Abstract
Humans have been modifying plant traits for thousands of years, first through selection (i.e., domestication) then modern breeding, and in the last 30 years, through biotechnology. These modifications have resulted in increased yield, more efficient agronomic practices, and enhanced quality traits. Precision knowledge of gene regulation and function through high-resolution single-cell omics technologies, coupled with the ability to engineer plant genomes at the DNA sequence, chromatin accessibility, and gene expression levels, can enable engineering of complex and complementary traits at the biosystem level. Populus spp., the primary genetic model system for woody perennials, are among the fastest growing trees in temperate zones and are important for both carbon sequestration and global carbon cycling. Ample genomic and transcriptomic resources for poplar are available including emerging single-cell omics datasets. To expand use of poplar outside of valorization of woody biomass, chassis with novel morphotypes in which stem branching and tree height are modified can be fabricated thereby leading to trees with altered leaf to wood ratios. These morphotypes can then be engineered into customized chemotypes that produce high value biofuels, bioproducts, and biomaterials not only in specific organs but also in a cell-type-specific manner. For example, the recent discovery of triterpene production in poplar leaf trichomes can be exploited using cell-type specific regulatory sequences to synthesize high value terpenes such as the jet fuel precursor bisabolene specifically in the trichomes. By spatially and temporally controlling expression, not only can pools of abundant precursors be exploited but engineered molecules can be sequestered in discrete cell structures in the leaf. The structural diversity of the hemicellulose xylan is a barrier to fully utilizing lignocellulose in biomaterial production and by leveraging cell-type-specific omics data, cell wall composition can be modified in a tailored and targeted specific manner to generate poplar wood with novel chemical features that are amenable for processing or advanced manufacturing. Precision engineering poplar as a multi-purpose sustainable feedstock highlights how genome engineering can be used to re-imagine a crop species.
1 Introduction
Domestication and breeding efforts have shown that selection of specific plant architecture traits across a wide array of plant species, both annuals and perennials, results in improved traits for human use, either for food, feed, or fuel (Ragauskas et al., 2006; ). Similarly, selective breeding can yield distinct chemotypes of crops with desired chemical profiles or compositions (MacKay et al., 1997; Sattler et al., 2010). With advances in biotechnology and genome engineering, existing knowledge of developmental and metabolic pathways can provide the foundation for strategic and multiplexed engineering of plant architecture and metabolism on a genome and epigenome scale. For example, an elegant but simple experiment changed the architecture of solanaceous crops to be more suited to urban agriculture, converting a vine to a compact, early maturing plant through gene editing of only three key regulators of growth and development (). Likewise, through direct gene editing, tomatoes with elevated levels of γ-aminobutyric acid were developed (Waltz, 2022).
Many agricultural traits of interest are the direct result of tuning gene expression (Semel et al., 2006; Rodríguez-Leal et al., 2017), which can be manipulated on several levels. Controlling transcript abundance and/or cis-regulatory element (CRE) activity present effective and robust approaches to tune the expression of specific genes. Such genome engineering and synthetic biology approaches require characterized DNA parts that underlie the toolkit to modulate gene expression; however, there have been few plant-specific and plant-derived parts that have been systematically characterized, tested, and optimized. As a result, many of the parts that are used in “cutting-edge” plant synthetic biology efforts are derived from mammalian systems discovered over 30 years ago (). Thus, there is a great opportunity to identify new plant DNA parts that will enhance the dynamic range in which one can tune and manipulate gene expression in plants. Furthermore, our understanding of the trans-regulatory landscape has lagged, primarily due to a lack of scalable approaches that can systematically characterize the regulatory function of transcription factors in a systematic manner beyond just their DNA binding properties. Transcriptional effector domains are a broad and poorly characterized class of protein sequences that play a role in regulating transcription either through directly affecting transcription or indirectly modifying chromatin state. Effector screens are only now being implemented in eukaryotic systems (Tycko et al., 2020), and have been poorly characterized systematically in plants.
Advances in microfluidics and droplet chemistry birthed single-cell genomics, whereby molecular events such as transcript abundance or chromatin accessibility are measured for thousands of individual cells simultaneously (Vandereyken et al., 2023). These technologies result in the ability to assign cell type labels (e.g., epidermis, xylem, mesophyll, etc.) to individual cells that are part of a mixed cell-type population in a tissue or organ. Using single-cell genomic data we can discern the identity of each cell type, detect cell-type-specific expression of transcription factors and/or key metabolic enzymes, and identify cell-type-specific CREs required for spatial and temporal regulation of gene expression that can then be used to drive transgene expression in a cell-type-specific manner (Vandereyken et al., 2023).
For several crop species, we are on the cusp of true synthetic biology in which a design-build-test-learn cycle is used to engineer new traits and/or re-engineer existing traits. While model species such as rice and Arabidopsis thaliana (hereafter Arabidopsis) are powerful systems for synthetic biology approaches due to their simple genomes, rapid generation times, and ease of genome editing and transformation, they fail to provide a full spectrum of phenotypes and attributes needed to engineer plants with complex traits. Perennial trees represent a sustainable source of fixed carbon and are significant feedstocks of manufacturing processes including the pulp and paper industries, and, increasingly, the bioenergy industry. Precision genome engineering in perennial woody feedstock species would provide opportunities to further benefit the bioeconomy and the environment. One such perennial woody crop is poplar.
2 Populus: a key species for sustainable biofuel, bioproduct, and biomaterial production
Poplars (Populus sp. and hybrids) are among the fastest growing trees in temperate zones important for both carbon sequestration and global carbon cycling. As a species with rich genomics resources (Tuskan et al., 2006; ), poplar has emerged as the primary genetic model system for woody perennials (; ; Zhang et al., 2019). While there has been a heavy focus on poplar cell wall composition and its use as a biofuel feedstock (; Schultz and Coleman, 2021), there has also been a burst of basic research over the last few decades that has substantially improved our understanding of poplar biology. As poplar has a long breeding cycle, improving this key tree crop using traditional breeding approaches is a decades-long process. The advent of genome engineering and synthetic biology, coupled with our increased knowledge base, provides the foundation for engineering improved poplar for use as sustainable sources of biofuels, biomaterials, and bioproducts. Key to success in the development of engineered poplar will be bespoke clones with architecture, photosynthetic, biochemistry, and ecological features that are ‘tuned’ to their use as a biofuel, biomaterial and/or bioproduct feedstock.
