Abstract
Halophyte such as ice plant is subjected to salinity and drought stress in their natural habitats, but our understanding of the effects of combined stress on plants is limited. This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms by which ice plant responds to combined salinity and alkalinity stress, which are currently unknown. This study evaluated the combined effects of salinity and alkalinity stress levels on the growth, mineral content, and phytochemical composition of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Therefore, experiment consisted of seven different salt treatments CK: distilled water control; T1: saline-alkali solution of 5 g/L; T2: saline-alkali solution of 10 g/L; T3: saline-alkali solution of 15 g/L; T4: saline-alkali solution of 20 g/L; T5: saline-alkali solution of 25 g/L; T6: saline-alkali solution of 30 g/L. The specific configuration method of the composite saline-alkali solution is to mix Na2SO4, NaCl, NaHCO3, CaCl2, MgCl2 in the proportion of 8:8:1:1:1 on the basis of distilled water. The results indicated that the T6 treatment (saline-alkali solution of 30 g/L) strongly decreased the plant height, stem thickness, leaf area and SPAD value of ice plants, and obviously suppressed the shoot and root biomass with the increase in salinity. While T2 treatment (saline-alkali solution of 10 g/L) application significantly increased the root activity, soluble sugar, soluble protein, vitamin C and flavonoid content, POD (Peroxidase), AsA (reduced ascorbate), MDA (Malondialdehyde), and reduced the proline content; H2O2, O2, K+ content, Na+ content, Cl+ content, and ratio of Na+/K+, respectively. Furthermore, plants grown with saline-alkali solution of 30 g/L presented the highest values of proline content, hydrogen peroxide, superoxide radicals and Na+ content, Cl+ content, ratio of Na+/K+ with the severity of the saline-alkali solution. The aboveground biomass of ice plant under saline-alkali stress was closely related to the Na+, K+, Na+/K+ ratio, proline, SOD, and CAT, indicating that the T2 treatment may alleviate the inhibition of ice plant growth by reducing the Na+/K+ ratio and improving antioxidant capacity. Therefore, planting ice plant in saline-alkali stress soil can provide additional minerals, phytochemicals, antioxidants, and related nutrients, and it is a vegetable suitable for saline-alkali stress areas.
Introduction
The ice plant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.) has become a model of salt stress response (). Moreover, it can effectively resist salt erosion by improving water use efficiency by converting the C3 to CAM photosynthesis mechanism (, ). This annual succulent herbaceous plant is known for its excellent salt tolerance and is a typical representative of halophytes (; ). Soil salinization, alkalinization, and drought are common problems worldwide, which have negative effects on plant development, growth and lead to an imbalance in farming and urban ecologies (; ). In arid climate conditions, flat agricultural lands are more susceptible to salinization due to high evapotranspiration (ET) rate and inadequate soil drainage (; ). In addition, showed that salt reaction leads to the localization of ions, receptors, and organic compounds. As a result, humans consume these bioactive compounds (antioxidants) in large quantities to neutralize health hazards (; ). These stresses can lead to significant reductions (>50%) in total yields of almost all major food crops in worldwide (). Soil particles can be divided into two categories: soils rich in salt (NaCl) and soils rich in solute (NaHCO3 and Na2CO3) (). Universally, water scarcity and flood problems strictly limit agricultural productivity ().
Salinity can cause a 50% yield loss (; ). Food supplies will need to increase by 70% by 2050 to keep pace with population growth, which will put pressure on food supplies (; ). Salinity stress can cause osmotic stress and ion toxicity, leading to severe growth and yield declines (). Salinity alters cellular ultrastructure, prevents photosynthesis, disrupts membrane structure, produces reactive oxygen species, inhibits enzyme activity, and has other effects on crop development and productivity (; ). Increasing soil salinization has become a threat to global crop production, and by the end of 2050, more than half of arable land will become saline (; ). Salt-induced osmotic stress reduces water uptake, root and stem cell expansion, stomatal conductance, and carbon dioxide uptake (; ). In addition, salt stress interferes with enzyme activity, photosynthesis, membrane structure, hormone balance, water and nutrient absorption, and induces oxidative stress (; ). Ice plants are known for their antioxidant properties, which scavenge (ROS) reactive oxygen species. In addition, ice plants contain antioxidant enzymes such as ascorbate peroxidase, SOD, and catalase (). Both temperature and salt concentration initially lead to tissue water stress due to osmotic pressure in the root zone, due to water stress or soluble salt concentration, with widespread negative effects on plant water uptake, nutrient uptake, development, and new root development (). However, as the salt concentration in the soil increases, the plant’s ability to excrete and store salt decreases, resulting in an increase in Na+ and Cl in the leaves, leading to salt concentration entering the second most common category of ion-induced toxicity (). Simultaneously, the levels of ROS were observed to significantly decrease in many plant tissues (; ; ). But, salt increase in soils can negatively affect plant physiology and anatomy, which can have multiple consequences (). First, the root system is affected by salt stress, causing short- and long-term changes (; ). As a direct response to salt, osmotic stress leads to a decrease in water availability, which inhibits plant growth (). Therefore, among the many abiotic stresses affecting global plant productivity, salt is one of the most important issues (). Plants have evolved to synthesize antioxidant (AOX) and antioxidant enzymes that work together to maintain the homeostasis to limit the creation of ROS and the damage they cause (; ). These metabolites are used to sense oxidative stress, detoxify or neutralize excess ROS, and protect macromolecules from oxidation (; ). The complexity of Na+ and Cl- concentrations in plant roots seems to be related to the ability to partition these toxic ions into the vacuole (; ) and to the local concentration and availability of AOX. Studies have shown that the effects of different combinations of stresses on ROS accumulation and antioxidant oxygen (AOX) capacity differ significantly from those observed under single stresses (; ). The ability of plants to tolerate drought and salinity is highly dependent on genotype, water availability, and environmental conditions, namely the coexistence of other stress factors (). Good results in terms of stress tolerance have been found in wild relatives of various crops such as ice plant, rice, ice, maize, soybean, cabbage and tomato (; ; ).
