Abstract
Trichoderma strains used in vineyards for the control of grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) present a promising alternative to chemical products. Therefore, the isolation and characterization of new indigenous Trichoderma strains for these purposes is a valuable strategy to favor the adaptation of these strains to the environment, thus improving their efficacy in the field. In this research, a new Trichoderma species, Trichoderma carraovejensis, isolated from vineyards in Ribera de Duero (Spain) area, has been identified and phylogenetically analyzed using 20 housekeeping genes isolated from the genome of 24 Trichoderma species. A morphological description and comparison of the new species has also been carried out. In order to corroborate the potential of T. carraovejensis as a biological control agent (BCA), confrontation tests against pathogenic fungi, causing various GTDs, have been performed in the laboratory. The compatibility of T. carraovejensis with different pesticides and biostimulants has also been assessed. This new Trichoderma species demonstrates the ability to control pathogens such as Diplodia seriata, as well as high compatibility with powdered sulfur-based pesticides. In conclusion, the autochthonous species T. carraovejensis can be an effective alternative to complement the currently used strategies for the control of wood diseases in its region of origin.
1 Introduction
Trichoderma is a fungal genus that belongs to one of the largest classes of Sordariomycetes (phylum Ascomycota). Inside this class, the largest number of known genera is found within the order Hypocreales, which comprises half of the sequenced genomes in Sordariomycetes species. In this order, there are approximately 400 different species of the genus Trichoderma that are included. These data have been generated thanks to the evolution of molecular methods (). Most species of Trichoderma could be clustered into three big groups—clade Harzianum/Virens, section Trichoderma, and section Longibrachiatum—according to phylogenetic studies (Kubicek et al., 2019). Harzianum is one of the most important clades of species of this genus with application in biological control since most of the species applied in agriculture (Woo et al., 2014; Tyśkiewicz et al., 2022) have been putatively identified as Trichoderma harzianum (Proietti et al., 2018; ). The classification of Trichoderma species belonging to the Harzianum clade represents a great challenge for researchers since several issues make this task difficult to manage, e.g., the problem generated by its sexual stage or teleomorph, named Hypocrea; the identification of gamospecies, cryptic species; and most especially, the use of ITS for identification (). The general use of ITS regions (White et al., 1990) (ITS1 or ITS2) revealed that closely related Trichoderma species have the same ITS phylotypes, especially for infrageneric groups such as the Harzianum clade.
Recently, accurate and advisable new forms to identify a species were used to identify new Trichoderma isolates according to the International Commission on Trichoderma Taxonomy (ICTT, https://trichoderma.info/2021/04/26/molecular-identification-protocol-for-trichoderma/). Moreover, the species T. harzianum is the most common species (T. harzianum sensu stricto) in the Harzianum clade, but an inaccurate identification could lead to mistakes. A recent review showed that many Trichoderma species were not well identified or misclassified in the NCBI GenBank (). For example, T. harzianum T22 was re-identified as Trichoderma afroharzianum T22 and new species appeared in this clade such as Trichoderma lentiforme and T. lixii (). Nowadays, new genetic tools such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques and the standardized protocol of ICTT allow us to identify more accurately any species.
A great number of Trichoderma species have been shown to act as BCAs, due to their antagonistic ability against other pathogenic microorganisms (Rees et al., 2020; Mukherjee et al., 2022). The mechanisms of action of Trichoderma species acting as BCAs are very diverse, such as being able to produce extracellular hydrolytic enzymes (CAZymes) such as glucanases, chitinases, and proteases; degrade polymers of the cell wall and membrane of phytopathogens; secrete antimicrobial compounds (antibiosis); and compete for a niche (nutrients, tissues, etc.) (Zeilinger et al., 2016; Woo et al., 2022). These fungi also have the ability to stimulate plant growth and defense responses (; ). Trichoderma species are widely distributed, and they can be found in very diverse ecosystems, such as decaying wood, soil, bark, leaves, or the root system of plants, as well as endophytes in plant tissues (Kredics et al., 2021). Currently, Trichoderma is being introduced in viticulture as a promising preventative method in combination with other sustainable solutions against grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) (Mondello et al., 2018). Different studies have demonstrated its effectiveness against some of the most common grapevine trunk diseases, such as esca disease (; ), black-foot disease (; van Jaarsveld et al., 2021), or Botryosphaeria dieback (Silva-Valderrama et al., 2021; Pollard-Flamand et al., 2022), among others. Some Trichoderma isolates have demonstrated the ability to generate induced resistance in grapevine plants against the pathogen Erysiphe necator, which causes powdery mildew (Sawant et al., 2020). It was also demonstrated that Trichoderma was able to mycoparasite E. necator (Sawant et al., 2017). One of the most studied major commercialized biocontrol agents in viticulture is Trichoderma atroviride SC1, which has been described as an effective biocontrol agent against pathogens that cause grapevine trunk diseases (; Lazazzara et al., 2021; Leal et al., 2023). However, some studies have shown that these strains that are commercially used are not always working, so the search for new more effective Trichoderma species is needed (Martínez-Diz et al., 2021).
GTDs are causing severe damage in vineyards around the world, with their incidence increasing in recent years. In Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, the main wine-growing area in extension, symptoms of GTDs were shown in 38.3% of the varieties evaluated (). In Navarra, the incidence of GTDs in young tempranillo plants on different rootstocks was evaluated. The evaluation data for GTDs for the 2016, 2017, and 2018 seasons showed, in the case of eutypiosis, a cumulative incidence of over 10% for rootstock 161-49 C ().
In recent years, the use of effective chemicals against GTDs has been reduced due to the increasing restrictions related to the high toxicity of these products for health and the environment (), which has led to the search for solutions based on BCAs. Currently, commercial Trichoderma-based products account for 21% of registered products in the European Union () and 2.5% in the United States (). Therefore, Trichoderma represents a present and future alternative for agriculture through the use of different mechanisms of action against the main grapevine diseases.
One of the main strategies to be employed could be the use of indigenous organisms for the biocontrol of vineyard areas affected by GTDs. Some studies (; ) have shown a better adaptation of these BCAs to the environmental conditions and a greater capacity of protection and defense of the vine plants. So, this could be an alternative to pesticides and the use of microorganisms adapted to viticulture soil and management.
The aims of this study were to describe a new autochthonous Trichoderma species, strain T154, named after this study T. carraovejensis, which has been isolated from vineyards in Castilla y León region (Spain), and to analyze its potential as a BCA against GTDs, as well as its compatibility with other biostimulants and fungicides.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Fungal strains
Trichoderma sp. strain T154 was isolated from the wood of Vitis vinifera cv. Tempranillo, at Winery “Pago de Carraovejas” in Peñafiel, 41°35′51"N, 4°07′22"W (Valladolid, Spain) (). This strain was stored at the “Laboratorio de Diagnóstico de Plagas y Enfermedades Vegetales” (Plant and Pest Diagnostic Laboratory) (LDPEV) Universidad de León, Spain, under accession code ULET154.
