MINI REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci., 27 June 2025

Sec. Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1625830

Lipid droplets in plants: turnover and stress responses

  • State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, National Key Laboratory for the Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China

Abstract

Lipid droplets (LDs) have emerged as dynamic organelles central to plant lipid metabolism, stress adaptation, and energy homeostasis. This review synthesizes recent advances in understanding LD biogenesis and degradation in plants, highlighting conserved and divergent mechanisms relative to other eukaryotes. LD formation originates in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where neutral lipids synthesized by diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGAT) and phospholipid: diacylglycerol acyltransferases (PDAT) accumulate into lens-like structures. These structures bud into the cytosol via ER machinery, including SEIPIN complexes, vesicle-associated membrane proteins, and LD-associated protein-interacting protein which regulate LD size and abundance. Degradation occurs through two major pathways: lipolysis, mainly mediated by the patatin-like lipase SUGAR-DEPENDENT1, and lipophagy, where AUTOPHAGY-RELATED proteins deliver LDs for breakdown. LDs also function as stress-responsive hubs, accumulating under abiotic stresses and during pathogen interactions, where they participate in membrane remodeling and antimicrobial defense. Extensive studies in major oilseed crops reveal that expressions of multiple genes involved in LD turnover are significantly induced under various abiotic stresses and phytohormone treatments. These genetic components operate autonomously or synergistically (e.g. DGAT and PDAT) within the TAG biosynthesis and LD metabolic pathways, effecting concurrent enhancements in stress resilience and oil production under suboptimal growth conditions. Critical knowledge gaps persist, including the interplay between lipolysis and lipophagy, the integration of energy-related signaling pathways in LD turnover, and stress-modulated post-translational control of LD proteome. Deciphering these mechanisms will advance our understanding towards LD biology.

1 Introduction

Since their identification as organelles in the 19th century, lipid droplets (LDs) have undergone various nomenclature changes. They were once referred to as lipid bodies, adiposomes, oil bodies, sphaerosomes and oleosomes, but are now commonly known as LDs (). LDs are lipid-rich organelles, which possess a core of neutral lipids, predominantly triacylglycerols (TAGs) and steryl/wax esters, which is encased by a monolayer of phospholipids (PLs).

LDs are derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and the biogenesis of LDs includes the following key steps: neutral lipid synthesis at the ER; formation of a lipid lens; budding of LDs; LD growth and maturation (). In the last decade, proteins involved in these steps have been well characterized in plants, especially model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. These proteins include TAG-synthesizing enzymes and the proteins responsible for the LDs generation, such as SEIPIN, VESICLE-ASSOCIATED MEMBRANE PROTEIN-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 27 (VAP27) and LD-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN-INTERACTING PROTEIN (LDIP) (; ). The degradation of LDs in plants is also a tightly regulated process, mainly mediated by lipolysis and lipophagy. Among the key players in lipolysis, a conserved patatin domain containing protein SUGAR-DEPENDENT1 (SDP1) stands out (; ). In A. thaliana leaves, lipophagy occurs through microautophagy, relying on the core components of the macroautophagy pathway ().

The role of LDs in carbon reserve storage is fundamental to the survival and growth of plants. However, over the past decade, a paradigm shift has occurred in the perception of LDs in plant biology. Except acting as static storage organelles, LDs are now recognized as dynamic subcellular structures actively involved in multiple physiological processes. Mounting evidence has shown that LDs play a crucial role in stress adaptation. Under abiotic stress conditions such as drought, cold, and heat stress, the abundance of LDs increases in plant cells (Yang et al., 2011; ; ; Yang et al., 2024). This new understanding has highlighted the importance of lipid metabolism, lipid transport, and stress responses in plants.

Given the significance of LDs in plant physiology, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the latest research advancements in the biogenesis and degradation of LDs in plants. It will also explore the importance of LDs in the stress response of plants. By integrating findings from recent studies, we hope to shed light on the complex molecular and physiological processes associated with LDs in plants, which may have implications for crop improvement, bioenergy production, and understanding plant responses to environmental changes.

2 The proteins involved in the generation of lipid droplets

LD biogenesis in plant cells shares conserved mechanisms with other eukaryotes, relying on ER-localized protein machinery to initiate LD formation and on LD surface proteins to ensure proper cytoplasmic packaging. The process begins with the synthesis of neutral lipids within the ER, where they accumulate into lens-like structures between the ER membrane leaflets (). Key proteins, such as SEIPIN and VAP27, facilitate the budding of nascent LDs into the cytoplasm (). During this step, the phospholipid monolayer of the LD becomes continuous with the outer ER membrane leaflet. Subsequently, additional proteins, including lipins and LD coat proteins, are recruited to promote LD growth. However, the mechanism underlying LD dissociation from the ER remains poorly understood ().