It is noteworthy that ice plant is a facultative halophyte that switches its uptake from C3 to CAM photosynthesis in response to excessive salinity, an eco-physiological adaptation that minimizes water loss and helps retain water by opening stomata at night to absorb CO2 from outside. During the dark period and early light period of the diurnal cycle, ice plant has a low carbon dioxide compensation point and a significantly lower photorespiration rate compared to C3 plants (; ). The morphological parameters depend on the field data, such as the number of leaves and lateral shoots, soil plant analyses development (SPAD), the root and shoot fresh weight and the dry weight of root and shoot (). SPAD is important for measuring chlorophyll content in leaves, which mainly determines photosynthesis efficiency and plant development (; ). The underground salt water in southern Xinjiang is large, and the irrigation and drainage water in the field is also salt water. The comprehensive development and utilization of salt water is an urgent problem to be solved. Ice plant is a typical salt-secreting plant. How to use the salt water resources in southern Xinjiang to produce ice plant to determine the utilization threshold, and use the salt absorption characteristics of ice plant to provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of saline-alkali land and the rotation system of vegetable secondary salinization. The objective is to identify the optimal salt concentration that balances plant growth and medicinal value, thereby maximizing the production potential of ice plants in a hydroponic system.
Materials and methods
Study site
The research was conducted in the solar greenhouse of Awati County, Aksu Prefecture, and Xinjiang Province during October to December 2024. There is a heating device in the greenhouse to confirm the standard growth of ice plant. During the experimental period, daily average temperature and light intensity variations were recorded using the RR-9100 recorder (Beijing Yugen Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing China) as show in Figure 1. The experiment selected crystal ice plant as the research object, selected 4 to 5 leaves, and the plants with uniform and strong growth were transplanted into the hydroponic box for 5 days before treatment. The nutrient solution was replaced every 3 to 5 days during the hydroponic process.
Figure 1
Experimental design
The experiment was conducted with a completely randomized design (CRD) using three replicates. Set 6 concentrations of compound salt stress treatment. During the research, the nutrient solution was exchanged regularly every 3 to 5 days. On the basis of distilled water, irrigation water was made of fresh water and chemicals Na2SO4, NaCl, NaHCO3, CaCl2, MgCl2 in a mass ratio of 8:8:1:1:1 (simulating the slightly salty water in southern Xinjiang); 100 plants were treated in each treatment, a total of 700 plants, and the ice plant was cultivated for 40 to 50 days. The various physiological indicators were measured when the ice plant was edible. A total of 6 treatments (T1~T6) were set up in the experiment, with the concentrations of the composite saline-alkali solution being 5g/L, 10g/L, 15g/L, 20g/L, 25g/L, and 30g/L, respectively, with pure distilled water as the control (CK). The specific configuration method of the composite saline-alkali solution is to mix Na2SO4, NaCl, NaHCO3, CaCl2, MgCl2 in the proportion of 8:8:1:1:1 on the basis of distilled water.
Measurements
Growth index
Tags 6 plants for each treatment, and measure their growth indexs every 5 days. Use a tape to measure the plant height in cm. Use a vernier caliper to measure the stem diameter which is 2 cm away from the root zone. Use SPAD-502 instrument to measure the largest leaf. The leaves at the fourth node are measured with a vernier ruler to measure the leaf thickness in (cm). Selected 3 plants of each treatment and measure the above and below dry and fresh weights, root morphology and root activity at the same time, respectively.
Physiological indicators
The ice plant was transplanted for 40 to 50 days. The various physiological indicators were measured when the ice plant was edible and reached to the harvest maturity stage. The duration of stress treatment before data measurement was calculated from the number of days after transplantation. Take the same type of tubes, draw 20 micro liters (0.02 ml) of enzyme solution was added 3 ml reaction solution, 4000Lux illumination (multi-annular fluorescent light incubator) 30 minutes (try to be consistent illumination conditions), while taking four test tubes, three do control, a blank (no enzyme solution to buffer instead); blank is set in the dark, the control (CK) and the enzyme solution was placed under the same conditions of illumination 4000Lux 30 minutes, shading save to blank zero, 560nm ratio color. Dark sample is use for machine zero and light sample is use in formula. Total superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was analysed at 560 nm according to the technique of (). The 20 microliters (0.02 ml) of enzyme solution +3 ml reaction solution and cuvette at 470 nm next time, a total of three times at intervals of one minute to read the readings to the value of absorbance change per minute (ΔA470/min • mg pr or ΔA470/mgFW) indicates the size of the enzyme activity. POD activity was calculated with analysed at 470 nm according to the technique of (). The 0.1 ml sample (or 50 L) +2.5 ml reaction liquid enzyme solution, 240 nm colorimetric, every one minute reading 1, a total of three readings. 2.5 ml reaction liquid is use to make the machine zero. CAT activity was determined according to the technique of (). MDA determination of 1 ml enzyme solution +2 ml of 0.6% of TBA, sealing boiling (100 C0) water bath for 15 minutes, then cooled rapidly centrifuged and the supernatant, at 600, 532, 450 nm three wavelengths than the color. 2.5 ml reaction liquid is use to make the machine zero. MDA content was analysed according to the technique of (). Total soluble protein content was measured by the Coomassie brilliant blue method, 20 micro liters (0.02 ml) of enzyme solution +3 ml G-250 for 2 minutes, 595 Namib color, while the blank (20 microliters phosphate buffer (PH = 7.8): +3 ml G-250) (). Proline content was calculated by the sulfosalicylic acid method, 0.3 g leaf blade, add 5 ml sulfosalicylic acid, stamped, boiling water bath for 10 minutes, filtered, and the filtrate 2 ml draw (at the same time as the blank, draw 2 ml of distilled water), 2 ml of glacial acetic acid and 3 ml of acidic ninhydrin, boiling water bath for 40 minutes, cooled, 5 ml of toluene was added, thoroughly shaken, still stratification, take the upper toluene solution in cuvette, 520 nm colorimetric (). Total soluble sugar was measured by the anthrone procedure (). Quantification of reduced ascorbic acid (AsA) was carried out according to the method of () by adding 6% trichloroacetic acid from frozen leaf and evaluating the AsA-mediated reduction of iron ions detected to form complexes with 2, 2-bipyridine at 525 nm. For flavonoid content, the technique defined by was used. The O2- content was calculated by () using an amendment of the method. The O2- content at 530 nm was analysed. The H2O2 content in the supernatant was analysed at 415 nm (; ).
