Straw strip mulching boosts potato yields by enhancing soil moisture and water use efficiency

Qian Chen¹Lei Chang^2*FANXIANG HAN^3*Yuwei Chai¹Shouxi Chai¹Linlin Wang¹Jiantao Ma¹Khuram Shehzad Khan¹

• ¹State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Biology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
• ²Gansu Agricultural University State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Lanzhou, China
• ³Lanzhou City University, Lanzhou, China

In semi-arid rainfed areas, water scarcity severely limits potato production. Here, we investigated the effects of mulching practices on soil moisture and their impact on potato yield. A two-year field experiment (2018 - 2019) was conducted with five treatments, traditional bare-land planting without mulching (CK); large ridges and small furrows with only ridges mulched with black plastic film in fall (FPM); a partial-field mulching using whole cornstalks in straw mulching strips that alternate with planting strips without mulch in fall (FSM); large ridges and small furrows with only ridges mulched with black plastic film in spring (SPM); a partial-field mulching using whole cornstalks in straw mulching strips that alternate with planting strips without mulch in spring (SSM). StudyThe results demonstrated that SSM and SPM significantly increased soil water storage (0–200 cm) by 6.7% and 8.4%, yield by 14.7% and 25.1%, and water-use efficiency (WUE) by 9.2% and 14.3%, respectively, compared to CK. Compared to spring mulching, the fall mulching outperformed in improving soil water retention and yield., increasing soil water storage by an average of 10.2% vs. 4.9%, and fresh potato yield by 17.8% vs. 11.8%. SSM and SPM reduced water consumptionevapotranspiration (ETWC) during the early growth stage (planting-to-budding) by 8.2–9.8%, conserving water for later use. This conserved water was then available during the critical yield-forming period, leading to increased WC during budding-to-tuber expansion by 10.3–11.3%.sowing-to-budding (by 8.2–9.8%) but increased ET during budding-to-tuber bulking (by 10.3–11.3%). SSM increased evapotranspiration WC more than FSM (12.3% vs. 10.2%), while FPM increased evapotranspiration WC more than SPM (20.3% vs. 13.1%). The findings indicated that both the straw strip mulching (SM) and plastic film mulching (PM) optimized the water consumption structure, . Fall mulching generally outperformed spring mulching because it captured and conserved autumn and winter precipitation more effectively, resulting in higher soil water storage at planting.with fall mulching generally outperforming spring mulching. Both straw and plastic film mulching improve water use and potato yields, with fall application were most effective. However, for sustainable production, straw strip mulching is recommended, as it offers both high crop yields and significant environmental benefits.