Abstract
Conocarpus erectus L. is one of the ornamental shrubs or trees that are utilized in different aspects in landscape (gardens, cities, roads, etc.). Fertilization program is an essential factor affecting the aesthetic characters of this plant species. Pots experiment was conducted in a randomized completed split plot design with the aim to study the effects of NPK fertilizers at the levels of 100%, 75%, and 50% of the suggested doses of 18, 12, and 6 g/plant from ammonium sulfate, calcium superphosphate, and potassium sulfate, respectively, as well as natural extracts as active dry yeast (ADY) at 1 or 3 g L-1, green tea (GT) at 0.2 or 0.5 g L-1, and seaweeds (SW) at 1 or 1.5 mL L-1, and their interaction on the growth and attributes of C. erectus in the 2022 and 2023 seasons. The results indicated that 100% NPK dose produced the highest significant values of plant height, number of branches, primary stem diameter, area/leaf, chlorophyll index, shoots and root fresh and dry weight, percentage of relative water content (in the second season), N, P, K, and total carbohydrates in comparison with 75% and 50% NPK doses in the both seasons. Moreover, 100% NPK increased the activity of peroxidase enzyme, phenol compounds, and antioxidant activity over the 75% and 50% NPK doses. Conversely, 75% NPK recorded a high relative water content (in the first season) and activity of catalase and polyphenol oxidase enzymes over the 100% and 50% NPK doses. All treatments of natural extracts had positive impacts on the studied parameters previously mentioned when compared to untreated control. Among the natural extracts used, 3 g L-1 ADY was the best application to increase the studied traits, except for leaf area and P%, whose higher significant values resulted from treatments with application of SW extract at 1.5 mL L-1 and 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW, respectively. Moreover, the 100% NPK dose combined with 3 gL-1 ADY was the best combination to execute the highest values of the aforementioned traits studied, except the primary stem diameter, P%, and PPO activity, whereas the highest values resulted from treatments with 100% NPK dose + 1.5 mL L-1 SW, 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW, and 75% NPK dose + 3 g L-1 ADY, respectively. Therefore, 100% NPK treatment combined with 3 g L-1ADY is recommended to fertilize C. erectus plants in order to reduce the overuse of chemical fertilizers and to minimize habitat contamination for the maintenance of the whole environment.
1 Introduction
Conocarpus erectus L. is an evergreen tree or shrub (Combretaceae); it is native to Florida’s mangrove forest ecosystem in North America. It tolerates temperature up to 47 °C and grows in low-fertility soil (). It can resist high salinity levels if it is adequately watered. According to , C. erectus provides food and cover for wildlife, helps fix dunes, and protects the soil during storm surges. It is commonly cultivated in various urban and landscaped settings such as gardens, parking areas, roadways, and public parks. Additionally, its potted forms are frequently utilized in the creation of bonsai (). Many factors affect the growth and chemical and biochemical processes in plant cells, consequently influencing the aesthetic value of ornamental plants. Significant changes to the morphological and physiological traits of plant parts (leaf, stem, and root) are identically attributed to plant growth, which is triggered with proper nutrition. Additionally, the soil physio-chemical characteristics can be altered directly or indirectly by fertilizer utilization (; ; ). Nutrition is an important factor among the factors that affect the growth and development of plants. Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) are the major elements applied in fertilizing due to their essential roles in the metabolism of the plant cell, enzyme activity, and several processes of chemical, biochemical, and physiological aspects (). However, excessive application of traditional NPK can negatively affect the soil quality, eutrophicate bodies of water, and contaminate air and ground water (). Moreover, the inefficient application of nutrients and habitat disruption pose significant challenges to sustainable agriculture and can result from the overuse of chemical fertilizers (; ). To reduce the excessive use of chemical fertilizers, natural extracts can be utilized as substitutes or alternates.
Seaweed (SW) extract is standing as a novel agro-class of agro inputs originating from the horticultural world. Farmers either add seaweeds in the soil or apply it as a compost (). More recently, SW has been recognized as a biostimulant, defined as any substance or microorganism applied to plants with the aim of enhancing nutrient uptake, improving tolerance to abiotic stress, or increasing crop quality traits, irrespective of its inherent nutrient content. SW can be administered either through soil application or as a foliar spray (). The biochemical and chemical composition of SW is complex (polysaccharides, fats, proteins, oils, vitamins, elements, acids, hormones, pigments, and antioxidants (; ; ). According to , seaweeds positively affect retention, remediation, and the microflora of soil, and they are considered a nutrient source; seaweeds have hormonal impacts as well. Seaweeds have also been proven useful owing to the actual content of molecule action in cell signaling, like polysaccharides (; ), polyphenols, peptides, and carotenoids (), betaines, macronutrients, and micronutrients. Additionally, SW extracts contain some vital phytohormones such as auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins, enhancing metabolism and development (), in addition to other hormone-like substances (; ). Therefore, seaweed application positively affects plant growth and development as shown in the studies of on ornamental plants, on Psidium juajava, on Citrullus lanatus, on Lantana camara and Abelia grandiflora, and on strawberry.
Active dry yeast (ADY) (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) is considered a bio-stimulant (; ). Yeast extract is a natural source of cytokinin and vitamin B (), protein, nucleic acids, most nutrient minerals, lipids, and carbohydrates. It also contains growth substances like pyridoxine, folic acid, vitamin B12, riboflavin, and thiamine (). Moreover, the yeast cell wall contains polysaccharide substances (mannan B-glucan) that cause a major contribution to the antioxidant characteristic of yeast extract via their ability to scavenge hydroxyl free radical and superoxide anions (). Especially the modification of B-glucan, by sulfation () or phosphorylation (), can exhibit change in its physiochemical traits and biological activities, therefore further enhancing its antioxidant capacity. Furthermore, mannan has an amazing antioxidant characteristic (). documented that the utilization of yeast extract individually or combined with chitosan can improve the antioxidant enzyme’s activity and proline content but decreases oxidative stress such as what happened in garlic plants due to water stress. In addition, revealed that using yeast can increase the antioxidant enzyme’s activities and decrease lipid peroxidation.
The application of organic fertilizers on plants is recognized as an agricultural approach to stimulate the plants’ nutritional efficacy. As a result, implicating the use of organic fertilizers in plants and using them as a foliar spray have been the focus in order to facilitate its uptake and transmission into various plant organs (; ). Green tea (Camellia sinensis) is one of these plants’ organic fertilizers, and the essential role of applying green tea extract lies in its high and readily absorbable nutrient and vitamin levels, aside from the polyphenolic substances which act as antioxidants, as well as its role in boosting the activity of enzymes, leading to oxidative stress reduction (). In addition, tannins, volatile oil, and caffeine are the vital compounds of green tea leaf extract (GTLE). In addition, GTLE contains catechin, epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, gallaocatechin, epigallaocatechin, and epigallaocatechin gallate, which are major active polyphenols (; ).
Some studies focused on promoting the impact of GTLE on the growth and chemical and biochemical constituents of plants such as Allium cepa (), Aralia plants (), Barhee date plants (), and Ricinus communis (). Further research is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms and to optimize the integration of yeast, seaweed, and green tea extracts with mineral nutrient applications. Currently, there is limited data available regarding the fertilization strategies for ornamental trees and shrubs. Therefore, this study focused on and suggested the response of C. erectus to various NPK doses, extracts of yeast, seaweeds, and green tea leaves and their interaction.
2 Materials and methods
At the experimental farm of the Faculty of Agriculture at Kafrelsheikh University in Egypt, pots experiment was conducted during the 2022 and 2023 seasons. The research aimed to study the response of vegetative growth, chemical and biochemical composition, enzymatic activities, and relative water content of Conocarpus erectus L. to NPK fertilizer doses, extracts (active dry yeast, seaweeds, and green tea), and their interaction. The farm’s location is in the coordinates 31°61′ N, 30°57′ E with an elevation of 6 m above sea level. The meteorological data recorded 203.28 and 111.68 mm of total rainfall, 53.68 and 57.73% average relative humidity, minimum average temperature of 15.0°C and 16.6°C, and average maximum temperature of 28.7°C and 29.6°C for the respective seasons according to the nearby Sakha meteorological station.
2.1 Plant material
Uniform Conocarpus erectus transplants, 3 months old and measuring 25 ± 2 cm in height with a stem diameter of 0.3 cm measured 3 cm above the soil surface, were obtained from the nursery of the Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, for use in this study.
2.2 Soil analysis
The physical and chemical properties of the growth medium were analyzed prior to planting (Table 1). Following air-drying, the clay and sand mixture (1:1; v/v) was thoroughly homogenized and ground using a mortar and pestle. The processed sample was then sieved through a stainless steel mesh to obtain fractions smaller than 2 mm (). According to , the hydrometer (US21CFR1040.10 AND 1040.11, USA) method was used to determine the distribution of the particle size.
Table 1
| Physical parameters | Chemical parameters | Available macronutrients (mg/kg) | Cations (meq/L) | Anions (meq/L) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay | 40.05 | pH (1:2.5) | OM% | EC (Mmo-hs/ds) | N | P | K | Ca++ | Mg++ | Na+ | K+ | Cl- | CO3– | HCO3- | SO4– |
| Sand | 37.03 | 7.84 | 1.33 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 2.27 | 163 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 6.93 | 0.17 | 1.73 | – | 8.5 | 3.27 |
| Silt | 22.92 | ||||||||||||||
| Soil texture | Clayey sand | ||||||||||||||
Physical and chemical parameters of the medium used.
+cation monovalent; ++cation bivalent; -anion monovalent; –anions bivalent.
To evaluate the chemical characteristics of the medium, a 1:5 ratio was used by mixing 20 g of air-dried medium with 100 mL of distilled water. The suspension was allowed to stand for 24 h before being filtered. Electrical conductivity (EC) was then measured using an EC meter (MI170, SZ, Egged, Hungary, Italy) (). Magnesium (Mg++), calcium (Ca++), and chloride (Cl-) concentrations—ENREF-40—were estimated by using the methods of . Standard methods were employed to determine the total carbonate content and organic matter (OM) of the medium (). The available nitrogen (N) amount was measured with the micro Kjeldahl (DNB.1500 NPS.N.33848 made in Spain RAYPA) method (). The available phosphorus (P) was estimated by using the procedure of . Sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) were estimated using a PSC7 flame photometer (JENEWY, Staffordshire, UK) (). The pH of the medium was estimated in the suspension (1:2.5, medium: distilled water) after 30 min by using a pH meter (JENEWY3510, Staffordshire, UK) ().
2.3 Planting date
Comparable C. erectus transplants were planted individually in plastic pots (one transplant per pot) measuring 40 cm in diameter and 32 cm in height. Each pot was filled with 9 kg of the prepared growth medium, and planting was carried out in April 1 during both of the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons.
2.4 Experimental design
The experiment was designed as a randomized complete split plot design (), where NPK fertilizers doses were arranged as main plots and natural extracts were arranged as subplots. The experiment contained five repetitions, with each repetition including 15 treatments (three NPK doses × five natural extract levels). Each treatment of each repetition included two plants. It means that each treatment contained 10 plants for the five repetitions. Thus, the experiment included 150 plants in each season.
2.5 Fertilizers used
2.5.1 Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers
The N, P, and K at rates of 18, 12, and 6 g/pot as ammonium sulfate (20.5% N), calcium super phosphate (15.5% P2O5), and potassium sulfate (48% K2O) were applied as the suggested full dose. Calcium super phosphate was utilized as one utilization during medium preparation before planting. The rates of N and K fertilizers were divided into 6 equal doses and were added monthly starting in May 1 until October 1 of each season.
2.5.2 Natural extracts
The natural extracts used were active dry yeast (ADY) at levels of 1 or 3 g L-1, seaweeds (SW) (Spirulina platensis, Ecklonia maxima) at levels of 1 or 1.5 mL L-1, and green tea (GT) (Camellia sinensis) at levels of 0.2 g L-1 or 0.5 g L-1. The ADY, SW, and GT extracts were sprayed three times with 1-month interval starting in May 2 during the experimental seasons. The plants were sprayed on the foliage until runoff in the morning. A wetting agent (Triton B) was added at 0.05 L-1 to all of the extracts used during spraying.
2.5.2.1 Preparation of natural extracts
Active dry yeast extract was prepared by using nutritional media that contained glucose and casein as a suitable source of C and N at 6:1 ratio and other essential nutrients like K, P, Fe, Mn, and Mg, and the temperature of the incubation was set to match with that of . The yeast cell was activated under suitable aerobic and nutritional conditions to stimulate yeast vegetative production and the formation of beneficial bio-constituents (amino acids, auxins, cytokinins, vitamins, carbohydrates, protein, fatty acids, and enzymes) as well as the elements. The composition of ADY is presented in Table 2.