2.1 Enzymes for neutral lipids synthesis

In plants, the ER serves as the principal site for TAG biosynthesis, which is mainly accomplished through the glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) pathway or the Kennedy pathway (Xu and Shanklin, 2016). Firstly, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) catalyzes the combination of G3P and Acyl-CoA, resulting in the formation of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA). Subsequently, under the catalytic action of lysophosphatidic acid phosphatase (LDPAT), LPA combines with Acyl-CoA once more to produce phosphatidic acid (PA). Phosphatidic acid phosphatase (PAP) then dephosphorylates PA to generate diacylglycerol (DAG). Finally, DAG undergoes final acylation to form TAG through two distinct mechanisms. The Acyl-CoA-dependent pathway, catalyzed by diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGATs), utilizes Acyl-CoA as the acyl donor (). Alternatively, phospholipid: diacylglycerol acyltransferase (PDAT) drives an Acyl-CoA-independent route by transferring an acyl moiety from phosphatidylcholines (PC) to DAG, producing TAG alongside a lysophospholipid (). Thereafter, TAGs are subsequently stored between the two leaflets of the ER. As TAG accumulates and LDs enlarge, they separate from the ER membrane and enter the cytoplasm (Figure 1, Table 1).

Figure 1

; ; ; ). Plastids supply FAs that are transported to the cytosol and activated into Acyl-CoA. In the endoplasmic reticulum, G3P is acylated to form LPA using Acyl-CoA. LPA is further acylated by LPAT to produce PA. PAP dephosphorylates PA to DAG, which can be acylated by DGAT to form TAG. DAG can also exchange with PC, which are generated through an acyl editing cycle involving reacylation and acylation. LDs store TAG and are covered by a single layer of phospholipids and LD-associated proteins. The budding of LDs from the ER is regulated by the SEIPIN protein complex (including SEIPIN1, SEIPIN2, and SEIPIN3), which acts as an ER-localized scaffold protein to ensure proper LD formation by controlling neutral lipid synthesis and droplet size. Additionally, VAP27–1 functions as an ER-LD contact site protein, mediating phospholipid transfer to promote LD maturation and stabilize the LD formation complex. As LDs mature, they recruit proteins such as LDAP and LDIP, OLEOSIN, CALEOSIN, and STEROLEOSIN, which contribute to LD structure, stability, and function. During lipolysis, the ESCRT component FREE1 directly interacts with both PEX11e and SDP1, thereby regulating SDP1-mediated LD degradation and promoting FAs release. And these FAs are transported into peroxisome by PXA1 for β-oxidation. In contrast, lipophagy involves the selective autophagy of LDs, delivering them to vacuoles for breakdown. FAs, fatty acids; G3P, glycerol-3-phosphate; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; LPAT, lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase; PA, phosphatidic acid; PAP, Phosphatidic acid phosphatase; DAG, diacylglycerol; DGAT, acylated by diacylglycerol acyltransferase; PC, phosphatidylcholines; LDs, lipid droplets; TAG, triacylglycerol; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; VAP27-1, VESICLE-ASSOCIATED MEMBRANE PROTEIN-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 27-1; LDAP, LIPID DROPLET-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; LDIP, LDAP-INTERACTING PROTEIN; ESCRT, ENDOSOMAL SORTING COMPLEX REQUIRED FOR TRANSPORT; FREE1, FYVE DOMAIN PROTEIN REQUIRED FOR ENDOSOMAL SORTING 1; PEX11e, PEROXIN 11e; SDP1, SUGAR DEPENDENT 1; PXA1, PEROXISOMAL ABC TRANSPORTER 1.

