ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Functional and Applied Plant Genomics
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Plant Breeding Through Pangenomics and Multi-Omics Integration: Toward AI-Driven Predictive Models for Crop ImprovementView all articles
Integrating Machine Learning and GGE Biplot for Identification of Climate-Suitable Grasspea Genotypes
Provisionally accepted- 1ICARDA-Food Legumes Research Platform, Sehore, India
- 2Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, India
- 3Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, India
- 4Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
- 5Sivas Bilim ve Teknoloji Universitesi, Sivas, Türkiye
- 6Bilkent Universitesi, Ankara, Türkiye
- 7International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, New Delhi, India
- 8ICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Grasspea is a nutrient-rich food legume crop known for its resilience in the challenging agro-ecosystems. However, information is scanty regarding the recommendation of grasspea genotypes with respect to their suitability for both general and specific adaptations. The primary goal of the study was to delineate stable grasspea genotypes by nullifying the influence of intricate interactions among multiple traits with environment. Additionally, the study aimed to identify suitable locations within diverse agro-climatic zones of India for future evaluation while also validating and predicting results using machine learning algorithms. From several hundred genotypes developed and tested in station trials at Amlaha, India, a panel of 64 diverse promising grasspea genotypes were identified and their performance was subsequently assessed through multilocation testing at four diverse locations in India during 2021-22 using GGE biplot approach. Mean selection index of each genotype was enumerated considering multi-trait performance for better elucidation of genotype and environment ranking as well as selection of mega environment. The findings revealed that the environment was the primary contributor to variation across all studied traits, followed by genotype × environment interactions as the second most influential factor. Genotypes such as FLRP-B54-1-S2, Prateek, 31-GP-F3-S7, 31-GP-F3-S4, FLRP-B38-S5, 48-GP-F3-S3, and BANG-288-S2 were identified as good performers with promising multi-trait performance. Experimental results were validated using multiple performance metrics, with the Random Forest (RF) model of machine learning demonstrating superior predictive accuracy compared to the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model. Regression coefficient (R²) values ranged between 0.558 and 0.947, depending on the output variables. In conclusion, 'Prateek,' '31-GP-F3-S7,' and '48-GP-F3-S3' emerged as the most stable genotypes when considering their combined yield-trait performance. These genotypes can be recommended for widespread commercial cultivation in regions where grasspea cultivation faces challenges of weather extremities.
Keywords: stability, Selection index, GE interaction, machine learning, Grasspea
Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Barpete, Das, Parikh, Yumnam, AASIM, Ali, Singh, Yadav, Devate, Kaul, Bhattacharya, Roy, Gupta and Kumar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Surendra Barpete, surendrabarpete@gmail.com
Shiv Kumar, sk.agrawal@cgiar.org
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