The four Trichoderma strains used for morphological comparison purposes were as follows: T. lentiforme CBS 100542, Trichoderma atrobrunneum CECT 20730, Trichoderma guizhouense CECT 20731, and Trichoderma harzianum sensu stricto, which have been deposited at LDPEV under accession number ULET87 (University of Leoín, Spain). This strain (ULET87) was isolated from vineyard soils in Castilla y León region, and it has been assayed against Phaeoacremonium minimum during an in-vitro test with a significant percentage of biocontrol ().
Pathogens used in biocontrol assays, available at the LDPEV collection, belong to the main GTDs and most aggressive pathogens described in the literature (Martín and Cobos, 2007) in our region: Diplodia seriata (ULEP32), which is the most representative and aggressive pathogen of Botryosphaeria dieback disease, was isolated from plants with severe symptoms of xylem necrosis and shoot dieback in Castilla y León (Spain). Two of the main pathogens that cause Petri and esca diseases were also isolated: P. minimum Y038-05-3, a very aggressive isolate, was isolated from vine plants in Valle Benavente (Spain) (Martín and Martín, 2013) (stored at LDPEV under the accession number ULEA16); and finally, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora isolate Y-116-18-03c, another causal agent described as an important pathogen that causes symptoms of esca disease (Martín et al., 2012) (stored at LDPEV under the accession number ULEC21), was isolated.
2.2 Isolation of fungal strains
The T154 isolate was isolated in a previous study (), carried out in the Pago de Carraovejas winery (Peñafiel, Spain). Briefly, vine bark samples were taken from various plants using pruning shears, which were disinfected with 70% ethanol between samples. These wood pieces were preserved in clean plastic bags with hermetic seals at 4°C. The bark samples were then disinfected in a 1.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 min and then washed with plenty of sterile distilled water. These bark fragments were dried out for 15 min in a laminar flow chamber and cut with a sterile scalpel. Subsequently, seven wood chips (approx. 1–2 mm in diameter; approx. 0.5–1 cm in length) per plate were placed on Rose Bengal-Chloramphenicol Agar plates (Conda Laboratory, Madrid, Spain). These cultures were incubated at 25°C. After 3–5 days, mycelial growth was observed on each of the tissue pieces of wood, and those that were morphologically identified with Trichoderma were isolated and cultured on PDA plates (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany). The morphology of the Trichoderma strain was evaluated according to .
2.3 Trichoderma identification
For a preliminary identification of the Trichoderma isolates recovered in the present study, a strategy based on PCR amplification, nucleotide sequencing of ITS regions, and Blastn comparison to sequences in the non-redundant GenBank NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm-nih.gov), using the BLASTn program (http://www.ncibi.nlm.nigh.gov/BLAST), was followed as described previously ().
2.4 Genome sequencing
The genome sequence from the T154 isolate was generated by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea; https://dna.macrogen.com) using an Illumina platform. Sequence assemblies were generated using Platanus Allee (v2.2.2) software (). This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JAZAQE000000000. The version described in this paper is version JAZAQE010000000.
2.5 Phylogenetic analyses
Nucleotide sequences from 20 Trichoderma housekeeping (=HK) genes (Supplementary Table S1) retrieved from the genome of 24 Trichoderma species () were used to infer a Trichoderma species tree.
The sequences of each gene from all the Trichoderma spp. analyzed were individually aligned by MUSCLE software as implemented in MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018), and then the alignments were concatenated using the Sequence Matrix software (Vaidya et al., 2011). The resulting concatenated alignment was then subjected to maximum likelihood (ML) analysis as implemented in the program IQ-TREE version 1.6.12 (Nguyen et al., 2014). A second concatenated-partitioned tree was constructed by selecting for each gene the best-fit evolutionary nucleotide model deduced from the previous IQ-TREE analysis. Finally, both concatenated (non-partitioned and partitioned) alignments were subjected to ML analysis as implemented in IQ-TREE. Branch support was determined by bootstrap analysis using 1,000 pseudoreplicates. In addition, to assess the consistency of trees inferred from the 20 housekeeping genes, a gene concordance factor (GCF) analysis was performed as described by Minh et al. (2020) and .
In order to support these studies, three other trees were inferred using partial amino acid sequences deduced from coding sequences of three housekeeping genes [acl1 (ATP citrate lyase), rpb2 (RNA polymerase 2nd largest subunit), and tef1 (translation elongation factor 1-alpha)], which were retrieved from different species of (). These sequences were aligned by MUSCLE software as implemented in MEGA X, and the trees were generated with the program IQ-TREE version 1.6.12. Branch support was assessed by a bootstrap analysis based on 1,000 pseudoreplicates.
2.6 Growth rate trials and morphological characterization
Following the method described in Zheng et al. (2021) with some modifications, growth rate and optimal growth temperature were determined on 90-mm-diameter Petri dishes on three different culture media: potato dextrose agar (PDA), corn meal dextrose agar (CMD; 40 g of cornmeal, 20 g of glucose, 18 g of agar, 1 L of distilled water), and synthetic low nutrient agar (SNA; 1 g of KH2PO4, 1 g of KNO3, 0.5 g of MgSO4, 0.5 g of KCl, 0.2 g of glucose, 0.2 g of sucrose, 18 g of agar, 1 L of distilled water) at 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C. Plugs of 6 mm diameter were extracted from the edge of 7-day-old PDA plates and placed approximately 1 cm from the border of the Petri dishes. Colony radii were measured after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 7 days. The time point when mycelium completely covered the surface of the plate was also recorded during this assay. Furthermore, the morphological characters of the colonies, such as their appearance, color, and spore production, were recorded at the same time. The development of T154 was also verified at 37.5°C and 40°C, to determine the maximum temperature at which it can grow.
The T154 isolate was cultured in PDA for the evaluation of the microscopic morphology, and it was incubated at 25°C for a 72–96-h period. Pictures were taken with a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope connected to a Nikon DS-Fi3 digital camera.
Spore production was evaluated with four replicates of each of the following isolates, T154, T. harzianum, T. atrobrunneum, T. guizhouense, and T. lentiforme inoculated in PDA medium and incubated for 7 days at 25°C. Spores were collected by washing the Petri dish with distilled water and then filtering the spore suspension through a filter cloth. The spores were counted with a Neubauer chamber.