Table 1

PathwayGene types(molecular function)SpeciesGene namesGrowth and development related functionsStress-response-related functionsReferences
TAG SynthesisGPATs (catalyze the combination of G3P and Acyl-CoA, resulting in the formation of LPA)A. thalianaAtGPAT4/8Involved in cuticle development through regulating lipid homeostasisMediate plant immune responses through pathogen-induced dynamic relocation of LDs
DGATs (catalyze DAG acylation with Acyl- CoA to synthesize TAG)A. thalianaAtDGAT1/2dgat1-1 and dgat1-1 dgat2 lines exhibit reduced seed oil contentStabilize plasma membrane integrity and enhance thermotoleranceZhang et al., 2009; , ;
G. maxGmDGAT1-2Significantly increases seed oil content and oleic acid (18:1) accumulation during TAG biosynthesis; ; Xu et al., 2021
Jatropha curcasJcDGAT1/2Enhance seed oil accumulation while reducing protein and soluble sugarcontentZhang et al., 2021
Plukenetia volubilis L.PvDGAT2-2Catalyzes TAG biosynthesis in leavesConfers thermotolerance through MYB1-dependent lipid remodeling in plantsYang et al., 2024
PDATs (transfer an acyl moiety from PC to DAG, producing TAG)A. thalianaAtPDAT1Delays plant senescence by regulating fatty acid turnover, membrane lipid homeostasis and TAG synthesisEnhances tolerance to temperature stress; ;
LD SynthesisVAP27 (interacts with the N terminus of SEIPIN2 and/or SEIPIN3 to stabilize the LD- forming complex)A. thalianaAtVAP27-1vap27-1 mutants reveal a large LD phenotype in seedsEnhances ER stress resistance by modulating ER-PM contact sites and calcium homeostasis; ;
Z. maysZmVAP27-1Supports cellular expansion and normal growth processes by regulating aquaporin activityMaintains water homeostasis and minimizes ionic imbalance, enhancing salinity tolerance
Populus tremula ×tremuloidesPttVAP27-17Improves carbon allocation and energy storage; Promotes plant growth and developmentMediates stress-responsive energy mobilization to sustain plant survival
SEIPINs (interact with LDIP to modulate the number and size of LDs, facilitating LD biogenesis)A. thalianaAtSEIPIN1/2/3Expression of SEIPIN1 promotes accumulation of large-sized LDs, while expression of SEIPIN2 and SEIPIN3 promote small LDs
ThlaspiarvenseTaSEIPIN1/2/3Involved in the YELLOW and MATURE late seed maturation stages
LDAPs (LD coat protein, regulate LD compartmentation)A. thalianaAtLDAP1/2/3Formation and expansion of LDs in leavesLDAP1 regulate LD dynamics in response to heat stress; LDAP3 is involved in cold tolerance
Z. maysZmLDAP1/2Regulates LD clusteringParticipates in plant antiviral defense by regulating C18 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) biosynthesis
Populus trichocarpaPtLDAP1/2/3Promote lipid body expansion through binding to the expanding monolayer
LDIP (interacts with LDAPs and SEIPINs topromote LD formation)A. thalianaAtLDIPRegulates LD compartmentation inseeds, seedlings and leaves
T. arvenseTaLDIPTaldip mutants exhibite increased seed oil content without compromising plant growth
LDPS (Interacts with OLE1 to regulate fusion)A. thalianaAtLDPSPromotes LD expansion and maintains seed oil content
OLEOSINs (regulate LD size)A. thalianaAtOLE1Maintains LD size homeostasis in pollen and seedsAdaptive modification of LDs for freezing tolerance; ;
P.trichocarpaPtOLE6Involved in LD production, enlargement
G. maxGmOLE1Stabilizes oil body structure to inhibit lipid release; Enhances seed development;
CaryacathayensisCcOLE2Mediates embryonic maturation processes
CALEOSIN (mediates overlapping functions in oil accumulation)A. thalianaAtCLO1/2Mediate lipophagy to regulate LD catabolism and acyl remodeling in germinating seedsFacilitates antimicrobial compound production to enhance biotic stress resistance; ;
G. maxGmCLO1Potentially affects soybean reproductive developmentKnockout GmCLO1 elevates pest resistance, where as over expression lines compromisesdefense
O. sativaOsCLO5RNAi lines of OsClo5 have higher survival than WT seedlingsRegulates plant cold resistance through inhibition of JAsignalling and synthesisZeng et al., 2022
Steroleosin/HSD (is involved in the brassinosteroids-related pathway)A. thalianaAtHSD1Involved in BRs biosynthesis and degradation in seeds and seedlingsRegulates stress responses via hormone signaling
C.cathayensisCcHSD5Promotes embryonic development
Pinus massonianaPmHSD-A/BStabilize oil body structures via its sterol-binding domain and exhibits sterol-coupled dehydrogenase activity
O. sativaOsHSD1Modulates wax metabolism; Regulates plant height and leaf cuticle developmentIs induced by salt and cold stress, potentially mediating abiotic stress responses
LD DegradationSDP1 (catalyzes the hydrolysis of TAG inLDs)A. thalianaAtSDP1sdp1 mutants exhibit apostgerminative growth arrestphenotype, which can be rescued by providing sugarDisruption of SDP1 enhances plant tolerance to darkness;
G. maxGmSDP1Negatively regulates seed oil content and fatty acid compositionEnhances drought resistance by regulating stress-induced TAG hydrolysis in cotyledons; ;
Brassicanapus L.BnSDP1RNAi lines show enhanced seed oilyield without compromising vigor
J. curcasJcSDP1Gene silencing of JcSDP1 enhances seed oil accumulation in seeds
PUX10 (collaborates with CDC48 to facilitate the degradation of ubiquitinated proteins)A. thalianaAtPUX10Drives seed germinationParticipates in stress-responsive transient metabolic regulation via phase-separated condensate formation;
C.cathayensisCcPUX10Promotes seed developmentModulates LD biogenesis and stability
OBL1 (a TAG lipase associated with LDs)A. thalianaAtOBL1Facilitates rapid pollen tube growthMaintains cellular homeostasis by preventing free FAs toxicity
Nicotiana benthamianaNtOBL1Hydrolyzes LD-stored TAGs to supply membrane lipids; Mediates pollen tube growthBypasses β-oxidation by directly channeling FAs to the ER for hypoxic adaptation
Avena sativa LAsOBL1-likeAffects vegetative morphogenesisOrchestrates stress-responsive lipid metabolism for flag leaf adaptation
ATG (regulates autophagosome biogenesis and autophagy)A. thalianaAtATG5/7Promotes nitrogen remobilization; Boosts autophagy-driven nutrient recyclingDelays leaf senescence, maintains adaptability under nutrient and drought stresses;
N.benthamian aNbATG5/7/8Maintains normal development and suppresses leaf malformationDegrades viral silencing suppressors, boosting antiviral defense;
Populusalba × Populus glandulosaPagATG18Promotes xylem lignificationPagATG18 overexpress linesenhance salt tolerance and reduces oxidative membrane;
Yu et al., 2023
O. sativaOsATG5/7Deficiency of ATG5/7 and related genes compromise pollen fertility, impairing reproductive developmentATG8 overexpress lines enhance drought tolerance via autophagy-mediated resource recycling;
Z. maysZmATG6/8a/10Facilitates remobilization of N/K/Zn to leavesPromotes salt tolerance through enhanced autophagy;
Triticum aestivumTaATG8Autophagy deficiency induces premature floret abortion, severely impairing reproductive growthEnhances stress resilience by coordinating autophagy, iron homeostasis, and defense signaling; Yue et al., 2022
PXA1 (transports FAs into peroxisomes for β-oxidation)A. thalianaAtPXA1pxa1 mutant fails to germinate onsucrose-free medium; Extended dark conditions are lethal for pxa1 plantspxa1-2 and pxa1-3 mutants exhibit enhanced salt tolerance due to reduced ROS accumulation; ; Yu et al., 2019
CDC48 (facilitates the unfolding and removal of membrane proteins)A. thalianaAtCDC48cdc48 mutant impairs oleosin degradation, delaying post- germinative growth
CGI-58 (interacts with PXA1 to coregulate lipid homeostasis and signaling)A. thalianaAtCGI58Interacts with PXA1 to coregulate lipid metabolism and signaling, particularly in nonseed vegetative tissues

