Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1628728

Unraveling Historical Genetic Divergence and Gene Flow Patterns Between Island (Taiwan) and Mainland (China) of Fagus hayatae

Provisionally accepted
Rizal  M SuhardiRizal M Suhardi1Li-Ping  JuLi-Ping Ju2Tsai-Wen  HsuTsai-Wen Hsu3Tze-Ying  ChenTze-Ying Chen4Huei-Chuan  ShihHuei-Chuan Shih5Zhiyong  ZhangZhiyong Zhang6*Yazhu  KoYazhu Ko1*Meng-Shin  ShiaoMeng-Shin Shiao7*Yu-Chung  ChiangYu-Chung Chiang1*
  • 1National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • 2Taiwan Forestry research institute, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 3Taiwan Biodiversity Research Institute, Nantou, Taiwan
  • 4National Ilan University, Ilan, Taiwan
  • 5Meiho University, Pingtung, Taiwan
  • 6Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China
  • 7Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The disjunctive distribution of Fagus hayatae between Taiwan and mainland China provides a unique framework for understanding phylogeographic patterns and evolutionary processes in relict tree species. This study investigated the genetic diversity, population structure, and phylogeographic history of F. hayatae using microsatellite and chloroplast DNA markers. Analysis of 249 samples from nine populations revealed that Taiwanese populations possess higher genetic diversity with significant inbreeding, while mainland Chinese populations showed lower diversity and inbreeding levels. Chloroplast DNA analysis identified eight haplotypes, with unique variants in Taiwanese populations. AMOVA confirmed significant genetic differentiation between the two regions, revealing four distinct clustering patterns and three clear phylogenetic clades, including an early-diverging Taiwanese TS population. Molecular divergence time estimation based on chloroplast DNA sequences indicates a temporal divergence pattern within F. hayatae populations, with the Taiwanese TS lineage exhibiting an earlier separation event, followed by subsequent divergence between other Taiwanese populations (PCTS and AW) and mainland Chinese populations (CH). These phylogeographic events temporally correspond with significant paleoclimatic and geotectonic episodes in East Asia. Demographic and historical biogeography inference revealed a recent population decline in Taiwan, in contrast to more stable population dynamics on the mainland, while historical gene flow between the regions remains limited, and suggested several dispersals and vicariant events influencing the current genetic structure. These findings not only delineate the genetic structure shaped by historical geographic isolation and contemporary evolutionary processes but also emphasize Taiwan’s role as a genetic refugium for F. hayatae.

Keywords: Fagus hayatae, Phylogeography, genetic diversity, population structure, Gene Flow, Relict species

Received: 14 May 2025; Accepted: 16 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Suhardi, Ju, Hsu, Chen, Shih, Zhang, Ko, Shiao and Chiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Zhiyong Zhang, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China
Yazhu Ko, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Meng-Shin Shiao, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Yu-Chung Chiang, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.