Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Functional Plant Ecology

This article is part of the Research TopicPlants in Karst Degraded Habitats: Diversity, Evolution, and Ecological FunctionsView all 5 articles

Stand Spatial Structure Promotes Tree Growth and Sapling Diversity in Northern Tropical Karst Seasonal Rainforest

Provisionally accepted
Lingyan  LiLingyan LiBin  WangBin WangFuzhao  HuangFuzhao HuangJianxing  LiJianxing LiWusheng  XiangWusheng XiangDongxing  LiDongxing LiFang  LuFang LuRuixia  MaRuixia MaXiankun  LiXiankun LiYili  GuoYili Guo*
  • Guangxi Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Guilin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Stand spatial structure and sapling diversity are essential for maintaining ecosystem stability. However, the dynamic characteristics of stand spatial structure, its driving factors, and its influence on sapling diversity remain unclear. This study was conducted in a 15-ha forest dynamics plot located in the seasonal rainforest of the northern tropical karst region. We analyzed stand dynamics by characterizing multivariate distributions of stand spatial structure within random structural units, together with stand growth, mortality, and recruitment processes. To evaluate spatial autocorrelation and its drivers, we constructed spatial lag models and spatial error models. Generalized additive models were further applied to assess the effects of topography on stand spatial structure, as well as the influence of stand spatial structure on sapling diversity. The overall stand exhibited a uniform angle index of 0.5, a mingling index of 0.75, and a dominance index of 0.49, indicating random species distribution with moderate to high mingling. Null, univariate, bivariate, and trivariate distributions of stand spatial structure exhibited no significant change over the past decade. At the individual-tree level, however, survival, mortality, and recruitment processes induced notable shifts in spatial structure, which were more pronounced than the overall stand-level dynamics. Topography strongly influenced spatial structural metrics: elevation explained 31.35% and 64.99% of the variance in mingling and dominance, respectively, making it the most important factor for these indices, while slope accounted for 22.53% of the variance in the uniform angle index, serving as its primary driver. Among structural attributes, mingling had overwhelming explanatory power for sapling diversity, accounting for 99.68% of the variance in the Shannon–Wiener index, 99.70% in the Simpson index, 54.88% in Pielou's evenness index, and 99.69% in Margalef's diversity index, identifying it as the dominant factor regulating sapling diversity. These findings demonstrate that considering the dynamic changes of stand spatial structure at the individual-tree level, together with its effects on sapling diversity, is essential for understanding the structural and functional properties of tropical karst forests.

Keywords: Stand spatial structure, nearest-neighbor trees, topography, Dynamic changes, karstforest

Received: 19 Jun 2025; Accepted: 06 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Wang, Huang, Li, Xiang, Li, Lu, Ma, Li and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yili Guo, yiliguo810414@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.