CORRECTION article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1631832
This article is part of the Research TopicSustainable management of Tuta absolutaView all 4 articles
Corrigendum: Nanocarrier-mediated RNAi of CYP9E2 and CYB5R enhances susceptibility of invasive tomato pest, Tuta absoluta to cyantraniliprole
Provisionally accepted
Farman Ullah1
Guru-Pirasanna-Pandi Govindharaj2
Hina Gul1Rudra Madhab Panda2
Ghulam Murtaza3
ZHIJUN JUN ZHANG1
Jun Huang1
Xiaowei Li1*
Nicolas Desneux4
Yaobin Lu1- 1Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- 2National Rice Research Institute (ICAR), Cuttack, Odisha, India
- 3China Agricultural University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 4Institut National de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE), Paris, Auvergne, France
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Corrigendum on: Ullah F, G G-P-P, Gul H, Panda RM, Murtaza G, Zhang Z, Huang J, Li X, Desneux N and Lu Y (2025) Nanocarrier-mediated RNAi of CYP9E2 and CYB5R enhance susceptibility of invasive tomato pest, Tuta absoluta to cyantraniliprole.Front. Plant Sci. 16:1573634. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1573634 In the published article, there was an error in the article title. Instead of "[Nanocarrier-mediated RNAi of CYP9E2 and CYB5R enhance susceptibility of invasive tomato pest, Tuta absoluta to cyantraniliprole]", it should be "[Nanocarrier-mediated RNAi of CYP9A306 and CYB5R enhances susceptibility of invasive tomato pest, Tuta absoluta to cyantraniliprole]".The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. In the published article, there was an error in the legend for [Figure 2] as published. [In the legend, the gene name "CYP9E2" is wrong. It should be replaced by the correct name "CYP9A306". The corrected legend appears below.[Relative expression levels of CYP9A306 and CYB5R genes in cyantraniliprole-resistant (CyanRS) and susceptible (SS) strains of Tuta absoluta. Data presented as mean ± SE of the three independent biological replicates. The asterisks **** show significant differences at P < 0.0001, based on Student's t-test.]PAGE \* Arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 3The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.In the published article, there was an error in the legend for [Figure 3] as published. [In the legend, the gene name "CYP9E2" is wrong. It should be replaced by the correct name "CYP9A306". The corrected legend appears below.[Phylogenetic and motif analysis of the CYB5R (a, b) and CYP9A306 (c, d) in lepidopteran insect species]The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.In the published article, there was an error in the legend for [Figure 4] as published. [In the legend, the gene name "CYP9E2" is wrong. It should be replaced by the correct name "CYP9A306. Also, the word "dsCYP9E2/SPc" should be revised as " dsCYP9A306/SPc. Revise the "Tukey's post hoc test" by " Tukey's HSD test"". The corrected legend appears below.[Nanocarrier-mediated RNAi of CYP9A306 and CYB5R genes increases the sensitivity of the cyantraniliprole-resistant strain (CyanRS) of Tuta absoluta against cyantraniliprole. (a) Schematic diagram of nanocarrier-mediated RNA interference. (b) Relative mRNA expression level of CYP9A306 and CYB5R genes in CyanRS and SS populations of Tuta absoluta. Data presented as mean ± SE of the three independent biological replicates. (c) The activity of cytochrome P450 enzyme among CyanRS and SS populations of Tuta absoluta. (d) Mortality rates (%) of cyantraniliprole-resistant strain of Tuta absoluta at 48 h of feeding on dsCYP9A306/SPc, dsCYB5R/SPc, dsEGFP/SPc, and DEPC water after exposure to the LC50 of cyantraniliprole. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at P<0.001 level (one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's HSD test]The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Table 1: In the published article, there was an error in [ The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: Resistance evolution, RNA Interference, biological traits, Lepidoptera, Gene Expression
Received: 20 May 2025; Accepted: 27 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ullah, Govindharaj, Gul, Panda, Murtaza, ZHANG, Huang, Li, Desneux and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xiaowei Li, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.