Functionally characterized genes involved in LD turnover in plants.

Plants possess multiple DGAT isoform, including the ER-localized DGAT1 and DGAT2, as well as a soluble DGAT3 whose physiological role remains under investigation (). In A. thaliana, PDAT contains two homologs, and PDAT1 is the dominant isoform in TAG biosynthesis (). Distinct expression patterns and functional specializations among TAG-synthesizing enzymes enable plants to adjust lipid metabolism according to developmental and environmental cues. In different plant species, such as A. thaliana, Camelina sativa and soybean, DGAT1 is the most highly expressed TAG biosynthetic enzyme (). Loss of AtDGAT1 activity in the A. thaliana dgat1–1 mutant leads to a reduction in seed oil content by at least 20% (; ), while the dgat1–1 dgat2 double mutant does not display more oil reduction than dgat1–1 mutant (Zhang et al., 2009). As for PDAT genes, either oil content or FA composition is affected by the Atpdat1 mutation. The AtDGAT1 mutation causes the up-regulated expression of AtPDAT1, and the dgat1–1 pdat1–1 double mutant is lethal, indicating DGAT1 and PDAT1 have overlapping functions in A. thaliana TAG biosynthesis. The suppression of AtPDAT1 expression by RNAi interference in the dgat1–1 genetic background reduces oil accumulation by 70% to 80%, suggesting that PDAT1 rather than DGAT2 supports TAG biosynthesis when DGAT1 is lacking (Zhang et al., 2009). Furthermore, the detailed role of DGAT2, DGAT3 and PDAT2 in seed oil biosynthesis is unclear ().

In addition to TAGs, other forms of nonpolar lipids may also be present in LDs of some specific plant species. Wax esters (WEs), which are neutral lipids composed of a fatty alcohol esterified to a fatty acid. The WEs are synthesized through two enzymatic reactions catalyzed by fatty Acyl-CoA reductase and wax synthase. In jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis), a small shrub native to the deserts of North America, WEs can accumulate up to 60% of the seed weight (). Some algae, mosses, and pollen grains may also accumulate wax esters in LDs, though typically in smaller amounts ().

2.2 Lipid droplet proteins

Following their synthesis, neutral lipids — primarily TAGs — begin to accumulate between the leaflets of the ER membrane, forming small lens-like structures. These nascent lipid globules gradually expand through localized lipid synthesis and incorporation of additional neutral lipids. As these globules undergo expansion, they undergo a process of budding towards the cytosol, eventually maturing into discrete LDs (Figure 1, Table 1). This process of budding and stabilization is contingent on the recruitment of LD proteins. LD proteins are classified into two groups based on the pathways that they employ to traffic to LDs: class I LD proteins and class II LD proteins. Class I LD proteins are composed of proteins that are co-translationally inserted into the cytoplasmic face of the ER bilayer; in contrast, class II LD proteins target the LD from the cytoplasm ().