3 Morphotypes and chemotypes
Most crop species were domesticated within the last 10,000 years from wild relatives with key components of domestication, known as the domestication syndrome, being modified architecture, increased seed/fruit size, reduction in seed/fruit abscission, modified flowering time, and altered seed/fruit composition (Meyer et al., 2012). Modern breeding over the past century has further improved and diversified agronomic traits represented by current elite cultivars with high yield and improved quality traits. One major component of increased yield is due, in part, to alteration of plant architecture. For example, in maize, planting density has increased from 32,000 plants/ha in the 1930s to >70,000 plants/ha in the 2000s, facilitated by changes in leaf angle resulting in plants with more erect stature (for review see Mantilla-Perez and Salas Fernandez, 2017). In other cereals, the Green Revolution was propelled by breeding dwarf stature wheat and rice (); further improvements in wheat, barley, and oat have resulted in more narrow and erect leaves that contribute to increased grain yield. The optimized architectures of these modern morphotypes improve light capture, photosynthetic capacity, stand density, harvest index, and product quality. Similar changes in the architecture of dicot crops is exemplified by the breeding in the 1940s and 1950s of upright bushy-type beans from prostate viney beans (). These changes in architecture led to a significant change in agronomic practices due to the ability to combine upright, bush types with increased yield and improved disease resistance.
In addition to improved morphotypes, evolution and selective breeding have resulted in chemical diversity within a species as exemplified by numerous culinary herbs (oregano, thyme; aroma) (Werker et al., 1985; Trindade et al., 2018), root crops (sweet potato; carotenoid content) (), cannabis (cannabinoid profiles) (), eucalyptus (essential oil profiles) (Wallis et al., 2011), and poplars (bud exudates) (; ). This diversification has resulted in ‘tuned’ chemotypes in which individual accessions have a unique metabolite profile. For example, basil cultivars have distinct profiles of phenolics that contribute to the variation associated with its use as a flavoring herb or agent (). In catnip, there are four possible stereoisomers of the cat attractant nepetalactone and different accessions have unique compositions of the four stereoisomers (Lichman et al., 2020).
Thus, historical selection and conventional breeding have converted wild species into novel morpho- and chemo-types that are not only compatible with modern agronomic production practices but also have altered compositional traits that are tuned to desired human traits whether it be food, feed, or fodder.
4 Enabling technologies for genome and epigenome engineering of complex traits with precision
Our understanding of the cis-regulatory code in plants is starting to emerge (Marand et al., 2021) thanks to studies that map accessible chromatin regions reflecting nucleosome-depleted regions. These regions are often enriched for transcription factor binding elements, enhancers and silencers. Core promoters provide the necessary sequences for transcription initiation, whereas enhancers or silencers are bound by transcription factors that exert activation or repression of gene expression, respectively (Schmitz et al., 2022). The use of Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) (; Lu et al., 2017; Maher et al., 2018) across a range of plant species has shown that accessible chromatin regions are enriched at the transcriptional start site marking the core promoter, yet 33-66% of accessible chromatin regions containing enhancers and promoters were located >1kb away from their target gene (Oka et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2019; Ricci et al., 2019). The ease at detecting accessible chromatin makes it possible to identify transcription factor motifs providing a framework to begin construction of gene regulatory networks.
Application of single-cell technologies to plant systems has just begun to emerge (Ryu et al., 2021); to date, multiple single-cell gene expression studies have been published in poplar using protoplasts as well as isolated nuclei, including studies on vegetative shoot apex (), differentiating xylem (; Tung et al., 2023), and stems (; Xie et al., 2021; ). These studies have already revealed novel information on cell-type-specific gene expression, developmental trajectories of cell types, and new insights into vascular development in a woody perennial compared to the herbaceous annual, Arabidopsis. With respect to CREs, the majority of accessible chromatin studies to date have been in bulk tissue thereby representing a diverse set of cell types. At the single cell level, single nuclei RNA-seq and single cell ATAC-seq from over 70,000 cells was used to produce an atlas of CREs in the maize genome (Marand et al., 2021). This enabled discovery of cell-type-specific CREs, cell-type-specific expression of transcription factors and their binding motifs, non-cell autonomous activity of transcription factors, and genome-wide association signals that were highly enriched in cell-type-specific CREs and for which breeders had been unknowingly selecting for cell-type-specific CREs to improve trait performance (Marand et al., 2021). Application of single-cell techniques to decipher cell-type gene expression and CREs in each crop species will be instrumental in development of genome engineering reagents that have high temporal and spatial specificity.
Efforts to characterize the genome-wide landscape of plant transcription factor binding and transcription factor effector activity is revealing the components needed to function as ‘payloads’ to deliver enzymatic or effector activity to specific regions of the genome. For example, the use of dCas9 and/or TAL effectors in fusion with histone modifying enzymes such as histone acetyltransferase, histone methyltransferases and histone demethylases has been shown to engineer epigenomes in animal and plant cells (Sgro and Blancafort, 2020; ). Recent development of synthetic transcriptional systems have enabled the efficient design of both synthetic transcription factors and promoters (). Such systems have been leveraged to tether putative effector domains from various Arabidopsis transcription factors to create fusion synthetic transcription factors that have enabled the characterization and quantitatively measurement of the regulatory nature of each effector domain (i.e., activation or repression). A recent study screened over 400 Arabidopsis putative effector domains that has unlocked a rich diversity of parts that can now be used for fine-tuning gene expression (). Many of these newly discovered DNA parts significantly expand the dynamic range for gene activation when compared to the state-of-the-art parts used for gene activation via dCas9-based genome engineering (e.g., VP16). Importantly, many of these effector domains most likely control transcription by affecting different facets and levels of regulation, i.e., through transcription or chromatin accessibility. There are an estimated 4,729 transcription factors in the 717 genome and a systematic screen of effector domains would provide a means to either fuse them to dCas9 or other transcription factors to modulate and better control expression of endogenous genes, which will form the underlying poplar-tailored tools for engineering various facets of morphotype and chemotype in poplar. In addition, methods for epigenome engineering in plants using a variety of approaches are emerging (; ).
