ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Biophysics and Modeling

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1615019

Training systems affect spatial distribution of Korla fragrant pear (Pyrus sinkiangensis Yu) fruits by altering canopy structure and light distribution

Provisionally accepted
Pan  YanPan YanYonghui  DengYonghui DengShi-Jie  AnShi-Jie AnLing  MaLing MaTianle  LiTianle LiQi-Ling  ChenQi-Ling Chen*Qiangqing  ZhengQiangqing Zheng
  • Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences (XAARS), Shihezi, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Results: (1) Canopy Structure: Reduction and falling head effectively controlled canopy spread, significantly reduced the proportion of long branches while increased the proportion of middle branches. Thinning, however, increased the proportion of long branches, total branch length and average branch length, led to significant expansion in canopy diameter, surface area, and volume. (2) Light Distribution: Reduction increased average light interception (ALI) by 15%, while thinning improved ALI by 11% significantly, enhanced light availability across different canopy aspects, falling head notably improved light penetration in the middle and lower canopy layers. Persistent low-light zones (ALI < 300 μmol•m⁻²•s⁻¹) were identified in the lower canopy, inner canopy, and inter-tree spaces, highlighted key areas for light optimization.(3) Fruit Spatial Distribution: Smaller canopies had fewer but more uniformly distributed fruits. As canopy size increased, light interception and photosynthesis improved, total fruit yield improved, however, spatial heterogeneity intensified, with fruit-bearing zones shifted outward and upward, reduced carbon allocation uniformity. (4) Yield Correlations: Two canopy structural parameters showed significant negative correlations with consistently high yield traits, while ten exhibited positive correlations. Tree height, canopy surface area, and total branch length had the strongest positive associations with total yield. ( 5) Key Relationship: The correlation between light distribution and fruit spatial distribution strengthened significantly with canopy expansion. Conclusion: The influence of canopy structure and light distribution on fruit spatial distributions depends on canopy size. For small canopies, canopy structure serves as the dominant factor affecting fruit distribution, while in large canopies, light distribution becomes the primary driver. Accordingly, distinct canopy management strategies should be adopted, small canopies should focus on increasing canopy surface area and total branch length, to increase fruiting sites and enhance yield, large canopies require optimizing light distribution to improve fruit spatial uniformity. Thinning promoted flower bud formation significantly by increased the proportion of long branches and lateral branch number, thereby optimized consistently high yield traits.

Keywords: sinkiangensis Yu, canopy structure, light distribution, fruit spatial distribution, yield

Received: 22 Apr 2025; Accepted: 08 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yan, Deng, An, Ma, Li, Chen and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Qi-Ling Chen, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences (XAARS), Shihezi, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.