Abstract
Introduction:
Granulated straw incorporation is a novel approach designed to enhance straw decomposition and improve soil fertility. However, the effects of different straw incorporation amounts under deep tillage and rotary tillage on soil available nutrients, soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions, bacterial communities, and crop yield remain unclear.
Methods:
In a 3-year field experiment, three granulated maize straw amounts (G1, 2,250; G2, 4,500; and G3, 6,750 kg hm−2) and two tillage methods (T, deep tillage; and R, rotary tillage) were applied to evaluate their impacts on SOC fractions, available nutrients, bacterial communities, and flue-cured tobacco yield.
Results and Discussion:
Compared with conventional tillage (RG0), granulated straw incorporation significantly increased SOC content. Over the 3 years, the SOC content in the 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil layers increased by 4.40%–23.46% and 5.36%–39.21% (p < 0.05), respectively. Moreover, the incorporation of higher straw amounts significantly increased the content of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC). Specifically, the RG3 treatment significantly increased DOC content in both soil layers in 2016 and 2017, while TG3 showed the greatest increase in 2018. In addition, RG2 and RG3 consistently enhanced MBC content across both layers throughout the 3 years. During the tobacco growing period, soil ammonium nitrogen (NH4+–N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−–N), and available potassium (AK) contents increased with higher straw amounts in both soil layers. The RG2 treatment notably enhanced the bacterial α diversity and increased the relative abundance of phyla Firmicutes and Gemmatimonadota in the 20–40-cm layer. Network analysis identified AK as a key nutrient influencing bacterial community structure under both tillage methods. Structural equation modeling further revealed that SOC fractions were primarily regulated by nutrient factors under rotary tillage, while under deep tillage, bacterial richness and AK played dominant roles. To improve soil quality and crop productivity, the incorporation of a medium amount of granulated straw combined with rotary tillage is recommended as a sustainable practice for flue-cured tobacco cultivation.
1 Introduction
Over 3 billion tons of straw is produced globally each year (Wang et al., 2021). China, as a major agricultural country, generates over one-third of the world’s straw. However, in the eastern and southern provinces of China, more than 30% of this straw is either left in the fields or burned outdoors, leading to considerable resource waste and environmental pollution (Wang et al., 2018). After the Chinese government issued the ban on straw burning (State Council of China, 2014), the efficient utilization of straw has become a key strategy for managing the large quantities generated annually.
Granulated straw returning is a novel straw management method in which straw is crushed, extruded, and granulated before being returned to the field. This approach not only accelerates soil fertility enhancement but also offers a practical solution for large-scale straw due to its higher decomposition rate (31.68% greater than that of conventional crushed straw) and higher bulk density (nearly five times that of conventional crushed straw) (Wang et al., 2017a). It has thus been regarded as a win–win strategy for resource recycling and environmental protection. Granulated straw returning with different tillage methods creates a distinct distribution of soil nutrients and organic carbon pool by affecting the soil physicochemical and biological characteristics (Zhang et al., 2017). Rotary tillage has been shown to rapidly increase soil available nutrients and soil organic carbon (SOC) in the 0–15-cm soil layer– (Zhang L. et al., 2018), while deep tillage is more effective for long-term carbon sequestration in the 20–40- and 40–60-cm soil layers (). In addition, the amount of incorporated straw is also a critical factor influencing changes in soil nutrients, SOC, and microbial communities. It is widely recognized that increasing straw incorporation can enhance soil available nutrients and SOC content due to the high concentrations of C, N, P, and K present in straw (). The compact volume of granulated straw allows for greater application amounts compared to conventional straw. However, the appropriate amount of granulated straw to incorporate under rotary tillage and deep tillage for enhancing soil available nutrients and SOC content remains inadequately studied.
Soil microorganisms play a crucial role in straw decomposition and nutrient cycling () and are widely regarded as sensitive biological indicators of soil fertility (; ). Straw incorporation has been shown to positively impact microbial activity and enhance microbial diversity (Zhang X. F. et al., 2018). As a rich carbon source, decomposing straw stimulates SOC turnover and promotes the abundance and diversity of carbon-related microorganisms (). However, the role of tillage in regulating soil microbial communities remains controversial. Some studies have highlighted that tillage methods with minimal soil disturbance are more conducive to increasing the abundance of specific soil microbial functional groups, promoting greater soil microbial diversity, and enhancing the metabolic activity of soil microbial communities (; Wang et al., 2017c). Nevertheless, the benefits of deep tillage for improving soil microbial biomass and activity have also been confirmed (). The proportions of soil solid, liquid, and gas phases adjusted by deep tillage provided a more suitable environment for microbes (). Tillage methods can also change the distribution of straw in the soil, thereby indirectly impacting soil microbial communities. indicated that straw incorporation with deep tillage has significant potential for enhancing microbial community characteristics in both subsoil and topsoil. Furthermore, in short-term experiments, the soil bacterial community is widely considered a reliable bioindicator for assessing changes in the soil environment owing to its highly sensitive response to environmental shifts. Based on existing theories, this study focuses on analyzing how the bacterial community of granulated straw may potentially respond differently under two different tillage methods and their interactions with soil available nutrients and SOC fractions.