5 Engineering morphotypes
Extensive knowledge of the genetic basis of tree architecture traits provides the foundation to design novel morphotypes of poplar with modified tree architecture (Figure 1). Morphotypes with altered biomass potential can increase stand density, tree integrity (particularly when reducing/modifying cell wall properties), and photosynthetic capture, which can serve as foundational chassis in a biosystem design of poplar for multi-uses. The recent discovery that the non-glandular trichomes of poplar are sites of triterpene biosynthesis and accrual coupled with the discovery of transcription factors controlling trichome development () provide the foundation to not only modify the density of trichomes on the leaf surface but also to hijack the trichome for synthesis of terpenoids with biofuel and bioproduct use (Figure 1). These chassis will have altered ratios of leaves to stem and/or trichome density in which further engineering of cell wall composition for biomaterial production and/or novel bioproducts such as precursors for drop-in fuels, thus making chemotypes that are ‘customized’ to their application and simultaneously ‘maximized’ in optimal morphotypes. As it is likely that the initial morphotypes/chemotypes will have pleiotropic effects, an iterative design process, in which developmental and metabolic pathways are optimized to create unique morpho-/chemotypes with tailored biomaterial/bioproduct composition, will be required. Through iterative design-build-test-learn cycles, poplar can be engineered into a multi-purpose feedstock, not only for bioenergy but also for biomaterial and bioproduct production.
Figure 1
Genome engineering technologies permit gene editing at the single-base level and in the case of outcrossing species such as poplar, with allelic resolution. The interspecific F1 hybrid P. tremula x P. alba INRA 717-1B4 (717 hereafter) (Mader et al., 2016) is highly amenable to Agrobacterium transformation () and CRISPR genome editing (Zhou et al., 2015). Key to this success is a custom variant database which facilitates SNP-aware guide RNA designs for mono-, bi- or multi-allelic editing (Tsai and Xue, 2015), and a recently generated haplotype-resolved, telomere-to-telomere assembly of the hybrid genome (Zhou et al., 2023). This has enabled efficient mutagenesis of multigene families, including genome duplicates and/or tandem repeat (Tsai et al., 2020; ; ). Importantly, nearly 100% of edits are biallelic in 717 (Zhou et al., 2015; Tsai et al., 2020; ). Efficient and specific editing along with demonstrated stability over multiple clonal generations (; ) suggests complex multi-gene engineering strategies are feasible in elite woody perennials that are propagated by vegetative means.
5.1 Tree architecture traits
Crown architecture, including branching characteristics, is a strong determinant of growth and productivity of woody biomass crops (). In temperate trees, crown architecture is the result of numerous developmental factors, some of which can be subject to environmental influence including phyllotaxy, bud dormancy (influenced by apical dominance and apical control), branch and leaf angles (influenced by light and gravity sensing), internode length, and branching pattern ().
Branching pattern is primarily determined by prolepsis through outgrowth of overwintering buds (proleptic branching). Some species, including poplars, can also produce sylleptic branches through outgrowth of newly formed axillary buds (Wu and Hinckley, 2001; Oshima et al., 2013). Sylleptic branches increase leaf area for efficient photosynthetic light capture, and have long been proposed as a highly desirable trait in poplar ideotype breeding for biomass production (). However, the potential of this ‘ideotype concept’ () has not been fully realized. Synthetic biology approaches can facilitate development of designer poplar ideotypes to meet the growing demands of bioproducts and biomaterials. While the molecular regulation of sylleptic branching is not fully understood, studies from herbaceous models, fruit trees, and poplar have shed light on several transcription factors with evolutionarily conserved roles in plant architecture. A prime example is the TCP family of transcription factors, including TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 (TB1) in maize and BRANCHED1 (BRC1) in Arabidopsis, which suppress axillary bud outgrowth (; ). Accordingly, mutations of TB1/BRC1 and their orthologs in multiple monocot and dicot species, including poplar, promote shoot branching and alter plant architecture (Muhr et al., 2018). These and other transcription factors can be targeted to engineer designer poplar morphotypes, i.e., chassis, in which tree architecture is altered simultaneously resulting in improved photosynthetic light capture, harvest index, and metabolic pathways such as cell wall composition.
To design trees with altered branching patterns, it is critical to modulate branch angles to minimize competition between sylleptic branches and optimize light capture within dense canopies (Osada and Hiura, 2017). In maize, upright leaf angles improve light capture under crowded conditions (Pendleton et al., 1968). Therefore, designing a poplar morphotype needs to encompass branching patterns along with optimized branch and leaf angles. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in understanding the genetic influences on branch growth angles. Branch angle is strongly influenced by the IGT family including Tiller Angle Control 1 (TAC1) and LAZY1 genes. Loss of TAC1 in plum leads to upright branch, leaf, and flower bud angles (; ). The TAC1 pathway is known to be modulated by photosynthetic signals, suggesting a direct connection between plant architecture and light use efficiency (Waite and Dardick, 2018). In contrast, loss of LAZY1 expression leads to horizontally oriented branches and downward oriented leaves. Transgenic poplar overexpressing TAC1 showed increased branch angle, whereas overexpression of LAZY1 decreased the branch angle (Xu et al., 2017). Loss of WEEP expression leads to downward shoot growth angles in peach and plum (Figure 2) and steeper root angles in Arabidopsis and its orthologue EGT2 controls root gravity responses in wheat and barley (; ). Manipulation and fine tuning of IGT family genes in combination with branching genes will allow for the fine-tuning of chassis designs to optimize biomass.
Figure 2
Overall tree size is another critical component of optimized poplar chassis for different biomass and biomaterial applications. Smaller trees enable simpler management strategies that are more amenable to mechanization. Tree height is influenced by a combination of branching patterns and stem elongation. Elongation is controlled by cell expansion, predominantly regulated by gibberellic acid (GA) via the GA receptor Gibberellin Insensitive Dwarf 1 (GID1). GID1 is negatively regulated by DELLA proteins that mediate proteasomal degradation of GID1 via direct interactions with GA (Wang and Deng, 2014). Reduced GID1 or over-expression of DELLA can lead to shorter internode lengths and reduced tree size (Mauriat and Moritz, 2009; ). Alternatively, GA levels and tree size can be manipulated by altered expression of GA metabolic enzymes (Mauriat and Moritz, 2009; ).