Na+ and K+ contents
The contents of Na+ and K+ were measured when the plant was edible and reached the harvest maturity stage. The leaves of ice plant were heat treated for 30 min at 105°C, dried at 75°C and then ground into powder form. Each sample was digested with H2SO4-H2O2, and then the Na+ and K+ contents were determined by using a flame photometer (). At the same time, the nitrogen content was determined using an AA3 flow analyser ().
Statistical analysis
Data analysis is carried out as mean and standard error (SE) were analysed by using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by least significant difference (LSD) test at a significance (p ≤ 0.05) level with three replications. Analyses were performed using the STATISTICA application version 13.5.0.17.
Results and discussion
Plant growth and morphology parameters
Ice plants grown under different salt treatments showed appreciable differences in morphological parameters such as stem thickness, plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, thick leaves and SPAD to T2 treatment in the presence of saline-alkali solution of 10 g/L are showed in Table 1. Halophytes ice plant response to moderate salt concentration promotes their growth, whereas excessive salt concentration impairs their growth (; ; ). The decrease in root growth under high salt conditions may be due to a shift of energy from growth to maintaining osmotic pressure and facilitating toxin removal processes (). Moreover, such contrasts between environmental and salinity stresses reflect plant adaptations, likely to shift energy from shoot growth to help aboveground organisms maintain osmotic balance and improve survival under salinity stresses (). The stem thickness, plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, thick leaves and SPAD were significantly lower under the T6 treatment in the presence of saline-alkali solution of 30 g/L than that the CK treatment and displayed a decreasing trend with increasing stress severity. Drought and salt stress are believed to be important drivers of plant developmental processes that can lead to a decrease in chlorophyll (; ). However, treatment of plants with 10 g/l saline led to an increase in these parameters in all combined control treatments. The 10 g/l saline water and the percentage increase in root fresh weight, plant height, leaf number, leaf area, and leaf thicknes were 15.8%, 39.2%, 24.0%, 34.0%, and 31.5%, respectively, than those of 30 g/l saline solution. also found that ice plant leaf number, lateral leaf number, and leaf area were positively correlated with leaf and leaf biomass. confirmed that 400 mM NaCl improved the fresh weight of rice seedlings by 2 times compared to the control seedlings. Therefore, high salt concentrations may affect the biomass increase of snow plants.
Table 1
| Salt treatments | Plant height (cm) | Stem thickness (cm) | Number of leaves | Leaf area (cm2) | Thick leaves (cm) | SPAD value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 15.7 ± 2.41b | 0.93 ± 0.56c | 9.3 ± 4.23b | 131.0 ± 4.67d | 0.21 ± 0.25b | 51.8 ± 3.41b |
| T1 | 16.7 ± 2.23b | 1.06 ± 0.57b | 8.3 ± 3.41c | 136.0 ± 4.81c | 0.24 ± 0.29b | 54.3 ± 3.37b |
| T2 | 19.0 ± 3.45a | 1.19 ± 0.39a | 11.7 ± 4.34a | 151.9 ± 5.60a | 0.28 ± 0.36a | 58.3 ± 4.49a |
| T3 | 14.3 ± 2.04c | 1.14 ± 0.42a | 11.3 ± 4.36a | 147.7 ± 6.54b | 0.28 ± 0.36a | 57.1 ± 4.46a |
| T4 | 13.5 ± 1.09c | 1.05 ± 0.49b | 8.7 ± 2.22c | 127.2 ± 3.92e | 0.21 ± 0.25b | 48.6 ± 2.34c |
| T5 | 12.4 ± 1.13d | 0.96 ± 0.58c | 8.3 ± 2.42c | 106.7 ± 3.83f | 0.17 ± 0.21c | 43.6 ± 1.78d |
| T6 | 10.1 ± 1.14e | 0.89 ± 0.44d | 6.3 ± 1.39d | 88.7 ± 2.61g | 0.17 ± 0.21c | 41.2 ± 1.91d |
The effect of salt treatments on the plant height, stem thickness, number of leaves, leaf area, thick leaves and SPAD value, of ice plants grown under different salt treatments.
CK: distilled water control; T1: saline-alkali solution of 5 g/L; T2: saline-alkali solution of 10 g/L; T3: saline-alkali solution of 15 g/L; T4: saline-alkali solution of 20 g/L; T5: saline-alkali solution of 25 g/L; T6: saline-alkali solution of 30 g/L. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). Values represented means ± SD (n = 9).
Ice plant grown under various salt concentrations indicated a significant variance in properties such as SPAD value, shoot and dry weight (g/plant), root volume, and root activity. The increasing trend of chlorophyll contents observed in 200 mM NaCl solution may indicate that plants are in a stress adaptation stage where they optimize their photosynthetic apparatus to cope with oxidative stress (; ). Then, as shown in Table 1, SPAD values of T2 and T3 treatments were significantly higher, while SPAD values of T5 and T6 treatments were lower. Moreover, this opposite behaviour between moisture and salt stresses reflects a plant adaptation, which may be shifting energy from root growth to helping roots osmotic pressure and improve survival at moderate salt stress (). Root weights were measured to investigate their growth under diverse saline and alkaline conditions. When grown in 10 g/L saline-alkaline solution, shoot and root FW of plant 1 were 299 and 17 g/plant, respectively (Figure 2). Similarly, root volume and root activity of T2 treatment were considerably greater than all other treatments, respectively. reported that accumulate salt storing large amounts of NaCl and CaCl2 in the shoot. Furthermore, this salt-loving plant grows well in a salt environment with salinity ranging from 100 to 400 mM ().
