ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1591506
Leveraging Cover Crop Functional Traits and Nitrogen Synchronization for Yield-Optimized Waxy Corn Production Systems
Provisionally accepted
- 1Jilin Agriculture University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
- 2Institute of Agricultural Resource and Environment, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Changchun, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Context: Prolonged monoculture of waxy corn (Zea mays L. var. ceratina Kulesh) exacerbates soil nutrient depletion and compromises soil structural integrity, concomitant with underutilization of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) resources. Objective: Implementing cover cropping post-harvest of waxy corn can utilize residual environmental resources for soil quality improvement. Nevertheless, the agronomic consequences of this practice on canopy architecture optimization and resource allocation dynamics in subsequent growing seasons require systematic elucidation. Methods: The regionally adapted cultivar Wannuo 2000 (W67×W68), predominantly cultivated in northeastern China, was employed for canopy characterization. Three experimental treatments were established, including waxy corn continuous monoculture control (CK), shamrock (Trifolium pratense L.) rotation cropping after waxy corn harvest (ZT) and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) rotation cropping after waxy corn harvest (ZB). Each treatment incorporated five nitrogen (N) application gradients (0, 60, 120, 180, 240 kg N ha⁻¹) arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with triplicate plots.Results: Cover crops integration significantly enhanced waxy corn productivity. Mean yields for ZT and ZB systems during 2022-2023 demonstrated 20.74% (8.88 ± 2.50 Mg ha -1 ) and 22.26% (8.99 ± 3.12 Mg ha -1 ) increases respectively compared to CK. Remarkably, under 25% N reduction scenarios, ZT and ZB achieved 15.25% (44.58 ± 6.28 %) and 20.67% (46.68 ± 7.15 %) improvements in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) relative to conventional practice. The path analysis revealed synergistic interactions between cover crop incorporation and N management mediated through canopy structural optimization. Specifically, enhanced leaf area index (4.56 ± 0.69 m² m⁻²) and elevated pre-silking canopy N content (132.61 ± 26.33 g N plant -1 ) collectively drove postsilking biomass accumulation (134.88 ± 26.85 g plant -1 ) and N remobilization efficiency.The integrated cover crop-nitrogen reduction system enhanced both yield and NUE relative to monoculture benchmarks, demonstrating dual benefits in environmental conservation and agricultural productivity enhancement.Implication: This study establishes a theoretical framework and provides empirical evidence for the sustainable intensification of waxy corn production systems.
Keywords: Waxy corn, cover crop, yield, nitrogen use efficiency, Path analysis
Received: 11 Mar 2025; Accepted: 14 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sun, Zhang, Zhou, Liu, Peng, Jia, Lv and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yanjie Lv, Institute of Agricultural Resource and Environment, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Changchun, China
Yongjun Wang, Institute of Agricultural Resource and Environment, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Changchun, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.