Table 2
| Minerals (%) | Total protein (%) | Total carbohydrates (%) | Hormones (μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1.02 | Zn | 0.04 | 5.2 | 4.8 | IAA | GAs |
| P | 0.09 | Cu | 0.03 | 0.7 | 0.3 | ||
| K | 0.40 | Fe | 0.12 | ||||
| Ca | 0.03 | Mn | 0.05 | ||||
| Na | 0.008 | Mo | 0.0001 | ||||
| Mg | 0.01 | B | 0.013 | ||||
Composition of the active dry yeast extract used.
In the preparation of seaweed extract, 100 g of powder was soaked in 1 L of distilled water for 24 h using an orbital shaker to shake the extract at 25°C; then, the mixture was centrifuged (Sigma 3-18 KS, SIGMA Laborzentrifugen GMbH, Osterodeam Harz, Germany) at 5,000 rpm for 20 min to remove the debris. After that, Whatman no. 4 filter paper was used to filter the extract, and distilled water was added to complete the volume to 1 L (to obtain 10% w/v) of seaweed liquid extract. At 4°C, the extract was stored until use. The analysis of seaweed extract is presented in Table 3.
Table 3
| Macroelements (%) | Microelements (mg/L) | Hormones mg/L | Lactic acid (%) | Amino acids (%) | Matinol (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1 | Fe | 2,000 | Cytokinins | 10 | 5 | 2.2 | 10 |
| P | 5 | Mn | 1,000 | IAA | 200 | |||
| K | 10 | Zn | 3,000 | Gibberellins | 0.04 | |||
Constituents of the seaweed extract used.
In the preparation of green tea extract, 20 g of dried GT leaves was placed in a 500-mL flask. At 25°C, 200 mL of distilled water was added. The sample was shaken at medium speed for 2 h. After that, the sample was left for an hour to settle. Afterward, it was filtered by using Whatman no. 4 filter paper to separate the residue from the filtrate. Then, 2 or 5 mL of the filtrate was completed to 1 L with the addition of distilled water to obtain the concentration used (0.2 or 0.5 g L-1) ().
2.6 Treatments applied
Main plots: NPK doses at 100%, 75%, and 50%.
Subplots: Natural extracts: control (distilled water), 3 g L-1 ADY, 0.5 g L-1 GT, 1.5 mL L -1 SW, and 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW.
2.7 Data recorded
After 7 months (in November 1 of each season) from the planting of C. erectus transplants, the measurements discussed in the following subsections were recorded.
2.7.1 Vegetative traits
Plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, primary stem diameter (cm) at 5 cm above the soil surface, area/leaf (cm2) by a CI-202 laser area meter (CID Bio-Science, Cams, WA, USA), and chlorophyll index (SPAD units) were measured on the fifth leaf from the apical meristem using a portable leaf chlorophyll meter (SPAD-501; Minolta Crop., Osaka, Japan) () as well as the fresh and dry weight of shoots (leaves + steams) and roots (g/plant). The plants were separated into shoots and roots. These parts were individually rinsed with tap water to remove the soil and further purified with distilled water. To determine the plant parts’ dry weight, they were dried in an oven at 80°C for 24 h ().
2.7.2 Relative water content
The relative water content (RWC) percentage is as follows: five discs of C. erectus fresh leaves (1 cm diameter/disc) were weighed and then left to float on distilled water for 4 h to become fully turgid. The discs were weighed again (turgid weight). Afterward, the discs were dried at 70°C for 24 h and then weighed (dry weight) (). The RWC was calculated as follows:
2.7.3 Assay of enzymatic activity
The enzymatic activity was determined for the second season only. Catalase (CAT) activity was determined using the method described by , in which the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was monitored by the decline in absorbance at 240 nm. The reaction mixture consisted of 20 mg of total protein, 10 mM H2O2, and sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). CAT activity was expressed as the decrease in absorbance by 0.01 units at 240 nm per milligram of protein per minute.
Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity was estimated following the protocol of . The reaction mixture comprised 3.0 mL of 0.01 M buffered catechol and 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.0). Upon addition of 100 µL of crude enzyme extract, changes in absorbance at 495 nm were recorded every 30 s over a 3-min period. PPO activity was expressed as the increase in absorbance per minute per gram of fresh weight.
Peroxidase (POD) activity was assessed using the method of . The reaction mixture included 2.9 mL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), supplemented with 0.25% (v/v) guaiacol and 100 mM H2O2. Absorbance at 470 nm was measured at 30-s intervals for 3 min, and POD activity was expressed as the increase in absorbance per minute per gram of fresh weight.
2.7.4 Total phenol compounds and antioxidant activity
Air-dried leaf samples were ground and extracted in methanol. After a 24-h soaking period, the mixture was filtered, and the total phenolic compounds (TPCs) in the filtrate were quantified. The concentration of TPCs in the crude extract was determined using an external calibration curve based on gallic acid and the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent as described by . Specifically, 0.2 mL of each extract was mixed with the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. After 4 min, 1 mL of 15% sodium carbonate was added, and the mixture was left to stand at room temperature for 2 h. Absorbance was then measured at 760 nm using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; model 4001/4). The TPC content was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry weight (mg GAE/g DW). Each value represented the average of five independent measurements per fraction ().
The antioxidant activity (AOA) of the dry leaf extracts was assessed using a modified version of the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay, following the procedure of . A protein solution (0.1%) prepared in 5 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) was mixed with an equal volume (1:1 v/v) of 0.15 mM DPPH dissolved in 95% ethanol. The mixture was gently vortexed and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. The resulting absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer (Helios Gamma; Thermo Fisher Scientific). A blank was prepared in the same manner, except that PBS was used in place of the sample. Trolox was employed to generate the calibration curve, with concentrations ranging from 12.5 to 100 µM. Antioxidant activity was expressed as Trolox equivalents (TE) per milligram of dry leaves. Both TPC and AOA measurements were conducted exclusively during the 2023 season.
2.7.5 Leaf chemical composition
The digested leaves’ dry weight was prepared to estimate the percentages of N, P, K, and total carbohydrates. The leaf samples were dried for 24 h in the oven at 80°C. A homogeneous powder of leaves was prepared by grinding in a metal-free mill (Ika-Werke, M 20 Germany). Next, 0.2 g of the sample was mixed with 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid (95%), and the mixture was heated using a sand hotplate for 10 min. Then, 0.5 mL of perchloric acid was dropped carefully, and heating was continued to obtain a clear solution. The solution was filtered after cooling, and then it was diluted to 50 mL (). Micro Kjeldahl method was used to estimate N% (). A spectrophotometer (GT80+, UK) was used to quantify P% (). K% was measured by using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (). The techniques of were utilized to estimate the total carbohydrates%.
2.8 Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using SAS software (version 6.12; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Mean separation (± standard error) was conducted through a randomized complete split plot design, and significant differences among means were determined at p ≤0.05 using Duncan’s multiple-range test (DMRT).
3 Results
3.1 Vegetative growth traits
Vegetative traits in terms of plant height (PH), number of branches/plant (BN), primary stem diameter (PSD), leaf area (LA), chlorophyll index (CI), shoot fresh and dry weight (SFW, SDW), and root fresh and dry weight (RFW, RDW) were significantly affected by the application of different doses of NPK fertilizers, natural extracts, and their interaction in the two seasons (Tables 4–6).
Table 4
| NPK doses (g/plant) | Natural extracts | Plant height (cm) | Branches number / plant | Primary stem diameter (cm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st season | 2nd season | 1st season | 2nd season | 1st season | 2nd season | ||
| 100% NPK | 93.93 ±0.52 A | 95.15 ±0.66 A | 21.87 ±0.55 A | 22.90 ±0.17 A | 0.55 ±0.015 | 0.56 ±0.006 A | |
| 75 % NPK | 76.13 ±0.13 B | 77.20 ±0.46 B | 19.47 ±0.73 B | 20.40 ±0.35 B | 0.47 ±0.024 | 0.50 ±0.016 B | |
| 50 % NPK | 70.33 ±3.01 C | 75.10 ±0.17 C | 16.13 ±0.58 C | 16.90 ±0.17 C | 0.46±0.018 | 0.47 ±0.009 B | |
| Control | 65.78 ±0.48 D | 67.16 ±0.67 E | 13.56 ±0.99 D | 14.83 ±0.38 D | 0.38 ±0.008 C | 0.41±0.009 D | |
| 3g L-1 ADY | 96.61 ±0.58 A | 99.08 ±0.43 A | 23.00 ±0.69 A | 23.50 ±0.48 A | 0.53 ±0.020 A | 0.56±0.024AB | |
| 0.5g L-1 GT | 70.67 ±2.0 C | 72.83 ±0.29 D | 16.22 ±0.33 C | 17.50 ±0.38 C | 0.44 ±0.005 B | 0.45±0.005 C | |
| 1.5ml L-1 SW | 83.00 ±2.83 B | 87.83 ±0.10 B | 20.67 ±0.51 B | 21.83 ±0.87 B | 0.53 ±0.014 A | 0.55±0.013 B | |
| 1g L-1 ADY+0.2g L -1 GT+ 1ml L-1 SW | 84.61 ±0.71 B | 85.50 ±0.29 C | 22.33 ±0.33AB | 22.66 ±0.19AB | 0.57 ±0.014 A | 0.58±0.011 A | |
| 100% NPK | Control | 71.33 ±1.86 (e-h) | 72.50 ±1.44 g | 14.00 ±2.31 ef | 16.00 ±1.15 gh | 0.42 ±0.064 ef | 0.47 ±0.035 e |
| 3g L-1 ADY | 116.17 ±0.60 a | 116.75 ±0.14 a | 27.33 ±0.88 a | 28.00 ±0.57 a | 0.55 ±0.061abc | 0.60 ±0.035 bc | |
| 0.5g L-1 GT | 80.00 ±2.89 de | 82.50 ± 1.44 e | 17.00 ±2.08 de | 18.50 ±1.44 efg | 0.45±0.019 cde | 0.46 ±0.030 e | |
| 1.5ml L-1 SW | 99.67 ±2.73 b | 101.50 ±2.02 b | 25.00 ±1.00 a | 25.50 ±0.87 ab | 0.64 ±0.015 a | 0.65 ±0.003 a | |
| 1g L-1 ADY+0.2g L-1 GT+ 1ml L-1 SW | 102.50 ±1.44 b | 102.50 ±1.44 b | 26.00 ±0.57 a | 26.50 ±0.28 sb | 0.64 ±0.006 a | 0.64 ±0.006 ab | |
| 75 % NPK | Control | 64.33 ±2.33 gh | 66.50 ±0.87 ij | 14.33 ±1.20 ef | 15.50 ±0.29 hi | 0.39 ±0.022 ef | 0.41 ±0.003 f |
| 3g L-1 ADY | 92.00±0.58 bc | 92.50 ±0.29 c | 24.67 ±0.67 ab | 25.00 ±0.58 bc | 0.53 ±0.058 bcd | 0.57 ±0.032 c | |
| 0.5g L-1 GT | 65.33 ±0.88 gh | 66.00 ±0.58 hi | 17.00 ±1.15 de | 18.00 ±0.58fgh | 0.43 ±0.015 de | 0.44 ±0.012 ef | |
| 1.5ml L-1 SW | 76.00 ±1.15 def | 77.00 ±0.58 f | 20.33 ±2.96 cd | 22.50 ±2.02 cd | 0.43 ±0.056 de | 0.48 ±0.038 de | |
| 1g L-1 ADY+0.2g L-1 GT+ 1ml L-1 SW | 83.00 ±2.00 cd | 84.00 ±1.73 e | 21.00 ±1.00 bc | 21.00 ±0.57de | 0.56 ±a0.030 b | 0.58 ±0.020 c | |
| 50% NPK | Control | 61.67±0.88 h | 62.50 ±0.29 j | 12.33 ±0.90f | 13.00 ±0.58 i | 0.33 ±0.026 f | 0.35 ±0.012 g |
| 3g L-1 ADY | 81.67 ±1.76 cde | 88.00 ±0.73 d | 17.00 ±0.58 de | 17.50 ±0.28 gh | 0.52 ±0.007 bcd | 0.52 ±0.006 d | |
| 0.5g L-1 GT | 66.67 ±3.33 fgh | 70.00 ±0.00 gh | 14.67 ±1.45 ef | 16.00 ±0.57 gh | 0.45 ±0.017 de | 0.47 ±0.000 e | |
| 1.5ml L-1 SW | 73.33 ±12.02 (d-g) | 85.00 ± 2.89 de | 16.67 ±0.88 de | 17.50 ±0.28 gh | 0.52 ±0.000 bcd | 0.52 ±0.006 d | |
| 1g L-1 ADY+0.2g L-1 GT+ 1ml L-1 SW | 68.33 ±1.76 fgh | 70.00 ±0.57 gh | 20.00 ±0.58 cd | 20.50 ±0.29 def | 0.52±0.007 bcd | 0.52 ±0.006 d | |
Effect of NPK doses, natural extracts, and their interaction on plant height, number of branches/plant, and primary stem diameter of C. erectus in the 2022 and 2023 seasons.
