ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Functional Plant Ecology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1597590
This article is part of the Research TopicInteractive Effects of Climate Change and Human Activities on Plant Productivity in Grassland and Cropland EcosystemsView all 8 articles
Grassland management modulates ecosystem drivers: soil nutrient dominance in enclosure vs. pH-mediated regulation in grazing
Provisionally accepted- 1Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China
- 2Institute of Botany, Chinese Academic of Science, Beijing, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Grazing and enclosure are two major grassland management techniques, which are used to preserve plant variety, productivity, and ecosystem function. In order to compare plant diversity and ecosystem function under grazing and enclosure conditions, this study observed three typical grassland locations in southeast of Inner Mongolia via medium-scale line transect surveys. Our results showed that soil nutrients in enclosed grasslands control the diversity of plant species and aboveground biomass (AGB), which in turn regulates the amount of belowground biomass (BGB) by allocation.Enclosure consistently enhanced AGB and plant height compared to grazing, while increasing the relative contribution of perennial grasses and forbs to productivity through functional group reorganization. However, biodiversity responses were sitespecific, enclosure increased plant diversity at two sites but reduced it at another, revealing landscape-dependent results. The grazing reshaped ecosystem regulation through three key changes: (1) the relationship between soil nutrients and AGB was inverted, and demonstrated a negative correlation between diversity and AGB, (2) established the trade-off of the effects of BGB on AGB driven by soil properties (soil nutrients and pH), (3) microbial community restructuring from dual nutrient-pH regulation to pH-dominated control and (4) grazing strengthened plant biomassdiversity linkages, while enclosure prioritized soil nutrient-plant diversity correlations.Crucially, grazing reversed the functional role of soil pH, from positive microbial community regulation in the enclosure area to negative effects, through soil microenvironment alteration. These results provided a framework in which management practices reorganize ecological networks. Enclosure strengthened soil nutrient-mediated plant-soil feedbacks, while grazing promoted pH-driven microbial selection and change of biomass allocation strategy. Meanwhile, the spatial variability of enclosure effects highlighted the importance of local environmental backgrounds for consequences of grassland management.
Keywords: grazing and enclosure, Plant-soil system, soil pH, biomass allocation, plant biodiversity
Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 16 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mi, Wang, Ou, Shi, Pang, Feng and Bai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jia Mi, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, Shanxi Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.