Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Sustainable and Intelligent Phytoprotection

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1654386

This article is part of the Research TopicAccurate Measurement and Dynamic Monitoring of Forest ParametersView all 11 articles

Accurate Tree Disc Volume Estimation Using TLS: Validation and Improvement via Point Cloud Repair

Provisionally accepted
LU  XIELU XIE1旦  赵旦 赵2*fangming  wufangming wu2*
  • 1Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
  • 2Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing Normal University State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Tree trunk volume is a key parameter in forest inventory. Traditional forest surveys typically rely on sample trees and trunk volume equations to estimate tree trunk volume; however, the collection of sample trees is destructive, and trunk volume equations often involve considerable estimation errors.As an emerging technology, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has been regarded as an efficient and high-precision alternative for tree trunk volume estimation. Nevertheless, the accuracy of TLS in tree-level trunk volume estimation still lacks systematic evaluation. To this end, this study used TLS to scan disc samples cut from standard trees, and evaluated the reliability of TLS-based tree trunk volume estimation by comparing point cloud-derived disc volumes with those obtained using the water displacement method. Utilizing the Leica RTC360 scanner, 123 disc samples from four tree species (Altingia excelsa, Robinia pseudoacacia, Platycladus orientalis, and Quercus suber) were collected. A novel bottom surface filling algorithm based on point cloud projection was developed to mitigate data loss at disc bases, followed by Poisson surface reconstruction and trunk volume calculation via the Divergence Theorem. The results demonstrated high accuracy (R² = 0.940, CCC = 0.9745, rRMSE = 14.92%), with a slight underestimation bias (-5.31 cm³ ). Species-specific analyses indicated significant differences in estimation accuracy (Kruskal-Wallis, H = 21.1606, p = 0.0001), with Platycladus orientalis exhibiting the highest accuracy (rRMSE = 4.37%) due to its smooth bark and uniform wood structure, while Quercus suber showed the largest errors (rRMSE = 7.10%) attributed to its rough, blocky bark. Bark characteristics, and wood structure, were identified as key factors influencing TLS accuracy. The analysis revealed that smoother scanned surfaces-comprising both bark surfaces and cross-sections-resulted in higher estimation accuracy. These surface characteristics are closely linked to species-specific external texture and internal wood structure. This study elucidates the influence mechanisms of species-specific physical characteristics on the accuracy of TLS-based trunk volume estimation, and proposes targeted strategies for optimizing scanning parameters and point cloud processing. The study provide a robust theoretical and technical foundation for high-precision, non-destructive tree trunk volume measurement in forestry applications.

Keywords: terrestrial laser scanning, Disc volume estimation, Volume accuracy validation, Water displacement method, 3D Reconstruction

Received: 26 Jun 2025; Accepted: 12 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 XIE, 赵 and wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
旦 赵, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing Normal University State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Beijing, China
fangming wu, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing Normal University State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.