Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 19 September 2025

Sec. Plant Breeding

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1578931

This article is part of the Research TopicGenomic and Metabolomic Diversity in Fruit Plants: Impacts of Breeding TechniquesView all 3 articles

Research on genetic characteristics of corolla pattern traits in Sinningia speciosa

  • College of Agriculture and Horticulture, Chengdu Agricultural College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Background: Sinningia speciosa Benth., one of the earliest commercialized plants in the Gesneriaceae family, is renowned for its rich corolla patterns and vibrant colors. Studying the genetic characteristics of corolla pattern traits in Sinningia speciosa will significantly improve breeding efficiency, facilitate the development of more varieties with diverse floral patterns, and provide guidance for the transformation and innovative utilization of Chinese Gesneriaceae resources.

Methods: A comprehensive statistical classification was conducted on 259 accessions from different regions and 1,444 F1 hybrids derived from complete diallel crosses of 38 distinctive traits. Further selfing identification was performed on F2 progeny, and combining ability and heritability analyses were carried out based on trait classification to determine the genetic characteristics of these traits.

Results: The main popular traits of Sinningia speciosa include distinctive petal lobe patterns, unique corolla tubes, throat patterns, and semi-double flowers. Popular petal lobe patterns include Pockmarks, stripes, rainbows, white edges, mottling, and staining. Long-tubed corollas are predominantly labiate, while short-tubed corollas are mainly campanulate. In addition to striped throats, colored throats are also distinctive traits of Sinningia speciosa. Selfing progeny analysis revealed that petal patterns such as “Pockmarks” and “stripes,” as well as long corolla tubes, exhibit stable inheritance across successive generations. Complete diallel crosses of F1 and F2 progeny showed that all distinctive traits followed paternal inheritance, with paternal traits appearing more frequently than maternal traits in F1/F2 progeny. The highest probability of producing semi-double flowers was observed in single-petal × double-petal crosses. Among the distinctive traits, the general combining ability (GCA) effects were highest for rainbow rings, Pockmarks, and stripes, which are easier to stabilize and fix in early generations. Broad-sense heritability (H²B) and narrow-sense heritability (H²N) were highest for Pockmarks, rainbow rings, staining, and long tubes, suggesting that trait selection should be conducted in early hybrid generations during breeding.

Conclusion: The genetic characteristics of corolla traits in Sinningia speciosa are complex and diverse. Breeding plans should be tailored based on the genetic properties of these traits to shorten the breeding cycle.

1 Introduction

The genus Sinningia, belonging to the family Gesneriaceae, is a group of flowering plants named after Wilhelm Sinning (1794–1874), a 19th-century German botanist from Bonn (Boggan, 1991). This genus comprises 65 to 70 species, all of which are perennial herbaceous tuberous plants native to Central and South America, with a particular concentration in southern Brazil (Smith, 2019). The corolla pattern, as one of its remarkable features, includes complex phenotypes such as Pockmarks, stripes, veins, and color gradients. It not only has aesthetic value but also contains important information on plant developmental biology and ecological adaptation. Research has revealed that the formation of the Sinningia corolla pattern mainly occurs in the early stages of petal development and is closely related to the spatiotemporal regulation of cell differentiation and pigment synthesis. Multiple genes related to the formation of the corolla pattern have been identified, including genes regulating pigment synthesis (such as CHS, DFR, ANS in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway) and genes regulating cell differentiation (such as transcription factors MYB, bHLH, etc.) (Chen, 2020). Corolla patterns (such as Pockmarks, stripes, etc.) are commonly known as “floral guides” and play an important role in the interaction between plants and pollinators. The formation of the corolla pattern begins in the early stage of petal development. Epidermal cells differentiate into two types: ordinary epidermal cells and specialized pigment cells (such as anthocyanin - accumulating cells). This differentiation is regulated by cell - specific gene expression (Oliveira, 2018). The spot or stripe regions in the Sinningia corolla are closely related to the activity of the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) complex (Yamaguchi, 2021). The corolla patterns of Paulownia davidiana were classified into five categories, and several candidate genes related to pattern formation were identified by GWAS analysis, the SsMYB1 gene is highly expressed in the spot - forming sites and regulates local pigment deposition by activating anthocyanin synthesis genes (such as CHS, DFR, and ANS) (Zhang, 2021). In addition, transporter genes (such as GST) may be involved in the transport of pigments from the synthesis site to the vacuole, affecting the clarity of the pattern (Fenster, 2004).