2.7 Antagonism assay in dual cultures
The antagonistic capacity of the T154 isolate was evaluated in vitro against the grapevine trunk disease pathogens P. minimum, P. chlamydospora, and D. seriata by performing dual culture tests. First, mycelial plugs (6 mm in diameter) of P. minimum and P. chlamydospora were obtained from the edge of 7-day-old PDA culture plates grown at 25°C. The plugs of these two pathogens were incubated for 14 days at 25°C in PDA to give them an advantage over Trichoderma, due to their slow growth rate. Subsequently, mycelial plugs (6 mm in diameter) of T154 were placed next to the pathogens, at a distance of 55 mm, from the edge of the cultures on 7-day-old PDA plates grown at 25°C. In the case of D. seriata, both mycelial plugs were placed at the same time on the plate at a distance of 55 mm since they showed a similar speed of development. Phaeoacremonium minimum, P. chlamydospora, and D. seriata were also incubated individually without the presence of Trichoderma under the same environmental conditions as the controls.
Dual cultures were incubated at 12°C in the dark to simulate the behavior of the T154–pathogen interaction at the time of pruning in the field, in which the pathogens have a greater possibility of penetrating the vine plant. Each control and Trichoderma/pathogen combination was replicated four times. Pathogen growth diameters were measured over a period of 30 to 40 days, depending on the development time required for each pathogen. The inhibition percentage caused by Trichoderma was calculated with the following equation (Úrbez-Torres et al., 2020):
where D1 is the diameter of the pathogen mycelium grown in the presence of Trichoderma and D2 is the diameter of the pathogen mycelium grown alone in the control plate.
2.8 Compatibility of Trichoderma carraovejensis with pesticides and biostimulants
An evaluation of the resistance of T. carraovejensis against five pesticides and three biostimulants (commonly used in commercial wineries) was carried out in this experiment. This assay helps us to preliminarily identify which products could affect the T. carraovejensis strain and reduce its efficacy as a biological control agent.
The test was carried out in 90 mm diameter Petri dishes with PDA medium that was amended with the concentrations of each product indicated in Table 1. Pesticides and biostimulants were added to the PDA-melted medium at 45°C, the medium was homogenized in a magnetic agitator at 500 rpm, and 15 ml of the solution was poured into each Petri dish. Subsequently, inoculation of each plate was carried out by placing a 6-mm diameter mycelium plug from T. carraovejensis of a 7-day-old PDA culture. PDA plates without adding any product were used as control. Four repetitions per treatment were made. Plates were kept at room temperature (24°C) and measurements of the diameters of each treatment were made on the 2nd, 4th, and 7th days after inoculation.
Table 1
| Trade name and use | Active ingredient | Manufacturer | Presentation | Application | Commercial dose | Dose used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solfoxidante (pesticide) | Sulfur 80% | Afepasa | Powder | Control of powdery mildew and phytopathogenic fungi | 20–30 kg/ha | 30 kg/ha |
| Kdos (pesticide) | Copper 35% | Certis | Powder | Control of pathogenic bacteria and fungi | 300 g/hl | 300 g/hl |
| Azufre Micronizado P300/100 (pesticide) | Sulfur 98.5% | Afepasa | Powder | Control of powdery mildew, red spider mite, and eriophyids | 20–30 kg/ha | 30 kg/ha |
| Heliosufre (pesticide) | Sulfur 72% w/v | Agrichem | Liquid | Control of powdery mildew, red spider mites, and eriophyids | 200–600 cc/hl | 600 cc/hl |
| Naturdai Nela (pesticide) | Cinnamon extract | Idai Nature | Liquid | Powdery mildew control, mite repellency | Foliar application: 200–300 cc/hl | 300 cc/hl |
| Algafer (biostimulant) | AA 4.5% + iron 5% | Idai Nature | Liquid | Natural biostimulant | Root application: 4–8 L/ha; foliar application: 200–400 cc/hl | 300 cc/hl |
| Brotaverd (biostimulant) | Copper 1.6%–1.8% + manganese 0.75%–0.8% + zinc 0.5%–0.6% | Idai Nature | Liquid | Natural biostimulant | Root application: 3–5 L/ha; foliar application: 300–500 cc/hl | 500 cc/hl |
| Sergomil L60 ECO (biostimulant) | Water-soluble copper (Cu) 5.5%; complexed copper (Cu) 2.8% | Servalesa | Liquid | Biostimulant with copper | 150–300 cc/hl | 300 cc/hl |
Active ingredients used in the trials, together with their form of presentation, application, commercial dose, and dose used.
2.9 Statistical analysis
All of the tests that were carried out were analyzed using IBM SPSS® Statistics 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). This software was used for the statistical analyses as follows: first, the Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check if there was normal distribution, then the homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Levene’s test, and one-way ANOVA was carried out to determine if there were significant differences. A post-hoc test (Duncan, p< 0.05) was performed to establish differences between groups.
3 Results
3.1 Phylogenetic analyses
The 25 Trichoderma species included in the phylogenetic analysis belong to 11 previously described lineages (Kubicek et al., 2019; ). To establish the position of the T154 isolate, we inferred a species tree based on a maximum likelihood analysis of concatenated alignments of 20 housekeeping genes that were retrieved in previous works from Trichoderma genome sequences corresponding to ex-type strains for each of the species used () as well as from the genome sequence of the T154 strain. In the resulting tree (Figure 1), our species of interest, T154, represents an individual branch within the Harzianum/Virens clade, with a bootstrap value of 100 and a GCF of 6. Therefore, these data support the assignment of the T154 isolate to a new species, which has been named T. carraovejensis. Furthermore, the topology of the phylogenetic tree was largely consistent with previously reported multispecies phylogenies for other Trichoderma species combinations (; Kubicek et al., 2019; ).
Figure 1
Three of the genetic markers (acl1, tef1, and rpb2) used in the study indicated above were analyzed separately. Thus, phylogenetic analyses of the acl1, tef1, and rpb2 partial genes from a wider isolate representation resulted in individual trees that are consistent (Supplementary Figures S1-S3) with the main tree of the 20 housekeeping genes (Figure 1). In the three individual trees, the bootstrap values obtained on the T. carraovejensis branch were ≥85%.
3.2 Growth rate trials
The results on the effect of different temperatures (25°C–40°C) on T. carraovejensis growth are summarized in Figure 2. The optimal growth temperature was estimated at 30°C for PDA and CMD culture media after 72 h from inoculation. For SNA, the optimal growth temperature varies between 25°C and 30°C, with no significant differences between these two temperatures. To conclude, the best media for T. carraovejensis growth are PDA and CMD, with no significant differences between them at 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C. However, there were significant growth differences between the first two media and SNA regardless of the temperature.
Figure 2

Growth rates of Trichoderma carraovejensis at 25°C, 30°C, 35°C, 37.5°C, and 40°C in potato dextrose agar (PDA), corn meal dextrose agar (CMD), and synthetic low-nutrient agar (SNA) media. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between culture media at the same temperature; Duncan test (p ≤ 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences between temperatures in the same culture medium; Duncan test (p ≤ 0.05).
Furthermore, there was a significantly lower development of T. carraovejensis at 37.5°C in all media, as well as complete inhibition of fungal development at 40°C (Figure 2).