Tobacco is a kind of high-biomass cash crop where the above-ground portions of the plant are harvested, and it has substantial soil nutrient demands. Specifically, in continuous tobacco cropping systems, tobacco plants selectively absorb certain soil nutrients, leading to reductions in soil mineral nitrogen (NH4+–N and NO3−–N), available potassium (AK), and SOC (Wang et al., 2022). Additionally, due to the high lignification of tobacco roots and the risk of soil-borne diseases, tobacco residues are not suitable for direct field return (; Wang et al., 2017b). Consequently, long-term continuous cultivation often results in soil degradation, ultimately reducing crop yield and quality. Given this background, we hypothesize that granulated straw combined with an appropriate tillage method can serve as an effective strategy for improving soil fertility in tobacco fields. However, the effects of different incorporation amounts and burial depths on soil nutrients, SOC fractions, and microbial communities remain poorly understood. Here, two different tillage methods (deep tillage and rotary tillage) combined with three straw granulation amounts of low, medium, and high were set to explore 1) changes in soil available nutrients, SOC fractions, and soil bacterial community under different treatments; 2) the interactions between soil available nutrients, SOC fractions, and soil bacterial communities; and 3) an optimal granulated straw incorporation strategy to improve soil quality and enhance tobacco yield.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Site description
A 3-year field experiment was conducted in Jiayue Town, Zhucheng City, Shandong Province, China (119°06′E, 36°01′N) from 2016 to 2018. The local altitude is 130 m. The climate is temperate monsoon, with an average annual temperature of 12.3°C, average annual sunshine hours of 2,578.4 h, and average annual precipitation of 773 mm. The annual frost-free period is 232 days. The cropping system is continuous cultivation of flue-cured tobacco, and the local tillage method is rotary tillage. The soil type is classified as leached cinnamon soil according to the Chinese Soil Taxonomy, with 12.51% sand, 44.65% silt, and 42.90% clay. The properties of soil initially at different layers are given in Table 1.
Table 1
| Soil properties | Soil layer | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 20 cm | 20 - 40 cm | |
| Sand (>0.05 mm, %) | 12.51 ± 0.21 | 12.57 ± 0.25 |
| Slit (0.05–0.002 mm, %) | 44.65 ± 2.52 | 42.42 ± 2.20 |
| Clay (<0.002 mm, %) | 42.90 ± 1.28 | 45.11 ± 1.67 |
| Sand (>0.05 mm, %) | 12.51 ± 0.35 | 12.57 ± 0.41 |
| SOC (g kg−1) | 8.58 ± 0.14 | 7.95 ± 0.10 |
| AN (mg kg−1) | 91.00 ± 2.97 | 66.00 ± 2.03 |
| AP (mg kg−1) | 20.06 ± 0.77 | 10.62 ± 0.54 |
| AK (mg kg−1) | 213.59 ± 3.31 | 208.35 ± 3.09 |
| pH | 7.89 ± 0.11 | 8.03 ± 0.14 |
Basic soil properties in different soil layers (Oct 2016).
Values represent mean ± SE (standard error, n = 3).
SOC, soil organic carbon; AN, available nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; AK, available potassium.
2.2 Experimental design
Three kinds of granulated straw amounts (G1, 2,250; G2, 4,500; and G3, 6,750 kg hm−2) combined with two tillage modes (T, alternate-year deep tillage to a depth of 35 cm; and R, annual rotary tillage to a depth of 15 cm) were established. The conventional rotary tillage treatment without straw addition was set as the control (RG0). The experimental design diagram is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. Each treatment plot was 72 m2 (6 m × 12 m). All plots were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The granulated straw was prepared following the method of Wang et al. (2017a). The maize straw used for granulation contained 42.69% of carbon, 1.15% of nitrogen, 0.10% of phosphorus, and 0.98% of potassium. Additionally, chemical fertilizers and decomposition agents were added to the straw at a rate of 5.5 kg of NH4+–N, 2.0 kg of NO3−–N, 7.5 kg of P2O5, 6.0 kg of K2O, and 3.0 kg of decomposition agents per ton of straw. Since continuous deep tillage may damage soil structure, it was conducted every 2 years (specifically in 2016 and 2018). In the TG (deep tillage with granulated straw) treatment group, granulated straw was incorporated into the soil using a straw-burying plough with a 73.5 kW traction tractor (Model 1004) to a depth of approximately 35 cm. As the straw incorporation was carried out simultaneously with deep tillage, it was also applied biennially to align with the deep tillage schedule. In the RG (rotary tillage with granulated straw) treatment, straw was mixed with the topsoil (0–15 cm) using rotary tillage in 2016 and 2018. After that, ridging and strip fertilization were performed. The total amount of chemical fertilizer application was 76.95 kg hm−2 of N, 76.95 kg hm−2 of P2O5, and 193.50 kg hm−2 of K2O, which included the chemical fertilizer added during the preparation of granulated straw. The experimental flue-cured tobacco was NC55, which was transplanted in the first 10 days of May every year. The tobacco row and plant spacings were set at 120 and 50 cm, respectively, resulting in a total of 120 plants per plot.
2.3 Soil sampling and measurement
In 2016, 2017, and 2018, five soil samples were collected from each plot at depths of 0–20 and 20–40 cm. These five samples from each plot were combined to create a composite sample, which was then sieved through a 2-mm mesh to remove roots and plant debris (). For available nutrient determination, samples were collected on the 20th, 40th, 60th, 80th, and 100th days after tobacco transplanting. Samples were collected after tobacco harvest and immediately stored at 4°C for the analysis of SOC, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and available nutrients. For microbial analysis, soil samples were collected in September 2018 from the 20–40-cm depth and stored at −80°C for microbial DNA extraction.
2.3.1 Determination of SOC fractions
The SOC content was determined using the K2Cr2O7–FeSO4 oxidation method with heating in an oil bath (). Soil MBC content was measured using the chloroform–fumigation extraction technique (Vance et al., 1987). Meanwhile, DOC content was determined using the non-fumigated samples during the MBC extraction process (). Both DOC and MBC concentrations were analyzed using a TOC analyzer (multi N/C 3100, Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany).
2.3.2 Determination of soil available nutrients
AK was extracted using ammonium acetate and quantified by flame photometry. The NH+–N and NO3−–N were extracted with KCl solution (1 mol L−1), and the filtrates were analyzed using a continuous flow analyzer (AA3, SEAL Analytical, Norderstedt, Germany) according to .
2.3.3 DNA extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses
Bacterial DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of fresh soil using the Fast® DNA SPIN Kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with bacterial primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTAGGGAGGAGCA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTCHVGGGTWTTAT-3′). The PCR products were purified with the Agarose Gel DNA Purification Kit (TaKaRa, Shanghai, China). High-through paired-end sequencing of the DNA samples was performed at Majorbio Bio Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The raw sequences were analyzed using the QIIME software (v 1.9.0). After quality filtering, reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the closed-reference OTU picking against the Greengene database in QIIME (gg_13_5 version). Then, the community composition of each sample was assessed at each level. Mothur was used to analyze the α diversity of the bacterial communities (Chao1, Simpson, and Shannon indices).