Although the process of pattern formation can be inferred from cytological and pigment localization analyses, there has yet to be a systematic summary of how many typical traits currently exist in the corolla patterns of cultivated Sinningia species, what the genetic characteristics of these traits are, how stable their inheritance is, and which distinctive traits can be selected as breeding target selection, how to carry out targeted cultivar breeding based on the genetic characteristics of these traits as so on. Research on the phenotypic characteristics of Sinningia can provide valuable insights and guidance for breeding within the same family or genus with similar phenotypic traits. It holds significant importance for the development and utilization of Gesneriaceae plants in China and for the future industrialization of breeding efforts.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials and experimental methods

The experiment was conducted continuously for seven years, with all implantation conditions remaining unchanged throughout the period. The breeding materials for both the planted species and native species were provided by Chengdu Agricultural College and Sichuan Agricultural University. A total of 259 breeding materials were collected from 11 countries and regions worldwide, each exhibiting distinct typical characteristics. Based on petal traits, the test materials were categorized according to corolla characteristics, and three representative samples from each category were selected, resulting in a total of 114 typical materials. These materials were subjected to a complete diallel cross, repeated three times. The probability of trait expression in the offspring was investigated, and selected individuals from each category were continuously selfed for seven generations to observe their genetic characteristics.

2.2 Measurement methods

2.2.1 Petal and petal lobe trait descriptions

The front color of petal lobes was categorized into primary and secondary colors, along with descriptions of stripes, Pockmarks, and special edge colors on the lobes. Distinctive traits such as white edges, the size of rainbow rings, and the density and clarity of stripes and Pockmarks were recorded (Li and Wang, 2005).

2.2.2 Corolla tube traits

The lower fused tubular part of the corolla is referred to as the corolla tube. In this experiment, the observation focused on the length from the junction of the corolla lobes and the corolla tube to the base of the calyx. Corolla tubes ≥5 cm were classified as long tubes, while those<5 cm were considered short tubes. The corolla tubes of Sinningia speciosa are categorized into funnel-shaped, bell-shaped, and lip-shaped types. The flower posture is determined by the angle between the pedicel and the corolla tube, including side-facing (90°), downward-facing (−30° to 45°), and upward-facing (0°) types (Zhang, 2021).

2.2.3 Measurement of genetic traits in hybrid progeny

The semi-double flower series was classified based on literature, with the number of segregating progeny recorded. The length of the corolla tube was measured using a vernier caliper, from the base of the calyx to the horizontal length of the corolla limb. Other characteristic traits were described according to current popular descriptions of Sinningia speciosa (Hsu et al., 2017).

2.2.4 Combining ability analysis

Combining ability analysis was conducted using the complete diallel cross method introduced by Liu Laifu (1984) (Liu et al., 1984) General combining ability (GCA) was calculated as g_i = x_i - X_{.}gi​=xi​−X.​, and special combining ability (SCA) was calculated as S_{ij} = x_{ij} - X_{.} - g_i - g_jSij​=xij​−X.​−gi​−gj​. Here, x_ixi​ and x_jxj​ represent the mean trait values of the crosses involving the ii-th and jj-th parents, respectively, and X_{.}X.​ is the overall mean of all crosses. The Chi-square distance was calculated after normalizing the trait values and GCA of the 11 parental lines, and cluster analysis was performed using the sum of squared deviations. Data statistics and processing were completed using Excel 2003 and DPS 7.05 software.

2.2.5 Heritability analysis

Broad-sense heritability=(genetic variance/phenotypic variance)×100%;
Narrow-sense heritability=(additive genetic variance/phenotypic variance)×100%.

2.3 Data processing

The average values of the experimental results over six consecutive years were calculated. Data processing was performed using SPSS 17.0, and differences were compared using the least significant difference (LSD) method at a significance level of P = 0.05P=0.05.