Further experiments were carried out in order to compare T. carraovejensis with the different species that were closely related in the phylogenetic trees: Trichoderma harzianum ULET87, T. atrobrunneum CECT 20730, T. guizhouense CECT 20731, and T. lentiforme CBS 100542. First, the growth at 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C was assessed in different culture media.
After 72 h of inoculation at 25°C on PDA, the colony of T. carraovejensis reaches a radius of 57.5 ± 1 mm, showing significant differences only with T. harzianum. Under the same conditions in CMD and SNA, T. carraovejensis growth does not differ significantly from the other species. A radius of 62 ± 1 mm in CMD and 27 ± 1 mm in SNA was reached. At 30°C after 72 h of growth from inoculation, T. carraovejensis demonstrated great growth rates in the different culture media used, standing out in the case of the PDA (74.5 ± 1 mm) and SNA (32.5 ± 1 mm) media above the rest of the species and in the case of the CMD (75 ± 1 mm) obtaining the highest growth rates, although with less difference with respect to the other species. In the case of PDA and SNA, a significant difference was observed in the development of T. carraovejensis with respect to the rest of the species. Under these conditions, T. carraovejensis completely covered the plate in CMD medium. At 35°C after 72 h of inoculation, T. carraovejensis reached a radius of 33.25 ± 1 mm in PDA, which is significantly higher than those reached by T. harzianum (25.25 ± 1 mm), T. atrobrunneum (14.25 ± 1 mm), and T. guizhouense (16.75 ± 1 mm) but identical to that reached by T. lentiforme (33.25 ± 1 mm). In CMD, T. carraovejensis also reaches one of the highest radii (35 ± 1 mm), being significantly higher than those reached by T. harzianum (17 ± 1 mm) and T. atrobrunneum (7 ± 1 mm). In the case of the SNA medium, T. carraovejensis reached a radius (13.5 ± 1 mm) that was significantly higher than those reached by T. atrobrunneum (7 ± 1 mm), T. guizhouense (8.5 ± 1 mm), and T. lentiforme (10.75 ± 1 mm), but significantly lower than that reached by T. harzianum (17 ± 1 mm). For most of the strains analyzed, a drastic decrease in growth was observed in all the media used when the growth was assessed at 35°C (Supplementary Figure S4).
Finally, a comparison between conidia production was performed in this experiment. An evaluation of the production of conidia was done 7 days after inoculation on PDA medium at 30°C. Trichoderma carraovejensis was able to produce 1.13 × 109 conidia/ml, a higher value than the other species used for comparison: 1.75 × 108 conidia/ml of T. harzianum, 3.59 × 108 conidia/ml for T. atrobrunneum, 1.01 × 109 conidia/ml of T. guizhouense, and 2.19 × 108 conidia/ml for T. lentiforme, which represent 84.51%, 68.23%, 10.62%, and 80.62% less than T. carraovejensis, respectively (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Spore production, expressed as conidia/mL, in 7-day cultures on PDA of all species compared. Different letters indicate significant differences between Trichoderma species. Duncan test (p ≤ 0.05).
3.3 Morphological characterization
Morphological characterization for the new species T. carraovejensis at three different temperatures showed different features (Figure 4). First, T. carraovejensis varied depending on the growth temperature. Development at 25°C gave rise to the appearance of yellow-green pigments. Second, at 30°C, the pigments were greenish tones, and finally at 35°C, yellow-orange tones could be observed at the base of the culture medium (Figure 4).
Figure 4

(A1, B1, C1) reverse side of the Trichoderma carraovejensis plate at 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C, respectively. (A2, B2, C2) obverse side of the T. carraovejensis plate at 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C, respectively.
Thus, according to the results, the most useful culture medium for morphological comparison was PDA. At 30°C, all the compared species developed a growth pattern in concentric circles, with T. carraovejensis having the largest radius. At this temperature, T. carraovejensis began its development with a dense white mycelium. The first pigments to appear in the plate at 48 h were yellow tones, shortly after transforming to light greenish tones with subsequent darkening as the number of conidia in the plate increased. One of the main differences in comparison to the rest of the Trichoderma strains was observed after 7 days of growth when T. carraovejensis was the only one that no longer had areas with white mycelium. The entire plate was covered with conidia. This fact does not occur with the other species, which after 7 days continue to present alternate white mycelium zones between the conidia generation zones (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Morphology of Trichoderma carraovejensis in PDA at 30°C for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 7 days [reverse (R) and obverse (O) of the plate].
Comparison of morphological characterization was based on an in-vitro experiment at 35°C, which is the best range of temperature to differentiate T. carraovejensis from its closest Trichoderma-related species (Supplementary Figure S5). Trichoderma harzianum sensu stricto, T. atrobrunneum, and T. guizhouense were not able to colonize more than half of the Petri dish plate in PDA, so this is a morphological criterion that can discriminate close species as different ones. If we compare T. carraovejensis and T. lentiforme, the whole plate was covered after 7 days in PDA at 35°C, and similar concentrical rings could be visualized and green pale olive colors were identified. However, from the point of inoculation, T. lentiforme had a yellowish and pale white color, which was also observed at the border of the plate where white color was identified. However, T. carraovejensis presented a homogeneous green pale color except at the point of inoculation where a strong green color was identified; possibly, it was due to the high concentration of conidia in comparison to the rest of Trichoderma species as confirmed in Figure 3.
3.4 Taxonomy
T. carraovejensis—G. Carro-Huerga, L. Zanfaño, S. Gutiérrez, P.A. Casquero Luelmo. sp. nov. (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Observation of Trichoderma carraovejensis. (A) Cultures after 7 days at 30°C on PDA medium. (B) Cultures after 7 days at 30°C on CMD medium. (C) Cultures after 7 days at 30°C on SNA medium. (D) Pustules. (E–H) Conidiophores and phialides on PDA. (I) Conidia on PDA.
Etymology—Referring to the winery where the isolate was obtained: “Pago de Carraovejas”.
Typus—Spain, Castilla y León, Valladolid, Peñafiel, grapevine bark of vine plant (Vitis vinifera), G. Carro-Huerga (GenBank accession number JAZAQE000000000).
Fast growing colonies. At the beginning of the development of the fungus, white cottony pustules were formed, which subsequently sporulated, taking on greenish colors and a granular texture. Pallid green reverse. Mycelium composed of branched, septate and hyaline hyphae. The conidiophores presented paired lateral branches and lageniform to utriform phialides, elongated in shape and broader at the base, appeared individually or in groups of two or three, (10.6–)12.0–12.2(–16.2) × (2.1–)2.8–2.9(–3.0) μm, length/width ratio. The globose-shaped conidia with smooth edges showed greenish tones, 2.1–2.5 × 2.6–2.8 μm, length/width ratio (Figure 6).