Figure 2
Total soluble sugar, protein, vitamin C and flavonoid content of ice plant
Exogenous application of saline-alkaline solution significantly affected the soluble protein, total sugar, vitamin C and flavonoid of ice plant under the salt stress condition (Figure 3). Compared with CK, different degrees of saline-alkaline solution salt stress significantly improved the soluble protein, total sugar, vitamin C and flavonoid of T2 treatment, which were 12.9, 40.1 and 290.1 mg g-1, respectively. The vitamin C content was 26.2 mg/100g, which was higher than all other treatments. Therefore, MT application could increase the proline of plants under saline soil, which could help increase the osmotic potential of leaves, enhance water absorption, promote photosynthesis, and ultimately improve the characteristics of plants under saline soil (). The effect of saline-alkaline solution application depends on the type of application and the concentration of the saline-alkaline solution. The contents of soluble total sugar, protein, vitamin C, and flavonoid compounds in both T1 and T2 treatments first increased with the increase of saline-alkaline solution concentration, and all reached a peak value of 10 g L-1 in T2 treatment, and then decreased with further increase of saline-alkaline solution concentration. Flavonoids content can protected from biotic and abiotic stresses through antioxidant activities (; ). In T6 treatment, the soluble total sugar and flavonoid contents monotonically reduced with the intensification of saline-alkaline solution concentration and reached the lowest value. The soluble total protein content of 10 g L-1 saline-alkaline solution under salt stress increased significantly compared with CK treatment, and the application of saline-alkaline solution had a significant effect on the soluble total protein content in T2 and T3 treatments. Under CK treatment, the soluble protein and sugar content decreased considerably, and the largest increase occurred at 10 g L-1. Under T4 and T5 treatments, the application of saline-alkaline solution significantly decreased vitamin C, and the smallest decrease occurred at 20 and 25 g L-1, respectively. Under salt stress conditions, plants accumulate water-retaining compounds, soluble sugars (), and proline () to maintain water balance and prevent plant dehydration under drought conditions. Proline helps scavenge ROS, stabilize cell membranes, and inhibit protein and enzyme degradation under salt stress (). Table 2 shows the Pearson correlation coefficients between antioxidant enzyme activities, reactive oxygen species, antioxidants, growth factors, protein, proline, and MDA contents of snow leaf leaves. A significant positive correlation was observed between flavonoid content and H2O2 content, K+, LA, plant height, SPAD, dry weight, and dry weight, whereas a negative correlation was observed with protein content.
Figure 3
Table 2
| AsA | CAT | Cl+ | FC | H2O2 | K+ | LA | MDA | Na+ | Na+/K+ | O2 | POD | PH | SOD | SPAD | SW | SP | PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT | 0.44 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cl+ | 0.43 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||||||
| FC | 0.09 | 0.04 | -0.72* | |||||||||||||||
| H2O2 | -0.27 | -0.06 | 0.53* | -0.74* | ||||||||||||||
| K+ | -0.24 | -0.12 | -0.96** | 0.86** | -0.69* | |||||||||||||
| LA | 0.37 | 0.56* | -0.37 | 0.82** | -0.74* | 0.60* | ||||||||||||
| MDA | 0.58* | 0.79** | 0.53* | 0.04 | 0.12 | -0.35 | 0.42 | |||||||||||
| Na+ | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.98** | -0.78* | 0.61* | -0.97** | -0.47 | 0.44 | ||||||||||
| Na+/K+ | 0.06 | -0.12 | 0.82* | -0.91** | 0.84** | -0.94** | -0.82** | 0.11 | 0.87** | |||||||||
| O2 | -0.04 | -0.20 | 0.77* | -0.90** | 0.84** | -0.90** | -0.84** | 0.01 | 0.83** | 0.98** | ||||||||
| POD | 0.44 | 0.83** | 0.37 | 0.18 | -0.17 | -0.15 | 0.61* | 0.89** | 0.29 | -0.12 | -0.23 | |||||||
| PH | 0.28 | 0.11 | -0.54* | 0.95** | -0.84** | 0.73* | 0.87** | 0.14 | -0.62* | -0.86** | -0.86** | 0.32 | ||||||
| SOD | 0.02 | 0.65* | 0.41 | -0.46 | 0.08 | -0.35 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.41 | -0.37 | |||||
| SPAD | 0.45 | 0.52* | -0.40 | 0.84** | -0.73* | 0.63* | 0.98** | 0.39 | -0.51 | -0.82** | -0.84** | 0.52 | 0.87** | -0.05 | ||||
| SW | 0.17 | 0.14 | -0.75* | 0.91** | -0.87** | 0.89** | 0.84** | -0.07 | -0.82** | -0.97** | -0.96** | 0.12 | 0.88** | -0.22 | 0.87** | |||
| SP | 0.68* | 0.49 | 0.82** | -0.22 | 0.07 | -0.65 | 0.16 | 0.76* | 0.75* | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.70* | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.11 | -0.29 | ||
| PC | -0.1 | 0.15 | 0.74* | -0.78* | 0.52 | -0.78* | -0.49 | 0.19 | 0.81** | 0.72* | 0.68* | 0.25 | -0.66* | 0.62* | -0.63* | -0.79* | 0.46 | |
| RW | 0.39 | 0.50* | -0.42 | 0.85** | -0.55* | 0.61* | 0.91** | 0.47 | -0.52 | -0.76* | -0.79* | 0.51 | 0.82** | -0.20 | 0.95** | 0.80** | 0.06 | -0.67* |
Pearson’s correlation coefficients of antioxidant enzyme activities, reactive oxygen species (ROS), protein, proline and MDA contents of ice plant.
AsA, reduced ascorbate; CAT, Catalase; Cl+ content; FC, flavonoid content; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; K+ content; LA, leaf area; MDA, Malondialdehyde; Na+ content, ratio of Na+/K+; O2, superoxide radicals; POD, Peroxidase; PH, plant height; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; SW, shoot weight; RW, root weight; SP, soluble protein; PC, proline content.
Significant at the 0.01 (**) probability level; Significant at the 0.05 (*) probability level.