3 Results and analysis

3.1 Construction of genetic populations for distinctive traits in Sinningia speciosa

3.1.1 Example analysis of corolla characteristics in trait-specific populations

The comprehensive trait characteristics of Sinningia speciosa with different corolla types were classified into 11 categories. Representative examples of distinctive traits are illustrated in Figure 1 (1-9), including semi-double flowers, unique petal lobe traits (white-edged, rainbow-edged, stained, spotted, striped, and mottled patterns), specialized corolla tubes, and distinctive throat patterns in both single-petal and double-petal progeny. ①Semi-double or Half double petal: The number of petal layers is between 1.5-2. (Figure 1-1) ②White-edged trait: Refers to petal lobes with variable-width white margins (Figure 1-2). ③Mottled trait: Characterized by irregularly distributed patches of contrasting colors on the petal lobes (Figure 1-3). ④ Rainbow-Rings trait: Features concentric color rings along the petal margins, with darker hues forming closed annular patterns (Figure 1-4). ⑤Pockmarks trait: Exhibits colored dots of varying sizes and densities, which may either dominate the petal lobe coloration or contrast with a base color (Figure 1-5). ⑥Striped trait: Displays one or multiple longitudinal stripes on the petal lobes (Figure 1-6). ⑦Smudge(Staining) trait: Shows gradient-like color permeation across petal lobes, resembling dye diffusion (Figure 1-7). In current horticultural trends, upward-facing flowers (0° orientation) dominate in Sinningia speciosa (Hsu et al., 2015). However, this study focuses on specialized corolla tubes in side-facing (90°) and downward-facing (−30° to 45°) orientations. These tubes are categorized into three types based on morphology: ⑧campanulate, labiate, and funnelform (Figure 1-8). Additionally, while typical corolla throats in Sinningia speciosa often exhibit Pockmarks (Busch et al., 2012), ⑨the “distinctive throat patterns” in this experiment include color variations and striped designs (Figure 1-9).

Figure 1
A collage of flowers showcases various gloxinia blooms in different colors and patterns. Rows are labeled 1 to 9, each featuring four or more flowers. The blooms range from speckled purples to vibrant pinks and pure whites, highlighting diversity in petal shapes and color gradients. The arrangement presents the distinct characteristics of each flower type.

Figure 1. Illustration of actual specimens showing the distinctive characteristics of the Saintpaulia corolla.

Figure 1 and Table 1 comprehensively summarize the key corolla traits, including: ①Width of white margins on corolla edges; ②Size and shape of mottled patches on petal lobes; ③Color intensity, margin width, and spatial distribution of rainbow-edged patterns; ④Pockmark color, size, and density on petal lobes; ⑤Stripe length and quantity; ⑥Uniformity of petal lobe coloration; ⑦Corolla tube morphology and petal lobe edge characteristics; ⑧Throat color and unique pattern combinations. These traits form the foundation for the vast phenotypic diversity observed in Sinningia speciosa.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Phenotypic distribution of F2 progeny traits.

3.1.2 Genetic expression analysis of corolla traits in distinctive populations

The characteristics of Sinningia speciosa with different corolla types are compared in Table 1. The distinctive traits are primarily manifested in four major categories: 1.Petal Lobe Traits: 522 cases (74.57%), the most prevalent, serving as a key criterion for distinguishing new cultivars;2.Throat Patterns: 107 cases (15.28%);3.Corolla Tube Traits: 61 cases (8.71%);4.Semi-Double Flowers: 11 cases (1.57%).As illustrated in Figure 1, the distribution of petal lobe traits is as follows: ①Pockmarks: 217 cases (41.57%), the most numers; ②Rainbow Rings: 128 cases (24.52%); ③Stripes: 98 cases (18.77%); ④White Edges: 44 cases (8.42%); ⑤Mottling: 35 cases (6.70%); ⑥Staining: 33 cases (6.32%). These traits highlight the predominant patterns in S. speciosa petal lobes. Among throat patterns, colored throats (excluding stripes, which account for 28.03%) are also a distinctive feature.