Culture characteristics—Optimal growth temperature at 30°C. Colony radius on CMD after 72 h of growth: 62 ± 1 mm at 25°C, 75 ± 1 mm at 30°C, and 35 ± 1 mm at 35°C, covering the plate after 3 days at 30°C. Translucent mycelium at 48 h, appearance of the first yellow-green tones at 96 h with the formation of spores. Dense and greenish mycelium at 7 days with greater spore production at the edges of the plate. Colony radius on PDA after 72 h: 57.5 ± 1 mm at 25°C, 74.25 ± 1 mm at 30°C, and 33.25 ± 1 mm at 35°C, covering the plate after 4 days at 25°C and 30°C. Formation of dense mycelium in concentric circles. Appearance of the first spores at 48 h around the sowing disc. Green pigments that increase in intensity as the days pass since inoculation, which corresponds to an increase in the number of spores produced. Colony radius on SNA after 72 h: 27 ± 1 mm at 25°C, 32.5 ± 1 mm at 30°C, and 13.5 ± 1 mm at 35°C, covering the plate after 7 days at 25°C and 30°C. Formation of a sparse mycelium with greenish pigments after 48 h. The production of spores in PDA at 7 days was 1.13 × 109 spores/ml.
Notes—In this study, T. carraovejensis was isolated from grapevine bark. Trichoderma carraovejensis was differentiated from other species by phylogenetic analysis of the sequences of 20 housekeeping genes from 24 different Trichoderma species and by morphological comparison with T. harzianum, T. atrobrunneum, T. guizhouense, and T. lentiforme, the species closest to it in the generated phylogenetic tree.
3.5 Antagonism assay in dual cultures
The levels of antagonism of T. carraovejensis against the GTD pathogens P. minimum and P. chlamydospora were evaluated after 38 days of growth and for D. seriata after 31 days. This was due to the slow development of the isolates at 12°C. The mean percentages of radial growth inhibition (RI) for P. minimum, P. chlamydospora, and D. seriata were 21.04%, 15.34%, and 34.08%, respectively. Trichoderma carraovejensis exhibited the best inhibition values against the pathogen D. seriata when assays were carried out at 12°C (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Dual culture antagonism experiment. The C1, C2, and C3 plates show Phaeoacremonium minimum, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, and Diplodia seriata controls, respectively. D. 1a and D. 1b show antagonistic activity of T. carraovejensis against P. minimum and D. 2a and D. 2b show antagonistic activity of T. carraovejensis against P. chlamydospora after 38 days of growth on PDA at 12°C, and D. 3a and D. 3b show antagonistic activity of T. carraovejensis against D. seriata after 31 days of growth on PDA at 12°C.
Trichoderma was able to stop the development of P. minimum but without colonizing it. In the case of P. chlamydospora, T. carraovejensis stopped the growth of the pathogen, and the biocontrol agent was able to colonize the pathogenic fungus, growing and producing spores on it. As for D. seriata, a clear arrest of the development of the pathogen and an overgrowth of Trichoderma on it were observed.
3.6 Compatibility of Trichoderma carraovejensis with pesticides and biostimulants
Assays performed with T. carraovejensis grown in the presence of different products showed significant differences (p< 0.05) among pesticides and biostimulants. The colony diameter in the control plate (=Trichoderma growing alone in PDA medium) reached the highest value, 72.25 ± 1 mm, and this value was significantly higher in comparison to the rest of the tested products. Trichoderma carraovejensis demonstrated the greatest compatibility with the 80% sulfur-based product (62.75 ± 1 mm) and differed significantly to 98.5% sulfur (51.00 ± 1 mm) and the products described in Table 1. Trichoderma reached a diameter of 30.88 ± 1 mm in combination with the product based on amino acids and iron. Very similar values were obtained with the copper-based products, with no significant differences between Cu 35% (14.75 ± 1 mm) and Cu5.5 + Cu2.8 (11.88 ± 1 mm) and between the latter and Cu+Mn+Zn (10.00 ± 1 mm). No significant differences were also observed between Cu+Mn+Zn and 72% sulfur (7.13 ± 1 mm). Cinnamon showed the lowest compatibility with T. carraovejensis, inhibiting its growth (Figures 8, 9).
Figure 8

Growth diameter of Trichoderma carraovejensis in the media with the different products used 2 days after inoculation. Different letters indicate significant differences between the products used. Duncan test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 9

Development of Trichoderma carraovejensis 2, 5, and 7 days after inoculation in the culture media with the different pesticides and biostimulants used in the trial.
4 Discussion
In this study, a new autochthonous Trichoderma species, isolated from grapevine plants in Castilla y León (Spain), has been characterized and described. A multigene phylogenetic analysis was performed based on 20 housekeeping genes (Supplementary Table S1). The phylogenetic analysis led to the conclusion that T. carraovejensis maps inside the Harzianum/Virens clade (
In terms of microscopic morphological comparison, T. carraovejensis presents lageniform to lectiform phialides in comparison to T. guizhouense which has phialides mostly in whorls (Korkom and Yıldız, 2023). Trichoderma harzianum sensu stricto presents phialides ampulliform to lageniform and conidia globose and subglobose and is smaller in comparison to T. carraovejensis. However, both of them have pyramidal conidiophores. If Trichoderma atrobruneum is compared with T. carraovejensis, both of them present widely spaced branches, terminating in a whorl of two–five phialides, and have a similar shape and form of conidiophores so it is necessary to use a genetic identification tool (
The description of this new species has also been based on the comparison of growth and development rates versus species mapping close to T. carraovejensis in the phylogenetic trees (T. guizhouense, T. lentiforme, T. harzianum, and T. atrobrunneum). This study includes comparative phylogenetic data analysis and also evaluates morphological characters, as recommended, in order to totally differentiate Trichoderma strains (Li et al., 2013). Thus, according to the genetic, morphological, growth rate, and spore production differences, it was possible to confirm a new species that has been described in this complex clade (
Spore production is an important character in the selection of a new potential biocontrol species since all of the Trichoderma-based products are presented as spore suspensions (Woo et al., 2014). In the present case, T. carraovejensis produces a high and significantly different number of spores in comparison to its neighbor species, especially T. harzianum sensu stricto, which has been described for mass production (Mahamud, 2019). This is another parameter that would allow us to easily produce Trichoderma spores at a large scale.
The optimal growth temperature of T. carraovejensis is 30°C. At this temperature, T. carraovejensis shows a significantly higher growth rate than the rest of the species, coinciding with previous reports where strains of this clade are adapted to warmer climates (
Trichoderma carraovejensis has been isolated from grapevine wood in a plot in Ribera del Duero PDO (protected designation of origin) (Spain) (
The inhibition results obtained for D. seriata did not greatly differ from those obtained in similar tests with other Trichoderma species, even though those were mostly carried out at temperatures approximately 25°C (
Combined testing of biological control agents and pesticides or biostimulants may result in increased efficacy of these compounds to control and eradicate fungal diseases (
5 Conclusion
In the present study, we have concluded, based on extensive and diverse phylogenetic analyses, that the vineyard soil isolate T154 corresponded to a new species, which has been named T. carraovejensis. The different experimental approaches used in this study and in previous studies allowed us to present this species as a new and promising option for the control of GTDs. Thus, T. carraovejensis exhibits a good adaptation to different temperatures, has great potential as a preventative method in pruning wounds against GTDs, and also has a high degree of compatibility with diverse chemical products used for this purpose.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. Housekeeping genes of T. carraovejensis T154 generated during the present study are deposited in the NCBI/Bankit/GenBank repository under the accession numbers listed in the Supplementary Table S1.