Means that have the same letters within a column denote non-significance (P ≤ 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test (DMRT).
Table 5
| NPK doses (g/plant) | Natural extracts | Leaf area (cm2) | Shoots FW (g)/plant | Shoots DW (g)/plant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st season | 2nd season | 1st season | 2nd season | 1st season | 2nd season | ||
| 100% NPK | 60.32 ± 0.76 A | 62.51 ± 1.27 A | 831.01 ± 7.91 A | 837.85 ± 3.93 A | 207.73 ± 1.98 A | 209.45 ± 0.98 A | |
| 75% NPK | 55.89 ± 0.86 B | 57.86 ± 1.14 B | 798.10 ± 8.78 B | 803.60 ± 5.60 B | 195.51 ± 2.15 B | 196.86 ± 1.37 B | |
| 50% NPK | 43.84 ± 0.68 C | 46.43 ± 1.88 C | 673.14 ± 9.24 C | 681.02 ± 4.62 C | 161.52 ± 2.22 C | 163.44 ± 1.11 C | |
| Control | 47.52 ± 0.17 C | 48.92 ± 0.81 D | 695.07 ± 11.55 E | 701.64 ± 7.79 E | 170.63 ± 2.82 E | 172.22 ± 1.91 E | |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 58.27 ± 1.95 A | 59.61 ± 1.41 A | 846.81 ± 10.20 A | 855.46 ± 5.10 A | 207.58 ± 2.48 A | 209.73 ± 1.24 A | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 48.66 ± 3.30 BC | 52.55 ± 2.25 C | 716.77 ± 7.51 D | 723.18 ± 3.75 D | 194.47 ± 1.25 B | 202.19 ± 0.61 B | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 58.85 ± 0.58 A | 60.49 ± 1.10 A | 758.47 ± 8.85 C | 766.09 ± 4.43 C | 186.05 ± 2.18 C | 187.94 ± 1.09 C | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 53.72 ± 1.50 AB | 56.43 ± 1.57 B | 819.95 ± 5.10 B | 824.37 ± 2.50 B | 182.55 ± 1.84 D | 177.50 ± 0.92 D | |
| 100% NPK | Control | 54.72 ± 1.91 bc | 56.37 ± 0.96 e | 780.11 ± 8.66 e | 787.63 ± 4.33 h | 195.00 ± 2.17 e | 196.87 ± 1.08 f |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 70.74 ± 0.07 a | 70.80 ± 0.03 a | 885.17 ± 3.46 a | 888.00 ± 1.73 a | 221.25 ± 0.87 a | 222.00 ± 0.43 a | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 55.26 ± 5.95 bc | 60.42 ± 2.97 cd | 795.12 ± 9.81 d | 803.53 ± 4.91 fg | 198.75 ± 2.45 d | 219.62 ± 0.51 b | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 61.69 ± 2.45 ab | 63.81 ± 1.22 b | 820.00 ± 13.28 c | 831.50 ± 6.64 e | 205.00 ± 3.32 c | 207.87 ± 1.66 d | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 59.18 ± 2.29 b | 61.16 ± 1.14 bc | 874.66 ± 4.33 a | 878.60 ± 2.02 b | 218.67 ± 1.08 a | 200.87 ± 1.23 e | |
| 75% NPK | Control | 55.56 ± 2.68 bc | 57.88 ± 1.34 de | 740.10 ± 12.12 g | 740.25 ± 12.11 j | 181.30 ± 2.97 h | 181.30 ± 2.97 i |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 54.74 ± 0.76 bc | 56.27 ± 0.88 e | 855.15 ± 15.01 b | 868.18 ± 7.51 c | 209.48 ± 3.68 b | 212.66 ± 1.84 c | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 55.12 ± 1.78 bc | 56.67 ± 0.89 e | 755.06 ± 5.20 f | 759.50 ± 2.60 i | 208.25 ± 0.99 b | 209.11 ± 0.50 d | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 57.08 ± 0.50 bc | 57.51 ± 0.25 de | 790.19 ± 7.51 de | 796.55 ± 3.75 g | 193.55 ± 1.84 ef | 195.14 ± 0.92 fg | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 56.93 ± 4.66 bc | 60.97 ± 2.33 bc | 850.00 ± 4.04 b | 853.50 ± 2.02 d | 184.98 ± 1.27 g | 186.08 ± 0.64 h | |
| 50% NPK | Control | 32.27 ± 0.26 e | 32.50 ± 0.13 i | 565.00 ± 13.86 j | 577.17 ± 6.93 m | 135.60 ± 3.33 l | 138.48 ± 1.66 m |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 49.34 ± 4.12 cd | 51.77 ± 3.33 f | 800.12 ± 12.12 d | 810.20 ± 6.06 f | 192.00 ± 2.91 f | 194.52 ± 1.45 g | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 35.58 ± 5.75 e | 40.56 ± 2.87 h | 600.13 ± 7.51 i | 606.50 ± 3.75 l | 176.40 ± 1.66 i | 177.84 ± 0.83 j | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 56.97 ± 6.68 bc | 60.67 ± 1.84 cd | 665.23 ± 5.77 h | 670.23 ± 2.89 k | 159.60 ± 1.39 j | 160.80 ± 0.69 k | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 45.04 ± 2.46 d | 47.18 ± 1.23 g | 735.20 ± 6.93 g | 741.00 ± 3.46 j | 144.00 ± 1.80 k | 145.56 ± 0.90 l | |
Effect of NPK doses, natural extracts, and their interaction on leaf area (cm2) and shoots’ fresh and dry weight (g)/plant of C. erectus in the 2022 and 2023 seasons.
Means that have similar letters in a column are non-significant (P ≤ 0.05) according to DMRT.
Table 6
| NPK doses (g/plant) | Natural extracts | Chlorophyll index (SPAD units) | Roots FW (g)/plant | Roots DW (g)/plant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st season | 2nd season | 1st season | 2nd season | 1st season | 2nd season | ||
| 100% NPK | 55.87 ± 1.36 A | 57.78 ± 0.07 A | 265.00 ± 14.32 A | 277.40 ± 7.16 A | 71.26 ± 4.97 A | 75.50 ± 2.60 A | |
| 75% NPK | 51.28 ± 0.89 B | 51.45 ± 0.35 B | 235.06 ± 11.09 B | 244.90 ± 5.14 B | 59.40 ± 3.29 B | 62.00 ± 1.73 B | |
| 50% NPK | 49.69 ± 0.62 C | 51.25 ± 1.33 B | 191.66 ± 10.34 C | 200.70 ± 5.02 C | 49.13 ± 2.49 C | 51.20 ± 1.39 C | |
| Control | 44.40 ± 1.25 E | 45.18 ± 2.01 D | 189.77 ± 9.43 E | 198.00 ± 4.62 E | 46.55 ± 3.76 E | 49.67 ± 2.12 D | |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 58.93 ± 1.96 A | 61.83 ± 0.60 A | 266.44 ± 12.51 A | 277.33 ± 6.16 A | 76.33 ± 3.73 A | 79.33 ± 1.54 A | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 47.63 ± 1.56 D | 59.00 ± 0.27 B | 205.22 ± 12.82 D | 216.67 ± 5.77 D | 53.55 ± 3.49 D | 56.34 ± 2.11 C | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 52.11 ± 1.37 C | 54.33 ± 0.26 C | 241.33 ± 14.15 C | 253.67 ± 6.93 C | 59.44 ± 3.65 C | 62.33 ± 1.73 B | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 55.28 ± 1.84 B | 56.28 ± 1.09 C | 250.11 ± 10.68 B | 259.33 ± 5.39 B | 63.77 ± 3.66 B | 66.83 ± 2.02 B | |
| 100% NPK | Control | 47.66 ± 0.49 a | 47.10 ± 0.23i | 230.00 ± 12.70 f | 241.00 ± 6.35 h | 55.66 ± 7.51 fg | 62.00 ± 4.04 ef |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 66.73 ± 3.70 a | 69.65 ± 2.28 a | 290.00 ± 13.86 a | 302.00 ± 6.93 a | 95.00 ± 4.04 a | 98.50 ± 2.02 a | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 51.06 ± 1.19 a | 52.85 ± 0.89 g | 250.00 ± 14.43 d | 262.50 ± 7.22 e | 60.66 ± 3.48 de | 63.50 ± 2.02 e | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 58.43 ± 2.39 a | 60.75 ± 0.61 c | 275.00 ± 15.01 bc | 288.00 ± 7.51 c | 65.00 ± 4.62 d | 69.00 ± 2.31 d | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 55.46 ± 3.37 a | 58.55 ± 1.36 d | 280.00 ± 15.59 b | 293.50 ± 7.79 b | 80.00 ± 5.20 b | 84.50 ± 2.60 b | |
| 75% NPK | Control | 42.90 ± 2.27 a | 44.50 ± 1.62 j | 200.00 ± 7.51 i | 206.50 ± 3.75 k | 50.66 ± 2.33 h | 52.50 ± 1.44 h |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 54.56 ± 4.53 a | 58.90 ± 1.33 d | 270.00 ± 10.39 c | 279.00 ± 5.20 d | 74.66 ± 4.33 c | 78.50 ± 2.02 c | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 47.33 ± 3.10 a | 49.15 ± 2.51 h | 211.00 ± 15.14 h | 225.00 ± 7.55 i | 56.33 ± 2.96 efg | 58.50 ± 2.01 g | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 46.60 ± 2.90 a | 49.40 ± 0.75 h | 244.33 ± 13.85 de | 256.50 ± 6.64 f | 60.00 ± 3.79 e | 62.50 ± 1.44 e | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 55.93 ± 1.40 a | 55.30 ± 0.29 f | 250.00 ± 8.66 d | 257.50 ± 4.33 f | 55.33 ± 3.18 fg | 58.00 ± 1.73 g | |
| 50% NPK | Control | 42.63 ± 6.01 a | 43.95 ± 4.19 g | 139.33 ± 8.09 k | 146.50 ± 3.74 m | 33.33 ± 1.45 j | 34.50 ± 0.87 c |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 55.50 ± 1.67 a | 56.95 ± 0.84 e | 239.33 ± 13.28 e | 251.00 ± 6.35 g | 59.33 ± 1.76 ef | 61.00 ± 0.58 f | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 44.50 ± 0.67 a | 48.25 ± 0.14 hi | 154.66 ± 8.95 j | 162.50 ± 4.33 l | 43.66 ± 4.06 i | 47.00 ± 2.31 i | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 51.30 ± 1.68 a | 52.85 ± 0.66 g | 204.66 ± 13.57 hi | 216.50 ± 6.64 j | 53.33 ± 2.60 fg | 52.50 ± 1.43 h | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 54.50 ± 1.08 a | 54.25 ± 0.83 hi | 220.33 ± 7.80 g | 227.00 ± 4.04 i | 56.00 ± 2.65 fg | 58.00 ± 1.73 g | |
Effect of NPK doses, natural extracts, and their interaction on chlorophyll index (SPAD units) and roots’ fresh and dry weight (g)/plant of C. erectus in the 2022 and 2023 seasons.
Means that have the same letters in a column are non-significant (P ≤0.05) according to DMRT.
The 100% NPK dose significantly achieved the highest values of vegetative traits, followed by 75% NPK and ultimately 50% NPK. In the first and second seasons, the 100% NPK dose significantly resulted in the tallest PH (93.93 and 95.15 cm), the highest BN (21.87 and 22.90 branches/plant), the thickest PSD (0.53 and 0.54 cm), the largest LA (60.32 and 62.51 cm2/leaf), the highest CI (55.87 and 57.78 SPAD units), and the heaviest SFW (831.0 and 837.85 g/plant), SDW (207.73 and 209.45 g/plant), RFW (265.00 and 277.40 g/plant), and RDW (71.26 and 75.50 g/plant), respectively.
