ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1549305

This article is part of the Research TopicAbiotic and Biotic Stress Responses of Olive Trees Under Climate ChangeView all 7 articles

Transcriptome analysis of historic olives reveal stress-specific biomarkers

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Balqa, Jordan
  • 2The University of Jordan, Aljubeiha, Jordan
  • 3School of Agriculture, The University of Jordan, Aljubeiha, Amman, Jordan
  • 4National Agricultural Research Center, Baq'a, Jordan
  • 5Jerash University, Jerash, Jerash, Jordan
  • 6Al-Huson University College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Irbid, Jordan, Irbid, Jordan
  • 7Aqaba Customs Center, Aqaba, Jordan, Aqaba, Jordan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Water scarcity and soil salinization are increasingly becoming limiting factors for food production, including olives. Four historic olive cultivars (‘Nabali’, ‘Mehras’, ‘Frantoio’ and ‘Manzanillo’), were investigated under drought and salinity stresses. Investigating historical olives, which are the last resort for genetic resources, is essential due to their natural resilience, making them valuable for breeding sustainable production. They also preserve local biodiversity, and offer economic opportunities through unique, heritage-based olive oils. Drought and salt stress in olives are assessed through physiological (Fv/Fm, RWC), biochemical (proline content), and molecular (stress-responsive genes) analyses to evaluate stress tolerance. Under salinity and drought stress, RWC decreased in all olive cultivars, with drought having the most severe impact. Nabali exhibited the highest salinity tolerance, while all cultivars showed similar sensitivity to drought. Proline levels remained stable in Mehras but decreased under salinity stress in Frantoio, Manzanillo, and Nabali. Higher proline accumulation under drought suggested better drought tolerance than salinity in these cultivars. Photosynthetic efficiency declined under salinity and drought stress in all cultivars, with drought causing a more significant reduction. Manzanillo and Mehras exhibited the highest number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under both drought and salinity stress, with Manzanillo showing 2934 DEGs under drought and 664 under salinity, while Mehras had 2034 and 2866 DEGs, respectively. Nabali demonstrated the strongest salinity-specific response, with 3803 DEGs under salinity stress compared to 1346 under drought. Frantoio consistently had the lowest number of DEGs, with 345 under drought and 512 under salinity, indicating a more stable transcriptional response. Comparative analysis between drought and salinity conditions revealed significant variations, with Manzanillo showing 2599 unique DEGs under drought relative to salinity, while Nabali exhibited 2666 DEGs under salinity relative to drought. Major novel up-regulated genes under salinity stress were Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase hydrolase (7 fold in Nabali and 6.9 fold in Meharas). Drought novel genes detected in Frantoio included Phytosulfokines 3 (4.9 fold), while Allene oxide synthase (6.5 fold) and U-box domain-containing (6.4 fold) were detected in Manzanillo. The data revealed both novel unique and common stress specific biomarker, which potentially can be utilized in breeding programs of olive tree.

Keywords: Olive, Salinity, drought, DEG, biomarkers

Received: 20 Dec 2024; Accepted: 08 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Alkhatatbeh, Sadder, Haddad, Al-Amad, Brake, Alsakarneh and Alnajjar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Monther T. Sadder, The University of Jordan, Aljubeiha, Jordan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.