Author contributions
LZ: Writing – original draft, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. GC-H: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation. ÁR-G: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation. SM-P: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation. RC: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation. SG: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. PC: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The grant awarded to LZ (FPU 20/03040) comes from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Spain). We thank Pago de Carraovejas Winery for the projects “Solución global para mejorar la producción vitivinícola frente al cambio climático basada en robótica, en tecnología IT y en estrategias biotecnológicas y del manejo del viñedo (Acronym: GLOBALVITI; Reference: IDI-20160746)” and “Estudio de nuevos factores relacionados con el suelo, la planta y la microbiota enológica que influyen en el equilibrio de la acidez de los vinos y en su garantía de calidad y estabilidad en climas cálidos (Acronym: LOWpHWINE; Reference: IDI-20210391)” that was granted by the Centro para el Desarrollo tecnológico Industrial (CDTI).
Acknowledgments
Thanks to the Pago de Carraovejas team and especially to Eva Navascues, Elena Rivilla and Ana Tena for their technical support, as well as the research staff of the GUIIAS group.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1388841/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Álvarez-PérezJ. M.González-GarcíaS.CobosR.OlegoM.Á.IbañezA.Díez-GalánA.et al. (2017). Use of endophytic and rhizosphere actinobacteria from grapevine plants to reduce nursery fungal graft infections that lead to young grapevine decline. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.83, 1–16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01564-17
2
AmareshY. S.ChennappaG.AvinashS.NaikM. K.SreenivasaM. Y. (2019). ““Trichoderma-a new strategy in combating agriculture problems,”,” in New and future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Microbes in Soil, Crop and Environmental Sustainability (Elsevier), 235–244. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818258-1.00015-7
3
BanikS.Pérez-de-luqueA. (2017). In vitro effects of copper nanoparticles on plant pathogens, beneficial microbes and crop plants. Spanish J. Agric. Res.15, 1–15. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2017152-10305
4
BarreraV. A.IannoneL.RomeroA. I.ChaverriP. (2021). Expanding the Trichoderma harzianum species complex: Three new species from Argentine natural and cultivated ecosystems. Mycologia113, 1136–1155. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2021.1947641
5
BerbegalM.Ramón-AlbalatA.LeónM.ArmengolJ. (2020). Evaluation of long-term protection from nursery to vineyard provided by Trichoderma atroviride SC1 against fungal grapevine trunk pathogens. Pest Manag Sci.76, 967–977. doi: 10.1002/ps.5605
6
BerlanasC.Andrés-SodupeM.López-ManzanaresB.Maldonado-GonzálezM. M.GramajeD. (2018). Effect of white mustard cover crop residue, soil chemical fumigation and Trichoderma spp. root treatment on black-foot disease control in grapevine. Pest Manag Sci.74, 2864–2873. doi: 10.1002/ps.5078
7
BigotG.SivilottiP.StecChinaM.LujanC.FrecceroA.MosettiD. (2020). Long-term effects of Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma gamsii on the prevention of esca in different vineyards of Northeastern Italy. Crop Prot.137, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105264
8
Biopesticide Active Ingredients | US EPA (2024). Available online at: https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/biopesticide-active-ingredients (Accessed January 26, 2024).
9
BlundellR.ArreguinM.EskalenA. (2021). In vitro evaluation of grapevine endophytes, epiphytes and sap micro-organisms for potential use to control grapevine trunk disease pathogens. Phytopathol. Mediterr60, 535–548. doi: 10.36253/phyto-12500
10
BravoS.Jiménez-BallestaR.AmorósJ. A.Pérez-de-los-ReyesC.VillenaJ.García-NavarroF. J. (2023). Accumulation, distribution pattern and potential contamination of sulphur in vineyard soils of the Valdepeñas protected denomination origin. Sci. Total Environ.904, 166642. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166642
11
CaiF.DruzhininaI. S. (2021). In honor of John Bissett: authoritative guidelines on molecular identification of Trichoderma. Fungal Divers.107, 1–69. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00464-4
12
Carro-HuergaG.CompantS.GorferM.CardozaR. E.SchmollM.GutiérrezS.et al. (2020). Colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by the endophyte Trichoderma sp. strain T154: biocontrol activity against Phaeoacremonium minimum. Front. Plant Sci.11, 1–18. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01170
13
Carro-HuergaG.Mayo-PrietoS.Rodríguez-GonzálezÁ.Álvarez-GarcíaS.GutiérrezS.CasqueroP. A. (2021). The influence of temperature on the growth, sporulation, colonization, and survival of Trichoderma spp. in grapevine pruning wounds. Agronomy11, 1–21. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11091771
14
Carro-HuergaG.Mayo-PrietoS.Rodríguez-GonzálezÁ.CardozaR. E.GutiérrezS.CasqueroP. A. (2023). Vineyard management and physicochemical parameters of soil affect native Trichoderma populations, sources of biocontrol agents against Phaeoacremonium minimum. Plants12. doi: 10.3390/plants12040887
15
Chacón-VozmedianoJ. L.GramajeD.LeónM.ArmengolJ.MoralJ.Izquierdo-CañasP. M.et al. (2021). Cultivar susceptibility to natural infections caused by fungal grapevine trunk pathogens in la mancha designation of origin (Spain). Plants10, 1–14. doi: 10.3390/plants10061171
16
ChaverriP.Branco-RochaF.JaklitschW.GazisR.DegenkolbT.SamuelsG. J. (2015). Systematics of the Trichoderma harzianum species complex and the re-identification of commercial biocontrol strains. Mycologia107, 558–590. doi: 10.3852/14-147
17
DecoinM. (2001). Grapevine products: news on withdrawals and restrictions. Phytoma543, 28–33.
18
DruzhininaI. S.KubicekC. P.Komoń-ZelazowskaM.MulawT. B.BissettJ. (2010) The Trichoderma harzianum demon: complex speciation history resulting in coexistence of hypothetical biological species, recent agamospecies and numerous relict lineages. Available online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-94
19
DruzhininaI. S.Seidl-SeibothV.Herrera-EstrellaA.HorwitzB. A.KenerleyC. M.MonteE.et al. (2011). Trichoderma: The genomics of opportunistic success. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.9, 749–759. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2637
20
EU Pesticides Database (2024). Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/start/screen/active-substances (Accessed January 26, 2024).