2.2.1 OLEOSIN, CALEOSIN and STEREOLESIN

The presence of OLEOSIN proteins on the phospholipid layer of LDs plays a crucial role in LD formation and its functional regulations (). The prevailing LD proteins identified in the seeds of plants are OLEOSIN, CALEOSIN, and STEREOLESIN (). In A. thaliana, there are a total of 16 OLEOSIN genes, which include five seed-type OLEOSIN genes. Among these, OLE1 is the most abundant OLEOSIN in A. thaliana seeds, followed by OLE2. OLEOSINs play a crucial role in preventing oil body fusion, thus maintaining the structural integrity of oil bodies. The OLEOSIN content is critical for oil body size regulation; a reduction in OLEOSIN content leads to an increase in oil body diameter due to the steric hindrance of OLEOSINs on the oil body surface inhibiting oil body fusion. Seeds of OLEOSIN single mutants (ole1 and ole2) contain larger oil bodies than those of the wild type, and seeds of an OLEOSIN double mutant (ole1 ole2) contain even larger oil bodies than those of ole1 and ole2 single mutants. This suggests that OLEOSINs are essential for normal germination and enhance plant survival during winter by inhibiting freezing stress-induced oil body fusion (). Recent studies have identified a low-abundance, seed-specific LD protein termed LIPID DROPLET PROTEIN OF SEEDS (LDPS), which contains an amphipathic α-helix and a proline hairpin motif that serve as LD targeting signals. A distinct domain of LDPS mediates its interaction with OLE1. ldps mutant shows smaller LDs, reduction in seed oil content, and complete absence of LD fusion during post-germinative growth. Genetic analyses using ole1 and ldps single mutants, double mutants, along with freeze-thaw experiments, demonstrated that OLE1 negatively regulates the LDPS-mediated promotion of LD expansion ().

In comparison to OLEOSIN protein, CALEOSIN, which comprises three distinct domains, including N-terminal hydrophilic domains, C-terminal hydrophilic domains, and a central hydrophobic anchor domain, with the N-terminal domain containing a calcium-binding motif, exhibits a lower abundance (; ). Moreover, from an evolutionary perspective, CALEOSIN protein exhibits homologous sequences in algae, fungi, and non-vascular plants, while such homology is not observed for OLEOSIN (). The A. thaliana genome contains eight CALEOSIN genes divided into two groups: high-Mw CALEOSIN (CLO1, CLO2, CLO3 and CLO8) and low-Mw CALEOSIN (CLO4-LOL7) (; ). Several studies have indicated that CALEOSIN proteins have overlapping functions in oil accumulation (; ; ). The STEREOLESIN-related proteins participate in intracellular signaling during plant growth and development by being involved in the phytohormone pathways, e.g. brassinosteroids-related pathways ().

2.2.2 Endoplasmic reticulum machinery: SEIPIN, LDIP, and VAP27

The SEIPIN complex, named after Berardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy (BSCL), associates with these lipid lenses and directs the budding of nascent LDs into the cytoplasm. Most plants have multiple SEIPIN genes, in A. thaliana, three SEIPIN genes encode proteins with conserved structural features, predicted to form barrel-like complexes at the ER-LD junction (). Notably, AtSEIPIN2 and AtSEIPIN3 have longer N termini, with AtSEIPIN3 promoting the proliferation of very small LDs in leaves (). The FFAT motifs present at the N termini of both SEIPIN2 and SEIPIN3 have been shown to interact with VAPs (). VAPs, which are conserved across kingdoms, have been identified as the structural elements that facilitate contact sites between organelle membranes. The LD-forming complex has been demonstrated to be stabilized by VAP27–1 through a direct interaction with the N terminus of SEIPIN2 and/or SEIPIN3, a process that is deemed to be essential for LD biogenesis (). In planta, loss of VAP27–1 results in the formation of large LDs in seeds, a phenotype similar to that observed in seipin2 seipin3 double mutants (). In addition, AtSEIPIN2 and AtSEIPIN3 are crucial for the modulation of the number and size of LDs by interacting with LDIP, facilitating LD biogenesis ().

3 Lipid droplet degradation through lipolysis by cytosolic lipases

In yeast, Drosophila, plants, and humans, stored TAGs are typically degraded by lipases, a conserved protein family with a patatin domain (Xu and Shanklin, 2016). As mentioned previously, lipolysis refers to the process of TAG degradation in LDs mediated by lipases, whereas lipophagy denotes an autophagic mechanism for LD degradation. The stored lipids are hydrolyzed by these lipases, leading to the breakdown of TAGs into components such as diacylglycerols (DAGs), monoacylglycerols (MAGs), fatty acids (FAs), and glycerol. Subsequent to this process, the hydrolytic byproducts enter diverse metabolic pathways, thereby playing pivotal roles in cellular growth, energy balance, and other physiological processes, occurring at the opportune moment (). SDP1, the patatin-like acyl-hydrolase domain protein encoding gene, was discovered using forward genetic screening in A. thaliana (Figure 1) (). Subsequent evidence suggests that this protein also serves as a primary enzyme for TAG hydrolysis in the leaves and roots of mature plants (; ). During the early stages of seed germination in A. thaliana, SDP1 initially localizes to the surface of peroxisomes in an inactive form and subsequently extends to the surface of LDs within peroxisomes to hydrolyze TAGs (). Further investigations have revealed that FYVE DOMAIN PROTEIN REQUIRED FOR ENDOSOMAL SORTING 1 (FREE1), within the ENDOSOMAL SORTING COMPLEX REQUIRED FOR TRANSPORT (ESCRT), directly interacts with both PEROXIN 11e (PEX11e) and SDP1, thereby facilitating the transport of SDP1 from peroxisomes to LDs (). In addition to SDP1, A. thaliana possesses other patatin domain-containing lipases, such as SDP1-LIKE (SDP1L), which exhibit lipase activity and can release FAs from TAGs (, ). Both SDP1 and SDP1L proteins are involved in the hydrolysis of TAGs during seed germination and also vegetative growth (; ). In addition, the AtOBL1 gene in A. thaliana encodes for an enzyme known as OIL BODY LIPASE 1, which is associated with LDs. AtOBL1 represents the only described TAG lipase from A. thaliana that is associated with LDs, as SDP1 is regarded as a peroxisome-associated protein ().