2.4 Determination of flue-cured tobacco yield
The yield of flue-cured tobacco was determined by assessing the productive leaves from 50 plants located at the center of each plot. Tobacco leaves were harvested based on their maturity, and any unqualified leaves were discarded after inspection. The remaining leaves were then flue-cured and weighed, with the final measured mass representing the tobacco yield (; ).
2.5 Statistical analysis
SOC fractions and soil available nutrients were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA in SAS 9.4. One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences among seven treatments, with significance determined by Least Significant Difference (LSD) at p < 0.05. Two-way ANOVA was used to assess the interaction between tillage methods and straw particle amounts. Principal component analysis (PCA) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) were performed using the “vegan” package in R (v 4.4.0) to examine bacterial community differences based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Pearson’s correlation, calculated using the “heatmap” package in R, was used to explore the relationships between tobacco yield and soil properties in 2018. In addition, the relationships were further determined using a linear regression model with the Origin 2024 software. Box plots were also created using Origin 2024.
Microbial co-occurrence networks were constructed using CoNet to calculate multiple correlations between taxa and soil factors (Zheng et al., 2022). A valid co-occurrence was deemed statistically robust when the correlation coefficient exceeded 0.50 and the p-value was below 0.05. The p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to minimize false positives (). Networks were visualized in the Gephi software (), where nodes represent OTUs and soil factors and edges indicate pairwise correlations between nodes (Weiss et al., 2016).
Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed using SPSS-AMOS to analyze hypothetical pathways while explaining the interaction among SOC fractions, soil available nutrients, and soil bacterial traits under different granulated straw incorporation treatments. In general, a good fit of the SEM model meets most of the evaluation indices, including a lower chi-square/df ratio than 2 or 5 (), a higher p-value of the t-test than 0.05 (), a higher goodness-of-fit index (GFI) than 0.90 (), and a lower standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) than 0.08 (; ).
3 Results
3.1 SOC fractions
Granulated straw incorporation significantly increased SOC content (Figure 1A). In the 0–20-cm soil layer, increases were most pronounced under higher straw amount treatments (RG2 and RG3), with effects becoming more prominent over time. In the 20–40-cm soil layer, SOC content was the highest under the TG treatments and increased with increasing straw amount. Two-way ANOVA showed that both tillage methods (TM) and straw amounts (SA) had significant effects on SOC content (p < 0.01) in the 0–20-cm layer over all 3 years (Supplementary Table S1), while TM was the primary influencing factor in the 20–40-cm layer.
Figure 1
Compared with RG0, the RG3 treatment significantly increased DOC content in both the 0–20- and 20–40-cm soil layers in 2016 and 2017 (Figure 1B). In 2018, TG3 had the most significant increase in DOC content in both soil layers. Two-way ANOVA revealed that in the 0–20-cm soil layer, SA and the interaction of TM × SA significantly affected DOC content (p < 0.01) across all 3 years (Supplementary Table S2). In the 20–40-cm soil layer, DOC was significantly influenced by SA, TM, and their interaction (p < 0.05).
The DOC/SOC is an important indicator reflecting the impact of different soil managements on organic matter, which can predict the long-term change of soil organic matter (). RG3 had the highest DOC/SOC in 2016 and 2017, while TG2 and TG3 had the highest values in 2018 (Supplementary Figure S2).
Compared with RG0, the treatments of RG2 and RG3 significantly enhanced soil MBC content in both soil layers over the 3 years (Figure 1C). In addition, the two-way ANOVA showed that the TM, SA, and their interaction had significant effects on MBC content (p < 0.01) over the 3 years (Supplementary Table S3). The impact of each treatment on MBC/SOC is similar to that on MBC (Supplementary Figure S2).
3.2 Soil available nutrients
During the growth period of flue-cured tobacco, the soil NH4+–N content gradually decreased but slightly increased at the maturity stage in both soil layers (Figure 2A). In 2016 and 2018, the RG2 and RG3 treatments had the highest average increases of NH4+–N in both soil layers. In 2017, the TG treatments had a higher average increase in NH4+–N than the RG treatments in the 20–40-cm soil layer (Supplementary Figure S3).
Figure 2
Granulated straw incorporation also promoted an increase in soil NO3−–N content (Figure 2B). RG3 showed the highest average increase level in both soil layers in 2016 (Supplementary Figure S4). In 2017, compared with the RG treatments, the TG treatments promoted the average increase in NO3−–N content during the growth period of flue-cured tobacco. In 2018, during the vigorous growing period (June 19), RG3 had the highest NO3−–N content in the 0–20-cm soil layer, while TG3 had the highest NO3−–N content in the 20–40-cm soil layer.
AK content exhibited an initial descending trend, followed by a subsequent ascending trend, during the growth period of flue-cured tobacco (Figure 2C). In the 20–40-cm soil layer, the TG3 treatment had the highest average increases of AK across all 3 years (Supplementary Figure S5).
3.3 Diversity, composition, and structure of bacterial community
Bacterial community analyses were conducted on the 20–40-cm soil layer due to substantial changes in nutrient and carbon components at this depth. A total of 1,830–2,121 OTUs were identified (Table 2), with RG2 exhibiting the highest richness, followed by RG3, while TG1 was the lowest (p < 0.05). The Chao1 and Shannon indices showed a similar trend, whereas the Simpson index showed the opposite pattern, with TG1 being the highest and RG2 the lowest (p < 0.05).
Table 2
| Treatment | Richness index | Diversity index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTUs | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | |
| RG0 | 1,912 ± 23.38c | 2,501 ± 45.68c | 5.853 ± 0.013cd | 0.0121 ± 0.0002ab |
| TG1 | 1,830 ± 6.35d | 2,473 ± 23.91c | 5.731 ± 0.071d | 0.0148 ± 0.0019a |
| TG2 | 1,910 ± 11.79c | 2,617 ± 10.40b | 5.863 ± 0.074cd | 0.0118 ± 0.0025ab |
| TG3 | 1,955 ± 19.84c | 2,622 ± 19.05b | 5.919 ± 0.025bc | 0.0111 ± 0.0008abc |
| RG1 | 1,945 ± 6.56c | 2,615 ± 38.36b | 5.899 ± 0.044cd | 0.0135 ± 0.0006ab |
| RG2 | 2,121 ± 17.37a | 2,719 ± 35.38a | 6.267 ± 0.063a | 0.0072 ± 0.0014c |
| RG3 | 2,045 ± 22.70b | 2,736 ± 17.44a | 6.078 ± 0.063b | 0.0096 ± 0.0005bc |
The bacterial community diversity indices and the number of observed OTUs in different treatments.