3.1.3 Genetic expression analysis of corolla traits in distinctive populations

The characteristics of Sinningia speciosa with different corolla types are compared in Table 1. The distinctive traits are primarily manifested in four major categories: Regarding corolla tubes, the ratio of long to short tubes is 80.32%:19.67%. Long tubes are predominantly labiate (23 cases, 54.09%), while short tubes are mainly campanulate (10 cases, 16.39%). funnelform and labiate tubes each account for 1.64%. Additionally, semi-double flowers (11 cases, 1.57%) are currently a popular floral type.

3.2 Genetic expression analysis of self-crossed and hybrid offspring of Anthurium

3.2.1 Genetic expression analysis of self-crossed and hybrid offspring of Anthurium

3.2.1.1 Analysis of variation curves of parameters of characteristic corolla type traits in self-bred progeny

The performance of petal lobe traits in different corolla types after seven generations of selfing is illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 presents the segregation dynamics of these traits during continuous selfing (generations F1–F7): These traits can be broadly categorized into three groups, Stable Traits: Pockmarks (PM) and stripes (ST) on petal lobes, along with long lateral corolla tubes (LLCT), showed minimal phenotypic changes across generations. Moderately Variable Traits: Rainbow rings (RR) and white edges (WE) exhibited noticeable changes in area and color intensity, though their core characteristics remained identifiable. Highly Variable Traits: Semi-double flowers (HDP) and mottling (MO) displayed significant alterations, including spot fading and reduced color saturation.

Figure 2
Multiple rows of flowers display various cultivars of Gloxinia,showing diverse colors and patterns. The top row features vibrant pink blossoms,followed by shades of purple and blue in subsequent rows. Some flowers have speckledpetals, while others are solid or gradient. The bottom rows include side views andadditional patterns, highlighting the variety within the species. It highlights the changes in the corolla patterns during continuous selfing.

Figure 2. Corolla characteristics on inbred progeny genetic expression. (a) HDP (b) RR (c) WE (d) PM (e) MO (f/k) S + ST (g/k) SM + ST (h) LLCT (i) SLCT (j) CT SLCT (j) CT.

Figure 3
Four line charts labeled ① HDP(SD), ② PL, ③ CT, and ④ CFT showtrends across factors F1 to F7. Chart ① displays two lines: “1PT HDP” increasing sharply and “1PT DP” gradually rising. Chart ② presents six lines with varying patterns: peaks and declines are evident, particularly with “2PL WE” and “2PL PM”.Chart ③ shows “3CT” and “3CT” with overlapping patterns. Chart ④ has “4CFT” and “4CFT” with similar but declining trends over time. Data indicates distinctive trends in each chart. It shows whether different corolla patterns have the characteristics of stable inheritance.

Figure 3. Analysis of the change curve of characteristic traits in the process of continuous self-crossing.

3.2.1.2 Genetic expression in F1-F2 hybrids

Complete diallel crosses of parents with distinct traits revealed following patterns (Figures 4A, B):

1. Paternal Inheritance Dominance: All traits appeared more frequently when the paternal parent carried the trait.

2. Semi-double flowers were most prevalent in single-petal × double-petal crosses (F1: 42.15–45.44%; F2: 30.13–31.56%).

3. Petal lobe traits like Pockmarks (F2: 72.31% paternal vs. 58.92% maternal), rainbow rings (63.28% vs. 60.23%), and stripes (56.13% vs. 44.26%) showed higher paternal transmission.

4. Corolla Tube Stability: Long lateral tubes (F2: 24.33% paternal, 16.55% maternal) were more stable than short tubes (F2: 18.65% paternal, 9.57% maternal).

5. Throat Patterns: Striped throats (F2: 19.23–20.23%) were inherited more reliably than colored throats (F2: 10.22–8.49%).

Figure 4
Bar charts comparing genetic expression of traits in hybrid F1 and F2 offspring. Chart A shows percentages for traits like petal lobe and corolla tube in F1 offspring with single and double petal types. Chart B displays similar traits in F2 offspring. Each bar represents mother petal type, with distinct colors indicating single or double petals and hybrid generations. Similarly, it indicates that this corolla pattern is recessive in hybridization and its genetic expression ability in offspring.