5.2 Trichomes as chemical factories for production of biofuels
Glandular trichomes are known for their ability to synthesize, store, and secrete large quantities of specialized metabolites, especially terpenoids, that function primarily in plant defense (Schuurink and Tissier, 2020). Many petroleum-derived commodity chemicals and fuels can be alternatively derived from terpenoids. Thus, trichomes offer a unique opportunity to hijack a natural tissue for production of targeted compounds as not only are there large pools of precursors to drive their biosynthesis, but the final molecules are naturally sequestered from other cells and organs. Non-glandular trichomes are present in a broad range of plant taxa, including Arabidopsis and Populus, and they synthesize and store predominantly phenolics but do not possess secretory abilities (Payne, 1978; ). We recently showed that poplar non-glandular trichomes are also sites of triterpene biosynthesis and accrual ().
Trichome initiation and development are under strict spatiotemporal regulation, involving the ‘MBW’ transcription activation complex of R2R3-MYB, bHLH and WD40 proteins (Maes et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2008). Previously, activation-tagging identified PtaMYB186 as a positive regulator of trichome development in 717 (Plett et al., 2010). PtaMYB186 is orthologous to Arabidopsis AtMYB106 involved in trichome branching () and cuticle development (Oshima et al., 2013). This clade of MYB family is expanded in poplar, with four members derived from whole-genome and tandem duplications. Gene editing of PtaMYB186 and its paralogs PtaMYB138 and PtaMYB38 resulted in glaborous plants with eight edited alleles, two more than anticipated due to unexpected duplications in one of the 717 subgenomes (; Zhou et al., 2023). The only exception is KO-27 which retains two wild-type (unedited) alleles with greatly reduced trichome density. The data together with previous findings of increased trichome density by PtaMYB186 overexpression (Plett et al., 2010) support the premise that trichome density can be fine-tuned in a dose-dependent manner by manipulation of MYB copy number and/or expression. Interestingly, analysis of solvent extractable leaf cuticular wax revealed a complete absence of triterpenes in the glabrous mutants, while β-sitosterol was significantly reduced (). Reduced accrual of wax components may reflect a greatly reduced surface area due to loss of trichomes. This is the case for β-sitosterol as its levels were unchanged in whole leaf analysis. However, triterpenes remained absent in whole leaves of the mutants, implicating poplar trichomes in triterpene biosynthesis and storage ().
As trichomes play multiple protective roles against feeding insects, excessive transpiration, and UV radiation (), precise targeting of one to multiple alleles by CRISPR-KO or CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) can generate a spectrum of trichome phenotypes as chassis for poplar chemotype engineering.
6 Engineering chemotypes
With increased knowledge of biochemistry, engineered morphotype chassis can be further customized to produce biofuels, biomaterials and bioproducts tuned to their morphology. There are several target organs in poplar with potential for sustained production of biofuels, biomaterials and bioproducts: leaves and wood.
6.1 Trichome and leaf cuticle
Chemotype engineering of heterologous, high-value terpenes in a trichome and/or cuticle over-producing morphotype would yield a customized chemo-/morphotype. One candidate for chemotype engineering of trichomes and cuticles is the sesquiterpene, bisabolene, which has been engineered for its ability to be converted to bisabolane, a biodiesel (Peralta-Yahya et al., 2011). Rewiring plant metabolism to over accumulate bisabolene requires three strategies. First, sesquiterpenes like triterpenes are primarily produced through the mevalonate pathway, and use of feedback-insensitive enzymes will enable increased flux through the mevalonate pathway. Specifically, a truncated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase has been widely used in such metabolic engineering efforts and shown to work in plants (Polakowski et al., 1998); by coupling this approach with the introduction of bisabolene synthase, we expect to increase production of bisabolene. Second, the plastid methyl-d-erythritol phosphate pathway can be used to increase production of bisabolene in the chloroplast (Wu et al., 2012) which has been demonstrated previously to increase production of bisabolene in Nicotiana benthamiana using gene stacking approaches (Shih et al., 2016). As sesquiterpenes are not natively produced via the methyl-D-erythritol phosphate pathway in the chloroplast, introducing a farnesyl diphosphate synthase into the plastid, the precursor to bisabolene, farnesyl diphosphate, can be biosynthesized and converted to bisabolene. This strategy led to an over 400% increase in production of bisabolene in N. benthamiana, and should be transferable to poplar as well. Third, selectively decreasing the flux to competing triterpenoid pathways by CRISPRi or gene-/allele-specific CRISPR-KO will reduce expression of key triterpene enzymes natively expressed in trichomes and/or cuticles, thereby enhancing production of the sesquiterpene of interest, bisabolene. Overall, trichomes and cuticles are an attractive platform for the sustainable production and accumulation of various terpene products of interest.
6.2 Cell wall modification
Fifty billion tons of carbon is assimilated by terrestrial plants annually each year (Melillo et al., 1993), representing a sustainable source of chemicals and energy. Historically, industrial applications of woody biomass have been limited mainly to bulk construction materials, viscose and lyocell textile fibers, cellulose pulps, food and feed additives, and fuel for direct combustion. The plant cell walls that make up the bulk of poplar biomass are primarily composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin (Sannigrahi et al., 2010). Cellulose provides essential mechanical support, whereas lignin and hemicellulose form additional interactions that further strengthen cell walls (). Due to these hierarchical structures and interactions, plant biomass can also be used at micro-, nano-, and molecular levels for diverse applications to address current and future societal needs in the energy, environmental, materials, and manufacturing fields. Our ability to design and genetically modify the structure and interactions of the polymers in the plant cell wall is key to realizing this potential.
