ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1650327
This article is part of the Research TopicRecent Advances in Vegetative Propagation of PlantsView all articles
Aeroponics Enables Consistent Cutting Propagation of Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): Impacts of Photoperiod, Cultivar, and Rooting Hormone
Provisionally accepted- 1Environmental Horticulture Department, University of Florida Mid-Florida Research and Education Center, Apopka, United States
- 2University of Florida Mid-Florida Research and Education Center, Apopka, United States
- 3Mid-Columbia Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, United States
- 4Department of Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Florida Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) has gained increasing attention for its potential to manage pain and alleviate opioid withdrawal symptoms. Despite growing interest, cultivation practices, including vegetative propagation, remain underexplored. This study compared indoor aeroponics with greenhouse mist systems for rooting kratom cuttings and evaluated the effects of photoperiod, rooting hormone, and cultivar on the rooting success. In Study I, a total of 180 ‘MR-Malaysian’ cuttings were placed in aeroponic units, 15 cuttings per unit. Twelve aeroponic units were randomly assigned to 10-, 14-, or 24-hour photoperiods in environmentally controlled growth rooms, with four units per room, and evaluated over two seasons. In parallel, 60 cuttings, 15 per tray, were placed under a greenhouse mist system for comparison across three seasons. A 14-hour photoperiod significantly enhanced root initiation and growth compared to a 10-hour photoperiod, as indicated by increased root length, area, crossing, and dry mass. The aeroponic system consistently promoted high rooting percentages (85%-92%) and root growth, whereas the greenhouse mist system exhibited high seasonal variability (7%-98%) and inconsistent rooting success. In Study II, cuttings derived from three kratom cultivars (MR-Malaysian, DR-Bumblebee, and Hawaii) were tested simultaneously using two propagation methods: indoor aeroponic and greenhouse mist systems, with or without rooting hormone treatments (5 mg/L IBA and 2.5 mg/L NAA). ‘MR-Malaysian’ overall outperformed the others, exhibiting high rooting rates and root growth with a relatively short production cycle, as well as being less susceptible to Fusarium. While hormone application increased root number in aeroponic system, it had minimal effects on other parameters. Our results showed that the aeroponic system consistently yielded a significantly higher rooting percentage and better rooting quality compared to the greenhouse mist system across all three cultivars. Such qualities included greater final root number, root dry mass, root length, root area, root volume, and higher numbers of root tips, forks, and crossings. However, the aeroponic system may pose a possibility of spreading pathogens. This study, for the first time, demonstrates that photoperiod, rooting system, and cultivar are crucial factors in rooting kratom cuttings. The aeroponic system represents a new and effective way of propagating kratom cuttings year-round.
Keywords: controlled environment, Genotype, hydroponic, Medicinal crops, root morphology, Root scanning
Received: 19 Jun 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Montanez, Pearson, Li and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jianjun Chen, Environmental Horticulture Department, University of Florida Mid-Florida Research and Education Center, Apopka, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.