ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Crop and Product Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1619269

This article is part of the Research TopicElucidating the Molecular, Physiological, and Biochemical Mechanisms Underlying Stress Responses in Crop PlantsView all 16 articles

Impact of Layered Controlled Release Urea on Wheat Growth, Grain Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation in Northern Huanghuai Plain, China

Provisionally accepted
Muhammad  AkhtarMuhammad Akhtar1*Wu  LiugeWu Liuge1Chen  JianChen Jian1Su  YuxiaoSu Yuxiao2Zheng  YuntanZheng Yuntan2Lu  YulunLu Yulun2Zheng  ShanchaoZheng Shanchao2Deng  AixingDeng Aixing1Song  ZhenweiSong Zhenwei1Zheng  ChengyanZheng Chengyan1*Zhang  WeijianZhang Weijian1*
  • 1Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Institute of Crop Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China
  • 2Dongping County Agricultural Bureau, Dongping County, 271500, China, Dongping County, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Nitrogen (N) fertilization plays a pivotal role in optimizing wheat growth and grain yield; however, suboptimal application strategies often result in inefficient nitrogen use, adversely affecting crop development and dry matter accumulation (DMA). Addressing the urgent need to enhance nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in sustainable agricultural systems, this study evaluates the effects of layered applications of controlled-release urea (CRU) on wheat growth, grain yield, and DMA over a threeyear field trial conducted from 2021-2024. Five nitrogen treatments were compared: a control with zero N fertilizer (CK), one-time basal application of normal urea at a depth of 8-10 cm (NU 1layer), one-time basal application of controlled release urea (CRU) at a depth of 8-10 cm (CU 1layer), one-time basal application of normal urea at soil layers of 8-10 cm and 18-20 cm (NU 2layer), and one-time basal application of CRU at soil layers of 8-10 cm and 18-20 cm (CU 2-layer).The results over the three-year period indicated that the CU 2-layer treatment significantly enhanced CGR during critical growth phases, including jointing-anthesis (39.94% and 29.72%) and anthesis-maturity (10.78% and 16.05%), leading to increased wheat grain yields (9.29% and 14.73%) compared to CU 1-layer and NU 2-layer treatments, respectively. Furthermore, NUE and protein content were markedly higher in the CU 2-layer treatment. Analysis of yield components revealed that the increased grain yields associated with CU 2-layer application were primarily due to enhanced 500-grain weight and improved productive spike numbers per square meter, which resulted from a sustainable N supply. Additionally, findings from pre-anthesis and post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and translocation were essential for achieving high grain yields with CU 2-layer. The CU 2-layer treatment maintained higher SPAD values for the flag leaf and photosynthesis rates during the anthesis and early grain filling stages. Overall, the CU 2-layer application effectively optimized agronomic and physiological processes, contributing to improved wheat production and highlighting its potential for sustainable agricultural practices.

Keywords: Controlled release urea, Layered application, Crop growth rate, Dry matter accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency, grain yield, protein content

Received: 27 Apr 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Akhtar, Liuge, Jian, Yuxiao, Yuntan, Yulun, Shanchao, Aixing, Zhenwei, Chengyan and Weijian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Muhammad Akhtar, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Institute of Crop Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China
Zheng Chengyan, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Institute of Crop Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China
Zhang Weijian, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Institute of Crop Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.