Values represent mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference between treatments at p < 0.05.
RG0, rotary tillage with no straw return; TG1, deep tillage with granulated straw 2,250 kg hm−2; TG2, deep tillage with granulated straw 4,500 kg hm−2; TG3, deep tillage with granulated straw 6,750 kg hm−2; RG1, rotary tillage with granulated straw 2,250 kg hm−2; RG2, rotary tillage with granulated straw 4,500 kg hm−2; RG3, rotary tillage with granulated straw 6,750 kg hm−2; OTUs, operational taxonomic units.
The dominant bacterial phyla across treatments were Actinobacteriota (34.6%–40.8%), Proteobacteria (17.3%–20.6%), Chloroflexi (12.2%–14.2%), Acidobacteriota (5.7%–8.6%), Firmicutes (3.7%–7.2%), Gemmatimonadota (2.5%–3.8%), and Bacteroidota (2.8%–5.3%), accounting for 87.1%–91.7% of the total community (Figure 3A). Tillage methods had a stronger influence than straw amount on the relative abundances of Firmicutes, Spirochaetota, and Abditibacteriota (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Figures S6A, B). NB1-j had a significant difference among the TG treatments, while Spirochaetota had a significant difference among the RG treatments (Supplementary Figures S6C, D). The PCA explained 60.32% of the total variation, indicating distinct bacterial clustering by treatment (Figure 3B). The PERMANOVA confirmed that the community structures of bacteria were significantly affected by tillage and granulated straw (p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Network analysis revealed the associations between soil factors and bacterial phyla. Under the deep tillage management (Figure 3C), AK was the most influential factor, affecting bacterial OTUs with 28 positive and five negative edges among 69 nodes. It was followed by DOC with 15 positive edges and seven negative edges. Both AK and DOC were generally positively correlated with bacterial phyla. Under the rotary tillage management (Figure 3D), AK remained the dominant factor, with 26 positive and 20 negative edges among 90 nodes. MBC and NO3−–N were secondary factors, with 14 positive and seven negative edges for MBC and four positive and 18 negative edges for NO3−–N. Generally, AK and MBC had positive relationships with most bacterial phyla, while NO3−–N had a negative relationship with most bacterial phyla.
3.4 Tobacco yield
Compared with RG0, the RG treatments significantly improved tobacco yield, with RG2 exhibiting the highest increase of 65.1% (p < 0.05). Additionally, the high and medium straw amounts with deep tillage also resulted in significant yield improvements (Figure 4A). Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that the correlation between soil properties and yield varied significantly under different tillage methods (Figure 4B). Under deep tillage management, tobacco yield was most closely associated with SOC fractions. However, under rotary tillage management, yield was significantly correlated with NO3−–N, SOC, and bacterial Chao1 and Shannon indices. The linear regression analysis further confirmed that SOC and DOC were positively correlated with tobacco yield under deep tillage management (Supplementary Figure S7A). Moreover, significant positive correlations were also observed between yield and SOC, bacterial Chao1, and Shannon index (Supplementary Figure S7B).
Figure 4
3.5 The relationships among bacterial communities, soil available nutrients, and SOC fractions
SEM adequately fitted the data to assess the direct and indirect relationships among bacterial communities, soil available nutrients, and SOC fractions (Figure 5). Under the deep tillage management (Figure 5A), bacterial richness positively correlated with the SOC (Standardized Path Difference (SPC) = 1.040, p < 0.001) and DOC (SPC = 0.760, p < 0.001). Bacterial diversity directly affected MBC (SPC = −0.143, p < 0.001). In addition, NH4+–N directly affected DOC (SPC = 0.331, p < 0.01) and MBC (SPC = −0.539, p < 0.001). Under the rotary tillage management (Figure 5B), AK directly affected DOC (SPC = 0.269, p < 0.05), and NO3−–N was a main factor that affected MBC (SPC = 0.501, p < 0.001). NH4+–N negatively correlated with the SOC (SPC = −0.627, p < 0.05) and MBC (SPC = −0.371, p < 0.05).
Figure 5
4 Discussion
4.1 Effects of granulated straw incorporation with different tillage managements on SOC fractions
SOC is a key indicator of soil fertility and plays a crucial role in nutrient cycling (). Numerous studies have confirmed that high straw input significantly increases SOC content (; ). Similarly, our study demonstrated that incorporating granulated straw at medium and high amounts (4,500 and 6,750 kg hm−2, respectively) significantly enhanced SOC content. Beyond the straw amount, the tillage method was also a significant factor causing the difference in organic carbon. Many studies have shown that tillage will accelerate SOC mineralization, which is not conducive to improving the stability of the soil carbon pool (Zhang et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019). In flue-cured tobacco systems, soil is frequently disturbed by cultivation and ridging prior to transplanting, which can further exacerbate carbon loss. Therefore, granulated straw was used to supplement the soil carbon pool in our study. The application of granulated straw in our study compensated for this loss, resulting in a net increase in SOC content, with the effect of straw incorporation outweighing the negative impact of tillage.
Soil DOC is an active component of SOC and a sensitive index reflecting soil fertility (Straathof et al., 2014). Since DOC is mainly derived from plant residues, straw input is a direct contributor to increased DOC content (; ). Therefore, it is not surprising that straw return increased DOC content in our study. The proportion of DOC to SOC was generally high in 2018, especially in the TG2 and TG3 treatments, which was approximately 1.3%. This may be related to the reapplication of granulated straw in 2018. In particular, the TG treatment significantly increased the DOC content of the 20–40-cm soil layer, possibly due to enhanced aeration and permeability, which promote organic matter transformation and accumulation ().