Progress in biorefining technologies has provided chemical and biocatalytic routes for selective valorization of leafy and woody biomass, enabling controlled fractionation to produce compounds suitable for fuel and chemical production while preserving useful glycopolymers and micro- and macro-structures (). Relative to cellulose and lignin, hemicellulose biosynthesis represents an underexplored target for altering the molecular structure and composition of cell walls. The hemicellulose xylan is a polymer composed of five-carbon (C5) sugars and is the second most abundant polysaccharide in poplar biomass after cellulose (Smith et al., 2017). It constitutes 25-35% of the cell walls of most lignocellulosic feedstocks, and roughly 10 billion metric tons of CO2 are assimilated by terrestrial plants into xylan each year (Smith et al., 2017). Despite their abundance, hemicelluloses have not been widely utilized to produce value-added products in modern integrated biorefineries, largely due to their complexity and structural diversity (Smith et al., 2017). Hemicelluloses are major byproducts of the multimillion tons of lignocellulose used in the production of viscose, paper products and fuels. However, C5 sugars are underutilized or considered recalcitrant () during the production of second-generation biofuels (Van Vleet and Jeffries, 2009), resulting in the accumulation of oligosaccharide and polysaccharide byproducts. Thus, many research efforts have aimed to reduce xylan/C5 sugar content (Yan et al., 2018), rather than optimizing its structure for more facile removal/fractionation and downstream upgrading into value-added products, such as xylan-based bioplastic building blocks or pre-biotics.
Strategies can be designed to shape desirable polymer structures, increase or decrease susceptibility to chemical or enzymatic deconstruction or modification, impact wall architecture via modulation of polymer-polymer interactions, and homogenize or alter composition to reduce downstream requirements for extraction, separations, and/or purification (Figure 3). For poplar, integrating morphotypes that have altered physical branching patterns together with genome engineering of genes responsible for xylan synthesis and diversification in a tailored, cell-type-specific manner will enable production of material with improved chemical features amenable for processing or advanced manufacturing (Smith et al., 2017; Smith et al., 2020).
Figure 3
7 Conclusion
Through the development of high-resolution cell atlas data coupled with new genome and epigenome engineering tools, morphotypes of poplar with altered tree architecture and trichome density can be generated (Figure 1). These morphotypes will have altered biomass potential via increased stand density, tree integrity (particularly when modifying cell wall properties), trichome density, and photosynthetic capture, and serve as the foundational chassis. These chassis will have altered ratios of leaf to wood and/or trichome density in which we can further engineer cell wall composition for biomaterial production and/or novel bioproducts such as precursors for drop-in fuels, thus making chemotypes of poplar that are ‘customized’ to their application and simultaneously ‘maximized’ in optimal morphotypes.
Statements
Author contributions
CB: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Supervision. CD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WP: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CT: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BU: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research program under Award Numbers DE-SC0023338 and 89243023SSC000102 and the Center for Bioenergy Innovation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Aguilar-MartínezJ. A.Poza-CarriónC.CubasP. (2007). Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell19, 458–472. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048934
2
AlbersheimP.DarvillA.RobertsK.SederoffR.StaehelinA. (2010). Plant cell walls (1st ed.). Garland Science. doi: 10.1201/9780203833476
3
AnY.LiuY.LiuY.LuM.KangX.MansfieldS. D.et al. (2021). Opportunities and barriers for biofuel and bioenergy production from poplar. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy13, 905–913. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12829
4
BajomoE. M.AingM. S.FordL. S.NiemeyerE. D. (2022). Chemotyping of commercially available basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) varieties: Cultivar and morphotype influence phenolic acid composition and antioxidant properties. NFS J.26, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nfs.2022.01.001
5
BelcherM. S.VuuK. M.ZhouA.MansooriN.Agosto RamosA.ThompsonM. G.et al. (2020). Design of orthogonal regulatory systems for modulating gene expression in plants. Nat. Chem. Biol.16, 857–865. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0547-4
6
BeriD.YorkW. S.LyndL. R.PeñaM. J.HerringC. D. (2020). Development of a thermophilic coculture for corn fiber conversion to ethanol. Nat. Commun.11, 1937. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15704-z
7
BewgW. P.CiD.TsaiC.-J. (2018). Genome editing in trees: from multiple repair pathways to long-term stability. Front. Plant Sci.9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01732
8
BewgW. P.HardingS. A.EngleN. L.VaidyaB. N.ZhouR.ReevesJ.et al. (2022). Multiplex knockout of trichome-regulating MYB duplicates in hybrid poplar using a single gRNA. Plant Physiol.189, 516–526. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac128
9
BickfordC. P. (2016). Ecophysiology of leaf trichomes. Funct. Plant Biol.43, 807–814. doi: 10.1071/FP16095
10
BuenrostroJ. D.GiresiP. G.ZabaL. C.ChangH. Y.GreenleafW. J. (2013). Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods10, 1213–1218. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2688
11
CampbellM. E.PalfreymanJ. W.PrestonC. M. (1984). Identification of herpes simplex virus DNA sequences which encode a trans-acting polypeptide responsible for stimulation of immediate early transcription. J. Mol. Biol.180, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90427-3
12
CeulemansR.StettlerR. F.HinckleyT. M.IsebrandsJ. G.HeilmanP. E. (1990). Crown architecture of Populus clones as determined by branch orientation and branch characteristics. Tree Physiol.7, 157–167. doi: 10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.157
13
ChampagneA.BernillonS.MoingA.RolinD.LegendreL.LebotV. (2010). Carotenoid profiling of tropical root crop chemotypes from Vanuatu, South Pacific. J. Food Compost. Anal.23, 763–771. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2010.03.021
14
ChenY.-H.SharmaS.BewgW. P.XueL.-J.GizelbachC. R.TsaiC.-J. (2023). Multiplex editing of the nucleoredoxin1 tandem array in poplar: from small indels to translocations and complex inversions. CRISPR J.6, 339–349. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2022.0096
15
ChenY.TongS.JiangY.AiF.FengY.ZhangJ.et al. (2021). Transcriptional landscape of highly lignified poplar stems at single-cell resolution. Genome Biol.22, 319. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02537-2
16
CondeD.TriozziP. M.PereiraW. J.SchmidtH. W.BalmantK. M.KnaackS. A.et al. (2022). Single-nuclei transcriptome analysis of the shoot apex vascular system differentiation in Populus. Development149 (21), dev200632. doi: 10.1242/dev.200632
17
DardickC.CallahanA.HornR.RuizK. B.ZhebentyayevaT.HollenderC.et al. (2013). PpeTAC1 promotes the horizontal growth of branches in peach trees and is a member of a functionally conserved gene family found in diverse plants species. Plant J.75, 618–630. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12234
18
De MeijerE. (2014). The chemical phenotypes (chemotypes) of Cannabis. Handb. cannabis89, 110. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662685.003.0005
19
DickmannD. I.GoldM. A.FloreJ. A. (2010). The ideotype concept and the genetic improvement of tree crops. Plant Breed. Rev.163–193. doi: 10.1002/9780470650493.ch6
20
DoebleyJ.StecA.HubbardL. (1997). The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature386, 485–488. doi: 10.1038/386485a0
21
DouglasC. J. (2017). ““Populus as a model tree,”,” in Comparative and Evolutionary Genomics of Angiosperm Trees. Eds. GrooverA.CronkQ. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 61–84.
