ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Functional Plant Ecology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1647198
Interactive effects of life cycle and monocot-dicot lineage on genome size–trait relationships in angiosperms: A phylogenetically informed analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Shandong University of Aeronautics, Binzhou, China
- 2Institute of Subtropical Agriculture Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, China
- 3Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Mengla, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Genome size in angiosperms exhibits extraordinary variation, influencing a wide array of biological and ecological characteristics. Although prior studies have established links between genome size and certain functional traits, how the interaction between two fundamental axes of angiosperm diversity-life cycle (annual vs. perennial) and monocot-dicot distinction-shapes group-specific variation in genome size and its relationship with plant functional traits remains insufficiently understood. We assembled a comprehensive dataset encompassing 2,285 angiosperm species from 186 families, measuring genome size (1C-value) and monoploid genome size (1Cx-value) to account for polyploidy, as well as key size-related traits, including plant height and the length and width of leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds. To evaluate the relationships between genome size and these functional traits while controlling for shared evolutionary history, we conducted phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) analyses. The results indicated that the interaction between life cycle and monocot-dicot distinction is a primary determinant of both 1C and 1Cx variation, with perennial monocots exhibiting the largest 1C and 1Cx values and a significant interactive effect between these two axes of diversity. Patterns of correlation between genome size metrics (1C, 1Cx) and functional traits are group-specific and sometimes reversed, reflecting divergent adaptive strategies-for example, genome size (1C) is positively correlated with plant height in annuals but negatively in perennials.Phylogenetic correction revealed that some associations, such as the negative correlation between genome size and plant height in perennials, are largely driven by shared ancestry and disappear after accounting for phylogeny, whereas others, such as the positive correlation between genome size (1C, 1Cx) and petal length, remain robust across groups, indicating a conserved adaptive relationship. The use of 1Cx confirmed that observed patterns reflect fundamental genome architecture rather than solely polyploidy effects. These findings demonstrate that the interplay between life cycle and monocot-dicot distinction fundamentally shapes genome size (1C, 1Cx)-trait relationships in angiosperms, providing new insights into the evolutionary and adaptive mechanisms underlying plant diversity.
Keywords: Angiosperms, functional traits, genome size (1C), monoploid genome size (1Cx), life cycle, monocot-dicot distinction
Received: 15 Jun 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Wen, FU, Cao, Cui, Du, Chen and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Wan-Li Zhao, Shandong University of Aeronautics, Binzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.