Figure 4. (A) Genetic expresion analysis of characteristic traits in hybrid F1 offspring. (B) Genetic expresion analysis of charteristic traits in hybrid F2 offspring .

Low-Frequency Traits: Mottling (18.13–10.56%), staining (22.23–18.89%), and colored throats exhibited reduced expression in F2 progeny.

3.2.2 Combining ability and heritability analysis of corolla traits in hybrid progeny

General Combining Ability (GCA) reflects the average performance of a parent in a set of hybrid combinations, serving as a critical indicator of breeding potential. Its magnitude and sign indicate the degree and direction of additive gene effects (Blinstrubien et al., 2020). As shown in Table 2A, Table 2B, paternal GCA values for all 11 traits across four categories are higher than maternal GCA values, a unique hybridization pattern distinguishing Sinningia speciosa from other ornamental plants. Paternal GCA: The highest values were observed for rainbow rings (51.3739), Pockmarks (75.5624), and stripes (46.6604), followed by staining (24.1184). White edges (-26.3553) and long lateral tubes (-33.4259) exhibited the most negative effects. Maternal GCA: The highest values were recorded for rainbow rings (28.623) and Pockmarks (38.852), with decreasing values for long lateral tubes (16.2138), staining (16.8715), and stripes (15.325). Notably, white edges (-46.539) and colored throats (-23.501) showed strong negative effects. Combined with Figure 2, these results suggest that long lateral tubes and Pockmarks are controlled by major genes and exhibit stable inheritance. In contrast, stripes and rainbow rings are influenced by both additive and non-additive gene effects, leading to phenotypic variability. Traits such as white edges, colored throats, and long lateral tubes display the highest negative additive effects, necessitating extended selection cycles to stabilize these traits in progeny.

Table 2A
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2A. Analysis of genotype variance and heritability for paternal traits in tested varieties/lines.

Table 2B
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2B. Analysis of genotype variance and heritability for female-parent combining ability of varieties (Lines).

It evaluates the extent to which a particular parent deviates from its average performance in hybrid progeny. SCA arises from non-additive genetic effects, is expressed only in hybrids, and is not stably inherited across generations (Moazzeni et al., 2020). The results in this study serve as a comprehensive reference for parental trait selection. The consistency of these findings is further supported by Figures 2, 3.

Heritability reflects the proportion of genetic variance to phenotypic variance, indicating the degree to which parental traits are transmitted to their offspring. It is a crucial quantitative parameter in genetics and breeding, representing the relative importance of genetic determination versus environmental influence in the inheritance of quantitative traits (Rind et al., 2023). Based on the performance of 21 traits in incomplete diallel crosses (Table 2A, Table 2B, the narrow-sense heritability (H²N) of paternal traits is higher than that of maternal traits. Traits with high broad-sense heritability (H²B), such as long lateral tubes, Pockmarks, rainbow rings, white edges, and stripes, rank highly in narrow-sense heritability (H²N), with Pockmark, rainbow rings, staining, and long lateral tubes being the top four. These traits are less influenced by environmental factors and exhibit strong additive genetic effects, making them suitable for early-generation selection. Traits like “rainbow rings,” “ Pockmarks,” and “stripes” show high H²B and H²N, with genetic variance (Vg) greater than environmental variance (Vs), indicating that additive effects dominate their inheritance. In contrast, other traits with low H²B and H²N, where Vg< Vs, suggest significant dominance and epistatic effects, necessitating extended selection cycles.

4 Discussion

The common corolla types of Sinningia speciosa are campanulate, with throats often displaying Pockmarks of varying sizes and vibrant flower colors (Chae et al., 2012). This study systematically analyzed 259 Sinningia speciosa accessions from different sources and 38 characteristic traits through complete diallel crossbreeding, revealing the genetic characteristics of corolla pattern traits. The results not only provide important theoretical foundations for Sinningia speciosa breeding but also uncover innovative genetic patterns, offering significant insights for optimizing breeding strategies. The diverse and distinctive corolla patterns observed highlight the genetic uniqueness and representativeness of the Sinningia genus (Dong et al., 2018).