MBC is a sensitive indicator of changes in SOC pools due to agricultural practices and an available nutrient pool in soil (; ). In our study, higher straw incorporation with rotary tillage significantly elevated soil MBC content across 3 years. On the one hand, high input organic substrate was an important factor that increased MBC content (Yuan et al., 2021); on the other hand, the high incorporation amount with rotary tillage reduced the uneven distribution of granulated straw in the soil layer. Several studies have found that tillage practice led to a decrease in soil MBC (; Yang et al., 2015). This is because tillage increases soil aeration, which then promotes carbon mineralization, and decreases soil moisture, which then inhibits microbial growth (Yang et al., 2015). In particular, deep tillage had a strong disturbance of the soil, which could lead to serious microbial carbon loss.
4.2 Effects of granulated straw incorporation with different tillage managements on soil available nutrients
Our study demonstrated that the amount of granulated straw incorporation plays a crucial role in regulating mineral nitrogen availability in tobacco-planting soil. Specifically, medium and high incorporation amounts led to significant increases in available nitrogen. These results are consistent with previous studies reporting positive relationships between straw input and soil nutrient enrichment (; ). Throughout the flue-cured tobacco growth period, soil NH4+–N content exhibited dynamic fluctuations, with an early peak accumulation occurring at the initial stage. This phenomenon may be attributed to humic acid formation during straw decomposition, which enhances the activation of fixed ammonium (Williams et al., 2018). Additionally, the relatively low nutrient demand of tobacco at early growth stages () may contribute to NH4+–N accumulation. In contrast, soil NO3−–N content declined in the middle growth period, likely due to leaching associated with rainfall. The subsequent peak in the later growth stage was most likely driven by enhanced nitrification, leading to an increase in NO3−–N content.
Potassium is a key determinant of tobacco leaf quality and is closely related to soil AK content. Our study found that AK content can be improved by different granulated straw incorporation methods. This improvement can be attributed to the relatively high potassium content (1%–2%) in maize straw and its efficient release due to the ionic nature of potassium in straw (). Moreover, humic acids formed during the decomposition of granulated straw can activate fixed potassium. This can also explain why AK content increases with the increase in granulated straw amount. The TG treatments promoted AK accumulation more effectively than the RG treatments, likely because deep tillage facilitates nutrient transport to subsoil layers, breaks the plow pan, and enhances root penetration and exudate-driven nutrient mobilization ().
4.3 Responses of bacterial traits to different granulated straw incorporation methods
The 20–40-cm soil layer was selected for microbial analysis due to its heightened sensitivity to carbon fractions and nutrient changes under different straw incorporation practices. Our sequencing results showed that bacterial richness was the highest under the RG1 and RG2 treatments. This suggests that higher carbon input and less disturbance to the 20–40-cm soil layer promoted the increase in bacterial richness (; ). Additionally, RG2 exhibited the highest Shannon index and the lowest Simpson index, indicating greater bacterial diversity and evenness under this treatment.
In our study, the granulated straw incorporation with different tillage methods for 3 years did not change the soil dominant bacterial phyla but had a significant impact on the less abundant phyla. Long-term tobacco cultivation may have contributed to a relatively stable microbial community structure, as plant root exudates play a crucial role in plant-to-plant signaling and strongly influence microbial community composition (). Our study observed increased relative abundances of Firmicutes and Gemmatimonadota under rotary tillage. Firmicutes is the main microbial community that degrades straw under anaerobic conditions, and reduced disturbance in the 20–40-cm layer under the RG treatments may favor their proliferation (). Gemmatimonadota has the ability to perform aerobic methane oxidation and supports carbon fixation by encoding enzymes to use trace gases as electron donors (). Methane gas generated under anaerobic conditions provides substrate for oxidation reaction participated by Gemmatimonadota, which may increase the relative abundance of Gemmatimonadota in the 20–40-cm soil layer. In the future study, we will further investigate the functional potential of these microbial communities through metagenomic analysis.
4.4 Effects of granulated straw incorporation with different tillage managements on tobacco yield
Straw incorporation is used to achieve higher economic output by improving crop yield (Song et al., 2024). Previous studies have demonstrated that a moderate rate of straw incorporation optimizes available nutrients and yields the highest crop production (). Therefore, it comes as no surprise that high and medium straw amounts significantly contributed to the increase in tobacco yield in our study. Indeed, organic amendments, such as straw, have been shown to enhance crop yield by improving soil microbial conditions (). Our study supports this finding, as evidenced by the positive correlation between tobacco yield and both the bacterial Chao1 and Shannon indices. The RG2 treatment had the most significant effect on tobacco yield, likely due to the increased diversity of bacterial phyla involved in straw decomposition and carbon fixation. Overall, granulated straw incorporation with rotary tillage is an effective strategy to enhance tobacco yield by enhancing SOC content, bacterial richness, and diversity.
4.5 Relationships between SOC fractions and soil available nutrients with bacterial traits
Our study identified AK as the primary factor influencing bacterial community under different tillage practices, generally showing a positive correlation with most bacterial phyla. reported that AK is a major driver of bacterial community variation, following only pH and available phosphorus (AP). Similarly, also highlighted AK as a major determinant of shifts in bacterial community structure. This is likely because certain bacteria participate in solubilizing and cycling soil potassium, thereby selecting for potassium-associated taxa (). The widespread use of potassium sulfate in tobacco fields may further amplify the impact of AK on bacterial communities. In addition to AK, DOC was another dominant factor under deep tillage, while NO3−–N played a crucial role under rotary tillage. Deep tillage facilitates the incorporation of granulated straw into the 20–40-cm soil layer, significantly increasing DOC content, which in turn enhances microbial abundance by providing a readily available carbon source (Straathof et al., 2014). In contrast, rotary tillage causes minimal soil disturbance at this depth, leading to NO3−–N accumulation due to leaching. Under anaerobic conditions, this accumulation promotes denitrification, ultimately resulting in a negative correlation between NO3−–N and most bacterial phyla.