21
GenevaI. I.CuzzoB.FaziliT.JavaidW. (2019). Normal body temperature: a systematic review. Open Forum Infect. Dis.6, 1–17. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz032
22
GramajeD.ArmengolJ.BarajasE.BerbegalM.ChacónJ. L.CibriainJ. F.et al. (2020). Guía sobre las enfermedades fúngicas de la madera de la vid. (Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación - Gobierno de España). Available at: https://servicio.mapama.gob.es/tienda/.
23
GramajeD.Úrbez-TorresJ. R.SosnowskiM. R. (2018). Managing grapevine trunk diseases with respect to etiology and epidemiology: current strategies and future prospects. Plant Dis.102, 12–39. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-17-0512-FE
24
GutiérrezS.McCormickS. P.CardozaR. E.KimH.-S.YuguerosL. L.VaughanM. M.et al. (2021). Distribution, function, and evolution of a gene essential for trichothecene toxin biosynthesis in Trichoderma. Front. Microbiol.12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.791641
25
HarmanG. E.KubicekC. P. (1998a). “Trichoderma and gliocladium,” in Basic Biology, Taxonomy and Genetics (London: CRC Press), vol. 1. . doi: 10.1201/9781482295320
26
HarmanG. E.KubicekC. P. (1998b). “Trichoderma and gliocladium,” in Enzymes, Biological Control and commercial applications, vol. 2. (CRC Press). doi: 10.1201/9781482267945
27
HatvaniL.HomaM.ChenthamaraK.CaiF.KocsubéS.AtanasovaL.et al. (2019). Agricultural systems as potential sources of emerging human mycoses caused by Trichoderma: a successful, common phylotype of Trichoderma longibrachiatum in the frontline. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.366, 246. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz246
28
HatvaniL.ManczingerL.VágvölgyiC.KredicsL. (2013). “Trichoderma as a human pathogen,” in Trichoderma: biology and applications (CABI Digital Library), 292–313. doi: 10.1079/9781780642475.0292
29
HermosaR.CardozaR. E.RubioM. B.GutiérrezS.MonteE. (2014). Secondary metabolism and antimicrobial metabolites of Trichoderma (Elsevier). doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59576-8.00010-2
30
JaklitschW. M.VoglmayrH. (2015). Biodiversity of trichoderma (Hypocreaceae) in Southern Europe and Macaronesia. Stud. Mycol80, 1–87. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.11.001
31
JangS.KwonS. L.LeeH.JangY.ParkM. S.LimY. W.et al. (2018). New report of three unrecorded species in Trichoderma harzianum species complex in Korea. Mycobiology46, 177–184. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2018.1497792
32
KajitaniR.YoshimuraD.OkunoM.MinakuchiY.KagoshimaH.FujiyamaA.et al. (2019). Platanus-allee is a de novo haplotype assembler enabling a comprehensive access to divergent heterozygous regions. Nat. Commun.10, 1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09575-2
33
KorkomY.YıldızA. (2023). First report of Trichoderma guizhouense isolated from soil in Türkiye. J. Plant Dis. Prot13, 619–625. doi: 10.1007/s41348-023-00828-3
34
KredicsL.NaeimiS.HatvaniL.VágvölgyiC.CaiF.DruzhininaI. S.et al. (2021). ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’ in the shades of green: the genus Trichoderma in the spotlight. Indian Phytopathol.74, 403–411. doi: 10.1007/s42360-021-00352-0
35
KubicekC. P.SteindorffA. S.ChenthamaraK.ManganielloG.HenrissatB.ZhangJ.et al. (2019). Evolution and comparative genomics of the most common Trichoderma species. BMC Genomics20, 1–24. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5680-7
36
KumarS.StecherG.LiM.KnyazC.TamuraK. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol.35, 1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096
37
LadiE.ShuklaN.BohraY.TiwariA. K.KumarJ. (2020). Copper tolerant Trichoderma asperellum increases bio-efficacy of copper against Phytophthora infestans in dual combination. Phytoparasitica48, 357–370. doi: 10.1007/s12600-020-00804-9
38
LazazzaraV.VicelliB.BueschlC.ParichA.PertotI.SchuhmacherR.et al. (2021). Trichoderma spp. volatile organic compounds protect grapevine plants by activating defense-related processes against downy mildew. Physiol. Plant172, 1950–1965. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13406
39
LealC.GramajeD.FontaineF.RichetN.Trotel-AzizP.ArmengolJ. (2023). Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis PTA-271 and Trichoderma atroviride SC1 to control Botryosphaeria dieback and black-foot pathogens in grapevine propagation material. Pest Manag Sci.79, 1674–1683. doi: 10.1002/ps.7339
40
LiQ. R.TanP.JiangY. L.HydeK. D.MckenzieE. H. C.BahkaliA. H.et al. (2013). A novel Trichoderma species isolated from soil in Guizhou, T. guizhouense. Mycol Prog.12, 167–172. doi: 10.1007/s11557-012-0821-2
41
MahamudM. (2019). Large scale production and increased shelf life of Trichoderma harzianum inoculums in semi solid medium. Malaysian J. Sustain. Agric.3, 05–07. doi: 10.26480/mjsa.01.2019.05.07
42
MartínM. T.CobosR. (2007). Identification of fungi associated with grapevine decline in Castilla y León (Spain). Phytopathol. Mediterr46, 18–25. doi: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-1854
43
MartínM. T.CobosR.MartínL.López-EnríquezL. (2012). Real-Time PCR detection of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.78, 3985–3991. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07360-11
44
MartínL.MartínM. T. (2013). Characterization of fungicide resistant isolates of Phaeoacremonium aleophilum infecting grapevines in Spain. Crop Prot.52, 141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2013.05.023
45
Martínez-DizM.delP.Díaz-LosadaE.Díaz-FernándezÁ.Bouzas-CidY.GramajeD. (2021). Protection of grapevine pruning wounds against Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Diplodia seriata by commercial biological and chemical methods. Crop Prot.143, 105465. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105465
46
MayoS.GutiérrezS.MalmiercaM. G.LorenzanaA.CampeloM. P.HermosaR.et al. (2015). Influence of Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma spp. in growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the induction of plant defense-related genes. Front. Plant Sci.6, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00685
47
Mayo-PrietoS.SquarzoniA.Carro-HuergaG.Porteous-ÁlvarezA. J.GutiérrezS.CasqueroP. A. (2022). Organic and conventional bean pesticides in development of autochthonous Trichoderma strains. J. Fungi8, 1–18. doi: 10.3390/jof8060603
48
MinhB. Q.HahnM. W.LanfearR. (2020). New methods to calculate concordance factors for phylogenomic datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol.37, 2727–2733. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa106
49
MondelloV.SongyA.BattistonE.PintoC.CoppinC.Trotel-AzizP.et al. (2018). Grapevine trunk diseases: a review of fifteen years of trials for their control with chemicals and biocontrol agents. Plant Dis.102, 1189–1217. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-17-1181-FE