Conversely, all vegetative parameters were improved after spraying ADY, GT, and SW extracts individually or together relative to the untreated plants (control) during both experimental seasons (Tables 4-6). The significantly highest values of PH (96.61 and 99.08 cm), BN (23.00 and 23.50 branches/plant), CI (58.93 and 61.83 SPAD units), SFW (846.81 and 855.46 g/plant), SDW (207.58 and 209.73 g/plant), RFW (266.44 and 277.33 g/plant), and RDW (76.33 and 79.33 g/plant) had been recorded for the 3 g L-1 ADY treatment. In the same manner, the application of 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW and 1.5 mL L-1 SW treatments resulted in high significant values of PSD (0.57 and 0.58 cm) and LA (58.85 and 60.49 cm2/leaf) in both seasons, respectively. The least significant values of PH (65.78 and 67.16 cm), BN (13.56 and 14.83 branches/plant), PSD (0.38 and 0.41 cm), LA (47.52 and 45.92 cm2/leaf), CI (44.40 and 45.18 SPAD units), SFW (695.07 and 701.64 g/plant), SDW (170.63 and 172.22 g/plant), RFW (189.77 and 198.00 g/plant), and RDW (46.55 and 49.67 g/plant) were recorded for unsprayed control plants in the two seasons, respectively. Meanwhile, the differences among the treatments of natural extracts reached a significant level (P ≤ 0.05) in most cases during both seasons. Additionally, the data in Tables 4-6 indicate that 100% NPK combined with 3 g L-1 ADY led to the highest positively significant enhancement in vegetative traits, except for PSD whose higher values were recorded for the plants that received 100% NPK and sprayed with 1.5 mL L-1 SW and 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT +1 mL L-1 SW in the two seasons. Conversely, the plants fertilized with 50% NPK without spraying of any extract resulted in the least significant values of vegetative traits in the both seasons. The other combinations between NPK doses and natural extracts recorded intermediate values of vegetative traits with significant differences among themselves in most cases during the two seasons.
3.2 Relative water content
It can be noted from the data in Table 7 that the fertilized plants with either 100% NPK or 75% NPK had a higher RWC with the same level of significance (72.50% and 75.90% in the first season and 74.24% and 73.63% in the second one) in comparison with the fertilized plants by 50% NPK that had lower significance of relative water content (69.63% and 70.20%) in the two seasons. Moreover, the plants sprayed with 3 g L-1 ADY had the highest significant values of RWC (75.08% and 75.44%), while the untreated control plants had the least significant values of this item (66.98% and 68.05%) in both seasons. In the first season, the difference between ADY and GT or among GT, SW, and 1.0 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW treatments did not reach a significant level (P ≤ 0.05). This fact is between SW and 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1.0 mL L-1 SW treatments in the second season. Furthermore, the combined applications of 100% NPK with 3 g L-1 ADY or 0.5 g L-1 GT extracts caused a higher significance of RWC at 76.87% and 75.38% in the first season and 77.16% and 77.50% in the second one, respectively. On the contrary, the plants that received 50% NPK without treating their leaves with natural extract had a lower significant RWC of 60.79% and 62.34% for the two seasons, respectively. The RWC indicated that the differences among the most combinations of NPK doses and natural extracts used did not reach a significant level in both seasons.
Table 7
| NPK doses (g/plant) | Natural extracts | RWC% | Total carbohydrates% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st season | 2nd Season | 1st season | 2nd season | ||
| 100% NPK | 72.50 ± 0.35 A | 74.24 ± 0.02 A | 23.94 ± 0.44 A | 25.52 ± 0.27 A | |
| 75% NPK | 72.90 ± 0.08 A | 73.63 ± 0.35 A | 22.70 ± 0.14 B | 23.44 ± 0.08 B | |
| 50% NPK | 69.63 ± 0.92 B | 70.20 ± 0.39 B | 22.06 ± 0.38 B | 21.93 ± 0.19 C | |
| Control | 66.98 ± 0.52 C | 68.05 ± 0.14 D | 16.36 ± 0.05 E | 17.08 ± 0.17 D | |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 75.08 ± 0.13 A | 75.44 ± 0.11 A | 27.64 ± 0.07 A | 27.87 ± 0.03 A | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 72.91 ± 0.91 AB | 74.31 ± 0.01 B | 20.17 ± 0.14 D | 21.35 ± 0.07 B | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 71.94 ± 1.01 B | 73.07 ± 0.20 C | 23.44 ± 0.04 C | 24.13 ± 0.01 C | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 71.68 ± 0.93 B | 72.60 ± 0.08 C | 26.90 ± 0.26 B | 27.72 ± 0.21 A | |
| 100% NPK | Control | 71.62 ± 1.75 c-f | 72.86 ± 1.23 def | 17.66 ± 0.66a | 18.54 ± 0.55a |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 76.87 ± 0.41 a | 77.16 ± 0.29 cde | 30.12 ± 0.84a | 31.84 ± 0.42a | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 75.38 ± 2.13 abc | 77.50 ± 0.15 a | 22.15 ± 0.56a | 22.63 ± 0.28a | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 68.26 ± 2.24 ef | 70.41 ± 0.65 gh | 25.45 ± 1.18a | 26.47 ± 0.61a | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 73.08 ± 0.33 a-d | 73.29 ± 0.25 c-f | 28.74 ± 0.67a | 28.12 ± 0.55a | |
| 75% NPK | Control | 67.93 ± 1.19 f | 68.95 ± 0.60 h | 16.22 ± 1.10a | 17.17 ± 0.55a |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 74.58 ± 0.32 abc | 74.82 ± 0.20 bc | 27.14 ± 1.38a | 26.33 ± 0.69a | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 73.10 ± 0.98 a-d | 73.80 ± 0.69 cde | 21.32 ± 0.56a | 21.81 ± 0.28a | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 75.50 ± 0.90 ab | 76.12 ± 0.65 ab | 23.14 ± 0.90a | 23.93 ± 0.45a | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 73.39 ± 1.35 a-d | 74.48 ± 0.80 bcd | 25.30 ± 0.77a | 27.95 ± 0.42a | |
| 50% NPK | Control | 60.79 ± 1.57 g | 62.34 ± 0.22 i | 15.02 ± 0.59a | 15.53 ± 0.30a |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 73.80 ± 0.60 a-d | 74.35 ± 0.25 a | 24.80 ± 0.75a | 25.45 ± 0.38a | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 70.26 ± 1.48 def | 71.63 ± 0.55 fg | 19.00 ± 0.69a | 19.60 ± 0.35a | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 72.06 ± 0.86 b-e | 72.68 ± 0.60 ef | 21.64 ± 0.40a | 21.99 ± 0.20a | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 68.56 ± 1.50 ef | 70.03 ± 0.32 gh | 26.51 ± 0.66a | 27.09 ± 0.32a | |
Effect of NPK doses, natural extracts, and their interaction on relative water content% and total carbohydrates% of C. erectus in the 2022 and 2023 seasons.
Means that have identical letters within a column are non-significant (P ≤ 0.05) according to DMRT.
3.3 Leaf nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and total carbohydrate percentages
The data on total carbohydrates (TC) (Table 7), N%, P%, and K% (Table 8) show that the percentages of these traits were differently impacted in response to the NPK levels used in the two seasons. Moreover, the 100% NPK resulted in higher percentages of N, P, K, and total carbohydrate, recorded as 2.94%, 0.56%, 3.62%, and 23.94% in the first season and 2.98%, 0.61%, 3.65%, and 25.52% in the second season, respectively. Conversely, the 50% NPK dose suggested lower significant N, P, K and TC% values in the first season, resulting in 2.82%, 0.40%, 3.07%, and 22.08%, and in the second one recorded as 2.88%, 0.42%, 2.54%, and 21.93%, respectively.
Table 8
| NPK doses (g/plant) | Natural extracts | N (%) | P (%) | K (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st season | 2nd season | 1st season | 2nd season | 1st season | 2nd season | ||
| 100% NPK | 2.94 ± 0.03A | 2.98 ± 0.03 A | 0.56 ± 0.01 A | 0.61 ± 0.02A | 3.62 ± 0.12 A | 3.65 ± 0.12 A | |
| 75% NPK | 2.89 ± 0.03A | 2.89 ± 0.02 B | 0.47 ± 0.01B | 0.51 ± 0.02 B | 3.27 ± 0.11 B | 3.37 ± 0.13 B | |
| 50% NPK | 2.82 ± 0.03A | 2.88 ± 0.02 B | 0.40 ± 0.01 C | 0.42 ± 0.00 C | 3.07 ± 0.03 C | 2.54 ± 0.09 C | |
| Control | 2.62 ± 0.01 B | 2.71 ± 0.02 C | 0.38 ± 0.03 B | 0.41 ± 0.03 C | 2.60 ± 0.04 D | 2.75 ± 0.04 D | |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 2.98 ± 0.05 A | 3.00 ± 0.05 A | 0.46 ± 0.00 B | 0.50 ± 0.02 B | 4.12 ± 0.03 A | 4.15 ± 0.03 A | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 2.91 ± 0.01 A | 2.93 ± 0.01 B | 0.45 ± 0.01 B | 0.47 ± 0.01 BC | 3.56 ± 0.02 B | 3.06 ± 0.19 C | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 2.96 ± 0.03 A | 2.99 ± 0.02 A | 0.47 ± 0.00 B | 0.53 ± 0.01 B | 3.04 ± 0.02 C | 3.09 ± 0.03 C | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 2.94 ± 0.03 A | 2.96 ± 0.02 AB | 0.64 ± 0.00 A | 0.68 ± 0.01 A | 3.79 ± 0.02 B | 3.85 ± 0.02 B | |
| 100% NPK | Control | 2.60 ± 0.23 ef | 2.70 ± 0.12 hi | 0.50 ± 0.01 b–e | 0.33 ± 0.04 h | 2.81 ± 0.07 e | 2.85 ± 0.03 d |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 3.10 ± 0.03 a–d | 3.15 ± 0.01 cd | 0.51 ± 0.07 b–e | 0.47 ± 0.00 ef | 4.60 ± 0.06 a | 4.60 ± 0.06 a | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 2.95 ± 0.03 a–d | 2.97 ± 0.01 cd | 0.55 ± 0.05 bcd | 0.37 ± 0.01 gh | 3.08 ± 0.04 e | 3.08 ± 0.04 d | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 3.05 ± 0.03 ab | 3.07 ± 0.01 ab | 0.64 ± 0.14 ab | 0.40 ± 0.00 gh | 3.09 ± 0.04 e | 3.13 ± 0.01 d | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 2.98 ± 0.06 abc | 2.99 ± 0.03 cd | 0.61 ± 0.06 abc | 0.56 ± 0.02 cd | 4.51 ± 0.09 a | 4.58 ± 0.04 a | |
| 75% NPK | Control | 2.75 ± 0.03 de | 2.77 ± 0.01 gh | 0.35 ± 0.03 ef | 0.38 ± 0.01 gh | 2.74 ± 0.62 ef | 3.08 ± 0.52 d |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 2.88 ± 0.01 bcd | 2.89 ± 0.01 ef | 0.42 ± 0.07 def | 0.47 ± 0.03 ef | 4.16 ± 0.07 ab | 4.21 ± 0.04 b | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 2.83 ± 0.01 cd | 2.84 ± 0.01 fg | 0.42 ± 0.01 def | 0.43 ± 0.00 fg | 3.18 ± 0.03 de | 3.18 ± 0.03 d | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 3.00 ± 0.06 abc | 3.05 ± 0.03 bc | 0.41 ± 0.03 def | 0.43 ± 0.02 efg | 3.14 ± 0.05 de | 3.21 ± 0.01 d | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 2.88 ± 0.04 bcd | 2.91 ± 0.02 def | 0.77 ± 0.06 a | 0.81 ± 0.04 a | 3.14 ± 0.04 de | 3.16 ± 0.02 c | |
| 50% NPK | Control | 2.50 ± 0.01 f | 2.65 ± 0.01 i | 0.29 ± 0.05 f | 0.51 ± 0.01 de | 2.26 ± 0.05 f | 2.33 ± 0.03 e |
| 3 g L-1 ADY | 2.95 ± 0.06 a | 2.97 ± 0.03 a | 0.47 ± 0.00 cde | 0.57 ± 0.04 cd | 3.59 ± 0.07 cd | 3.64 ± 0.04 c | |
| 0.5 g L-1 GT | 2.95 ± 0.03 a–d | 2.97 ± 0.01 cd | 0.36 ± 0.02 e | 0.60 ± 0.02 bc | 2.91 ± 0.02 e | 2.93 ± 0.01 d | |
| 1.5 mL L-1 SW | 2.83 ± 0.01 cd | 2.84 ± 0.01 fg | 0.36 ± 0.02 ef | 0.75 ± 0.07 a | 2.90 ± 0.04 e | 2.93 ± 0.03 d | |
| 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW | 2.95 ± 0.03 a–d | 2.96 ± 0.02 cd | 0.53 ± 0.03 bcd | 0.66 ± 0.04 b | 3.72 ± 0.70 bc | 3.80 ± 0.03 c | |
Effect of NPK doses, natural extracts, and their interaction on nitrogen (%), phosphorus (%), and potassium (%) of C. erectus in the 2022 and 2023 seasons.
