EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci., 30 April 2025

Sec. Aquatic Photosynthetic Organisms

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1600036

This article is part of the Research TopicTrace Elements and Aquatic Plants: Accumulation, Ecological Impact, and Biomonitoring ApplicationsView all 5 articles

Editorial: Trace elements and aquatic plants: accumulation, ecological impact, and biomonitoring applications

  • Department of Ecology, Biogeochemistry and Environmental Protection, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland

Aquatic plants (macrohydrophytes) form a greatly variable group of plants, in terms of their life form, ecology and habitat preferences. The group includes permanently or periodically submerged, floating or emergent plants (mosses, ferns and angiosperms) and filamentous macroalgae (Pokorny and Kvet, 2003; Wetzel, 2001). They are the major components of most types of aquatic ecosystems playing a significant role in shaping the physical and chemical environment as well as establishing the structure and functioning of biocenosis. To mention only their most important functions, macrohydrophytes provide a considerable number of ecological niches and, as primary producers, constitute the basis of the food web. They also have the ability to absorb and accumulate numerous chemical substances from water and/or bottom sediments, including trace elements. Therefore, they contribute to regulating nutrient availability and controlling water eutrophication and purification, which can be utilized in phytoremediation. Importantly, aquatic plants are recognized as bioindicators and biomonitors because they respond to a variety of environmental conditions and pollutants (De et al., 2019; Chaurasia, 2022).

Macrohydrophytes are recognized bioaccumulators which can bioconcentrate trace elements in their tissues up to thousands of ppm and even 1000-fold the element concentration in the habitat (Yang and Ye, 2009; Tanwir et al., 2020). The uptake of trace elements is regulated by biological factors such as degree of plant development, morphology, genetic characteristics, as well as phenophase and non-biological factors such as exposure time, redox, Eh, pH, salinity, temperature, organic matter content, metal form and concentration in water and/or sediment (Lewis, 1995; Yang and Ye, 2009; Krems et al., 2013). Low concentrations of some trace elements (e.g., Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Ni) are vital and essential for normal plant metabolism and development (Maleva et al., 2012). As Szabó et al. reported in this Research Topic, Mn and Fe deficiency leads to reduced total chlorophyll content and limited growth of Lemna gibba. On the other hand, in case of too high concentrations of trace elements in habitat, the bioaccumulation in macrohydrophyte tissues may not equate with the physiological benefits of the element and reach toxic levels causing stress responses (Krems et al., 2013; Tanwir et al., 2020).

The negative effect of toxic trace elements is often associated with excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which induce oxidative stress (Maleva et al., 2012). The overproduction of ROS cause detrimental changes in the ultrastructure of plant cells and disruption of physiological and biochemical processes (Nayek et al., 2010; Saqira et al., 2024) such as cell respiration, photosynthesis, and nitrogen metabolism. Reactive oxygen species can damage enzymes, proteins, DNA, and lipids. They also cause degradation of photosynthetic pigments, the ultrastructure of the chloroplast and the assembly of plastoglobuli, changes in vacuoles (Tanwir et al., 2020), and impairment of the membrane selective permeability which results in cell plasmolysis (Basile et al., 2012). All these disruptions lead to decrease of cell division and retardation of plants growth. Common morphological and anatomical modifications due to trace element stress are therefore a reduced number of lateral roots and root hairs; changes in root diameter, epidermal cells, parenchymatous cells, central vein, and conductive tissue, as well as change in stem and leaf thickness; reduced number of leaves and leaf area (Yadav et al., 2021; Yang and Ye, 2009). In this Research Topic, Asaeda et al. reported a strong decrease in chlorophyll concentration in Elodea densa exposed to high concentrations of Fe, while Huang et al. observed a discoloration of the macroalgae Gracilaria bailiniae thalli and a decrease in photosynthetic efficiency due to exposure to high Cd concentrations. Importantly, in the study by Huang et al. numerous injuries to the ultrastructure of cortical cells were observed, such as vacuolization due to increase in the cell wall thickness, degeneration of chloroplasts, increased number of plastoglobuli, disrupted and swollen mitochondria, and reduced number of starch grains. Plants usually resist oxidative stress induced by trace elements by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes (e.g., peroxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase) (Nayek et al., 2010; Sridhar et al., 2020). Interestingly, in the current Topic Asaeda et al. showed that excess Fe in the environment causes a decrease in the level of some antioxidant enzymes such as catalase and ascorbate peroxidase in the tissues of E. densa, and consequently an increase in H2O2 accumulation. Since the level of these ROS in E. densa positively correlates with the Fe content in the environment, it may be an important indicator of the level of environmental stress.

Some species exhibit defense mechanisms to prevent intoxication and oxidative stress, such as the reduction of uptake (Tanwir et al., 2020) or the inactivation of toxic ions (Basile et al., 2012; Nayek et al., 2010). The toxic effects can also be modified by synergistic or antagonistic interactions with other abiotic and biotic stressors to which macrophytes are usually simultaneously exposed in their natural habitats (Polechońska and Samecka-Cymerman, 2018; Gaudard et al., 2018). In this context, Asaeda et al. noted that the combined effects of high Fe concentrations in water and high photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intensity was lethal to E. densa because Fe destroyed activity of antioxidant enzymes, which was not observed when the factors were applied separately. Also, Szabó et al. observed that the negative effects of nutritional metals (Fe, Mn) deficiency on the chlorophyll content of L. gibba were enhanced by a high pH of the water. On the other hand, Mazacotte et al. found out that elevated temperature reduced the sensitivity of submerged macrohydrophytes to the potentially harmful agricultural runoff enriched with trace elements, among others. Similarly, Huang et al. reported interactions between two trace metals (La and Cd) and showed that La mediates the production of flavonoids and lipids in the tissues of G. bailiniae, and thus plays a protective role against Cd. It limits its negative impact on, photosynthetic pigments content, photosynthetic efficiency and overall plant growth, among others.

