ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Cell Biology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1576928
This article is part of the Research TopicFrom the Cell to the WallView all 3 articles
The molecular architecture distinctions between compression, opposite and normal wood of Pinus radiata
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom
- 2New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited (Scion), Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
- 3Sainsbury Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
- 4Department of Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Lesser Poland, Poland
- 5Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Białystok, Białystok, Podlaskie, Poland
- 6Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
- 7Wisconsin Energy Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
- 8Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In gymnosperms compression wood is a specialised type of structural cell wall formed in response to biomechanical stresses. The differences in terms of gross structure, ultrastructure and chemistry are well-known. However, the differences between compression wood, normal wood, and opposite wood regarding the arrangements and interactions of the various polymers and water within their cell walls still needs to be established. The analysis of 13 Clabelled Pinus radiata by solid-state NMR spectroscopy and other complementary techniques revealed several new aspects of compression and opposite wood molecular architecture. Compared to normal wood, compression wood has a lower water content, its overall nanoporosity is reduced, and the water and matrix polymers have a lower molecular mobility. Galactan, which is a specific marker of compression wood, is broadly distributed within the cell wall, disordered, and not aligned with cellulose, and is found to be in close proximity to xylan. Dehydroabietic acid (a resin acid) is immobilised and close to the H-lignin only in compression wood. Although the overall molecular mobility of normal wood and opposite wood are similar, opposite wood has different arabinose conformations, a large increase in the amount of chain ends, contains significantly more galactan and has additional unassigned mobile components highlighting the different molecular arrangement of cell wall polymers in opposite and normal wood.
Keywords: solid state NMR (ssNMR), compression wood (CW), Secondary cell wall (SCW), Opposite wood (OW), Pinus radiata (Monterey pine)
Received: 14 Feb 2025; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cresswell, Dickson, Robertson, Gallagher, Risani, Le Guen, Temple, Liszka, Donaldson, Kirby, Ralph, Lyczakowski, Hill, Dupree, Dupree and Sorieul. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Paul Dupree, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 1GA, England, United Kingdom
Ray Dupree, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Mathias Sorieul, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited (Scion), Christchurch, 8011, Canterbury, New Zealand
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.