Means that have the same letters within a column are non-significant (P ≤ 0.05) according to DMRT.
The natural extracts used caused positive effects in increasing N, P, K, and TC% over the untreated control treatment. Furthermore, spraying 3 g L-1 ADY gave higher N (2.98% and 3.80%), K (4.12% and 4.15%), and TC (27.64% and 27.87%) in the two seasons, respectively. The plant leaves treated with 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW contained higher percentages of P (0.64% and 0.68%) for both seasons. Regardless of the control, the differences among the treatments of natural extracts reached a significant level in some cases, especially in the case of TC in the two seasons.
Concerning the interaction impact of NPK doses and natural extracts, the data in Tables 7 and 8 demonstrate that the leaves of plants fertilized with 100% NPK and sprayed with 3 gL-1 ADY contained higher TC% (30.12% and 31.84%), N% (3.10% and 3.15%), and K% (4.60% and 4.60%) in the both seasons, respectively. The leaves of plants that received 75% NPK and were sprayed with 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW contained higher P% (0.77% and 0.81%) in the two seasons. Conversely, lower significant percentages of N (2.50% and 2.65%), P (0.29% and 0.33%), K (2.26% and 2.33%), and TC (15.02% and 15.53%) were found in the leaves of plants fertilized with 50% NPK and not sprayed with any natural extract used in the two seasons.
3.4 Antioxidant enzyme activity
The activities of CAT, POD, and PPO enzymes were significantly affected by the application of NPK doses. The 75% NPK caused a higher significant CAT activity (35.48 mM H2O2 g-1 FW min-1) in comparison with 100% and 50% NPK which recorded 33.13 and 33.74 mM H2O2 g-1 FW min-1, respectively (Figure 1a), with the same significance level. Meanwhile, the leaves of fertilized plants with 100% NPK had the highest significant POD activity (10.80 unit-mg-1 protein min-1, followed by 75% NPK (9.76 unit-mg-1 protein min-1), and ultimately 50% NPK (7.74 unit-mg-1 protein min-1) (Figure 1c). At the same time, 100% and 75% caused a higher significant PPO activity (15.06 and 15.97 unit-mg-1 protein min-1, respectively) with the same significance level. In the second rank lies 50% NPK which enriched the PPO activity to 13.71 unit-mg-1 protein min-1 (Figure 1e). All treatments of natural extracts increased the activities of CAT (Figure 1a), POD (Figure 1c), and PPO (Figure 1e) more than the control treatment. Moreover, the leaves of plants sprayed with 3 g L-1 ADY had the largest significant activities of such enzymes when compared to the other natural extracts used. Under the application of 3 g L-1 ADY, the CAT activity reached 38.89 mM H2O2 g-1 FW min-1, and the POD and PPO activities reached 11.5 and 17.85 unit-mg-1 protein min-1, respectively. Meanwhile, a lower significant activity was found in the leaves of control plants at 31.44 mM H2O2 g-1 FW min-1 for CAT and 7.83 and 13.14 unit-mg-1 protein min-1 for POD, and PPO, respectively.
Figure 1
Meantime, the interaction of combinations between NPK doses and natural extracts exhibited various effects on CAT, POD, and PPO activities. The combined 3 g L-1 ADY with 100%, 75%, and 50% NPK levels caused a significantly higher CAT activity (Figure 1b) reaching 39.50, 39.90, and 37.26 mM H2O2 g-1FW min-1, respectively, which took place at the level of significance. On the other hand, the combinations of 3 g L-1 ADY and 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW with either 100% NPK or 75% NPK doses were the best for activating POD enzyme, reaching 12.86, 11.20, 11.20, and 11.26 unit-mg-1 protein min-1, respectively (Figure 1d). However, the activity of PPO enzyme reached 18.80 unit-mg-1 protein min-1 after utilizing 3 g L-1 ADY with 75% NPK (Figure 1f). Conversely, the least activities of CAT, POD, and PPO were noticed in the levels of plants fertilized with 50% NPK without spraying with any natural extracts, containing 29.56 mM H2O2 g-1 FW min-1, and 6.23 and 10.83 unit-mg-1 protein min-1, respectively. Additionally, the impacts of the various combinations of NPK doses and natural extracts on enzyme activity were significant in some cases for either CAT or POD but not significant in the case of PPO (P ≤ 0.05).
3.5 Leaf total phenol compounds and antioxidant activity
Total phenol compounds (TPCs) and antioxidant activity (AOA) were significantly affected by the application of various NPK doses (Figures 2a, c), whereas 100% NPK was the best in enhancing TPCs and AOA at 14.69 mg/g DW and 0.04 μM TE/10 g DW, respectively. Moreover, as the NPK level decreased, the TPCs and AOA decreased. On the other hand, such parameters showed significant differences under various natural extracts used (Figures 2a, c). The use of 3 g L-1 ADY and 1 g L-1 ADY + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW treatments resulted in higher significant values of TPCs (13.69 and 13.59 mg/g DW) and AOA (0.039 and 0.038 μM TE/10 g DW), respectively, with the same significance level (P ≤ 0.05). It is noticed that all of the natural extracts used significantly improved such two parameters relative to the control treatment which gave lower significant values (13.28 mg/g DW and 0.031 μM TE/10 g DW, respectively). In regard to the NPK levels and natural extracts used, the interaction data listed in Figures 2b, d show that the leaves of plants fertilized with 100% NPK and sprayed with either 3 g L-1 ADY or 1 g L-1 AD + 0.2 g L-1 GT + 1 mL L-1 SW had the highest significant values of TPCs (15.01 and 14.88 mg/g DW) and AOA (0.047 and 0.045 μM TE/10 g DW), respectively, and the two treatments took place at the same significance level (P ≤ 0.05). Conversely, the plants fertilized with 50% NPK without receiving any natural extract showed that their leaves have lower significant values of TPCs (11.96 mg/g DW) and AOA (0.025 μM TE/10 g DW). The differences among the combinations of NPK doses and natural extracts used did not reach a significant level in most cases.
Figure 2
4 Discussion
4.1 Impact of N, P, K fertilizers on vegetative, chemical, and biochemical traits
N, P, and K are the major nutrients for high-quality plant traits, and proper utilization can positively enhance plant growth and structure (; ). A close relationship exists among nutrients, soil, and plants, whereby soil fertility—which influences plant traits—is, in turn, affected by the appropriateness of the fertilizers used (; ). Our study showed that 100% NPK dose was the most effective rate in increasing the vegetative traits and chemical and biochemical parameters except for RWC (in the first season) and the activity of CAT and PPO where 75% NPK was optimal. NPK fertilizers also have essential roles in plant physiological processes such as in enhancing enzyme activities, in the translocation of carbohydrates as a product of photosynthesis process, and in cell division and elongation, which essentially affect a plant’s nutritional status. NPK application leads to an increase in IAA level and photosynthesis process efficiency, thus raising carbohydrate production (), which improves the traits being studied. Additionally, NPK have important roles in protoplasm formation and element biosynthesis for several compounds within plant cells, like amino acids, nucleic acids, amides, proteins, building chlorophyll, activation of some enzymes, meristematic growth, and energy-carrying formation (; ). concluded as well that proper NPK availability is best matched to a higher N uptake which, in turn, improves the quantity of mesophyll cells and chloroplasts and chlorophyll stability, raising the content of chlorophyll in plants. Relevant research have clarified that suitable fertilization of N, P, and K can effectively raise the leaves’ and soil’s nutrient content, thereby boosting plant yield and quality (; ; ). The N, P, and K proportions are often unbalanced owing to the scientific ratio lacking in actual production, which lead to the plant absorption and nutrient application being affected, a decrease in yield and quality, and increased risk of nutrient loss and habitat contamination. Thus, the N, P, and K appropriate ratio can positively enhance plant growth and decrease the usage of various fertilizers relatively (). According to , 75 kg N/ha as urea significantly improved chamomile growth and flowering. In addition, reported that biomass production of lettuce can be maximized by the proper management of fertilizer. Conversely, the overuse application of fertilizer can cause disease episodes which can negatively affect leaf and root development and nitrate accumulation. Rose leaf dry weight and chlorophyll content were significantly increased by NPK application at 5 g L-1 (). Our results confirm the findings of who found that different combinations of N, P, and K significantly increased the leaf area index, chlorophyll, soluble sugar, starch, and N, P, and K contents of Sapindus mukorossi leaves. Also, concluded that 2 g/pot applied three times with a 15-day interval positively improved chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids, percentages of total carbohydrates, N, P, K, total indoles, and total phenols in the leaves of Tagetes erecta. Related to this concern, , in their study on Chrysanthemum morifolium, found that significant increases in plant height, number of branches/plant, leaf area, fresh and dry weight, flowering span, total fresh and dry weight of flowers, and chlorophyll content values were gained up to 300 kg N/ha. The tallest plants, the biggest number of branches, and the highest chlorophyll index of Turnera ulmifolia were recorded under the application of NPK (15:15:15) at 0.2 g/plant for three time with a 1-month interval (). As clarified by , the combination of N, P2O5, and K2O at 330, 196, and 450 kg/ha, respectively, significantly produced the highest values of plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area in the seedling stage of Chrysanthemum morifolium, while the highest significant values of such traits and chlorophyll content resulted from N, P2O5, and K2O at 330, 196, and 300 kg/ha, respectively, during the branching and flowering stages. Indeed to avoid the harmful impact of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the plants should have an effective antioxidant system. The defense systems produce enzymes which help repair the toxicity brought about by ROS and enhance the stability of plants to resist diseases. PPO, POD, CAT, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) act as defense-related enzymes that have an essential role on this concern (; ). Total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity have beneficial functions in plant protection. TPCs have hydroxyl groups which play significant roles against ROS. Therefore, TPCs in plants can be immediately matched to their AOA (). Furthermore, it has been found that phenols have antioxidant characteristics and have a distinct role in the system of enzyme activity and essential metabolic production (). Moreover, there is an efficient role between phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity, which is good for plants according to studies on sunflower (), rosemary (), lavender (), and sweet basil (). More studies discovered that various doses of N, P, and K affect the secondary metabolite production in plants (; ). Similarly, application of K2SO4 as a foliar spray on Bouhouli trees led to an actual change in total phenolic and flavonoid content and an increase in chlorogenic acid relative to the control (). As verified by , the production of PAL and POD in the flowers of Chrysanthemum morifolium was increased by the utilization of 330 kg N + 196 kg P2O2 + 450 kg K2O per ha and 330 kg N + 196 kg P2O5 + 300 kg K2O per ha, respectively, in comparison with the control. Thus, 100% NPK significantly improved the chemical and biochemical contents in C. erectus, consequently resulting in good growth and aesthetic view for landscaping purposes.