Antioxidant and toxic compound in ice plant
The SOD, POD, CAT, and AsA activities were considerably different among the different water treatments (Figure 4). These factors are essential for reducing ROS-induced damage by increasing the plant’s disease resistance, especially in the root system, which is consistent with the decrease observed in vascular plants (; ). The SOD and CAT were significantly higher in T3 treatment compared to all other treatments. Whereas, the activities of POD and AsA were significantly higher in T2 treatment than in other treatments. However, there were also significant differences in the formation of toxins among the different aqueous solutions, and the patterns of antioxidant enzymes also differed. The 500 mM NaCl showed the ability to form a protective layer and increase the weight of the cells. Plant flavonoids have free radical scavenging and free radical scavenging effects, which may involve the following mechanisms: (a) inhibition of ROS production by inhibition or activation of free radical scavengers; (b) ROS scavenging; and (c) increased immunity (; ). The T2 treatment (10 g L-1) produced the highest MDA content compared with all other treatments (Figure 4). Application of 30 g L-1 saline solution under saline conditions had a significant effect on ROS production in ice plant. Furthermore, significant positive correlations were observed between stem dry weight and CAT, FC, K+, LA, plant height, SPAD, and surface roughness. Correlation analysis also showed positive correlations between MDA and POD, soluble protein, AsA, CAT, and Cl+ levels.
Figure 4
The highest SOD content and production were observed under the condition of 15 g L-1 saline solution. This is because these ROS play a critical role in key signaling pathways associated with the stress response (; ; ). Inhibition of these types of ROS and their subsequent damage by SOD and CAT is a key mechanism of action (; ). As expected, the CK treatment had the lowest levels of CAT, POD, and AsA. However, there was non-significant variance in proline content between the CK and T1 treatments, with T1 treatment producing significantly lower levels of proline. The production of ROS (H2O2 and O2-) was the highest when 30 g L-1 of saline solution was applied, while the production of ROS (H2O2 and O2-) was the lowest in the T1 treatment with 5 g L-1 of saline solution (Figure 5). Plants use a variety of antioxidants to regulate ROS production and thus prevent salt stress-induced damage by effectively scavenging ROS or restoring intracellular antioxidant levels (; ). There was no difference in H2O2 production between T3 and T4 treatments. However, the highest POD, AsA, and MDA activity values were detected in the T2 treatment. While on other hand, the highest levels of SOD and proline were present in T4 treatment. It is known that abiotic factors such as salinity and drought stresses increase the ROS activity, which induces oxidative stress and plant oxidative pathways (; ). The strong interaction network emphasized the important role of polyphenols in the antioxidant activity of M. crystallinum under salt stress, indicating that the pathogen system was more efficient under optimal salt stress conditions (; ; ).
Figure 5
Ion contents in ice plant
The results showed that snow plant accumulated more K+ under CK treatment, while the contents of Na+, Cl+, and Na+/K+ were higher under T6 treatment (Figure 6). Na+ is the major ion responsible for salt degradation in plants. Since the ionic radius and adsorption capacity of Na+ are comparable to those of K+, higher concentrations of Na+ and decrease K+ absorption by inhibiting movement, resulting in Na+ toxicity and K+ leaching (; ). There was no significant difference in Na+ retention in the leaves of snow-covered plants under T4, T5, and T6 treatments. In addition, the Na+ content in T4, T5, and T6 treatments was highest because salt transport from root cells to the mesophyll depends on inositol, and inositol interactions facilitate the uptake and long-distance transport of salt. It has been reported that many halophytes accumulate Na+ in their leaves and roots in biosaline cultivation, which leads to a decrease in cation such as K+ (; ). According to the results of K+ ion determination, CK application had the highest value, and T6 application had the lowest value. There was non-significant variance in K+ ion accumulation between T5 and T6 applications. These results indicate that lower CaCl2 concentrations affect K+ ion accumulation in leaf tissues. However, Na+, and K+, sorption rates were higher in CaCl2 salt application because NaCl inhibits K+ ion concentration, while CaCl2 increases Cl and Ca2+ content in leaves, leading to the sorption of other cations (; ). As Cl+ levels increased, significant differences were observed in the T4 (41 ± 20 g/L) and T5 (43 ± 25 g/L) treatments.
Figure 6
The excretion, transport, and sequestration of toxic ions are highly relevant to water conservation, which will be discussed later, as efficient water conservation requires a balance between Na+ and Cl+ in the vacuole and between K+ and solute receptors. The Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ ratio of the T1 was considerably lower as compare with other treatments, and the other treatments were relatively equal. The Na+/K+ ratio in the T6 were considerably higher as compared with CK treatment. The Na+/K+ ratio was the lowest in CK and T1 treatments. On the other hand, the T6 treatment (15 g of/L) had the maximum Na+, Cl+, and Na+/K+ ratios. K+ and Na+ have similar chemical properties, so their absorption and distribution are based on a common transport system, and excess Na+ can compete with K+. This affects the Na+/K+ ratio and leads to K+ deficiency, which in turn affects growth and stress resistance (; ; ). There are many Limitations of hydroponics studies over conventional agriculture, there are some, higher set up cost, growers require skill and knowledge to maintain optimum production in commercial applications (), because each plant in a hydroponics system is sharing the exact same nutrient, diseases and pests can easily affect each plant, plants react quicker to changes in the environment (), however, if this change is for the worst, plants will quickly react to it; showing signs of deficiency or trouble, hot weather and limited oxygenation may limit production and can result in loss of crops ().