The SEM further confirmed that bacterial traits significantly affect both the soil available nutrients and SOC fractions. Under deep tillage management, bacterial richness exhibited a strong positive correlation with SOC and DOC. It is well established that granulated straw incorporation enhances soil microbial populations, thereby facilitating the conversion of straw-derived carbon into stable soil organic carbon pools (Yang et al., 2021). Compared to deep tillage, bacterial traits under rotary tillage exhibited weaker effects on soil available nutrients and SOC fractions, likely due to the minimal disturbance of the 20–40-cm soil layer. A notable observation was the negative correlation between NH4+–N and both SOC and MBC. Since the SEM was built based on sampling at harvest time (September), at this time, the high soil temperature and moisture content at this stage likely enhanced microbial activity (Tan et al., 2018), accelerating nitrification. This process contributed to a decrease in NH4+–N. Conversely, NO3−–N showed a positive correlation with MBC, suggesting that enhanced nitrification increased NO3−–N levels. Furthermore, our study confirmed a significant positive correlation between AK and DOC under both tillage methods, likely due to the interaction between plant root exudates and soil nutrients. After tobacco topping, root systems release potassium into the soil, thereby increasing AK levels (). Simultaneously, high temperature and humidity conditions promote DOC production, ultimately driving a synergistic increase in soil AK and DOC. In our study, the SEM analysis was conducted using data collected in 2018, the third year of the experiment. While this provides valuable insights into the relationships among soil properties and microbial communities under relatively stable conditions, the lack of multi-year microbial data limits our ability to assess interannual variability. Future studies incorporating multi-year data would be beneficial for more fully capturing the dynamic nature of these interactions and providing a more comprehensive understanding of the long-term effects of different tillage measures.
5 Conclusions
Over the 3-year field experiment, the medium (4,500 kg hm−2) and high (6,750 kg hm−2) amounts of granulated straw incorporation improved the content of SOC fractions and available nutrients in both the 0–20- and 20–40-cm soil layers. Furthermore, the medium straw incorporation amounts with rotary tillage significantly increased the bacterial α diversity and the relative abundance of phyla Firmicutes and Gemmatimonadota in the 20–40-cm soil layer. Soil AK was the most important nutrient factor affecting different bacterial phyla. SEM revealed that SOC fractions under rotary tillage were primarily regulated by nutrient factors, while bacterial richness and AK played dominant roles under deep tillage. Medium granulated straw incorporation with rotary tillage is more worthy of improving the tobacco yield. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing tillage practices to enhance soil quality and crop yield in tobacco cultivation systems.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study are publicly available in the Figshare repository at the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29567522.
Author contributions
JD: Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing – original draft. PW: Data curation, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. PC: Writing – review & editing. WS: Investigation, Writing – original draft. XZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. NL: Investigation, Writing – original draft. YW: Investigation, Writing – original draft. XX: Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft. ZZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. YL: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. HP: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2021QD036), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32301969), Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (ASTIP-TRIC03), Weifang Tobacco Company of Shandong Province Technology Innovation Program (2024-38), and Henan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (232300420219).
Conflict of interest
Author YW was employed by the company Weifang Tobacco Co., Ltd. Author ZZ was employed by the company China National Tobacco Corporation.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1520760/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AlijaniK.BahraniM. J.KazemeiniS. A. (2012). Short-term responses of soil and wheat yield to tillage, corn residue management and nitrogen fertilization. Soil Till Res.124, 78–82. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.05.005
2
BaoS. D. (2020). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (3rd Ed.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press.
3
BardgettR. D.DeynG. B. D.OstleN. J. (2009). Plant–soil interactions and the carbon cycle. J. Ecol.97, 838–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01545.x
4
BastianM.HeymannS.JacomyM. (2009). “Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks,” in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3 (1), 361–362. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
5
BastidaF.MorenoJ. L.HernándezT.GarcíaC. (2006). Microbiological degradation index of soils in a semiarid climate. Soil Biol. Biochem.38, 3463–3473. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.001
6
BayS. K.DongX. Y.BradleyJ. A.LeungP. M.GrinterR.JirapanjawatT.et al. (2021). Trace gas oxidizers are widespread and active members of soil microbial communities. Nat. Microbiol.6, 246–256. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00811-w
7
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J.R. Stat. Soc: Ser. B (Methodological).57, 289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
8
ChenS.QiG. F.LuoT.ZhangH. C.JiangQ. K.WangR.et al. (2018). Continuous-cropping tobacco caused variance of chemical properties and structure of bacterial network in soils. Land Degrad Dev.29, 4106–4120. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3167
9
ChenZ. M.WangH. Y.LiuX. W.ZhaoX. L.LuD. J.ZhouJ. M.et al. (2017). Changes in soil microbial community and organic carbon fractions under short-term straw return in a rice–wheat cropping system. Soil Till Res.165, 121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.07.018
10
CongP.LiY. Y.GaoZ. J.WangJ.ZhangL.PangH. C. (2019a). High dosage of pelletized straw returning rapidly improving soil organic carbon content and wheat-maize yield. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Engineering.35, 148–156. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.01.018
11
CongP.LiY. Y.WangJ.GaoZ. J.PangH. C.ZhangL.et al. (2019b). Increasing straw incorporation rates improves subsoil fertility and crop yield in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.66, 1976–1990. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2019.1704735
12
CongP.WangJ.LiY. Y.LiuN.DongJ. X.PangH. C.et al. (2020). Changes in soil organic carbon and microbial community under varying straw incorporation strategies. Soil and Till Res.204, 104735. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104735
13
DaiX. Y.SuY. R.WeiW. X.WuJ. S.FanY. K. (2009). Effects of top excision on the potassium accumulation and expression of potassium channel genes in tobacco. J. Exp. Bot.60, 279–289. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern285
14
DongW.HuC.ChenS.ZhangY. (2009). Tillage and residue management effects on soil carbon and CO2 emission in a wheat-corn double-cropping system. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems.83, 27–37. doi: 10.1007/s10705-008-9195-x
15
DuvalM. E.GalantiniJ. A.MartínezJ. M.LimbozziF. (2018). Labile soil organic carbon for assessing soil quality: Influence of management practices and edaphic conditions. Catena171, 316–326. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.023
16
GhaniA.DexterM.PerrottK. W. (2003). Hot-water extractable carbon in soils: a sensitive measurement for determining impacts of fertilization, grazing and cultivation. Soil Biol. Biochem.35, 1231–1243. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00186-X
17
GilesC. D.BrownL. K.AduM. O.MezeliM. M.SandralG. A.SimpsonR. J.et al. (2017). Response-based selection of barley cultivars and legume species for complementarity: Root morphology and exudation in relation to nutrient source. Plant Sci.255, 12–28. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.11.002
18
GiuseppeB.SergioS.PaoloR.GaetanoA.DarioG.VitoA. L. (2015). Microbial biomass carbon dynamics in a long-term tillage and crop rotation experiment under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Asp. Appl. Biol.128, 213–219.