4.2 Impact of natural extracts on vegetative, chemical, and biochemical traits
Our results suggested positive effects of the natural extracts used, especially ADY, on the studied parameters compared with the respective controls. The exogenous or foliar utilization of ADY, GT, and SW extracts either separately or together is an effective method because these extracts can be easily taken up by the leaves of plants and then translocated to the other plant organs. This leads to regulating and enhancing the metabolic processes in plant cells and decreasing the undesirable habitat effects. The literature highlighted the useful impacts of natural extracts on the various processes in cells of plants as ADY which increased the proline content and antioxidant enzymes and decreased the oxidative stress () or decreased the lipid peroxidation (). Moreover, using ADY boosted the leaf N, P, K, TC, RWC, antioxidant enzymes (PPO, POD, and CAT), TPCs, and AOA, subsequently improving the growth traits via its contents of macro and micro nutrients, hormones, vitamins, proteins, carbohydrate, amino acids, and lipids (; ). Furthermore, ADY extract has a useful role in vegetative growth and productivity stages with enhanced flower formation in some plants, which refers to its high auxin and cytokinin levels. It also improves the accumulation of carbohydrates (). Furthermore, they added that ADY extract has stimulatory impacts on cell division and elongation, protein and nucleic acid synthesis, and formation of chlorophyll. According to , ADY as foliar spray at 2 g L-1 enhanced the vegetative growth and root traits of Chinese carnation. They added that the combination between ADY at 2 mL L-1 and organic fertilizer (Algidex) at 2 or 4 mL L-1 increased the outmost vegetative, flower, and root traits of Chinese carnation. In a study of on calendula plants, they concluded that foliar application with ADY at 4, 8, and 12 g L-1 caused increases in vegetative and flower traits, leaf contents of total chlorophyll, percentages of N, P, K, and RWC, and enzyme activity (PPO, POD, CAT, and SOD) in comparison with the control plants. Furthermore, they found that such levels of ADY reduced EL relative to the control plants of calendula. Moreover, ADY at 12 g L-1 positively enhanced the vegetative traits, total chlorophyll, carbohydrates, phenols, sugar, activities of PPO, CAT, and SOD of cowpea. The results demonstrated as well that the combination of 24-epibrassinolide (10 μM) and ADY (12 g L-1) was the best among the other combinations of such materials in promoting seed yield, POD weight, and the chlorophyll content of cowpea (). Most importantly, several studies have demonstrated the beneficial influences of seaweed extract on the morphological characteristics of plants and their chemical and biochemical contents, with subsequent encouragement in all physiological, and biochemical processes in plant cells by the contents of SW from different essential nutrients, hormones, amino acids, and polysaccharides (; ; ). At low levels, SW extracts can cause various physiological plant responses, including improved plant growth, enhanced blooming and production, and elevated mineral content (; ). The improvement effect of SW extracts on the vegetative, chemical, and biochemical traits of C. erectus was compared to the control. This was due to SW composition that, like the natural growth hormones (auxins and cytokinins), enhances plant growth by raising the number of metabolic events (cell division and enlargement), in turn causing an increase in vegetative aspects (). Additionally, SW extract has a marked amount of macronutrients and micronutrients that have an essential role in the activation of many enzymes and coenzymes, which are employed in various biological processes, causing cell division and enlargement (). Additionally, algae have been applied to improve plant performance and tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses due to their useful bio-stimulant content ().
Numerous studies on rose plants (), Lantana camara and Abelia x grandiflora shrubs (), Citrullus lanatus (), Kiwifruit (), and strawberry (), have reported that the plants subjected to SW extracts as foliar application had a boost in growth traits and chemical and biochemical contents. concluded that treating sweet pepper with 3 g L-1 of ADY (a soil addition) combined with 3 g L-1 SW extract (as a foliar application) executed plausible results in terms of plant height, leaf area, and fresh and dry weight. The highest fruit values of carbohydrate, P, and K were achieved from the addition of folic acid plus seaweed extract at 3 g L-1. They added that the use of effective microorganisms and extracts of ADY and SW could lead to an increase in growth, element contents, activity of enzymes, fruit yield, and quality and nutritional value of sweet pepper fruit and also reduction of environmental contamination. According to , the utilization of SW extract at 1 or 3 g L-1 led to an increment in growth and biomass of hemp relative to the untreated control. The synergistic method of SW also effectively decreased H2O2 production, the accumulation of proline, and malondialdehyde generation but boosted the content of soluble sugars and protein relative to the control. They added that the cumulative effect of Cu stress can be avoidable with the application of the combination of SW extract + biochar + arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which resulted in increases in growth biomass, activity of antioxidant enzymes, and osmoprotectant contents via mitigating the accumulation of Cu. Furthermore, there are no studies on the effect of GT on the growth, chemical and biochemical contents, and physiological processes of C. erectus cells. This study has focused on the role of GT as a natural extract in the growth of plants and its attributes. The enhancement in the studied traits of C. erectus due to the application of GT may be attributed to its contents (tannins, volatile oil, caffeine, and the active polyphenol) which have stimulant effects. Moreover, its contents are from nutrients and vitamins, and these boost enzyme activity (). Additionally, antioxidants in GT (catechin and tocophenol) have a distinct role in the maintenance of cells against ROS, which leads to the destruction of proteins, lipids, and DNA, thereby keeping the cells from aging and stimulating the vegetative growth of plants (; ).
Our results corresponded with those of who found that various levels of GT significantly boosted the leaves’ dry weight and the leaf area of Keitte mango. The 50 mg L-1 GT leaf extract promoted the seedling growth of Allium cepa under salt stress (). showed that GT extract at 0.05%–2% had a favorable impact on all of the growth traits and nutritional levels of Barhee date plants. Furthermore, our results were supported by the results of on aralia plants; he found that using GT extract at 0.1%–0.8% as foliar spray caused increments in plant height, number of leaves/plant, stem diameter, leaf area, number of branches/plant, fresh and dry weight of leaves, stems, and roots/plant, as well as leaf N%, P%, and K% and chl. a, b, and total chl. relative to the untreated plants. The study of on the variety of caster (Zibo and Camencita) revealed that 75 mL L-1 GT extract achieved the highest dry weight of leaves and number of fruits/plant. Our results indicated that applying 3 g L-1 ADY is superior than the treatments using other natural extracts in enhancing the studied traits of C. erectus and may be due to 3 g L-1 ADY having more macronutrients and micronutrients, natural growth hormones, amino acids, proteins, lipids, polychloride compounds, enzymes, and carbohydrates. All of these materials lead to improved cell division and enlargement, increased plant nutrient contents, enhanced photosynthesis, carbohydrate accumulation, and enzyme activities as well as alleviating the harmful impacts of ROS. All of these lead to improved plant growth and development.
4.3 Impact of the interaction between NPK doses and natural extracts used on vegetative, chemical, and biochemical treats
The different combinations among NPK levels and natural extracts used caused considerable increases in the studied parameters over the application of NPK doses alone. Moreover, the combined 100% NPK dose with 3 g L-1 ADY was the best for the given high values of vegetative traits, chlorophyll index, RWC, enzyme activity (except CAT and PPO), TPCs, and AOA of C. erectus. These findings indicate that 100% NPK plus 3 g L-1 ADY have a significant amount of macronutrients and micronutrients in addition to the contents of ADY from stimulant compounds mentioned before. Our findings are consistent with those reported by in their study on annual chrysanthemum, where N and K were identified as essential components of chlorophyll, proteins, and amino acids. They noted that increased applications of N and K can enhance chlorophyll content, promote photosynthesis, and subsequently improve plant growth. Similarly, observed the greatest enhancement in the leaf chemical composition of Tagetes erecta var. dwarf chrysanthemum—including the levels of N, P, K, total carbohydrates, chlorophyll a and b, total phenols, total indoles, and carotenoids—when plants were treated with 2 g pot-1 of NPK combined with SW extract at a concentration of 2 g L-1.
Previously, reported that treating sage plants with 75% NPK of the recommended dose combined with biofertilizer (Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus megaterium var. phosphaticum, and B. cereus) achieved the highest significant results of plant height, number of branches, fresh and dry weight, carbohydrate, chlorophylls, total phenol compounds, and antioxidants. Additionally, the application of yeast at 8 g L-1 plus chitosan at 300 mM caused an increase in plant height, RWC, chlorophyll a and b content, regulated antioxidant enzyme activities, and reduced oxidative stress signs in stressed garlic plants (). Previously, documented that 75% NPK of the recommended dose plus effective microorganisms at 100 mL-1 per shrub was the best positive application to improve the vegetative growth of Jatropha curcas. Furthermore, found that the combinations of seaweed and mixture of micronutrients at 1 and 2 mL L-1 significantly enhanced the vegetative and flowering traits of Dianthus chinensis and Gazania splender. found that 10 g/plant NPK combined with 12 mL L-1 liquid organic fertilizer resulted in the best values of growth and yield parameters of the bean plant. In addition, , on China aster cv. “Azka × Kamini”, showed that treatment with 75% NPK dose + Azotobacter, PSB, and KSB biofertilizer + 0.5% SW extract reduced the lethal rate and increased the survival%, seedling height, and vigor indices. Thus, the combinations among NPK levels and natural extract (individually or together), especially 100% NPK with 3 g L-1 ADY, induced improvements in leaf chemical nutrients (N%, P%, and K%), chlorophyll index, RWC%, biochemical compounds (carbohydrate, activity of CAT, POD, and PPO, TPCs, and AOA) via sufficient amounts of essential elements of 100% NPK dose and natural extracts used. In particular, ADY plus the different biochemical compounds of ADY, SW, and GT mentioned previously account for the growth, development, and, consequently, good aesthetic characteristics of C. erectus for landscape purposes.
5 Conclusion
This study highlights the effectiveness of integrating chemical fertilizers (NPK) with natural extracts (ADY, GT, and SW) in enhancing the overall performance of C. erectus, particularly its chemical and biochemical attributes. The combined application of natural extracts and chemical fertilizers positively influences plant growth by promoting physiological, chemical, and biochemical processes as well as enhancing cell division and elongation, ultimately leading to improved growth characteristics. The application of 100% NPK, 3 g L-1 ADY, and their combination produced the most significant improvements in the vegetative, chemical, and biochemical traits of C. erectus. The addition of 3 g L-1 ADY can enhance nutrient uptake efficiency and potentially reduce the need for applying NPK fertilizers beyond the suggested 100% dose. Therefore, the integration of NPK with natural extracts, particularly ADY, can be utilized to enhance the aesthetic qualities of C. erectus for landscape applications while simultaneously reducing environmental contamination associated with excessive chemical fertilizer use. Further studies on the nutritional requirements of ornamental shrubs and trees are essential to develop optimal fertilization regimes tailored to each species.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
E-SE-M: Project administration, Formal Analysis, Validation, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Methodology. HG: Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis, Software, Methodology, Data curation. KA: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. HM: Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Software. AE-T: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Software. WA: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Software. TA: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Software. HA: Data curation, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Software, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by Ongoing Research Funding program Supporting Project number (ORF-2025-123), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Ongoing Researchers Supporting Project number (ORF-2025-123), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1616150/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Abdel AalA.AbdelazizF.AhmedF.MohamedA.Abdel-HalimS. (2021). Effect of spraying some plant oils and green tea extracts on growth and nutritional status of Barhee date palms grown under Aswan region conditions. SVU-Inter. J. Agric. Sci.3, 1–11. doi: 10.21608/svuijas.2021.60560.1078
2
AbdelaalK.AttiaK. A.NiedbałaG.WojciechowskiT.HafezY.AlameryS.et al. (2021). Mitigation of drought damages by exogenous chitosan and yeast extract with modulating the photosynthetic pigments, antioxidant defense system and improving the productivity of garlic plants. Hortic7, 510. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7110510
3
AebiH. (1984). Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymology105, 121–126. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3
4
AhmedA. F.AttiaF. A.LiuZ.LiC.WeiJ.KangJ. (2019). Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of essential oils and extracts of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) plants. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness8, 299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2019.07.004
5
AhmedF. F.KamelM. K.IbrahimH. I. (2014). The synergistic effects of using plant extracts and salicylic acid on yield and fruit quality of Keitte mango trees. Stem Cell5, 30–39.
6
Al-HamzawiM. K. (2019). “Effect of seaweed extract and micronutrients mixture on some growth characters and flowering of Dianthus chinensis l. and Gazania splender l. plants,” in J. Physics: Conference Series (IOP Publishing).
7
AlhasanA. S.KhadimA. A.Al-AmeriD. T.SalehO. S.Al-AlwashF. H. J.KadkimH. R. (2022). “Effect of applying different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and essential oil of chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.),” in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Sci (IOP Publishing).
8
AliE.HussainS.HussainN.KakarK. U.ShahJ. M.ZaidiS. H. R.et al. (2022). Tocopherol as plant protector: An overview of Tocopherol biosynthesis enzymes and their role as antioxidant and signaling molecules. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum44, 20. doi: 10.1007/s11738-021-03350-x
9
Al-KhafajiA. M.Al-AmriN.Al-DulaimiN. (2022). Growth, yield, and antioxidant traits of different parts of beetroot as affected by vermicompost and glutathione. Iraqi J. Agric. Sci.53, 1107–1114. doi: 10.36103/ijas.v53i5.1623
10
AlkhafajiA.KhalilN. (2019). Effect of fertilization, rootstocks and growth stimulant on growth of Citrus limon L. sapling. Iraqi J. Agric. Sci.50, 990–1000.
11
Al-MarsoumiF.HameedA.-H.EAM. (2020). Effect of humic acid and seaweed extract spray in leaf mineral content of mango seedlings. Plant Arch.20, 827–83020205.