22
DuJ.WangY.ChenW.XuM.ZhouR.ShouH.et al. (2023). High-resolution anatomical and spatial transcriptome analyses reveal two types of meristematic cell pools within the secondary vascular tissue of poplar stem. Mol. Plant. 16 (5), P808–829. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2023.03.005
23
EvansL. M.SlavovG. T.Rodgers-MelnickE.MartinJ.RanjanP.MucheroW.et al. (2014). Population genomics of Populus trichocarpa identifies signatures of selection and adaptive trait associations. Nat. Genet.46, 1089–1096. doi: 10.1038/ng.3075
24
EvensonR. E.GollinD. (2003). Assessing the impact of the green revolution 1960 to 2000. Science300, 758–762. doi: 10.1126/science.1078710
25
FolkersU.BergerJ.HülskampM. (1997). Cell morphogenesis of trichomes in Arabidopsis: differential control of primary and secondary branching by branch initiation regulators and cell growth. Development124, 3779–3786. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.19.3779
26
GardinerJ.GhoshalB.WangM.JacobsenS. E. (2022). CRISPR-Cas-mediated transcriptional control and epi-mutagenesis. Plant Physiol.188, 1811–1824. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac033
27
GreenawayW.EnglishS.MayJ.WhatleyF. R. (1991). Chemotaxonomy of section Leuce poplars by GC-MS of bud exudate. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.19, 507–518. doi: 10.1016/0305-1978(91)90071-7
28
GreenawayW.WhatleyF. R. (1990). Analysis of phenolics of bud exudate of Populus angustifolia by GC-MS. Phytochemistry29, 2551–2554. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(90)85186-J
29
HollenderC. A.DardickC. (2015). Molecular basis of angiosperm tree architecture. New Phytol.206, 541–556. doi: 10.1111/nph.13204
30
HollenderC. A.HadiartoT.SrinivasanC.ScorzaR.DardickC. (2016). A brachytic dwarfism trait (dw) in peach trees is caused by a nonsense mutation within the gibberellic acid receptor PpeGID1c. New Phytol.210, 227–239. doi: 10.1111/nph.13772
31
HollenderC. A.PascalT.TabbA.HadiartoT.SrinivasanC.WangW.et al. (2018a). Loss of a highly conserved sterile alpha motif domain gene (WEEP) results in pendulous branch growth in peach trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.115, E4690–E4699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704515115
32
HollenderC. A.WaiteJ. M.TabbA.RainesD.ChinnithambiS.DardickC. (2018b). Alteration of TAC1 expression in Prunus species leads to pleiotropic shoot phenotypes. Hortic. Res.5, 26. doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0034-1
33
HummelN. F. C.ZhouA.LiB.MarkelK.OrnelasI. J.ShihP. M. (2023). The trans-regulatory landscape of gene networks in plants. Cell Syst.14, 501–511.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2023.05.002
34
JanssonS.DouglasC. J. (2007). Populus: a model system for plant biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.58, 435–458. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103956
35
JeonH.-W.ChoJ.-S.ParkE.-J.HanK.-H.ChoiY.-I.KoJ.-H. (2016). Developing xylem-preferential expression of PdGA20ox1, a gibberellin 20-oxidase 1 from Pinus densiflora, improves woody biomass production in a hybrid poplar. Plant Biotechnol. J.14, 1161–1170. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12484
36
JiL.JordanW. T.ShiX.HuL.HeC.SchmitzR. J. (2018). TET-mediated epimutagenesis of the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nat. Commun.9, 895. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03289-7
37
KarabourniotisG.LiakopoulosG.NikolopoulosD.BrestaP. (2020). Protective and defensive roles of non-glandular trichomes against multiple stresses: structure–function coordination. J. Forestry Res.31, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11676-019-01034-4
38
KellyJ. D. (2001). Remaking bean plant architecture for efficient production. Adv. Agron.71, 109–143. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71013-9
39
KirschnerG. K.RosignoliS.GuoL.VardanegaI.ImaniJ.AltmüllerJ.et al. (2021). ENHANCED GRAVITROPISM 2 encodes a STERILE ALPHA MOTIF–containing protein that controls root growth angle in barley and wheat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2101526118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101526118
40
KwonC. T.HeoJ.LemmonZ. H.CapuaY.HuttonS. F.Van EckJ.et al. (2020). Rapid customization of Solanaceae fruit crops for urban agriculture. Nat. Biotechnol.38, 182–188. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0361-2
41
LepleJ. C.BrasileiroA. C.MichelM. F.DelmotteF.JouaninL. (1992). Transgenic poplars: expression of chimeric genes using four different constructs. Plant Cell Rep.11, 137–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00232166
42
LiH.DaiX.HuangX.XuM.WangQ.YanX.et al. (2021). Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a high-resolution cell atlas of xylem in Populus. J. Integr. Plant Biol.63, 1906–1921. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13159
43
LiQ.DixonR.CiesielskiP.HimmelM.UrbanowiczB.CaoD.et al. (2022). Multiscale engineering of wood for a sustainable future. ChemRxiv. Available at: https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/633ca8cc114b7e27182885c8.