19
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods3, 424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
20
HuR.LiuY.ChenT.ZhengZ.PengG.ZouY.et al. (2021). Responses of soil aggregates, organic carbon, and crop yield to short-term intermittent deep tillage in southern China. J. Clean. Prod.298, 126767. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126767
21
HuW.WeiJ. Y.DiQ.TaoT.ZhangJ.LiuJ.et al. (2021). Flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) leaf quality can be improved by grafting with potassium-efficient rootstock. Field Crops Res.274, 108305. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108305
22
IannucciA.CanforaL.NigroF.DeV. P.BeleggiaR. (2021). Relationships between root morphology, root exudate compounds and rhizosphere microbial community in durum wheat. Appl. Soil Ecol.158, 103781. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103781
23
KavehN.EbrahimiA.AsadiE. (2023). Comparative analysis of random forest, exploratory regression, and structural equation modeling for screening key environmental variables in evaluating rangeland above-ground biomass. Ecol. Inform.77, 102251. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102251
24
KubarK. A.HuangL.LuJ. W.LiX. K.XueB.YinZ. (2019). Long-term tillage and straw returning effects on organic C fractions and chemical composition of SOC in rice-rape cropping system. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.65, 125–137. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2018.1490726
25
LatifmaneshH.DengA.LiL.ChenZ. J.ZhengY. T.BaoX. T.et al. (2020). How incorporation depth of corn straw affects straw decomposition rate and C&N release in the wheat-corn cropping system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.300, 107000. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107000
26
LehmannJ.BossioD. A.Kogel-KnabnerI.RilligM. C. (2020). The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nat. Rev. Earth ENV.1, 544–553. doi: 10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8
27
LiJ.SunW.LiuS.ChengT.TangL.JiangW.et al. (2025). Prediction and mapping of tobacco yield with fresh leaf mass using hyperspectral sensing data. Smart Agric. Technol.10, 100855. doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2025.100855
28
LiX. S.HanH. F.NingT. Y.ShenY.LalR. (2019). Variations of SOC and MBC observed in an incubated brown loam soil managed under different tillage systems for 12 years. Soil Use Manage.35, 585–594. doi: 10.1111/sum.12511
29
LiuN.LiY. Y.CongP.WangJ.GuoW.PangH. C.et al. (2021). Depth of straw incorporation significantly alters crop yield, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in the North China Plain. Soil Tillage Res.205, 104772. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104772
30
LiuX.PengC.ZhangW. J.LiS. Y.AnT. T.XuY. D.et al. (2022). Subsoiling tillage with straw incorporation improves soil microbial community characteristics in the whole cultivated layers: A one-year study. Soil Tillage Res.215, 105188. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105188
31
LiuJ. A.ShuA. P.SongW. F.ShiW. C.LiM. C.ZhangW. X.et al. (2021). Long-term organic fertilizer substitution increases rice yield by improving soil properties and regulating soil bacteria. Geoderma.404, 115287. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115287
32
LiuJ. J.YuZ. H.YaoQ.HuX. J.ZhangW.MiG.et al. (2017). Distinct soil bacterial communities in response to the cropping system in a Mollisol of northeast China. Appl. Soil Ecol.119, 407–416. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.07.013
33
LuR. K. (2000). The Analysis Method of Soil Agriculture Chemistry. (Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press), pp. 106–110.
34
MarshH. W.HocevarD. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol. Bull.97, 562–582. doi: 10.1037/00332909.97.3.562
35
MbuthiaL. W.Acosta-MartinezV.DeBruynJ.SchaefferS.TylerD.OdoiE.et al. (2015). Long term tillage, cover crop, and fertilization effects on microbial community structure, activity: Implications for soil quality. Soil Biol. Biochem.89, 24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.016
36
MiransariM. (2013). Soil microbes and the availability of soil nutrients. Acta Physiol. Plant35, 3075–3084. doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1338-2
37
MuhammadW.VaughanS.DalalR.MenziesN. (2011). Crop residues and fertilizer nitrogen influence residue decomposition and nitrous oxide emission from a Vertisol. Biol. Fertil Soils.47, 15–23. doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0497-1
38
PanX. M.ZhangS. R.ZhongQ. M.GongG. S.WangG. Y.GuoX.et al. (2020). Effects of soil chemical properties and fractions of Pb, Cd, and Zn on bacterial and fungal communities. Sci. Total Environ.715, 136904. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136904
39
QiaoJ. T.GuoR. B.YuanX. Z.ShiX. S.XuX. H.FanX. L.et al. (2013). Phylogenetic analysis of methanogenic corn stalk degrading microbial communities. Environ. Sci.34, 1531–1539. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2013.04.008
40
RenG.ZhangX.XinX.YangW.ZhuA.YangJ.et al. (2023). Soil organic carbon and nitrogen fractions as affected by straw and nitrogen management on the north China plain. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.342, 108248. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108248
41
RenC. J.ZhaoF. Z.KangD.YangG. H.HanX. H.TongX. G.et al. (2016). Linkages of C:N:P stoichiometry and bacterial community in soil following afforestation of former farmland. For. Ecol. Manage.376, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.004
42
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. (New York: Psychology Press). doi: 10.4324/9781410610904
43
ShenF.YangL.ZhangL.GuoM.HuangH.ZhouC. (2023). Quantifying the direct effects of long-term dynamic land use intensity on vegetation change and its interacted effects with economic development and climate change in Jiangsu, China. J. Environ. Manage.325, 116562. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116562
44
SongJ. S.ZhangH. Y.ChangF. D.YuR.WangJ.ChenA. P.et al. (2024). Subsurface organic amendment of a saline soil increases ecosystem multifunctionality and sunflower yield. Sci. Total Environ.917, 170276. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170276