12
AlzandiA. A.NaguibD. M. (2022). Effect of yeast application on soil health and root metabolic status of corn seedlings under drought stress. Arch. Microbiol.204, 233. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-02843-8
13
AmerS. (2004). Growth, green pods yield and seeds yield of commom bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) as affected by active dry yeast, salicylic acid and their interaction. J. Plant Prod.29, 1407–1422. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2004.238589
14
AmerH. M.SalemS.SalaheldinS.HusseinM.Abd El-FatahS. I. (2019). The growth, chemical composition and evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Salvia officinalis oil under partial substitution of mineral NPK fertilizer by bio-fertilizer. Mid. East. J.8, 8, 457–468.
15
Arastech FarA.MadvarA. R.TohidfarM.YousefiK. (2013). Investigation of the effects of yeast extract on isoflavone synthase gene expression and some biochemical parameters in Glycine max seedlings. Agric. Biotecnol. J.5, 1–18.
16
ArioliT.MattnerS. W.HepworthG.McClintockD.McClinockR. (2021). Effect of seaweed extract application on wine grape yield in Australia. J. Appl. Phycol.33, 1883–1891. doi: 10.1007/s10811-021-02423-1
17
ArmstrongL.do CarmoM. A. V.WuY.EsmerinoL. A.AzevedoL.ZhangL.et al. (2020). Optimizing the extraction of bioactive compounds from pu-erh tea (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) and evaluation of antioxidant, cytotoxic, antimicrobial, antihemolytic, and inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities. Food Res. Inter.137, 109430.
18
AsadiS. Y.ParsaeiP.KarimiM.EzzatiS.ZamiriA.MohammadizadehF.et al. (2013). Effect of green tea (Camellia sinensis) extract on healing process of surgical wounds in rat. Inter. J. Surg.11, 332–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.02.014
19
BaghA. S.DeepikaV.SinghS.MishraS.EkkaS. K.KujurR.et al. (2024). Foliar application of seaweed extract and micronutrients on plant growth and yield of strawberry (Fragaria X Annanassa Duch) cv. Winter dawn: A review. Asian J. Biol.20, 25–31. doi: 10.9734/ajob/2024/v20i2389
20
BarnettJ. A.PayneR. W.YarrowD. (1990). Yeasts: characteristics and identification (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (CUP)).
21
BarrsH. (1968). “Determination of water deficits in plant tissues,” in Water Deficits and Plant Growth, vol. 1 . Ed. KozlowskiT. T. (Academ press, London), 235–308.
22
BharathKumarS.PrasanthP.SreenivasM.GouthamiP.SathishG.JnaneshaA. C.et al. (2025). Unveiling the influence of NPK, organic fertilizers, and plant growth enhancers on China aster (Callistephus chinensis L.) cv.’Arka Kamini’seed yield. Ind. Crops Prod.227, 120778. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120778
23
BinsanW.BenjakulS.VisessanguanW.RoytrakulS.TanakaM.KishimuraH. (2008). Antioxidative activity of Mungoong, an extract paste, from the cephalothorax of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Food Chemist.106, 185–193. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.065
24
BlackC.EvansD.EnsmingerL.WhiteJ.ClarkF. (1965). “Chap. 18, water capacity,” in Methods of soil analysis part 1. Ed. KluteA. (Amer. Soc. Agron, Madison, Wisconson, USA).
25
BremnerJ. M.MulvaneyC. (1983). Nitrogen—total. Methods of soil analysis: part 2. Chem. Microbiological Properties9, 595–624.
26
BulgariR.FranzoniG.FerranteA. (2019). Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agron9, 306. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9060306
27
ÇavuşoğluD. (2020). The effects of green tea leaf extract on cytogenetical and physiological parameters of Allium cepa L. exposed to salinity. Sakarya Univ. J. Sci.24, 338–346. doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.541835
28
ChemistsA. A.HorwitzW. (1990). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th ed (Arlington, VA: Washington, AOAC).
29
ChenY.ZhouX.LinY.MaL. (2019). Pumpkin yield affected by soil nutrients and the interactions of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers. HortSci54, 1831–1835. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI14152-19
30
ChojnackaK.WieczorekP. P.SchroederG.MichalakI. (2018). Algae biomass: characteristics and applications Vol. 146 (Switzerland: Springer Inter. Publisher), 9.
31
ChoudharyA.KumarA.KumarU.ChoudharyR.KumarR.JatR.et al. (2022). Various fertilization managements influence the flowering attributes, yield response, biochemical activity and soil nutrient status of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.). Sustainability14, 4561–4583. doi: 10.3390/su14084561
32
ChrysargyrisA.MichailidiE.TzortzakisN. (2018). Physiological and biochemical responses of Lavandula angustifolia to salinity under mineral foliar application. Front. Plant Sci.9, 489. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00489
33
CollaG.HoaglandL.RuzziM.CardarelliM.BoniniP.CanaguierR.et al. (2017). Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: Unraveling their effects on plant physiology and microbiome. Front. Plant Sci.8, 2202. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02202
34
CongrevesK.Van EerdL. (2015). Nitrogen cycling and management in intensive horticultural systems. Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems102, 299–318. doi: 10.1007/s10705-015-9704-7
35
CoolsN.De VosB. (2011). Availability and evaluation of European forest soil monitoring data in the study on the effects of air pollution on forests. IForest-Biogeosciences Forestry4, 205. doi: 10.3832/ifor0588-004
36
CottenieA.VerlooM.KiekensL.VelgheG.CamerlynckR. (1982). Chemical analysis of plants and soils. Lab. Agroch. State Univ. Gent Belgium63, 44–45.
37
CraigieJ. S. (2011). Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. J. Appl. Phycol.23, 371–393. doi: 10.1007/s10811-010-9560-4
38
Du JardinP. (2015). Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Hortic.196, 3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
39
El-AzzonyE.El-MogyE.El-ShaipN. (2018). Response of Jatropha curcas l. shrubs to complete (NPK) fertilizer, bio and organic fertilizers under sandy soil conditions. Sci. J. @ Flowers Ornamental Plants5, 245–259. doi: 10.21608/sjfop.2018.26604
40
El-ShawaG. M.RashwanE. M.AbdelaalK. A. (2020). Mitigating salt stress effects by exogenous application of proline and yeast extract on morpho-physiological, biochemical and anatomical characters of calendula plants. Sci. J. Flowers Ornamental Plants7, 461–482. doi: 10.21608/sjfop.2020.135166
41
Esmaeilzadeh BahabadiS.SharifiM. (2013). Physiologic responses of suspension-cultured Linum album Kotschy ex Boiss. Cell to fungal elicitors. Iranian J. Plant Biol.5, 15–30.
42
EvenhuisB.DewaardP. (1980). Principles and practices in plant analysis. FAO Soils Bull.38, 152–163.
43
FaizahA. F.SantosoJ.SuryandikaF. (2025). Increasing the growth and yield of long bean plants (Vigna sinensis L.) against POC and NPK fertilizers. J. Agron. Tanaman Tropika (Juatika)7, 294–300.
44
FranzoniG.CocettaG.PrinsiB.FerranteA.EspenL. (2022). Biostimulants on crops: Their impact under abiotic stress conditions. Horticul8, 189. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8030189
45
GaalicheB.LadhariA.ZarrelliA.MimounM. B. (2019). Impact of foliar potassium fertilization on biochemical composition and antioxidant activity of fig (Ficus carica L.). Scientia Hortic.253, 111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.024
46
GeeG. W.BauderJ. W. (1986). Particle-size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Phys. Mineralogical Methods5, 383–411.
47
GholamiF.AmerianM. R.AsghariM. R.EbrahimiA. (2023). Assessing the effects of 24-epibrassinolide and yeast extract at various levels on cowpea’s morphophysiological and biochemical responses under water deficit stress. BMC Plant Biol.23, 593. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04548-6
48
GhonameA.DawoodM. G.RiadG.El-TohamyW. (2009). Effect of nitrogen forms and biostimulants foliar application on the growth, yield and chemical composition of hot pepper grown under sandy soil conditions. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci.5, 840–852.
49
GilmanE. F.WatsonD. G. (1993). “Conocarpus erectus, buttonwood,” in Fact Sheet ST-180 (US Forest Service and Southern Group of State Foresters, Gainesville, FL).
50
GüneşA.KordaliŞ.TuranM.BozhüyükA. U. (2019). Determination of antioxidant enzyme activity and phenolic contents of some species of the Asteraceae family from medicanal plants. Ind. Crops Products137, 208–213. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.042
51
HakobyanL.GabrielyanL.TrchounianA. (2012). Yeast extract as an effective nitrogen source stimulating cell growth and enhancing hydrogen photoproduction by Rhodobacter sphaeroides strains from mineral springs. Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy37, 6519–6526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.077
52
HammerschmidtR.NucklesE.KućJ. (1982). Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol. Plant Pathol.20, 73–82. doi: 10.1016/0048-4059(82)90025-X
53
HarborneH. E. (1954). Phytochemical methods. 2nd (Chapman and Hall), 288.
54
HassanA. Y.IbrahimN. S. (2024). Response of Castor (Ricinus Communis l.) yield of seed and oil to the foliar application of green tea extract. Zagazig J. Agric. Res.51, 139–150. doi: 10.21608/zjar.2024.353626
55
HawkesfordM.HorstW.KicheyT.LambersH.SchjoerringJ.MøllerI.et al. (2012). “Functions of macronutrients,” in Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (Elsever, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), 135–189.
56
HerbertD.PhippsP. J.StrangeR. F. (1971). Determination of total carbohydrate, Methods in microbian. Five BP, 209–344.
57
HouQ.YueminN.HuangS.TingZ.JianW.WuzhongN. (2023). Effects of substituting chemical fertilizers with manure on rice yield and soil labile nitrogen in paddy fields of China: A meta-analysis. Pedosphere33, 172–184. doi: 10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.09.003
58
HrólfsdóttirA. Þ.ArasonS.SveinsdóttirH. I.GudjónsdóttirM. (2022). Added value of Ascophyllum nodosum side stream utilization during seaweed meal processing. Mar. Drugs20, 340. doi: 10.3390/md20060340
59
IbrahimM. H.JaafarH. Z.RahmatA.RahmanZ. A. (2012). Involvement of nitrogen on flavonoids, glutathione, anthocyanin, ascorbic acid and antioxidant activities of Malaysian medicinal plant Labisia pumila Blume (Kacip Fatimah). Inte. J. Mol. Sci.13, 393–408. doi: 10.3390/ijms13010393
60
JacksonM. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis,(2nd Indian Print) Vol. 38 (New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd), 336.
61
Jafarlou BahmaniM.PilehvarB.ModarresiM.MohammadiM. (2021). Performance of algae extracts priming for enhancing seed germination indices and salt tolerance in Calotropis procera (Aiton) WT. Iranian J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A: Sci.45, 493–502.
62
JawadR. M.KhalilN. H. (2024). “Role of magnesium spray and soil NPK and potassium silicates application in growth and flowering characteristics in rose plants,” in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Sci (IOP Publishing).
63
JiangK.PengS.YinZ.LiX.XieL.ShenM.et al. (2024). Effects of N, P, K nutrition levels on the growth, flowering attributes and functional components in. Chrysanthemum morifolium. Hortic.10, 226.
64
JokarL.RonaghiA. (2015). Effect of foliar application of different Fe levels and sources on growth and concentration of some nutrients in sorghum. J. Soil Plant Interactions-Isfahan Univ. Technol.6, 163–174.
65
JonesD. L.CrossP.WithersP. J.DeLucaT. H.RobinsonD. A.QuilliamR. S.et al. (2013). Nutrient stripping: the global disparity between food security and soil nutrient stocks. J. Appl. Ecol.50, 851–862. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12089
66
KhanW.RayirathU. P.SubramanianS.JitheshM. N.RayorathP.HodgesD. M.et al. (2008). Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J. Plant Growth Regul.28, 386–399. doi: 10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x
67
KhudairT. Y.HajamA. J. (2021). The effect of yeast extract and organic fertilizer algidex spray on the vegetative, root and floral growth of the Chinese carnation. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol.22, 165–173.
68
KiarostamiK.MohseniR.SabooraA. (2010). Biochemical changes of Rosmarinus officinalis under salt stress. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem.6, 114–122.