Conclusion
Exploring the stress resistance mechanism of the ice plant is becoming a hot research direction for plant physiologists. This study indicated that saline-alkali stress soil affected the production of phytochemicals, food growth, and nutritional value in ice plant leaves. This study indicated that with the increase of salinity, T6 (30 g/L saline-alkali solution) considerably decreased the stem diameter, plant height, SPAD, and leaf area of ice plant and significantly inhibited the biomass of aboveground and roots. T2 treatment (10 g/L saline-alkali solution) significantly increased root activity, soluble sugar, soluble protein, vitamin C and flavonoid content, POD, AsA, MDA, and significantly decreased the proline content; H2O2, O2-, K+, Na+, Cl+ and Na+/K+ ratio, respectively. In addition, plants grown in 30 g/L saline-alkali solution showed the highest proline content, hydrogen peroxide, superoxide radicals. This indicates that T2 application can alleviate the inhibition of ice plant growth by biomass in saline-alkali land by reducing the Na+/K+ ratio and improving antioxidant defence system. These findings provide a deeper understanding of ice plants to reflect the degree of tolerance to combined saline-alkali salt stress soil to provide a theoretical basis for the sustainable development of the ice plants industry in arid and saline-alkali salt stress areas. Promoting the cultivation of this highly nutritional plant in moderately saline environments may thus present a specific interest. In addition, further studies seem to be required to clarify the effect of different types of salt treatments on the growth and secondary metabolism of ice plants.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
XM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft. XG: Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. LX: Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. YG: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the President’s Fund Project of Tarim University (TDZKSS202346, TDZKSS202208) ;The earmarked fund for Xinjiang Agriculture Research System (XJARS-07-12).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1626676/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbbasT.NadeemM. A.TanveerA.ChauhanB. S. (2017). Can hormesis of plant-released phytotoxins be used to boost and sustain crop production? Crop Prot.93, 69–76.
2
AbobattaW. F. (2020). “Plant responses and tolerance to combined salt and drought stress,” in Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. HasanuzzamanM.TanveerM. (Eds.), (Springer), 17–52. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40277-8
3
AgarieS.KawaguchiA.KoderaA.SunagawaH.KojimaH.NoseA.et al. (2009). Potential of the common ice plant, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum as a new high-functional food as evaluated by polyol accumulation. Plant Prod Sci.12, 37–46. doi: 10.1626/pps.12.37
4
AhlawatO. P.YadavD.WaliaN.KashyapP. L.SharmaP.TiwariR. (2024). Root exudates and their significance in abiotic stress amelioration in plants: a review. J. Plant Growth Regul.43, 1736–1761. doi: 10.1007/s00344-024-11237-7
5
AhmadJ.HayatF.KhanU.AhmedN.LiJ.ErcisliS.et al. (2024). Melatonin, A promising approach to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in horticultural plants. South Afr. J. Bot.164. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1140803
6
AlamH.KhattakJ. Z. K.KsiksiT. S.SaleemM. H.FahadS.SohailH.et al. (2021). Negative impact of long-term exposure of salinity and drought stress on native Tetraena mandavillei L. Physiol. Plant172, 1336–1351. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13273
7
AlkharabshehH. M.SeleimanM. F.HewedyO. A.BattagliaM. L.JalalR. S.AlhammadB. A. (2021). Field crop responses and management strategies to mitigate soil salinity in modern agriculture: a review. Agronomy11, 2299. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112299
8
AsadM. A. U.YanZ.ZhouL.GuanX.ChengF. (2024). How abiotic stresses trigger sugar signaling to modulate leaf senescence? Plant Physiol. Biochem.210, 108650. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108650
9
AslamM. T.KhanI.ChatthaM. U.MaqboolR.ZiaulhaqM.LigongW.et al. (2023). The critical role of nitrogen in plants facing the salinity stress: Review and future prospective. Not Bot. Horti Agrobo51, 13347. doi: 10.15835/nbha51313347
10
AtzoriG.de VosA. C.van RijsselbergheM.VignoliniP.RozemaJ.MancusoS.et al. (2017). Effects of Increased Seawater Salinity Irrigation on Growth and Quality of the Edible Halophyte Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. under Field Conditions. Agric. Water Manage.187, 37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.020
11
AtzoriG.NissimW.MacchiavelliT.VitaF.AzzarelloE.PandolfiC.et al. (2020). Tetragonia tetragonioides (Pallas) Kuntz. as promising salt-tolerant crop in a saline agricultural context. Agric. Water Manage.240, 106261.
12
BagwasiG.AgenbagG. A.SwanepoelP. A. (2020). Efect of salinity on the germination of wheat and barley in South Africa. Crop Forage Turfgrass Manage.6, e20069. doi: 10.1002/cft2.20069
13
BaoG. Z.TangW. Y.AnQ. R.LiuY. X.TianJ. Q.ZhaoN.et al. (2020). Physiological effects of the combined stresses of freezing-thawing, acid precipitation and deicing salt on alfalfa seedlings. BMC Plant Biol.20, 204. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02413-4
14
BarchengerD. W.NareshP.KumarS. (2019). “Genetic resources of capsicum.” In: The Capsicum Genome. RamchiaryN.KoleC. (Eds.) 9–23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97217-6_2
15
BauchetG.CausseM. (2012). “Genetic diversity in tomato (solanum lycopersicum) and its wild relatives.” In: Genetic Diversity in Plants. CaliskanM. (Ed.) 133–162. doi: 10.5772/33073
16
BekmirzaevG.OuddaneB.BeltraoJ.FujiiY. (2020). The impact of salt concentration on the mineral nutrition of Tetragonia tetragonioides. Agriculture10, 238. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10060238
17
BohnertH. J.CushmanJ. C. (2000). The ice plant cometh: lessons in abiotic stress tolerance. J. Plant Growth Regul.19, 334–346. doi: 10.1007/s003440000033
18
CerrutiP.CampobenedettoC.MontrucchioE.AgliassaC.ContarteseV.AcquadroA.et al. (2024). Antioxidant activity and comparative RNA-seq analysis support mitigating effects of an algae-based biostimulant on drought stress in tomato plants. Physiol. Plant176, e70007. doi: 10.1111/ppl.70007
19
ChoudhuryS.MoulickD.GhoshD.SolimanM.AlkhedaideA.GaberA.et al. (2022). Drought-induced oxidative stress in pearl millet (Cenchrus americanus L.) at seedling stage: survival mechanisms through alteration of morphophysiological and antioxidants activity. Life12, 1171. doi: 10.3390/life12081171
20
EohG.KimC.BaeJ.ParkJ. (2024). Evaluation of sodium chloride concentrations on growth and phytochemical production of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. in a hydroponic system. Horticulturae10, 1304. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10121304
21
FangG.YangS.RuanB.YeG.HeM.SuW.et al. (2024). Research progress on physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of potato in response to drought and high temperature. Horticulturae10, 827. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10080827
22
FerdosiM. F. H.ShoaibA.HabibS.KhanK. A. (2021). Modulation of salt-induced stress impact in Gladiolus grandiflorus L. by exogenous application of salicylic acid. Sci. Rep.11, 15597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95243-9
23
GaoY.MaX.ZhangZ.WangX.WangY. (2024). Brassinolides signaling pathway: tandem response to plant hormones and regulation under various abiotic stresses. Hortic. Adv.2, 27. doi: 10.1007/s44281-024-00050-7
24
GillespieK. M.AinsworthE. A. (2007). Measurement of reduced, oxidized and total ascorbate content in plants. Nat. Protoc.2, 871–874. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.101
25
GuoR.ZhouZ.CaiR.LiuL.WangR.SunY.et al. (2024). Metabolomic and physiological analysis of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in response to saline and alkaline stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem.207. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108338
26
HasanuzzamanM.ZhouM.ShabalaS. (2023). How does stomatal density and residual transpiration contribute to osmotic stress tolerance? Plants12, 494. doi: 10.3390/plants12030494
27
HuangP.HeL.AbbasA.HussainS.HussainS.DuD.et al. (2021). Seed priming with sorghum water extract improves the performance of camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) crantz.) under salt stress. Plants10, 749.