50
MukherjeeP. K.Mendoza-MendozaA.ZeilingerS.HorwitzB. A. (2022). Mycoparasitism as a mechanism of Trichoderma-mediated suppression of plant diseases. Fungal Biol. Rev.39, 15–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2021.11.004
51
NguyenL.SchmidtH. A.von HaeselerA.MinhB. Q. (2014). IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution32, 268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300
52
Pollard-FlamandJ.BouléJ.HartM.Úrbez-TorresJ. R. (2022). Biocontrol activity of Trichoderma species isolated from grapevines in British Columbia against botryosphaeria dieback fungal pathogens. J. Fungi8, 1–22. doi: 10.3390/jof8040409
53
Porteous-ÁlvarezA. J.Fernández-MarcosA.Ramírez-LozanoD.Mayo-PrietoS.CardozaR. E.GutiérrezS.et al. (2023). Native Trichoderma isolates from soil and rootstock to Fusarium spp. control and growth promotion of Humulus lupulus L. plantlets. Agric. (Switzerland)13, 13. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13030720
54
PreiningerC.SauerU.BejaranoA.BerningerT. (2018). Concepts and applications of foliar spray for microbial inoculants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.102, 7265–7282. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9173-4
55
ProiettiS.WooS. L.ManganielloG.SaccoA.ErcolanoM. R.VinaleF.et al. (2018). Modulation of tomato response to Rhizoctonia solani by Trichoderma harzianum and its secondary metabolite harzianic acid. Front. Microbiol.1. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01966
56
RamanagoudaG.NaikM. K. (2021). Compatibility studies of indigenous Trichoderma isolates with pesticides. Indian Phytopathol.74, 241–248. doi: 10.1007/s42360-021-00325-3
57
ReesH. J.BashirN.DrakulicJ.CromeyM. G.BaileyA. M.FosterG. D. (2020). Identification of native endophytic Trichoderma spp. for investigation of in vitro antagonism towards Armillaria mellea using synthetic- and plant-based substrates. J. Appl. Microbiol.131, 392–403. doi: 10.1111/jam.14938
58
RusinC.CavalcantiF. R.LimaP. C. G.FariaC. M. D. R.AlmançaM. A. K.BotelhoR. V. (2020). Control of the fungi Lasiodiplodia theobromae, the causal agent of dieback, in cv. syrah grapevines. Acta Sci. Agron.43, e44785. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.44785
59
SaniI.KurniaY. W.SinthyaH. C.AnthonyR.SitumorangE. C.UtomoC.et al. (2022). Exploring the potency of microalgae-based biofertilizer and its impact on oil palm seedlings growth. Agrivita44, 139–151. doi: 10.17503/Agrivita
60
SawantI. S.WadkarP. N.GhuleS. B.RajguruY. R.SalunkheV. P.SawantS. D. (2017). Enhanced biological control of powdery mildew in vineyards by integrating a strain of Trichoderma afroharzianum with sulphur. Biol. Control114, 133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.08.011
61
SawantI. S.WadkarP. N.GhuleS. B.SalunkheV. P.ChavanV.SawantS. D. (2020). Induction of systemic resistance in grapevines against powdery mildew by Trichoderma asperelloides strains. Australas. Plant Pathol.49, 107–117. doi: 10.1007/s13313-020-00679-8
62
Silva-ValderramaI.ToapantaD.de los Angeles MicconoM.LolasM.DíazG. A.CantuD.et al. (2021). Biocontrol potential of grapevine endophytic and rhizospheric fungi against trunk pathogens. Front. Microbiol.11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.614620
63
SinghA.SrivastavaS.SinghH. B. (2007). Effect of substrates on growth and shelf life of Trichoderma harzianum and its use in biocontrol of diseases. Bioresour Technol.98, 470–473. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.01.002
64
TyśkiewiczR.NowakA.OzimekE.Jaroszuk-ścisełJ. (2022). Trichoderma: the current status of its application in agriculture for the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens and stimulation of plant growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 1–28. doi: 10.3390/ijms23042329
65
Úrbez-TorresJ. R.TomaselliE.Pollard-FlamandJ.BoulÉJ.GerinD.PollastroS. (2020). Characterization of Trichoderma isolates from southern Italy, and their potential biocontrol activity against grapevine trunk disease fungi. Phytopathol. Mediterr59, 425–439. doi: 10.14601/Phyto-11273
66
VaidyaG.LohmanD. J.MeierR. (2011). SequenceMatrix: Concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics27, 171–180. doi: 10.1111/cla.2011.27.issue-2
67
van JaarsveldW. J.HalleenF.BesterM. C.PierronR. J. G.StempienE.MostertL. (2021). Investigation of Trichoderma species colonization of nursery grapevines for improved management of black foot disease. Pest Manag Sci.77, 397–405. doi: 10.1002/ps.6030
68
WhiteT.BrunsT.LeeS.TaylorJ. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Acad. press315–321, 315–322. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
69
WooS. L.HermosaR.LoritoM.MonteE. (2022). Trichoderma: a multipurpose, plant-beneficial microorganism for eco-sustainable agriculture. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.21, 312–326. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00819-5
70
WooS. L.RuoccoM.VinaleF.NigroM.MarraR.LombardiN.et al. (2014) Trichoderma-based Products and their Widespread Use in Agriculture. Available online at: www.pesticideinfo.org/. doi: 10.2174/1874437001408010071
71
ZeilingerS.GruberS.BansalR.MukherjeeP. K. (2016). Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma – Chemistry meets genomics. Fungal Biol. Rev.30, 74–90. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2016.05.001
72
ZhengH.QiaoM.LvY.DuX.ZhangK. Q.YuZ. (2021). New species of Trichoderma isolated as endophytes and saprobes from Southwest China. J. Fungi7, 1–50. doi: 10.3390/jof7060467
Summary
Keywords
Trichoderma carraovejensis, phylogeny, biological control, grapevine trunk diseases, ecology
Citation
Zanfaño L, Carro-Huerga G, Rodríguez-González Á, Mayo-Prieto S, Cardoza RE, Gutiérrez S and Casquero PA (2024) Trichoderma carraovejensis: a new species from vineyard ecosystem with biocontrol abilities against grapevine trunk disease pathogens and ecological adaptation. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1388841. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1388841
Received
20 February 2024
Accepted
16 April 2024
Published
21 May 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Amita Kaundal, Utah State University, United States
Reviewed by
Livio Torta, University of Palermo, Italy
David Vela-Corcia, University of Malaga, Spain
Niroshini Gunasinghe, University of Southern Queensland, Australia
Sujata Singh Yadav, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 Zanfaño, Carro-Huerga, Rodríguez-González, Mayo-Prieto, Cardoza, Gutiérrez and Casquero.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pedro A. Casquero, pacasl@unileon.es
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.