This study found that the corolla pattern traits of Sinningia speciosa mainly include Pockmarks, stripes, rainbow rings, white edges, mottling, and staining. Among these, Pockmarks and stripes exhibited high stability in successive self-pollinated generations, consistent with the findings of (Zaitlin 2024; Li et al., 2013), suggesting that these traits may be controlled by a few major genes and are easier to fix in breeding. Additionally, the length of the corolla tube is closely related to corolla type: labiate corollas typically have long tubes, while campanulate corollas predominantly have short tubes. This association indicates a potential linkage between corolla tube length and the genetic regulation of corolla type, providing a new direction for further research into the genetic mechanisms of Sinningia speciosa. The study also revealed that all characteristic traits in the F1 and F2 generations exhibited paternal inheritance, meaning that paternal traits appeared more frequently in offspring than maternal traits. This finding contrasts with the results of Li et al. (2013) (Li et al., 2016), who suggested that Sinningia speciosa traits are primarily co-dominant or maternally inherited. The innovative discovery of paternal inheritance indicates that trait inheritance in Sinningia speciosa may be influenced by differences in parental gene expression or epigenetic regulation, offering a new perspective for future genetic research.

Combining the results of Figures 4A, B and Table 2A, Table 2B, it was concluded that the general combining ability (GCA) of paternal parents is higher than that of maternal parents, reflecting the paternal inheritance characteristic. This phenomenon may be attributed to cytoplasmic inheritance involving plastids and mitochondria (Schneider et al., 2015). When the paternal parent involves two or more pairs of relative traits, non-allelic genes on non-homologous chromosomes undergo free recombination. When these pollen grains combine with maternal gametes, they produce offspring with diverse genotypes and phenotypes, providing a genetic basis for floral diversity (Jong and Shmida, 2024). Some studies have also documented that, although rare, paternal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can integrate into fertilized eggs at very low frequencies, potentially influencing offspring (Ureshino et al., 2015). Additionally, epigenetic changes in paternal parents can also affect offspring (Herman et al., 2012). In summary, the genetic expression of characteristic traits is influenced by multiple factors, resulting in complex diversity (Zaitlin, 2012). The experimental results directly demonstrate the universality of paternal inheritance and the stability of certain traits in Sinningia speciosa.

In all F1 and F2 hybrid generations, the probability and number of specific traits appearing in offspring were higher when the same material was used as the paternal parent rather than the maternal parent (Figures 3(1-4)). Through successive generations of self-pollination, it was observed that traits such as “ Pockmarks,” “stripes,” and “long tubes” in petal lobes exhibited high stability, indicating their ability to be stably inherited with slow trait degradation. This suggests that these traits are likely controlled by major genes and may result from interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear DNA (Jong and Shmida, 2024).

Combining the heritability and combining ability analyses from Figures 4A, B and Table 2A, Table 2B, it was found that among the 11 characteristic traits of Sinningia speciosa, the more stable traits—” Pockmarks,” “stripes,” “rainbow rings,” and “long tubes”—exhibited high general combining ability (GCA) as parental traits. These traits appeared frequently in F1 and F2 generations with a higher number of offspring displaying the traits, indicating strong additive effects of alleles and non-alleles that can be stably inherited. This highlights the strong genetic characteristics of Sinningia speciosa corolla patterns, providing valuable references for future breeding selection. For traits with high GCA, early-generation selection can be implemented. The key to improving breeding efficiency and success lies in the flexible selection of parental trait combinations based on breeding objectives. The experiment aimed to verify the combining ability of specific trait categories in parents and did not fully reflect the specific combining ability (SCA) of individual traits. Therefore, a more detailed analysis is needed to elucidate the SCA of specific parental combinations. However, the results indirectly indicate that traits such as “ Pockmarks,” “stripes,” and “rainbow rings” also exhibit high SCA, with certain parental combinations making special contributions to offspring traits (Zaitlin, 2012).