28
HussainI.ShehzadM. A.AkhtarG.Shafique AhmadK.MubeenK.HassanW.et al. (2024). Supplemental sodium nitroprusside and spermidine regulate water balance and chlorophyll pigments to improve sunflower yield under terminal drought. ACS Omega9, 30478–30491. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c02061
29
IbrahimovaU.ZivcakM.GasparovicK.RastogiA.AllakhverdievS. I. (2021). Electron and proton transport in wheat exposed to salt stress: Is the increase of the thylakoid membrane proton conductivity responsible for decreasing the photosynthetic activity in sensitive genotypes? Photosynthesis Res., 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11120-021-00853-z
30
KashyapP. L.RaiP.SrivastavaA. K.KumarS. (2017). Trichoderma for climate resilient agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.33, 155. doi: 10.1007/s11274-017-2319-1
31
KimB. H.KimS. Y.NamK. H. (2012). Genes encoding plant-specific class III peroxidases are responsible for increased cold tolerance of the brassinosteroid-insensitive 1. Mol. Cells34, 539–548. doi: 10.1007/s10059-012-0230-z
32
KongY.ZhuY.GaoC.SheW.LinW.ChenY.et al. (2013). Tissue-specific expression of SMALL AUXIN UP RNA41 differentially regulates cell expansion and root meristem patterning in arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol.54, 609–621. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct028
33
LiS.HamaniA. K. M.SiZ. Y.LiangY. P.GaoY.DuanA. W. (2020). Leaf gas exchange of tomato depends on abscisic acid and jasmonic acid in response to neighboring plants under different soil nitrogen regimes. Plants9, 1674. doi: 10.3390/plants9121674
34
LiL.ZhuT.WenL.ZhangT.RenM. (2024). Biofortification of potato nutrition. J. Adv. Res. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2024.10.033
35
LibuttiA.CammerinoA. R. B.MonteleoneM. (2018). Risk assessment of soil salinization due to tomato cultivation in mediterranean climate conditions. Water (Switzerland)11), 10. doi: 10.3390/w10111503
36
MaY.DiasM. C.FreitasH. (2020). Drought and salinity stress responses and microbe-induced tolerance in plants. Front. Plant Sci.11, 591911. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.591911
37
MadhaviB. G. K.KhanF.BhujelA.JaihuniM.KimN. E.MoonB. E.et al. (2021). Influence of different growing media on the growth and development of strawberry plants. Heliyon, e07170.
38
MillerG.SuzukiN.Ciftci-YilmazS.MittlerR. (2010). Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ.33, 453–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x
39
MittlerR. (2017). ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci.22, 11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.002
40
MndiO.SogoniA.JimohM. O.WilmotC. M.RautenbachF.LaubscherC. P. (2023). Interactive effects of salinity stress and irrigation intervals on plant growth, nutritional value, and phytochemical content in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. Agriculture13, 1026. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13051026
41
MohantaT. K.BashirT.HashemA.Abd_AllahE. F.KhanA. L.Al-HarrasiA. S. (2018). Early events in plant abiotic stress signaling: interplay between calcium, reactive oxygen species and phytohormones. J. Plant Growth Regul.37, 1033–1049. doi: 10.1007/s00344-018-9833-8
42
MuhammadH. M. D.NazS.AhmadR.AliE.AnwarM.AltafM. A.et al. (2024). Melatonin triggers salinity tolerance in pansy (Viola tricolor) by regulation of defense system. J. King Saud Univ. Sci.36. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103286
43
MukhopadhyayR.SarkarB.JatH. S.SharmaP. C.BolanN. S. (2021). Soil salinity under climate change: challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J. Environ. Manage.280, 111736. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2020.111736
44
MüllerM.Munn´ e-BoschS. (2011). Rapid and sensitive hormonal profiling of complex plant samples by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Plant Methods7, 37. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-7-37
45
MuneebaKhaliqA.MuhammadF.KhanM. D.AlharbiS. A.AnsariM. J.et al. (2024). Mitigating the toxic effects of salinity in wheat through exogenous application of moringa leaf extract. J. Ecol. Eng.25, 268–278. doi: 10.12911/22998993/186503
46
MunnsR.TesterM. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.59, 651–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
47
NakanoY.AsadaK. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol.22, 867–880. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232
48
NasirM. W.TothZ. (2022). Effect of drought stress on potato production: a review. Agronomy12, 635. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030635
49
NazN.FatimaS.HameedM.AshrafM.AhmadM. S. A.AhmadF. (2022). Contribution of structural and functional adaptations of hyper-accumulator Suaeda vera forssk. ex JF gmel. for adaptability across salinity gradients in hot desert. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.29, 64077–64095. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19167-1
50
NazirF.MahajanM.KhatoonS.AlbaqamiM.AshfaqueF.ChhillarH.et al. (2023). Sustaining nitrogen dynamics: A critical aspect for improving salt tolerance in plants. Front. Plant Sci.14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1087946
51
OhD. H.BarklaB. J.Vera-EstrellaR.PantojaO.LeeS. Y.BohnertH. J.et al. (2015). Cell type-specific responses to salinity—The epidermal bladder cell transcriptome of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. New Phytol.207, 627–644. doi: 10.1111/nph.13414
52