45
StraathofA. L.ChincariniR.ComansR. N. J.HofflandE. (2014). Dynamics of soil dissolved organic carbon pools reveal both hydrophobic and hydrophilic compounds sustain microbial respiration. Soil Biol. Biochem.79, 109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.004
46
TanX. Z.ShaoD. G.GuW. Q. (2018). Effects of temperature and soil moisture on gross nitrification and denitrification rates of a Chinese lowland paddy field soil. Paddy Water Environ.16, 687–698. doi: 10.1007/s10333-018-0660-0
47
VanceE. D.BrookesP. C.JenkinsonD. S. (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass-C. Soil Biol. Biochem.19, 703–707. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
48
WangY.LiC. Y.TuC.HoytG. D.DeForestJ. L.HuS. J. (2017c). Long-term no-tillage and organic input management enhanced the diversity and stability of soil microbial community. Sci. Total Environ.609, 341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.053
49
WangS. C.LuC. A.HuaiS. C.YanZ. H.WangJ. Y.SunJ. Y.et al. (2021). Straw burial depth and manure application affect the straw-C and N sequestration: Evidence from 13C & 15N-tracing. Soil Tillage Res.208, 104884. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104884
50
WangC.NingP.LiJ. Y.WeiX. M.GeT. D.CuiY. X.et al. (2022). Responses of soil microbial community composition and enzyme activities to long-term organic amendments in a continuous tobacco cropping system. Appl. Soil Ecol.169, 104210. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104210
51
WangJ.ZhangL.PangH. C.ZhangJ. T. (2017a). Returning granulated straw for accelerating decomposition rate and improving soil fertility. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng.33, 177–183. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.06.023
52
WangR.ZhangH. C.SunL. G.QiG. F.ChenS.ZhaoX. Y. (2017b). Microbial community composition is related to soil biological and chemical properties and bacterial wilt outbreak. Sci. Rep.7, 343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00472-6
53
WangS. C.ZhaoY. W.WangJ. Z.ZhuP.CuiX.HanX. Z.et al. (2018). The efficiency of long-term straw return to sequester organic carbon in Northeast China’s cropland. J. Integr. Agric.17, 436–448. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61739-8
54
WeissS.Van TreurenW.LozuponeC.FaustK.FriedmanJ.DengY.et al. (2016). Correlation detection strategies in microbial data sets vary widely in sensitivity and precision. ISME J.10, 1669–1681. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.235
55
WilliamsA.WellsM. S.DickeyD. A.HuS. J.MaulJ.RaskinD. T.et al. (2018). Establishing the relationship of soil nitrogen immobilization to cereal rye residues in a mulched system. Plant Soil.426, 95–107. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3566-0
56
XuJ.HanH. F.NingT. Y.LiZ. J.LalR. (2019). Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system. Field Crops Res.233, 33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016
57
YangH. S.FangC.MengY.DaiY. J.LiuJ. (2021). Long-term ditch-buried straw return increases functionality of soil microbial communities. CATENA202, 105316. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105316
58
YangZ. C.LiH.BaiJ. S. (2015). “Effects on soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon of different tillage,” in Proceedings of the 2015 AASRI International Conference on Circuits and Systems. (Atlantis Press), pp. 21–24. doi: 10.2991/cas-15.2015.6
59
YuanG. Y.HuanW. W.SongH.LuD. J.ChenX. Q.WangH. Y.et al. (2021). Effects of straw incorporation and potassium fertilizer on crop yields, soil organic carbon, and active carbon in the rice–wheat system. Soil Tillage Res.209, 104958. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.104958
60
ZhangJ.HangX. N.LamineS. M.JiangY.AfrehD.QianH. Y.et al. (2017). Interactive effects of straw incorporation and tillage on crop yield and greenhouse gas emissions in double rice cropping system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.250, 37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.034
61
ZhangY.LiX. J.GregorichE. G.McLaughlinN. B.ZhangX. P.GuoY. F.et al. (2019). Evaluating storage and pool size of soil organic carbon in degraded soils: Tillage effects when crop residue is returned. Soil Till Res.192, 215–221. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.05.013
62
ZhangL.WangJ.PangH. C.ZhangJ. T.GuoJ. J.DongG. H.et al. (2018). Effects of pelletized straw on soil nutrient properties in relation to crop yield. Soil Use Manage.34, 479–489. doi: 10.1111/sum.12450
63
ZhangX. F.XinX. L.ZhuA. N.YangW. L.ZhangJ. B.DingS. J.et al. (2018). Linking macroaggregation to soil microbial community and organic carbon accumulation under different tillage and residue managements. Soil Till Res.178, 99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.12.020
64
ZhengJ.TaoL.Dini-AndreoteF.LuanL.KongP. J.XueJ. R.et al. (2022). Dynamic responses of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria populations to organic material amendments affect soil nitrification and nitrogen use efficiency. Front. Microbiol.13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.911799
Summary
Keywords
granulated straw incorporation, tillage method, soil organic carbon, soil available nutrients, bacterial community
Citation
Dong J, Wang P, Cong P, Song W, Zheng X, Liu N, Wang Y, Xiao X, Zhai Z, Li Y and Pang H (2025) Granulated straw incorporation with rotary tillage increases the content of soil organic carbon fractions and available nutrients and shifts bacterial communities in East China. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1520760. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1520760
Received
31 October 2024
Accepted
30 June 2025
Published
31 July 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Jie Zhou, Nanjing Agricultural University, China
Reviewed by
Guangqiang Long, Yunnan Agricultural University, China
Ruiping Li, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Dong, Wang, Cong, Song, Zheng, Liu, Wang, Xiao, Zhai, Li and Pang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Huancheng Pang, panghuancheng@caas.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.