ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Functional Plant Ecology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1539875
This article is part of the Research TopicFloral Adaptations and Pollinator Dynamics in a Rapidly Changing EnvironmentView all 12 articles
Nectar Traits of New Zealand Trees vary across Climatic Zones
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Waikato, Hamilton, Waikato, New Zealand
- 2School of Science, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Zurich, New Zealand
- 3Landcare Research New Zealand, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
To evaluate whether plant traits (nectar volume, concentration, sugar mass, flower fresh mass, and size) vary regionally in response to climate, we examined eight native New Zealand tree species. Flowers were sampled from seven sites across five climate zones spanning both main islands (37– 45°S / 170–177°E), yielding 4,276 flowers and 2,240 µL of nectar from 164 trees. Nectar volume ranged from 0.3–72 µL, concentration from 0.4–53 °Brix, sugar mass from 0.01–13 mg, flower fresh mass from 4–1116 mg, and flower size from 4–54 mm. Trait data were standardized (0–1 scale) and pooled into a global dataset for cross-species analysis. We used linear regression to assess correlations between plant traits across and within species, followed by parametric and non-parametric tests to examine regional variation. Generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) were applied to model trait responses to regional climate factors, identifying significant correlations within and across species. Across species, nectar concentrations were generally higher in drier regions (Canterbury and Hawke's Bay) located in the rain shadow of axial mountain ranges on New Zealand's east coast. Nectar volumes and flower masses were greatest in Dunedin, likely influenced by high relative humidity and low sunshine hours. In Nelson-Tasman and Marlborough, flowers were larger, but this trend was unexplained by climatic factors. Within species, plant traits exhibited regional variation, with highly species-specific trait relationships. GAMMs revealed significant climate-trait correlations in 87.5% of species, with climate variables explaining 18–84% of regional variation. Annual sunshine hours and rainfall had the strongest effects, and South Island nectar contained the highest sugar amounts in 67% of species. Although no uniform trend was evident across species, nectar volumes tended to be lower in sunnier regions, while flowers were larger and nectar concentrations higher in drier areas. Future studies should examine closely related species with larger sample sizes per region, ideally incorporating microclimate data from standardized measurement periods prior to sampling.
Keywords: Flower traits, regional variation, Pittosporum, Sophora, Fuchsia, Metrosideros, Leptospermum, Cordyline
Received: 05 Dec 2024; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 van Delden, Leuzinger, Richardson and Clearwater. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Johanna Maria van Delden, University of Waikato, Hamilton, 3240, Waikato, New Zealand
Sebastian Leuzinger, School of Science, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, 8092, Zurich, New Zealand
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.