ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Breeding
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1602171
Breeding indoor watercress for enhanced crop biofortification: harnessing natural variation of wild germplasm
Provisionally accepted- 1University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
- 2University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
We quantified natural genetic variation for a diverse wild watercress germplasm collection, from 32 accessions, collected from 16 locations in nine countries worldwide, grown in a controlled indoor environment with contrasting blue light regimes. Significant phenotypic diversity was identified for all three categories of traits: morphology and yield varied by 68 % across the population (leaf size, biomass production, stem length), sensory (sugar content and brix), and nutritional quality (glucosinolates, vitamin C, carotenoids) varied by 45% and 43% respectively.Using two LED light regimes, control and additional blue light exposure, revealed that the watercress nutritional profile is plastic, and that the magnitude and direction of plastic responses varied, depending on genotype and trait. Two glucosinolate compounds responded differently to blue light, I3M increased while PBGLS decreased, but other GLS compounds tested, 6MSO, 7MSO, 8MSO, and PEGLS showed varying responses to blue light depending on genotype. Carotenoids, especially lutein, increased consistently across the population under the additional blue light treatment, whilst vitamin C, glucose, and antioxidant capacity (FRAP) all decreased after the blue light treatment. Plants were smaller and had lower biomass, but developed more leaves and branches, under additional blue light. Using this phenotypic information, we identified donor germplasm lines and proposed a breeding scheme, for improved nutrition and flavor alongside enhanced yield, in indoor, controlled environments, where there is a paucity of data. Six elite genotypes were selected, that will produce a new progeny population of favorable characteristics in this powerhouse leafy-green crop.
Keywords: biofortification, Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA), Glucosinolates, Indoor cultivation, pre-breeding, Photomorphogenesis, phenotyping, Watercress (Nasturtium officinale)
Received: 28 Mar 2025; Accepted: 22 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 QIAN, Katz, Kliebenstein and TAYLOR. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: GAIL TAYLOR, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, England, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.