.ZhouN.CuiY.LiF.ZhangM. (2021). Effects of salinity and concomitant species on growth of Phragmites australis populations at different levels of genetic diversity. Sci. total Environ.780, 146516. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146516
29
TabotP. T.AdamsJ. B. (2013). Ecophysiology of salt marsh plants and predicted responses to climate change in south Africa. Ocean Coast. Manage.80, 89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.04.003
30
ThoN.VromantN.HungN. T.HensL. (2008). Soil salinity and sodicity in a shrimp farming coastal area of the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Environ. Geology54 (8), 1739–1746. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0951-z
31
TurhanE.ErisA. (2009). Changes of growth, amino acids, and ionic composition in strawberry plants under salt stress conditions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.40 (21-22), 3308–3322. doi: 10.1080/00103620903325927
32
WangP.AlpertP.YuF. (2021). Physiological integration can increase competitive ability in clonal plants if competition is patchy. Oecologia195 (1), 199–212. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04823-5
33
WangY.Müller-SchärerH.KleunenM. V.CaiA.ZhangP.YanR.et al. (2017). Invasive alien plants benefit more from clonal integration in heterogeneous environments than natives. New Phytol.216 (4), 1072–1078. doi: 10.1111/nph.14820
34
WangY.ShiX.MengX.WuX.LuoF.YuF. (2016). Effects of spatial patch arrangement and scale of covarying resources on growth and intraspecific competition of a clonal plant. Front. Plant Sci.7, 753. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00753
35
WangN.YuF.LiP.HeW.LiuJ. (2008). Clonal integration affects growth, photosynthetic efficiency and biomass allocation, but not the competitive ability, of the alien invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides under severe stress. Ann. Bot.101 (5), 671–678. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn005
36
WangY.ZhangX.ZhangJ.LiS. (2009). Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in a watershed on the loess plateau. Pedosphere19 (4), 486–495. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60141-7
37
WatersE. M.SoiniH. A.NovotnyM. V.WatsonM. A. (2016). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) drive nutrient foraging in the clonal woodland strawberry, fragaria vesca. Plant Soil407 (1-2), 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2934-x
38
XiaoY.TangJ.QingH. (2011). Effects of salinity and clonal integration on growth and sexual reproduction of the invasive grass Spartina alterniflora. Flora206 (8), 736–741. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2010.12.003
39
XiaoY.TangJ.QingH.YanO.ZhaoY.ZhouC.et al. (2010). Clonal integration enhances flood tolerance of Spartina alterniflora daughter ramets. Aquat. Bot.92 (1), 9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2009.09.001
40
XingY.WeiG.LuoF.LiC.DongB.JiJ.et al. (2019). Effects of salinity and clonal integration on the amphibious plant Paspalum paspaloides: growth, photosynthesis and tissue ion regulation. J. Plant Ecol.12 (1), 45–55. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtx061
41
YouW.HanC.LiuC.YuD. (2016). Effects of clonal integration on the invasive clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides under heterogeneous and homogeneous water availability. Sci. Rep.6 (1), 29767. doi:Â 10.1038/srep29767
42
YuF.ChenY.DongM. (2001). Clonal integration enhances survival and performance of Potentilla anserina, suffering from partial sand burial on ordos plateau, China. Evolutionary Ecol.15 (4-6), 303–318. doi: 10.1023/A:1016032831038
43
YuJ.LiY.HanG.ZhouD.FuY.GuanB.et al. (2014). The spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in coastal zone of the yellow river delta. Environ. Earth Sci.72 (2), 589–599. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2980-0
44
YuH.WangL.LiuC.YuD.QuJ. (2020). Effects of a spatially heterogeneous nutrient distribution on the growth of clonal wetland plants. BMC Ecol.20, 59. doi: 10.1186/s12898-020-00327-1
45
YuJ.ZhanC.LiY.ZhouD.FuY.ChuX.et al. (2016). Distribution of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in coastal wetland soil related land use in the modern yellow river delta. Sci. Rep.6, 37940. doi: 10.1038/srep37940
46
YukikaS.HirokoU.KazuhiroK.ToshiyaA.FumioH.NaotoT.et al. (1995). Novel light-dark change of proline levels in halophyte (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum l.) and glycophytes (Hordeum vulgare l. and Triticum aestivum l.) leaves and roots under salt stress. Plant Cell Physiol.36 (6), 965–970. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078867
47
ZhangL.AlpertP.SiC.YuF. (2018). Interactive effects of fragment size, nutrients, and interspecific competition on growth of the floating, clonal plant salvinia natans. Aquat. Bot.153, 81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2018.12.001
48
ZhangW.YangG.SunJ.ChenJ.ZhangY. (2015). Clonal integration enhances the performance of a clonal plant species under soil alkalinity stress. PloS One10 (3), e0119942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119942
49
ZhaoX.WangL.ZhouC.ShangH. (2007). Effects of salt stress on the absorption and accumulation of na+ and k+ in seedlings of four winter wheat (Tritium aestivum) genotypes. Acta Ecologica Sin.27 (1), 205–213. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4693.1442
Summary
Keywords
Phragmites australis, salt heterogeneity, clonal integration, ecological adaptation, ion content
Citation
Guan B, Yu J, Wu M, Liu X, Wang X, Yang J, Zhou D and Zhang X (2023) Clonal integration promotes the growth of Phragmites australis populations in saline wetlands of the Yellow River Delta. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1162923. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1162923
Received
10 February 2023
Accepted
08 May 2023
Published
02 June 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Yong Li, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China
Reviewed by
Weihua Guo, Shandong University, China; Fei-Hai Yu, Taizhou University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Guan, Yu, Wu, Liu, Wang, Yang, Zhou and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Junbao Yu, junbao.yu@gmail.com; Xiaolong Zhang, vxl173@sohu.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.