ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Crop and Product Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1618171

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancements in Light Management Strategies for Crop ProductivityView all 4 articles

Dose-response of tomato fruit yield to far-red fraction in supplementary lighting

Provisionally accepted
Elena  VincenziElena Vincenzi1Aron  MoehnAron Moehn1Emmanouil  KatsadasEmmanouil Katsadas1Sana  KarborSana Karbor1Esther  de BeerEsther de Beer2Frank  MillenaarFrank Millenaar3Leo  F. M. MarcelisLeo F. M. Marcelis1Ep  HeuvelinkEp Heuvelink1*
  • 1Horticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • 2Signify Netherlands B.V., Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • 3BASF – Nunhems, Nunhem, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Supplementary LED lighting in greenhouse horticulture is typically rich in red light (R, 600 – 700 nm) while it lacks far-red light (FR, 700 - 800 nm), resulting in growing conditions with lower-than-solar far-red fractions (< 0.46; FR / (R + FR)). In these light environments, the addition of FR can improve tomato harvest index and fruit yield (ripe fruit fresh weight). While fruit yield increases linearly with the dose of FR at low FR fractions (0.1 - 0.28), it is unknown whether this relationship holds at higher FR levels, up to and above solar FR fractions. In this study, we quantified the relationship between tomato fruit yield and the FR fraction in supplementary lighting. Two cluster tomato cultivars ‘Foundation’ and ‘Trevine’ were grown in two greenhouse compartments for 20 weeks during the winter season (September to February). Different fractions of supplementary FR (0.22 to 0.49) were applied, while maintaining a constant supplementary photosynthetic photon flux density of 250 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹ and 16-hour photoperiod. A yield component analysis was used to identify the key physiological drivers of the FR effect on yield. Additionally, fruit quality at harvest (total soluble solids, soluble sugars and pH) and shelf-life were assessed. Additional FR increased fruit yield up to a FR fraction of 0.40, where the highest effect was recorded (+16% fruit yield for both cultivars). Fruit yield increases under additional FR were mostly associated with increased plant dry weight, with a small yet significant increase in the fraction of dry matter partitioned to the fruits. Radiation use efficiency (g fruit fresh weight mol⁻¹) and electricity use efficiency of supplementary lighting (g fruit fresh weight kWh⁻¹) decreased at higher FR fractions (0.44 and 0.49). Finally, additional FR had a minimal effect on fruit quality and shelf-life. We conclude that adding FR to supplementary lighting can increase tomato fruit yield linearly up to a FR fraction of 0.40, while at higher FR fractions, further increases in FR have limited or even negative effects on yield and decrease radiation and electricity use efficiency.

Keywords: Tomato, Far-red light, radiation use efficiency, electricity use efficiency, fruit quality, Vertical light distribution, Photosynthesis, Yield component analysis

Received: 25 Apr 2025; Accepted: 16 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Vincenzi, Moehn, Katsadas, Karbor, de Beer, Millenaar, Marcelis and Heuvelink. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ep Heuvelink, Horticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.