In this study, petal lobe traits such as “Pockmarks,” “rainbow rings,” “staining,” and “long tubes” showed high broad-sense heritability (H²B) and narrow-sense heritability (H²N), indicating that these traits are primarily controlled by additive gene effects and are strongly influenced by genetic factors. These traits can be stably inherited, and desirable phenotypes can be obtained more quickly through selective breeding, making them valuable for early-generation selection. In contrast, traits such as “white edges” and “colored throats” exhibited high broad-sense heritability but low narrow-sense heritability, suggesting smaller additive genetic effects and larger dominant and epistatic effects. Therefore, it is advisable to increase the number of selection generations for these traits (Perret et al., 2003). Further research is needed to confirm whether epistatic gene interactions contribute to these traits and to elucidate their underlying mechanisms.

5 Conclusion

This study systematically revealed, the genetic patterns of corolla pattern traits in Sinningia speciosa for the first time, particularly the stability of traits such as Pockmarks and stripes, as well as the phenomenon of paternal inheritance. The discovery of the association between corolla tube length and corolla type provides a new direction for research into the genetic mechanisms of Sinningia speciosa. Through combining ability and heritability analysis, the genetic advantages of traits such as rainbow rings and Pockmarks were clarified, offering a scientific basis for early selection in breeding. The study also uncovered the genetic complexity of semi-double petal traits, laying the foundation for cultivating Sinningia speciosa varieties with diverse flower forms. In summary, the genetic characteristics of Sinningia speciosa corolla traits are complex and diverse. In practical breeding work, breeding plans should be formulated based on these genetic traits to shorten the breeding cycle and improve efficiency. The findings of this study provide important theoretical and practical guidance for the genetic improvement and varietal innovation of Sinningia speciosa.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.

Author contributions

YH: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Amrad, A., Moser, M., Mandel, T., de Vries, M., Schuurink, R. C., et al (2016). Gain and loss of floral scent production through changes in structural genes during pollinator-mediated speciation. Current Biology 26, 3303–3312., PMID: 27916524

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Blinstrubien, A., Burbulis, N., Jonytien, V., and Masien, R. (2020). Evaluation of factors affecting direct organogenesis in a somatic tissue culture of Sinningia speciosa (Lodd.) Hiern. Agronomy 10, 1783.

Google Scholar

Boggan, J. K. (1991). A morphological study and cladistic analysis of Sinningia and associated genera with particular reference to Lembocarpus, Lietzia, Paliavana, and Vanhouttea (Gesneriaceae: Gloxinieae). Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A. ix + 179 pages, 21 figures.

Google Scholar

Busch, A., Horn, S., Mühlhausen, A., Mummenhoff, K., and Zachgo, S. (2012). Corolla monosymmetry: evolution of a morphological novelty in the Brassicaceae family. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29, 1241–1254., PMID: 22135189

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Chae, S. C., Kim, H. H., and Park, S. U. (2012). Ethylene inhibitors enhance shoot organogenesis of gloxinia (Sinningia speciosa). The Scientific World Journal 2012, 859381., PMID: 23125558

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Chen, L. (2020). Developmental regulation of corolla patterning in Sinningia hybrids. Frontiers in Plant Science 29, 112–120.

Google Scholar

Dong, Y., Liu, J., Li, P. W., Li, C. Q., Lu, T. F., et al (2018). Evolution of Darwin’s peloric gloxinia (Sinningia speciosa) is caused by a null mutation in a pleiotropic TCP gene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 1901–1915., PMID: 29718509

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Fenster, C. B. (2004). Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35, 375–403.

Google Scholar

Herman, J. J., Sultan, S. E., Horgan-Kobelski, T., and Riggs, C. (2012). Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in an annual plant: grandparental and parental drought stress enhance performance of seedlings in dry soil. Integrative and Comparative Biology 52, 77–88., PMID: 22523124

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hsu, C. C., Chen, W. H., Yang, C. C., and Tsai, W. C. (2018). The molecular basis of flower coloration mechanism in Sinningia speciosa. Plant Science 274, 58–66.

Google Scholar

Hsu, H. C., Chen, C. Y., Lee, T. K., Weng, L. K., Yeh, D. M., et al (2015). Quantitative analysis of floral symmetry and tube dilation in an F12 cross of Sinningia speciosa. Scientia Horticulturae 188, 71–77.

