ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Nutrition

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1603434

This article is part of the Research TopicHarnessing Plant–Microbe Interactions to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Plant-Soil Health for Sustainable AgricultureView all 10 articles

Long-term legume green manure residue incorporation is more beneficial to improving bacterial richness, soil quality and rice yield than mowing under double-rice cropping system in Dongting Lake Plain, China

Provisionally accepted
Jiangwen  NieJiangwen Nie1,2Qingyun  XieQingyun Xie1Yong  ZhouYong Zhou3Feng  HeFeng He1Muhammad  YousafMuhammad Yousaf1BO  ZHUBO ZHU1*Zhangyong  LiuZhangyong Liu1
  • 1Hubei Key Laboratory of Waterlogging Disaster and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, China
  • 2College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, China
  • 3College of Life Science and Technology, Hubei Engineering University, Xiaogan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Chinese milk vetch (vetch) is a promising winter cover crop that can reduce dependence on fertilizers and enhance crop productivity in southern China. However, its impact on soil microbial communities, soil quality, and rice yield, particularly when comparing the incorporation of green manure residue to mowing, remains insufficiently explored. To address this gap, an 12-year field experiment was conducted in the Dongting Lake Plain, comparing three vetch management strategies under double-rice cropping system: winter fallow (CK), vetch rotation with residue incorporation (CMI), and vetch rotation with residue mowing (CMR). The soil quality index (SQI) was calculated based on abiotic [e.g., soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N)] and biotic [e.g., bacterial abundance, abundance-based coverage (ACE), Chao 1] factors. Results indicated that both the vetch management strategies significantly improved rice yield. Compared to CK, CMI and CMR enhanced early, late, and annual rice yields by 6.22%-10.77%, 7.50%-13.49%, and 7.03%-12.40%, respectively. Additionally, CMI improved soil redox potential, alkali-hydrolyzale nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, and NO3--N, while CMR enhanced soil SOC, TN, NO3--N levels. Both CMI and CMR resulted in increases in the bacterial ACE index by 2.43%-2.53% and the Chao1 index by 0.92%-2.88% (P < 0.05). Furthermore, CMI reduced the Shannon index by 1.17% but increased the Simpson index by 19.35%, while CMR increased the Shannon index by 1.73% and elevated the Simpson index by 19.35% (P < 0.05). Principal component analysis indicated distinct bacterial community structures between CK and CMR. The dominant bacterial phyla included Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Nitrospirae, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria. Notably, CMR exhibited lower relative abundances of Proteobacteria, Nitrospirae, and Acidobacteria compared to CMI. Compared to CK, CMI increased SQI by 6.92%, while CMR showed more modest improvements in soil quality. Moreover, a strong positive correlation between rice yield and SQI further confirmed the beneficial effect of vetch rotation on soil fertility. These findings underscore the potential of vetch rotation, particularly through vetch incorporation, to enhance soil quality and rice productivity, thereby offering valuable insights for sustainable agricultural practices.

Keywords: Green manure, microbial community, soil fertility, legume, Crop yields

Received: 31 Mar 2025; Accepted: 02 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nie, Xie, Zhou, He, Yousaf, ZHU and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: BO ZHU, Hubei Key Laboratory of Waterlogging Disaster and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.