Besides, biochemical analysis indicates that SDP1 and SDP1L preferentially hydrolyze TAGs over DAGs and monoacylglycerols (MAGs). The purification of oil body membranes from sdp1 sdp1L double mutant seedlings revealed a deficiency in TAG lipase activity. However, the hydrolysis of DAGs and MAGs was still observed, indicating the presence of other lipid enzymes that function in synergy with patatin-like acyl-hydrolases to complete the hydrolysis of TAG (; , ).

Following the liberation of FAs into the cytoplasm by SDP1, these FAs are converted into CoA esters through the action of currently unidentified Acyl-CoA synthetases (). The subsequent translocation of FAs across the peroxisomal membrane is facilitated by PXA1, an ABCD transporter belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family. Notably, PXA1 exhibits a unique intrinsic Acyl-CoA thioesterase activity (). This distinctive property enables PXA1 to first bind fatty Acyl-CoAs on the cytosolic face of the peroxisomal membrane, then cleave the CoA moiety, and ultimately mediate the import of free FAs into the peroxisomal matrix for β-oxidation - a metabolic process that yields Acetyl-CoA as the end product (; ; ). In the case of impaired β-oxidation function, pxa1 mutants exhibit delayed germination and reduced germination rate due to insufficient ATP supply required for the germination process. However, this defect can be alleviated by supplementing external carbon sources (). In addition, compared to the wild type, pxa1 mutant shows increased sensitivity to dark conditions and exhibits early plant death due to the compromised β-oxidation ().

In addition, COMPARATIVE GENE IDENTIFICATION-58 (CGI-58) protein positively regulates lipid metabolism through β-oxidation-related pathway. Chapman et al. identified the homologous gene of human CGI58 in A. thaliana, referred to as CGI58-like (Yamaguchi and Osumi, 2009; ). In the A. thaliana mutant of this gene, plant leaves display a significantly increased TAG content of over tenfold compared to the wild type. However, unlike the sdp1 mutants, germination and growth of cgi-58 mutants do not show obvious defects (Yamaguchi and Osumi, 2009). Subsequent studies by Park et al. demonstrated that CGI-58 interacts with PXA1 to coregulate lipid homeostasis and signaling in A. thaliana ().

In the context of seedling establishment, the rapid breakdown of TAGs in planta, predominantly within four days, is particularly noteworthy. This phenomenon is further compounded by the accelerated degradation of LD-associated proteins, which may contribute to the enlargement of LDs during this critical phase. Studies have demonstrated that several LD proteins, including oleosins and steroleosins, have been observed to undergo polyubiquitination, a process associated with protein degradation (). This pathway, which is dependent on the removal of proteins from membranes, involves the action of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Intriguingly, the analysis highlights the potential role of CELL DIVISION CYCLE PROTEIN 48 (CDC48) unfoldases, conserved in eukaryotes, in facilitating the unfolding and removal of membrane proteins. In planta, CDC48 has been observed to collaborate with PUX10, a scaffold protein residing at the LDs, to facilitate the degradation of ubiquitinated proteins (; ). pux10 mutants exhibit a reduced rate of LD protein degradation and an accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins (). However, to date, no known degradation mechanism has been identified for LD membrane lipids.

4 Autophagic degradation of lipid droplets

Lipophagy, a selective autophagic process, first described in mammals, is a process that involves the selective uptake of LDs into the vacuole or lysosome, followed by their degradation (Figure 1, Table 1). Notably, mammalian lipophagy is a form of macroautophagy, in which autophagosomes engulf LDs, distinguishing it from microlipophagy observed in yeast. Autophagy, a self-degradative and highly conserved process, plays a crucial role in various developmental processes within cellular organisms (Zhao et al., 2020). Autophagy primarily functions through vacuolar degradation and recycling of harmful or obsolete cellular components, thereby maintaining cellular homeostasis and facilitating adaptation to environmental changes (; ; ; ). The identification of AUTOPHAGY-RELATED (ATG) genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revolutionized our understanding of autophagy, revealing a highly conserved eukaryotic mechanism (). Subsequent studies identified homologous ATG genes in plants, including A. thaliana, Oryza sativa, and Zea mays, through sequence alignment analyses (). These studies uncovered over 40 evolutionarily conserved ATG proteins that orchestrate autophagosome biogenesis and autophagy regulation across kingdoms, from yeast to mammals and plants ().

