Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1603355

Divergent Effects of Successive Drought and Flooding on Photosynthesis in Wheat and Barley

Provisionally accepted
  • 1The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 2Jagannath University, Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Climate change is leading to increases in extreme weather events, notably increasing both droughts and floods, which undermine food security. Although each stress individually has been well studied, little is known about the response of cereals to successive water stresses, condition that often occurs in real-world scenarios. To address this gap, we have compared physiological responses of wheat and barley cultivars to cycles of drought and flooding. We show that these species show different responses to each other and that successive stresses result in different responses to single stresses.Plants were subjected to control, drought or flooding treatments for 15 days. Following that, previously stressed plants were exposed to a further stress -drought followed by flooding (D-F) or flooding followed by drought (F-D) for a further 15 days. These cereals showed contrasting responses both to drought or flooding alone and to successive stresses (D-F or F-D).Barley retained photosynthetic capacity when exposed to single-drought or flooding, whereas wheat responded to both stresses with significant declines in CO2 assimilation capacity by 41% and 31% in response to drought or flooding, respectively -primarily due to stomatal closure.However, the first exposure to water stress impacts the inhibition of photosynthesis during subsequent stress. The effect of subsequent water stress -drought or flood -was continued and aggravated by the previous stress in wheat. Importantly, non-stomatal factors were induced, which reduced Photosystem II efficiency (62% and 49%) and chlorophyll content (35% and 47%) in wheat under D-F and F-D stress. By contrast, barley retained its photosynthetic capacity under D-F stress by acclimating, with 41% reduced shoot growth, while F-D treatment induced abnormal stomatal development. Both treatments resulted in the accumulation of carbon in tissues.Overall, we conclude that sensitivity to a stress is increased by the exposure to a previous stress, with F-D stress having the largest effect, while barley is relatively more tolerant than wheat highlighting it as the more robust cereal crop under fluctuating water conditions.

Keywords: drought, flooding, Photosynthesis, wheat, barley

Received: 31 Mar 2025; Accepted: 04 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Saha and Johnson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Giles Nicholas Johnson, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.