69
KularathneM.SrikrishnahS.SutharsanS. (2021). Influence of seaweed (Padina antrillarum) extract foliar application on growth and flowering of roses variety ‘Local’. Inter. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol.9, 235–241. doi: 10.3126/ijasbt.v9i4.36010
70
LiY.WangC.WangT.LiuY.JiaS.GaoY.et al. (2020). Effects of different fertilizer treatments on rhizosphere soil microbiome composition and functions. Land9, 329. doi: 10.3390/land9090329
71
LiuY.HuangG.LvM. (2018). Extraction, characterization and antioxidant activities of mannan from yeast cell wall. Inter. J. Biol. Macromolecules118, 952–956. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.145
72
LiuJ.WangD.YanX.JiaL.ChenN.LiuJ.et al. (2024). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization management on soil properties and leaf traits and yield of. Sapindus mukorossi. Front. Plant Sci.15, 1300683. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1300683
73
LoconsoleD.CristianoG.De LuciaB. (2022). Image analysis of adventitious root quality in wild sage and glossy abelia cuttings after application of different indole-3-butyric acid concentrations. Plants11, 290. doi: 10.3390/plants11030290
74
MalikC.SinghM. (1980). “Determination of total phenols,” in Plant Enzymology and Histo-Enzymology (Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi), 286.
75
MarkwellJ.OstermanJ. C.MitchellJ. L. (1995). Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynthesis Res.46, 467–472. doi: 10.1007/BF00032301
76
Martínez-EspláA.ZapataP. J.CastilloS.GuillénF.Martínez-RomeroD.ValeroD.et al. (2014). Preharvest application of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) in two plum cultivars. 1. Improvement of fruit growth and quality attributes at harvest. Postharvest Biol. Technol.98, 98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.07.011
77
MatterF.Abou-SreeaA. (2016). Influence of application methods of bio-fertilization on vegetative growth, seed yield and chemical composition of Fenugreek plants. Egypt. J. Hortic.43, 19–33. doi: 10.21608/ejoh.2016.2822
78
MeiX.TangQ.HuangG.LongR.HuangH. (2019). Preparation, structural analysis and antioxidant activities of phosphorylated (1→ 3)-β-d-glucan. Food Chem. 309125791.
79
MichalakI.ChojnackaK. (2014). Algal extracts: Technology and advances. Engin. Life Sci.14, 581–591. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201400139
80
MohamedM. H.Sami R.Al-MushhinA. A.AliM. M. E.El-DesoukyH. S.IsmailK. A.et al. (2021). Impacts of effective microorganisms, compost tea, fulvic acid, yeast extract, and foliar spray with seaweed extract on sweet pepper plants under greenhouse conditions. Plants10, 1927. doi: 10.3390/plants10091927
81
MosaW. F.Sas-PasztL.GornikK.AliH. M.SalemM. Z. (2021). Vegetative growth, yield, and fruit quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. maamoura as affected by some biostimulants. Bioresources16, 7379.
82
MoustafaH. E. B. (2020). Response of Aralia plants to foliar spray with green tea extract. World Rural Observations12, 97–103.
83
MurphyJ.RileyJ. P. (1962). Amodified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta27, 31–36. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
84
NagleD. G.FerreiraD.ZhouY.-D. (2006). Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG): chemical and biomedical perspectives. Phytochem67, 1849–1855. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.06.020
85
NagodowithanaW. (1991). Yeast technology universal foods corporation Vol. 273 (New York: Published by Van Nostrils Reinhold). Milwaukee. Wisconsin.
86
NelsonG. (1996). The shrubs and woody vines of Florida: a reference and field guide. Pineapple Press Inc.
87
NelsonD. W.SommersL. E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods Soil analysis: Part 3 Chem. Methods5, 961–1010.
88
NemadodziL. E.ArayaH.NkomoM.NgezimanaW.MudauN. F. (2017). Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium effects on the physiology and biomass yield of baby spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). J. Plant Nutri.40, 2033–2044. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1346121
89
NiuJ.LiuC.HuangM.LiuK.YanD. (2021). Effects of foliar fertilization: a review of current status and future perspectives. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutri.21, 104–118. doi: 10.1007/s42729-020-00346-3
90
NofalE.El-MahroukM.El-SayedB.RadwanA. (2021). Effect of NPK fertilizer and some natural extract treatments on the chemical composition of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L. var. Dwarf Chrysanthemum). Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res.19, 3153–3165. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1904_31533165
91
OlsenS.SommersL. (1982). Phosphorus. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chem. Microbiol. Properties. Agron. Monograph2, 421–422.
92
PastorizaS.MesíasM.CabreraC.Rufián-HenaresJ. A. (2017). Healthy properties of green and white teas: an update. Food Funct.8, 2650–2662. doi: 10.1039/C7FO00611J
93
PetropoulosS. A. (2020). Practical applications of plant biostimulants in greenhouse vegetable crop production. Agron10, 1569. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10101569
94
PoppM.SmithJ.LüttgeU.CramW.DiazW.GriffithsH.et al. (1989). Ecophysiology of xerophytic and halophytic vegetation of a coastal alluvial plain in northern Venezuela: VI. Water relations and gas exchange of mangroves. New Phytol.111, 293–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb00693.x
95
PrasadK.DasA. K.OzaM. D.BrahmbhattH.SiddhantaA. K.MeenaR.et al. (2010). Detection and quantification of some plant growth regulators in a seaweed-based foliar spray employing a mass spectrometric technique sans chromatographic separation. J. Agricul. Food Chem.58, 4594–4601. doi: 10.1021/jf904500e
96
RadwanA. M.AhmedE. A.DoniaA. M.MustafaA. M.BalahM. A. (2023). Priming of Citrullus lanatus var. Colocynthoides seeds in seaweed extract improved seed germination, plant growth and performance under salinity conditions. Scient. Rep.13, 11884.
97
RadyM.SadakM. S.El-BassiounyH.El-MonemA. (2011). Alleviation the adverse effects of salinity stress in sunflower cultivars using nicotinamide and α-tocopherol. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci.5, 342–3555.
98
RanaV. S.SharmaV.SharmaS.RanaN.KumarV.SharmaU.et al. (2023). Seaweed extract as a biostimulant agent to enhance the fruit growth, yield, and quality of kiwifruit. Hortic9, 432. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9040432
99
RautioP.FürstA.StefanK.RaitioH.BartelsU. (2010). “Sampling and Analysis of Needles and Leaves,” in Part XII. Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests (UNECE, ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre, Hamburg), 1–19.
100
ReddyC. A.SaravananR. S. (2013). Polymicrobial multi-functional approach for enhancement of crop productivity. Adv. Appl. Microbiol.82, 53–113. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407679-2.00003-X
101
RenN.WangY.YeY.ZhaoY.HuangY.FuW.et al. (2020). Effects of continuous nitrogen fertilizer application on the diversity and composition of rhizosphere soil bacteria. Front. Microbiol.11, 1948. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01948
102
RokayyaS.KhojahE. (2016). Physical-mechanical estimation of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruit varieties. J. Northeast Agric. Univ. (English Edition)23, 61–69.
103
SachdevS.AnsariS. A.AnsariM. I.FujitaM.HasanuzzamanM. (2021). Abiotic stress and reactive oxygen species: Generation, signaling, and defense mechanisms. Antioxidants10, 277. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020277
104
SayedA. H.ZewailR.AbdalrahmanH.FekryG. E. A.KhaitovB.ParkK. W. (2019). Promotion of growth, yield and fiber quality attributes of Egyptian cotton by bacillus strains in combination with mineral fertilizers. J. Plant Nutrit.42, 2337–2348. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2019.1655045
105
SharmaH. S.FlemingC.SelbyC.RaoJ.MartinT. (2014). Plant biostimulants: a review on the processing of macroalgae and use of extracts for crop management to reduce abiotic and biotic stresses. J. Appl. Phycol.26, 465–490. doi: 10.1007/s10811-013-0101-9
106
ShiL.ZhengW.LeiT.LiuT.HuiM. (2021). The effect of different soil amendments on soil properties and on the morphological and physiological characteristics of Chinese cabbage. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutri.21, 1500–1510. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00456-6
107
SidiM.OmarD.NahrawiH.EliasH.WasliH. (2022). “Effect of NPK and silicon fertilizer on growth, flowering, and nectar of Turnera ulmifolia L,” in IOP Conf. Series. Earth and Environ. Sci. (IOP Publishing), 1053.
108
SingletonV. L.OrthoferR.Lamuela-RaventósR. M. (1999). Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymology299, 152–178. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1
109
SnedecorG. W.CochranW. G. (1989). Statistical methods. Agric. Sci.115, 153–153.
110
StefanelliD.WinklerS.JonesR. (2011). Reduced nitrogen availability during growth improves quality in red oak lettuce leaves by minimizing nitrate content, and increasing antioxidant capacity and leaf mineral content. Agric. Sci.2, 477–486. doi: 10.4236/as.2011.24061
111
StirkW. A.RengasamyK. R.KulkarniM. G.van StadenJ. (2020). Plant biostimulants from seaweed: An overview. Chem. Biol. Plant biostimulants, 31–55.
112
TangQ.HuangG.ZhaoF.ZhouL.HuangS.LiH. (2017). The antioxidant activities of six (1→ 3)-β-d-glucan derivatives prepared from yeast cell wall. Inter. J. Biol. Macromolecules98, 216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.132
113
TejaP. R.BhaskarV. V.SubbaramammaP. (2017). Influence of graded levels of nitrogen and potassium combinations on the flower yield of annual chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum coronarium L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci.6, 1124–1134. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.136
114
TosunM.ErcisliS.SengulM.OzerH.PolatT.OzturkE. (2009). Antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of eight Salvia species from Turkey. Biol. Res.42, 175–181. doi: 10.4067/S0716-97602009000200005
115
uz ZamanQ.GuoL.HeX.LuoY.LiuC.MurtazaG.et al. (2025). Synergistic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, biochar and seaweed extract for improving the copper tolerance in hemp. Ind. Crops Prod224, 120358. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.120358
116
VanlauweB.BationoA.ChianuJ.GillerK. E.MerckxR.MokwunyeU.et al. (2010). Integrated soil fertility management: operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outlook Agric.39, 17–24. doi: 10.5367/000000010791169998
117
VasundharaD.ChhabraV. (2021). Foliar nutrition in cereals: A review. Pharma Innov. J.10, 1247–1254.
118
WanL.-J.TianY.HeM.ZhengY.-Q.LyuQ.XieR.-J.et al. (2021). Effects of chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer application on soil properties, citrus growth physiology, and yield. Agric11, 1207. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11121207
119
WangY.XiangL.WangS.WangX.ChenX.MaoZ. (2016). Effects of seaweed fertilizer on the Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings growth and soil microbial numbers under continue cropping. Acta Ecol. Sin.37, 180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2017.01.004
120
XingG.MaJ.LiuX.LeiB.WangG.HouS. (2023). Influence of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizer ratios on the agronomic and quality traits of foxtail millet. Agron13, 2005. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13082005
121
YangZ.-J.WuX.-H.GrossnickleS. C.ChenL.-H.YuX.-X.El-KassabyY. A.et al. (2020). Formula fertilization promotes Phoebe bournei robust seedling cultivation. Forests11, 781. doi: 10.3390/f11070781
122
YeC. L.HuW. L.DaiD. H. (2011). Extraction of polysaccharides and the antioxidant activity from the seeds of Plantago asiatica L. Inter. J. Biol. Macromolecules49, 466–470. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.05.026
123
ZhangX.LiS.AnX.SongZ.ZhuY.TanY.et al. (2023). Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium formula fertilization on the yield and berry quality of blueberry. PloS One18, e0283137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283137
124
ZhangS.LuJ.ZhuY.FangY.CongR.LiX.et al. (2022). Rapeseed as a previous crop reduces rice N fertilizer input by improving soil fertility. Field Crops Res.281, 108487. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108487
125
ZhangM.SunD.NiuZ.YanJ.ZhouX.KangX. (2020). Effects of combined organic/inorganic fertilizer application on growth, photosynthetic characteristics, yield and fruit quality of Actinidia chinesis cv ‘Hongyang’. Global Ecol. Conserv.22, e00997. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00997
Summary
Keywords
Conocarpus erectus, chemical fertilizer, yeast, seaweeds, green tea
Citation
El-Mahrouk E-SM, Mahmoud HG, Abdelaal K, Ebrahim HMA, El-Tarawy AM, Alsakkaf WAA, Ahmed T and Ali HM (2025) Growth, chemical, and biochemical composition of Conocarpus erectus L. in response to NPK fertilizers and extracts of active dry yeast, seaweeds, and green tea. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1616150. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1616150
Received
21 May 2025
Accepted
18 August 2025
Published
12 September 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
María Serrano, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Spain
Reviewed by
Yog Raj, Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR), India
Lukhi Mulia S., State Polytechnic of Malang, Indonesia
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 El-Mahrouk, Mahmoud, Abdelaal, Ebrahim, El-Tarawy, Alsakkaf, Ahmed and Ali.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: El-Sayed Mohamed El-Mahrouk, elsayedelmahrouk@gmail.com; Hayssam M. Ali, hayssam@ksu.edu.sa
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.