In A. thaliana, two independent studies, Fan et al. and Havé et al., reached the same conclusion through different approaches, thereby demonstrating the involvement of autophagy in the degradation of lipids (; ). Their findings suggest that, in A. thaliana leaves, basal autophagy contributes to TAG synthesis, whereas inducible autophagy under starvation contributes to LD degradation (). Besides, direct evidence through ultrastructural analysis has demonstrated that LDs are degraded in autophagic vacuoles (). In the parallel study, Havé et al. utilized protein and lipid profiling analyses on atg5 mutant, demonstrating that autophagy plays a pivotal role in the lipid metabolism of the ER and peroxisome in A. thaliana leaves (; ). Fan et al. investigated the role of autophagy in lipid metabolism by using mutants with auto (). In addition to its role in A. thaliana, autophagy has been observed to contribute to the degradation of LD in other plant species. In rice, investigating osatg7 mutants has demonstrated autophagy’s crucial role during the late stages of pollen meiosis. As LDs are critical for energy supply, osatg7 mutants exhibit reduced levels of autophagy, and such deficiency leads to impaired pollen maturation ().

5 Lipid droplets are involved in abiotic and biotic stress responses

5.1 Abiotic stress

It is imperative to acknowledge that plants are subject to numerous stressors throughout their life cycle, which necessitates the orchestration of adaptive responses to these environmental cues by all cellular organelles. Among these organelles, cytosolic LDs and their core set of neutral lipids and associated surface proteins play a significant yet understudied role. It has been demonstrated that environmental changes have a substantial influence on LD-related processes. For example, the abundance of LDs in A. thaliana leaves increases under drought, cold, or heat stress (Yang et al., 2011; ; ; Yang et al., 2024).

A close relationship exists between stress and TAG accumulation in plant tissues, especially the vegetative tissues (). For instance, low-nitrogen stress and the stress hormone abscisic acid (ABA) have been observed to stimulate TAG accumulation in A. thaliana seedlings (Yang et al., 2011; ; ). During periods of heat stress, cells undergo a process of unsaturated acyl chain replacement with saturated ones, a process that may lead to an increase in membrane fluidity (; Yang et al., 2024). This phenomenon suggests that LDs may absorb discarded unsaturated acyl chains from membrane lipids, resulting in the formation of triacylglycerols, thereby facilitating membrane remodeling (Yang et al., 2011; ). Transgenic plants overexpressing LIPID DROPLET-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS (LDAPs) exhibit enhanced drought tolerance, suggesting a close relationship between stress and TAG accumulation in vegetative tissues (Zhao et al., 2023).

It has been determined that ABA signaling plays a pivotal role in the regulation of LD generation, particularly with regard to the expression of DGAT1. Tobacco transient assays have revealed a synergistic effect of ABA-insensitive 4 (ABI4) and ABI5, two important ABA-related transcription factors, in regulating DGAT1 expression under stress (Yang et al., 2011; ). Furthermore, a comprehensive transcriptome analysis has revealed that LIPID DROPLET PROTEIN (LDP) genes, including OLEOSINs and CALEOSINs, exhibited up-regulation of up to 1000-fold through the activation of ABI3. This provides compelling genetic evidence that ABI3 activates oil accumulation, most likely through up-regulating LDPs (Yang et al., 2022).

5.2 Biotic stress

Furthermore, LDs have been observed as targets by invasive organisms. Phytophthora infestans degrade LDs as energy source in guard cells to maintain stomatal opening (Yang et al., 2021). Plant RNA viruses induce endomembrane proliferation for viral replication compartments (VRCs) formation, and the host lipid metabolism is crucial for their replication. However, to date, direct links between LDs and plant virus infection have not been firmly established, and the extent of their involvement in plant defense or viral benefit remains to be elucidated (Zhang et al., 2019). In addition, during infections by pathogens such as Botrytis cinerea or Pseudomonas syringae, the leaves of plants exhibit an increased accumulation of TAGs (; ). Besides, LDs have been proposed to function as “subcellular factories” for the production of antimicrobial compounds. For instance, two key lipid-modifying enzymes - peroxygenase (CLO3) and α-DIOXYGENASE (α-DOX) - coordinately catalyze a coupling reaction that converts α-linolenic acid into the antifungal compound 2-hydroxy-octadecanoic acid during defense responses against Colletotrichum higginsianum infection (). LDAP1, CLO3, and α-DOX1 are upregulated in leaves infected by Botrytis cinerea, suggesting that LD biosynthesis is induced either by the fungi or as a plant defense mechanism. The fatty acid composition of TAGs varies depending on the infecting pathogen, indicating the presence of distinct synthesis pathways. The hijacking of LDs by pathogens or their utilization by plants for defense mechanisms bears resemblance to the processes observed in animal cells (). Meanwhile, PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT 3 (PAD3), a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase known to be involved in the biosynthesis of antimicrobial phytoalexins, has been observed to translocate to LDs following infection by Pseudomonas syringae (). This dynamic relocation of defense-related enzymes to LDs highlights the organelle’s emerging role as a critical platform for organizing plant immune responses.

6 Conclusions and prospects

This review offers a detailed examination of the processes involved in the formation and breakdown of LDs in plants, emphasizing crucial enzymes, regulatory pathways, and physiological contexts. A more profound understanding of the regulatory mechanisms governing LD-associated pathways holds considerable potential for enhancing crop yield and promoting bioenergy production. Manipulating the genes and proteins involved in LD biogenesis and turnover may lead to the development of crops with higher oil yields and improved stress resilience.