Google Scholar

Hsu, H. C., Wang, C. N., Liang, C. H., Wang, C. C., and Kuo, Y. F. (2017). Association between petal form variation and CYCLOIDEA-like genotype in a hybrid line of Sinningia speciosa. Front. Plant Sci. 274, 58–66, PMID: 28458679

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Jong, T. L. and Shmida, A. (2024). Paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA may lead to dioecy in conifers. Acta Biotheoretica 2., PMID: 38869631

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Li, Q., Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., and Wang, J. (2020). Developmental genetics of floral symmetry in Sinningia speciosa. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 1234.

Google Scholar

Li, Z. Y. and Wang, Y. Z. (2005). Plants of Gesneriaceae in China. Zhengzhou: Henan Science and Technology Publishing House.

Google Scholar

Li, X., Bian, H., Song, D., Ma, S., Han, N., Wan, J., et al. (2013). Flowering time control in ornamental gloxinia (Sinningia speciosa) by manipulation of miR159 expression. Annals of Botany 111, 791–799., PMID: 23404992

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Liu, L. F., Mao, S. X., and Huang, Y. Z. (1984). Quantitative Genetics of Crops. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 206–284.

Google Scholar

Moazzeni, M., Reezi, S., and Ghasemi Ghehsareh, M. (2020). Growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Sinningia speciosa under red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes and sunlight. Advances in Horticultural Science 34, 419–430.

Google Scholar

Oliveira, P. (2018). Floral guides and pollinator attraction in Sinningia speciosa: The role of corolla patterns. Annals of Botany 13, 789342.

Google Scholar

Perret, M., Chautems, A., Spichiger, R., Kite, G., and Savolainen, V. (2003). Systematics and evolution of tribe Sinningieae (Gesneriaceae): evidence from phylogenetic analyses of six plastid DNA regions and nuclear ncpGS. American Journal of Botany 90, 445–460., PMID: 21659138

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Rind, R. A., Memon, S., Jatoi, W. A., and Rind, M. R. (2023). General combining ability and specific combining ability analysis for terminal heat tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Appl. Res. Plant Sci.

Google Scholar

Schneider, A., Stelljes, C., Adams, C., Kirchner, S., and Burkhard, G. (2015). Low frequency paternal transmission of plastid genes in Brassicaceae. Transgenic Research 24, 351–356., PMID: 25343875

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Smith, J. (2019). Genetic and biochemical basis of floral pigmentation in Sinningia speciosa. Plant Molecular Biology 192, 45–58.

Google Scholar

Ureshino, K., Nagahama, Y., Itabashi, T., and Miyajima, I. (2015). Maternal nuclear genome controls paternal plastid DNA inheritance in interspecific hybrids of Rhododendron. The Horticulture Journal 84, 12–18.

Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, T. (2021). Cellular basis of corolla pattern formation in Gesneriaceae: A case study in Sinningia. Developmental Biology 37, 231–245.

Google Scholar

Yang, X., Zhao, X. G., Li, C. Q., Liu, J., Qiu, Z. J., et al (2015). Distinct regulatory changes underlying differential expression of teosinte branched1-cycloidea-proliferating cell factor genes associated with petal variations in zygomorphic flowers of Petrocosmea spp. of the family Gesneriaceae. Plant Physiology 169, 2138–2151., PMID: 26351309

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Zhang, X. (2021). Classification and diversity of floral patterns in Sinningia speciosa. Horticulture Research 8, 1–12.

Google Scholar

Zaitlin, D. (2012). Intraspecific diversity in Sinningia speciosa (Gesneriaceae: Sinningieae), and possible origins of the cultivated florist’s gloxinia. AoB PLANTS 2012, pls039., PMID: 23755350

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: Sinningia speciosa, complete diallel crosses, corolla pattern, genetic characteristics, traits

Citation: Hao Y (2025) Research on genetic characteristics of corolla pattern traits in Sinningia speciosa. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1578931. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1578931

Received: 18 February 2025; Accepted: 13 June 2025;
Published: 19 September 2025.

Edited by:

Bruno Mezzetti, Marche Polytechnic University, Italy

Reviewed by:

Emmanuel Amponsah Adjei, CSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Ghana
Andari Risliawati, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia

Copyright © 2025 Hao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: YanLing Hao, NTEwMjMwNzk0QHFxLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.