44
LichmanB. R.GoddenG. T.HamiltonJ. P.PalmerL.KamileenM. O.ZhaoD.et al. (2020). The evolutionary origins of the cat attractant nepetalactone in catnip. Sci. Adv.6, eaba0721. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0721
45
LuZ.HofmeisterB. T.VollmersC.DuBoisR. M.SchmitzR. J. (2017). Combining ATAC-seq with nuclei sorting for discovery of cis-regulatory regions in plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.45, e41. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1179
46
LuZ.MarandA. P.RicciW. A.EthridgeC. L.ZhangX.SchmitzR. J. (2019). The prevalence, evolution and chromatin signatures of plant regulatory elements. Nat. Plants5, 1250–1259. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0548-z
47
MacKayJ. J.O’MalleyD. M.PresnellT.BookerF. L.CampbellM. M.WhettenR. W.et al. (1997). Inheritance, gene expression, and lignin characterization in a mutant pine deficient in cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.94, 8255–8260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.15.8255
48
MaderM.Le PaslierM.-C.BounonR.BérardA.RampantP. F.FladungM.et al. (2016). Whole-genome draft assembly of Populus tremula x P. alba clone INRA 717-1B4. Silvae Genetica65, 74–79. doi: 10.1515/sg-2016-0019
49
MaesL.InzéD.GoossensA. (2008). Functional specialization of the TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 network allows differential hormonal control of laminal and marginal trichome initiation in Arabidopsis rosette leaves. Plant Physiol.148, 1453–1464. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.125385
50
MaherK. A.BajicM.KajalaK.ReynosoM.PauluzziG.WestD. A.et al. (2018). Profiling of accessible chromatin regions across multiple plant species and cell types reveals common gene regulatory principles and new control modules. Plant Cell30, 15–36. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00581
51
Mantilla-PerezM. B.Salas FernandezM. G. (2017). Differential manipulation of leaf angle throughout the canopy: current status and prospects. J. Exp. Bot.68, 5699–5717. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx378
52
MarandA. P.ChenZ.GallavottiA.SchmitzR. J. (2021). A cis-regulatory atlas in maize at single-cell resolution. Cell184, 3041–3055.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.014
53
MauriatM.MoritzT. (2009). Analyses of GA20ox- and GID1-over-expressing aspen suggest that gibberellins play two distinct roles in wood formation. Plant J.58, 989–1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03836.x
54
MelilloJ. M.McGuireA. D.KicklighterD. W.MooreB.VorosmartyC. J.SchlossA. L. (1993). Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature363, 234–240. doi: 10.1038/363234a0
55
MeyerR. S.DuValA. E.JensenH. R. (2012). Patterns and processes in crop domestication: an historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops. New Phytol.196, 29–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04253.x
56
MuhrM.PaulatM.AwwanahM.BrinkkötterM.TeichmannT. (2018). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of Populus BRANCHED1 and BRANCHED2 orthologs reveals a major function in bud outgrowth control. Tree Physiol.38, 1588–1597. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpy088
57
OkaR.ZicolaJ.WeberB.AndersonS. N.HodgmanC.GentJ. I.et al. (2017). Genome-wide mapping of transcriptional enhancer candidates using DNA and chromatin features in maize. Genome Biol.18, 137. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1273-4
58
OsadaN.HiuraT. (2017). How is light interception efficiency related to shoot structure in tall canopy species? Oecologia185, 29–41. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3926-0
59
OshimaY.ShikataM.KoyamaT.OhtsuboN.MitsudaN.Ohme-TakagiM. (2013). MIXTA-like transcription factors and WAX INDUCER1/SHINE1 coordinately regulate cuticle development in Arabidopsis and Torenia fournieri. Plant Cell25, 1609–1624. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.110783
60
PayneW. W. (1978). A glossary of plant hair terminology. Brittonia30, 239. doi: 10.2307/2806659
61
PendletonJ. W.SmithG. E.WinterS. R.JohnstonT. J. (1968). Field investigations of the relationships of leaf angle in corn (Zea mays L.) to grain yield and apparent photosynthesis 1. Agron. J.60, 422–424. doi: 10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000040027x
62
Peralta-YahyaP. P.OuelletM.ChanR.MukhopadhyayA.KeaslingJ. D.LeeT. (2011). Identification and microbial production of a terpene-based advanced biofuel. S. Nat. Commun.2, 483. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1494
63
PlettJ. M.WilkinsO.CampbellM. M.RalphS. G.ReganS. (2010). Endogenous overexpression of Populus MYB186 increases trichome density, improves insect pest resistance, and impacts plant growth. Plant J.64, 419–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04343.x
64
PolakowskiT.StahlU.LangC. (1998). Overexpression of a cytosolic hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase leads to squalene accumulation in yeast. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.49, 66–71. doi: 10.1007/s002530051138
65
RagauskasA. J.WilliamsC. K.DavisonB. H.BritovsekG.CairneyJ.EckertC. A.et al. (2006). The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science311, 484–489. doi: 10.1126/science.1114736
66
RicciW. A.LuZ.JiL.MarandA. P.EthridgeC. L.MurphyN. G.et al. (2019). Widespread long-range cis-regulatory elements in the maize genome. Nat. Plants5, 1237–1249. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0547-0
67
Rodríguez-LealD.LemmonZ. H.ManJ.BartlettM. E.LippmanZ. B. (2017). Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell171, 470–480.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.030
68
RyuK. H.ZhuY.SchiefelbeinJ. (2021). Plant cell identity in the era of single-cell transcriptomics. Annu. Rev. Genet.55, 479–496. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-071719-020453
69
SannigrahiP.RagauskasA. J.TuskanG. A. (2010). Poplar as a feedstock for biofuels: A review of compositional characteristics. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin.4, 209–226. doi: 10.1002/bbb.206
70
SattlerS. E.Funnell-HarrisD. L.PedersenJ. F. (2010). Brown midrib mutations and their importance to the utilization of maize, sorghum, and pearl millet lignocellulosic tissues. Plant Sci.178, 229–238. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.01.001
71
SchmitzR. J.GrotewoldE.StamM. (2022). Cis-regulatory sequences in plants: Their importance, discovery, and future challenges. Plant Cell34, 718–741. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab281
72
SchultzJ. A.ColemanH. D. (2021). Pectin and xylan biosynthesis in poplar: implications and opportunities for biofuels production. Front. Plant Sci.12, 712083. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.712083
73
SchuurinkR.TissierA. (2020). Glandular trichomes: micro-organs with model status? New Phytol.225, 2251–2266. doi: 10.1111/nph.16283