OrsS.EkinciM.YildirimE.SahinU.TuranM.DursunA. (2021). Interactive effects of salinity and drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and physiology of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings. South Afr. J. Bot.137, 335–339. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2020.10.031
53
OrsS.SuarezD. L. (2017). Spinach biomass yield and physiological response to interactive salinity and water stress. Agric. Water Manage.190, 31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.05.003
54
Quezada-MartinezD.Addo NyarkoC. P.SchiesslS. V.MasonA. S. (2021). Using wild relatives and related species to build climate resilience in Brassica crops. Theor. Appl. Genet.134, 1711–1728. doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03793-3
55
RajagopalanN.NelsonK. M.DouglasA. F.JheengutV.AlarconI. Q.McKennaS. A.et al. (2016). Abscisic acid analogues that act as universal or selective antagonists of phytohormone receptors. Biochemistry55, 5155–5164. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00605
56
RenZ. H.GaoJ. P.LiL. G.CaiX. L.HuangW.ChaoD. Y.et al. (2005). A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat. Genet.37, 1141–1146. doi: 10.1038/ng1643
57
SahinU.EkinciM.OrsS.TuranM.YildizS.YildirimE. (2018). Effects of individual and combined effects of salinity and drought on physiological, nutritional and biochemical properties of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitata). Sci. Hortic.240, 196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.016
58
SeleimanM. F.AslamM. T.AlhammadB. A.HassanM. U.MaqboolR.ChatthaM. U.et al. (2022). Salinity stress in wheat: effects, mechanisms and management strategies. Phyton- Int. J. exprimental Bot.91, 667–694. doi: 10.32604/phyton.2022.017365i
59
ShahT.LatifS.SaeedF.AliI.UllahS.AlsahliA. A.et al. (2021). Seed priming with titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhances seed vigor, leaf water status, and antioxidant enzyme activities in maize (Zea mays L.) under salinity stress. J. King Saud University-Science33, 101207. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.10.004
60
ShiC.GuoF.SunY.HanJ.ZhengX.ZhangJ.et al. (2024). Physiological and transcriptomic analysis of Hordeum jubatum seedlings in response to salt, alkali and drought stresses under uniform water potential. Environ. Exp. Bot.220. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105677
61
SoaresC.CarvalhoM. E. A.AzevedoR. A.FidalgoF. (2019). Plants facing oxidative challenges—A little help from the antioxidant networks. Environ. Exp. Bot.161, 4–25. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.12.009
62
TahaR. S.SeleimanM. F.ShamiA.AlhammadB. A.MahdiA. H. A. (2021). Integrated application of selenium and silicon enhances growth and anatomical structure, antioxidant defense system and yield of wheat grown in salt-stressed soil. Plants10, 1040. doi: 10.3390/plants10061040
63
TapiaG.MéndezJ.InostrozaL. (2016). Different combinations of morphophysiological traits are responsible for tolerance to drought in wild tomatoes Solanum Chilense and Solanum Peruvianum. Plant Biol.18, 406–416. doi: 10.1111/plb.12409
64
TyśkiewiczA.NowakE.OzimekJ.Jaroszuk-Sciseł. (2022). Trichoderma the current status of its application in agriculture for the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens and stimulation of plant growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 2329.
65
UrmiT. A.IslamM. M.ZumurK. N.AbedinM. A.HaqueM. M.SiddiquiM. H.et al. (2023). Combined effect of salicylic acid and proline mitigates drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) through the modulation of physiological attributes and antioxidant enzymes. Antioxidants12, 1438. doi: 10.3390/antiox12071438
66
Van ZelmE.ZhangY.TesterinkC. (2020). Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.71, 403–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100005
67
VersluesP. E.SharmaS. (2010). Proline metabolism and its implications for plant environment interaction. Arabidop. Book8, e0140. doi: 10.1199/tab.0140
68
WangP.LiuW. C.HanC.WangS.BaiM. Y.SongC. P. (2024). Reactive oxygen species: multidimensional regulators of plant adaptation to abiotic stress and development. J. Integr. Plant Biol.66, (3) 330–367. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13601
69
WrzecíE.KowalczykM.AraujoA.Zbieta Gał˛eskaE.Wrzecí NskaM.KowalczykA.et al. (2022). Reproductive consequences of electrolyte disturbances in domestic animals. Biology11, 1006.
70
Zaher-AraT.BoroomandN.Sadat-HosseiniM. (2016). Physiological and morphological response to drought stress in seedlings of ten citrus. Trees (Berl.)30, 985–993. doi: 10.1007/s00468-016-1372-y.\
Summary
Keywords
ice plant, antioxidant activity, hydrogen peroxide, halophyte, peroxidase, salinity stress
Citation
Ma X, Zhou S, Guo X, Xin L and Guan Y (2025) Assessment of various salt water stresses with mineralization on plant growth and antioxidants activity to regulate oxidative stress and ROS scavenging of halophyte ice plant. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1626676. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1626676
Received
11 May 2025
Accepted
28 July 2025
Published
15 September 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Raoudha Abdellaoui, Institut des Régions Arides, Tunisia
Reviewed by
Mustapha Gorai, University of Gabes, Tunisia
Maher Mahmoudi, Tunis El Manar University, Tunisia
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Ma, Zhou, Guo, Xin and Guan.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shaoliang Zhou, shaoliang_zhou88@outlook.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.