The presented Research Topic contributes to the explanation of the interactions between aquatic plants and trace elements and thus supports their use in phytoremediation, biomonitoring of environmental pollution, wastewater treatment and many other eco-environmental technologies and applications.

Author contributions

LP: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AK: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the article authors who contributed to this Research Topic, Co-Editors of the Research Topic, Prof. Daniela Baldantoni, Dr. Alessandro Bellino and Dr. Carlos A. Harguinteguy, for their dedication to creation and evaluation of this Research Topic, and the Frontiers editorial staff for their guidance and production assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Basile, A., Sorbo, S., Conte, B., Castaldo Cobianchi, R., Trinchella, F., Capasso, C., et al. (2012). Toxicity, accumulation, and removal of heavy metals by three aquatic macrophytes. Int. J. Phytoremediation 14, 374–387. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2011.620653

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaurasia, S. (2022). Role of macrophytes: A review. Adv. Zool. Bot. 10, 75–81. doi: 10.13189/azb.2022.100401

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

De, M., Roy, C., Medda, S., Roy, S., Dey, S. R. (2019). Diverse role of Macrophytes in aquatic ecosystems: A brief review. Int. J. Exp. Res. Rev. 19, 40–48. doi: 10.52756/ijerr.2019.v19.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gaudard, A., Weber, C., Alexander, T. J., Hunziker, S., Schmid, M. (2018). Impacts of using lakes and rivers for extraction and disposal of heat. WIREs Water 5, e1295. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1295

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Krems, P., Rajfur, M., Wacławek, M., Kłos, A. (2013). The use of water plants in biomonitoring and phytoremediation of waters polluted with heavy metals. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S 20, 353–370. doi: 10.2478/eces-2013-0026

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis, M. A. (1995). Use of fresh water plants for phytotoxicity testing: a review. Envon. Pollution 87, 319–336. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(94)P4164-J

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Maleva, M. G., Nekrasova, G. F., Borisova, G. G., Chkina, N. V., Ushakova, O. S. (2012). Effect of heavy metals on photosynthetic apparatus and antioxidant status of elodea. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 59, 190–197. doi: 10.1134/S1021443712020069

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nayek, S., Gupta, S., Saha, R. (2010). Effects of metal stress on biochemical response of some aquatic macrophytes growing along an industrial waste discharge channel. J. Plant Interact. 5, 91–99. doi: 10.1080/17429140903282904

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pokorny, J., Kvet, J. (2003). “Aquatic plants and lake ecosystems,” in The lakes handbook: Limnology and Limnetic ecology. Eds. O’Sullivan, P. E., Reynolds, C. S. (Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing), 309–340.

Google Scholar

Polechońska, L., Samecka-Cymerman, A. (2018). Cobalt and nickel content in Hydrocharis morsus-ranae and their bioremoval from single- and binary solutions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 32044–32052. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3181-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Saqira, S., Chariton, A., Hose, G. C. (2024). Multiple stressors unpredictably affect primary producers and decomposition in a model freshwater ecosystem. Environ. Pollut. 347, 123680. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123680

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sridhar, A., Khader, P. A., Ramasamy, T. (2020). Assessment of cobalt accumulation effect on growth and antioxidant responses in aquatic macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle. Biologia 75, 2001–2008. doi: 10.2478/s11756-020-00497-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanwir, K., Javed, M. T., Shahid, M., Akram, M. S., Haider, M. Z., Chaudhary, H. J., et al. (2020). “Ecophysiology and stress responses of aquatic macrophytes under metal/metalloid toxicity,” in Plant Ecophysiology and Adaptation under Climate Change: Mechanisms and Perspectives. Ed. Hasanuzzaman, I. M. (Springer, Singapore), 485–511.

Google Scholar

Wetzel, R. G. (2011). “Limnology,” in Lake and River Ecosystems (Academic Press, San Diego, London).

Google Scholar

Yadav, V., Arif, N., Kováč, J., Singh, V. P., Tripathi, D. K., Chauhan, D. K., Vaculík, M. (2021). Structural modifications of plant organs and tissues by metals and metalloids in the environment: A review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 159, 100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.047

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J., Ye, Z. (2009). Metal accumulation and tolerance in wetland plants. Front. Biol. China 4, 282–288. doi: 10.1007/s11515-009-0024-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: abiotic stress, macrohydrophytes, macroalgae, toxic metals, synergistic and antagonistic effects

Citation: Polechońska L and Klink A (2025) Editorial: Trace elements and aquatic plants: accumulation, ecological impact, and biomonitoring applications. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1600036. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1600036

Received: 25 March 2025; Accepted: 01 April 2025;
Published: 30 April 2025.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Miroslav Obornik, Czech Academy of Sciences, Czechia

Copyright © 2025 Polechońska and Klink. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ludmiła Polechońska, bHVkbWlsYS5wb2xlY2hvbnNrYUB1d3IuZWR1LnBs

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.