REVIEW article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Systematics and Evolution
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1606450
This article is part of the Research TopicPlant Diversification Driven by Genome and Chromosome Evolution and Its Reproductive and Environmental CorrelatesView all 9 articles
Bridging micro and macroevolution: Insights from chromosomal dynamics in plants
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Sevilla University, Seville, Spain
- 2Biodiversity Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Biology, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
- 3Botany Area, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Andalucia, Spain
- 4Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 5Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom
- 6Botany Area, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
- 7Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 8Department of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Understanding the relationship between macro-and microevolutionary processes and their delimitation remains a challenge. This review focuses on the role of chromosomal rearrangements in plant population differentiation and lineage diversification resulting in speciation, helping bridge the gap between macro-and microevolution through chromosomal evolution. We focus on angiosperms, a group that comprises the majority of extant plant species diversity, and exhibitsing the largest chromosomal and genomic variations. Here, we address the following questions: Are macroevolutionary patterns of chromosome evolution the result of accumulated microevolutionary changes, or do chromosomal dynamics drive larger shifts along the speciation continuum? At the macroevolutionary level, we investigated the association between karyotype diversity and diversification rates, using evidence from comparative genomics, chromosomal evolution modelling across phylogenies, and the association with several traits across different angiosperm lineages. At the microevolutionary level, we explore if different karyotypes are linked to morphological changes and population genetic differentiation in the same lineages. Polyploidy (autopolyploidy and allopolyploidy) and dysploidy are known drivers of speciation, with karyotypic differences often leading to reproductive barriers. We found that dysploidy, involving gains and losses of single chromosomes with no significant change in overall content of the genome, appears to be relatively more frequent and persistent across macroevolutionary histories than polyploidy. Additionally, chromosomal rearrangements that do not entail change in chromosome number, such as insertions, deletions, inversions, and duplications of chromosome fragments, as well as translocations between chromosomes, are increasingly recognized for their role in local adaptation and speciation. We argue that there is more evidence linking chromosomal rearrangements with genetic and morphological trait differentiation at microevolutionary scales than at macroevolutionary ones. Our findings highlight the importance of selection across evolutionary scales, where certain chromosomal dynamics become fixed over macroevolutionary time. Consequently, at microevolutionary scales, chromosome rearrangements are frequent and diverse, serving as key drivers of plant diversification and adaptation by providing a pool of variation from which beneficial chromosomal changes can be selected and fixed by evolutionary forces.
Keywords: Angiosperms, chromosome, Dysploidy, evolution, Polyploidy, speciation
Received: 05 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Benítez-Benítez, Mohan, Sánchez-Villegas, Gómez-Ramos, Valdés-Florido, Lucek, Slovak, Kolár, Leitch, Luceño, Larridon, Carta, Cuscó-Borràs, Maguilla, Montero-Ramírez, Meirmans, Scott, Martín-Bravo and Escudero. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Carmen Benítez-Benítez, Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Sevilla University, Seville, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.