74
SemelY.NissenbaumJ.MendaN.ZinderM.KriegerU.IssmanN.et al. (2006). Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 12981–12986. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604635103
75
SgroA.BlancafortP. (2020). Epigenome engineering: new technologies for precision medicine. Nucleic Acids Res.48, 12453–12482. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1000
76
ShihP. M.VuuK.MansooriN.AyadL.LouieK. B.BowenB. P.et al. (2016). A robust gene-stacking method utilizing yeast assembly for plant synthetic biology. Nat. Commun.7, 13215. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13215
77
SmithP. J.Ortiz-SotoM. E.RothC.BarnesW. J.SeibelJ.UrbanowiczB. R.et al. (2020). Enzymatic synthesis of artificial polysaccharides. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.8, 11853–11871. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03622
78
SmithP. J.WangH.-T.YorkW. S.PeñaM. J.UrbanowiczB. R. (2017). Designer biomass for next-generation biorefineries: leveraging recent insights into xylan structure and biosynthesis. Biotechnol. Biofuels10, 286. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0973-z
79
TrindadeH.PedroL. G.FigueiredoA. C.BarrosoJ. G. (2018). Chemotypes and terpene synthase genes in Thymus genus: State of the art. Ind. Crops Prod.124, 530–547. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.021
80
TsaiC.-J.XuP.XueL.-J.HuH.NyamdariB.NaranR.et al. (2020). Compensatory guaiacyl lignin biosynthesis at the expense of syringyl lignin in 4CL1-knockout poplar. Plant Physiol.183, 123–136. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01550
81
TsaiC.-J.XueL.-J. (2015). CRISPRing into the woods. GM Crops Food6, 206–215. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1091553
82
TungC.-C.KuoS.-C.YangC.-L.YuJ.-H.HuangC.-E.LiouP.-C.et al. (2023). Single-cell transcriptomics unveils xylem cell development and evolution. Genome Biol.24, 3. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02845-1
83
TuskanG. A.DifazioS.JanssonS.BohlmannJ.GrigorievI.HellstenU.et al. (2006). The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science313, 1596–1604. doi: 10.1126/science.1128691
84
TyckoJ.DelRossoN.HessG. T.AradhanaBanerjeeA.MukundA.et al. (2020). High-throughput discovery and characterization of human transcriptional effectors. Cell183, 2020–2035.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.024
85
VandereykenK.SifrimA.ThienpontB.VoetT. (2023). Methods and applications for single-cell and spatial multi-omics. Nat. Rev. Genet.24, 494–515. doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00580-2
86
Van VleetJ. H.JeffriesT. W. (2009). Yeast metabolic engineering for hemicellulosic ethanol production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.20, 300–306. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.06.001
87
WaiteJ. M.DardickC. (2018). TILLER ANGLE CONTROL 1 modulates plant architecture in response to photosynthetic signals. J. Exp. Bot.69, 4935–4944. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery253
88
WallisI. R.KeszeiA.HeneryM. L.MoranG. F.ForresterR.MaintzJ.et al. (2011). A chemical perspective on the evolution of variation in Eucalyptus globulus. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst.13, 305–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2011.05.005
89
WaltzE. (2022). GABA-enriched tomato is first CRISPR-edited food to enter market. Nat. Biotechnol.40, 9–11. doi: 10.1038/d41587-021-00026-2
90
WangY.DengD. (2014). Molecular basis and evolutionary pattern of GA-GID1-DELLA regulatory module. Mol. Genet. Genomics289, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00438-013-0797-x
91
WerkerE.PutievskyE.RavidU. (1985). The essential oils and glandular hairs in different chemotypes of origanum vulgare L. Ann. Bot.55, 793–801. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086958
92
WuR.HinckleyT. M. (2001). Phenotypic plasticity of sylleptic branching: genetic design of tree architecture. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.20, 467–485. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2001.10131827
93
WuS.JiangZ.KempinskiC.Eric NyboS.HusodoS.WilliamsR.et al. (2012). Engineering triterpene metabolism in tobacco. Planta236, 867–877. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1680-4
94
XieJ.LiM.ZengJ.LiX.ZhangD. (2021). Single-cell RNA sequencing profiles of stem-differentiating xylem in poplar. Plant Biotechnol. J.20 (3), 417–419. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13763
95
XuD.QiX.LiJ.HanX.WangJ.JiangY.et al. (2017). PzTAC and PzLAZY from a narrow-crown poplar contribute to regulation of branch angles. Plant Physiol. Biochem.118, 571–578. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.07.011
96
YanJ.AznarA.ChalvinC.BirdseyeD. S.BaidooE. E. K.EudesA.et al. (2018). Increased drought tolerance in plants engineered for low lignin and low xylan content. Biotechnol. Biofuels11, 195. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1196-7
97
ZhangB.ZhuW.DiaoS.WuX.LuJ.DingC.et al. (2019). The poplar pangenome provides insights into the evolutionary history of the genus. Commun. Biol.2, 215. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0474-7
98
ZhaoM.MorohashiK.HatlestadG.GrotewoldE.LloydA. (2008). The TTG1-bHLH-MYB complex controls trichome cell fate and patterning through direct targeting of regulatory loci. Development135, 1991–1999. doi: 10.1242/dev.016873
99
ZhouX.JacobsT. B.XueL.-J.HardingS. A.TsaiC.-J. (2015). Exploiting SNPs for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. New Phytol.208, 298–301. doi: 10.1111/nph.13470
100
ZhouR.JenkinsJ. W.ZengY.ShuS.JangH.HardingS. A.et al. (2023). Haplotype-resolved genome assembly of Populus tremula × P. alba reveals aspen-specific megabase satellite DNA. Plant J. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1111%2Ftpj.16454
Summary
Keywords
bioproducts, poplar, cell-type specificity, genome engineering, morphotype
Citation
Buell CR, Dardick C, Parrott W, Schmitz RJ, Shih PM, Tsai C-J and Urbanowicz B (2023) Engineering custom morpho- and chemotypes of Populus for sustainable production of biofuels, bioproducts, and biomaterials. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1288826. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1288826
Received
04 September 2023
Accepted
16 October 2023
Published
30 October 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Zenglin Zhang, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
Reviewed by
Danmei Liu, Shanxi University, China; Jun Hyung Lee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE), United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Buell, Dardick, Parrott, Schmitz, Shih, Tsai and Urbanowicz.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: C. Robin Buell, Robin.Buell@uga.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.