Many studies have demonstrated that LDs play a crucial role in cellular lipid homeostasis. While much attention has been paid to how LD size and number are determined in plants (), the regulation of lipolysis and lipophagy-mediated lipid turnover, particularly during nutrient deprivation when plants rely on lipid catabolism for energy production, remains poorly understood. In mammals, the process of lipolysis is subject to stringent regulation, with the rate-limiting enzyme Adipose Triglyceride Lipase (ATGL) being subject to enhancement of up to 20-fold through its interaction with the activator CGI-58 (ABHD5) (). Concurrently, PLIN proteins function as a regulatory mechanism, sequestering CGI-58 and thereby impeding ATGL activity (). In contrast, plants employ SDP1 as their functional ATGL homolog, but lack both PLIN proteins and CGI-58-mediated activation of SDP1, despite the presence of a CGI-58 homolog that instead regulates PXA1 (). The current understanding of plant lipolysis regulation remains incomplete, particularly regarding whether energy-sensing pathways modulate SDP1 activity. The energy-sensing central regulators include the low-energy sensor SnRK1, the high-energy sensor TOR kinase and the sucrose-signaling metabolite T6P. These components form an intricate regulatory network where SnRK1 promotes lipolysis during energy deficit while TOR suppresses it under energy-replete conditions, with T6P fine-tuning this balance by inhibiting SnRK1 (; ; ). Critical areas for future investigation include investigating the possible direct phosphorylation of SDP1 by SnRK1/TOR kinases, characterizing the functional relationship between the energy sensing module and SDP1 during lipid mobilization, and identifying potential novel components that facilitate communication between SDP1 and energy-sensing pathways. Resolution of these questions will significantly advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling LD degradation and overall plant lipid homeostasis.

Current research indicates that plants may dynamically regulate the functions of LD-associated proteins through post-translational modifications (PTMs) in response to environmental stresses. Despite extensive characterization of LD protein PTMs in animal systems (Zhang et al., 2022; ), their functional validation and molecular mechanisms remain largely unexplored in plants. Ubiquitination may regulate LD protein turnover through either proteasomal degradation or selective autophagy (e.g., lipophagy), maintaining cellular homeostasis under stress conditions. Furthermore, oxidative modifications and SUMOylation likely participate in mediating LD-organelle interactions (e.g., with peroxisomes), affecting membrane remodeling and ROS scavenging. Future investigations should integrate subcellular proteomics, PTM site-directed mutagenesis, and super-resolution imaging to systematically decipher stress-specific PTM dynamics on LD proteins and their physiological relevance. Such advances would not only elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of plant lipid metabolism under stress but may also provide novel strategies for improving crop stress tolerance.

LDs serve as critical organelles in stress response mechanisms. Numerous abiotic stressors have been shown to induce LD biogenesis (Zhao et al., 2023; ). During senescence or stress conditions, TAG accumulation is closely linked to lipid catabolic processes. However, several key aspects remain poorly understood: the functional significance of fatty acids derived from membrane lipids like Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) (); the specific roles of various lipases in stress adaptation; and the degradation mechanisms of stress-induced LDs during post-stress recovery. While LD degradation during seed germination has been well characterized (), the catabolic pathways of stress-induced LDs and their contributions to cellular homeostasis restoration remain elusive. Particularly, the relative importance of lipolysis versus lipophagy in TAG remobilization, the metabolic fates of neutral lipids, and the subsequent utilization of released fatty acids all require systematic investigation (). Elucidating these processes will not only advance our understanding of plant stress responses but also provide a theoretical framework for developing stress-resistant crops through LD manipulation.

Research has shown that the proteome of LDs in plants undergoes extensive dynamic remodeling under diverse stress conditions (). This is evidenced by the specific upregulation of stress-responsive LD-associated proteins, such as CLO3 and α-DOX1, in both wild-type plants and the tgd1–1 sdp1–4 mutant (). Notably, different stresses exhibit distinct regulatory effects on LD proteins: CLO3 responds to both heat stress and pathogen infection, whereas α-DOX1 is selectively activated only under pathogen infection and drought stress conditions (). These findings suggest that plants have evolved a stress-specific LD reprogramming mechanism, fine-tuning protein expression to adapt to different environmental threats. However, the molecular mechanisms governing LD remodeling under various stress conditions remain poorly understood and warrant further investigation.

Statements

Author contributions

YZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RC: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. JL: Writing – original draft. YX: Writing – review & editing. LZ: Writing – review & editing. YY: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32300249 to LJ Zhou, 32200213 to YJ Ye) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20220418 to LJ Zhou, BK20220417 to YJ Ye).

Acknowledgments

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Correction note

A correction has been made to this article. Details can be found at: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1727402.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Summary

Keywords

lipid droplets, biogenesis, degradation, stress responses, SDP1, lipophagy

Citation

Zhao Y, Cao R, Li J, Xu Y, Zhou L and Ye Y (2025) Lipid droplets in plants: turnover and stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1625830. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1625830

Received

09 May 2025

Accepted

06 June 2025

Published

27 June 2025

Corrected

27 October 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Jinda Wang, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China

Reviewed by

Yuanyuan Song, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China

Ahmad Ali, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China

Aomei Li, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Lijuan Zhou, ; Yajin Ye,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics